K151008 · Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG · KRO · Aug 26, 2015 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K151008
Device Name
LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C®
Applicant
Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG
Product Code
KRO · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Aug 26, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3510
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is intended to be used with the components of the Endo-Model® SL® Rotating and Non-Rotating Hinge Knee or Endo-Model® Knee System (#K143179) which can be integrated for knee joint replacement and with the MP® Reconstruction Prosthesis (#K142187) for hip replacement. The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is indicated for treatment of any of the following Limb salvage/Oncology procedures: 1) Revision for loosened femoral prosthesis components involving extensive bone loss; 2) Surgical intervention for severe trauma; 3) Oncology cases where extensive resection and replacement of bone is required from tibia to hip area; The device is to be used with bone cement unless a proximal femur or a modular stem is indicated for use. For the use of the LINK® Endo-Model® SL® Rotating and Non-Rotating Hinge Knee System additional indications should be noted: 1) Bone necroses. 2) Bicondylar arthrosis by partly damaged collateral ligaments. 3) Revision after primary total knee replacement. 4) Revision surgery after hinge knee or rotational knee joint. 5) Revision surgery by insufficient / inadequate bone mass. 6) Arthrosis of patella flange. 7) Valgus/Varus deformities <10°. 8) Valgus/Varus deformities 10-15°. 9) Valgus/Varus deformities 15-20°. For the use of the LINK® Endo-Model® SL® Non-Rotating Hinge Knee System additional indications should be noted: 10) Bicondylar arthrosis by completely damaged collateral ligaments and muscular instability. 11) Valgus/Varus deformities 20-30°.
Device Story
LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is a modular orthopedic prosthesis system for limb salvage, oncology, and complex revision procedures. It provides partial or total femur replacement and integrates with Endo-Model® SL® knee systems and MP® reconstruction hip prostheses. The system consists of proximal femoral, distal femoral, proximal tibial, and total femur modules, featuring various neck segments, stems, and coupling components. It is used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings to replace bone segments lost to trauma, oncology, or failed primary arthroplasty. The device is typically fixed with bone cement, though cementless modular stems are available. By restoring skeletal structure and joint function, the system aims to improve patient mobility and quality of life in cases of severe bone loss.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical performance testing was required for this device. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing, including tibial bearing wear tests (ISO 14243-1/2), tibial baseplate fatigue (ISO 14879, ASTM F1800), femoral neck/stem fatigue (ISO 7206-6/4), proximal femoral component fatigue (ASTM F2580), and modular connection fretting/corrosion testing (ASTM F1875-98).
Technological Characteristics
Modular prosthesis system constructed from CoCrMo casting alloy and non-crosslinked UHMWPE. Modular stems (cementless) utilize Ti-6Al-4V alloy. System includes femoral/tibial segments, coupling components, and stems. Testing performed per ISO 14243, ISO 14879, ISO 7206, ASTM F1800, ASTM F2580, and ASTM F1875. Designed for cemented or cementless (stems) fixation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for limb salvage/oncology procedures including revision for loosened femoral components with extensive bone loss, severe trauma, and oncology cases requiring extensive bone resection from tibia to hip. Additional indications for knee system components include bone necrosis, bicondylar arthrosis with collateral ligament damage, revision of primary total knee/hinge/rotational knee, insufficient bone mass, patella flange arthrosis, and valgus/varus deformities up to 30°.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace part of a knee joint. The device limits translation or rotation in one or more planes and has components that are linked together or affined. This generic type of device includes prostheses composed of a ball-and-socket joint located between a stemmed femoral and a stemmed tibial component and a runner and track joint between each pair of femoral and tibial condyles. The ball-and-socket joint is composed of a ball at the head of a column rising from the stemmed tibial component. The ball, the column, the tibial plateau, and the stem for fixation of the tibial component are made of an alloy, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum. The ball of the tibial component is held within the socket of the femoral component by the femoral component's flat outer surface. The flat outer surface of the tibial component abuts both a reciprocal flat surface within the cavity of the femoral component and flanges on the femoral component designed to prevent distal displacement. The stem of the femoral component is made of an alloy, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, but the socket of the component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The femoral component has metallic runners which align with the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tracks that press-fit into the metallic tibial component. The generic class also includes devices whose upper and lower components are linked with a solid bolt passing through a journal bearing of greater radius, permitting some rotation in the transverse plane, a minimal arc of abduction/adduction. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features the department's name in a circular arrangement around a symbol. The symbol consists of three stylized human profiles facing to the right, representing the department's focus on health and human well-being. The profiles are depicted in a simple, abstract manner.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Waldemar Link GmbH & Company KG Ms. Stefanie Reimers Regulatory Affairs Barkhausenweg 10 22339 Hamburg Germany
August 26, 2015
Re: K151008
Trade/Device Name: Link® Megasystem-C® Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3510 Regulation Name: Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KRO, LZO, JDI, LWJ Dated: July 23, 2015 Received: July 24, 2015
Dear Ms. Reimers:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related
{1}------------------------------------------------
adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Druq Administration
#### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name
LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C®
Indications for Use (Describe)
The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is intended to be used with the components of the Endo-Model® SL® Rotating and Non-Rotating Hinge Knee or Endo-Model® Knee System (#K143179) which can be integrated for knee joint replacement and with the MP® Reconstruction Prosthesis (#K142187) for hip replacement.
The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is indicated for treatment of any of the following Limb salvage/Oncology procedures:
1) Revision for loosened femoral prosthesis components involving extensive bone loss;
2) Surgical intervention for severe trauma;
- 3) Oncology cases where extensive resection and replacement of bone is required from tibia to hip area;
The device is to be used with bone cement unless a proximal femur or a modular stem is indicated for use.
For the use of the LINK® Endo-Model® SL® Rotating and Non-Rotating Hinge Knee System additional indications should be noted:
1) Bone necroses.
- 2) Bicondylar arthrosis by partly damaged collateral ligaments.
- 3) Revision after primary total knee replacement.
4) Revision surgery after hinge knee or rotational knee joint.
- 5) Revision surgery by insufficient / inadequate bone mass.
6) Arthrosis of patella flange.
7) Valgus/Varus deformities <10°.
8) Valgus/Varus deformities 10-15°
9) Valgus/Varus deformities 15-20°.
For the use of the LINK® Endo-Model® SL® Non-Rotating Hinge Knee System additional indications should be noted: 10) Bicondylar arthrosis by completely damaged collateral ligaments and muscular instability.
11) Valgus/Varus deformities 20-30°
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
| Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
FORM FDA 3881 (1/14)
Page 1 of 2
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
4-2
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
{3}------------------------------------------------
### This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (1/14)
Page 2 of 2
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| 510(k) Submitter: | Waldemar Link GmbH & CO. KG<br>Barkhausenweg 10<br>22339 Hamburg, Germany<br>Phone: +49-40-539950<br>Facility Registration #:3004371426 (Oststraße 4-10) |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG<br>Stefanie Reimers (Regulatory Affairs)<br>Oststraße 4-10<br>Norderstedt, GERMANY 22844<br>Phone: +49-40 53995-530<br>Fax: +49-40 53995-174<br>E-Mail: S.Reimers@linkhh.de |
| Date Prepared: | April 14th, 2015 |
| Trade Name: | LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® |
| Common Name: | Total Knee and Hip Revision Prosthesis |
| Classification Name: | Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented<br>prosthesis; 21 CFR §888.3510, product code KRO<br><br>Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constraint cemented or<br>nonporous uncemented;<br>21 CFR §888.3353, product code LZO<br><br>Hip joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented<br>prosthesis; 21 CFR §888.3350, product code JDI<br><br>Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metallic cemented or<br>uncemented prosthesis; 21 CFR §888.3360, product code<br>LWJ |
| Classification and Panel: | Class II, Orthopedic / 87 |
| Predicate Devices: | GMRS™ Global Modular Replacement System, manufactured<br>by Stryker, K023087, cleared December 16, 2002 |
| Device Description: | The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is comprised of a number<br>of components that are intended to be used in conjunction<br>with each other, or in conjunction with components of<br>LINK® Endo-Model® SL® Rotating and Non- Rotating<br>Hinge Knee, LINK® Endo-Model® Knee System<br>(#K143179) and LINK® MP® Reconstruction Prosthesis<br>(#K142187) |
{5}------------------------------------------------
There are three (3) modules of the MEGASYSTEM-C®:
- Proximal Femur -
- Distal Femur / Proximal Tibia -
- Total Femur -
# Proximal Femur:
The Proximal Femur Module of the MEGASYSTEM-C® contains the following components:
- Proximal Femoral Components (Neck segments) ●
- . Coupling Components
- Support Ring, Terminals .
- Stem Segments ●
- . Modular Stems
# Distal Femur / Proximal Tibia:
The Distal Femur / Proximal Tibia Module of the MEGASYSTEM-C® contain the following components:
- Distal Femoral Components ●
- Femoral Components ●
- Femoral Segments
- . Support Ring, Terminals
- Stem Segments ●
- Connection Components (rotating and non-rotating hinge)
- Proximal Tibial Components (Tibial plateau)
- . Tibial Components (Tibial plateau)
- Proximal Tibial Spacers ●
- Modular Stems ●
- . Coupling for diaphyseal spacer
- Coupling Components Knee Fusion Nail, modular ●
# Total Femur
Replacement of the Total Femur is accomplished by combining the following components of the MEGASYSTEM-C®:
- . Proximal Femoral Components (Neck segments)
- Coupling Components ●
- Distal Femoral Components ●
- Connecting Components (rotating and non-rotating hinge)
- Stem Segments
- Proximal Tibial Components (Tibial plateau) ●
- Tibial Components (Tibial plateau) ●
- Modular Stems ●
- Push-through Stems .
{6}------------------------------------------------
Due to its high modularity, the system allows partial bone replacements both in the proximal and distal femur in small increments as well as a total replacement of the femur. For the knee joint components, the Endo-Model® SL® Rotating Hinge Knee is used in the MEGASYSTEM-C®.
The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is produced of Cobalt Chromium Molybdenum casting alloy (CoCrMo) and Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE/noncrosslinked). The Modular Stems (cemented) and the Pushthrough stems are made of Cobalt Chromium Molybdenum casting alloy (CoCrMo) materials. The Modular Stems (cementless) are made of Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium alloy (Ti-6A1-4V) materials.
Stem Segments, Coupling for diaphyseal spacer and Support Ring are produced of Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V). Coupling components and the knee fusion nail are made of Cobalt Chromium Molybdenum casting alloy (CoCrMo) materials.
Femoral Segments and Proximal Tibial Spacers are produced of Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) and respectively of Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE/non-crosslinked).
The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is intended to be used with the components of the Endo-Model® SL® Rotating and Non-Rotating Hinge Knee or Endo-Model® Knee System (#K143179) which can be integrated for knee joint replacement and with the MP® Reconstruction Prosthesis (#K142187) for hip replacement.
> The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is indicated for treatment of any of the following Limb salvage/Oncology procedures:
- 1) Revision for loosened femoral prosthesis components involving extensive bone loss;
- 2) Surgical intervention for severe trauma;
- 3) Oncology cases where extensive resection and replacement of bone is required from tibia to hip area;
The device is to be used with bone cement unless a proximal femur or a modular stem is indicated for use.
For the use of the LINK® Endo-Model® SL® Rotating and Non-Rotating Hinge Knee System additional indications should be noted:
Indications for Use:
{7}------------------------------------------------
- 1) Bone necroses.
- 2) Bicondylar arthrosis by partly damaged collateral ligaments.
- Revision after primary total knee replacement. 3)
- Revision surgery after hinge knee or rotational knee 4) ioint.
- 5) Revision surgery by insufficient / inadequate bone mass.
- Arthrosis of patella flange. 6)
- Valgus/Varus deformities <10°. 7)
- 8) Valgus/Varus deformities 10-15°.
- 9) Valgus/Varus deformities 15-20°.
For the use of the LINK® Endo-Model® SL® Non-Rotating Hinge Knee System additional indications should be noted:
- 10) Bicondylar arthrosis by damaged ligaments and muscular instability.
- 11) Valgus/Varus deformities 20-30°.
Comparison to Predicate Device: The LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is substantially equivalent to the commercially available device GMRS™ Global Modular Replacement System in that both have same intended use and similar indications, design, materials, technological characteristics, and principles of operation. The minor technological differences between the LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® and its predicate device raise no new issues of safety or effectiveness. Performance data demonstrate that the LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is as safe and effective as the GMRS™ Global Modular Replacement System. Both devices are intended for cemented use. In addition the LINK® | MEGASYSTEM-C® provides cementless modular stems. Thus, LINK® the MEGASYSTEM-C® is substantially equivalent.
#### Performance Data: Non-Clinical Performance and Conclusions:
Non-Clinical performance testing was conducted with consideration to Draft Guidance For The Preparation of Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) for cemented, semiconstrained Total Knee Prostheses, April 1993, Guidance Document for Knee and metal/polymer femorotibial uncemented Prostheses, January 16, 2003 and Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Non-Clinical Information for Femoral Stem Prosthesis, September 17, 2007.
Non-clinical performance testing included: Tibial Bearing Component wear test per ISO 14243-1 and -2 including tibiofemoral contact area / stress analyses at different angles of flexion; Tibial Baseplate Component fatigue test per ISO
{8}------------------------------------------------
14879 and ASTM F1800; femoral neck segment fatigue test per ISO 7206-6; femoral stem fatigue test per ISO 7206-4; proximal femoral components fatigue test per ASTM F2580; Modular Connections, Fretting, and Corrosion Testing per ASTM F1875-98; and Range of Motion analyses of the MEGASYSTEM-C® and Endo-Model® SL® Knee System.
Constraint testing is not applicable to a constrained prosthesis. This test was not necessary.
All Endo-Model® SL® Knee System test samples completed the 10 million cycles Tibial Baseplate Fatigue Strength testing without evidence of fracture or cracking.
The results of non-clinical performance testing demonstrate that the device is as safe, as effective, and substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
#### Clinical Performance and Conclusions:
There was no clinical performance testing required for this device.
The subject device LINK® MEGASYSTEM-C® is Conclusion: substantially equivalent to the predicate device identified in this premarket notification.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.