Simplexa Group A Strep Direct, Simplexa Group A Strep Positive Control Pack
K143651 · Focus Diagnostics, Inc. · PGX · Mar 18, 2015 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K143651
Device Name
Simplexa Group A Strep Direct, Simplexa Group A Strep Positive Control Pack
Applicant
Focus Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
PGX · Microbiology
Decision Date
Mar 18, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.2680
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Focus Diagnostics Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay is intended for use on the 3M Integrated Cycler for the in vitro qualitative detection of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) from throat swabs collected from human patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis, such as sore throat. This test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of GAS infection. The assay is intended for use in hospital, reference, or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use. Focus Diagnostics' Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack is intended to be used as a control with Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct. This control is not intended for use with other assays or systems.
Device Story
Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct is a real-time PCR assay for qualitative detection of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) bacterial DNA from throat swabs. It eliminates the need for nucleic acid extraction. The system uses the 3M Integrated Cycler, Direct Amplification Disc (DAD), and associated accessories. Bi-functional fluorescent probe-primers target the conserved pyroqenic exotoxin B gene (speB) for GAS identification; an internal control (DNA IC) monitors for PCR failure or inhibition. The device is operated by laboratory personnel in hospital, reference, or state laboratory settings. Output is a qualitative detection result (Detected/Not Detected). Healthcare providers use this result as an aid in diagnosing GAS infection to inform clinical management. The device benefits patients by providing rapid, direct molecular detection of GAS without manual extraction.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective clinical study (n=1352 evaluable specimens) compared Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct to culture. Sensitivity was 97.4% (95% CI: 93.6% - 99.0%) and specificity was 95.2% (95% CI: 93.9% - 96.3%). Discrepant analysis performed via bi-directional sequencing. Analytical studies included precision, reproducibility, inclusivity (21 strains), cross-reactivity (64 organisms), and interference testing. Contrived matrix validation confirmed equivalence to clinical matrix.
Indicated for qualitative detection of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) nucleic acids from throat swabs in symptomatic patients with signs of pharyngitis (e.g., sore throat). For prescription use only in hospital, reference, or state laboratory settings. Not for point-of-care use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A Streptococcus spp. nucleic acid-based assay is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic device intended to simultaneously detect and identify various Streptococcus spp. nucleic acids extracted directly from clinical specimens. The device detects specific nucleic acid sequences for organism identification. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Streptococcus and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Pathogenic streptococci are associated with infections, such as sore throat, impetigo (an infection characterized by small pustules on the skin), urinary tract infections, rheumatic fever, and kidney disease.
Special Controls
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: 1) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed device description documentation, including the device components, ancillary reagents required but not provided, and a detailed explanation of the methodology including primer/probe sequence, design, and rationale for sequence selection. 2) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from the following analytical and clinical performance studies: Analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection), reactivity, inclusivity, precision, reproducibility, interference, cross reactivity, carry-over, and cross contamination. 3) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from a clinical study. The study, performed on a study population consistent with the intended use population, must compare the device performance to results obtained from well-accepted reference methods. 4) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation for device software, including, but not limited to, software applications and hardwarebased devices that incorporate software. 5) Premarket notification submissions must include database implementation methodology, construction parameters and quality assurance protocols, as appropriate. 6) The device labeling must include limitations regarding the need for culture confirmation of negative specimens, as appropriate. 7) A detailed explanation of the interpretation of results and acceptance criteria must be included in the device's 21 CFR 809.10(b)(9) compliant labeling. 8) Premarket notification submissions must include details on an end user device training program that will be offered while marketing the device, as appropriate.
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed device description documentation, including the device components, ancillary reagents required but not provided, and a detailed explanation of the methodology including primer/probe sequence, design, and rationale for sequence selection.
(2) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from the following analytical and clinical performance studies: Analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection), reactivity, inclusivity, precision, reproducibility, interference, cross reactivity, carry-over, and cross contamination.
(3) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from a clinical study. The study, performed on a study population consistent with the intended use population, must compare the device performance to results obtained from well-accepted reference methods.
(4) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation for device software, including, but not limited to, software applications and hardware-based devices that incorporate software.
(5) Premarket notification submissions must include database implementation methodology, construction parameters, and quality assurance protocols, as appropriate.
(6) The device labeling must include limitations regarding the need for culture confirmation of negative specimens, as appropriate.
(7) A detailed explanation of the interpretation of results and acceptance criteria must be included in the device's 21 CFR 809.10(b)(9) compliant labeling.
(8) Premarket notification submissions must include details on an end user device training program that will be offered while marketing the device, as appropriate.
Predicate Devices
Lyra™ Direct Strep Assay (k133883)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K143651
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a substantial equivalence determination for the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct and Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack from throat specimens.
C. Measurand:
Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus (GAS; Streptococcus pyogenes) nucleic acids.
D. Type of Test:
The Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct and Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack (Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct) assay is a Real-Time PCR in vitro diagnostic test for the rapid and qualitative detection and differentiation of Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) nucleic acids isolated from throat swab specimens obtained from symptomatic patients.
E. Applicant:
Focus Diagnostics, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct and Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.2680 - Streptococcus spp. Nucleic Acid-Based Assay
2. Classification:
Class II
{1}
2
3. Product code:
PGX – Groups A, C and G Beta-Hemolytic Streptococcus Nucleic Acid Amplification System
OOI – Real-Time Nucleic Acid Amplification System
4. Panel:
83- Microbiology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct
The Focus Diagnostics Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay is intended for use on the 3M Integrated Cycler for the in vitro qualitative detection of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) from throat swabs collected from human patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis, such as sore throat. This test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of GAS infection. The assay is intended for use in hospital, reference, or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use.
Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack
Focus Diagnostics’ Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack is intended to be used as a control with Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct. This control is not intended for use with other assays or systems.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as intended use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
3M Integrated Cycler
I. Device Description:
The Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay system is a real-time PCR system that enables the direct amplification and qualitative detection of Group A Strep bacterial DNA from throat swabs that have not undergone a nucleic acid extraction. The system consists of the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay, the 3M Integrated Cycler (with Integrated Cycler Studio Software), the Direct Amplification Disc (DAD) and associated accessories.
In the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay, bi-functional fluorescent probe-primers are
{2}
used together with corresponding reverse primers to amplify Group A Strep bacterial DNA and the Internal Control (DNA IC). The assay targets a conserved region of Group A Strep (pyrogenic exotoxin B gene) to identify this bacteria in the specimen. The DNA IC is used to detect PCR failure and/or inhibition.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Lyra™ Direct Strep Assay
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k133883
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct | Lyra™ Direct Strep Assay (k133883) |
| Intended Use | Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct The Focus Diagnostics Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay is intended for use on the 3M Integrated Cycler for the in vitro qualitative detection of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) from throat swabs collected from human patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis, such as sore throat. This test is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of GAS infection. The assay is intended for use in hospital, reference, or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use. Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack Focus Diagnostics' Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack is intended to be used as a | The Lyra Direct Strep Assay is a Real-Time PCR in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection and differentiation of Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) and pyogenic Group C and G β-hemolytic Streptococcus nucleic acids isolated from throat swab specimens obtained from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis, such as a sore throat. The assay does not differentiate between pyogenic Groups C and G β-hemolytic Streptococcus. All negative test results should be confirmed by bacterial culture, because negative results do not preclude Group A, C or G Strep infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment. The assay is intended for use in |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct | Lyra™ Direct Strep Assay (k133883) |
| | control with Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct. This control is not intended for use with other assays or systems. | hospital, reference, or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use. |
| Sample Type | Throat swab | Same |
| Testing Time | 60 minutes | Same |
| DNA Amplification Technology | Real-time polymerase chain reaction | Same |
| Detection Techniques | Automatically detects fluorescence after dissociation of fluorophore from quencher during amplification | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Extraction | Self-contained and automated | Manual |
| Target Sequence Detected | Well conserved region of the exotoxin B gene (speB) | Group A – 99bp product in the putative competence (comX1.1) gene Groups C/G – 188bp product in the tagatose-6-phosphate kinase (lacC) gene |
| Reagents/ Components | Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct Reaction Mix Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack Direct Amplification Disks | Lyra™ Direct Strep Master Mix, Process Buffer, and Rehydration Solution ABI 7500 Fast Dx 96-well PCR Plate, optical plate films and plate centrifuge Dry heating block |
| Instrument | 3M Integrated Cycler | ABI 7500 Fast DX Thermocycler |
| Performance Characteristics | GAS* Sensitivity: 97.4%[95% CI: 93.6% - 99.0%] GAS* Specificity: 95.2%[95% CI: 93.9% - 96.3%] | GAS* Sensitivity: 96.5%[95% CI: 91.3% - 98.6%] GAS* Specificity: 98.0%[95% CI: 97.0% - 98.6%] Pyo GCS/GGS* Sensitivity: 95.7%[95% CI: 88.1% - 98.5%] Pyo GCS/GGS* Specificity: 98.3%[95% CI: 97.4% - 98.9%] |
*GAS = Group A Streptococcus; Pyo GCS/GGS = Pyogenic Group C/G Streptococcus
{4}
5
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Not applicable.
L. Test Principle:
The Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay system is a real-time PCR system that enables the direct amplification and qualitative detection of Group A Strep bacterial DNA from throat swabs that have not undergone a nucleic acid extraction. The system consists of the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay, the 3M Integrated Cycler (with Integrated Cycler Studio Software), the Direct Amplification Disc (DAD) and associated accessories. In the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay, bi-functional fluorescent probe-primers are used together with corresponding reverse primers to amplify Group A Strep bacterial DNA and the Internal Control (DNA IC). The assay targets a conserved region of Group A Strep (pyrogenic exotoxin B gene) to identify this bacteria in the specimen. The DNA IC is used to detect PCR failure and/or inhibition.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision Study
Within-laboratory, inter-lot precision was evaluated for the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay at one (1) site using two (2) strains of Group A Streptococci (GAS) representative of serotypes M1 and M3 with four (4) panel members:
1) Negative
2) Low Positive (LP), 1 x LoD and
3) Moderate Positive (MP), 3.0 x LoD.
4) Positive Control (PC)
Contrived specimens were spiked from freshly-grown bacterial stocks into a simulated negative matrix with target GAS at the final intended target concentration (confirmed by titration and plate count). Cell preparations were frozen at -70°C after preparation until testing. The LoD values were based on the values obtained in the LoD study. See section M.2.b below for details on the matrix equivalency and freeze-thaw study.
The study was conducted with three (3) different Reaction Mix lots. Each panel member was run in duplicate (2), twice (2) per day for three (3) non-consecutive days by one (1) operator at one (1) site (2 replicates x twice per day x 3 days x 3 lots = 36 replicates/panel member/strain). The results are shown in Table I.
{5}
6
| Table I: Inter Lot Precision Study | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Strain | Panel | # Detected/# Tested | % Detected | 95% CI | CFU/ml |
| No Analyte | Negative | 0/36 | 0.0% | (0.0%, 10.6%) | 0 |
| GAS M1 | LP | 36/36 | 100.0% | (90.4%, 100.0%) | 6.8 x 10² |
| | MP | 36/36 | 100.0% | (90.4%, 100.0%) | 2.4 x 10³ |
| GAS M3 | LP | 36/36 | 100.0% | (90.4%, 100.0%) | 2.0 x 10³ |
| | MP | 36/36 | 100.0% | (90.4%, 100.0%) | 7.1 x 10³ |
| Positive Control | PC | 36/36 | 100.0% | (90.4%, 100.0%) | N/A |
The precision study results met the pre-defined acceptance criteria for LP, MP, and PC specimens. The results of this study are acceptable and these results are described in labeling.
## Reproducibility Study
The reproducibility of the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay was established in a multi-center study. The same strains and panel members were prepared and tested as listed in the precision study above (Table I). Panel members were tested in triplicate (3) in two (2) runs per day each by a different operator at three (3) sites for five (5) non-consecutive days (3 replicates x 2 operators runs x 3 sites x 5 days = 90 replicates/panel member). These studies were conducted with a single (1) lot of positive control and reagents across the three (3) sites. The results are shown in Table II.
| Table II: Reproducibility Study | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Strain | Panel | # Detected/# Tested | % Detected | 95% CI | CFU/ml |
| No Analyte | Negative | 1/90* | 1.1% | (0.2%, 6.0%) | 0 |
| GAS M1 | LP | 84/90 | 93.3% | (86.2%, 96.9%) | 6.8 x 10² |
| | MP | 88/90* | 97.8% | (92.3%, 99.4%) | 2.4 x 10³ |
| GAS M3 | LP | 85/90 | 94.4% | (87.6%, 97.6%) | 2.0 x 10³ |
| | MP | 87/90* | 96.7% | (90.7%, 98.9%) | 7.1 x 10³ |
| Positive Control | PC | 90/90 | 100.0% | (95.9%, 100.0%) | N/A |
* All observed unexpected results came from runs performed by the same operator at the same site during the first two days of the study.
These results met the predefined acceptance criteria for the various panels and are described in labeling.
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable.
{6}
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct and Simplexa™ Group A Strep Positive Control Pack have been determined to be stable for at least 14 months of real-time stability over a temperature range from -14 °C to -28 °C. The products are labeled with a 12 month expiration date.
To assess the room-temperature stability of positive control aliquots of positive control were thawed and kept at room temperature for 8 hours and 24 hours and tested to determine room temperature stability. The positive control is stable up to 24 hours when stored at room temperature.
To assess the room-temperature stability of Simplexa™ Group A Strep Reaction Mix, the Reaction Mix was thawed from -20°C and kept at room temperature for 30 and 60 minutes. Positive Control (PC) was tested in quadruplicate (4) with singlet (1) of unspiked Aimes medium as a negative sample. The Reaction Mix stability was established and the labeling instructs the end user to use within 30 minutes from thawing.
Clinical studies demonstrate that swab specimens are stable for over 24 h.
d. Detection limit:
The limit of detection (LoD) of the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay was determined using contrived stocks of two (2) GAS serotypes which were prepared per the protocol described in the precision study section (see M.1.a above). The LoD study was conducted using two (2) lots on four (4) instruments. The LoD was defined as the point at which at least 95% of all replicates tested positive (C95). Eight (8) dilutions from each serotype were screened in triplicate (3). The lowest dilution at which all three (3) replicates were detected was confirmed using twenty (20) additional replicates for each serotype at that concentration. Two invalid replicates were observed due to internal control failure. The LoD study results are shown in Table III below.
| Table III: LoD for Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Strain | Serotype | CFU/ml |
| Group A Streptococcal strain 1 (Streptococcus pyogenes) | M1 | 6.82 x 10^{2} |
| Group A Streptococcal strain 2 (Streptococcus pyogenes) | M3 | 2.35 x 10^{3} |
These LoD values are described in the labeling and they were used in determining spiking levels for all subsequent analytical studies.
e. Analytical reactivity:
Inclusivity studies were conducted for the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay
{7}
with twenty-one (21) GAS strains, in addition to those tested in the LoD studies, in replicates of three (3) per strain near at $2 - 3 \times$ LoD $(1.50 \times 10^{3})$ using the LoD determined for the M1 serotype (LoD = 682 CFU/ml) as the basis. If detection failure was experienced, the concentration of the particular strain was increased until all three (3) replicates were positively detected.
This study was performed with one (1) reagent lot on two (2) different instruments, performed by two (2) operators. Each cultured strain was prepared per the protocol described above in M.1.a above. The inclusivity study results and the final organism concentrations tested are shown in Table IV below. All GAS strains were correctly detected by the assay at the concentrations indicated.
| Table IV: Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus Inclusivity | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Group A Streptococcus Strain # | Serotype | CFU/ml |
| 1 | M2 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 2 | M4 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 3 | M5 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 4 | M6 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 5 | M9 | 3.00 x 103 |
| 6 | M12 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 7 | M13 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 8 | M14 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 9 | M18 | 5.00 x 103 |
| 10 | M22 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 11 | M27 | 3.00 x 103 |
| 12 | M28 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 13 | M29 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 14 | M49 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 15 | M73 | 3.00 x 103 |
| 16 | M75 | 3.00 x 103 |
| 17 | M77 | 3.00 x 103 |
| 18 | M78 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 19 | M82 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 20 | M87 | 1.50 x 103 |
| 21 | M89 | 3.00 x 103 |
These study results are acceptable and they are described in the labeling.
f. Analytical specificity:
{8}
# i. Microbial cross-reactivity
An in silico BLAST analysis of primers used in the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay against the NCBI database did not show evidence of cross-reactivity with organisms that might be found in throat swab specimens.
A study was performed to evaluate the performance of the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay in the presence of sixty-four (64) potentially cross-reacting bacteria and viruses commonly found in throat specimens (see Table V below). Each organism was tested in triplicate in the presence of clinically relevant levels of viruses $(10^{5}\mathrm{PFU / ml})$ and bacteria $(10^{6}\mathrm{CFU / ml})$ or higher. All strains were spiked into simulated negative matrix and evaluated using one (1) lot and two (2) instruments by two (2) operators.
| Table V: Strains Included in Cross-Reactivity | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Strain | | |
| Arcanobacterium haemolyticum | Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), ATCC 43300 | Streptococcus sobrinus |
| Bacillus cereus | Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), ATCC 29887 | Streptococcus uberis |
| Bacteroides ovatus | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | Streptococcus vestibularis |
| Bordetella pertussis | Streptococcus agalactiae | Treponema denticola |
| Burkholderia cepacia | Streptococcus anginosus | Veillonella parvula |
| Campylobacter rectus | Streptococcus canis | Adenovirus 1 |
| Candida albicans | Streptococcus constellatus subsp. constellatus | Adenovirus 7A |
| Chlamydia pneumoniae | Streptococcus cristatus | Coronavirus 229E |
| Corynebacterium diphtheriae | Streptococcus dysgalactiae | Cytomegalovirus (CMV) |
| Enterococcus faecalis vanB | Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus | Enterovirus 71 |
| Escherichia coli | Streptococcus equinus | Epstein-Barr virus (B95-8) |
| Fusobacterium necrophorum | Streptococcus gallolyticus | HSV-1 McIntyre |
| Haemophilus influenzae | Streptococcus gordonii | HSV-2 G |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | Streptococcus intermedius | Influenza A/Hong Kong/8/68 H3N2 |
| Lactobacillus acidophilus | Streptococcus mitis | Influenza B/Panama/45/90 |
| Legionella pneumophila | Streptococcus mutans | Metapneumovirus-9 |
| Moraxella catarrhalis | Streptococcus oralis | Parainfluenza 1 |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeae | Streptococcus parasanguinis | Parainfluenza 2 |
{9}
| Neisseria meningitidis | Streptococcus pneumoniae | Parainfluenza 3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Peptostreptococcus micros | Streptococcus salivarius | Rhinovirus 1A |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Streptococcus sanguinis | RSV-B 9320 |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae | | |
None of the sixty-four (64) bacteria and viruses tested that might be found in throat swab specimens cross-react with the assay.
These study results are acceptable and these results are described in labeling.
ii. Microbial interference
Interference studies were conducted with each of the sixty-four (64) microorganisms listed above in Table V. Each organism was tested in triplicate in the presence of clinically relevant levels of viruses (10⁵ PFU/ml) and bacteria (10⁶ CFU/ml) or higher. All strains were spiked into simulated negative matrix along with 2-4 x LoD Group A Streptococcus serotypes M1 and M3 and evaluated using one (1) lot and two (2) instruments by two (2) operators. None of the organisms interfered with the detection of the Group A Streptococcal strains.
iii. Interfering substances
Twenty-nine (29) chemical and biological substances likely to be found in throat swab specimens were evaluated for potential to interfere with the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay, including blood (10% v/v), mucin (60μg/ml) and saliva (50μl/swab). Each substance was tested in triplicate using two serotypes of Streptococcus pyogenes (M1 and M3), tested near 3 x LoD at medically relevant concentrations. None of the substances tested were found to interfere with the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay.
iv. Carryover/Cross-contamination
A study to assess carryover contamination was conducted with another previously cleared kit (k120413) and the results were determined to be acceptable. Due to the similarities of risks posed by the previous device and the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct device, no carryover studies were conducted for this assay.
g. Assay cut-off:
A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the cycle threshold (Ct) cutoff for the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay. Using ROC analysis and the Ct spread from the LoD as well as the clinical study, the Ct cutoff was set at 45. This value was used to determine assay results in the analytical and clinical studies.
2. Comparison studies:
{10}
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not applicable.
# b. Matrix comparison:
A comparison study was conducted between negative clinical matrix and a contrived negative matrix in order to validate the use of the contrived negative matrix in place of a clinical negative matrix for the analytic studies in section M1 above. Contrived negative matrix was comprised of Amies medium with $9\%$ w/v mucin and $1\%$ v/v whole blood, constructed to mimic challenging clinical specimens. The matrix comparison study results are shown in Table VI below.
| Table VI: Matrix Comparison Study | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel ID | Simulated Negative Matrix | | Swab Negative Clinical Matrix | | |
| | | Detected | % Pos | Detected | % Pos |
| Group A Streptococcus Serotype M1 | 10 x LoD | 3/3 | 100% | 3/3 | 100% |
| | 2 x LoD | 7/7 | 100% | 7/7 | 100% |
| | 1 x LoD | 20/20 | 100% | 20/20 | 100% |
| Group A Streptococcus Serotype M3 | 10 x LoD | 3/3 | 100% | 3/3 | 100% |
| | 2 x LoD | 7/7 | 100% | 7/7 | 100% |
| | 1 x LoD | 20/20 | 100% | 20/20 | 100% |
These studies demonstrate that the contrived negative matrix is produces results that are equivalent to those obtained with a clinical matrix. These study results are acceptable.
# 3. Clinical studies:
Performance characteristics of the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct assay were established during a prospective study using fresh left-over throat swabs collected from and tested at four (4) clinical sites across the United States between May 6, 2014 and October 28, 2014. The assay was evaluated for the qualitative detection and differentiation of Group A $\beta$ -hemolytic Streptococcus nucleic acids in comparison to culture. Discrepant analysis was conducted using bi-directional sequencing.
One thousand three hundred and ninety-seven (1397) specimens collected during clinical trials, of which one thousand three hundred and ninety-six (1396) were tested with the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct. Of these, one thousand three hundred and ninety-two (1392) specimens provided valid results from the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct and one thousand three hundred and fifty-seven (1357) were evaluable by culture. Of these, one thousand three hundred and fifty-two (1352) specimens were evaluable by both the test and reference method and could be used to evaluate the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct. The invalid rate observed during the clinical prospective study for this device was
{11}
0.57% (8/1396). These results are shown in Table VII below for all sites combined and for each study site separately.
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
| Table VII: Clinical Performance Data for the Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct vs. Composite Cultures for Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| All Sites | | | |
| Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct | Composite Culture | | |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 152 | 57* | 209 |
| Negative | 4** | 1139 | 1143 |
| Total | 156 | 1196 | 1352 |
| Sensitivity: 97.4% (152/156) 95% CI (93.6% - 99.0%)
Specificity: 95.2% (1139/1196) 95% CI (93.9% - 96.3%) | | | |
| * Of the 57 discordant specimens, 46 were positive for GAS when tested with bi-directional sequencing, 9 were negative and 2 were indeterminate.
** Of the 4 discordant specimens, 2 were GAS negative when tested with bi-directional sequencing. | | | |
| Site 1 | | | |
| Simplexa™ Group A Strep Direct | Composite Culture | | |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 28 | 10* | 38 |
| Negative | 1** | 144 | 145 |
| Total | 29 | 154 | 183 |
| Sensitivity: 96.6% (28/29) 95% CI (82.8% - 99.4%)
Specificity: 93.5% (144/154) 95% CI (88.5% - 96.4%) | | | |
| * Of the 10 discordant specimens, 7 were positive for GAS when tested with bi-directional sequencing, 3 were negative.
** The 1 discordant specimen was GAS positive when tested with bi-directional sequencing. | | | |
{12}
| Site 2 | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Simplexa™Group AStrep Direct | Composite Culture | | |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 47 | 14* | 61 |
| Negative | 1** | 435 | 436 |
| Total | 48 | 449 | 497 |
| Sensitivity: 97.9% (47/48) 95% CI (89.1% - 99.6%)Specificity: 96.9% (435/449) 95% CI (94.8%- 98.1%) | | | |
| * Of the 14 discordant specimens, 11 were positive for GAS when tested with bi-directional sequencing, 2 were negative and 1 was indeterminate.** The 1 discordant specimen was GAS negative when tested with bi-directional sequencing. | | | |
| Site 3 | | | |
| Simplexa™Group AStrep Direct | Composite Culture | | |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 44 | 23* | 67 |
| Negative | 0 | 215 | 215 |
| Total | 44 | 238 | 282 |
| Sensitivity: 100.0% (44/44) 95% CI (92.0% to 100.0%)Specificity: 90.3% (215/238) 95% CI (85.9% - 93.5%) | | | |
| * Of the 23 discordant specimens, 19 were positive for GAS when tested with bi-directional sequencing, 3 were negative and 1 was indeterminate. | | | |
{13}
| Site 4 | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Simplexa™Group AStrep Direct | Composite Culture | | |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 33 | 10* | 43 |
| Negative | 2** | 345 | 347 |
| Total | 35 | 355 | 390 |
| Sensitivity: 94.3% (33/35) 95% CI (81.4% - 98.4%)Specificity: 97.2% (345/355) 95% CI (94.9% - 98.5%) | | | |
| * Of the 10 discordant specimens, 9 were positive for GAS when tested with bi-directional sequencing.** Of the 2 discordant specimens, 1 was GAS negative when tested with bi-directional sequencing. | | | |
The positive control for this assay is an inactivated GAS strain. The negative control is a no-template control. The positive and negative external quality control isolates provided were tested at least once per day during the clinical studies for each instrument used in the study for that day. One positive control lot was used throughout the clinical trials. All valid Group A Streptococcus positive controls were detected accurately (100%, 203/203). All valid no-template controls were detected accurately (100%, 204/204). During these studies, there were four (4) invalid negative controls and five (5) invalid positive controls. In each instance, the controls were repeated successfully during the same day on the same instrument.
b. Clinical specificity:
See table above.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The overall incidence of Group A $\beta$ -hemolytic Streptococcus in patients tested during this study was $11.2\%$ (152/1352) based on culture results. All clinical specimens collected during this study were collected between May 6, 2014 and October 28, 2014.
{14}
15
N. Instrument Name:
3M Integrated Cycler
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
Yes _______ or No ☐ X
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
Yes _______ or No ☐ X
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No _______
3. Specimen Identification:
Specimens are identified by scanning or typing in the sample identifier.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Swab specimens are expressed in transport medium. 50μl of the expressed specimen are transferred to the Sample Well of the Direct Amplification Disk and the disk is loaded into the Integrated Cycler for automated extraction, amplification and detection. See section I above for more information.
5. Calibration:
End-user calibration for the Integrated Cycler is not necessary. Calibration of the optical modules (excitation and emission gain settings) is performed during the manufacturing process and the values are stored in the instrument firmware.
6. Quality Control:
See section M.1.c for information on internal and external controls.
See section M.3.a for information on external control performance during clinical trials.
{15}
P. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
Q. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
16
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.