The Composite Brackets are intended for use as a clear, plastic bracket system to provide orthodontic movement of natural teeth.
Device Story
Composite Brackets are clear, polycarbonate orthodontic brackets used to correct mal-alignments in patients with permanent or mixed dentition. Brackets are bonded to teeth by dental professionals using traditional direct or indirect bonding techniques. The system includes brackets with or without metal archwire slots, and optional accessories like hooks for elastics or auxiliary tubes. Brackets apply incremental, progressive force via orthodontic archwires to reposition teeth. Used in clinical settings by dental practitioners; removal follows standard orthodontic procedures. Benefits include aesthetic, clear appearance during treatment.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993-5 (in vitro mammalian cell culture) showed no evidence of cell lysis or toxicity (grade < 2). Oral mucosal irritation testing per ISO 10993-10 in hamsters confirmed the device is a non-irritant. Performance characteristics including shear bond and compressive strength were compared to predicates.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Polycarbonate. Form factor: Clear, plastic brackets with optional metal-reinforced slots. Manufacturing: Molded, thermo-formed. Application: Bonded to teeth using orthodontic adhesives. Features: Mechanical retention base; non-toxic ink for identification. No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for orthodontic movement of natural teeth in patients with permanent dentition (second molars) or mixed dentition to correct minor to complicated mal-alignments.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.
CDB Reflections Composite Bracket System (K973776)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of three faces in profile, stacked on top of each other. The faces are facing to the right. The logo is surrounded by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" in a circular arrangement.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
November 12,2014
Ortho Specialties, Incorporated C/O Ms. Paula Wendland Regulatory Affairs Consultant 207 Pheasant Meadow Court Gurnee, IL 60031
Re: K140807
Trade/Device Name: Composite Brackets Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic Plastic Bracket Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DYW Dated: September 22, 2014 Received: October 1, 2014
Dear Ms. Wendland:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Wendland
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Susan Runno DDS, MA
Erin I. Keith, M.S. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image contains a logo for "Ortho Specialties". The logo features the letters "OS" in a stylized font, with horizontal lines running through them. To the right of the letters, the words "ORTHO" and "SPECIALTIES" are stacked on top of each other in a bold, sans-serif font.
### SECTION 6.0 INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): _ K140807
Device Name:
Indications for Use:
The Composite Brackets are intended for use as a clear, plastic bracket system to provide orthodontic movement of natural teeth.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
Page 19 of 32
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image is a logo for "Ortho Specialties". The logo features the letters "OS" in a stylized font, with horizontal blue lines running through them. To the right of the letters, the words "Ortho Specialties" are written in a simple, sans-serif font, also in blue. A thin blue line runs along the bottom of the logo.
#### Section 5.0 510 (k) Summary
Note: This summary is provided in accordance with 21CFR807.92(c).
| 510(k) Owners Name: | Ortho Specialties, Inc.<br>Tim Allesee, President/Owner |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 3820 Ohio Ave. Suite 15<br>Saint Charles, IL 60174 USA |
| Contact Phone Number: | 224-420-0125 |
| Fax Number: | 630-443-0224 |
| Contact Person: | Paula Wendland, Regulatory Affairs Consultant (Preparer) |
Date 510(k) Summary was Prepared: March 22, 2014
Medical Device Name:
- Trade name Composite Brackets .
- Common name Plastic Orthodontic Brackets .
- Classification name -orthodontic plastic bracket (21CFR872.5470, Product . Code DYW, Class II Device)
# LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICES TO WHICH EQUIVALENCE IS CLAIMED (PREDICATE DEVICE) [807.92(a) (3)]:
- Elation MB TM by Dentsply/GAC, Inc. K092030 ●
- CDB Reflections Composite Bracket System, K973776 .
Page 12 of 104
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for "Ortho Specialties". The logo consists of the letters "OS" stacked on top of each other on the left side of the image. The letters are made up of horizontal blue lines. To the right of the letters is the text "Ortho Specialties" in blue font.
# 5.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICANTS DEVICE:
Composite brackets provide a clear, aesthetic option for patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. The Composite Bracket system is designed to provide simple, aesthetic bonded brackets to correct minor to complicated mal-alignments in patients with permanent dentition (second molars) or mixed dentition using current orthodontic diagnosing techniques with orthodontic arch wires. The system consists of a series of clear, plastic brackets that conform to each tooth and its anatomy and adheres with a bracket base bearing a mechanical retention surface. They are provided with or without a metal archwire slot. Additional accessories to the brackets, depending on the dental professionals' technique, mav include small hooks for the use of elastics and auxiliary arch wire tubes. Each bracket applies incremental, progressive force to reposition teeth to achieve ideal alignment, as prescribed by the treating dental practitioner. The composite brackets are bonded to the patient's teeth by traditional orthodontic direct and indirect bonding techniques using Orthodontic adhesives. These techniques are understood and documented in formal, orthodontic literature.
Removal method of the composite brackets at the conclusion of treatment is consistent with standard bracket removal methods reported in orthodontic literature and require no additional instructions. The removal method is identical to those required for the predicate device.
The Composite Brackets will be marketed in bulk (for up to 5 full arches) using a circular tray dispenser with identification key for each bracket type and tooth position. The Composite brackets are also available in a clear, plastic tray for a single patient arch.
#### 5.2 INTENDED USE AND POPULATION:
The Composite Brackets are intended for use as a clear, plastic bracket system to provide orthodontic movement of natural teeth.
#### 5.3 PREDICATE DEVICE:
Dentsply Elation MB bracket system, 510(k) submission (K092030) dated 7/24/2009 is similar in intended use and compositional technology compared to the Composite Brackets described in this submission for brackets with metal reinforced slots.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Ortho Specialties. The logo consists of the letters "OS" in a stylized font, with the letters made up of horizontal blue lines. To the right of the letters, the words "ORTHO SPECIALTIES" are written in blue, with "ORTHO" on top of "SPECIALTIES". A blue line is present at the bottom of the logo.
CDB Reflections Composite bracket system, 510(k) submission (K973776), dated 11/21/1997 is similar in intended use compared to Composite Brackets described in this submission for brackets that do not contain metal reinforced slots.
# 5.4 TECHNOLOGICAL AND PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS:
Performance Characteristics of COMPOSITE BRACKETS versus GAC Elation MB and CDB Reflections:
| Property | Composite<br>Brackets | GAC Elation MB | CDB Reflections |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Plastic, Orthodontic<br>Bracket with or<br>without metal<br>reinforced slots for<br>alignment of teeth | Plastic, Orthodontic<br>Bracket with metal<br>reinforced slots for<br>alignment of teeth | Plastic, Orthodontic<br>Bracket without<br>metal reinforced<br>slots for alignment<br>of teeth |
| Composition | Polycarbonate | Polycarbonate | Polycarbonate |
| Aesthetic<br>Features | Clear (translucent)<br>bracket system | Clear (translucent)<br>Bracket System with<br>reinforced metal<br>slots | Clear (translucent)<br>bracket system |
| Mode of Use | Archwire<br>implementation by<br>dental<br>professional's<br>technique | Archwire<br>implementation by<br>dental professional's<br>technique | Archwire<br>implementation by<br>dental professional's<br>technique |
| Physical<br>Properties | Mechanical<br>Retention base<br>eliminating need<br>for plastic<br>condition pre-<br>treatment<br>Non-Toxic ink on<br>brackets for<br>identification | Mechanical<br>Retention base<br>eliminating need for<br>plastic condition pre-<br>treatment<br>Non-Toxic ink on<br>brackets for<br>identification | Base requires Plastic<br>Conditioner prior to<br>bonding with an<br>orthodontic adhesive.<br>Non-Toxic ink on<br>brackets for<br>identification |
| Application | Bonded | Bonded | Bonded |
| Manufacturing<br>Method | Molded, thermo-<br>formed | Molded, thermo-<br>formed | Molded, thermo-<br>formed |
Page 14 of 104
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for "Ortho Specialties". The logo consists of the letters "OS" stacked on top of each other, with the "O" on top and the "S" on the bottom. The letters are made up of horizontal blue stripes. To the right of the letters is the text "ORTHO SPECIALTIES" in blue, with "ORTHO" on top and "SPECIALTIES" on the bottom.
### 5.5 Summary:
Composite Brackets of thermoplastic polycarbonate composition have been well documented in literature (Pithon M., Lacerda dos Santos R., Martins F., Ruellas A., Nojima L., Nojima M., Romanos, M. (2009) Cytotoxicity of Polycarbonate Orthodontic Brackets, Brazilian Journal of Oral Science, April/June 2009 -Volume 8, Number 2).
Cytotoxicity testing was conducted using the ISO 10993-5 Elution Method. The Composite Orthodontic Brackets were evaluated for potential cytotoxic effects using an in vitro mammalian cell culture test following the guidelines of ISO10993-5, Biological evaluation of medical device - Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. The Composite Orthodontic Brackets showed no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity and met the requirements of the test with a grade of less than grade 2 (Mild reactivity).
Oral Mucosal irritation testing was conducted using ISO 10993-10, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization. The Composite Orthodontic Brackets were evaluated for potential to cause oral mucosal irritation in hamsters. The Composite Orthodontic Brackets were considered a nonirritant to the oral mucosa of the hamster.
Based on characteristics of intended use, application, composition, aesthetics and physical property testing showing similar shear bond and compressive strength, the Composite brackets are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices (Dentsply Elation MB and CDB Reflections Composite bracket systems).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.