K142469 · Children'S Mercy Hospital · PIR · May 1, 2015 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K142469
Device Name
2D Mercy TAPE & 3D Mercy TAPE
Applicant
Children'S Mercy Hospital
Product Code
PIR · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
May 1, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4800
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
AI/ML, Real-World Evidence, Pediatric
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K142469 · May 1, 2015
2D Mercy TAPE & 3D Mercy TAPE
Children'S Mercy Hospital
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database; Clinical human factors/usability study (ED nurses and first responders)
The NHANES database (17,328 children) was used to develop the Mercy Tape method algorithm, with an additional 1,938 datasets used for validation. A human factors study involving 1,412 assessments by healthcare providers compared the device's performance and usability against existing weight estimation strategies in a clinical environment.
NHANES; Algorithm development; Human factors study; Pediatric weight estimation
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Mercy Tape Method Algorithm Development/Validation; Retrospective analysis of population-based survey data
Children 2 months to 16 years of age; Sample Size: 17,328 (development) + 1,938 (validation)
Not applicable for this study
Predictive performance of weight estimation algorithm
Human Factors/Usability Study; Observational clinical usability study
Emergency department (ED) nurses and first responders; Sample Size: 1,412 assessments
Visual estimation, APLS calculation, Broselow Tape, Devised Weight Estimation Method, and Luscombe and Owens formula
Speed, accuracy, precision, and ease of use
Indications for Use
The Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) is intended to estimate the body weight of pediatric patients between the ages of 2 months and 16 years, using linear measurements from specific anatomical landmarks made with the Mercy TAPE Device for humeral length (HL, for the 2D Model) or half-humeral length (HHL, for the 3D Model) and the mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC). The Mercy TAPE Device may be less reliable for use in children with known or apparent limb deformities, or abnormal body proportions caused by conditions such as edema or severe malnutrition. Rx only.
Device Story
Device consists of flexible strips (paper, fabric, or plastic) printed with weight-proportional bins. 2D model uses single strip for humeral length and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC); 3D model uses two perpendicular strips in a sliding 'T' shape for half-humeral length and MUAC. Used by clinicians (nurses, first responders) in clinical settings (e.g., ED). Operator measures specific anatomical landmarks; reads weight estimate directly from tape markings. Algorithm (Mercy Method) converts linear measurements to weight. Provides rapid, indirect weight estimation for pediatric patients where direct weighing is difficult. Benefits include improved accuracy over visual estimation or other formulas in emergency contexts.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical studies evaluated predictive performance and equivalence to the Mercy Tape method algorithm. Algorithm developed using NHANES data (n=17,328) and validated with 1,938 datasets. Human factors/usability study (n=1,412 assessments) compared device against visual estimation, APLS, Broselow Tape, Devised Weight Estimation Method, and Luscombe/Owens formula. Results showed no significant difference in ease of use; critical task error rates were similar to or lower than standard medical equipment (scales, stadiometers). Device demonstrated higher accuracy in weight estimation compared to existing strategies.
Technological Characteristics
Manual, non-powered, hand-manipulated tape measure. Materials: coated paper, fabric, or plastic. Form factor: 2D (single strip) or 3D (sliding 'T' shape). Operation: manual measurement of humeral length and mid-upper arm circumference; indirect weight determination via printed algorithm-based bins. Single-patient use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for pediatric patients aged 2 months to 16 years to estimate body weight. Contraindicated/less reliable for patients with limb deformities or abnormal body proportions due to edema or severe malnutrition.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A manual surgical instrument for general use is a nonpowered, hand-held, or hand manipulated device, either reusable or disposable, intended to be used in various general surgical procedures. The device includes the applicator, clip applier, biopsy brush, manual dermabrasion brush, scrub brush, cannula, ligature carrier, chisel, clamp, contractor, curette, cutter, dissector, elevator, skin graft expander, file, forceps, gouge, instrument guide, needle guide, hammer, hemostat, amputation hook, ligature passing and knot-tying instrument, knife, mallet, disposable or reusable aspiration and injection needle, disposable or reusable suturing needle, osteotome, pliers, rasp, retainer, retractor, saw, scalpel blade, scalpel handle, one-piece scalpel, snare, spatula, stapler, disposable or reusable stripper, stylet, suturing apparatus for the stomach and intestine, measuring tape, and calipers. A surgical instrument that has specialized uses in a specific medical specialty is classified in separate regulations in parts 868 through 892 of this chapter.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is often associated with medicine and healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the symbol. The logo is black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
May 1, 2015
Children's Mercy Hospital c/o Mr. Jan S. Peterson The EMMES Corporation 401 N Washington Street, Suite 700 Rockville, MD 20850
Re: K142469
Trade/Device Name: Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4800 Regulation Name: Manual Surgical Instrument for General Use Regulatory Class: I Product Code: PIR Dated: March 31, 2015 Received: April 1, 2015
Dear Mr. Peterson:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Tina
Kiang -S
for Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K142469
Device Name Mercy TAPE device (2D and 3D models)
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Mercy TAPE device (2D and 3D models) is intended to estimate the body weight of pediatric patients between the ages of 2 months and 16 years, using linear measurements from specific anatomical landmarks made with the Mercy TAPE device for humeral length (HL, for the 2D model) or half-humeral length (HHL, for the 3D model) and the midupper arm circumference (MUAC).
The Mercy TAPE device may be less reliable for use in children with known or apparent limb deformities, or abnormal body proportions caused by conditions such as edema or severe malnutrition.
#### Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
#### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 6. 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) summary is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.87(h).
## A. Submitter's Information
| Name: | Susan Abdel-Rahman, PharmD |
|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | Professor of Pediatrics<br>Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Medical Toxicology<br>Children's Mercy Hospital<br>2401 Gilham Road, RB 3730.06<br>Kansas City, MO 64108-4619 |
| Phone: | 816-234-3059 |
| Fax: | 816-855-1958 |
| E-mail: | srahman@cmh.edu |
| Correspondent: | Jan S. Peterson, MS, CCRA, RAC<br>The Emmes Corporation<br>401 N. Washington Street, Suite 700<br>Rockville, MD 20850-1785<br>301-251-1161<br>jpeterson@emmes.com |
| Date of Summary: | April 30, 2015 |
## B. Device Information
| Device Name: | Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 878.4800 |
| Regulation Name: | Manual surgical instrument for general use, Tape Measure |
| Regulatory Class: | I |
| Product Code: | PIR |
| Panel: | General Hospital |
## C. Predicate Device Information
| Manufacturer: | Pfizer, Inc. |
|--------------------|--------------|
| Product Name: | Tape Measure |
| 510(k) Number: | K790089 |
| Product code: | FTY |
| Regulation Number: | 878.4800 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### D. Reference Devices
#### a) Scale, Stand-on, Patient
| Manufacturer: | SR Instruments Inc. |
|--------------------|---------------------|
| Product Name: | Daily-weight |
| 510(k) Number: | K770848 |
| Product code: | FRI |
| Regulation Number: | 880.2700 |
#### b) Scale, Patient
| Manufacturer: | U.S. Medical Corp |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Product Name: | U.S. Medical PS-2000 Pediatric Scale |
| 510(k) Number: | K910582 |
| Product code: | FRW |
| Regulation Number: | 880.2720 |
#### E. Device Description
The Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) consists of semi-durable or disposable flexible strips of coated paper, fabric or plastic tape printed with numbered bins proportional to fractional body weight of pediatric patients. The markings correspond to the validated Mercy Method (calculation algorithm) for determining pediatric body weight using humeral length and mid-upper arm circumference.
The Mercy TAPE Device 2D Model consists of a single strip of tape that is used in two (2) stages to measure humeral length and mid-upper arm circumference. For the Mercy TAPE Device 3D Model, two (2) perpendicular strips of tape are designed to be joined into a sliding "T" shape so that humeral length and mid-upper arm circumference can be measured.
## F. Intended Use
The Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) is intended to estimate the body weight of pediatric patients between the ages of 2 months and 16 years, using linear measurements from specific anatomical landmarks made with the Mercy TAPE Device for humeral length (HL, for the 2D Model) or half-humeral length (HHL, for the 3D Model) and the mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC).
The Mercy TAPE Device may be less reliable for use in children with known or apparent limb deformities, or abnormal body proportions caused by conditions such as edema or severe malnutrition.
Rx only.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| | G. Summary of comparison with predicate device and reference devices | |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Attribute | Mercy TAPE<br>Device (2D and 3D<br>Models) | Predicate device:<br>Tape Measure<br>(K790089)<br>Product Code<br>FTY | Reference device:<br>Stand-on Patient<br>Scale (K770848)<br>Product Code FRI | Reference device:<br>Patient Scale<br>(K910582)<br>Product Code<br>FRW |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | The Mercy TAPE<br>Device (2D and 3D<br>Models) are<br>intended to be used<br>for estimating the<br>weight of a<br>pediatric patient by<br>measuring the<br>length of specific<br>body parts | A tape measure is a<br>device intended to<br>be used in various<br>general surgical<br>procedures for<br>measuring length of<br>parts of the body | A stand-on patient<br>scale is a device<br>intended for<br>medical purposes<br>that is used to<br>weigh a patient<br>who is able to stand<br>on the scale<br>platform | A patient scale is a<br>device intended for<br>medical purposes<br>that is used to<br>measure the weight<br>of a patient who<br>cannot stand on a<br>scale. |
| Use for general<br>use | Yes | Yes | Yes (when patient<br>can stand) | Yes |
| Anthropometric<br>measurement | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Length<br>measurement of<br>body part | Yes, converted to<br>weight | Yes | No | No |
| Weight<br>Determination | Yes, based upon<br>measured length of<br>body parts | No | Yes | Yes |
| Weight<br>determination<br>method | Indirect | No | Direct | Direct |
| Output Display | View markings on<br>device and add<br>indicated values | View markings on<br>device | View display<br>indicator on device | View display<br>indicator on device |
| Requires<br>Electrical<br>Power | No | No | Optional | Optional |
| Hand-<br>manipulated<br>device | Yes | Yes | Optional | Optional |
| Reusable | Labeled for Single<br>Patient Use | Yes | Yes | Yes |
{6}------------------------------------------------
## H. Performance Evaluation - Clinical Testing
Clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of the Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) and their equivalence to the underlying Mercy Tape method algorithm. Non-clinical studies were not performed. In the clinical studies, the device shows acceptably small variability from true weight with minimal bias. The Mercy Tape method algorithm was developed using demographic and anthropometric data on 17,328 individual children 2 months to 16 years of age from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. In addition, 1,938 datasets were used for method validation.
A separate human factors/usability study was also conducted utilizing the Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) to examine the speed, accuracy and precision with which "front-line" health care providers could apply the Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models). The study included emergency department (ED) nurses and first responders who conducted 1,412 assessments comparing the Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) to all five of the most common weight estimation strategies, including visual estimation, Advanced Pediatric Life Support (APLS) calculation, Broselow Tape, Devised Weight Estimation Method, and the Luscombe and Owens formula. Our human factors/usability analyses reveal no significant differences in subjective determinations for ease of use between the Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) and existing weight estimation strategies. In addition, the critical task errors observed with the Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) occur with a frequency similar to or lower than the error rates observed with standard medical equipment (e.g., scales, stadiometers, and tape measures). Importantly, even when factoring in errors and close-calls, the estimated weights generated by the Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) are more accurate than the weights returned with existing weight estimation strategies.
#### I. Comparison to the Predicate Device and Conclusion
The Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) shares certain common features with the predicate comparator device, namely the simple tape measure, in that it assesses simple anthropometric measurements. The Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models), however, provides an estimation of body weight based on an algorithm that is unique to the device. The Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) uses linear anthropometric body measurements to derive estimated body weight, and this has been validated against scales that use mechanical strain or balance methods to obtain an estimate of body weight. The clinical testing indicates that the Mercy TAPE Device (2D and 3D Models) is substantially equivalent to the predicate comparator device and was validated against a mechanical scale to demonstrate equivalent performance.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.