K142327 · Art Healthcare , Ltd. · KNT · Jun 8, 2015 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K142327
Device Name
smARTrack Feeding Tube System
Applicant
Art Healthcare , Ltd.
Product Code
KNT · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Jun 8, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5980
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System is designed to aid qualified operators in the placement of the smARTrack Feeding Tube into the stomach of patients requiring enteral feeding. The smARTrack™ tube is equipped with sensors designed to provide information about the location of the tube tip relative to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) thus assisting in reducing the incidence of misplacement during first positioning. The smARTrack™ tube also monitors the position continuously during the course of the feeding and automatically and in real time alerts of tube migration. The smARTrack console is equipped with a motorized mechanism which automatically and in real-time stops feeding if the feeding tube moves out of position during ongoing use. Furthermore, smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System can guide operator to correctly re-position the tube. The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube is intended for gastric decompression, gastric lavage, and the administration of nutrition, fluids and medications by the naso-enteric route for patients who have an intact gastrointestinal tract but are physically unable to manage nutritional intake through normal mastication and deglutition.
Device Story
System uses sensor-lined naso-enteric feeding tubes to provide real-time location data relative to lower esophageal sphincter (LES); transmits data to external electronic console. Console provides visual guidance for initial tube placement; monitors tube position continuously during feeding. If migration occurs, system alerts operator; motorized mechanism automatically stops feeding. Used in clinical settings by qualified operators. Benefits include reduced risk of tube misplacement during insertion and prevention of complications from tube migration during ongoing use. Output allows healthcare providers to verify correct placement and ensure safe, continuous enteral nutrition delivery.
Clinical Evidence
Feasibility study conducted on 10 healthy volunteers. Primary endpoints: system functionality, safety, and ease of use. Results: 100% successful tube insertion; no major issues or unexpected adverse events reported; no incorrect placements occurred (verified by X-ray). Subjective feedback indicated procedure was well-tolerated. Bench and animal (pig) studies also performed to validate sensor accuracy, motorized stop mechanism, and biocompatibility.
Technological Characteristics
System includes multi-lumen feeding tube with integrated wired impedance sensors and electronic console. Materials evaluated per ISO 10993. Compliance with IEC 60601-1 (safety) and IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC). Features motorized mechanism for automatic feeding cessation. Software-controlled interface for guidance and event logging.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult patients requiring enteral feeding, gastric decompression, or gastric lavage who have an intact gastrointestinal tract but are unable to manage nutritional intake via normal mastication and deglutition.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A gastrointestinal tube and accessories is a device that consists of flexible or semi-rigid tubing used for instilling fluids into, withdrawing fluids from, splinting, or suppressing bleeding of the alimentary tract. This device may incorporate an integral inflatable balloon for retention or hemostasis. This generic type of device includes the hemostatic bag, irrigation and aspiration catheter (gastric, colonic, etc.), rectal catheter, sterile infant gavage set, gastrointestinal string and tubes to locate internal bleeding, double lumen tube for intestinal decompression or intubation, feeding tube, gastroenterostomy tube, Levine tube, nasogastric tube, single lumen tube with mercury weight balloon for intestinal intubation or decompression, and gastro-urological irrigation tray (for gastrological use).
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The barium enema retention catheter and tip with or without a bag that is a gastrointestinal tube and accessory or a gastronomy tube holder accessory is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.(2) Class I (general controls) for the dissolvable nasogastric feed tube guide for the nasogastric tube. The class I device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 876.9.
Kangaroo™ Feeding Tube with IRIS Technology (K123555)
ZepHr Impedance/pH Reflux Monitoring System (K012232)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features the department's name in a circular arrangement around an emblem. The emblem is a stylized design of three human profiles facing right, with flowing lines connecting them.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
June 8, 2015
ART Healthcare Ltd. % Bosmat Friedman Regulatory Affairs Consultant MJ RAC 1208-12 Rockford Rd. Toronto, ON M2R 3A2 Canada
Re: K142327
> Trade/Device Name: smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System smARTrack™ Feeding Tube Regulation Number: 21 CFR \$876.5980 Regulation Name: Gastrointestinal tube and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KNT Dated: April 30, 2015 Received: May 1, 2015
Dear Bosmat Friedman.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act
{1}------------------------------------------------
or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
Herbert P. Lerner -S
for Benjamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal, and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System can guide operator to correctly re-position the tube.
510(k) Number (if known) K142327
Device Name smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System is designed to aid qualified operators in the smARTrack Feeding Tube into the stomach of patients requiring enteral feeding. The smARTrack™ tube is equipped with sensors designed to provide information about the location of the tube tip relative to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) thus assisting in reducing the incidence of misplacement during first positioning. The smARTack™ tube also monitors the position continuously during the course of the feeding and automatically and in real time alerts of tube migration. The smARTrack equipped with a motorized mechanism which automatically and in real-time stops feeding tube moves out of position during ongoing use. Furthermore,
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
{3}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K142327
Device Name smARTrack™ Feeding Tube
Indications for Use (Describe)
The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube is intended for gastric decompression, gastric lavage, and the administration of nutrition, fluids and medications by the naso-enteric route for patients who have an intact gastrointestinal tract but are manage nutritional intake through normal mastication and deglutition.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(K) SUMMARY
# [as required by section 807.92(c)] smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System and smARTrack™ Feeding Tube 510(k) Number K142327
#### 1. SUBMITTER
### Applicant's Name:
ART Healthcare Ltd. Hashlosha 7 Even-Yehuda. 4053423. Israel Phone: +972-9-7711065
### Contact Person:
Bosmat Friedman Regulatory Affairs Consultant; MJ RAC 1208-12 Rockford Rd. Toronto, ON, M2R 3A2, Canada Phone: 647-975-3974; Fax: 647-427-1946; bosmat@pushmed.com
### Date Prepared (revised): June 5, 2015
#### 2. DEVICE
### Trade Name:
smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System smARTrack™ Feeding Tube
### Common or Usual Name:
Gastrointestinal tube and accessories
### Classification:
Name: Gastrointestinal tube and accessories Product Code: KNT Regulation No: 876.5980 Class: 2 Classification Panel: Gastroenterology/Urology
#### 3. PREDICATE DEVICES
### Main predicate:
· CORTRAK 2 Enteral Access Device by CORPAK MedSystems; K113351 Reference devices:
- · KangarooTM Feeding Tube with IRIS Technology by Covidien; K123555
- · ZepHr Impedance/pH Reflux Monitoring System by Sandhill Scientific Inc .; K012232
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### 4. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System is based on sensor-lined tubes that transmit real-time information to an external console. The information relayed to the console is used to transmit information about the location of the tube tip relative to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES).
The smARTrack™ System contains the following:
- a) Feeding tube (multi-lumen, feeding inlet compatible with standard gravity bag unit and impedance sensors)
- b) Electronic console which: indicate the location of the tube in the body, stops the feeding in case of overfeeding and keep a patient event log.
#### ട്. INDICATIONS FOR USE
### smARTrack™ Feeding Tube
The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube is intended for gastric decompression, gastric lavage, and the administration of nutrition, fluids and medications by the nasoenteric route for patients who have an intact gastrointestinal tract but are physically unable to manage nutritional intake through normal mastication and deglutition.
### smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System
The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System is designed to aid qualified operators in the placement of the smARTrack Feeding Tube into the stomach of patients requiring enteral feeding. The smARTrack™ tube is equipped with sensors designed to provide information about the location of the tube tip relative to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) thus assisting in reducing the incidence of misplacement during first positioning. The smARTrack™ tube also monitors the position continuously during the course of the feeding and automatically and in real time alerts of tube migration. The smARTrack console is equipped with a motorized mechanism which automatically and in real-time stops feeding if the feeding tube moves out of position during ongoing use. Furthermore, smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System can guide operator to correctly re-position the tube.
### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE 6. PREDICATE DEVICE
The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System is comprised of an electronic console which holds the system software and serves as the guiding interface to the user during initial tube placement as well as during ongoing use. The console also provides an alert when the system senses that the tube has moved out of position during ongoing use and automatically stops feeding using a motorized mechanism if such an event occurs. The feeding tube incorporates wired impedance sensors which transmit real-time information to the console regarding the feeding tube location relative to the lower esophageal sphincter.
The CORTRAK is comprised of a Monitor Unit which guides the user during initial tube placement and is also attached to a feeding tube. However, the CORTRAK utilizes an electromagnetic sensing stylet to track the path of feeding tube during a
{6}------------------------------------------------
placement procedure. The CORTRAK is dependent on the Stylet with a small coil (Transmitter) located at the tip. This Stylet is an integral part of the feeding tube inserted into a patient's stomach or small bowel but is removed after placement thus no continuous placement verification available. A Receiver Unit is placed at the Xiphoid Process to track the position of the Stylet during placement (the movement of the tube). The Receiver is attached by a cable to the Monitor Unit which then provides a graphical display of the feeding tube tip path and provides feedback to the user for proper placement.
Both systems achieve correct feeding tube placement by utilizing a different technology.
In an effort to bridge this technological gap, the smARTrack™ System has undergone bench, ex-vivo animal and clinical testing to ensure it functions correctly and achieves proper placement as well as correctly identifies tube malposition during the course of feeding. The performance data is provided in various sections of this submission. The system has successfully demonstrated its ability to guide the user in correct feeding tube placement. The system also correctly identifies tube movement and the automatic mechanism which stops the feeding has also been validated.
In the clinical study which was conducted, tube placement was initially verified with the System and a confirmatory X-Ray ("gold standard" placement verification) was performed. In all cases the System successfully guided the user to ensure correct placement was achieved.
The available performance data supports the safety and effectiveness profile of the system and negates the technological differences between the smARTrack and its predicate devices.
The CORTRAK feeding tubes are available in 8, 10 and 12 Fr. The smARTrack feeding tube is available in 14Fr only. There are many FDA cleared feeding tubes which are available in various sizes ranging from 6 to 21 Fr. Therefore, this difference in tube diameter does not raise any new safety or effectiveness concerns as both devices are intended to be used in adult patients. Furthermore, biocompatibility tests were also performed to ensure the tubes are safe for use.
The operational principle of the impedance sensors incorporated in the feeding tube is similar to that of FDA cleared Sandhill scientific zephyr impedance probe device. Both the smARTrack feeding Tube and the Sandhill are designed to be used in the upper GI tract; therefore, no new safety and effectiveness concerns are raised as a result of incorporating the impedance sensors in the feeding tube.
#### 7. PERFORMANCE DATA
Below is a list of the tests that have been performed and successfully completed for the smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System.
# Biocompatibility:
The biocompatibility evaluation for the smARTrack System feeding tube was conducted in accordance with the FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1 "Use of International Standard ISO-10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing,"" May 1, 1995, and International Standard ISO 10993-1 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within
{7}------------------------------------------------
a Risk Management Process," as recognized by FDA. The feeding tube component is considered a surface contacting devices with prolonged mucosal membrane contact. The battery of testing included the following tests:
- Cytotoxicity Study Using the ISO Elution Method -
- -Systemic Injection Test
- ISO Intracutaneous Study in Rabbits -
- -Implantation and Subacute Toxicity Study in the Rabbit
# Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC):
The system was tested and found to comply with IEC 60601-1:2005/EN 60601-1:2006 Medical electrical equipment -Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance3rd Ed and IEC 60601-1-2:2007 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements and tests.
### Software Verification and Validation Testing:
Software verification and validation testing were conducted and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices." The software for this device was considered as a "moderate" level of concern, since a failure or latent flaw in the software could result in minor injury to the patient.
### Bench:
- Minimal bending possible to the tube -
- smARTrack feeding tube in HCL -
- -Evaluation of the tensile properties
- Liquid leakage test -
- Lumen flow rate measurements -
- Resistance to leakage during aspiration or vacuum -
- Misconnection testing -
- -Motorized mechanism performance during displacement
### Animal:
- -Ex-Vivo Testing:
The study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the Interactive Nasogastric Tubes (INGT) and System (i.e., smART/smARTrack System). The study was conducted utilizing adult pig's stomach, trachea and esophagus without hernia. Proper functionality of the sensors was confirmed.
- -In-Vivo Testing:
The study was conducted to evaluate the following: safe operation of the feeding tube without damaging the esophagus or the stomach, effectiveness of the feeding using the impedance sensors, right position of the feeding tube in the LES by using the location sensors, ability of controlling and stopping the feeding operation.
The study was conducted on an adult pig (60kg) under anesthesia.
{8}------------------------------------------------
The study confirmed that the Feeding Tube position sensors work very well and identify the correct location of the LES.
### Clinical:
A feasibility study was conducted on 10 healthy volunteers to assess the functionality and safety of the system. No unexpected Adverse Events were reported. Tube insertions in all subjects were successful with no major issues reported. The entire procedure was pretty well tolerated by the subjects. Most patients that undergo feeding tube insertion experience some pain and discomfort and therefore none of the feedback that was received from the healthy volunteers was unexpected. It should be noted that the main target population for the system would be unconscious or anesthetized patients for whom minor pain and discomfort would be negligible. Furthermore, according to the patients subjective feedback, throughout the procedure, no severs pain or discomfort was recorded.
The convenience of the feeding tube insertion was assessed via questionnaires completed by the clinical staff. Correct placement of the tube was verified via X-Ray. No incorrect placements occurred while using the feeding tube.
### Conclusion:
The smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System has similar intended use as CORTRAK and similar indications for use as the CORTRAK and Kangaroo predicate devices. Furthermore, the smARTrack™ is substantially equivalent in technological and performance characteristics to the CORTRAK predicate as well as to the two reference devices (Kangaroo™ and ZepHr).
Consequently, it is clear that the smARTrack™ Feeding Tube System is as safe and effective as its predicate devices without raising any new safety and/or effectiveness concerns. Any differences have been addressed by extensive testing and validations and therefore negate any safety or effectiveness concerns.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.