PRODIGY AUTOCODE EJECT BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM
Applicant
Ok Biotech Co., Ltd.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Apr 15, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
Prodigy® AutoCode® Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upper arm, palm, calf or thigh. The Prodigy® AutoCode® Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The Prodigy® AutoCode® Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Prodigy® AutoCode® Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes, or for neonatal use. The alternative site testing should be done only during steady-state times (when glucose is not changing rapidly). PRODIGY® No Coding Test Strips are intended for use with the PRODIGY® AutoCode® Eject blood glucose meter to measure the concentration of the blood glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upper arm, palm, calf or thigh for self-testing at home. They are for testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use only). Do not use them for diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes or for testing on neonates. PRODIGY® No Coding Test Strips are used as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. This system contains a speaking function, but is not intended for use by the visually impaired.
Device Story
System measures capillary whole blood glucose via amperometric assay using glucose oxidase reagent on test strips; requires >0.7 µL sample. Meter processes electrical current proportional to glucose concentration; displays result; includes voice function; stores/averages results. Used by patients at home for diabetes management. Output informs patient of blood glucose level to monitor diabetes control. Not for diagnosis or neonatal use. Alternative site testing restricted to steady-state conditions. Single-patient use; includes disinfection protocols for infection control.
Clinical Evidence
Non-clinical testing performed per FDA guidance for In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems. No specific clinical trial data or performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) provided in the summary document.
Indicated for quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood (fingertip, palm, forearm, upper arm, calf, thigh) for single-patient home use by people with diabetes to monitor glycemic control. Contraindicated for neonatal use, diabetes screening/diagnosis, and use on critically ill, shock, dehydrated, or hyper-osmolar patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
PRODIGY Preferred® Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k122338)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k141914
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Capillary whole blood glucose from finger, palm, forearm, upper arm, calf or thigh.
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative amperometric assay (Glucose oxidase)
E. Applicant:
OK BIOTECH CO. LTD.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Prodigy AutoCode Eject™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1345, Glucose test system
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
NBW, System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over the Counter
CGA, Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Prodigy® AutoCode® Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upper arm, palm, calf or thigh. The Prodigy® AutoCode® Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The Prodigy® AutoCode® Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Prodigy® AutoCode® Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes, or for neonatal use. The alternative site testing should be done only during steady-state times (when glucose is not changing rapidly).
PRODIGY® No Coding Test Strips are intended for use with the PRODIGY® AutoCode® Eject blood glucose meter to measure the concentration of the blood glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upper arm, palm, calf or thigh for self-testing at home. They are for testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use only). Do not use them for diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes or for testing on neonates. PRODIGY® No Coding Test Strips are used as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
This system contains a speaking function, but is not intended for use by the visually impaired.
3. Special conditions for use:
- For over-the-counter use
- Not for neonatal use
- Not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Not for use on critically ill patients, patients in shock, dehydrated patients or hyper-osmolar patients
- For single-patient use only
- Alternative site testing (AST) testing should only be done during steady-state times (when glucose is not changing rapidly, for example after meals, exercise, or after taking insulin.).
- AST should not be used to calibrate continuous glucose monitors (CGMs).
- AST should not be used for insulin dose calculations.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Prodigy AutoCode Eject™ Blood Glucose Meter
{2}
3
I. Device Description:
The Prodigy Auto Code Eject™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of the Prodigy Auto Code Eject Blood Glucose Meter, Prodigy No Coding Test Strips and two levels of Prodigy Control Solutions (Level 1 and Level 2). The System also comprises batteries, a carrying case, lancets, and User Manual. The Prodigy Auto Code Eject Blood Glucose Meter includes a voice function, and the ability to store and average blood test results.
Each test strip contains the following reagent composition: Glucose oxidase (Aspergillus Niger) 0.4%, Potassium ferricyanide 3.8% and other non-reactive ingredients. The Prodigy No Coding Test Strips are available for purchase separately.
Each vial of control solutions contains 4.0mL of Level or Level 2 Prodigy Control Solution. These control solutions are available for purchase separately.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
PRODIGY Preferred® Blood Glucose Monitoring System
2. Predicate K number(s):
k122338
2. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate Device k122338 PRODIGY Preferred® Blood Glucose Monitoring System | Candidate Device k141914 Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System |
| Indications for Use | It is intended for quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary blood by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. | Same |
| Test strip used | Prodigy No Coding Test Strips | Same |
| Control solutions used | Prodigy Control Solution Level 1/Level 2 | Same |
| Detection method | amperometric | Same |
| Enzyme | Glucose oxidase | Same |
| Specimen type | Capillary whole blood from fingertip and palm, forearm, upper-arm, calf and thigh | Same |
| Operating conditions | 50°F to 104°F (10°C to 40°C), 10-85% R.H. | Same |
{3}
| HCT range | 20-60% | Same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Detection range | 20-600 mg/dL | Same |
| Measuring time | 7 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Meter size | 71 mm (L) × 60 mm (W) × 19 mm (H) | 100 mm (L) × 56 mm (W) × 23 mm (H) |
| Meter weight | 45 g with battery | 79 g with battery |
| Power battery | 3V CR2032 battery | 1.5 V AAA Alkaline batteries |
| Memory storage | 120 tests | 450 tests |
| Speaking function | No | Yes |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. CLSI - EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
2. IEC - 60601 - 1-2; 2001, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-2: General Requirements for Safety - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility-Requirements and Tests
3. IEC - 61010 - 1; 2010, Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and laboratory use - Part 1: General requirements
4. IEC/EN - 61010-2-101; 2009, Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use- Part2 - 101: Particular requirements for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical equipment
# L. Test Principle:
The test is based on the measurement of electrical current generated by the reaction of capillary whole blood glucose with glucose oxidase on the test strip. The meter measures the strength of the current which is proportional to the concentration of glucose present and displays the corresponding blood glucose level.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The sponsor performed within-run precision studies using venous whole blood samples spiked to five different glucose concentration levels (30 to 50, 51 to 110, 111 to 150, 151 to 250, 251 to $400\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ). Each glucose concentration level was analyzed in replicates of 10, with 3 test strip lots, and 10 meters, for a total of 300 tests per each glucose level for each meter. Results are summarized below:
{4}
5
| Lot 1 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Mean (mg/dL) | n | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| 30 to 50 | 43.1 | 100 | 2.4 | 5.1 |
| 51 to 110 | 78.6 | 100 | 2.7 | 3.4 |
| 111 to 150 | 129.4 | 100 | 3.7 | 2.8 |
| 151 to 250 | 195.4 | 100 | 4.8 | 2.4 |
| 251 to 400 | 327.2 | 100 | 8.9 | 2.7 |
| Lot 2 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Mean (mg/dL) | n | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| 30 to 50 | 43.2 | 100 | 2.4 | 5.6 |
| 51 to 110 | 79.0 | 100 | 2.7 | 3.4 |
| 111 to 150 | 129.5 | 100 | 3.4 | 2.6 |
| 151 to 250 | 194.9 | 100 | 5.0 | 2.6 |
| 251 to 400 | 327.1 | 100 | 8.8 | 2.7 |
| Lot 3 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Mean (mg/dL) | n | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| 30 to 50 | 43.6 | 100 | 2.2 | 5.0 |
| 51 to 110 | 79.0 | 100 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| 111 to 150 | 129.7 | 100 | 3.5 | 2.7 |
| 151 to 250 | 194.7 | 100 | 5.4 | 2.8 |
| 251 to 400 | 328.9 | 100 | 8.8 | 2.7 |
Intermediate (between run) Precision was evaluated using 3 levels of glucose control solutions (30 – 50 mg/dL; 96 – 144 mg/dL and 200 – 300 mg/dL) over 10 days with 3 test strip lots. For each level, on each day, 5 meters were used for testing, with 10 replicates collected per meter for a total of 50 replicates per day for each glucose level.
Precision pooled over 10 days:
| Lot 1 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Mean (mg/dL) | n | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| 30 - 50 | 49.9 | 50 | 2.6 | |
| 96 - 144 | 118.3 | 50 | 3.7 | 3.1% |
| 200 - 300 | 249.8 | 50 | 8.0 | 3.2% |
{5}
| Lot 2 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Mean (mg/dL) | n | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| 30 - 50 | 50.1 | 50 | 2.0 | |
| 96 - 144 | 117.6 | 50 | 3.6 | 3.1% |
| 200 - 300 | 254.1 | 50 | 9.0 | 3.5% |
| Lot 3 | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Mean (mg/dL) | n | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| 30 - 50 | 49.9 | 50 | 2.0 | |
| 96 - 144 | 118.9 | 50 | 3.8 | 3.2% |
| 200 - 300 | 253.2 | 50 | 8.8 | 3.5% |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity testing was performed using venous whole blood samples. The evaluation was conducted with 10 meters and 3 test strip lots. Samples with the following glucose concentrations (mg/dL) were prepared: 20, 50, 90, 150, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 510, and 600.
Low samples were prepared by allowing glycolysis to occur. High samples were prepared by spiking into the venous whole blood samples. Values were confirmed using a laboratory reference method (YSI 2300 analyzer) calibrated with NIST reference material.
Ten strips from each lot were used for testing at each glucose concentration for a total of $n = 30$ tests per glucose concentration. The evaluation yielded the following regression equation based on all samples:
| Lot | Slope | y-intercept | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.9927 | 4.6355 | 0.9978 |
| 2 | 0.9952 | 3.6973 | 0.9973 |
| 3 | 0.9964 | 2.2992 | 0.9982 |
The results of the study support the sponsor's claimed glucose measuring range of $20 - 600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
{6}
7
Traceability:
The system is traceable to the NIST SRM #917c glucose reference material.
Test strips and control solutions were previously cleared in k122338.
Control Solution Value Assignment and Stability:
Value Assignment protocols and acceptance criteria for the 2 levels of control solutions were evaluated and found to be acceptable in k122338. The ranges for each control solution are provided on the test strip vial label. Stability protocols and acceptance criteria for the control solutions were evaluated in k122338 and found to be acceptable to support closed-vial stability of 24 months at 39-86°F and open-vial stability of 90 days when stored at the recommended storage temperature (39-86°F) or until the expiration date printed on the label, whichever comes first.
Test Strip Stability:
Stability protocols and acceptance criteria for the Prodigy No Coding Test Strips were evaluated in k122338 and found to be acceptable to support closed-vial stability of 24 months at 39-104°F and open-vial stability of 90 days when test strips are stored at the recommended storage temperature (39-104°F) and 10-85% relative humidity or until the expiration date printed on the label, whichever comes first. The labeling instructs the users not to freeze the test strips.
d. Detection limit:
See linearity study in Section M1b above. The meter displays "Lo" with glucose values below 20mg/dL, and "HI" with glucose values over 600 mg/dL.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were performed by spiking endogenous and exogenous substances into venous whole blood. Each potential interferent was tested at three glucose levels (approximately 80, 250, and 450 mg/dL). Ten replicates were measured for each test sample. Results of test samples measured on the Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Blood Glucose Meter System were compared to samples measured on a laboratory-based reference method (YSI 2300 analyzer) and bias and percent bias were calculated. This procedure was performed for 3 test strip lots. The compounds at the concentrations listed below did not affect results (defined by the sponsor as percent bias ≤ 10%):
{7}
| Interfering substance | Concentration with no Significant Interference |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 8.0 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic acid | 5.0 mg/dL |
| Aspirin | 60 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 90 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 500 mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 5.0 mg/dL |
| Dopamine | 2.0 mg/dL |
| Galactose | 900 mg/dL |
| Gentisic acid | 5.0 mg/dL |
| Glutathione | 53 mg/dL |
| Hydroxyurea | 3.0 mg/dL |
| L-dopa | 10 mg/dL |
| Maltose | 900 mg/dL |
| Methyldopa | 3.0 mg/dL |
| Tolazamide | 100 mg/dL |
| Tolbutamide | 400 mg/dL |
| Triglyceride | 2,000 mg/dL |
| Uric acid | 8.0 mg/dL |
| Xylose | 100 mg/dL |
Based on these results, the sponsor states the following limitation in their labeling: "The system exhibits interference from Acetaminophen. Do not use during acetaminophen treatment."
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
To assess system accuracy, results from the Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System were compared to a reference method (YSI 2300 analyzer). Venous samples and capillary samples from fingerstick, forearm, palm, upper arm, calf and thigh were obtained by professional users from 100 participants with glucose concentrations ranging from 44-414 mg/dL. To obtain extreme blood glucose concentrations, seven samples were altered. Results of linear regression of the first test from each participant are shown below:
{8}
Linear regression analysis:
Fingertip: $y = 1.0137x - 2.9146R^2 = 0.9883$
Palm: $y = 1.01x - 0.7405R^2 = 0.9883$
Forearm: $y = 0.9963x + 0.4211R^2 = 0.9865$
Upper arm: $y = 1.0095x - 0.8054R^2 = 0.987$
Calf: $y = 1.0076x - 1.5091R^2 = 0.9882$
Thigh: $y = 1.0076x - 1.5091R^2 = 0.9882$
Results are shown in the tables below:
Fingertip
| For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL | |
| 9/15 (60%) | 13/15 (87%) | 15/15 (100%) | |
| For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL | | | |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% ± | Within ± 20% |
| 54/92 (59%) | 79/92 (86%) | 90/92 (98%) | 92/92 (100%) |
Palm
| For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL | |
| 10/15(67%) | 14/15 (93%) | 15/15 (100%) | |
| For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL | | | |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% ± | Within ± 20% |
| 58/92 (63%) | 73/92 (79%) | 88/92 (96%) | 92/92 (100%) |
Forearm
| For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL | |
| 9/15 (60%) | 13/15 (87%) | 15/15 (100%) | |
| For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL | | | |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% ± | Within ± 20% |
| 57/92 (62%) | 80/92 (87%) | 91/92 (99%) | 92/92 (100%) |
Upper arm
| For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL | |
| 9/15 (60%) | 13/15 (87%) | 15/15 (100%) | |
| For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL | | | |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% ± | Within ± 20% |
| 54/92 (59%) | 78/92 (85%) | 89/92 (97%) | 92/92 (100%) |
Calf
| For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| 10/15 (67%) | 13/15 (87%) | 15/15 (100%) |
{9}
10
| For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% ± | Within ± 20% |
| 60/92 (65%) | 83/92 (90%) | 90/92 (98%) | 92/92 (100%) |
Thigh
| For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL | |
| 9/15 (60%) | 13/15 (87%) | 15/15 (100%) | |
| For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL | | | |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% ± | Within 205 % |
| 53/92 (58%) | 80/92 (87%) | 89/92 (97%) | 92/92 (100%) |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
User Performance study:
To assess the performance of the Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System in the hands of the intended users, the sponsor performed a study with 109 lay user participants who collected and tested samples from their own fingertip, palm, forearm, upper arm, calf and thigh. Results were analyzed by comparing blood glucose results obtained by the lay users with the Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System against results obtained using a laboratory reference method (YSI 2300 analyzer). The glucose concentrations in the samples ranged from approximately 55.6 to 330 mg/dL as measured by the laboratory reference method. Results are summarized in the tables below:
For glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL
| Site | Within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Finger | 16/22 (73%) | 22/22 (100%) | 22/22 (100%) |
| Palm | 14/22 (64%) | 21/22 (100%) | 22/22 (100%) |
{10}
| Forearm | 15/22 (73%) | 21/22 (95%) | 22/22 (100%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Upper arm | 16/22 (73%) | 21/22 (95%) | 22/22 (100%) |
| Calf | 19/22 (86%) | 22/22 (100%) | 22/22 (100%) |
| Thigh | 14/22 (64%) | 21/22 (95%) | 22/22 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Site | Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Finger | 44/87 (51%) | 71/87 (82%) | 80/87 (92%) | 87/87(1 00%) |
| Palm | 46/87 (53%) | 71/87 (82%) | 84/87 (97%) | 87/87 (100%) |
| Forearm | 46/87 (73%) | 72/87 (83%) | 82/87 (94%) | 87/87 (100%) |
| Upper arm | 56/87 (64%) | 79/87 (91%) | 87/87 (95%) | 87/87 (100%) |
| Calf | 52/87 (60%) | 70/87 (80%) | 83/87 (95%) | 87/87 (100%) |
| Thigh | 44/87 (51%) | 72/87 (83%) | 84/87 (97%) | 87/87(1 00%) |
Linear Regression Analysis:
| Sample Site | Slope | Intercept | R2 | N | Glucose Concentration range (new meter) (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Fingertip | 0.9915 | 0.0657 | 0.9681 | 109 | 55-392 |
| Palm | 1.0004 | -0.6104 | 0.972 | 109 | 50-357 |
| Forearm | 0.9994 | -0.4764 | 0.9712 | 109 | 52-342 |
| Upper arm | 0.9884 | 1.8124 | 0.9887 | 109 | 52-321 |
| Calf | 1.0031 | -2.3851 | 0.977 | 109 | 53-363 |
| Thigh | 1.0006 | -0.0014 | 0.9762 | 109 | 50-364 |
# 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
# 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor provided the following information for expected glucose values for
{11}
persons without diabetes:
The normal adult fasting blood glucose range for a nondiabetic person is Less than 100 mg/dL (5.55 mmol/L) and less than 140 mg/dL (7.77 mmol/L) up to 2 hours after meals.
Source: American Diabetes Association (September 22, 2014). http://www.diabetes.org/diabetesbasics/diagnosis/)
## N. Instrument Name:
Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System
## O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and requires a sample volume of >0.7 µL.
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
☑ Yes ☐ or No ☐ X
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
☑ Yes ☐ X or No
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The system is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger, palm, forearm, upper arm, calf and thigh. The whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip by capillary action.
5. Calibration:
Calibration is automatic. There is no user input for coding.
6. Quality Control
Two levels of aqueous glucose control solutions are available (sold separately) for use
12
{12}
with this system. Instructions on how to order the control solutions are included in the user manual. The meter has a function for the user to select that they wish to run a control solution to prevent control results from being stored in the internal memory as patient results. Recommendations on when to test the control materials are provided in the labeling. The control solution readings are not included in the average of the patient results when the measurements are performed in the "control solution mode". An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label. The user is cautioned not to use the meter if the control result falls outside these ranges.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
1. Hematocrit Study: To evaluate the effect of hematocrit on the Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System, venous blood samples were adjusted to hematocrit levels of 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 60% and 65%. Each hematocrit level was tested at 5 glucose concentration intervals (30-50, 51-110, 11-150, 151-250, 251-400 mg/dL) for a total of 30 samples. The evaluation included 10 meters, each tested with 2 lots of test strips, with 10 replicates per lot per Hct level per glucose level (for a total of 20 replicates for each sample). Results from the meter were compared to results obtained using a laboratory-based reference measurement (YSI 2300 analyzer). The evaluation of percent bias relative to values obtained on the YSI 2300 analyzer demonstrated acceptable performance across the hematocrit range of 20-60%.
2. Altitude study: To evaluate the effect of altitude on the Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Blood Glucose Monitoring System, meters were tested at 6 altitudes above sea level (298 ft; 2 920 ft; 4,790 ft; 6,234 ft; 8,563 ft and 11,161 ft). Five glucose levels (43, 82,134,203, and 321 mg/dL) were tested at each altitude. The evaluation included three meters and three strip lots. Each lot included 6 replicates for a total of 18 replicates per glucose level/altitude combination. Results were compared to results obtained using a laboratory-based reference measurement (YSI 2300 analyzer) and demonstrated that altitudes up to 11,000 feet above sea level have no significant effect on blood glucose measurements from the Prodigy Auto-Code Eject system.
3. Sample Volume: To demonstrate the minimum sample volume, venous whole blood samples with volumes ranging from 0.5 - 1.5 μL were tested. Sample concentrations included five glucose levels (0, 76.6, 112, 175, and 340 mg/dL) tested at each volume. Testing included 10 strips from each of 3 lots for each glucose concentration/sample volume combination for a total of 30 replicates per volume/glucose level combination. Ten meters were used during testing. Values obtained were compared to values obtained using a laboratory-based reference method (YSI 2300 analyzer). Results support the a minimum sample volume of 0.7 μL.
4. Temperature and humidity studies: To evaluate system performance under the extremes of the recommended temperature and humidity conditions, sample testing was performed at temperatures of 50, 77, and 104 °F, and RH of 10 and 85%; each temperature was tested at both RH conditions. Venous whole blood at glucose concentrations 48, 149, and 315 mg/dL were tested. The evaluation included 10 Prodigy Auto-Code Eject Meters, and 3 strip lots with a total of 30 replicates per glucose level/environmental condition combination. The results obtained on the Prodigy Auto-Code Eject glucose meter were compared to those obtained on the YSI
13
{13}
2300, and support the operating conditions of temperatures from 10-40°C and RH from 10-85% in any combination.
5. Infection Control and Robustness Studies: The device is intended for single-patient use only. Disinfection efficacy testing on the surface materials of the meter demonstrated complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with the chosen disinfectant, PDI SUPER SANI-CLOTH germicidal disposable wipes (EPA Registration # 9480-4). Robustness studies were also performed by the sponsor demonstrating that there was no change in performance or external materials of the meter after 520 cleaning and disinfection cycles (a total of 1040 wipes) designed to simulate 5 years of device use with a maximum frequency of cleaning and disinfection 2x/week.
6. EMC testing was certified (Universal Testing Inc., Taiwan) and compliance certificates were provided.
7. Flesch-Kincaid readability assessment was conducted on all labeling and demonstrated that the User Manual was written at a grade level of 7.8 and the test strip insert was written at a grade level of 7.9.
8. Usability: Users completed questionnaires regarding ease of use (on a scale of 1 (disagree) to 5 (fully agree) as well as specific questions to test understanding of information in the user manual. Greater than 90% of participants agreed that instructions were effective and helpful and results were easy to understand. Participants were also given questions to assess their understanding of the material in the manual. More than 95% of participants scored 85% or higher.
9. The meter manual states that customer service is available (24 hours, 7 days a week) by calling 1-800-243-2636.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
14
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.