K150637 · Aerin Medical, Inc. · GEI · Nov 19, 2015 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K150637
Device Name
Aerin Medical Wand Model FG011
Applicant
Aerin Medical, Inc.
Product Code
GEI · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Nov 19, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Aerin Medical Wand is indicated for use in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery for the coagulation of soft tissue in the nasal airway, to treat nasal airway obstruction by shrinking submucosal tissue.
Device Story
Handheld bipolar radiofrequency (RF) probe for ENT surgery; comprises handle, shaft, and treatment tip with bipolar electrodes and temperature sensor. Connects to external RF generator (460 kHz, 3-5W). Clinician inserts tip into nostril to deliver low-power RF energy to submucosal tissue; creates coagulative lesion; tissue fibroses and retracts during healing to reduce obstruction. Temperature sensor maintains target tissue at 50-70°C via feedback control. Used in clinical settings by ENT physicians. Benefits patient by shrinking nasal tissue to improve breathing.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, multi-center, non-randomized study (n=33 subjects, 59 nostril treatments). Primary endpoint: freedom from unanticipated serious adverse events (SAEs). Results: 0 SAEs reported. 88% of subjects showed clinically significant improvement in NOSE scores at 90 days. Endoscopic assessments confirmed healing progression. Performance compared to published literature for predicate device (82-88% improvement).
Technological Characteristics
Handheld bipolar RF probe; polymers and stainless steel construction. Biocompatible (ISO 10993). Radiation-sterilized, single-use. 460 kHz operating frequency. Integrated thermocouple for temperature feedback (50-70°C). Electrical safety per IEC 60601-1, 60601-2-2; EMC per IEC 60601-1-2. Packaging tested per ASTM D4169, F1980, F2096, F88.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with chronic nasal airway obstruction requiring ENT surgery for soft tissue coagulation in the nasal airway.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories is a device intended to remove tissue and control bleeding by use of high-frequency electrical current.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is often associated with healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 19, 2015
Aerin Medical Incorporated Scott Wolf, M.D. President and Chief Medical Officer 690 West Fremont Avenue, Unit 3 Sunnyvale, California 94087
Re: K150637
Trade/Device Name: Aerin Medical Wand Model FG011 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4400 Regulation Name: Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GEI Dated: October 23, 2015 Received: October 26, 2015
Dear Dr. Wolf:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976. the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Scott Wolf, M.D.
CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
> Sincerely yours, Joshua C. Mipper -S
For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
#### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K150637
Device Name Aerin Medical Wand Model FG011
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Aerin Medical Wand is indicated for use in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery for the coagulation of soft tissue in the nasal airway, to treat nasal airway obstruction by shrinking submucosal tissue.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/14)
Page 1 of 1
POC Putlishing Survices (101) 443-6740 EF
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The word "Aerin" is in a large, blue, sans-serif font. Below "Aerin" is the word "MEDICAL" in a smaller, gray, sans-serif font. To the right of the word "Aerin" is a cluster of green circles that are arranged in a gradient pattern.
# 510(k) Summary K150637
## Aerin Medical, Inc. Aerin Medical Wand (Model FG011)
This 510(k) Summary is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
#### General Information
| Company: | Aerin Medical, Inc |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter's<br>Address: | 690 W. Fremont Avenue, Unit 3<br>Sunnyvale, CA 94087 |
| Contact Person: | Scott Wolf, M.D.<br>President and Chief Medical Officer<br>Phone: 650-434-3247<br>Fax: 408-716-2438 |
| Date Prepared: | November 18, 2015 |
### Device Name
| Proprietary Name: | Aerin Medical Wand (Model FG011) |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Radiofrequency wand |
| Classification<br>Name: | Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | GEI |
| CFR Section: | 21 CFR 878.4400 |
#### Predicate Device
| Device Name: | ArthroCare ENTec ReFlex Wand |
|----------------|------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number: | K000778 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The word "Aerin" is in a large, bold, blue font, with the word "MEDICAL" in a smaller, thinner, black font underneath. To the right of the word "Aerin" is a cluster of green circles, with the circles getting progressively darker green from left to right.
### Device Description
The Aerin Medical Wand is a handheld bipolar radiofrequency (RF) probe designed for use in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery. The Wand comprises a handle, shaft and treatment tip. The treatment tip consists of an array of bipolar electrodes and a temperature sensor that allows for monitoring of tissue temperature during radiofrequency energy delivery. The Wand is connected, via a flexible cable, to a commercially-available RF generator (the ORA-50 S, cleared under K993854) meeting the following requirements: RF operating frequency of 460 kHz (± 5 kHz); bipolar low power (3 watts to 5 watts) RF energy delivery; and sensitive temperature control with low overshoot (50°C to 70°C).
All patient-contacting materials of the Aerin Medical Wand are polymers or stainless steel that have been shown to be biocompatible for short-term contact (less than 24 hours) with breached or compromised surfaces. The Wand is individually packaged and supplied radiation-sterilized for single use.
The Aerin Medical Wand is used in the treatment of patients experiencing chronic nasal airway obstruction. During a treatment procedure, the clinician inserts the tip of the Aerin Medical Wand into a patient's nostril to deliver low power RF energy to the target tissue of the nasal airway. Radiofrequency treatment of tissue creates a coagulative lesion which fibroses and retracts as it heals, thereby shrinking the tissue to lessen the degree of obstruction.
### Intended Use / Indications For Use
The Aerin Medical Wand is indicated for use in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery for the coagulation of soft tissue in the nasal airway, to treat nasal airway obstruction by shrinking submucosal tissue.
#### Summary of Technological Characteristics
The Aerin Medical Wand and the predicate device are both handheld electrode probes designed to connect to an RF generator, and both use bipolar RF energy to coagulate tissue in otorhinolaryngology procedures. Both devices are radiationsterilized and supplied to the user as sterile, single use devices. Patient-contacting materials in both devices have been shown to be biocompatible and suitable for short-term (less than 24 hours) surface contact. Electrical safety has been shown with both devices through testing to applicable IEC standards. The Aerin Medical Wand tip is placed on the nasal mucosa; low-power, temperature-controlled RF energy is delivered through the mucosal layer to the submucosal tissues. The tip of the predicate device penetrates the mucosal tissue so that the electrodes are in submucosal tissue during energy delivery. Although the energy-delivery electrodes and placement are different, bench testing has shown the resulting lesion volumes to be similar. The Aerin Medical Wand incorporates a temperature sensor to maintain target tissue temperature between 50 - 70℃, with the RF generator power limited to an output level selected by the clinician user. The predicate device is also designed to operate at a relatively low temperature (40 - 70°C), although it does not
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The logo features the word "Aerin" in a large, blue sans-serif font, with the word "MEDICAL" in a smaller, gray sans-serif font underneath. To the right of the word "Aerin" is a cluster of green circles, with the circles gradually decreasing in size and becoming darker in color from left to right.
employ a temperature feedback control mechanism. Thus, both systems are designed to create lesions with a similar heating temperature range, but the Aerin Medical system uses temperature feedback as a safety measure to ensure that the desired range is not exceeded.
### Performance Data - Bench Testing
Biocompatibility of the Aerin Medical Wand was demonstrated through testing performed in accordance with AAMI / ANSI / ISO standards 10993-1 (2009/(R) 2013), 10993-5 (2009/(R) 2014, 10993-10 (2010), 10993-11 (2006/(R) 2010), and 10993-12 (2012). Radiation sterilization was validated per AAMI / ANSI / ISO 11137-1 (2006/(R) 2010) and 11137-2 (2013). Electrical safety was demonstrated through testing to IEC 60601-1 (2005/(R) 2012) and 60601-2-2 (2009) and electromagnetic compatibility testing was performed according to IEC 60601-1-2 (2007). The packaging systems were subjected to transit testing, visual inspection, accelerated aging (equivalent to 1 year), gross leak detection and seal strength testing in accordance with the applicable ASTM standards (ASTM D4169-09, ASTM F1980-07, ASTM F2096-11, and ASTM F88/F88M-09), and met all acceptance criteria.
Device performance testing demonstrated that the product met all design requirements, including usability factors, thermocouple response time and tissue heating times. Thermal imaging of the treatment area, using different tissue types and thicknesses, showed that the heating within the treatment area is uniform, without significant variation or hot spots. Thermocouple array testing demonstrated the thermal consistency of the Wand's treatment area at the Wand/tissue interface. Additional ex vivo testing was performed to verify substantial equivalence to the predicate device in terms of thermal effects, and showed that the Aerin Medical Wand creates thermal lesion volumes that are comparable to volumes created with the predicate device.
### Performance Data – Pre-Clinical Testing
In vivo testing was conducted to evaluate the effects of temperature-controlled bipolar RF energy delivered to nasal tissue. Several combinations of energy delivery durations and target temperatures were used in order to assess relative safety of different parameter settings. The treatment sites were evaluated endoscopically post-procedure and at several time points out to 8 weeks. The treated tissue was evaluated histologically by a veterinary pathologist after 8 weeks of healing. Histological changes were determined to be absent, minimal or mild for tissue treated with 4 watts of power, delivered up to 18 seconds, with a target temperature 60°C or less.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The word "Aerin" is in a large, blue, sans-serif font. Below it, in a smaller, gray, sans-serif font, is the word "MEDICAL". To the right of the word "Aerin" are several green circles of varying sizes.
#### Clinical Performance Data
A prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, non-significant risk clinical study was conducted in the United States to confirm safety and effectiveness in a population presenting with a history of poor nasal breathing or chronic nasal obstruction. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from unanticipated serious adverse events (SAEs) directly attributable to the Aerin Medical Wand. Technical feasibility evaluated the ability of the Wand to deliver RF energy to the target tissue. Additional evaluations included change in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score between baseline and 90-days post-procedure, and physician evaluation of the tissue healing progression.
Thirty-three (33) subjects with complaints of chronic nasal obstruction were enrolled in the study; all received treatment of the nasal airway with the Aerin Medical device. A total of 47 nostrils were treated in the 33 subjects' index procedures. Ten (10) subjects had repeat treatment (12 nostrils), for a total of 59 nostril treatments in the study.
One of the subjects was lost-to-follow-up after the 30-day follow-up, at which time the subject reported no adverse events and had experienced a clinically significant 25-point improvement in his NOSE score. The safety endpoint was met since there were no SAEs reported in the study. With the exception of one subject who experienced a common cold one month following treatment, all other adverse events were observations anticipated as a result of thermal treatment of tissue and the resulting healing process. External photographs of each treated nostril revealed no changes in outward appearance, confirming that the energy was delivered only to the internal tissue as needed. Endoscopic intranasal assessments indicated limited tissue disruption following treatment with the Aerin Medical Wand, and demonstrated a progression in healing and nasal obstruction improvement during the 90-day follow-up period. At 90 days, a clinically significant improvement was reported in 88% of subjects, as assessed with the NOSE scale.
Clinical performance data were not required to obtain clearance of the predicate device. As such, the clinical performance data obtained with the subject device were compared to the published literature on the predicate device. In general, reported complications with the predicate device have been minor, such as temporary bleeding, post-procedure edema or nasal obstruction, crusting, or mucosal tears.
In terms of effectiveness, improvement has been reported with the use of the predicate device in 82 to 88% of subjects. The clinical evaluation of the Aerin Medical Wand also demonstrated very minimal complications of the types observed with the predicate device, and a clinically significant improvement in 88% of subjects, as assessed with the NOSE scale. Visual and endoscopic intranasal assessments demonstrated a progression in healing similar to that reported in the literature for the predicate device.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Aerin Medical. The word "Aerin" is in a large, bold, blue font. Below "Aerin" is the word "MEDICAL" in a smaller, thinner, gray font. To the right of the word "Aerin" are several green circles of varying sizes.
### Substantial Equivalence
All testing demonstrates that the Aerin Medical Wand system performs as intended, and complies with performance standards applicable to radiofrequency systems (including biocompatibility, electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility). As described in previous sections, the Aerin Medical Wand is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in that both devices utilize handheld bipolar electrode probes, connected to RF generators, to coagulate tissue in otorhinolaryngology procedures. Bench testing has shown that the lesion volumes created by the two systems are similar, despite the differences between the subject device and predicate device (e.g. energy-delivery electrode shape, placement of the probe relative to the target tissue, control mechanisms incorporated in the RF generators). Clinical performance testing with the Aerin Medical Wand indicated a level of clinical improvement comparable to that cited in the medical literature for the predicate device. Thus, through evaluation of device comparisons, bench testing and clinical performance testing, the Aerin Medical Wand has been demonstrated to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device and is as safe and effective for its intended use.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.