Patient samples were used to perform a method comparison against a predicate device and to establish reference ranges for the assay in a healthy adult population.
Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc. Whole PTH (1-84) Specific immunoradiometric (IRMA) assay
Linear regression analysis (Passing & Bablok)
Observational study of healthy adults
Apparently healthy adults (21-70 years of age) from mixed ethnic backgrounds; Sample Size: 249 (125 EDTA plasma, 124 serum)
Not applicable for this study
Establishment of 95% reference limits
Indications for Use
The DiaSorin LIAISON® 1-84 PTH Assay is an in vitro chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) intended for the quantitative determination of parathyroid hormone (1-84) in human serum and EDTA plasma. Measurements of parathyroid hormone levels are used in the differential diagnosis of hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia resulting from disorders of calcium metabolism. The test has to be performed on the LIAISON® Analyzer. The DiaSorin LIAISON® 1-84 PTH Control Set is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as assayed quality control samples to monitor the accuracy and precision of the LIAISON® 1-84 PTH Assay. The DiaSorin LIAISON® 1-84 PTH Calibration Verifiers are assayed quality control materials intended for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative verification of calibration and reportable range of the LIAISON® 1-84 PTH Assay.
Device Story
Modified two-step, two-site sandwich chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for quantitative measurement of 1-84 parathyroid hormone (PTH) in human serum or EDTA plasma; utilizes two goat polyclonal antibodies for capture and detection. Performed on LIAISON® Analyzer; light signal measured by photomultiplier as relative light units (RLU) proportional to analyte concentration. Results determined via 2-point calibration conversion of master curve to working curve. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel to assist in differential diagnosis of calcium metabolism disorders. Provides quantitative PTH levels to clinicians for diagnostic decision-making; aids in patient management of hypercalcemia/hypocalcemia.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance validated via precision/reproducibility (20-day study, n=160), linearity (0.3-2044 pg/mL), limit of detection (1.7 pg/mL), and limit of quantitation (4.0 pg/mL). Interference and cross-reactivity studies confirmed specificity. Method comparison against predicate (n=193) showed strong correlation (r=0.9812). Reference range established using 125 healthy adults.
Indicated for quantitative determination of parathyroid hormone (1-84) in human serum and EDTA plasma to aid in differential diagnosis of hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia resulting from disorders of calcium metabolism.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A parathyroid hormone test system is a device intended to measure the levels of parathyroid hormone in serum and plasma. Measurements of parathyroid hormone levels are used in the differential diagnosis of hypercalcemia (abnormally high levels of calcium in the blood) and hypocalcemia (abnormally low levels of calcium in the blood) resulting from disorders of calcium metabolism.
Predicate Devices
Whole PTH™ (1-84) Specific immunoradiometric (IRMA) assay (K001411)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k150879
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Parathyroid Hormone
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Chemiluminescent Immunoassay
E. Applicant:
DiaSorin Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Control Set
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Calibration Verifiers
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1545
21 CFR 862.1660
2. Classification:
Class II
Class I, reserved
3. Product code:
CEW
JJX
{1}
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The DiaSorin LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay is an in vitro chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) intended for the quantitative determination of parathyroid hormone (1-84) in human serum and EDTA plasma. Measurements of parathyroid hormone levels are used in the differential diagnosis of hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia resulting from disorders of calcium metabolism. The test has to be performed on the LIAISON® Analyzer family.
The DiaSorin LIAISON 1-84 PTH Control Set is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as assayed quality control samples to monitor the accuracy and precision of the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay.
The DiaSorin LIAISON 1-84 PTH Calibration Verifiers are assayed quality control materials intended for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative verification of calibration and reportable range of the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use on the LIAISON Analyzer
I. Device Description:
1. LIAISON 1-84 PTH Reagent Integral contains the following components:
- Magnetic particles - coated with goat polyclonal antibody against 1-84 PTH, stabilizers and preservatives; 2.4 mL.
- Conjugate - Goat polyclonal antibody conjugated to an isoluminol derivative, with PBS, BSA and preservatives; 12 mL.
- Assay buffer - phosphate buffer containing BSA, blockers and preservatives; 25 mL.
- Calibrators, 2 Levels, containing equine serum, synthetic 1-84 PTH at 2 different concentrations, stabilizers and preservatives; 2 vials each level; lyophilized.
2
{2}
2. LIAISON 1-84 PTH Control Set contains:
2 levels of controls containing human plasma spiked with 1-84 PTH, stabilizers and preservatives; 4 vials each level; lyophilized. The target values of the controls are listed below:
Level 1: 30 pg/mL
Level 2: 260 pg/mL
3. LIAISON 1-84 PTH Calibration Verifier Set contains:
4 levels of pooled human plasma spiked with 1-84 PTH with preservative,
1 vial each level, lyophilized. The target values of the calibration verifiers are listed below:
Level 1: 10 pg/mL
Level 2: 80 pg/mL
Level 3: 400 pg/mL
Level 4: 1450 pg/mL
The Calibration Verifier Set and Control Set package insert labeling includes the following disclaimer:
Each serum/plasma donor unit used in the preparation of this product has been tested by a U.S. FDA approved method and found non-reactive for the presence of the antibody to Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 and 2 (HIV 1/2), the Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and the antibody to Hepatitis C (HCV). While these methods are highly accurate, they do not guarantee that all infected units will be detected. This product may also contain other human source diseases for which there is no approved test.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc., Whole PTH (1-84) Specific
DiaSorin LIAISON N-TACT PTH Control Set
DiaSorin LIAISON N-TACT PTH Calibration Verifiers
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k001411
k033426
k093498
3. Comparison with predicate:
{3}
LIASON® 1-84 PTH Assay
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device
LIASON® 1-84 PTH Assay | Predicate Device
Whole PTH (1-84) Specific
(k001411) |
| Intended Use | Intended for the in vitro quantitative determination of parathyroid hormone (1-84) in human serum. | Same |
| Antibody | Goat polyclonal | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
LIASON® 1-84 PTH Assay | Predicate
Whole PTH (1-84) Specific
(k001411) |
| Methodology | Chemiluminescent
Immunoassay | Immunoradiometric assay |
| Sample type | EDTA Plasma and Serum | EDTA Plasma |
| Measuring range | 4.0 - 1880 pg/mL | 0-2300 pg/mL |
| Reference range | EDTA plasma: 5.72-45.4 pg/mL
Serum: 5.68-47.8 pg/mL | 5.0- 39 pg/mL |
LIASON® 1-84 PTH Control Set
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device
LIASON® 1-84 PTH Control Set | Predicate Device
DiaSorin LIAISON N-TACT PTH Control Set
(k033426) |
| Intended Use | Intended for use as assayed quality control samples to monitor the accuracy and precision of the PTH assay. | Same |
| Storage | Store at 2-8°C | Same |
| Levels | 2 levels: lyophilized | Same |
| Concentration | Level 1: 30 pg/mL
Level 2: 260 pg/mL | Level 1: 60 pg/mL
Level 2: 560 pg/mL |
{4}
LIAISON® 1-84 PTH Calibration Verifiers
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device
LIAISON® 1-84 PTH
Calibration Verifiers | Predicate Device
DiaSorin LIAISON
N-TACT PTH
Calibration Verifiers
(k093498) |
| Intended Use | Assayed quality control materials intended for the quantitative verification of calibration and reportable range of the PTH assay. | Same |
| Storage | Store at 2-8°C | Same |
| Levels | 4 levels: lyophilized | Same |
| Concentration | Level 1:10 pg/mL
Level 2: 80 pg/mL
Level 3:400 pg/mL
Level 4:1450 pg/mL | Level 1:20 pg/mL
Level 2:150 pg/mL
Level 3: 350 pg/mL
Level 4:1500 pg/mL |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP6-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP7-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP9-A3, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-Third Edition
CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline
CLSI C28-A3, How to Define and Determine Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline-Third Edition
{5}
6
L. Test Principle:
The LIAISON 1-84 PTH assay is a modified two-step, two-site sandwich assay that uses two polyclonal antibodies for capture and detection of the 1-84 PTH molecule. The assay uses 150 µL of human serum or EDTA plasma incubated with and isoluminol conjugated polyclonal antibody with high specificity for the N-terminus of the 1-84 peptide. Following incubation, paramagnetic particles coated with a second polyclonal antibody that binds to the C-terminal region of the 1-84 molecule are added to the reaction and incubated. The design of these antibodies is intended to detect the whole intact 1-84 PTH with no cross reactivity to fragments such as the 7-84 PTH fragment. After the second incubation, the unbound material is removed with a wash cycle. The starter reagents are then added and a flash chemiluminescent reaction is initiated. The light signal is measured by a photomultiplier as relative light units (RLU) and is proportional to the concentration of 1-84 PTH present in the calibrators, controls or samples.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A twenty day reproducibility precision study was performed at DiaSorin Inc. A coded panel comprised of 7 frozen EDTA plasma samples spanning the assay range, and the 2 levels of LIAISON 1-84 PTH controls (lyophilized human plasma) were tested using two reagent lots, in two replicates per run, 2 runs per day for 20 days on one LIAISON Analyzer for a total of 160 replicate results per sample. The 20 day results are summarized for the combined reagent lot numbers below:
| | | Between-lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample n=160 | Mean PTH (pg/mL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Control1 | 30.2 | 1.02 | 3.4% | 1.52 | 5.0 % |
| Control 2 | 305.6 | 9.86 | 3.2% | 14.08 | 4.6 % |
| EDTA 1 | 11.8 | 0.37 | 3.2% | 1.23 | 10.4% |
| EDTA 2 | 18.7 | 0.78 | 4.1% | 1.45 | 7.7% |
| EDTA 3 | 35.2 | 0.87 | 2.5% | 2.03 | 5.8% |
| EDTA 4 | 176.5 | 5.67 | 3.2% | 6.69 | 3.8% |
| EDTA 5 | 399.6 | 12.56 | 3.1% | 18.2 | 4.6% |
| EDTA 6 | 1124.7 | 37.89 | 3.4% | 50.62 | 4.5% |
| EDTA 7 | 1743.9 | 47.97 | 2.8% | 101 | 5.8% |
{6}
The two lots of assay reagent demonstrated similar precision results. The precision of one representative lot is summarized in the table below:
| Sample n=80 | Mean (pg/mL) | Intra-Run | | Run-to-Run | | Day-to-Day | | Total (Within-lot) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Control 1 | 29.5 | 1.08 | 3.6% | 0.72 | 2.4% | 0.71 | 2.4% | 1.48 | 5.0% |
| Control 2 | 298.7 | 8.35 | 2.8% | 6.86 | 2.3% | 8.09 | 2.7% | 13.50 | 4.5% |
| EDTA 1 | 11.6 | 1.27 | 11.0% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.46 | 4.0% | 1.24 | 10.7% |
| EDTA 2 | 18.2 | 1.19 | 6.5% | 0.89 | 4.9% | 0.50 | 2.8% | 1.57 | 8.6% |
| EDTA 3 | 34.5 | 1.43 | 4.1% | 0.73 | 2,1% | 1.10 | 3.2% | 1.94 | 5.6% |
| EDTA 4 | 172.5 | 4.68 | 2.7% | 3.04 | 1.8% | 3.79 | 2.2% | 6.74 | 3.9% |
| EDTA 5 | 309.8 | 10.72 | 2.7% | 8.68 | 2.2% | 2.71 | 0.7% | 14.06 | 3.6% |
| EDTA 6 | 1097.9 | 27.17 | 2.5% | 39.81 | 3.6% | 15.65 | 1.4% | 50.68 | 4.6% |
| EDTA 7 | 1710.0 | 47.11 | 2.8% | 77.24 | 4.5% | 23.45 | 1.4% | 93.46 | 5.5% |
O
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
One sample pool of each sample type, serum and EDTA plasma, was spiked with PTH 1-84 to achieve PTH levels above the measuring range of the assay and then was diluted with a low patient sample of the same sample type to obtain intermediate PTH concentrations. The low sample was further diluted with specimen diluent which contains no PTH to levels near the claimed LoQ of the assay. Each of the resulting 19 concentrations, ranging from 0.3-2044 pg/mL for EDTA and 0.2-1802 pg/mL for serum, were analyzed by the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay in replicates of three. The results were analyzed by a regression of observed mean PTH concentration versus expected PTH concentration. The resulting equations for each sample type are shown below:
Serum: $y = 0.9992x - 0.0835$ , $R^2 = 0.9976$
EDTA plasma: $y = 0.9679x - 3.328$ , $R^2 = 0.9971$
The linearity results for both serum and EDTA plasma support the claimed measuring range of this assay (4.0-1800 pg/mL).
## c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
### Traceability:
The LIAISON 1-84 PTH Calibrators and Calibration Verifiers concentrations are traceable to an in-house standard preparation containing synthetic human PTH (1-84).
{7}
8
# Stability:
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Kit Calibrators: A real-time stability study determined the shelf life of the lyophilized LIAISON 1-84 PTH kit calibrators to be 18 months when stored at 2-8°C. Stability studies demonstrated that the open-vial stability of the reconstituted LIAISON 1-84 PTH calibrators is 2 hours at room temperature and onboard the analyzer. The sponsor indicated in the labeling that the calibrators should be stored frozen at -20°C if not used within 2 hours after reconstitution. The LIAISON 1-84 PTH kit calibrators are stable for 8 weeks when stored frozen at -20°C and can be used though 1 freeze-thaw cycle. The stability study protocol and the acceptance criteria have been found acceptable.
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Calibration Verifiers: A real-time stability study determined the shelf life of the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Calibration Verifiers to be 6 months when stored at 2-8°C. A real-time study to determine shelf-life is ongoing. Open-vial stability of the reconstituted LIAISON 1-84 calibration verifiers is 2 hours at room temperature and onboard the analyzer. The sponsor indicated in the labeling that the calibration verifiers should be stored frozen at -20°C if not used within 2 hours after reconstitution. They are stable for 14 days at -20°C and can be used through one freeze-thaw cycle. The stability study protocol and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Control Set: The shelf life of the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Control Set is 6 months when stored at 2-8°C as determined by real-time shelf life stability studies. Stability studies demonstrated that the open-vial stability of the reconstituted LIAISON 1-84 PTH Control Set is 2 hours when stored at room temperature. The sponsor indicated in the labeling that the calibrators should be stored frozen at -20°C if not used within 2 hours after reconstitution. Controls are stable for 8 weeks when stored at -20°C and can be used though 1 freeze-thaw cycle. The stability study protocol and the acceptance criteria have been found acceptable.
# Value Assignment:
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Kit Calibrators: A minimum of 5 vials of each level of calibrator are tested on a minimum of 3 LIAISON Analyzers, using 2 different LIAISON 1-84 PTH assay kit lots, in a minimum of 5 assay runs with 6 replicates per vial resulting in a minimum of 30 individual replicate results per calibrator level. The calibrator values must fall within a pre-specified range and the target value is lot specific. An example calibrator lot has the following target values::
Calibrator 1: 33.2 pg/mL
Calibrator 2: 1340 pg/mL
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Controls: A minimum of 10 vials of each level of control are tested on a minimum of 3 LIAISON Analyzers, using 2 different LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay kit lots, in a minimum of 5 assay runs over 10 days with 4 replicates per vial
{8}
resulting in a minimum of 40 individual replicate results per control. The mean, standard deviation and %CV for each level of kit control is calculated and the median value must be within 5% of the calculated mean. The controls have the following target values for PTH (1-84) and control range is established using the mean ±2SD:
Control level 1: Mean = 30 pg/mL, control range: 21.0-39.0 pg/mL; Control level 2: Mean = 260 pg/mL, control range: 198-322 pg/mL
LIAISON 1-84 PTH Calibration Verifiers: A minimum of 12 vials of each level of calibration verifier are tested on a minimum of 4 LIAISON Analyzers, using 2 different approved LIAISON 1-84 PTH assay kit lots, in a minimum of 6 assay runs with four replicates per vial resulting in a minimum of 48 individual replicate results. The calibrator verifiers have the following target values for PTH (1-84) and the verifier range is established using the mean ±2SD:
Cal verifier A: Mean = 10 pg/mL, range: 7.00 -13.0 pg/mL
Cal verifier B: Mean = 80 pg/mL, range: 56.0 - 104 pg/mL
Cal verifier C: Mean = 400 pg/mL, range: 304 -496 pg/mL
Cal verifier D: Mean = 1450 pg/mL, range: 1218-1682 pg/mL
d. Detection limit:
Limit of Blank (LoB):
Five blank samples, consisting of 1-84 Calibrator matrix (charcoal stripped horse serum) were tested with the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay on two analyzers, with two reagent lots and two operators over six runs (2 replicates/sample/run) on three days for a total of 60 results per reagent lot. The equation used for the determination of LoB is as follows: $$ \text{LoB} = \mu (\text{blank dose}) + 1.653 * \sigma (\text{blank dose}) $$ The LoB is 0.3 pg/mL
Limit of Detection (LoD):
Four human EDTA plasma samples and four human serum samples in the range of the mean LoB to 4 times the mean LoB were tested with the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay on two analyzers, with two reagent lots and two operators over six runs (2 replicates/sample/run) on three days for a total of 96 results per sample type. LoD was calculated for both serum and plasma samples for each of the 2 reagent lots using the following equation:
$$ \text{LoD} = \mu (\text{blank dose}) + 1.653 * \sigma (\text{blank dose}) * \sigma (\text{sample Dose}) $$ The LoD for EDTA plasma samples is 1.6 pg/mL. The LoD for serum samples is 0.80 pg/mL.
Limit of Quantitation (LoQ):
Nine human EDTA plasma samples and nine human serum samples in the range of 0.3 to 12 pg/mL were tested with the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay on two analyzers, with two reagent lots and two operators over six runs (2 replicates/sample/run) on three days for a total of 144 results per sample type. LoQ value was determined
{9}
based on a fitted curve where concentration of PTH has a $\% \mathrm{CV}$ of $20\%$ . The LoQ for EDTA plasma samples is $3.4~\mathrm{pg / mL}$ . The LoQ for serum samples is $0.84~\mathrm{pg / mL}$ .
The limit of detection and limit of quantitation results for EDTA plasma and serum are summarized in the table below:
| Sample type | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- |
| EDTA Plasma | 1.6 pg/mL | 3.4 pg/mL |
| Serum | 0.80 pg/mL | 0.84 pg/mL |
The sponsor is claiming the following assay detection limits for both EDTA plasma and serum samples:
| LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0.5 pg/mL | 1.7 pg/mL | 4.0 pg/mL |
The claimed measuring range of the assay for both sample types is $4.0 - 1880\mathrm{pg / mL}$
# e. Analytical specificity:
An interference study was performed based on CLSI EP7-A2 guideline to assess common or known substances that could interfere with the measurement of PTH. The potential interferents listed below were spiked into two human EDTA plasma samples with 1-84 PTH concentrations of $40~\mathrm{pg / mL}$ and $70~\mathrm{pg / mL}$ . The two sets of matched spiked and unspiked samples were tested in 12 replicates with one lot of reagent. Significant interference was defined as greater or equal to $\pm 10\%$ difference from the expected concentration. The interference study results are summarized in the following table:
| Potential Interferent | Highest Tested Concentration at which no significant interference (≤±10%) was observed |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin, conjugated | 40 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin, unconjugated | 20 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 500 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 3000 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 500 mg/dL |
| Albumin | 12 g/dL |
| HAMA | 4088 ng/mL |
| Rheumatoid factor | 5380 IU/mL |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dL |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | 65 mg/dL |
| Salicylic Acid | 60 mg/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 0.1 μg/dL |
{10}
The assay package insert labeling states the following: Grossly hemolyzed or lipemic samples should not be tested.
Cross reactivity study: Testing was performed to assess the cross-reactivity of the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay with other PTH fragments as well as structurally similar proteins. Potential cross reactants, each at a concentration of $200,000~\mathrm{pg / mL}$ , were spiked into LIAISON1-84 PTH Specimen Diluent (horse serum-based zero sample) and tested. The PTH fragments were tested in triplicate using one lot of reagent; and the calcitonin, osteocalcin, and C-telopeptide cross-reactants were tested in quadruplicate with a different kit lot of the assay. The equation used to calculate $\%$ cross reactivity is as follows:
(Mean conc. of spiked sample - Mean conc. of the original sample) X 100 Spiked Concentrations
The following table summarizes the cross-reactivity of PTH fragments and structurally similar proteins with the LIAISON 1-84 PTH assay:
| Substance | Spiked concentration | % Cross Reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- |
| hPTH 7-84 | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00105% |
| hPTH 1-34 | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00005% |
| hPTH 13-34 | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00020% |
| hPTH 39-68 | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00090% |
| hPTH 44-68 | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00055% |
| hPTH 39-84 | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00050% |
| Calcitonin | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00008% |
| Osteocalcin | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00005% |
| C-Telopeptide (β-crosslaps) | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00001% |
| C-Tolopentadiene | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.000005% |
| C-Tolopentadienoate | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.000001% |
| C-Tolopentadienoate 1,4-dioxane | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.0000005% |
| C-Tolopentadienoate 1,4-dioxane 2,4-dioxane | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.0000001% |
| C-Tolopentadienoate 2,4-dioxane 2,4-dioxane 2,4-dioxane | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.00000005% |
| C-Tolopentadienoate 2,4-dioxane 2,4-dioxane | 200,000 pg/mL | 0.000000005% |
{11}
Hook Effect Study: Testing was performed to determine if the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay is susceptible to falsely low results in the presence of very high levels of PTH. Three serum and 3 EDTA plasma samples were spiked with 1-84 PTH equal to several concentrations above the assay measuring range of $1800~\mathrm{pg / mL}$ . The spiked samples were run in triplicate. No high dose hook effect was observed at 1-84 PTH concentrations measured up to $60,000~\mathrm{pg / mL}$ .
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A method comparison study was performed following CLSI EP9-A3. The samples tested consisted of 186 native EDTA plasma samples and 7 spiked samples for a total of 193 samples. The mean of duplicate results for the comparator assay, Scantibodies Laboratory Whole PTH (1-84) Specific, and singlicate results for the LIAISON 1-84 PTH Assay were compared. Passing and Bablok linear regression analyses were performed and the following results were obtained:
LIASON 1-84 PTH Assay vs. Scantibodies Laboratory Whole PTH (1-84) Specific
| n | Slope | 95% CI | Intercept | 95% CI | r | Result range (pg/mL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 193 | 0.9810 | 0.9497-1.0204 | -2.23 | -5.29 to -0.61 | 0.9812 | 6.3-1707 |
b. Matrix comparison:
A matrix comparison study was performed on 188 matched human sample sets of EDTA plasma and serum. A total of 8 samples were spiked in order to span the claimed measuring range. Each sample type was tested in singlicate using one reagent lot. The matrix comparison analysis resulted in the following equation:
$$
y = 1.05x + 0.14 \left( y = \text{serum}, x = \text{EDTA plasma} \right), R^2 = 0.9981
$$
The study supports EDTA plasma and serum sample types for use with the LIAISON 1-84 PTH assay.
The sponsor includes the following limitation regarding sample type in the assay
{12}
package insert: "The type of specimen used (serum or EDTA plasma) may influence PTH measurements. During routine monitoring of PTH levels, use the same specimen type throughout the monitoring period to avoid bias in the results."
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
To establish the expected reference range for the LIAISON 1-84 PTH assay, matched pairs of EDTA plasma and serum samples from 125 apparently healthy adults, comprised of 91 females and 34 males, ages 21-70 years old were tested. Subjects tested had normal concentrations of 25OH vitamin D, TSH, total calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, creatinine, and alkaline phosphatase. The Reference range for the LIAISON 1-84 PTH was determined from 125 EDTA samples (91 females and 34 males) and 124 serum samples (90 females and 34 males). Based on the parametric method with 95% reference limit, the following reference range values were established:
| Sample type | N | Median PTH (pg/mL) | Observed Range 2.5^{th} to 97.5^{th} Percentile |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDTA plasma | 125 | 25.0 | 5.72-45.4 pg/mL |
| Serum | 124 | 25.2 | 5.68-47.8 pg/mL |
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.