2.5mm Insite FT Suture Anchors , 3.5mm Insite FT Suture Anchors
K150715 · Tornier, Inc. · MBI · Jul 28, 2015 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K150715
Device Name
2.5mm Insite FT Suture Anchors , 3.5mm Insite FT Suture Anchors
Applicant
Tornier, Inc.
Product Code
MBI · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jul 28, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3040
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The 2.5mm and 3.5mm Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchor is intended for total shoulder arthroplasty of the shoulder. The Tornier Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchors are intended for fixation of soft tissue to bone. The Tornier Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchors are intended for use in the following applications: 1. Shoulder: Rotator Cuff, Bankart and SLAP lesion repair, Bicens tenodesis, Acromio-Clavicular separation and Deltoid repair, Capsular shift and Capsulolabral reconstruction. 2. Foot/Ankle: Lateral and Medial stabilization, Achilles tendon and Metatarsal ligament repair, Hallux Valgus and Midfoot reconstruction. 3. Knee: Medial collateral and Lateral ligament repair, Patellar tendon and Posterior oblique ligament repair, Illiotibial band tenodesis. 4. Hand/Wrist: Scapholunate ligament, Radial collateral ligament and Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. 5. Elbow: Biceps tendon reattachment, Tennis elbow repair, Ulnar and Radial collateral ligament reconstruction.
Device Story
Bone implant device; PEEK-OPTIMA® material; fully threaded anchor design. Available in 2.5mm and 3.5mm sizes. Used by surgeons in orthopedic procedures to fix soft tissue to bone. Implanted via surgical insertion into bone; provides mechanical fixation for tendons and ligaments. Benefits patient by restoring anatomical integrity in shoulder, foot/ankle, knee, hand/wrist, and elbow repairs. Single-use device.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence demonstrated via non-clinical bench testing, including mechanical pull-out, cyclic load, and insertion torque testing, alongside successful cadaveric specimen evaluation.
Indicated for fixation of soft tissue to bone in shoulder, foot/ankle, knee, hand/wrist, and elbow orthopedic repairs. Applicable to patients requiring surgical soft tissue-to-bone reattachment or reconstruction.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener is a device intended to be implanted that consists of a stiff wire segment or rod made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and stainless steel, and that may be smooth on the outside, fully or partially threaded, straight or U-shaped; and may be either blunt pointed, sharp pointed, or have a formed, slotted head on the end. It may be used for fixation of bone fractures, for bone reconstructions, as a guide pin for insertion of other implants, or it may be implanted through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
Predicate Devices
Tornier Insite™ FT PEEK Knotless Suture Anchor (K110773)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three faces in profile, stacked one behind the other. The faces are rendered in a simple, abstract style.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
July 28, 2015
Tornier, Incorporated Ms. Kaitlyn Rainbow Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist 10801 Nesbitt Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55437
Re: K150715
Trade/Device Name: 2.5mm Insite Ft Suture Anchors , 3.5mm Insite Ft Suture Anchors Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3040 Regulation Name: Smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MBI Dated: June 19, 2015 Received: June 22, 2015
Dear Ms. Rainbow:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Kaitlyn Rainbow
quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
### 510(k) Number (if known) K150715
Device Name
2.5mm & 3.5mm Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchor
Indications for Use (Describe) ntended Use: The 2.5mm and 3.5mm Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchor is intended for total shoulder arthroplasty of the shoulder.
Indications for Use: The Tornier Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchors are intended for fixation of soft tissue to bone.
The Tornier Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchors are intended for use in the following applications:
1. Shoulder: Rotator Cuff, Bankart and SLAP lesion repair, Bicens tenodesis, Acromio-Clavicular separation and Deltoid repair, Capsular shift and Capsulolabral reconstruction.
2. Foot/Ankle: Lateral and Medial stabilization, Achilles tendon and Metatarsal ligament repair, Hallux Valgus and Midfoot reconstruction.
3. Knee: Medial collateral and Lateral ligament repair, Patellar tendon and Posterior oblique ligament repair, Illiotibial band tenodesis.
4. Hand/Wrist: Scapholunate ligament, Radial collateral ligament and Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.
5. Elbow: Biceps tendon reattachment, Tennis elbow repair, Ulnar and Radial collateral ligament reconstruction.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
Date Prepared: July 24, 2015
#### I. Administrative Information
| Name: | Tornier, Inc. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 10801 Nesbitt Avenue South<br>Bloomington, MN 55437 |
| Contact Person: | Kaitlyn Rainbow<br>Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Phone: | 952-426-7637 |
| Fax: | 952-426-7601 |
#### II. Device Information
Name of Device: Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchor Size 2.5mm & 3.5mm
Common Name: Fastener, Fixation, Non-degradable, Soft Tissue Classification Name: 21 CFR 888.3040, Smooth or treaded metallic bone fixation fastener Class II Regulatory Class: Product Code: MBI
#### III. Predicate Device Information
Tornier Insite™ FT PEEK Knotless Suture Anchor K110773 and Smith and Nephew 2.0PK Suture Anchor K081511.
#### IV. Device Description
The Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchor is a bone implant device intended for the fixation of soft tissue to bone. This device is a fully threaded PEEK-OPTIMA® anchor that is available in two sizes (2.5mm & 3.5mm) for use in a range of fixation applications.
#### V. Intended Use
The Tornier Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchor is intended for the fixation of soft tissue to bone.
#### VI. Indications for Use
The Tornier Insite FT PEEK Suture Anchors are intended for fixation of soft tissue to bone.
The Tornier Insite FT PEEK Knotless Suture Anchors are intended for use in the following applications:
{4}------------------------------------------------
- 1. Shoulder: Rotator Cuff, Bankart and SLAP lesion repair, Biceps tenodesis, Acromio-Clavicular separation and Deltoid repair, Capsular shift and Capsulolabral reconstruction.
- 2. Foot/Ankle: Lateral and Medial stabilization, Achilles tendon and Metatarsal ligament repair, Hallux Valgus and Midfoot reconstruction.
- 3. Knee: Medial collateral and Lateral collateral ligament repair, Patellar tendon and Posterior oblique ligament repair, Illiotibial band tenodesis.
- 4. Hand/Wrist: Scapholunate ligament, Radial collateral ligament and Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.
- 5. Elbow: Biceps tendon reattachment, Tennis elbow repair, Ulnar and Radial collateral ligament reconstruction.
This device is for single use.
#### VII. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
The Insite™ FT Suture Anchor has the same intended use and fundamental scientific technology as the predicate device. The design differences have been demonstrated to not affect safety or effectiveness or raise new issues of safety or effectiveness.
#### VIII. Performance Data
Non-clinical performance bench testing (mechanical testing) was performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate devices.
Non-clinical Performance Testing Summary for 2.5mm & 3.5mm Insite™ FT PEEK Suture Anchors
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Validation and/ or Verification<br>Method | Acceptance Value/Criteria | Verification and<br>Validation Results |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Mechanical Testing<br>(Suture Approximation and<br>Tensile Pull-out) | To exceed strength of predicate<br>device | Acceptable |
| Mechanical Testing<br>(Cyclic Load Test) | To meet the physiological loading<br>requirements | Acceptable |
| Mechanical Testing<br>(Anchor Insertion Torque and<br>Driver Torque to Failure Test) | To exceed the strength of the<br>expected loading requirements | Acceptable |
| Mechanical Testing<br>(Pull to Failure Testing) | To determine strength of predicate<br>device | Acceptable |
| Cadaver Lab Evaluation | Successful preparation in<br>cadaveric specimens | Acceptable |
#### IX. Clinical Study
Clinical studies were not required to demonstrate substantial equivalence between the subject device and the predicate device.
#### X. Conclusions
The Insite™ FT Suture Anchor size 2.5mm and 3.5mm described in this section has the same intended use and the same fundamental scientific technology as the cleared Insite™ FT Suture Anchor and Smith and Nephew 2.0PK Suture Anchor. Based on the testing presented for the design differences between the subject and predicate devices, Tornier concludes that subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.