Retrospective clinical samples were used to validate clinical sensitivity and specificity for SLE and Sjögren's syndrome, and to assess cross-reactivity against various autoimmune and infectious disease conditions.
Clinical Validation Set; Retrospective cohort study
475 characterized patient samples including SLE, Sjögren's syndrome, and various autoimmune/infectious disease controls.; Sample Size: 475
Not applicable for this study
Clinical sensitivity and specificity for SLE and Sjögren's syndrome
Indications for Use
QUANTA Flash Ro60 is a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the semi-quantitative determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum. The presence of anti-Ro60 autoantibodies, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, is an aid in the diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sjögren’s Syndrome. QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrators are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Ro60 Reagents for the determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values. QUANTA Flash Ro60 Controls are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Ro60 Reagents for quality control in the determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum.
Device Story
The QUANTA Flash Ro60 is a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) performed on the BIO-FLASH instrument, a fully automated, closed-system platform. The device uses paramagnetic beads coated with recombinant Ro60 antigen to capture anti-Ro60 IgG antibodies from human serum. After incubation and washing, isoluminol-conjugated anti-human IgG is added. The reaction is triggered by chemical reagents, producing a flash of light (Relative Light Units, RLU) measured by the instrument's luminometer. The RLU signal is proportional to the concentration of anti-Ro60 antibodies. The system uses a lot-specific Master Curve and two calibrators to convert RLU into chemiluminescent units (CU). The device is intended for use in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Results are used by physicians alongside clinical symptoms and other diagnostic tests to support the diagnosis of SLE and Sjögren's Syndrome. The automated process reduces manual handling, improves throughput, and provides standardized, semi-quantitative results compared to traditional ELISA methods.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical validation included 475 samples (SLE n=150, SS n=39, disease controls n=286). Sensitivity for SLE was 24.0% (95% CI: 17.4–31.6%) and for SS was 66.7% (95% CI: 49.8–80.9%). Combined specificity was 97.4% (95% CI: 94.8–99.0%). Method comparison with the predicate (n=63 samples within AMR) showed 88.9% overall agreement (equivocal as negative). Analytical performance included precision (CV ≤10%), linearity (4.9–1374.8 CU), and interference testing.
Technological Characteristics
Semi-quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay; uses paramagnetic microparticles coated with recombinant Ro60 antigen; isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgG conjugate; automated on BIO-FLASH instrument; 4.9–1374.8 CU analytical measuring range; 12-month shelf life at 2–8°C; software-controlled automated processing and calibration.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the semi-quantitative determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren's Syndrome in patients where clinical findings and other laboratory tests are also considered.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antinuclear antibody immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoimmune antibodies in serum, other body fluids, and tissues that react with cellular nuclear constituents (molecules present in the nucleus of a cell, such as ribonucleic acid, deoxyribonucleic acid, or nuclear proteins). The measurements aid in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (a multisystem autoimmune disease in which antibodies attack the victim's own tissues), hepatitis (a liver disease), rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome (arthritis with inflammation of the eye, eyelid, and salivary glands), and systemic sclerosis (chronic hardening and shrinking of many body tissues).
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION MEMORANDUM
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k141328
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
anti-Ro60 IgG autoantibodies
D. Type of Test:
Semi-quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay
E. Applicant:
INOVA Diagnostics, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
QUANTA Flash® Ro60
QUANTA Flash® Ro60 Calibrators
QUANTA Flash® Ro60 Controls
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 866.5100, Antinuclear antibody immunological test system
21 CFR §862.1150, Calibrator
21 CFR §862.1660, Quality Control Material (Assayed and Unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II (assay and calibrators)
{1}
Class I (controls)
3. Product code:
LLL, Extractable antinuclear antibody, antigen and control
JIT, Calibrator, Secondary
JJX, Single (Specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed and Unassayed)
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
QUANTA Flash Ro60 is a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the semi-quantitative determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum. The presence of anti-Ro60 autoantibodies, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, is an aid in the diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sjögren’s Syndrome.
QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrators are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Ro60 Reagents for the determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values.
QUANTA Flash Ro60 Controls are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Ro60 Reagents for quality control in the determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as intended use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
BIO-FLASH Instrument System (k083518)
{2}
I. Device Description:
The QUANTA Flash Ro60 Kit includes the following components:
- One (1) QUANTA Flash Ro60 Reagent Cartridge. The QUANTA Flash Ro60 reagent cartridge contains the following reagents for 50 determinations:
- Ro60 antigen coated paramagnetic beads, lyophilized.
- Assay buffer – colored pink, containing Tris-buffered saline, Tween 20, protein stabilizers and preservatives.
- Tracer IgG – Isoluminol labeled anti-human IgG antibodies in buffer, containing protein stabilizers and preservative.
- One (1) vial of Resuspension buffer
- One (1) Transfer pipette
QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrators include the following components:
- QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrator 1: Two (2) barcode labeled vials containing 0.3 mL prediluted, ready to use reagent. Calibrators contain human antibodies to Ro60 in stabilizers and preservatives.
- QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrator 2: Two (2) barcode labeled tubes containing 0.3 mL prediluted, ready to use reagent. Calibrators contain human antibodies to Ro60 in stabilizers and preservatives.
QUANTA Flash Ro60 Controls include the following components:
- QUANTA Flash Ro60 Negative Control: Two (2) barcode labeled tubes containing 0.5 mL, ready to use reagent. Controls contain human antibodies to Ro60 in stabilizers and preservatives.
- QUANTA Flash Ro60 Positive Control: Two (2) barcode labeled tubes containing 0.5 mL, ready to use reagent. Controls contain human antibodies to Ro60 in stabilizers and preservatives.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
HYCOR AUTOSTAT™ Anti-SS-A Ro ELISA
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k962719
3. Comparison with predicate:
{3}
QUANTA Flash Ro60 Reagent Kit:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
QUANTA Flash Ro60 | Predicate
HYCOR
AUTOSTAT
Anti-SS-A Ro ELISA |
| Intended use | Semi-quantitative
determination of anti-Ro60
IgG autoantibodies in
human serum | Same |
| Assay methodology | Solid phase (heterogeneous)
immunoassay | Same |
| Traceability | International Reference
Preparation is not available;
results are traceable to in-house standards | Same |
| Sample type | Serum | Same |
| Shelf life | 12 months | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
QUANTA Flash Ro60 | Predicate
HYCOR AUTOSTA
Anti-SS-A Ro ELISA |
| Detection/
Operating principle | Chemiluminescent
immunoassay | Enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay |
| Solid phase | Paramagnetic microparticles
(beads) | 96-well plate |
| Antigen | Purified recombinant Ro60
antigen | Native Ro60 antigen,
purified from bovine
sources |
| Conjugate | Isoluminol conjugated anti-human IgG | HRP conjugated anti-human IgG |
| Indications for Use | Includes both SLE and
Sjögren’s syndrome | Sjögren’s syndrome
only |
| Assay format | Automatic | Manual |
| Calibration | Lot specific Master Curve +
two Calibrators (Sold
separately) | Single standard
(Included in the kit) |
{4}
QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrators:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
QUANTA Flash Ro60
Calibrators | Predicate
HYCOR AUTOSTAT
Anti-SS-A Ro ELISA |
| Analyte | Anti-Ro60 antibodies | Same |
| Physico-chemical characteristics | Liquid, prediluted, ready to use | Same |
| Storage | 2–8°C | Same |
| Shelf life | 12 months | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
QUANTA Flash Ro60
Calibrators | Predicate
HYCOR AUTOSTAT
Anti-SS-A Ro ELISA |
| Intended use | QUANTA Flash Ro60
Calibrators are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Ro60 Reagents for the determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum. Each calibrator establishes a point of reference for the working curve that is used to calculate unit values. | No separate intended use; calibrator is part of the kit. |
| Method | QUANTA Flash Ro60
chemiluminescent immunoassay | HYCOR Anti-SS-A/Ro ELISA |
| Unit | CU (Chemiluminescent units) (arbitrary) | U/mL (arbitrary) |
| Matrix | Human serum, stabilizers, and preservative | Human serum with preservative |
QUANTA Flash Ro60 Controls:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
QUANTA Flash Ro60
Controls | Predicate
HYCOR AUTOSTAT
Anti-SS-A Ro ELISA |
| Analyte | Anti-Ro60 antibodies | Same |
| Physico-chemical characteristics | Liquid, ready to use | Same |
| Levels | 2 (negative and positive) | Same |
| Storage | 2–8°C | Same |
| Shelf life | 12 months | Same |
{5}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device
QUANTA Flash Ro60
Controls | Predicate
HYCOR AUTOSTAT
Anti-SS-A Ro ELISA |
| Intended use | QUANTA Flash Ro60
Controls are intended for use with the QUANTA Flash Ro60 Reagents for quality control in the determination of IgG anti-Ro60 autoantibodies in human serum. | No separate intended use; controls are part of the kit. |
| Method | QUANTA Flash Ro60
chemiluminescent immunoassay | HYCOR Anti-SS-A/Ro ELISA |
| Unit | CU (Chemiluminescent units) (arbitrary) | U/mL (arbitrary) |
| Matrix | Human serum, stabilizers, and preservative | Human serum with preservative |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
C28-A3, Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline, Third Addition.
EP05-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP06-A, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement, Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP17-A, Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantification, Approved Guideline.
EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP09-A2IR, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline, Second Edition (Interim Revision) (used for matrix comparison).
Guidance for Industry - Abbreviated 510(k) Submissions for In Vitro Diagnostic Calibrators; Final.
## L. Test Principle:
The QUANTA Flash Ro60 assay is designed to run on the BIO-FLASH® instrument. This
{6}
platform is a fully automated closed system with continuous load and random access capabilities that automatically processes the samples, runs the assay and reports the results. It includes liquid handling hardware, luminometer and computer with software-user interface. The QUANTA Flash Ro60 assay utilizes a reagent cartridge format, which is compatible with the BIO-FLASH instrument.
Purified recombinant Ro60 antigen is coated onto paramagnetic beads. The bead suspension is lyophilized and stored in the bead tube. Prior to use in the BIO-FLASH system, the sealed reagent tubes are pierced with the reagent cartridge lid and the beads are rehydrated and resuspended using resuspension buffer by pipetting up and down with a transfer pipette. The reagent cartridge is then loaded onto the BIO-FLASH instrument. Samples are also loaded onto the instrument in sample racks. A patient serum sample is prediluted by the BIO-FLASH with system rinse in a small disposable plastic cuvette. Small amounts of the diluted patient serum, the beads, and assay buffer are all combined into a second cuvette, and mixed. This cuvette is then incubated at 37°C. The beads are magnetized and washed several times. Isoluminol conjugated anti-human IgG antibodies are then added to the cuvette, and again incubated at 37°C. The beads are magnetized and washed repeatedly. The isoluminol conjugate is oxidized when Trigger 1 and Trigger 2 are added to the cuvette, and the flash of light produced from this reaction is measured as Relative Light Units (RLU) by the BIO-FLASH optical system. The RLU are proportional to the amount of isoluminol conjugate that is bound to the human IgG, which is in turn proportional to the amount of anti-Ro60 antibodies bound to the corresponding Ro60 on the beads.
For quantitation, the QUANTA Flash Ro60 assay utilizes a predefined lot specific Master Curve that is uploaded onto the instrument through the reagent cartridge barcode. Every new lot number of reagent cartridge must be calibrated before first use, with the QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrators. Based on the results obtained with the two Calibrators included in the Calibrator Set (sold separately), an instrument specific Working Curve is created, which is used to calculate chemiluminescent units (CU) from the instrument signal (RLU) obtained for each sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
**Precision:**
The precision of the QUANTA Flash Ro60 assay was evaluated according to CLSI EP5-A2 guideline. Ten (10) samples obtained from a commercial vendor containing various concentrations of Ro60 antibodies were run in duplicate, twice a day, for 21 days for a total of 84 measurements per sample. Two production reagent lots were used in the study. Data were analyzed with the Analyse-it for Excel method evaluation software, and within-run, between-run, between-day and total precision were calculated and summarized in the Table below. No outliers were removed.
7
{7}
Total $\% \mathrm{CV}$ values were within the manufacturer's pre-determined acceptance limit of $\leq 10\%$ .
| Precision Sample | Mean CU | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 110685-1800 | 11.5 | 0.6 | 5.0% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.5 | 4.5% | 0.8 | 6.8% |
| 000674-800 | 16.7 | 0.9 | 5.4% | 0.8 | 4.8% | 0.7 | 4.4% | 1.4 | 8.4% |
| 110688-1000 | 20.7 | 1.4 | 6.9% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.9 | 4.3% | 1.7 | 8.1% |
| 110689-950 | 25.7 | 0.9 | 3.4% | 0.8 | 3.3% | 1.0 | 4.0% | 1.6 | 6.2% |
| 110687-1500 | 26.4 | 0.8 | 3.1% | 0.6 | 2.4% | 0.5 | 1.9% | 1.1 | 4.4% |
| 110687-200 | 142.1 | 7.7 | 5.4% | 4.5 | 3.1% | 6.2 | 4.3% | 10.8 | 7.6% |
| 110688-85 | 406.3 | 26.6 | 6.6% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 21.2 | 5.2% | 34.0 | 8.4% |
| 110684-28 | 807.5 | 25.9 | 3.2% | 20.3 | 2.5% | 18.6 | 2.3% | 37.8 | 4.7% |
| 000674-5.83 | 1181.0 | 45.3 | 3.8% | 49.2 | 4.2% | 30.6 | 2.6% | 73.6 | 6.2% |
| 110686-55 | 1246.3 | 67.9 | 5.4% | 35.3 | 2.8% | 60.8 | 4.9% | 97.7 | 7.8% |
# Repeatability:
Three samples obtained from a commercial vendor were tested on two different reagent lots, using two different lots of calibrators, by two operators. Samples were run in quadruplicate, twice a day, for 10 days, to generate 80 data points per sample. Data were analyzed with the Analyse-it for Excel method evaluation software, and within-run, between-reagent lots, between-calibrator lots, between-operators and total precision were calculated and the results are summarized in the Tables below. All $\% \mathrm{CV}$ values were within the manufacturer's pre-determined acceptance limit of $\leq$ $10\%$ .
| Sample | Mean (CU) | Within Run | | Between Reagent Lots | | Between Calibrator Lots | | Between Operators | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 110685-1800 | 11.5 | 0.6 | 5.0% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.5 | 4.5% | 0.8 | 6.8% | 0.8 | 6.8% |
| 000674-800 | 16.7 | 0.9 | 5.4% | 0.8 | 4.8% | 0.7 | 4.4% | 1.4 | 8.4% | 1.4 | 8.4% |
| 110688-1000 | 20.7 | 1.4 | 6.9% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.9 | 4.3% | 1.7 | 8.1% | 1.7 | 8.1% |
| 110689-950 | 25.7 | 0.9 | 3.4% | 0.8 | 3.3% | 1.0 | 4.0% | 1.6 | 6.2% | 1.6 | 6.2% |
| 110687-1500 | 26.4 | 0.8 | 3.1% | 0.6 | 2.4% | 0.5 | 1.9% | 1.1 | 4.4% | 1.1 | 4.4% |
| 110687-200 | 142.1 | 7.7 | 5.4% | 4.5 | 3.1% | 6.2 | 4.3% | 10.8 | 7.6% | 10.8 | 7.6% |
| 110688-85 | 406.3 | 26.6 | 6.6% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 21.2 | 5.2% | 34.0 | 8.4% | 34.0 | 8.4% |
| 110684-28 | 807.5 | 25.9 | 3.2% | 20.3 | 2.5% | 18.6 | 2.3% | 37.8 | 4.7% | 37.8 | 4.7% |
| 000674-5.83 | 1181.0 | 45.3 | 3.8% | 49.2 | 4.2% | 30.6 | 2.6% | 73.6 | 6.2% | 73.6 | 6.2% |
| 110686-55 | 1246.3 | 67.9 | 5.4% | 35.3 | 2.8% | 60.8 | 4.9% | 97.7 | 7.8% | 97.7 | 7.8% |
{8}
9
| 1 | 11.2 | 0.2 | 1.9% | 0.6 | 5.8% | 0.6 | 5.4% | 0.5 | 4.3% | 0.6 | 5.3% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | 21.0 | 0.5 | 2.5% | 1.6 | 7.4% | 0.8 | 3.9% | 0.7 | 3.1% | 1.1 | 5.4% |
| 3 | 100.0 | 2.7 | 2.7% | 5.0 | 5.0% | 5.3 | 5.3% | 4.2 | 4.2% | 5.1 | 5.1% |
**Lot to Lot:**
A separate lot-to-lot comparison study was performed using 21 samples from INOVA’s serum bank covering the analytical measuring range of the assay and positive and negative controls (23 specimens total). Samples were tested in triplicate with three different reagent lots. All results were within the manufacturer’s pre-defined acceptance criteria.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity of the analytical measuring range (4.9-1374.8 CU) was evaluated by a study according to CLSI EP6-A. Three serum samples with various Ro60 antibody concentrations were diluted in 10% increments (from 0% to 90% diluent) to obtain values that cover the AMR. The dilutions were assayed in duplicate. Percent recovery of obtained results was calculated compared to the expected results (based on the dilution factor). Obtained values were plotted against expected values, and linear regression analysis was performed using Analyse-it software. The slope and intercept of the regression line were calculated with 95% CI as well as the R2 values. All samples met the pre-defined acceptance criteria.
| Sample Pool | Test Range (CU) | Regression equation | Slope (95% CI) | y-Intercept (95% CI) | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 148.3 to 137.2 | y=1.05x+16.23 | 1.05 (1.02 to 1.08) | 16.23 (-9.24 to 41.7) | 1.00 |
| 2 | 15.3 to 178.6 | y=1.00x+0.04 | 1.00 (0.96 to 1.04) | 0.04 (-4.79 to 4.87) | 0.99 |
| 3 | 7.5 to 45.6 | y=1.02x-2.87 | 1.04 (1.00 to 1.08) | -2.87 (-4.11 to -1.63) | 0.99 |
An additional linearity study was performed comparing the results of the assay when diluted with either serum or system rinse over a series of concentrations covering the AMR. The results of the study demonstrated that similar results were obtained from dilution of Ro60 in serum or system rinse.
The AMR is defined by the values of the lowest and highest Master Curve Standards. The QUANTA Flash Ro60 AMR is 4.9 CU to 1374.8 CU.
**Hook effect/Auto-dilution:**
{9}
10
# Auto-dilution:
The BIO-FLASH software has an Auto-rerun option available. If this option is selected, the instrument will automatically rerun any sample that has a result of >1374.8 by further diluting it by 20 fold, thereby bringing the measured value within the AMR. The final result will be calculated by the software by taking into account the additional dilution factor. As the highest value that can be measured is 1374.8 CU, the highest value that can be reported is 27496 CU.
To validate the Auto-rerun function, four high positive specimens with results above the analytical measuring range were selected. The samples were run with the Auto-rerun function enabled on the BIO-FLASH. All samples triggered the auto-rerun function. Then the specimens were manually diluted to the same level as the Auto-rerun function (20 fold) and tested on the BIO-FLASH. The results were within the analytical measuring range after auto-rerun or manual dilution for all specimens. The % recovery values for results obtained with the auto-rerun compared to the results obtained by manual dilution were between 87% and 101% (average 93%) (within the manufacturer's pre-determined ± 20% acceptance limit).
# Hook effect:
To assess hook effect, the measurement signal (relative light units, RLU) was examined for four high positive samples (all results above the AMR) before and after automatic or manual dilution. All sera produced significantly higher RLU values (above the AMR) when used neat. Results were compared to the manually and automatically diluted samples (that were within the AMR), to demonstrate that high positive specimens above the analytical measuring range do not show hook effect up to 19,707 CU in the Ro60 assay.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
# Traceability:
There are currently no recognized international standards for the measurement of anti-Ro60 antibodies. The QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrators and Controls are manufactured by diluting human serum that contains high titer of anti-Ro60 antibodies with commercial antibody stabilizer, containing preservative. The human serum is obtained from commercial sources and it is tested for markers of infectious substances.
The target CU is achieved through trial dilutions on small scale. Once a dilution is selected, the Calibrators and Control are bulked, tested, and adjusted. Upon completion of the manufacturing process, the Calibrators and Controls are tested on at least two instruments, on at least two lots of reagent cartridge, in replicates of 10 to determine final value assignment.
{10}
Expected Values of QUANTA Flash Ro60 Calibrators and Controls:
| Calibrator/Control Reagent | Target Value | Target Range |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ro60 Calibrator 1 | 12 CU | 10 – 14 CU |
| Ro60 Calibrator 2 | 360 CU | 324 – 396 CU |
| Ro60 Negative Control | 10 CU | 8 – 12 CU |
| Ro60 Positive Control | 50 CU | 40 – 60 CU |
**Stability:**
Stability studies have been performed and the results support the following claims:
**Sample Stability:** A sample stability study was conducted using six (two negative, two positive and two around the cut-off) serum samples. All manufacturer pre-determined acceptance criteria were met. Study results supported the following sample stability claims:
- Storage at room temperature, 20–26°C: Samples can be stored at room temperature for up to 48 hours.
- Storage at 2–8°C: Samples can be stored at 2–8°C for up to 14 days.
- Freeze/thaw: Samples should be frozen at -20°C or lower. Samples may be frozen and thawed up to 3 times.
**Shelf-Life/Un-Opened Stability:** Both accelerated and real-time shelf life stability studies were performed for the Ro60 reagent, calibrators and controls. All manufacturer pre-determined acceptance criteria were met. Study results supported the following un-opened stability claims:
- Reagent: The reagent shelf-life stability claim is 12 months at 2–8°C.
- Calibrator and Control: The calibrator and control shelf-life stability claim of 12 months at 2–8°C.
**On-board/Opened/In-Use Stability:** On-board stability studies were performed for the Ro60 reagent, calibrators and controls. All manufacturer pre-determined acceptance criteria were met. Study results supported the following un-opened stability claims:
- Reagent: The Ro60 reagent cartridge is stable for up to 49 days on-board the instrument.
- Calibrator: The Ro60 calibrators are stable for up to 4 calibrations over 8 hour period of on-board instrument use.
- Control: The Ro60 controls are stable for up to 15 uses with an average of time of 10 minutes onboard the instrument per use.
**d. Detection limit:**
{11}
For the Ro60 assay, detection limits were determined according to CLSI EP17-A.
# Limit of Blank (LoB):
LoB was determined using the assay specific sample dilution buffer (System Rinse) as "blank". Four (4) blank samples from two different lots were run in replicates of five, one time per day for three days for a total of 60 measurements per lot. LoB was calculated for each lot separately using the Reference Interval function of Analyse-it software at the $95^{\text{th}}$ percentile, using the non-parametric method.
The resulting analysis provided a $p$ -value indicating non-normal ( $p < 0.0001$ ) distribution of the data points. The resulting LoBs for the two lots were 398 RLU and 452 RLU. The final LoB was determined to be 452 RL.
# Limit of Detection (LoD):
To determine LoD, four low level samples were prepared by diluting anti-Ro60 positive samples. The low level samples were run in replicates of five on two reagent lots, one time per day for three days resulting in 60 measurements per lot. LoD was calculated based on formula that is published in the CLSI Guideline EP17-A: $\mathrm{LoD} = \mathrm{LoB} + (\mathrm{c}\beta^{*}\mathrm{SDS})$ . The LoD was determined separately for each lot and was 519 RLU and 502 RLU. The final LoD for the QUANTA Flash Ro60 assay is 519 RLU, which is below the analytical measuring range of the assay e.g. $< 4.9$ CU.
# e. Analytical specificity:
# Interference:
The interference study was performed according to CLSI EP07-A2. Three specimens were tested (near-the cut-off negative: 15.2 CU; weak positive: 40.3 CU; high positive: 161.4 CU).
Each interfering substance was tested at three concentrations (low, medium, and high) in three different specimens (15.2, 40.3, and 161.4 CU). The resulting samples were assessed in triplicate with the Ro60 assay. Recovery of the unit values was calculated compared to control samples spiked with the same volume of diluent (10% of total).
No interference $(\leq \pm 15\%)$ was detected up to the following concentrations tested:
| Substance | Concentration | % recoveries |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Triglyceride | 1000 mg/dL | 89% to 109% |
| Cholesterol | 224.3 mg/dL | 89% to 109% |
| Bilirubin | 10 mg/dL | 99% to 109% |
| Hemoglobin | 200 mg/dL | 100% to 108% |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 500 IU/mL | 90% to 107% |
{12}
# Cross reactivity:
Cross reactivity was investigated using international reference sera from the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). All 12 sera were tested. The CDC ANA reference sera #2 (reference serum for human antibodies to SS-B/La), #3 (reference serum, fluorescence antinuclear antibody, speckled pattern) and #7 (reference serum for human antibodies to SS-A/Ro) were positive for Ro60 by this assay and produced the following results: CDC ANA #2: $>1374.8$ CU; CDC ANA #3: 920.0 CU and CDC ANA #7 $>1374.8$ CU. The other 9 reference sera in the panel were analyzed and found to be negative for Ro60 by this assay.
# f. Assay cut-off:
The QUANTA Flash Ro60 cut-off was established using unaltered samples in the same matrix (serum) from 156 subjects indicated in the table below:
| Diagnosis | # |
| --- | --- |
| Apparently healthy blood donors | 115 |
| Viral hepatitis positive samples | 8 |
| Syphilis positive samples | 5 |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 23 |
| HIV positive samples | 5 |
The cut-off was established in accordance to CLSI C28-A3c. The distribution of the results was non-normal (Shapiro-Wilk $p < 0.0001$ ), so the non-parametric percentile method was used. The $99^{\text{th}}$ percentile of the obtained values calculated as 8193.6 RLU.
Additionally, 12 proficiency testing samples from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UKNEQAS) with known consensus/target results were tested to aid in the determination of the cut-off. Taking into account the target results of the proficiency testing samples, the cut-off was increased to 12,000 RLU to ensure optimal differentiation between negatives and positives, and a 20 CU value was assigned to this RLU value. No reference sample (156 serum and 12 proficiency) tested positive at this cut-off level.
| | Positive | Negative |
| --- | --- | --- |
| QUANTA Flash Ro60 | ≥ 20 CU | < 20 CU |
{13}
14
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The QUANTA Flash Ro60 assay was compared with the predicate using available samples from the clinical validation set presented below. Because many were outside the measuring range of the assay, only results within the analytical measuring range of the assay are presented. The 143 sample cohort consisted of SLE (n=27), Sjogren’s Syndrome (SS; n=19), and relevant disease controls (n=97).
The predicate has an equivocal region, so the data were analyzed with the equivocal results as either positive or negative. Of the 143 available samples, 63 were within the AMR. These samples contained 25 SLE, 18 SS, and 20 disease controls.
| ELISA equivocal
as negative | Predicate Ro60 ELISA | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| QUANTA Flash
Ro60 CIA | Positive | 40 | 4 | 44 |
| | Negative | 3 | 16 | 19 |
| | Total | 43 | 20 | 63 |
Positive Agreement = 93.0% (40/43) (95% CI: 80.9 – 98.5%)
Negative Agreement = 80.0% (16/20) (95% CI: 56.3 – 94.4%)
Overall Agreement = 88.9% (56/63) (95% CI: 78.5 – 95.4%)
| ELISA equivocal
as positive | Predicate Ro60 ELISA | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| QUANTA Flash
Ro60 CIA | Positive | 40 | 4 | 44 |
| | Negative | 6 | 13 | 19 |
| | Total | 46 | 17 | 63 |
Positive Agreement = 87.0% (40/46) (95% CI: 73.7 – 95.1%)
Negative Agreement = 76.5% (13/17) (95% CI: 50.1 – 93.2%)
Overall Agreement = 84.1% (56/63) (95% CI: 72.7 – 92.1%)
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity:
A total of 475 samples were included in the clinical validation study for the QUANTA Flash Ro60 as shown in the table below:
{14}
| Patient group | N | Number positive | % positive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Graves’ Disease | 10 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hashimoto Thyroiditis | 10 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Celiac Disease | 11 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Crohn’s Disease | 20 | 1 | 5.0% |
| Ulcerative Colitis | 20 | 0 | 0.0% |
| HCV | 9 | 0 | 0.0% |
| HBV | 9 | 0 | 0.0% |
| HIV | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Syphilis | 10 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Osteoarthritis | 20 | 1 | 5.0% |
| Primary Anti-phospholipid Syndrome (PAPS) | 15 | 1 | 6.7% |
| Secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (SAPS)* | 15 | 4 | 26.7% |
| Other rheumatic diseases | 38 | 1 | 2.6% |
| Vasculitis | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Systemic sclerosis | 48 | 1 | 2.1% |
| Autoimmune myositis | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 20 | 1 | 5.0% |
| Autoimmune liver disease** | 24 | 1 | 4.2% |
| Sjögren’s Syndrome (SS) | 39 | 26 | 66.7% |
| Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) | 150 | 36 | 24.0% |
| Total | 475 | | |
* Patients may have SLE
** Samples contain autoimmune liver disease specific antibodies (SLA, F-actin, M2)
All samples were run on the QUANTA Flash Ro60 CIA. The results were analyzed to calculate sensitivity and specificity for SLE $(n = 150)$ and SS $(n = 39)$ together and separately. The SAPS $(n = 15)$ group was excluded from all calculations because the samples might have SLE.
| SLE + SS Clinical Analysis | SLE and SS Clinical Diagnosis | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| QUANTA Flash Ro60 | Positive | 62 | 7 | 69 |
| | Negative | 127 | 264 | 391 |
| | Total | 189 | 271 | 460 |
QUANTA Flash® Ro60 Sensitivity = 32.8% (62/189) (95% CI: 26.2 - 40.0%)
QUANTA Flash® Ro60 Specificity = 97.4% (264/271) (95% CI: 94.8 - 99.0%)
{15}
| SLE Clinical Analysis | SLE Clinical Diagnosis | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| QUANTA Flash Ro60 | Positive | 36 | 7 | 43 |
| | Negative | 114 | 264 | 378 |
| | Total | 150 | 271 | 421 |
QUANTA Flash® Ro60 Sensitivity = 24.0% (36/150) (95% CI: 17.4 – 31.6%)
QUANTA Flash® Ro60 Specificity = 97.4% (264/271) (95% CI: 94.8 – 99.0%)
| SS Clinical Analysis | SS Clinical Diagnosis | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| QUANTA Flash® Ro60 | Positive | 26 | 7 | 33 |
| | Negative | 13 | 264 | 277 |
| | Total | 39 | 271 | 310 |
QUANTA Flash® Ro60 Sensitivity = 66.7% (26/39) (95% CI: 49.8 – 80.9%)
QUANTA Flash® Ro60 Specificity = 97.4% (264/271) (95% CI: 94.8 – 99.0%)
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. is not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
See assay cut-off.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The expected value in the normal population is "negative". Anti-Ro60 autoantibody levels were analyzed in a cohort of 98 apparently healthy blood donors (52 females and 46 males, ages 17 to 60 years, with an average age of 33.2 years and median age of 29 years) using the QUANTA Flash Ro60. This patient population was different from the one that was used to establish the cut-off, and was only used to assess expected values. At the cut-off of 20 CU, 2 (2 %) of the samples were positive on the QUANTA Flash Ro60. The mean concentration was 6 CU, and the values ranged from <4.9 to 84.8 CU.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.