K142793 · AbbVie , Inc. · KNT · Jan 14, 2015 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K142793
Device Name
AbbVie PEG
Applicant
AbbVie , Inc.
Product Code
KNT · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Jan 14, 2015
Decision
SESK
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5980
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The AbbVie PEG is intended to provide long-term enteral access for administration of medication to the small intestine when used in conjunction with the AbbVie J, intestinal tube. As needed, enteral nutrition may be administered directly to the stomach in parallel with medication delivery to the intestine. The AbbVie PEG is indicated for the administration of the medication DUOPA (carbidopa and levodopa enteral suspension).
Device Story
AbbVie PEG is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube kit used to provide long-term enteral access. The device acts as a conduit for the AbbVie J intestinal tube, which delivers medication (DUOPA) to the small intestine; it also allows for simultaneous enteral nutrition delivery to the stomach. Used in home or healthcare facility environments. The kit includes a polyurethane PEG tube, silicone external fixation plate, tube clamp, thread, introducer, cannula, and scalpel. The device is inserted through an abdominal wall incision into the stomach. It functions as a mechanical access port; no electronic or algorithmic components are involved. Benefits include facilitating chronic medication delivery for patients requiring enteral access.
Clinical Evidence
No animal or clinical evaluations were performed or relied upon. Biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity, subchronic toxicity, pyrogenicity, genotoxicity, implantation) and performance testing (EN 1615:2000, ISO 80369-1:2010, 21 CFR 177.2600) were conducted.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Polyurethane (tube), silicone (fixation plate). Dimensions: 15 FR or 20 FR, 35 cm length. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide. Standards: EN 1615:2000 (enteral feeding catheters), ISO 80369-1:2010 (small-bore connectors), 21 CFR 177.2600 (food contact). Mechanical device; no energy source or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring long-term enteral access for medication administration (specifically DUOPA) to the small intestine and/or enteral nutrition to the stomach, via the AbbVie J intestinal tube.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A gastrointestinal tube and accessories is a device that consists of flexible or semi-rigid tubing used for instilling fluids into, withdrawing fluids from, splinting, or suppressing bleeding of the alimentary tract. This device may incorporate an integral inflatable balloon for retention or hemostasis. This generic type of device includes the hemostatic bag, irrigation and aspiration catheter (gastric, colonic, etc.), rectal catheter, sterile infant gavage set, gastrointestinal string and tubes to locate internal bleeding, double lumen tube for intestinal decompression or intubation, feeding tube, gastroenterostomy tube, Levine tube, nasogastric tube, single lumen tube with mercury weight balloon for intestinal intubation or decompression, and gastro-urological irrigation tray (for gastrological use).
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The barium enema retention catheter and tip with or without a bag that is a gastrointestinal tube and accessory or a gastronomy tube holder accessory is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.(2) Class I (general controls) for the dissolvable nasogastric feed tube guide for the nasogastric tube. The class I device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 876.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The seal features an abstract design of three human profiles facing right, stacked on top of each other. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the design.
Re:
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
January 14, 2015
AbbVie Inc. Katherine Wortley Director Regulatory Affairs 1 N. Waukegan Road North Chicago, IL 60064
> K142793 Trade/Device Name: AbbVie PEG Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5980 Regulation Name: Gastrointestinal Tube and Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KNT Dated: January 9, 2015 Received: January 12, 2015
Dear Katherine Wortley,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. However, you are responsible to determine that the medical devices you use as components in the kit have either been determined as substantially equivalent under the premarket notification process (Section 510(k) of the act), or were legally on the market prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments. Please note: If you purchase your device components in bulk (i.e., unfinished) and further process (e.g., sterilize) you must submit a new 510(k) before including these components in your kit. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Benjamin R. Fisher -A
Benjamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K142793
Device Name: AbbVie PEG
Indications for Use:
The AbbVie PEG is intended to provide long-term enteral access for administration of medication to the small intestine when used in conjunction with the AbbVie J, intestinal tube. As needed, enteral nutrition may be administered directly to the stomach in parallel with medication delivery to the intestine. The AbbVie PEG is indicated for the administration of the medication DUOPA (carbidopa and levodopa enteral suspension).
Prescription Use _X __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Over-The-Counter Use _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ AND/OR (21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH. Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
## SUBMITTER
AbbVie Inc. 1 N. Waukegan Road North Chicago, IL 60064
Phone: (847) 938-7707 Fax: (847) 775-4997
Contact Person: Katherine Wortley, Ph.D., Director Regulatory Affairs Email: Katherine.wortley@abbvie.com
Date Prepared: September 25, 2014
#### DEVICE
| Name of Device: | AbbVie PEG |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual<br>Name: | Gastrostomy Tube |
| Classification Name: | Tubes, Gastrointestinal and Accessories<br>(21 CFR 876.5980) |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
| Product Code: | KNT |
## PREDICATE DEVICE
AbbVie PEG, K133087 No reference devices were used in this submission.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The AbbVie PEG is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG or gastric) tube, either 15 FR (List Number 62910) or 20 FR (List Number 62912) and 35 cm in length.
The product components include the following:
- AbbVie PEG Tube (polyurethane) .
- External Fixation Plate (silicone, radio-opaque) with integrated Tube Clip and ●
- Tube Clamp. ●
Additionally, the kit includes the following components:
- Reel of thread .
- Introducer device ●
- Puncture cannula with safety (air) valve and ●
- Disposable scalpel. ●
The kit is supplied sterile (ethylene oxide).
The AbbVie PEG is intended to allow the introduction of the AbbVie J intestinal tube for administration of medication in a home and/or healthcare facility environment. The AbbVie PEG is inserted through an incision in the abdominal wall over the stomach. The AbbVie J intestinal tube is placed through the PEG in order to deliver medication to the small intestine.
## INDICATIONS FOR USE
The AbbVie PEG is intended to provide long-term enteral access for administration of medication to the small intestine when used in conjunction with the AbbVie J, intestinal tube. As needed, enteral nutrition may be administered directly to the stomach in parallel with medication delivery to the intestine. The AbbVie PEG is indicated for the administration of the medication DUOPA (carbidopa and levodopa enteral suspension).
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### COMPARISON OF TECHNILOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The proposed device is identical to the predicate device (AbbVie PEG, K133087) with the exception of the proposed indication for use with DUOPA.
#### PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
#### Biocompatibility Testing
The biocompatibility evaluation for the AbbVie PEG was conducted in accordance with the FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1 Use of International Standard ISO-10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing,' published May 1, 1995, FDA Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: Use of International Standard ISO-10993, "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing" published April 23, 2013 and International Standard ISO 10993-1 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process, as recognized by FDA. A gastrostomy tube is considered an external communicating device through tissue contact, with contact duration greater than 30 days. The battery of testing included the following:
- Cytotoxicity
- . Sensitization
- Irritation (intracutaneous reactivity) ●
- Systemic toxicity (acute) ●
- Subchronic Toxicity (subacute toxicity) ●
- Pyrogen Testing ●
- Genotoxicity and ●
- Implantation. ●
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Product Specific Performance Testing
The AbbVie PEG was assessed for conformance to standard EN 1615:2000 Enteral feeding catheters and enteral giving sets for single use and their connectors – Design and testing. An assessment of the AbbVie PEG has been completed and shown to be acceptable per ISO 80369-1:2010 Small-bore Connectors for Liquids and Gases in Healthcare Applications- Part 1: General requirements. Food contact testing was conducted on the AbbVie PEG and demonstrated that the materials that constitute the AbbVie PEG are acceptable for food contact use. The study was conducted as described in 21 CFR 177.2600 Indirect Food Additives: Polymers, Rubber articles intended for repeated use per the extractable limits.
## Animal and Clinical Studies
No animal or clinical evaluations were performed or relied upon for the determination of substantial equivalence.
## CONCLUSIONS
The AbbVie PEG is an acceptable conduit for the AbbVie J and for delivery of nutritional materials to the stomach. The proposed device, AbbVie PEG, is substantially equivalent to the predicate device as it is identical to the previously cleared predicate device (AbbVie PEG, K133087). The indication for use with DUOPA does not alter the intended use (enteral delivery of fluids) or introduce a difference that impacts safety or effectiveness of the device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.