K140361 · Medacta International · KWQ · Jun 12, 2014 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K140361
Device Name
META-C CERVICAL PLATE
Applicant
Medacta International
Product Code
KWQ · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 12, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3060
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Mecta-C plate system is intended for anterior Interbody screw/plate fixation from C2 to T1. The system is indicated for use in the temporary stabilization of the anterior spine during the development of cervical spine fusions with: 1) degenerative disc disease (as defined by neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), 2) trauma (including fractures), 3) tumors, 4) deformity (defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis), 5) psuedarthrosis, and/or 6) failed previous fusion. This device system is intended for anterior cervical intervertebral body fusions only.
Device Story
Mecta-C Cervical Plate system; provides temporary anterior spinal stabilization to promote fusion; used in cervical spine (C2-T1). System comprises titanium alloy plates (up to 4 levels) and screws (fixed/variable angle; self-tapping/self-drilling). Surgeon implants device during anterior cervical intervertebral body fusion procedure. Device stabilizes vertebral bodies; supports bone healing. Biomechanical performance verified via static/dynamic compression and torsion testing per ASTM F1717.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Biomechanical testing included static compression yield strength, static compression stiffness, dynamic compression, static torsion yield torque, static torsion stiffness, and screw-plate interface push-out strength, all performed per ASTM F1717.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Ti6Al4V ELI (ISO 5832-3/ASTM F 136). Components: Plates (20-92mm length), screws (4mm/4.5mm diameter, 12-22mm length). Fixation: Fixed or variable angle screws with self-tapping or self-drilling tips. Sterilization: Available sterile or unsterile. Mechanical testing: ASTM F1717.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring anterior cervical intervertebral body fusion (C2-T1) for degenerative disc disease, trauma (fractures), tumors, deformity (kyphosis, lordosis, scoliosis), pseudarthrosis, or failed previous fusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A spinal intervertebral body fixation orthosis is a device intended to be implanted made of titanium. It consists of various vertebral plates that are punched into each of a series of vertebral bodies. An eye-type screw is inserted in a hole in the center of each of the plates. A braided cable is threaded through each eye-type screw. The cable is tightened with a tension device and it is fastened or crimped at each eye-type screw. The device is used to apply force to a series of vertebrae to correct “sway back,” scoliosis (lateral curvature of the spine), or other conditions.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Medacta International. The logo consists of a stylized letter "M" formed by two triangles, followed by the text "edacta" in a sans-serif font. Below the word "edacta" is a horizontal line, and below that is the word "International" followed by a plus sign.
JUN 1 2 2014
# 510(k) Summary
Applicant/Sponsor: Medacta International SA Strada Regina 6874 Castel San Pietro (CH) Switzerland Phone (+41) 91 696 60 60 Fax (+41) 91 696 60 66
Contact Person: Adam Gross Director of Regulatory, Quality and Compliance Medacta USA 4725 Calle Quetzal, Unit B Camarillo, CA, 93012 Phone: (805) 322-3289 Fax: (805) 437-7553 Email: AGross@medacta.us.com
Date Prepared: February 5, 2014
# DEVICE INFORMATION
Trade/Proprietary Name: Mecta-C Cervical Plate Common Name: Anterior Cervical Plate Classification Name: appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body 21 CFR 888.3060 Class II Product Code(s): KWQ
Predicate Devices: )
| 510(k) | Product | 510(k) Holder | Clearance Date |
|---------|-------------------------|---------------|----------------|
| K000742 | CSLP | Synthes | 3/29/2000 |
| K001794 | Anterior Cervical Plate | EBI | 7/12/2000 |
| K974706 | ABC Plate | Aesculap | 3/13/1998 |
| K050451 | Vectra | Synthes | 3/24/2005 |
| K081038 | Atlantis | Medtronic | 8/15/2008 |
{1}------------------------------------------------
# Product Description
The Mecta-C Cervical Plate consists of single and multilevel plates up to four levels used to stabilize the cervical spine in order to promote fusion. The cervical plates are offered with lengths between 20 and 92mm and are made of Ti6AI4V ELI (ISO 5832-3/ASTM F 136). The plate is fixed on the vertebral body either by means of fixed angle or variable angle screws. Screws are available in 4mm and 4.5mm diameters with a length between 12mm and 22mm. The screws consist of an inner locking screw and the outer main screw shaft and are available with a self-tapping or a self-drilling tip. The main screw shaft is made of Ti6AI4V ELI (ISO 5832-3/ASTM F 136) and the locking screw is made of Ti6Al4V ELI (ISO 5832-3/ASTM F 136). The cervical plates and screws are available both in sterile and unsterile packaging.
### Indications for Use
The Mecta-C plate system is intended for anterior Interbody screw/plate fixation from C2 to T1. The system is indicated for use in the temporary stabilization of the anterior spine during the development of cervical spine fusions with: 1) degenerative disc disease (as defined by neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), 2) trauma (including fractures), 3) tumors, 4) deformity (defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis), 5) psuedarthrosis, and/or 6) failed previous fusion. This device system is intended for anterior cervical intervertebral body fusions only.
## Comparison to Predicate Devices
The indications for use, design features and materials of the Mecta-C Cervical Plate are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate devices. The substantial equivalence of the Mecta-C Cervical Plate implants are supported by the performance testing. materials information, and data analysis provided within this Premarket Notification.
## Performance Testing
The Mecta-C Cervical Plate biomechanical tests are defined according to the Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Spinal System 510(k)s, issued on May 3, 2004. The quidance suqqests performing static and dynamic compression tests as well as static torsion tests. Tests were performed on a two level construct as suggested in the ASTM F1717 standard. In addition to the recommended tests, screw push-out tests were performed in order to prove the substantial equivalence of the screw plate interface. The biomechanical test results of the Mecta-C Cervical Plate constructs were compared with results of the predicate devices and were determined not to be worst case. The Mecta-C Cervical Plate was tested using the worst-case device for each of the following tests:
Static Compression vield strength - ASTM F1717
{2}------------------------------------------------
Static Compression Stiffness - ASTM F1717 Dynamic Compression - ASTM F1717 Static Torsion yield torque - ASTM F1717 Static Torsion Stiffness - ASTM F1717 Screw plate interface strength: Push-out
# Conclusion:
Based on the above information, the Mecta-C Cervical Plate can be considered as substantially equivalent to its predicate devices.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with healthcare, consisting of a staff with two snakes coiled around it. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the caduceus.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
June 12, 2014
Medacta International SA % Mr. Adam Gross Medacta USA 1556 West Caroll Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60607
Re: K140361
Trade/Device Name: Mecta-C Cervical Plate Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3060 Regulation Name: Spinal intervertebral body fixation orthosis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KWO Dated: May 14, 2014 Received: May 15, 2014
Dear Mr. Gross:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{4}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
: .
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Ronald P. Jean -S for
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES |
|-----------------------------------------|
| Food and Drug Administration |
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Explration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last page.
510(k) Number (if known) K140361
Device Name Mecta-C Cervical Plate
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Mecta-C plate system is intended for anterior Interbody scrow/plate fixation from C2 to T1.
The system is indicated for use in the temporary spine during the development of cervical spine fusions in patients with: 1) degenerative disc disease (as defined by neck pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), 2) trauma (including frectures), 3) lumors, 4) defined as kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis, a 5) paudarthrosis, and/or of failed previous fusion. This device system is intended for anterior cervical intervetebral body fusions only.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
[x] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over . The Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
1 1 1 135 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FOR FOR FOR FOR USE ONLY 11 11 11 11 13 1 1 1850 - 1 1 Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
# Anton E. Dmitriev, PhD Division of Orthopedic Devices
FORM FDA 3881 (1/14)
Page 1 of 2
PSC Published Berniers (TDU 441 6743
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *Do Not Send Your completed Form TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
:
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@tda.hhs.gov
*An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.