K140665 · Genprime, Inc. · DIS · Dec 8, 2014 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
K140665
Device Name
GenPrime Snap-Top Split Key Cup
Applicant
Genprime, Inc.
Product Code
DIS · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
Dec 8, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3150
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Software as a Medical Device, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K140665 · Dec 8, 2014
GenPrime Snap-Top Split Key Cup
Genprime, Inc.
Clinical urine samples from laboratory, workplace, and point-of-care (POC) settings
Clinical urine samples were used to evaluate the accuracy of the Snap-Top Split Key Cup by comparing results against GC/MS or LC/MS/MS reference methods.
The Snap-Top Split Key Cup for use with the GenPrime Drugs of Abuse (DOA) Reader System is for in vitro diagnostic use and is intended for prescription use in laboratories, point-of-care, and workplaces by trained users. The test is not intended for over-the-counter use. The test cannot be read visually and must be used with the GenPrime DOA Reader. The Snap-Top Split Key Cup qualitatively detects drug classes in human urine at the cut-off concentrations shown below: Amphetamines (d-Amphetamine, 500 ng/mL), Barbiturates (Secobarbital, 300 ng/mL), Benzodiazepines (Oxazepam, 300 ng/mL), Cocaine (Benzoylecgonine, 150 ng/mL), Methamphetamine (d-Methamphetamine, 500 ng/mL), Methadone (Methadone, 300 ng/mL), Morphine (Morphine, 300 ng/mL), Opiates 2000 (Morphine, 2000 ng/mL), Oxycodone (Oxycodone, 100 ng/mL), Phencyclidine (Phencyclidine, 25 ng/mL), Marijuana (Delta-9-THC-COOH, 50 ng/mL). Configurations of the Snap-Top Split Key cup may consist of any combination of the above listed drug analytes. The Snap-Top Split Key Cup provides only a preliminary analytical result. A more specific alternate chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or liquid chromatography / tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) are the preferred confirmatory methods. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary positive results are obtained.
Device Story
Snap-Top Split Key Cup; single-use, disposable immunochromatographic test; detects drugs of abuse in human urine. Device features test card with drug strips integrated into urine cup; requires key activation to disperse urine. Used exclusively with GenPrime DOA Reader. Reader captures image of test strips; software algorithm analyzes density of visible lines against background to determine preliminary positive/negative results; verifies control lines. Used in labs, point-of-care, and workplaces by trained personnel. Provides preliminary results; requires confirmation via GC/MS, HPLC, or LC/MS/MS. Clinical judgment required for interpretation. Benefits include rapid, automated, objective screening for drug classes.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical accuracy evaluated at three sites (lab, workplace, POC) using blind-coded clinical urine samples (min 40 positive/40 negative per drug). Comparison against GC/MS or LC/MS/MS. Results showed high agreement: BAR (96.0-100%), BZO (95.2-100%), COC (100%). Combined drug agreement: 100% for positive samples (95% CI 96.9-100) and 97.0% for negative samples (95% CI 92.5-98.8).
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay. Components: mouse monoclonal anti-drug antibodies conjugated with colloidal gold, rabbit IgG conjugated with colloidal gold, nitrocellulose membrane with drug-protein conjugate test lines and goat anti-rabbit IgG control lines. Single-use disposable cup with key-activated partition. Software-based image analysis of line density. Sterilization not specified. Standards: ISO 14971, IEC 62304, AAMI/ANSI/IEC 60601-1-2, UL 60950-1, CLSI EP12-A2.
Indications for Use
Indicated for prescription use in laboratories, point-of-care, and workplaces by trained users for the qualitative detection of drug classes in human urine. Not for over-the-counter use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A barbiturate test system is a device intended to measure barbiturates, a class of hypnotic and sedative drugs, in serum, urine, and gastric contents. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of barbiturate use or overdose and in monitoring levels of barbiturate to ensure appropriate therapy.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A barbiturate test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
Predicate Devices
Profile-V MEDTOXScan Drugs of Abuse Test System (k080635)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k140655
B. Purpose for Submission:
Addition of Barbiturates, Benzodiazepine, and Cocaine analytes to the Split Key Cup component of a previously cleared device system (k130082).
C. Measurand:
Barbiturates, Benzodiazepine, Cocaine
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative immunochromatographic assay
E. Applicant:
GenPrime Incorporated
F. Proprietary and Established Names
Snap-Top Split Key Cup for use with the GenPrime Drugs of Abuse (DOA) Reader System
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product | Classificatie | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DIS | Class II | 21 CFR 862.3150 Barbiturate test system | 91 (Toxicology) |
| JXM | Class II | 21 CFR 862.3170 Benzodiazepine test system | 91 (Toxicology) |
| DIO | Class II | 21 CFR 862.3250 Cocaine and cocaine metabolite test system | 91 (Toxicology) |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended Use(s):
See Indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Snap-Top Split Key Cup for use with the GenPrime Drugs of Abuse (DOA) Reader System is for in vitro diagnostic use and is intended for prescription use in laboratories, point-of-care, and workplaces by trained users. The test is not intended for over-the-counter use. The test cannot be read visually and must be used with the GenPrime DOA Reader. The Snap-Top Split Key Cup qualitatively detects drug classes in human urine at the cut-off concentrations shown below:
| Test | Calibrated to | Cut-off |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Amphetamines | d-Amphetamine | 500 ng/mL |
| Barbiturates | Secobarbital | 300 ng/mL |
| Benzodiazepines | Oxazepam | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine | Benzoylecgonine | 150 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine | d-Methamphetamine | 500 ng/mL |
| Methadone | Methadone | 300 ng/mL |
| Morphine | Morphine | 300 ng/mL |
| Opiates 2000 | Morphine | 2000 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone | Oxycodone | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine | Phencyclidine | 25 ng/mL |
| Marijuana | Delta-9-THC-COOH | 50 ng/mL |
Configurations of the Snap-Top Split Key cup may consist of any combination of the above listed drug analytes.
The Snap-Top Split Key Cup provides only a preliminary analytical result. A more specific alternate chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or liquid chromatography / tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) are the preferred confirmatory methods. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary positive results are obtained.
{2}
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For in vitro diagnostic prescription use in laboratories, point-of-care, and workplace sites
4. Special instrument requirements:
The GenPrime DOA Reader
I. Device Description:
The Snap-Top Split Key Cup (Snap-Top SK Cup) is a rapid, single use, disposable immunochromatographic test for the qualitative detection of drugs of abuse in human urine. The device consists of a test card with drug strips integrated into a urine cup with a partition that requires a key activation step to disperse urine into the cup for testing to begin. The Snap-Top Split Key Cup is intended for use solely with the GenPrime Drugs of Abuse Reader System.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device names(s)
Profile-V MEDTOXScan Drugs of Abuse Test System
2. Predicate K number(s):
k080635
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device | Predicate (k080635) |
| Intended Use | Same | Qualitative and preliminary detection of drugs in human urine using an instrument reader |
| Methodology | Same | Lateral flow immunochromatographic |
| Type of assay | Same | Qualitative |
| Cutoff Values for Cocaine(COC) | Same | COC = 150 ng |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate | Predicate |
| Detection Method | Measures density of visible lines against background on single-use test device | Measures reflectance of visible lines on single use test cassette |
| Cutoff Values for Barbiturates(BAR)and Benzodiazepine (BZO) | BAR = 300 ng
BZO = 300 ng | BAR = 200 ng
BZO = 150 ng |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- ISO 14971:2007 Second Addition: Medical devices-Application of risk management to medical devices
- IEC 62304 First edition 2006-05, Medical device software - Software life cycle processes
- AAMI/ANSI/IEC 60601-1-2:2007, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and Tests
- UL 60950-1, $1^{\text{st}}$ Edition, 2006-07-07 Information Technology Equipment - Safety - Part 1: General Requirements
- CLSI EP12-A2, User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance
# L. Test Principle:
The Snap-Top SK Cup measures density of visible lines against background to produce a preliminary positive or negative result for single-use, immunochromatographic drug tests. Each drug strip of the cup consists of: (1) a purple colored pad containing mouse monoclonal anti-drug antibodies conjugated with colloidal gold and rabbit IgG antibodies conjugated with colloidal gold that are hydrated and solubilized by urine samples for transport through the test strip, and (2) a nitrocellulose membrane strip containing Test lines and a Control line. The Test line is coated with drug-protein conjugate and the Control line is coated with goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies. During analysis, an image of the drug test strip is captured and the software algorithm determines from the image whether the presence or absence of colored test lines is associated with a preliminary positive or negative result for each analyte. The software also confirms the validity of the results by verifying the presence of control lines.
{4}
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
The performance testing described herein is for the BAR, BZO and COC analytes only. The analytes amphetamine, methadone, methamphetamine, morphine, opiate, phencyclidine (PCP) and cannabinoid were previously cleared under k130082 and the performance of those analytes is described in k130082.
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The precision studies were performed with the Snap-Top SK Cup at three sites representative of laboratory, workplace, and POC settings with an intended use operator at each site. The operators performed the tests following the instructions for use.
Precision studies were performed with the target analytes at 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 125%, 150%, 175%, and 200% of the cutoff during a 20 working day period using solutions containing drug concentrations confirmed by GC/MS. The identity of the samples was masked from the operator.
Performance was evaluated for each drug analyte by testing each drug at the stated concentration using a minimum of 15 tests per operator. Results for all sites are shown in the tables below. Note that for the Barbiturates analyte, testing was not performed at the 200% cut-off level for Lot 2 due to a test device shipping error. Information is provided for this analyte at this cut-off level for the other two device lots evaluated.
Barbiturates
| ALL LOTS COMBINED | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 46 | 46 | 0 | 100% |
| 75% | 225 | 45 | 39 | 6 | 86.7% |
| 125% | 375 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 150% | 450 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 200% | 600 | 46 | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| LOT 1 | | | | | |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
{5}
6
| 75% | 225 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 125% | 375 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 150% | 450 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 200% | 600 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
<h2>LOT 2</h2>
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NEG | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100% |
| 75% | 225 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 66.7% |
| 125% | 375 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 100% |
| 150% | 450 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 100% |
<h2>LOT 3</h2>
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NEG | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 75% | 225 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% |
| 125% | 375 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 150% | 450 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 200% | 600 | 31 | 0 | 31 | 100% |
## Benzodiazepines
| ALL LOTS COMBINED | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 50 | 48 | 2 | 96.0% |
| 75% | 225 | 50 | 29 | 21 | 58.0% |
| 125% | 375 | 50 | 2 | 48 | 96.0% |
| 150% | 450 | 49 | 0 | 49 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 49 | 0 | 49 | 100% |
| 200% | 600 | 49 | 0 | 49 | 100% |
<h2>LOT 1</h2>
{6}
7
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NEG | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% |
| 75% | 225 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% |
| 125% | 375 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 150% | 450 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 200% | 600 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| LOT 2 | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 75% | 225 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% |
| 125% | 375 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 150% | 450 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 200% | 600 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| LOT 3 | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 95.0% |
| 75% | 225 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40.0% |
| 125% | 375 | 20 | 2 | 18 | 90.0% |
| 150% | 450 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| 200% | 600 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 100% |
## Cocaine
| ALL LOTS COMBINED | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 75 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 150 | 46 | 46 | 0 | 100% |
| 75% | 225 | 45 | 28 | 17 | 62.2% |
{7}
| 125% | 375 | 45 | 1 | 44 | 97.8% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 150% | 450 | 46 | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| 175% | 525 | 46 | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| 200% | 600 | 47 | 0 | 47 | 100% |
| LOT 1 | | | | | |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 37.5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 75% | 112.5 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 66.7% |
| 125% | 187.5 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 150% | 225 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 175% | 262.5 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 200% | 300 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| LOT 2 | | | | | |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 37.5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 75% | 112.5 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 125% | 187.5 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 100% |
| 150% | 225 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 175% | 262.5 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 200% | 300 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 100% |
| LOT 3 | | | | | |
| % of Cutoff | ng/mL | N | #NEG | #POS | Precision |
| NEG | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 25% | 37.5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
| 50% | 75 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100% |
| 75% | 112.5 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% |
| 125% | 187.5 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 150% | 225 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 175% | 262.5 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 200% | 300 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 100% |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable; the device is intended for qualitative use.
{8}
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
External control standards are not supplied with this device. The sponsor states that specific external quality control products must be used with the device system. The quality control products were previously cleared under k121122.
Stability:
The sponsor’s stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found acceptable. The information supports that the Snap-Top SK Cup unopened stability is 12 months. Stability testing is ongoing.
d. Detection limit:
Analytical performance of the device around the cutoff is described in Section M.1.a. (Precision/Reproducibility) above.
e. Analytical specificity:
Analytical specificity studies were performed with the Snap-Top SK Cup to determine whether drugs and drug metabolites within the same class of drugs or with similar molecular structures cross- react in the test system. Reference standards for the various metabolites and compounds were prepared at 100 µg/mL in pooled negative human urine samples. Compounds that tested positive were serially diluted until a negative result was observed. Results shown are expressed as the minimum concentration producing a positive result in the indicated assay. A list of these compounds and their level of cross reactivity is shown below.
| Related Compound or Cross-Reactant | Result | % Cross Reactive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Barbiturate (BAR) (Secobarbital) (300 ng/mL) | | |
| Butabarbital | Positive at 75 ng/mL | 400% |
| Butethal | Positive at 250 ng/mL | 120% |
| Pentobarbital | Positive at 300 ng/mL | 100% |
| Phenobarbital | Positive at 250 ng/mL | 120% |
| Aprobarbital | Positive at 200 ng/mL | 150% |
| Barbital | Positive at 250 ng/mL | 120% |
| Alphenal | Positive at 600 ng/mL | 50% |
| Amobarbital | Positive at 850 ng/mL | 35% |
| Cyclopentobarbital | Positive at 600 ng/mL | 50% |
| Allobarbital | Positive at 1000 ng/mL | 30% |
{9}
| Butalbital | Positive at 5000 ng/mL | 6% |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Mephobarbital | Positive at 50000 ng/mL | 1% |
| Barbituric Acid | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
| Glutethimide | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
| Hexobarbital | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
| Phenytoin (diphenylhydantoin) | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
| Thiopental | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
| Benzodiazepines (BZO) (Oxazepam) (300 ng/mL) | | |
| Temazepam glucuronide | Positive at 50 ng/mL | 600% |
| Clobazam | Positive at 98 ng/mL | 306% |
| N-Desmethylflunitrazepam | Positive at 100 ng/mL | 300% |
| Nitrazepam | Positive at 100 ng/mL | 300% |
| Oxazepam glucuronide | Positive at 100 ng/mL | 300% |
| Temazepam | Positive at 125 ng/mL | 240% |
| RS-Lorazepam glucuronide | Positive at 150 ng/mL | 200% |
| Diazepam | Positive at 195 ng/mL | 154% |
| Flunitrazepam | Positive at 195 ng/mL | 154% |
| Clorazepate | Positive at 200 ng/mL | 150% |
| Alprazolam | Positive at 250 ng/mL | 120% |
| Desalkylflurazepam | Positive at 390 ng/mL | 77% |
| Nordiazepam | Positive at 390 ng/mL | 77% |
| Clonazaepam | Positive at 400 ng/mL | 75% |
| Bromazepam | Positive at 1000 ng/mL | 30% |
| Estazolam | Positive at 1250 ng/mL | 24% |
| α-hydroxyalprazolam | Positive at 1262 ng/mL | 24% |
| Lorazepam (d,l) | Positive at 1500 ng/mL | 20% |
| Triazolam | Positive at 2500 ng/mL | 12% |
| Chlordiazepoxide | Positive at 3125 ng/mL | 10% |
| N-Desmethylchlordiazepoxide | Positive at 6250 ng/mL | 5% |
| Midazolam | Positive at 12500 ng/mL | 2% |
| Triazolam, 1-hydroxy | Positive at 50000 ng/mL | N/A |
| 7-Aminoclonazepam | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
| 7-Aminoflunitrazepam | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
| Flurazepam | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
{10}
11
| Cocaine (COC) (Benzoylecgonine) 150 ng/mL | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cocaethylene | Positive at 9325 ng/mL | 2% |
| Cocaine | Positive at 2000 ng/mL | 8% |
| Ecgonine | Positive at 30000 ng/mL | 1% |
| Ecgonine Methyl Ester | Negative at 100000 ng/mL | N/A |
## Prescription Drugs
Drug free urine samples were spiked with BAR, BZO, and COC concentrations that were at 50% (negative) and 150% (positive) of cutoff. Concentrations of 100,000 ng/mL of structurally-unrelated compounds were then added to the preparation and assayed using the Snap-Top SK Cup. None of the following compounds affected the expected results:
| N-Acetylprocainamide | Fenoprofen | Niacinamide | Sulfamethazine |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Amoxicillin | Furosemide | Nifedipine | Sulindac |
| Ampicillin | Hydralazine | Noscapine | Tetracycline |
| l-Ascorbic Acid | Hydrochlorothiazide | Oxolinic acid | Tetrahydrocortisone 3-acetate |
| Atropine | Hydrocortisone | Oxymetazoline | Tetrahydrozoline |
| Chlorothiazide* | o-Hydroxyhippuric acid | Papaverine | Thiamine |
| Chlorpromazine | Ketamine | Penicillin-G | Thioridazine |
| Clonidine | Ketoprofen | Perphenazine | Tolbutamide |
| l-Cotinine | Labetalol | Phenelzine | Triamterene |
| Cortisone | Loperamide | Prednisone | Trifluoperazine |
| Diclofenac | Meprobamate | d,l-Propranolol | Trimethoprim |
| Diflunisal | Methoxyphenamine | Quinine | d,l-Tryptophan |
| Digoxin | Methylphenidate | Quinidine | Verapamil |
| Diphenhydramine | Nalidixic acid | Serotonin | Zomepirac |
| Erythromycin | | | |
## pH and Specific Gravity
The Snap-Top SK Cup was assayed with pH values of 3.0, 4.0, 7.0 and 9.0. The pH samples were fortified with drug concentrations at 50% (negative) and 150% (positive) of cutoff for BAR, BZO, and COC. Each sample was assayed in triplicate. All pH samples gave negative results at the 50% of cutoff level for each drug, and all gave positive results at the 150% of cutoff level for each drug.
The Snap-Top SK Cup was assayed in triplicate with samples with specific gravity
{11}
values of 1.003, 1.015 and 1.030. The specific gravity samples were fortified with drug concentrations as described above for pH. All specific gravity samples gave negative results at the 50% of cutoff level for each drug, and all gave positive results at the 150% of cutoff level for each drug.
## Structurally-unrelated
Drug free urine samples were spiked with BAR, BZO, and COC concentrations that were at 50% (negative) and 150% (positive) of cutoff. Concentrations of 100,000 ng/mL of structurally-unrelated compounds were then added to the preparation and assayed using the Snap-Top SK Cup. None of the following compounds affected the expected results: acetylsalicylic acid, acetaminophen, bropheniramine maleate, caffeine, carbamazepine, chlorpheniramine, cocaine, dextromethorphan, doxylamine, ibuprofen, morphine, phenobarbital, phenytoin (diphenylhydantoin), d-pseudoephedrine, salicylic acid.
The labeling states that there is the possibility that other substances and/or factors not listed above may interfere with the test and cause false results.
## f. Assay cut-off:
Analytical performance of the device around the cutoff is described in Section M.1.a. (Precision/Reproducibility) above.
## 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The accuracy of the Snap-Top SK Cup was evaluated at three sites representative of laboratory, workplace, and POC settings with blind coded clinical urine samples that contained varying concentrations of drugs as determined by GC/MS or LC/MS/MS. Results summaries are provided below, for all sites combined:
| | | Negative Urine | Near Cutoff Negative by GC/MS (Between - 50% and the cutoff) | Near Cutoff Positive by GC/MS (Between the cutoff and +50%) | High Positive by GC/MS (greater than +50%) | % Total Agreement with GCMS |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Barbiturates | Positive Results | 0 | 2 | 4 | 36 | 97.8 |
| | Negative Results | 45 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Benzodiazepines | Positive | 0 | 2 | 4 | 36 | 97.6 |
{12}
13
Summary of discordant results shown in the table above:
| Sample Numbers | Drug Test | Cutoff value (ng/mL) | Result (POS/NEG) | Drug/Metabolite GC/MS value (ng/mL) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | Drug /Metabolite | GC/MS value (ng/ml) |
| 86 | BAR | 300 | POS | Butalbital | 4788 |
| 88 | BAR | 300 | POS | Phenobarbital | 160 |
| 39 | BZO | 300 | POS | Oxazepam | 271 |
| 42 | BZO | 300 | POS | Oxazepam | 235 |
b. Lay user study:
Not applicable. The assay is intended for prescription use.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
{13}
4. Clinical cut-off
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence determination.
14
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.