The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of the Dario Blood Glucose Test Strips. Dario Glucose Control Solutions and the Dario App as the display component of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System. The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening of diabetes or for neonatal use. The Dario Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the Dario Blood Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip. The Dario Glucose Control Solutions are for use with the Dario Blood Glucose Meter and the Dario Blood Glucose Test Strips to check that the meter and test strips are working together properly and that the test is performing correctly.
Device Story
Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS) measures glucose in fresh capillary whole blood. System includes meter, lancing device, test strips, control solutions, and mobile app. Meter connects to smart mobile device via 3.5mm audio jack for power and data transmission. User inserts test strip, applies blood sample; glucose oxidase reaction generates electrical current; meter processes current via internal algorithm; result displayed on mobile app. Used at home by single patient for diabetes management. Provides quantitative glucose readings to inform diabetes control decisions. Benefits include compact, integrated design and mobile-based tracking.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance evaluated in a study of 100 diabetic lay users. Participants performed fingerstick tests compared against YSI 2300 reference method. For glucose < 75 mg/dL, 100% of results were within ±15 mg/dL. For glucose ≥ 75 mg/dL, 98.9% of results were within ±20% of reference. Linear regression: y = 0.992x + 2.782, r² = 0.9967. Usability questionnaire showed 94% of users found the device easy to operate.
Technological Characteristics
Amperometric glucose oxidase biosensor. Powered via 3.5mm audio jack of smart mobile device. Dimensions/form factor: integrated meter/lancing device. Connectivity: wired to mobile device. Software: mobile app display. Standards: IEC 61010-1, EN 61010-2-101, EN 61326-1, EN 61326-2-6, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60068, ISO 15197:2003.
Indications for Use
Indicated for self-testing of blood glucose levels in people with diabetes to monitor diabetes control. For in vitro diagnostic use with fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertip. Contraindicated for neonatal use, diagnosis or screening of diabetes, and testing of arterial or venous blood. Not for use by critically ill patients, or those in shock, dehydrated, or hyperosmolar states.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K150817
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Glucose in fresh capillary whole blood obtained from the fingertip
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Amperometric Assay (Glucose Oxidase)
E. Applicant:
Labstyle Innovations Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1345, Glucose Test System
21 CFR § 862.1660; Quality Control Material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II, Class I (exempt)
3. Product code:
NBW, CGA, JJX
4. Panel:
{1}
Clinical Chemistry (75)
## H. Intended Use:
1. **Intended use(s):**
See Indications for Use below.
2. **Indication(s) for use:**
The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of the Dario Blood Glucose Meter, Dario Glucose Test Strips, Dario Glucose Control Solutions and the Dario App as the display component of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System. The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared.
The Dari Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Dari Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening of diabetes or for neonatal use.
The Dario Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the Dario Blood Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip.
The Dario™ Glucose Control Solutions are for use with the Dario™ Blood Glucose Meter and the Dario™ Blood Glucose Test Strips to check that the meter and test strips are working together properly and that the test is performing correctly.
3. **Special conditions for use statement(s):**
- For Over-the-Counter use
- Single-patient use only
- Not for testing glucose levels of neonates
- Not for the diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes
- Not for testing glucose levels of arterial or venous blood
- Not for testing glucose from sites other than the fingertip
- Not for testing patients critically ill, in shock, dehydrated or hyperosmolar
4. **Special instrument requirements:**
Dario Blood Glucose Meter
Apple platform Smart Mobile Device, with iOS 6.1 or above
{2}
3
I. Device Description:
The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of the Dario Blood Glucose meter (dongle), 25 Dario Test Strips housed in a disposable cartridge (sold separately), lancets (sold separately), Dario Control Solution Levels 1 and 2 (sold separately), Disposable Covers (for the mobile devices), User Manual and Quick User Guide, the Dario Application Software (needs to be downloaded from App Store or Google Play). The Dario BGMS can be used with Apple platform smart mobile devices, with operating system versions iOS 6.2 or above. The Dario Control solutions were previously cleared in k082683 as SD Check Gold and are renamed in this submission.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Gmate SMART Blood Glucose Monitoring System; Philosys, Inc.
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K131230
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System | Predicate Gmate SMART Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K131230) |
| Indication For Use | Intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary blood samples by people with diabetes at home to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control | Same |
| Assay Detection Method | Amperometry | |
| Enzyme | Glucose Oxidase | |
| Measuring Range | 20-600 mg/dL | |
| Hematocrit Range | 20-60% | Same |
| Altitude | 10,000 feet | Same |
| Coding | Not required | Same |
| Display | Connected to smart-device or mobile device to display measurement results | Same |
| Power Source | Powered by audio phone | Same |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System | Predicate Gmate SMART Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K131230) |
| | jack connected to smartphone or mobile device | |
| Operating System | iOS | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Sample volume | 0.3 μL | 0.5 μL |
| Test time | 6 sec | 5 sec |
| Sample type | Fingertip | Fingertips, forearm, upper arm, palm, thigh or calf |
| Temperature Range | 50-113°F (10-45°C) | 50-104°F (10-40°C) |
| Dimensions LxWxH (mm) | 40.2 x 16.1 x 9.8 | 43 x 21 x 9 |
| Weight (g) | 4.0 | 4.2 |
| Software Application | Dario App | Gmate SMART App |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
ISO 10993-1:2003, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process.
EN 13640, Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagent
IEC 61010-1:2001, Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use – Part 1: General Requirements.
EN 61326-1:2006, Electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use – EMC requirements part 1: General requirements.
EN 61326-2-6, Electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use - EMC requirements Part 2-6: Particular requirements – In vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical equipment
IEC 61010-2-101:2002, Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use – Particular requirements for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Equipment.
IEC 60068-2-64:1993, Environmental testing Part 2: Test methods – Test Fh: vibration, broad-band random (digital control) and guidance.
CLSI EP6-A:2005, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline
{4}
CLSI EP7-A2:2003, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline.
## L. Test Principle:
The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System measures glucose electrochemically. The glucose biosensor is capable of recognizing the glucose present in whole blood or control solutions by virtue of the glucose specificity of the enzyme glucose oxidase present on the glucose test strip. A voltage is applied and the glucose concentration is calculated by the meter from the electrical current. The final results are communicated to the smart mobile device through the audio jack.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The sponsor performed within-run precision studies using venous whole blood spiked to five (5) different glucose concentration ranges (30 to 50, 51 to 110, 111 to 150, 151 to 250, and 251 to 400 mg/dL). Fifty (50) samples were prepared at each glucose level, and each sample was analyzed in duplicate for a total of 100 results per glucose level. Results were collected using three (3) test strip lots and 10 meters. Results are summarized below:
Within-run precision for glucose:
Test Strip Lot 1
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Number of tests | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30 to 50 | 100 | 48.3 | 1.1 | 2.4 |
| 51 to 110 | 100 | 74.7 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| 111 to 150 | 100 | 172.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 151 to 250 | 100 | 216.0 | 6.7 | 3.1 |
| 251 to 400 | 100 | 344.2 | 5.6 | 1.6 |
Test Strip Lot 2
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Number of tests | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30 to 50 | 100 | 47.6 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 51 to 110 | 100 | 73.7 | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| 111 to 150 | 100 | 125.4 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| 151 to 250 | 100 | 213.1 | 3.4 | 1.6 |
| 251 to 400 | 100 | 339.2 | 6.7 | 2.0 |
{5}
Test Strip Lot 3
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Number of tests | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30 to 50 | 100 | 47.8 | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| 51 to 110 | 100 | 73.7 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 111 to 150 | 100 | 126.3 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 151 to 250 | 100 | 214.4 | 5.1 | 2.4 |
| 251 to 400 | 100 | 346.0 | 7.6 | 2.2 |
Between-day precision was evaluated using three levels of glucose control solutions with concentrations 30 to 50, 96 to 144, and 280 to 420 mg/dL. Per day, each sample was measured with three (3) test strip lots and 10 meters. These tests were performed over 10 days, for a total of 300 results per glucose level. Results are summarized below:
Between-day precision for glucose:
Test Strip Lot 1
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Number of tests | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | % CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30 to 50 | 100 | 48.9 | 2.5 | 5.2 |
| 96 to 144 | 100 | 103.0 | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| 280 to 420 | 100 | 294.5 | 7.0 | 2.4 |
Test Strip Lot 2
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Number of tests | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | % CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30 to 50 | 100 | 48.7 | 2.3 | 4.7 |
| 96 to 144 | 100 | 104.8 | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| 280 to 420 | 100 | 296.7 | 8.6 | 2.9 |
Between-day precision for glucose:
Test Strip Lot
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Number of tests | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | % CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30 to 50 | 100 | 48.0 | 2.0 | 4.2 |
| 96 to 144 | 100 | 103.9 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| 280 to 420 | 100 | 295.5 | 5.4 | 1.8 |
{6}
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity was evaluated in 2 studies:
Linearity in Study #1 was evaluated using three (3) test strip lots and 11 mixed pools of venous blood with glucose concentrations at 16, 86, 157, 230, 301, 367, 438, 510, 578, 649 and 728 mg/dL, as measured by the YSI reference method.
Linearity in Study #2 was evaluated at low concentrations, using three (3) test strip lots and six (6) mixed pools of venous blood with glucose concentrations at 16, 37, 57.5, 78.4, 99.2 and 118.8 mg/dL as measured by the YSI reference method. In both studies, each level was measured in replicates of five (5) with each of three (3) test strip lots and the values from the Dario™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System were compared with those obtained from the YSI-2300. Results from the combined regression analysis are as follows:
$$
y = 1.008x - 1.459, r^2 = 0.998
$$
The results of the study support the sponsor’s claimed glucose measurement range of 20-600 mg/dL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
The Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System is traceable to NIST SRM 917b. The method comparison study was performed using the candidate device and YSI as the reference method (see Section 2.a. above)
Test Strip Stability:
Test strip stability was assessed in accelerated and real-time studies. The testing protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The manufacturer claims shelf life stability of 24 months and an open-vial stability of 6 months at the recommended storage conditions of 36°F-90°F (2°C-32°C) and 10-90% relative humidity. The instructions state not to refrigerate open test strip cartridges or put test strips in a freezer.
Control Solution Value Assignment and Stability:
The Dario Glucose Control Solutions Level 1 and Level 2 were previously cleared (k082683). The control solutions offered are Level 1 (range 90-140 mg/dL) and Level 2 (range 170-240 mg/dL). The value assignment protocol and the stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed under k082683. The control solutions are stable for 24 months and for 3 months after opening when stored at the recommended storage conditions of 46°F-86°F (8°C-30°C) and 10-90% humidity.
d. Detection limit:
See linearity study in Section M1b above.
{7}
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were performed by spiking venous blood with two levels of glucose concentrations (65 and 250 mg/dL). Each of these samples was divided into a test pool and a control pool and each potential endogenous and exogenous interfering substance was added to the test pool. Each substance was tested at three concentrations. Each sample was analyzed 10 times with the Dario meter and the % difference between the individual measurements and the reference (YSI) calculated. The sponsor defines no significant interference as ≤10% difference relative to YSI. Results are presented in the table below:
| Potential Interfering Substances Tested | Concentration with no Significant Interference (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 6 mg/dL |
| Acetyl-salicylic acid | 120 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid (Vit. C) | 4 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 35 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 506 mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 30 mg/dL |
| Dopamine | 2.5 mg/dL |
| Ethanol | 400 mg/dL |
| Fructose | 15 mg/dL |
| Galactose | 60 mg/dL |
| Gentisic Acid | 1.8 mg/dL |
| Glutathione | 4.6 mg/d |
| Hemoglobin | 200 mg/dL |
| Heparin | 0.003 mg/dL (3000 U/L) |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
| Lactose | 25 mg/dL |
| Levodopa | 4 mg/dL |
| Maltose | 132mg/dL |
| Maltotetraose | 120 mg/dL |
| Maltotriose | 240 mg/dL |
| Mannitol | 800 mg/dL |
| Mannose | 5 mg/dL |
| Methyl-Dopa | 2 mg/dL |
| Sodium Fluoride | 200 mg/dL |
| Sodium Salicylate | 63 mg/dL |
| Sorbitol | 10 mg/dL |
| Tetracycline | 5 mg/dL |
| Tolazamide | 5 mg/dL |
| Tolbutamide | 100 mg/dL |
{8}
| Triglyceride | 900 mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Urea | 500 mg/dL |
| Uric Acid | 11 mg/dL |
| Warfarin | 1 mg/dL |
| Xylitol | 25 mg/dL |
| Xylose | 50 mg/dL |
The following limitations have been added to the labeling:
If you are taking acetaminophen containing drugs (e.g. Tylenol) or Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) you may get inaccurate results with this system.
If you have a disease or condition in which uric acid levels in your blood may be elevated (>11 mg/dL), such as gout, you may get inaccurate results with this system.
If you have very high levels of triglyceride (>810mg/dL), you may get inaccurate results with this system.
This system should not be used when undergoing xylose absorption tests.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
See lay user study in section M.3.c
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
To assess the performance of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System in the
{9}
hands of the intended users the sponsor performed a study with 100 diabetic lay user participants. Participants obtained and tested their own fingerstick samples with the Dario BGMS. Blood glucose results from the Dario meter obtained by the lay user were compared to the YSI 2300 reference value. The samples ranged from 24 to 479 mg/dL as measured by YSI. The results are summarized in the tables below:
## Lay-user vs. YSI:
For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4/11 (36.4%) | 9/11 (81.8%) | 11/11 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations ≥ 75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 39/89 (43.8%) | 68/89 (76.4%) | 85/89 (95.5%) | 88/89 (98.9%) |
Results of linear regression analysis:
$$
y = 0.992x + 2.782, r^2 = 0.9967.
$$
Subject usability was assessed using a questionnaire. 94% of subjects reported the operation of the meter to be average, easy, or very easy. 90% of subjects reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the meter.
Flesch-Kincaid readability assessment was conducted and the results demonstrated that the User Manual, quick start guide, test strip package insert and control solution package insert were written at an 8th grade level or less.
## 4. Clinical cut-off
Not applicable
## 5. Expected values/Reference range:
Expected glucose values without diabetes:
| Status | Range |
| --- | --- |
| Before eating (FPG) | <100 mg/dL |
| Two hours after meals | <140 mg/dL |
American Diabetes Association: Standard of Medical Care in Diabetes 2015, Diabetes Care, vol.38, supplement 1, S14-S87, 2015.
{10}
11
N. Instrument Name:
Dario Blood Glucose Meter
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The glucose test is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger, palm, and forearm only. The whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip by capillary action.
5. Calibration:
There is no calibration required by the user for the DA12-B1 and DA12-B2 blood glucose meters. The meters are automatically coded.
6. Quality Control:
Two levels of glucose control solutions are available with this system, but are sold separately. Recommendations on when to test the control materials are provided in the labeling. The user is cautioned not to use the meter if the control result falls outside these ranges.
{11}
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
1) Hematocrit Study: The effect of different hematocrit levels on the performance of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System was evaluated using venous whole blood samples with hematocrit levels of 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 and 65% spiked with glucose to achieve three (3) concentrations at 50-70, 100-200, and 250-300 mg/dL. Each sample was then tested using 10 Dario Meters and three (3) lots of test strips. The values were compared with those obtained from YSI 2300 analyzer. The % biases relative to YSI were acceptable within the claimed hematocrit range of 20 to 60%.
2) Altitude study: Capillary fingerstick samples with glucose concentrations ranging from 48 to 423.5 mg/dL were collected from 52 participants at 10,152 feet above sea level. Results were obtained from each participant sample in on the Dario for each of 3 test strip lots compared to additional fingerstick samples measured on the YSI. The results demonstrate acceptable bias to YSI to support the claims in the labeling that altitudes up to 10,000 feet (3048 meters) have no significant effect on blood glucose measurements from the Dario meter.
3) Sample volume study: The sponsor performed a study to support the claimed minimum sample volume for the Dario system. Blood samples with three levels of glucose (50-65, 100-120, and 200-250 mg/dL) were tested at six sample volumes (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.75, 0.8, and 1.0 µL) and values obtained were compared to YSI values. Results support the claimed minimum sample volume of 0.3 µL.
4) Temperature and humidity studies: The sponsor performed temperature and humidity studies using venous blood samples at five glucose concentrations (approximately 60, 110, 200, 300, and 475 mg/dL) to evaluate temperatures ranging from 12±2°C to 43±2°C and relative humidity from 10% to 90%. Meter results were compared to YSI values. Six temperature and humidity combinations were tested including low temperature/low humidity, low temperature/high humidity, average temperature/low humidity, average temperature/high humidity, high temperature/low humidity, and high temperature/high humidity. The results support the claims in the labeling that the system can be used in conditions of 50 to 113°F (10 to 45°C) with relative humidity of 10 to 90%.
5) Infection Control Studies: The device is intended for single-patient use only. Super Sani-Cloth wipes with EPA registration #9480-4 were validated demonstrating complete inactivation of live hepatitis B virus for use with the test strips cartridge cap, Dario meter and Dario BGMS housing device. The sponsor also demonstrated that there was no change in performance or in the external materials of the test strips cartridge cap, Dario meter and Dario BGMS housing device after 156 cleaning and disinfection cycles (one cycle includes one cleaning wipe plus one disinfecting wipe) to simulate 3 years of single-patient use. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
12
{12}
6) EMC testing was certified and appropriate compliance certificates were provided.
7) Customer service is available Monday through Friday 9:00 am to 5:00 pm PST by calling 1-800-895-5921.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
1. The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.