K142525 · Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH · HIN · Nov 21, 2014 · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Device Facts
Record ID
K142525
Device Name
PK Lap Loop
Applicant
Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH
Product Code
HIN · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Decision Date
Nov 21, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 884.4150
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Bipolar Laparoscopic Loop is a 5mm bipolar electrosurgical device. The device is intended to be used for the amputation of the mobilised uterus during Laparoscopic Supracervical (Subtotal) Hysterectomy and the resection of devascularized subserosal pedunculated myomas. It is used in conjunction with the Olympus Electrosurgical Generator ESG-400.
Device Story
Single-use, 5mm bipolar electrosurgical loop; used for uterine amputation during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and resection of pedunculated myomas. Device connects to Olympus Electrosurgical Generator ESG-400; utilizes bipolar RF energy to coagulate and cut tissue. Operated by surgeons in laparoscopic clinical settings. Features integrated device recognition via a multifunctional connector to ensure compatibility with the ESG-400 generator and prevent connection to incompatible systems. Provides identical output waveforms and power levels as predicate device. Benefits include efficient tissue resection and coagulation during minimally invasive gynecological procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data presented. Verification and validation included mechanical testing, tissue effect testing, electrical safety (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-2), and biocompatibility (ISO 10993) to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
Technological Characteristics
5mm bipolar electrosurgical loop; 0.4mm single wire diameter; 88mm x 227mm loop size. Materials compliant with ISO 10993. Energy source: Olympus ESG-400 generator. Connectivity: Proprietary multifunctional connector with device recognition/poka-yoke feature. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide (EtO). Standards: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-2, ISO 11607, ISO 11737.
Indications for Use
Indicated for laparoscopic patients undergoing laparoscopic supracervical (subtotal) hysterectomy for uterine amputation or resection of devascularized subserosal pedunculated myomas.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bipolar endoscopic coagulator-cutter is a device used to perform female sterilization and other operative procedures under endoscopic observation. It destroys tissue with high temperatures by directing a high frequency electrical current through tissue between two electrical contacts of a probe. This generic type of device may include the following accessories: an electrical generator, probes, and electrical cables.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance 2/12/90 (K-90),” and
(iii) “Guidance (‘Guidelines’) for Evaluation of Laproscopic Bipolar and Thermal Coagulators (and Accessories),”
(2) International Electrotechnical Commission's IEC 60601-1-AM2 (1995-03), Amendment 2, “Medical Electrical Equipment—Part 1: General Requirements for Safety,”
(3) American National Standards Institute/American Association for Medical Instrumentation's HF-18, 1993, “Electrosurgical Devices,”
(4) Labeling:
(i) Indication: For female tubal sterilization, and
(ii) Instructions for use:
(A) Destroy at least 2 centimeters of the fallopian tubes,
(B) Use a cut or undampened sinusoidal waveform,
(C) Use a minimum power of 25 watts, and
(D) For devices with ammeters: continue electrode activation for 5 seconds after the visual endpoint (tissue blanching) is reached or current flow ceases indicating adequate tissue destruction.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular and contains the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract design featuring three stylized human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines beneath them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 21, 2014
Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH % Graham Baillie Regulatory Affairs Olympus Surgical Tech. America 136 Turnpike Road Southborough, MA 01772
Re: K142525
> Trade/Device Name: PK Lap Loop Regulation Number: 21 CFR 884.4150 Regulation Name: Bipolar Endoscopic Coagulator-Cutter and Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HIN Dated: September 5, 2014 Received: September 10, 2014
Dear Graham Baillie,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device
{1}------------------------------------------------
related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Benjamin R. Fisher -A
Benjamin Fisher Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name PK Lap Loop
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Bipolar Laparoscopic Loop is a 5mm bipolar electrosurgical device. The device is intended to be used for the amputation of the mobilised uterus during Laparoscopic Supracervical (Subtotal) Hysterectomy and the resection of devascularized subserosal pedunculated myomas. It is used in conjunction with the Olympus Electrosurgical Generator ESG-400.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
#### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Traditional 510(k) Notification August 29th, 2014
PK Lap Loop
510(k) Premarket Notification
510(k) Summary
Olympus Winter & Ibe
{4}------------------------------------------------
Bipolar Laparoscopic Loop PK Lap Loop Olympus Winter & Ibe
Traditional 510(k) Notification August 29th, 2014
# 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
## General information
| Applicant: | Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH<br>Kuehnstrasse 61<br>22045 Hamburg<br>Germany |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Establishment Registration No.: | 9610773 |
| Manufacturer: | Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH<br>Kuehnstrasse 61<br>22045 Hamburg<br>Germany |
| 510(k) Submitter: | Gyrus ACMI, Inc.<br>Olympus surgical Technologies America (OSTA)<br>136 Turnpike Road<br>Southborough, MA 01772<br>Phone (508) 804-2738<br>Fax (508) 804-2624<br>Establishment Registration No. 3003790304 |
| Official Correspondent: | Graham Baillie<br>Regulatory Affairs Manager<br>Phone: 508.804.2738<br>Fax: 508.804.2624<br>Email: Graham.baillie@olympus-osta.com |
| Contact person: | Mr. Holger Nadler<br>Phone: +49-66966-2860<br>Fax:<br>+49-66966-2134<br>Email: holger.nadler@olympus-oste.eu |
| Date Prepared: | August 29th, 2014 |
| Trade Name: | Pk Lap Loop |
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Device identification
| Proprietary name: | PK Lap Loop |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Device Classification name: | Coagulator-Cutter, Endoscopic, Bipolar (And Accessories) |
| Regulation Medical Specialty: | Obstetrics/Gynecology |
| Regulations Number: | 21 CFR 884.4150 |
| Regulatory class: | Class II |
| Product code: | HIN |
#### Predicate device
K122605: PKS BILL
#### Description of device
The Bipolar Laparoscopic Loop is a single use disposable high frequency RF bipolar accessory to be used in conjunction with the Olympus Electrosurgical Generator ESG-400. It is available in an 88mm x 227mm loop size. The device is sterilized by ethylene.
#### Intended use
The bipolar Laparoscopic Loop is a 5mm bipolar electrosurgical device. The device is intended to be used for the amputation of the mobilised uterus during Laparoscopic Supracervical (Subtotal) Hysterectomy and the resection of devascularized subserosal pedunculated myomas. It is used in conjunction with the Olympus Electrosurgical Generator ESG-400.
#### Comparison of the technology between the PK Lap Loop and PKS BiLL
The technical characteristics are listed below
| Compatibility | | |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
| Electrosurgical<br>Generator | For PK Lap Loop the RF is delivered through the Olympus<br>ESG 400 generator and the PKS BILL energy is delivered<br>through the Gyrus G400 | different |
| Energy used and<br>delivered | Identical output waveforms and power levels are used in<br>both devices. | identical |
| Compatibility with<br>other<br>devices | Same as PKS Bill. Device not to be activated at the same<br>time as other electrosurgical devices. | identical |
| Design | | |
| Design | The design of the PK Lap Loop device is fundamentally<br>the same as PKS BILL. There are minor changes that have<br>no impact upon safety, usability and performance. | similar |
| Performance | The performance of the PK Lap Loop device in use with<br>the ESG400 generator is the same as PKS BILL in use with<br>the Gyrus G400 generator. This considers tissue effect,<br>speeds and forces required to complete the amputation. | identical |
| Device Minimum and<br>Maximum output<br>powers | Average power of one cycle period is 200W. | identical |
| Cutting time | <15 seconds max. | identical |
| Electrode dimensions | 88mm x 227mm | identical |
| Loop wire diameter | 0.4mm single wire | identical |
| To fit tocar | 5mm | identical |
| Safety | | |
| Electrical safety | Both devices are compliant with IEC 60601, IEC 60601-1,<br>IEC and 60601-2-2 | identical |
| Electrical Safety | Meets IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-2 | identical |
| Thermal safety | Both devices are compliant with the relevant clauses of<br>IEC 60601. | identical |
| Biocompatibility | All materials for PK Lap Loop are the same as used in the<br>construction of PKS BILL with the exception of the<br>insulation on the main shaft. Note: whilst it is described<br>as insulation, the function is purely cosmetic and<br>therefore it has been omitted from the PK Lap Loop<br>design.<br>The majority of the patient contact materials have been<br>used on other devices.<br>The coated wires and nylon insulators successfully<br>completed an additional cytotoxicity test following EtO<br>sterilization to ensure that materials are compliant to<br>ISO10993. | similar |
| Mechanical safety | Both devices are designed to withstand the same clinical<br>loads. The clinical inputs apply to both devices as they<br>have the same function and intended use. | identical |
| Sterility/Methodology | The PKS Bill is gamma irradiated, the PK Lap Loop is ETO<br>sterilized | different |
| Sterility/Assurance<br>level | PK Lap Loop and PKS Bill have both a sterility assurance<br>level of 10-6 | identical |
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Performance Data
Performance data were created to demonstrate substantial equivalence with the predicate device PKS Bill.
The verification and validation activities involved mechanical and tissue tests as well as electrical safety, biocompatibility and sterilization testing according to FDA recognized standards.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Interface tests to demonstrate compatibility to the Electro Surgical Generator ESG-400 were performed during this submission.
The technical justification report comprises the device requirements not needing additional tests to demonstrate substantial equivalence and can be adopted from predicate device.
The Lap Loop is compliant to electrical standards specifically to those applicable sections of IEC 60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and 60601-2-2:2009 Edition 5.0 incorporating electrical, thermal safety and Electromagnetic Interference.
Biocompatibility testing was completed on the predicate PKS BiLL and therefore is used to leverage the PK Lap Loop device given the commonality of patient contact parts. As an additional measure, Cytotoxicity tests on all patient contacting parts have been performed in compliance to the relevant requirements of ISO 10993:2009.
It is packaged and sterilized as a sterile single use device tested according to FDA recognized consensus standards ISO 11607 (11607-1:2006/(R)2010 and 11607-2:2006 First edition) and 11737 (11737-1:2006 Second Edition and 11737-2:2009 Second Edition).
## Technological features and Substantial Equivalence
The PK Lap Loop Instrument is substantially equivalent to the predicate which is currently marketed as PKS BiLL cleared under K122605. The principles of function, operation, fundamental scientific technology, and physical dimensions of the PKS Lap Loop Instrument are identical to the predicate PKS Bill device.
The PK Lap Loop is a copy of its predicates PKS Bill (K122605) in construction and mechanical design. Compared with its predicates the PK Lap Loop is operated by the Olympus Electrosurgical Generator ESG-400 (K141225). The predicate PKS Bill is driven by the Gyrus Electrosurgical Generator G400, (K081954). Both Generators provide identical waveforms and power levels as demonstrated during the 510(k) submission K141225.
As well as the Gyrus Generator G400 the ESG-400 uses a universal socket with a self-recognition system. The socket detects the specific PK-Instument to provide only the proper allowable range of waveform output and power level.
The design of the PK Lap Loop device is fundamentally the same as PKS BiLL. There are minor changes as a result of corporate branding from Gyrus ACMI to Olympus. These minor changes have no impact upon safety, usability and performance.
The PK Lap Loop has the same intended use as the FDA cleared PKS Bill. It is intended to be used for the amputation of the mobilised uterus during Laparoscopic Supracervical (Subtotal) Hysterectomy and the resection of devascularized subserosal pedunculated myomas when used with the Olympus Electrosurgical Generator.
Also the intended population of patients remains the same (Laparoscopic Patients).
There is a change of Indications of Use. The PK-instrument is renamed from PKS-Bill to PK Lap Loop and the PK Lap Loop is used in conjunction with the Olympus Electro Surgical Generator ESG-400 (cleared under K141225).
The facts summarized:
- . The Lap Loop and predicate PKS BiLL (K122605) are identical products when considering the Bipolar PK (Plasma Kinetic) technology and mechanical design features.
- The PK Lap Loop is compatible to the Olympus Generator ESG-400 (K141225).
{8}------------------------------------------------
- . The Olympus Generator ESG-400 (K14225) provides identical output waveforms and power levels as the FDA cleared Gyrus G400 electrosurgical generator, K081954.
- Just like the predicates PKS Bill (K122605 and K111059) the Lap Loop contains device recognition. It ensures that the PK Lap Loop can only be connected to the Olympus Generator ESG-400 (K141225). The plug is very different and poke yoked to preclude a connection to another generator. The Olympus specific Multifunctional Connector delivers the correct range of waveforms and power levels at the output socket.
The Lap Loop uses materials that are well established and used in other Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH and GYRUS ACMI FDA cleared medical devices. This also involves the blue ring which is integrated in the shaft and the new cable for use with the ESG400 generator for Corporate Design reasons. Refering the biocompatibility the materials for PK Lap Loop are all the same as used in the construction of PKS BiLL.
The PK Lap Loop device will be manufactured at the same facility as the predicate device using common procedures.
## Summary
The bipolar Laparoscopic Lap Loop, as described in this submission, is substantially equivalent to the predicate in intended use, materials, principles of operation and fundamental scientific technology and raises no new issues of safety and effectiveness.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.