IDS-ISYS 25-HYDROXY VITAMIN DS, AND IDS-ISYS 25 HYDROXY VITAMIN DS CONTROL SET
K140554 · Immunodiagnostic Systems , Ltd. · MRG · Dec 19, 2014 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K140554
Device Name
IDS-ISYS 25-HYDROXY VITAMIN DS, AND IDS-ISYS 25 HYDROXY VITAMIN DS CONTROL SET
Applicant
Immunodiagnostic Systems , Ltd.
Product Code
MRG · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 19, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1825
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin DS Assay (IDS-iSYS 25OHDS) is intended for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) and other hydroxylated metabolites in human serum on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. Results are to be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory data to assist the clinician in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency in an adult population. The IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin DS (25OHDS) Control Set is used for quality control of the IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin DS assay on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System
Device Story
Chemiluminescent immunoassay for quantitative measurement of 25-hydroxy vitamin D in human serum. Operates on IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. Process: sample pretreatment to denature Vitamin D Binding Protein; neutralization in buffer; addition of acridinium-labeled anti-25-OHD antibody; incubation; addition of 25-OHD-coated magnetic particles; magnetic capture; wash; trigger reagent addition. Light emission is inversely proportional to 25-OHD concentration. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians. Results assist clinicians in assessing patient vitamin D sufficiency.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (n=80 per sample, CVs 7.2-10.6%). Linearity per CLSI EP-6A (R2=1.00, range 7-125ng/mL). LoB 0.6ng/mL, LoD 2.6ng/mL, LoQ 7.0ng/mL. Method comparison (n=99) against ID-LC-MS/MS RMP showed Passing-Bablok slope 0.95; comparison against predicate (n=283) showed slope 0.96. Specificity testing performed for various vitamin D metabolites and potential interferents (triglycerides, bilirubin, hemoglobin, biotin, HAMA). Reference range established in 275 healthy adults (12.7–64.2ng/mL).
Indicated for quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and hydroxylated metabolites in human serum to assist clinicians in assessing vitamin D sufficiency in adult populations. Prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vitamin D test system is a device intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) and other hydroxylated metabolites of vitamin D in serum or plasma to be used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Vitamin D test systems must comply with the following special controls:(1) Labeling in conformance with 21 CFR 809.10 and
(2) Compliance with existing standards of the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Predicate Devices
IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D (k091849)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k140554
B. Purpose for Submission:
Modification of traceability for standardization, and modification of antibody pools of the previously cleared device, k091849
C. Measurand:
25-hydroxyvitamin D and other hydroxylated metabolites of vitamin D
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Immunodiagnostic Systems Limited
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D⁵ Assay
IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D⁵ Control Set
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1825, Vitamin D Test System
21 CFR 862.1660, Quality Control Material
2. Classification:
Class II
Class I, reserved
{1}
3. Product code:
MRG-Vitamin D Test System
JJX-Single (specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed and Unassayed)
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{S}}$ Assay (IDS-iSYS 25OHD$^{\text{S}}$) is intended for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) and other hydroxylated metabolites in human serum on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. Results are to be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory data to assist the clinician in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency in an adult population.
The IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{S}}$ (25OHD$^{\text{S}}$) Control Set is used for quality control of the IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{S}}$ assay on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated Analyzer.
I. Device Description:
The IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{S}}$ Assay consists of a reagent cartridge and one set of calibrators.
The reagent cartridge contains multiple reagents:
MPV1 - Magnetic particles coated with 25-OHD in a phosphate buffer containing methanol with sodium azide (<0.1%) as preservative (1 vial, 2.0 mL)
CONJ - Anti-25-OH D sheep polyclonal antibody labeled with an acridinium ester derivative, in buffer containing bovine, sheep, rabbit and mouse proteins with sodium azide (<0.1%) as preservative (1 vial, 10.1 mL)
NaOH - Sodium hydroxide solution <0.5 M (1 vial, 5.2 mL)
2
{2}
BUF - Assay buffer containing proprietary displacing compounds, methanol, and sodium azide (<0.1%) as preservative (1 vial, 26.0 mL)
Calibrators:
Kit Calibrators A and B (CAL A & CAL B) (1 vial of each, 2.5 mL per vial) contain horse serum in a buffer matrix with two defined concentrations of 25-OHD and sodium azide (<0.1%) as a preservative.
The Calibrator target values are as follows:
Kit Calibrator A 5.5 ng/mL
Kit Calibrator B 64.5 ng/mL
IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D⁵ Control Set (sold separately):
The IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D⁵ Control Set (3 vials of each level, 2.5 mL per vial) contains horse serum in a buffer matrix with three defined concentrations of 25-OH D and sodium azide (<0.1%) as a preservative.
The control ranges are as follows:
CTL1 range: 12.0 – 18.0 ng/mL
CTL2 range: 26.4 – 39.6 ng/mL
CTL3 range: 59.0 – 86.0 ng/mL
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k091849
3. Comparison with predicate:
Assay:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D (k091849) | Candidate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D^{S} Assay |
| Intended Use | Quantitative determination of 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D and other hydroxylated metabolites in human serum. | Same |
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D (k091849) | Candidate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D^{S} Assay |
| Indications for use | Results are to be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory data to assist the clinician in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency in an adult population. | Same |
| Analyte | 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D (25-OHD) | Same |
| Sample Type | Human serum | Same |
| Reagent Storage | 2-8 °C | Same |
| Test Methodology | Chemiluminescent immunoassay using magnetic-particle solid phase and acridinium label | Same |
| Kit reagent components | Reagent cartridge (1 vial each of MPV1, CONJ, NaOH & BUF), two concentration levels of calibrators (A&B) (1 vial of each) | Same |
| Calibration procedure | User-initiated 2 point calibration to adjust the batch related master curve. The system stores the calibration for the interval specified in the kit instructions for use. | Same |
4
{4}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D(k091849) | Candidate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D5Assay |
| Kit reagent component volumes | Reagent cartridge (1 vial each): MPV1 (2.6mL), CONJ (7.1mL), NaOH (5.2mL) & BUF (26.0mL) | Reagent cartridge (1 vial each): MPV1 (2.0mL), CONJ (10.1mL), NaOH (5.2mL) & BUF (26.0mL) |
| Traceability/Standardization | Traceable to U.V. quantification | Traceable to the isotope dilution-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) 25(OH) vitamin D Reference Method Procedure (RMP) which was used in assigning the target value for the VDSP samples.The ID-LC-MS/MS RMP is traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2972. |
| Antibodies | Anti-25 OHD Sheep Polyclonal IgG | Same, but with a different source of antibody pool |
| Calibration interval | 7 days | 14 days |
| Calibrator shelf life | 8 months | 6 months |
| Measuring range | 6 – 126 ng/mL | 7 – 125 ng/mL |
| Reference range | Non-parametric reference interval: 7.9 – 57.8 ng/mL (n=150) | Non-parametric reference interval: 12.7 – 64.2 ng/mL (n=275) |
| On board the analyzer reagent stability | 7 days | 21 days |
{5}
Controls:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Control Set (k091849) | Candidate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D\(^S\) Control Set |
| Intended Use | For quality control of the IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D assay on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. | Same |
| Number of levels | 3 | Same |
| Matrix | Horse serum in buffer | Same |
| Packaging | Provided separately | Same |
| Storage temperature | 2-8°C | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Control Set (k091849) | Candidate device IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D\(^S\) Control Set |
| Standardization/Traceability | Traceable to U.V. quantification | Traceable to the ID-LC/MS/MS 25 (OH) vitamin D Reference Measurement Procedure |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI C28-A2: How to Define and Determine Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP9-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
{6}
CLSI EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
L. Test Principle:
The assay is based on chemiluminescence technology. Samples are subjected to a pretreatment step to denature the Vitamin D Binding Protein (VDBP). The treated samples are then neutralized in assay buffer and a specific anti-25-OHD antibody labelled with acridinium is added. Following an incubation step, magnetic particles linked to 25-OHD are added. Following a further incubation step, the magnetic particles are “captured” using a magnet. After a washing step and addition of trigger reagents, the light emitted by the acridinium label is inversely proportional to the concentration of 25-OHD in the original sample.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A study was performed in accordance with CLSI EP5 A2 where six (6) serum samples (ranging from 12.0 ng/mL to 116.5 ng/mL) were assayed using three (3) lots of reagents in duplicate (n=2), twice per day for 20 days on three (3) analyzers. Each analyzer/reagent lot produced similar precision results. The within-run and total precision results are summarized in the table below using one representative lot of reagents:
| | | Within-run | | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | n | Mean (ng/mL) | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| Serum1 | 80 | 13.2 | 0.8 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 10.6 |
| Serum 2 | 80 | 27.2 | 1.5 | 5.4 | 2.5 | 9.0 |
| Serum 3 | 80 | 38.9 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 3.5 | 9.1 |
| Serum 4 | 80 | 54.5 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 9.1 |
| Serum 5 | 80 | 77.2 | 4.0 | 5.2 | 6.6 | 8.5 |
| Serum 6 | 80 | 119.9 | 6.1 | 5.1 | 8.6 | 7.2 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity was evaluated based on CLSI EP-6A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach. Samples were prepared by diluting a serum sample with a high 25-OH vitamin D concentration with a serum sample with a low 25-OH vitamin D concentration to obtain eleven (11) concentration levels across the measuring range. Samples were run in duplicate, using
{7}
one reagent lot with sample range tested between 5.8 to 152.9 ng/mL. The linear regression of the observed mean concentrations versus the expected concentration was calculated.
The resulting linear regression equation was y = 0.96x + 2.1 ng/mL, R² = 1.00
The results of the linearity study support the sponsor’s claim that the assay is linear from 7-125 ng/mL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
## Standardization and Traceability
The IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D⁵ Assay was originally cleared under 510(k) k091849. IDS has modified the assay by standardizing the cleared vitamin D assay in accordance with the Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP). The VDSP is an international collaborative effort to standardize the laboratory measurement of serum 25-OH vitamin D. This collaboration involves the coordinated efforts of the National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Standards and Technology (NIST), Ghent University, and other institutions. Please refer to http://ods.od.nih.gov/Research/VitaminD.aspx for more information on the VDSP program.
To achieve standardization against the VDSP recognized Reference Measurement Procedure (RMP), the IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D⁵ assay master calibration parameters were aligned to the CDC VDSP by using 70 human serum samples from the CDC VSDP program which were value assigned by the RMP and traceable to NIST SRM2972.
## Calibrator traceability and value assignment
This assay is traceable to the isotope dilution-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-/MS/MS) 25-OH Vitamin D Reference Method Procedure (RMP) that is traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2972. The calibrator traceability and value assignment are prepared according to an internal procedure.
Kit calibrators are lot specific for each assay kit. Master calibrators and kit calibrators A and B are prepared gravimetrically from the stock solution or an intermediate stock solution. For value assignment, the kit calibrators are tested as unknowns in a minimum of 20 assay runs using one analyzer. Each run is calibrated using master calibrators. The values are then adjusted to ensure batch-to-batch consistency where necessary. The final assigned values obtained for the kit calibrators are verified on three additional analyzers. The values must fall within specified acceptable ranges. The calibrator target values are listed below:
Calibrator A target value: 5.5 ng/mL
Calibrator B target value: 64.5 ng/mL
{8}
The IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{S}}$ assay (candidate device) has passed the certification process for the CDC VDSP and a certificate has been provided by the CDC. Please see, http://www.cdc.gov/labstandards/hs.html for more information on the CDC VDSP certification program.
## Stability
The calibrator and control shelf-life and open-vial stability testing protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be adequate. Once opened, calibrators and controls are stable for up to 2.5 hours on board the analyzer. Current accelerated shelf life studies support the assigned six-month shelf life, with real-time studies ongoing.
## d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantification (LoQ) studies were performed according to CLSI EP-17A.
To establish the Limit of Blank (LoB), the zero calibrator was assayed in replicates of 10 on 10 separate days giving a total of 100 measurements. The Limit of Blank was determined by calculating the concentration corresponding to the mean zero calibrator minus two standard deviations from the calibration curve. The LoB claim is 0.6 ng/mL.
The Limit of Detection (LoD) study was performed by assaying 10 samples (native and/or diluted) with very low vitamin D concentrations (ranging from 1.9 ng/mL to 8.0 ng/mL) in duplicate in 12 runs spanning multiple days giving a total of 240 data points. The LoD claim is 2.6 ng/mL.
The Limit of Quantification (LoQ) was determined by measuring 13 low samples (native and/or diluted) in a concentration range of 2.8 – 24.6 ng/mL in duplicate over 7 individual runs spanning multiple days giving a total of 182 data points. The LoQ claim is 7.0 ng/mL and was calculated by interpolating the concentration of the analyte from the regression curve at 20% precision CV.
Detection limits results:
| Limit of Blank | Limit of Detection | Limit of Quantitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0.6 ng/mL | 2.6 ng/mL | 7.0 ng/mL |
The reportable range of the assay is 7-125 ng/mL.
## e. Analytical specificity:
An endogenous interference study was performed based on CLSI EP7-A2 guideline to assess common or known substances that could interfere with IDS-iSYS 25-
{9}
Hydroxy Vitamin D $^{\text{S}}$ assay. The potential interferents listed below were spiked into human serum samples with different levels of 25-OH vitamin D. Each sample was tested in replicates of 26. The 25-OH vitamin D values of the spiked samples were compared to the reference samples containing no interferent. Significant interference was defined as greater or equal to $\pm 10\%$ difference from the expected concentration. The interference study results are summarized in the following table:
| Potential Interferent | Sample 25OHD concentration (ng/mL) | Highest Tested Concentration at which no significant interference (≤10%) was observed |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bilirubin, conjugated | 18.0 and 65.7 | 30 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 19.2 and 71.7 | 40 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 50.0 and 87.9 | 500 mg/dL |
| Red blood cells | 15.5 and 65.8 | 0.2% |
| Biotin | 17.0 and 66.2 | 300 nmol/L |
| HAMA | 18.2 and 72.8 | 500 ng/mL |
| Vitamin D binding protein | 18.9 and 76.0 | 2000 ng/mL |
The package insert contains the following limitation: The presence of hemoglobin at concentrations $>40\mathrm{mg/dL}$ might lead to falsely depressed values. Do not use hemolyzed samples.
Rheumatoid Factor: Interference from rheumatoid factor (RF) was assessed using a recovery study. Serum samples containing $18.7\mathrm{ng / mL}$ and $21.4\mathrm{ng / mL}$ of 25OHD were spiked with $1500~\mathrm{IU / mL}$ of RF and tested in replicates of 4. The results were compared to results from samples not containing RF. Non-significant interference is defined as a recovery of between $90 - 110\%$ . The highest tested concentration of RF at which no significant interference was observed was $1500~\mathrm{IU / mL}$ .
# Cross reactivity studies:
To evaluate the cross reactivity potential of substances with a similar chemical structure as 25(OH) vitamin D, two separate studies were performed. Literature describes problems with assessing $\%$ cross reactivity using exogenous spiked samples due to the hydrophobic nature of vitamin D molecules and changes in sample matrix with addition of organic solvents which may not reflect the actual $\%$ recovery of the endogenous 25-OH Vitamin D2 and D3 isoforms in the tested sample. Therefore, the $\%$ cross reactivity of the 25-OH Vitamin D2 and D3, and 24, 25 $(\mathrm{OH})_2$ D3 isoforms were tested mimicking endogenous conditions by adding endogenous 25(OH) vitamin D metabolite to serum samples. Endogenous 25(OH) vitamin D metabolites were spiked into vitamin D serum samples and analyzed with the IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin $\mathbf{D}^{\mathrm{S}}$ assay. The concentration of un-spiked sample and spike concentration were determined by a LC-MS/MS 25(OH)D method. The spiked sample was measured with the IDS-iSYS 25-
{10}
Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{S}}$ assay. The % cross-reactivity was calculated based on following equation:
Mean conc. of spiked sample – mean conc. of unspiked sample x100%
Spiked concentration
Cross reactivity results
| Cross Reactant | Spike Conc. (ng/mL) | Un-spiked sample value (ng/mL) | Spiked sample value (ng/mL) | % Cross Reactivity | Mean % Cross Reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25(OH)D_{3} | 10.0 | 20.2 | 29.2 | 90% | 97% |
| | 20.0 | 14.3 | 35.1 | 104% | |
| 25(OH)D_{2} | 10.0 | 16.1 | 28.5 | 124% | 120% |
| | 20.0 | 11.1 | 34.4 | 117% | |
| 24,25(OH)_{2}D_{3} | 5.0 | 66.2 | 72.4 | 124% | 124% |
Due to the naturally low concentrations which exist endogenously, the other vitamin D metabolites are not expected to cause clinically significant cross-reactivity with the assay. Therefore, exogenous spiking was used to test the cross-reactivity of the vitamin D metabolites listed below. Exogenous synthetic 25(OH) vitamin D metabolites were spiked into vitamin D serum samples. The un-spiked and spiked samples were measured with the IDS-iSYS 25- Hydroxy Vitamin Ds assay. The % cross reactivity was calculated based on the following equation:
Mean conc. of spiked sample – mean conc. of unspiked sample x100%
Spiked concentration
Cross reactivity results
| Cross Reactant | Spiked conc. (ng/mL) | Sample Native conc. (ng/mL) | % Cross reactivity | Mean % Cross reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3-epi-25(OH)D3 | 100.0 | 9.4 | 0% | |
| | 100.0 | 36.4 | 3% | 1% |
| 3-epi-25(OH)D2 | 100.0 | 8.6 | 0% | |
| | 100.0 | 33.4 | 2% | 1% |
| 1,25-(OH)2 D3 | 2.0 | 7.1 | 19% | |
| | 2.0 | 31.2 | -65% | -23% |
| 1,25-(OH)2 D2 | 20.0 | 8.6 | 13% | |
| | 20.0 | 37.9 | 5% | 9% |
| Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol) | 1000.0 | 6.9 | 0% | |
| | 1000.0 | 30.8 | 0% | 0% |
{11}
12
| Vitamin D2 (Ergocalciferol) | 100.0 | 7.4 | 1% | 0% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 100.0 | 37.3 | -2% | |
| Paricalcitol | 100.0 | 8.2 | 0% | 0% |
| | 100.0 | 33.4 | 2.9% | |
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A method comparisons study was performed to compare the modified (standardized) IDS-iSYS 25 Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{S}}$ assay to the non-standardized IDS-iSYS 25 Hydroxy Vitamin D assay (k091849). Following CLSI EP9- guidelines, an internal method comparison study was performed with a total of 283 native serum samples tested in singlicate on the IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{S}}$ Assay and on the predicate device. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was performed to produce a summary of results for each study, as shown below.
| Passing Bablok | y= 0.96x + 1.1 |
| --- | --- |
| Slope, 95% Confidence Interval | 0.91 to 1.01 |
| Intercept, 95% Confidence Interval | -0.3 to 2.3 ng/mL |
| Correlation Coefficient, r | 0.94 |
| n | 283 |
| Range tested | 7.3-115.1 ng/mL |
An additional method comparison study was performed to demonstrate the accuracy of the newly aligned IDS-iSYS 25 Hydroxy Vitamin D$^{\text{s}}$ assay. With the aligned assay master calibration parameters, 99 independent samples value assigned by ID-LC-MS/MS RMP (9.0 ng/ml to 98.6 ng/mL), were used to assess the IDS-iSYS 25 Hydroxy Vitamin Ds assay traceability against the ID-LC-MS/MS RMP. The test result range on the candidate device was 10.5 to 96.1 ng/mL. The correlation between the IDS-iSYS (y) and the ID-LC-MS/MS RMP (x) is described using Passing-Bablok regression & Deming regression:
Passing Bablok regression:
IDS-iSYS = 0.95 x (ID-LC-MS/MS RMP) +0.8ng/mL
95 % CI of the slope: 0.86 to 1.04
95 % CI of the intercept: -1.32 to 3.08ng/mL
Deming regression:
IDS-iSYS = 0.94x (ID-LC-MS/MS RMP) +1.34ng/mL
95 % CI of the slope: 0.86 to 1.01
95 % CI of the intercept: -0.78 to 3.45ng/mL
{12}
Correlation coefficient, r: 0.925
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable, only serum may be used.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
An expected values study was performed according to the non-parametric method in CLSI C28-A2 guideline. Samples from 275 apparently healthy light skin and dark skin male (71.6%) and female (28.4%) adults, aged 21-77 years, living in geographical diverse regions of the United States to represent a broad spectrum of UV light exposure in the intended use population, were collected. The samples were tested for 25-OH vitamin D concentrations using the IDS-iSYS 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D⁵ Assay. The 95% reference interval was calculated by a non-parametric method following C28-A2. The following range was obtained:
Normal Adults: 12.7 – 64.2 ng/mL (n=275)
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.