K142428 · Cybersonics, Inc. · FEO · Nov 13, 2014 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K142428
Device Name
Shock Pulse-SE Lithotripsy System CYBERWAND II
Applicant
Cybersonics, Inc.
Product Code
FEO · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Nov 13, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.4480
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System is intended to be used for the fragmentation of urinary tract calculi in the kidney, ureter and bladder.
Device Story
Electromechanical lithotripsy system for fragmentation and aspiration of urinary tract calculi. Handpiece contains ultrasonic transducer with piezoelectric elements driven by ~21,000 Hz generator. System transmits stress-waves via hollow probes to calculi; simultaneous suction removes fragments. Suction control integrated into transducer housing via thumb wheel. Operator (physician) uses handpiece buttons or footswitch to activate standard/high power modes. Device used in clinical/OR settings. Provides faster stone drilling/removal compared to predicate; reduces retropulsion compared to pneumatic lithotripters. Benefits include efficient stone fragmentation, reduced procedure setup time, and ergonomic design.
Clinical Evidence
Bench-only testing and simulated-use animal labs. Performance metrics: CyberWand II 3.76 probe drills 10% faster and removes mass 20% faster than predicate. Retropulsion testing showed less impact force than pneumatic comparator. Tissue perforation potential evaluated in porcine kidney model; no significant tissue damage observed. Transducer/wrench life cycle (50 cycles) and probe reliability confirmed. Electrical safety (IEC 60601-1) and EMC (CISPR 11) compliance verified.
Technological Characteristics
Electromechanical ultrasonic lithotripter. Piezoelectric transducer; 21,000 Hz generator. Patient-contact material: stainless steel. Probes: 0.97 mm to 3.76 mm OD. Connectivity: footswitch. Power: electrical. Sterilization: EO (sterile probes) or steam (reusable components). Software: Moderate level of concern. Features: auto-tune, constant probe displacement, integrated suction control.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the fragmentation of urinary tract calculi in the kidney, ureter, and bladder in patients requiring lithotripsy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrohydraulic lithotriptor is an AC-powered device used to fragment urinary bladder stones. It consists of a high voltage source connected by a cable to a bipolar electrode that is introduced into the urinary bladder through a cystoscope. The electrode is held against the stone in a water-filled bladder and repeated electrical discharges between the two poles of the electrode cause electrohydraulic shock waves which disintegrate the stone.
Special Controls
The special control for this device is FDA's “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications for Intracorporeal Lithotripters.”
Predicate Devices
CyberWand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy System (K120303)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of two main elements: a circular text element and a symbol. The text element reads "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement. The symbol is a stylized representation of a human figure, with three profiles overlapping to create a sense of depth and connection.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 13, 2014
Cybersonics, Inc. Jeff Vaitekunas Vice President of R&D 5340 Fryling Road Erie. PA 16510
Re: K142428
Trade/Device Name: Shock Pulse-SE Lithotripsy System CyberWand II Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.4480 Regulation Name: Electrohydraulic Lithotriptor Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FEO Dated: August 27, 2014 Received: August 29, 2014
Dear Jeff Vaitekunas,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Benjamin R. Fisher -A
Benjamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K142428
Device Name ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System
#### CYBERWAND II
Indications for Use (Describe)
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System is intended to be used for the fragmentation of urinary tract calcul in the kidney, ureter and bladder.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, sans-serif">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, sans-serif">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Cybersonics, Inc. The logo features a stylized letter 'C' in blue, with the company name written in black, sans-serif font below it. The 'C' is drawn with a thick line that curves around and has a small break in the upper part of the letter. The overall design is simple and modern.
# CYBERSONICS TRADITIONAL 510(k) SUBMISSION ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) K142428
510(k) Summary for ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II)
# Contact Information for Cybersonics, Inc.
Jeff Vaitekunas
Vice President of Regulatory Affairs
Cybersonics, Inc.
5340 Fryling Road
Erie, Pennsylvania 16510
Phone: 814-920-1521
Fax: 814-898-4737
jvaitekunas@cybersonics-inc.com
This Summary was prepared on June 20, 2014. This Summary was revised on November 12, 2014.
#### Trade Name
- Proprietary: ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System CYBERWAND II
- Common: Lithotripter, Ultrasonic Intracorporeal
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Classification
Product Code FEO (lithotripter, ultrasonic) Class II, 21 CFR 876.4480 - Electrohydraulic lithotripter
# Predicate Device
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) described in this Traditional 510(k) Submission is, in our opinion, substantially equivalent to the predicate device, CyberWand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy System (K120303).
# Product Description
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) is the next generation of the CyberWand System. The ShockPulse-SE is an electromechanical device, whose intended purpose is to fragment and aspirate calculi. The hand piece consists of an ultrasonic transducer containing piezoelectric elements which are driven by a generator operating at approximately 21,000 Hz. The transducer is lightweight and incorporates two contact switches that activate Standard Power and High Power generator output. Activation will either require continuous pushing of the button or a double click to latch activation on; a single click of either button would then turn activation off. There are markings near the buttons to indicate function.
Suction control is integrated into the transducer housing. With a thumb wheel that can rotate approximately 20 degrees, the flow can be varied from "full" on to "off." There are markings on the transducer to indicate which direction increases and decreases suction flow through the transducer lumen.
{5}------------------------------------------------
# CYBERSONICS TRADITIONAL 510(k) SUBMISSION ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) K142428
There are families of probes that function similar to the probes of the current CyberWand System (K120303) by transmitting stress-waves from the transducer to the calculi to break up kidney-stones. Hollow probes permit simultaneous suction. The direct patient-contact material is stainless steel, which is the same material used in the predicate system.
# Indications for Use Statement
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) is intended to be used for the fragmentation of urinary tract calculi in the kidney, ureter and bladder.
#### Substantial Equivalence Rationale
The ShockPulse Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) is substantially equivalent to the:
- CyberWand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND) . (K120303)
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) has the following similarities to the predicate device CyberWand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy System that previously received 510(k) clearance (K120303):
- Indications for use
- Free mass enhanced ultrasonic technology
- Basic design
- . Patient contact materials
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) is the next generation of the CyberWand System. Key differences between the ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System and predicate device are:
{6}------------------------------------------------
- . Generator:
- o addition of an auto-tune feature (versus manual tuning to match the transducer's resonant frequency),
- o addition of circuitry to provide probe constant probe displacement under various loading conditions, and
- o a redesigned housing to be more ergonomic.
- . Transducer:
- o addition of power activation buttons (providing an option to using the footswitch),
- o addition of a suction control knob, and
- o a redesigned housing to be more ergonomic.
- . Probes:
- o change from a dual tube probe design to a single tube design, and
- o expanding the previous range of probe sizes (3.76 and 1.65 mm OD) to include four new models (3.40, 1.83, 1.50, and 0.97 mm OD).
- . Wrench:
- o the standard wrench was modified to limit the applied torque when attaching the probe to the transducer.
The remaining system components are similar or unchanged: footswitch, nosecone, and cleaning stylets.
# Performance Data
The safety and effectiveness of the ShockPulse SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) is determined primarily by confirming that its design and performances conform to the established national and international standards, protocols applicable to lithotripters and the FDA document, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications for Intracorporeal Lithotripters". The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) performs as well as or
{7}------------------------------------------------
# CYBERSONICS TRADITIONAL 510(k) SUBMISSION ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) K142428
better than the predicate device. The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) complies with the requirements of each the standards and protocols discussed below.
# Performance Considerations
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (also known as the CyberWand II) was evaluated extensively for performance using bench-top tests and a series of simulated-use animal labs. Below are outlines of the individual tests performed:
# CyberWand II Performance Analysis for Stone Breakage
- Demonstrating the performance (mass removal and . stone drilling) of the CyberWand II compared to the predicate CyberWand I.
- o The CyberWand II 3.76 probe drills through a stone at least 10% faster than the CyberWand I 3.76 Dual Probe.
- o The CyberWand II 3.76 probe removes mass at least 20% faster than the CyberWand I 3.76 Dual Probe.
- Demonstrating the retropulsion of the CyberWand II . ureteral probe compared to the LithoClast pneumatic. The LithoClast is a competitively marketed lithotripter.
- The CyberWand II 1.65 probe has less impact ● force than the LithoClast pneumatic ureteral probe.
Equivalent stone breakage for the smallest probe size (0.97 mm solid probe) is supported by stone breakage measurements and identification of
{8}------------------------------------------------
a reference device with an 0.8 mm ultrasonic probe (K111058, Med-Sonics Corp. UreTron Multi Probe Lithotripter).
CyberWand II Transducer and Torque Wrench Life Cycle Analysis (50 Cycles)
- Demonstrating the transducer and torque wrench performance . does not degrade over 50 simulated use cycles and that every aspect of the transducer is functional after 50 simulated use cycles. The following characteristics were evaluated:
- · Performance
- o Mass Removal
- o Drill Rate
- o Probe Tip Displacement
- . Functionality
- o Suction Control
- o Transducer Button Activation Switches
- . Safety
- o Electrical Safety (Patient Leakage Current)
- Appearance Quality ●
- o Black Anodize
- o Laser Etching
# CyberWand II Probe Reliability and Reusability Analysis
- . Demonstrating probes are functional after a single simulated use. This tested for the probes to be capable of 5x typical use time.
Note: The probes are to be labeled single use.
{9}------------------------------------------------
# CyberWand II IEC 61847 Evaluation
- Demonstrating the output characteristics of the CyberWand II . system including all probe sizes compared to the CyberWand I 3.76 mm dual probe.
- Demonstrating less probe tip displacement (101 microns peak-. to-peak) compared to the predicate CyberWand I (102 microns peak-to-peak) as evidence for a safe and substantially equivalent next generation lithotripter.
# Tissue Perforation Testing (Performed on the predicate CyberWand I)
# Dr. Evans' Pig Kidney Test
- The Pig Kidney Test supported the safety of the largest probe size (3.76 mm).
- In vitro testing was performed to determine the type of tissue . damage induced by the CyberWand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy System and LithoClast Ultra when placed in contact with the surface of a freshly harvested porcine kidney. The CyberWand consistently induced less kidney tissue damage than the LithoClast Ultra using a visual assessment methodology.
- The ShockPulse SE system was designed and tested to have ● equal or less maximum tip amplitude than the CyberWand Dual Action Ultrasonic Lithotripsy System. Further, the CyberWand ShockPulse SE system was tested in simulated use conditions by several physicians in the porcine model; and no significant tissue damage occurred.
{10}------------------------------------------------
- Equivalent tissue perforation potential for the smallest probe . size (0.97 mm) is supported by identification of a reference device with an 0.8 mm ultrasonic probe (K111058, Med-Sonics Corp. UreTron Multi Probe Lithotripter).
# CyberWand II Torque Wrench Performance
- Demonstrating a consistent torque specification of 35-40 inch . pounds.
# CyberWand II Generator and Footswitch Life Cycle Analysis
- Demonstrating a useful life of 7 years for the generator. ●
- . Demonstrating footswitch durability and IPX6 rating.
# CyberWand II Shipping and Handling Durability Verification and Validation
- Demonstrating system functionality after being run through . rigorous simulated shipping and handling.
# Noise Evaluation of CyberWand II Transducer
- Demonstrating less noise output of the CyberWand II compared . to the CyberWand I.
# Surface Temperature Profile of the CyberWand II Aluminum Transducer
- Demonstrating that the surface temperature of the transducer ● stabilizes at an acceptable level while running with aspiration. The acceptable level is defined by IEC 60601-1.
- . Demonstrating that the surface temperature of the CyberWand II transducer stabilizes at a lower temperature than the CyberWand I while running with and without aspiration.
{11}------------------------------------------------
#### Setup Steps - CyberWand and CyberWand II ShockPulse SE
- Demonstrating the number of setup steps is less for the ● CyberWand II as compared to the CyberWand I.
- o The CyberWand II has 37.5% fewer steps which saves time in the Operating Room and reduces the probability of improper setup and a delay in procedure
Cybersonics' ShockPulse SE Usability Verification and Validation
- Demonstrating the ability for the CyberWand II 3.76, 1.65, and 0.97 to fragment simulated urinary tract calculi.
- Demonstrating the usability of the CyberWand II IFU and labeling. ●
- Demonstrating the CyberWand II meets customer needs. .
# Electrical Safety Considerations
The ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) is classified as IEC Electrical Safety Class I equipment, with a Type BF applied part that complies with IEC 60601-1:2005 30 Edition. The following is a list of testing related to the evaluation of the ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System for Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electrical Safety. All testing was conducted by Intertek.
IEC 60601-1, Medical electrical equipment, Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance.
Standards: IEC 60601-1: 2005 + CORR. 1 (2006) + CORR. 2 (2007)
# EMC Test Report
Standards: IEC 60601-1-2 ed3.0 (2007-03) With Voltage Deviations for Japan.
{12}------------------------------------------------
#### EMC Emissions Report
Standards: Radiated Emissions, CISPR 11:2009+A1:2010 per IEC 60601-1-2 ed3.0 (2007-03).
# Classification Constructional Data Report (CDR)
Standards: Medical electrical equipment, Part 1: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance, AAMI ES60601-1:2005, lssued: 2006/03/09: 2005 Version (R2012): with AMD C1: 2009, AMD 2: 2010
Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1: General Req. for Basic Safety & Essential Performance, CSA C22.2#60601-1, Issued: 2008/02/01 Ed: 2; Cor. 2: 2011.
# IEC Certificate US/5130/ITS
CB Test Certificate - Compliance with ISO 14971, as required by subclause 4.2, has been established by performing an inspection (desktop audit) of the Risk Management File.
Standards: ISO 14971, IEC 60601-1-6(ed.3), IEC 60601-1(ed.3), IEC 62366(ed.1).
The purpose of the Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Directive is to ensure the customer that all standards for manufacturing and operating the electronics of the device safely have been adhered to and followed. The EMC Directive also stipulates that the device will not emit radiation at levels that will interfere with other devices located nearby. Additionally, the EMC Directive ensures the device will not transmit electro-magnetic surges back into the power grid at frequencies and amplitudes that are above the values listed in the standard.
{13}------------------------------------------------
# Software Validation Considerations
Software validation for the life cycle operation has been performed according to the FDA's Moderate Level of Concern recommendations provided in the document "Guidance for the Content for Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices (5/29/98)."
#### Sterilization Validation Considerations
All probes except the SPL-PD376 are provided single patient use, nonsterile, and are cleaned and sterilized prior to use by the user in accordance with the directions provided in the system IFU. The SPL-PD376 probe is packaged sterile, single patient use, and is sterilized using the EO process outlined below.
# EO Sterilization for 3.76 mm single probe
MOOG Medical Device Group analyzed the differences between the predicate CyberWand I 3.76 Dual Probe (CW-RBP) and the present SPL-PD376 and has determined that the packaging and sterilization validations apply to the SPL-PD376 probes. The packaging and sterilization for the Shock Pulse SE Lithotripsy System probes are the same as described in K120303.
# 5 year shelf life sterile packaging
The SPL-PD376 probe is packaged sterile, single patient use, with a 5 year sterility shelf-life. It is sterilized using the EO process outlined above. 5-year shelf life has been assured with both accelerated and real-time ageing and subsequent testing. The 5 year shelf life of the SPL-PD376
{14}------------------------------------------------
probe is also supported by data submitted in reference device K132795. Subsequently real-time ageing was performed.
#### Cleaning and Steam Sterilization
The ShockPulse SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) probes, nose-cone, torque wrench, stylets and transducer are all provided non-sterile to the user, and are to be cleaned and sterilized in accordance with the instructions provided in the system IFU. Cleaning and sterilization validations were performed by MicroTest, and the reports are summarized below.
#### Cleaning Efficacy
Demonstrating a validated manual cleaning method for all components that are used in the sterile field.
# MicroTest Steam Efficacy
Demonstrating efficacy at the US steam sterilization cycle (4 minutes at 132 degrees C, 20 minute dry time).
4 double wrapped packs per load:
- Transducer and Nosecone ●
- Ultem Nose-cone .
- Torque Wrench .
- Probes and Stylets .
#### Dry Time Validation
Demonstrating adequate 20 minute dry time for a US steam sterilization cycle.
4 double wrapped packs per load:
- Transducer and Nosecone ●
- Ultem Nose-cone .
{15}------------------------------------------------
- Torque Wrench .
- Probes and Stylets .
# Conclusion
The performance testing summarized above demonstrates that the ShockPulse-SE Lithotripsy System (CYBERWAND II) is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.