The Sensititre HP MIC susceptibility Plate is an in vitro diagnostic product for clinical susceptibility testing of fastidious isolates. This 510(k) is for the newly approved Breakpoints for Telavancin, utilizing the 0.002% Polysorbate 80 for the reference method in the dilution range of 0.0005-2ug/ml to the Sensititre HP MIC Susceptibility plate for testing Streptococcus spp. The approved primary "Indications for Use" and clinical significance for Streptococcus spp. is for the following species: Streptococcus pyogenes Streptococcus agalactiae Streptococcus anginosus
Device Story
Sensititre HP MIC Susceptibility plate is a 96-well microtiter plate pre-dosed with antimicrobial agents; used for in vitro clinical susceptibility testing of fastidious Streptococcus spp. System utilizes growth-based fluorescence technology; bacterial surface enzymes cleave a fluorogenic substrate, releasing a fluorophore. Fluorescence intensity correlates with bacterial growth. Plates are inoculated with standardized organism suspension; incubated 20-24 hours. Results read manually (Vizion) or automatically (ARIS/Autoreader/OptiRead). Healthcare providers use MIC results to guide antimicrobial therapy. System benefits include standardized, automated susceptibility testing for fastidious organisms.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. The submission relies on bench testing to demonstrate substantial equivalence, specifically comparing the performance of the Sensititre HP MIC plate to the reference broth microdilution method for Telavancin susceptibility testing of Streptococcus species.
Technological Characteristics
Microtiter plate-based broth microdilution system. Contains dehydrated antimicrobial agent (Telavancin) and 0.002% Polysorbate 80. Designed for in vitro diagnostic use in clinical laboratories. Standardized for testing fastidious Streptococcus species.
Indications for Use
Indicated for clinical susceptibility testing of fastidious isolates, specifically Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Streptococcus anginosus, to determine susceptibility to Telavancin.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antimicrobial susceptibility test powder is a device that consists of an antimicrobial drug powder packaged in vials in specified amounts and intended for use in clinical laboratories for determining in vitro susceptibility of bacterial pathogens to these therapeutic agents. Test results are used to determine the antimicrobial agent of choice in the treatment of bacterial diseases.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION MEMORANDUM ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K141651
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain a substantial equivalence determination by demonstrating acceptable performance of the Sensititre HP MIC or Breakpoint Susceptibility Test System with the revised CLSI and FDA interpretive criteria (breakpoints) for Telavancin and *Streptococcus* spp., utilizing the 0.002% Polysorbate 80 for the reference method.
C. Measurand:
Telavancin in the dilution range of 0.0005-2 µg/mL
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST), growth based fluorescence.
E. Applicant:
Trek Diagnostic Systems, Inc.,
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Sensititre Susceptibility Plates
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.1640 Antimicrobial Test Powder
2. Classification:
Class II
{1}
2
3. Product code(s):
JWY - Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Systems
LRG - Instrument for Auto Reader & Interpretation of overnight suscept systems
LTT - Panels, Test, Susceptibility, Antimicrobial
LTW - Susceptibility Test Cards, Antimicrobial
4. Panel:
83 - Microbiology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The Sensititre HP MIC Susceptibility plate is an in vitro diagnostic product for clinical susceptibility testing of fastidious isolates.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Sensititre HP MIC Susceptibility plate is an in vitro diagnostic product for clinical susceptibility testing of fastidious isolates.
This 510 (k) is for the newly approved breakpoints for Telavancin, utilizing the 0.002% Polysorbate 80 for the reference method in the dilution range of 0.0005-2μg/mL to the Sensititre HP MIC Susceptibility plate for testing Streptococcus spp.
The approved primary “Indications for Use” and clinical significance for Streptococcus spp. is for the following species:
Streptococcus pyogenes
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus anginosus
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Prescription use only.
The ability of the Sensititre system to detect non-susceptible isolates to Telavancin is unknown because non-susceptible isolates were not available at the time of the comparative testing. If such isolates are observed, they should be submitted to a reference lab.
{2}
4. Special instrument requirements:
The Sensititre Autoinoculator/AIM™, the Sensititre Optiread™/Autoreader, the Sensititre Vizion® and the Sensititre Nephelometer.
I. Device Description:
Each plate is dosed with antimicrobial agents at appropriate dilutions. Results can be read manually by visual reading of growth or automatically on an ARIS®/Autoreader®/OptiRead® using fluorescence. The Sensititre Autoreader/OptiRead® system utilizes fluorescence technology. The technology involves the detection of bacterial growth by monitoring the activity of specific surface enzymes produced by the test organism. Growth is determined by generating a fluorescent product from a non-fluorescent (fluorogenic) substrate. The non-fluorescent substrate is prepared by conjugating a fluorescent compound to the specific enzyme substrates with a bond, which prevents fluorescence. The fluorophore is then said to be quenched. The plates are prepared with the substrate already added to the plate. Enzymatic action of the bacterial surface enzymes on the specific substrates cleaves this bond releasing the fluorophore, which is now capable of fluorescence. The amount of fluorescence detected is directly related to the activity of the bacterial surface enzymes and, therefore, to the bacterial growth.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Sensititre® HP MIC Susceptibility Plate Telavancin 0.001-2 μg/mL and The Sensititre® 18-24 hour MIC Susceptibility System Susceptibility Test Panel for Telavancin 0.03-16 μg/mL
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k093865
3. Comparison with predicate:
Table 1. Similarities and Differences of the Sensititre 20-24 hour and the Predicate
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | The Sensititre MIC or Breakpoint Susceptibility system is an in vitro diagnostic product for clinical susceptibility testing | Same |
| Test Panel | Each 96 well plate is precision dosed with selected | Same |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | antimicrobial agents and substrate for the fluorescent reads, then dried. The bacterial suspension in the appropriate broth is used to rehydrate the plate | |
| | | |
| Instrumentation | Each plate is dosed with antimicrobial agents at appropriate dilutions and inoculated with standardized organism suspension. Results can be read automatically on ARIS®/Autoreader®/OptiRead® using fluorescence or manually on the Vizion or a manual viewer, by visual reading of growth. | Same |
| Reading method | Fluorescence | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Antibiotic/Assay | Telavancin, New Breakpoints: Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae ≤ 0.12 Streptococcus anginosus group ≤ 0.06 | Telavancin, Old Breakpoints K093865: S. aureus ≤1 E. faecalis ≤1 S. pyogenes ≤0.12 S. agalactiae ≤0.12 S. anginosus group ≤0.12 |
| Product Name | Sensititre™ 20-24 hour Susceptibility System Sensititre Haemophilus/Streptococcus pneumoniae (HP) MIC Susceptibility Plates | Sensititre™ 18-24 hour Susceptibility System Sensititre Haemophilus/Streptococcus pneumonia (HP) MIC Susceptibility Plates |
| Test Organism | fastidious gram positive isolates, Streptococcus spp. | Non-fastidious gram positive isolates & fastidious gram positive isolates, Streptococcus spp. |
| Incubation | 20-24 hours for non-fastidious | 18-24 hours for non-fastidious and 20-24 hours for fastidious |
| Reference Method | CLSI (with 0.002% Polysorbate 80) | CLSI (without 0.002% Polysorbate 80) |
| Quality Control organisms and ranges for Telavancin | Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 (0.004-0.015 μg/mL) | Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 (0.004-0.006 μg/mL) |
{4}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | | S. aureus ATCC 29213 (0.12-1 μg/mL)E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (0.12-0.5 μg/mL) |
| Telavancin Dilution range | 0.0005-2 μg/mL | 0.001 to 16 μg/mL
The MIC testing and reporting result range is 0.001-2 μg/mL for Streptococcus spp and 0.03-16 μg/mL for other Gram positive isolates. |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems; Guidance for Industry and FDA
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucmO71462.pdf
2. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, Approved Standard-9th Edition, Document M07-A9
3. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - 24th Informational Supplement, M100-S24.
## L. Test Principle:
Sensititre susceptibility plates are multi-well plastic microtiter plates that contain doubling dilutions of antibacterial agents. Each plate is dosed with antimicrobial agents at appropriate dilutions. Results can be read manually by visual reading of growth or automatically on an Autoreader® using fluorescence. The Sensititre Autoreader system utilizes fluorescence technology which involves the detection of bacterial growth by monitoring the activity of specific surface enzymes produced by the test organism. Growth is determined by generating a fluorescent product from a non-fluorescent (fluorogenic) substrate. The substrate can be added to the inoculum broth and dispensed into the test plates at the same time as the test organism or the plates can be prepared with the substrate already added to the plate. The nonfluorescent substrate is prepared by conjugating a fluorescent compound to the specific enzyme substrates with a bond, which prevents fluorescence (i.e. the fluorophore is quenched in this state). Enzymatic action of the bacterial surface enzymes on the specific substrates cleaves this bond releasing the fluorophore which is now capable of fluorescence. The amount of fluorescence detected is directly related to the activity of the bacterial surface enzymes and, therefore, to bacterial growth.
{5}
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A reproducibility study was conducted at three study sites. Twenty five *Streptococcus* spp were tested at each site (*One S. anginosus*, 11 *S. pyogenes*, 13 *S. agalactiae*) on the Sensititre HP MIC Susceptibility Plates which were read manually and automatically (20-24 hours).
Results were read automatically (using the AutoReader) and manually (using the Vizion).
Reproducibility was calculated as the percent of results for the combined sites which were within +/- one doubling dilution of the mode MIC value for all sites.
For the sake of reproducibility calculations, off-scale values are handled in two ways; "best case" and "worst case" scenarios. Best case calculation for reproducibility assumes the off-scale result is within one well from the mode MIC value. Worst case calculation for reproducibility assuming the off-scale result is greater than one well from the mode MIC value. There were no off-scale results in this study. So, only one value for overall reproducibility is reported for each reading method.
The overall reproducibility was 100% for *Streptococcus* spp read manually (Vizion) and automatically (AutoReader).
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The FDA and CLSI recommended QC isolates were tested on every test occasion with the reference method and the Sensititre HP MIC Susceptibility Plates. The reference method QC results were in range for every day tested. The Sensititre Susceptibility plate was tested a sufficient number of times to demonstrate that the system can produce QC results in the recommended range.
Quality Control was performed at all sites during the studies using both the AutoReader and the manual reading method (Vizion). The mode of the MIC obtained by the Sensititre manual read was similar to that obtained by the AutoReader. Summary of the results are shown in table 2 below.
6
{6}
Table 2. Summary of Quality Control Results for Telavancin for Fastidious Organisms
| ORGANISMS | Telavancin (μg/mL) | Reference | AutoReader | Manual Read |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S. pneumoniae
ATCC 49619
0.004-0.015 μg/mL | 0.002 | | | |
| | 0.004 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| | 0.008 | 45 | 49 | 41 |
| | 0.015 | 10 | 6 | 10 |
| | 0.03 | | | |
Quality Control results for the Sensititre Susceptibility System using either reading methods demonstrated that the system could produce the expected quality control results.
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable
e. Analytical specificity:
Not applicable
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Performance was established through a clinical study which was conducted at three sites. Studies have been conducted with the Sensititre dried susceptibility plates containing Telavancin to test susceptibility of *Streptococcus* spp. (Sensititre *Streptococcus* spp. HP MIC plate). The CLSI microdilution reference methods with 0.002% Polysorbate 80 containing the same antimicrobial in the same dilutions were used for a comparison and evaluation of performance.
The inoculum was prepared using the Sensititre Nephelometer which was calibrated at the start of each test. Plates were inoculated and incubated at 35° C. The reading was done automatically on the AutoReader and manually using the Vizion at 20-24 hours.
{7}
For the manual read, clinical testing was performed on 372 Streptococcus spp (165 Streptococcus pyogenes, 165 Streptococcus agalactiae and 42 Streptococcus anginosus).
For the Auto Read, clinical testing was performed on 371 Streptococcus spp. (164 Streptococcus pyogenes, 165 Streptococcus agalactiae and 42 Streptococcus anginosus). All were freshly collected clinical isolates. In addition, testing was performed on 60 Streptococcus spp. stock challenge isolates (25 Streptococcus pyogenes, 25 Streptococcus agalactiae and 10 Streptococcus anginosus) for both Auto Read and manual Read. The performance evaluations are shown in table 3 and 4 below.
Table 3. Trek Telavancin Summary Table for fastidious organisms (AutoReader)
| | EA TOT | EA N | EA % | Eval EA Tot | Eval EA N | Eval EA % | CA N | CA % | No. NS | min | maj | vmj |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Streptococcus pyogenes | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 164 | 162 | 98.8 | 164 | 162 | 98.8 | 164 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Challenge | 25 | 24 | 96 | 25 | 24 | 96 | 25 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 189 | 186 | 98.4 | 189 | 186 | 98.4 | 189 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Streptococcus agalactiae | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 165 | 164 | 99.4 | 165 | 164 | 99.4 | 164 | 99.4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Challenge | 25 | 24 | 96 | 25 | 24 | 96 | 25 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 190 | 188 | 98.9 | 190 | 188 | 98.9 | 189 | 99.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Streptococcus anginosus grp (S. anginosus, S. intermedius, and S. constellatus) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 42 | 40 | 95.2 | 41 | 40 | 97.6 | 42 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Challenge | 10 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 52 | 50 | 96.2 | 51 | 50 | 98 | 52 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 4. Trek Telavancin Summary Table for fastidious organisms (Manual Read)
| | EA TOT | EA N | EA % | Eval EA Tot | Eval EA N | Eval EA % | CA N | CA % | No. NS | min | maj | vmj |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Streptococcus pyogenes | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 165 | 162 | 98.2 | 165 | 162 | 98.2 | 165 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Challenge | 25 | 25 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 190 | 187 | 98.4 | 190 | 187 | 98.4 | 190 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Streptococcus agalactiae | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 165 | 165 | 100 | 165 | 165 | 100 | 165 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Challenge | 25 | 25 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 190 | 190 | 100 | 190 | 190 | 100 | 190 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Streptococcus anginosus group (S. anginosus, S. intermedius, and S. constellatus) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 42 | 42 | 100 | 42 | 42 | 100 | 42 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Challenge | 10 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 52 | 52 | 100 | 52 | 52 | 100 | 52 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
EA-Essential Agreement
CA-Category Agreement
NS-not susceptible
{8}
Essential agreement (EA) is when the Sensititre panels agree with the reference test panel results exactly or within one doubling dilution of the reference method. Category agreement (CA) is when the Sensititre panel result interpretation agrees exactly with the reference panel result interpretation. Evaluable EA is when the MIC result is on scale for both the Sensititre and the reference and have on-scale EA.
The EA% is acceptable when compared to the reference method as described in the FDA guidance document, "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems; Guidance for Industry and FDA".
Currently, there are no intermediate or resistance interpretive criteria for Telavancin. There were no minor, major or very major errors using the Manual Read Method. However, there was one major error (i.e. susceptible by reference, non-susceptible by the AutoRead) with S. agalactiae. As summarized in table 5 below, the combined (clinical + challenge).
Table 5. Performance of Sensititre Panels read manually on the Vizion and on the AutoReader
| ORGANISMS | Number of isolates tested | % EA | % CA |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Auto Read | | | |
| Streptococcus spp. MHB with LHB | 431 | 98.4 | 99.8 |
| Manual Read Method-Vizion | | | |
| Streptococcus spp. MHB with LHB | 432 | 99.3 | 100 |
EA and CA for all organisms were greater than $90\%$ .
Using the data provided by the sponsor in the diagonal table format recommended in the AST Guidance, an analysis was conducted to check for trending in MIC values.
The trending observed in the overall performance of S. agalactiae demonstrates a statistically significant trend towards higher reading in both manual and auto read compared to the CLSI broth micro-dilution method, which raises concerns for potential major errors as summarized in Table 6 below.
Table 6. MIC Trends for S. agalactiae
| Organism (Reading Method) | # of isolates tested | # on-scale MIC values | % minus two dilution | % minus one dilution | % equal to the reference | % higher one dilution |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S. agalactiae (Auto Read) | 190 | 190 | NA | 18.9 (36/190) | 49.5 (94/190) | 31.6 (60/190) |
| S. agalactiae (Manual Read) | 190 | 190 | NA | 11.1 (21/190) | 41.6 (79/190) | 47.4 (90/190) |
{9}
S. pyogenes and S. anginosus demonstrates a statistically significant trend towards lower reading in the auto read compared to the CLSI broth micro-dilution method, which raises concerns for potential very major error as summarized in Table 7 below.
Table 7. MIC Trends for S. pyogenes and S. anginosus
| Organism (Reading Method) | # of isolates tested | # on-scale MIC values | % minus two dilution | % minus one dilution | % equal to the reference | % higher one dilution |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | | |
| S. pyogenes (Auto Read) | 189 | 189 | NA | 32.8 (62/189) | 50.8 (96/189) | 16.4 (31/189) |
| S. anginosus (AutoRead) | 52 | 51 | 1.9 (1/51) | 43.1 (20/51) | 56.9 (29/51) | 1.9 (1/51) |
To address this trending issue, the sponsor was requested to add the following footnote to the addendum to technical product Information:
"Sensititre HP Telavancin MIC values for fastidious gram positive organisms tended to be one doubling dilution higher in S. agalactiae and one dilution lower in S. pyogenes and S. anginosus compared to reference broth micro-dilution. Streptococcus spp. with an interpretation of non-susceptible for Telavancin is uncommon in most institutions or may result from technical errors. Verify AST if this phenotype has not been previously encountered from this patient or institution".
## Growth Rate:
The growth rate for the manual and automated read methods was greater than 90%; this meets the acceptance criteria of ≤10% non-growth of organisms tested. In the AutoRead method one isolate didn't grow.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not Applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
{10}
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Table 8. Interpretive Criteria and QC Ranges for Telavancin
| Antibiotic/Concentration reviewed | Interpretive Criteria (μg/mL) | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Telavancin 0.0005-2 μg/mL | FDA (S, I, R) | CLSI (S,I,R) | Trek (S, I, R) |
| S. pyogenes | ≤0.12,-,- | ≤0.12,-,- | ≤0.12,-,- |
| S. agalactiae | | | |
| S. anginosus group | ≤0.06,-,- | ≤0.06,-,- | ≤0.06,-,- |
| QC organism | Expected Range | | |
| S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 | 0.004-0.015 | 0.004-0.015 | 0.004-0.015 |
Currently, there are no intermediate or resistance interpretative criteria for Telavancin. The updated pharmaceutical drug label for Telavancin includes interpretive criteria only for susceptible category; therefore, the sponsor was requested to add the following limitation in the Addendum to Technical Product Information:
"The ability of the Sensititre system to detect non-susceptible isolates to Telavancin is unknown because non-susceptible isolates were not available at the time of the comparative testing. If such isolates are observed, they should be submitted to a reference lab".
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.