K150485 · Osprey Medical, Inc. · DXT · Mar 26, 2015 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K150485
Device Name
AVERT Contrast Modulation System
Applicant
Osprey Medical, Inc.
Product Code
DXT · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Mar 26, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1650
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System is intended to be used for the controlled infusion of radiopaque contrast media for angiographic procedures with the following agents: Iodixanol 270 or 320 mgl/mL, Iohexol 300 or 350 mgI/mL and Iopamidol 300 or 370 mgI/mL.
Device Story
AVERT Contrast Modulation System modulates contrast media during manual injections for coronary/peripheral imaging; consists of reusable non-sterile contrast modulator and disposable sterile modulation reservoir with 4-way stopcock/extension line. Modulator applies mechanical force to reservoir via internal mechanism; force adjustable by pin position on housing to control contrast diversion. Device mounted on wheeled stand near patient, outside sterile field. Used by clinicians to reduce contrast volume delivered to patient during angiography; benefits include potential reduction in contrast-induced nephropathy risk.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical testing performed. Bench testing only, including flow rate, pressure reduction, contrast diversion, mechanical cycle testing, sterilization validation (ISO 11135-1:2007), shelf-life/shipping (ASTM D4169), and biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1:2009).
Technological Characteristics
Reusable contrast modulator with adjustable spring-loaded mechanical force mechanism; disposable sterile modulation reservoir; 4-way stopcock; extension line. Sterilization via Ethylene Oxide (ISO 11135-1:2007). Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1:2009. Standalone mechanical device; no software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for controlled infusion of radiopaque contrast media (Iodixanol, Iohexol, Iopamidol) during coronary or peripheral angiographic procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a non-patient contacting balloon inflation syringe intended only to inflate/deflate balloon catheters and monitor pressure within the balloon, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo is a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an image of three human profiles facing right, with a stylized design above them that resembles an eagle or bird in flight.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 26, 2015
Osprey Medical, Inc. Ms. Melanie Hess Sr. Director, Regulatory Affairs 5600 Rowland Road, Suite 250 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
Re: K150485
Trade/Device Name: AVERT Contrast Modulation System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1650 Regulation Name: Angiographic Injector and Syringe Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DXT Dated: February 23, 2015 Received: February 24, 2015
Dear Ms. Hess:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
M.A. Hillebrenner
for
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number: K150485
Device Name: AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System
### Indications for Use:
The AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System is intended to be used for the controlled infusion of radiopaque contrast media for angiographic procedures with the following agents: Iodixanol 270 or 320 mgl/mL, Iohexol 300 or 350 mgI/mL and Iopamidol 300 or 370 mgI/mL.
Prescription Use X (Per 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
510(k) Summary As required by 21CFR 807.92(c)
# 510(k) Number: K150485
- Date Prepared:
February 12, 2015
Submitter's Name/Address:
Osprey Medical 5600 Rowland Road Suite 250 Minnetonka, MN 55343
Contact Person:
Melanie Hess Sr. Director, Regulatory Affairs Tel: 952-955-8252 Fax: 952-955-8171 Mhess @ospreymed.com
### Device Information:
| Trade Name/Proprietary Name: | AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Injector and Syringe, Angiographic |
| Classification Registration: | 21 CFR § 870.1650 |
| Product Code: | DXT |
| FDA Center/Branch: | CDRH/Interventional Cardiology Devices Branch (ICDB) |
## Device Description:
The Osprey Medical AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System allows for the modulation of contrast media during manual injections in coronary or peripheral imaging procedures. The AVERT System consists of a reusable, non-sterile apparatus (contrast modulator), which a force to a disposable sterile modulation reservoir with a standard, off-the-shelf 4-way stopcock and extension line. The contrast modulator utilizes an internal mechanism to apply a force to the modulation reservoir; allowing for modulated diversion of manual contrast injections. The force can be easily and quickly adjusted by moving the location of the pin as identified on the outer housing of the system, thereby increasing or
{4}------------------------------------------------
decreasing the amount of force applied to the modulation reservoir. The contrast modulator is attached to a wheeled stand and is positioned near the patient, outside of the sterile field.
### Indications for Use:
The AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System is intended to be used for the controlled infusion of radiopaque contrast media for angiographic procedures with the following agents: Iodixanol 270 or 320 mgI/mL, Iohexol 300 or 350 mgI/mL and Iopamidol 300 or 370 mgI/mL.
### Predicate Device:
| Trade Name/Proprietary Name: | AVERT Contrast Modulation System |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Injector and Syringe, Angiographic |
| Classification Registration: | 21 CFR § 870.1650 |
| Product Code: | DXT |
| 510(k) number(s) | K140425 |
## Comparison to the Predicate Device:
The AVERT™ System is substantially equivalent and unchanged from the predicate AVERT™ System in that they are identical systems with the exception of the minor modification to include a new AVERT™ System model number, RMS-ISOV-300-C, with a new spring component. No modifications to performance specifications have been made. The subject device is identical to the predicate in that:
- . The proposed device consists of the same material; and
- . No changes have been made to the product performance specifications, sterilization process, manufacturing processes or risk assessment; and
- The intended use, indications for use and fundamental scientific technology remains unchanged. .
The fundamental scientific technology, materials, sterilization process, manufacturing processes and risk assessment are unchanged from the predicate. The intended use and indications for use statement are unchanged from the predicate device. No new or different questions of safety or effectiveness are raised with the proposed modification.
# Summary of Non-Clinical Testing:
Bench testing was performed or leveraged from the predicate to support the AVERT™ System and results demonstrate the AVERT" System meets product specification and performance requirements. The following testing was successfully completed:
{5}------------------------------------------------
- Device performance testing included flow rate, peak pressure reduction, contrast diversion and . flow rate adjustability. Testing was leveraged from the predicate for mechanical cycle testing, image analysis and compatibility to Osprey Medical Contrast Monitoring System. All testing passed and demonstrated product performance met all prior established acceptance criteria.
- Sterilization conditions have been validated and leveraged from the predicate in accordance with . ISO 11135-1:2007, Sterilization of health care products – Ethylene Oxide Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices to provide a Sterility Assurance Level of 10-6. All testing passed.
- Simulated use (animal) and post-market design validation was performed and leveraged from the . predicate. Testing included assessment of injection pressure, contrast diversion, image analysis. Testing demonstrated no new or different question of safety or effectiveness were raised.
- Shelf-life, distribution and shipping testing was performed and leveraged from the predicate per . ASTM D4169. Testing included visual inspection, cycle testing, dye leak test, seal strength test and functional testing. All testing passed and demonstrated product performance met all prior established acceptance criteria.
- Biocompatible testing was performed and leveraged from the predicate in accordance with ISO . 10993-1:2009 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing. Testing included cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation (intracutaneous reactivity), systemic toxicity, hemocompatibility, genotoxicity, chemical characterization. All testing passed and meet prior established acceptance criteria.
All test results demonstrate that the materials, manufacturing processes and design of the Osprey Medical AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System meet the established performance criteria and will perform as intended.
No performance standards have been established under Section 514 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for angiographic injectors and syringes.
### Clinical Testing:
No clinical testing was performed to support this Special 510(k) Premarket Notification.
## Statement of Equivalence:
The AVERT™ System with the proposed modification is substantially equivalent in intended use, indications for use and method of operation to the predicate AVERT" System. Based on the substantially
{6}------------------------------------------------
equivalent assessment and data collected in accordance with Osprey Medical Quality System Procedure in compliance with EN ISO 13485:2003 Medical Devices – Quality management systems – requirements for regulatory purposes and EN ISO 14971: 2012 Risk management for medical devices, the AVERT™ System has been shown to be substantially equivalent under 21 CFR Part 807 subpart E.
{7}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
510(k) Summary As required by 21CFR 807.92(c)
# 510(k) Number: K150485
- Date Prepared:
February 12, 2015
Submitter's Name/Address:
Osprey Medical 5600 Rowland Road Suite 250 Minnetonka, MN 55343
Contact Person:
Melanie Hess Sr. Director, Regulatory Affairs Tel: 952-955-8252 Fax: 952-955-8171 Mhess @ospreymed.com
### Device Information:
| Trade Name/Proprietary Name: | AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Injector and Syringe, Angiographic |
| Classification Registration: | 21 CFR § 870.1650 |
| Product Code: | DXT |
| FDA Center/Branch: | CDRH/Interventional Cardiology Devices Branch (ICDB) |
## Device Description:
The Osprey Medical AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System allows for the modulation of contrast media during manual injections in coronary or peripheral imaging procedures. The AVERT System consists of a reusable, non-sterile apparatus (contrast modulator), which a force to a disposable sterile modulation reservoir with a standard, off-the-shelf 4-way stopcock and extension line. The contrast modulator utilizes an internal mechanism to apply a force to the modulation reservoir; allowing for modulated diversion of manual contrast injections. The force can be easily and quickly adjusted by moving the location of the pin as identified on the outer housing of the system, thereby increasing or
{8}------------------------------------------------
decreasing the amount of force applied to the modulation reservoir. The contrast modulator is attached to a wheeled stand and is positioned near the patient, outside of the sterile field.
### Indications for Use:
The AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System is intended to be used for the controlled infusion of radiopaque contrast media for angiographic procedures with the following agents: Iodixanol 270 or 320 mgI/mL, Iohexol 300 or 350 mgI/mL and Iopamidol 300 or 370 mgI/mL.
### Predicate Device:
| Trade Name/Proprietary Name: | AVERT Contrast Modulation System |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Injector and Syringe, Angiographic |
| Classification Registration: | 21 CFR § 870.1650 |
| Product Code: | DXT |
| 510(k) number(s) | K140425 |
## Comparison to the Predicate Device:
The AVERT™ System is substantially equivalent and unchanged from the predicate AVERT™ System in that they are identical systems with the exception of the minor modification to include a new AVERT™ System model number, RMS-ISOV-300-C, with a new spring component. No modifications to performance specifications have been made. The subject device is identical to the predicate in that:
- . The proposed device consists of the same material; and
- . No changes have been made to the product performance specifications, sterilization process, manufacturing processes or risk assessment; and
- The intended use, indications for use and fundamental scientific technology remains unchanged. .
The fundamental scientific technology, materials, sterilization process, manufacturing processes and risk assessment are unchanged from the predicate. The intended use and indications for use statement are unchanged from the predicate device. No new or different questions of safety or effectiveness are raised with the proposed modification.
# Summary of Non-Clinical Testing:
Bench testing was performed or leveraged from the predicate to support the AVERT™ System and results demonstrate the AVERT" System meets product specification and performance requirements. The following testing was successfully completed:
{9}------------------------------------------------
- Device performance testing included flow rate, peak pressure reduction, contrast diversion and . flow rate adjustability. Testing was leveraged from the predicate for mechanical cycle testing, image analysis and compatibility to Osprey Medical Contrast Monitoring System. All testing passed and demonstrated product performance met all prior established acceptance criteria.
- Sterilization conditions have been validated and leveraged from the predicate in accordance with . ISO 11135-1:2007, Sterilization of health care products – Ethylene Oxide Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices to provide a Sterility Assurance Level of 10-6. All testing passed.
- Simulated use (animal) and post-market design validation was performed and leveraged from the . predicate. Testing included assessment of injection pressure, contrast diversion, image analysis. Testing demonstrated no new or different question of safety or effectiveness were raised.
- Shelf-life, distribution and shipping testing was performed and leveraged from the predicate per . ASTM D4169. Testing included visual inspection, cycle testing, dye leak test, seal strength test and functional testing. All testing passed and demonstrated product performance met all prior established acceptance criteria.
- Biocompatible testing was performed and leveraged from the predicate in accordance with ISO . 10993-1:2009 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing. Testing included cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation (intracutaneous reactivity), systemic toxicity, hemocompatibility, genotoxicity, chemical characterization. All testing passed and meet prior established acceptance criteria.
All test results demonstrate that the materials, manufacturing processes and design of the Osprey Medical AVERT™ Contrast Modulation System meet the established performance criteria and will perform as intended.
No performance standards have been established under Section 514 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for angiographic injectors and syringes.
### Clinical Testing:
No clinical testing was performed to support this Special 510(k) Premarket Notification.
## Statement of Equivalence:
The AVERT™ System with the proposed modification is substantially equivalent in intended use, indications for use and method of operation to the predicate AVERT" System. Based on the substantially
{10}------------------------------------------------
equivalent assessment and data collected in accordance with Osprey Medical Quality System Procedure in compliance with EN ISO 13485:2003 Medical Devices – Quality management systems – requirements for regulatory purposes and EN ISO 14971: 2012 Risk management for medical devices, the AVERT™ System has been shown to be substantially equivalent under 21 CFR Part 807 subpart E.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.