Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System and Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System
K140325 · Joinsoon Medical Technology Co, Ltd. · NBW · Oct 13, 2015 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K140325
Device Name
Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System and Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System
Applicant
Joinsoon Medical Technology Co, Ltd.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Oct 13, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Joinsoon® EON L Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. The Joinsoon® EON L Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes in a home setting as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Joinson® EON L Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of circening of diabetes or for neonatal use. The Joinsoon® EON L Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The Joinsoon® Single Strips are for use with the Joinsoon® EON L Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. The Joinsoon® Control Solution is for use with the Joinsoon® HON L Glucose Meter and Joinsoon® Single Strips as a quality control check to verify that the meter and test strips are working together properly, and that the test is performing correctly. The Joinsoon® EON LS Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. The Joinsoon® EON LS Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes in a home setting as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Joinsoon® EON LS Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening of diabetes or for neonatal use. The Joinsoon® EON LS Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The Joinsoon® Snap Strips are for use with the Joinsoon® EON LS Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. The Joinsoon® Control Solution is for use with the Joinsoon® EON LS Glucose Meter and Joinsoon® Snap Strips as a quality control check to verify that the meter and test strips are working together properly and that the test is performing correctly.
Device Story
System uses electrochemical amperometry to measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood; dry reagent biosensor (test strip) contains glucose oxidase; current generated by glucose-reagent reaction is proportional to glucose concentration; embedded transfer function converts current to glucose value. Used by patients at home for diabetes monitoring; no coding required. Output displayed on meter; helps patients monitor diabetes control effectiveness. Includes meter, test strips, control solution, lancet, lancing device, and carrying case.
Clinical Evidence
User performance studies conducted with 150 lay users per system. Results compared to YSI reference method. For EON L: 100% of results within ±15 mg/dL (glucose <75 mg/dL) and ±15% (glucose ≥75 mg/dL). For EON LS: 100% of results within ±15 mg/dL (glucose <75 mg/dL) and ±15% (glucose ≥75 mg/dL). Regression analysis showed R²=0.996 for both systems. Bench testing included precision, linearity (20-600 mg/dL), interference, hematocrit (30-55%), and altitude (up to 10,745 ft).
Technological Characteristics
Amperometric glucose test system; glucose oxidase enzyme; 3V Lithium CR2032 power; 0.8µl sample volume; 4-second test time; 20-600 mg/dL range; 30-55% hematocrit range. No coding required. Connectivity/software details not specified beyond embedded transfer function.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative glucose measurement in fresh capillary whole blood from fingertips for self-testing by people with diabetes to monitor glycemic control. Contraindicated for diabetes diagnosis, screening, or neonatal use. Not for use on critically ill, shock, dehydrated, hypotensive, or hyper-osmolar patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Lifescan OneTouch® Select Glucose Monitoring System (K072543)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k140325
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Capillary whole blood glucose from the fingertip
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative Amperometric assay (Glucose Oxidase)
E. Applicant:
Joinsoon Medical Technology Co. Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System
Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1345, Glucose test system
21 CFR 862.1660, Quality Control Material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II, Class I (reserved)
3. Product code:
NBW, System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter
CGA, Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
JJX, Quality Control Material (Assayed and Unassayed), if applicable
{1}
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indication(s) for use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips.
The Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes in a home setting as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening of diabetes or for neonatal use.
The Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared.
The Joinsoon Single Strips are for use with the Joinsoon EON L Blood Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips.
The Joinsoon Control Solution is for use with the Joinsoon EON L Blood Glucose Meter and Joinsoon Single Strips as a quality control check to verify that the meter and test strips are working together properly, and that the test is performing correctly.
The Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips.
The Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes in a home setting as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening of diabetes or for neonatal use.
{2}
The Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared.
The Joinsoon Snap Strips are for use with the Joinsoon EON LS Blood Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips.
The Joinsoon Control Solution is for use with the Joinsoon EON LS Blood Glucose Meter and Joinsoon Snap Strips as a quality control check to verify that the meter and test strips are working together properly, and that the test is performing correctly.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- For In-Vitro Diagnostic Use Only
- For over-the-counter use
- For Self-Testing Only
- For Single Patient Use Only
- For over-the-counter use
- Not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Not for use on critically ill patients, patients in shock, dehydrated patients, hypotensive, or hyper-osmolar patients
- Do not test on neonates
- Do not use at altitudes above 10,745 feet (3,275 m)
- Do not perform any tests when humidity is below 10% or above 90%.
4. Special instrument requirements:
- Joinsoon EON L Blood Glucose Meter
- Joinsoon EON LS Blood Glucose Meter
I. Device Description:
The Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System contains the Joinsoon EON L Blood Glucose Meter and Joinsoon Single Strip test strips. The Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System contains the Joinsoon EON LS Blood Glucose Meter and Joinsoon Snap Strip test strips. Both meters are no-code meters. Components of both systems include Joinsoon Control Solutions, lancet, lancing device, quick start guide, user manual, warranty card and a carrying case.
The Joinsoon Single Strip test strips have one single test pad to be used with the Joinsoon EON L glucose meter, while the Joinsoon Snap Strip test strips have 10 individual test sections which can be broken off by the user and used one at a time with the Joinsoon EON LS glucose meter.
{3}
There are 3 levels of Joinsoon Control Solution available for use with both systems; Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3. Level 2 is included in the test kit. Levels 1 and 3 can be purchased separately.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Lifescan OneTouch Select Glucose Monitoring System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k072543
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities of the Blood Glucose Systems | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate Device Lifescan OneTouch Select Glucose Monitoring System (k072543) | Candidate Device Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System | Candidate Device Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | For quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control | Same | Same |
| Detection method | Amperometric biosensor | Same | Same |
| Enzyme | Glucose Oxidase | Same | Same |
| Test range | 20 - 600 mg/dL | Same | Same |
| Sample type | Capillary whole blood | Same | Same |
| Sample volume | 0.8 μL | Same | Same |
{4}
| Differences of the Blood Glucose Systems | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate Device Lifescan OneTouch Select Glucose Monitoring System (k072543) | Candidate Device Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System | Candidate Device Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System |
| Calibration Coding | Coding | Non-coding | Non-coding |
| Memory | 350 blood or control solution test results | 1000 blood and 250 control solution test results | 1000 blood and 250 control solution test results |
| Sample sites | Fingertip, forearm, palm | fingertip | fingertip |
| Sample test time | 5 seconds | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Similarities and differences of the control solution | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate Device One Touch Select Control Solutions (k072543) | Candidate Device Joinsoon Control Solution |
| Indications for Use | To check that the glucose meter and test strips are working together properly and that the test is performing correctly. | Same |
| Matrix | Viscosity-adjusted, aqueous liquid. | Same |
| Levels | 2 levels | 3 levels |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- IEC 60601-1-2, Medical electrical equipment Part 1-2: General Requirements for Safety-Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility- Requirements and tests.
- IEC 61000-4-2, 2008 EMC – Part 4-2: Testing and measurement technique-Electrostatic discharge immunity test
- IEC 61000-4-3, 2010 EMC – Part 4-3: Testing and measurement technique-Radiated, radio-frequency EMC field immunity test.
- IEC 61000-4-6, 2008 EMC – Part 4-6: Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by RF fields.
- IEC 61000-4-8, 2009 EMC – Part 4-8: Test and Measure. Techniques Power frequency magnetic field immunity test.
- IEC 61326-1-2005 electrical equipment for measurement control and laboratory use
{5}
EMC requirements Part 1-General requirements.
- IEC 61326-1-6:2005 EMC Requirements – Part 2-6: Particular requirements-In vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical equipment.
- ISO 17544:2003 Measure of quantity in bio. Samples: Metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials.
- CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
- CLSI EP7-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline.
- CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach
- CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of stability of in vitro diagnostic reagents
## L. Test Principle:
The Joinsoon EON L and EON LS Glucose Monitoring Systems use an electrochemical method based meter and dry reagent biosensor (test strip) for blood glucose testing. Both test strips, the Joinsoon Single Strips and Joinsoon Snap Strips utilize the enzyme glucose oxidase. Each non-coding test strip has a Reaction Zone with the Enzyme at one end, and contact pads at the other end. The electron accumulates on the electrode when glucose reacts with the reagent on the electrode. A current can be detected by the meter when a constant voltage is applied across the electrodes. The current is converted to a glucose concentration by an embedded transfer function in the meter. The size of the current is proportional to the amount of glucose present in the sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance
a. Precision/Reproducibility
### Within-run (Repeatability)
Venous blood from 3 donors was adjusted with glucose to five glucose levels (30-50, 51-110, 111-150, 151-250, 251-400) and tested on 3 lots of single test strips. Venous blood from 3 other donors was adjusted with glucose to the same five glucose levels and tested on 3 lots of multiple use test strips. Ten runs were performed on each sample with 5 replicates per run/strip lot resulting in 100 replicates for each lot and glucose level tested. Results are summarized below:
{6}
Joinsoon Single Strips
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | n | Lot | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30-50 | 100 | 1 | 39.3 | 3.01 | 7.66 |
| | | 2 | 40.6 | 3.06 | 7.54 |
| | | 3 | 42.5 | 2.96 | 6.96 |
| 51-110 | 100 | 1 | 98.6 | 3.08 | 3.12 |
| | | 2 | 97.2 | 3.38 | 3.48 |
| | | 3 | 95.8 | 3.53 | 3.68 |
| 111-150 | 100 | 1 | 139.9 | 5.23 | 3.74 |
| | | 2 | 143.5 | 4.91 | 3.42 |
| | | 3 | 144.9 | 4.9 | 3.38 |
| 151-250 | 100 | 1 | 234.8 | 8.75 | 3.73 |
| | | 2 | 235.4 | 7.77 | 3.30 |
| | | 3 | 241.2 | 6.86 | 2.84 |
| 251-400 | 100 | 1 | 375.0 | 12.27 | 3.27 |
| | | 2 | 371.2 | 11.94 | 3.22 |
| | | 3 | 368.8 | 10.72 | 2.91 |
Joinsoon Snap Strips
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | n | Lot | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30-50 | 100 | 1 | 40.5 | 3.16 | 7.80 |
| | | 2 | 42.2 | 3.14 | 7.44 |
| | | 3 | 41.5 | 3.10 | 7.47 |
| 51-110 | 100 | 1 | 95.0 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| | | 2 | 91.6 | 3.07 | 3.35 |
| | | 3 | 92.4 | 3.07 | 3.32 |
| 111-150 | 100 | 1 | 145.3 | 5.62 | 3.87 |
| | | 2 | 141.1 | 5.31 | 3.76 |
| | | 3 | 145.9 | 4.77 | 3.27 |
| 151-250 | 100 | 1 | 231.3 | 7.72 | 3.34 |
| | | 2 | 236.1 | 7.34 | 3.11 |
| | | 3 | 235.4 | 7.65 | 3.25 |
| 251-400 | 100 | 1 | 378.5 | 12.19 | 3.22 |
| | | 2 | 367.6 | 11.19 | 3.04 |
| | | 3 | 369.6 | 12.31 | 3.33 |
# Intermediate Precision
Intermediate precision testing was evaluated using three glucose control solutions on 3 test strip lots each of the Single and Snap Strip test strips, using 10 meters. Each concentration was measured once a day for 10 days, for a total of 100 measurements. Results are summarized below:
{7}
Joinsoon Single Strips:
| Control Level (mg/dL) | n | Strip Lot | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 40 | 100 | 1 | 40.3 | 3.0 | 7.47 |
| | | 2 | 40.5 | 2.8 | 6.84 |
| | | 3 | 40.7 | 3.1 | 7.52 |
| Level 2 120 | 100 | 1 | 121.9 | 3.9 | 3.20 |
| | | 2 | 124.2 | 4.1 | 3.30 |
| | | 3 | 121.2 | 4.0 | 3.30 |
| Level 3 360 | 100 | 1 | 360.4 | 7.8 | 2.16 |
| | | 2 | 359.3 | 8.5 | 2.37 |
| | | 3 | 359.4 | 9.5 | 2.64 |
Joinsoon Snap Strip:
| Control Level (mg/dL) | n | Strip Lot | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 40 | 100 | 1 | 40.4 | 2.0 | 4.40 |
| | | 2 | 40.9 | 3.0 | 7.36 |
| | | 3 | 40.9 | 2.8 | 6.82 |
| Level 2 120 | 100 | 1 | 123.3 | 3.7 | 3.00 |
| | | 2 | 121.9 | 4.3 | 3.50 |
| | | 3 | 123.5 | 4.2 | 3.40 |
| Level 3 360 | 100 | 1 | 358.9 | 8.5 | 2.37 |
| | | 2 | 358.7 | 8.4 | 2.34 |
| | | 3 | 360.2 | 9.2 | 2.55 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity was evaluated using 3 lots of Single Strips and 3 lots of Snap Strips, with 8 meters and 20 venous whole blood samples with glucose levels ranging from 20-600 mg/dL (24, 64, 89, 120, 150, 191, 216, 250, 265, 317, 343, 395, 405, 428, 465, 496, 505, 521, 576, and 610), obtained by spiking pooled venous blood with a glucose solution. Each glucose level was analyzed 8 times over 3 test strip lots. Linear regression analysis for each test strip lot compared to the YSI resulted in:
# Single Strips:
$\mathrm{y} = 0.9969\mathrm{x} + 0.9751;\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9995$ for Test Strip Lot 1
$\mathrm{y} = 0.9967\mathrm{x} - 0.0931;\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9991$ for Test Strip Lot 2
$\mathrm{y} = 0.9986\mathrm{x} + 0.7973;\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9995$ for Test Strip Lot 3
# Snap Strips:
$\mathrm{y} = 1.0067\mathrm{x} + 0.6969;\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9994$ for Test Strip Lot 1
$\mathrm{y} = 1.012\mathrm{x} - 2.3156;\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9991$ for Test Strip Lot 2
$\mathrm{y} = 0.9901\mathrm{x} + 1.8869;\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9992$ for Test Strip Lot 3
{8}
The results of the study support the claimed glucose measurement range of 20 to 600 mg/dL for both test strip configurations.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
**Traceability**
The system is traceable to the NIST SRM 917c reference material.
**Test Strip Stability**
Test strip stability was assessed in accelerated and real time studies. Testing protocols and acceptance criteria for the Single Strip and Snap Strip test strips were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The sponsor claims shelf life stability of 20 months and open vial stability of 3 months at 35.6°F-89.6°F (2°C-32°C) and 10-90% relative humidity.
**Control Solution Value assignment and stability:**
Value assignment of the 3 levels of Joinsoon Control Solutions was determined in an in-house procedure. The control solutions were prepared by gravimetric addition of glucose to achieve the target values of 40, 120 and 360 mg/dL for Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 respectively, and confirmed by YSI. The values for each level were assigned by repeat analysis using 100 test strips and 10 meters. The mean, SD and CV are used to establish the range for each solution, which is provided on the test strip vial labels.
Control stability was assessed using accelerated and real time testing. Protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable to support the sponsor's shelf life claim of 30 months and open vial claim of 3 months at 2°C-32°C.
d. Detection limit:
Reference the device reportable range and the linearity studies (section M.1.b.).
e. Analytical specificity:
To assess potential interference the sponsor used venous whole blood samples adjusted to three glucose concentration intervals of 76, 166, and 285 mg/dL. Each of these samples was tested with the Joinsoon EON L Blood Glucose Meter with Single Strip test strips and the Joinsoon EON LS Blood Glucose Meter with Snap Strips and against YSI for a reference method. Each potential interfering substance was tested at a minimum of two concentrations, normal/therapeutic and high/toxic concentrations. Each sample was tested 10 times using 3 strip lots and the % difference between the
{9}
system sample and the YSI sample was calculated. Results are presented in the table below:
| Potential Interfering Substance | Concentration at which no significant interference is observed (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 10 |
| Ascorbic acid | 5 |
| Bilirubin | 40 |
| Cholesterol | 600 |
| Creatinine | 30 |
| Dopamine | 8 |
| Galactose | 60 |
| Gentisic acid | 2 |
| Glutathione | 50 |
| Ibuprofen | 40 |
| L-ascorbic acid | 3 |
| L-Dopa | 7 |
| Maltose | 200 |
| Methyldopa | 2.5 |
| Salicylate | 60 |
| Tetracycline | 10 |
| Tolbutamide | 80 |
| Tolazamide | 4 |
| Triglycerides | 3000 |
| Urea | 120 |
| Uric acid | 8 |
| Xylose | 800 |
The sponsor has included the following statement in the labeling for both the Joinsoon EON L and Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring Systems:
If you are taking acetaminophen containing drugs (Tylenol etc.) or vitamin C at amounts higher than the recommended doses you may get inaccurate results with this system (Acetaminophen >10 mg/dL; Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) >5 mg/dL).
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device
{10}
# EON L Glucose Monitoring System with Single Strips:
To assess system accuracy, results from the Joinsoon EON L system were compared to the YSI reference method. Capillary fingerstick samples from 100 participants were obtained and tested using 3 lots of Joinsoon Single Strips. The range of samples tested was $30 - 557\mathrm{mg / dL}$ as measured on the reference (YSI). To obtain glucose concentrations $< 50~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , samples were allowed to glycolize and to obtain glucose concentrations $>400~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , samples were spiked. The results relative to reference are summarized below:
for glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6/8 (75%) | 8/8 (100%) | 8/8 (100%) |
for glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 81/92 (88%) | 90/92 (98%) | 92/92 (100%) | 92/92 (100%) |
Results from regression analysis: $\mathrm{Y} = 1.0117\mathrm{x} - 1.89$ , $\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9964$
# EON LS Glucose Monitoring System with Snap Strips:
To assess system accuracy, results from the Joinsoon EON L system were compared to the YSI reference method. Capillary fingerstick samples from 100 participants were obtained and tested using 3 lots of Joinsoon Single Test Strips. The range of samples tested was $25 - 590\mathrm{mg / dL}$ as measured on the reference (YSI). To obtain glucose concentrations $< 50~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , samples were allowed to glycolize and to obtain glucose concentrations $>400~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , samples were spiked. The results relative to reference are summarized below:
for glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5/8 (62.5%) | 8/8 (100%) | 8/8 (100%) |
for glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 72/92 (78.3%) | 91/92 (98.9%) | 92/92 (100%) | 92/92 (100%) |
Results from regression analysis: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.986 + 0.836$ , $\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9957$
# b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
{11}
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
# User performance studies:
# Joinsoon EON L Glucose Monitoring System with Single Strips:
To assess the performance of the EON L System with Single Strips in the hands of intended users, the sponsor performed a study with 150 lay users. The study participants obtained their own fingerstick samples and tested them on the EON L meter and 3 lots of Single Strips using only the product labeling written in English. Within 5 minutes, a technician collected a second capillary finger sample for comparison on the YSI analyzer. The glucose concentrations of the samples tested ranged from 57 to $366\mathrm{mg / dL}$ as measured on the reference. The lay user results with the EON L system compared to YSI are summarized below:
for glucose concentrations $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 12/14 (86%) | 14/14 (100%) | 14/14 (100%) |
for glucose concentrations $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 96/136 (71%) | 134/136 (98%) | 136/136 (100%) | 136/136 (100%) |
Regression analysis results for lay user EON L vs YSI:
$$
\mathrm {Y} = 1. 0 0 4 \mathrm {x} - 0. 4 6, \mathrm {R} ^ {2} = 0. 9 9 6
$$
# Joinsoon EON LS Glucose Monitoring System with Snap Strips:
To assess the performance of the EON LS System with Snap Strips in the hands of intended users, the sponsor performed a study with 150 lay users. The study participants obtained their own fingerstick samples and tested them on the EON LS meter and 3 lots of Snap Strips using only the product labeling written in English.
{12}
Within 5 minutes, a technician collected a second capillary finger sample for comparison on the YSI analyzer. The glucose concentrations of the samples tested ranged from 56 to 362 mg/dL as measured on the reference. The lay user results with the EON L system compared to YSI are summarized below:
for glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 10/14 (71.4%) | 14/14 (100%) | 14/14 (100%) |
for glucose concentrations ≥ 75 mg/dL
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 100/136 | 133/136 | 136/136 (100%) | 136/136 (100%) |
| (73.5%) | (97.8%) | | |
Regression analysis results for lay user EON L vs YSI:
$$
\mathrm {Y} = 0. 9 8 2 \mathrm {x} + 1. 2 8, \mathrm {R} ^ {2} = 0. 9 9 6
$$
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The labeling states that the expected glucose range for non-diabetic, non-pregnant fasting adults to be <100 mg/dL, and two hours after meals, the levels should be less than 140 mg/dL.
American Diabetes Association: Standard of Medical Care in Diabetes 2014, Diabetes Care, vol.38, Supplement 1, S8-S16. January 2015.
N. Instrument Name:
Joinsoon EON L blood glucose meter
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
This systems have two types of test strips as described in the device description above. Each test strip requires a sample volume of 0.8 uL.
Does the applicant's device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
Yes ☐ X ☑ or No ☐
{13}
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
Yes __________ or No ☐ X
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No __________
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with these devices. Samples are applied directly to the test strips as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The glucose tests are intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger. The whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strips by capillary action.
5. Calibration:
There is no calibration required by the user for the Joinsoon EON L or Joinsoon EON LS blood glucose meters. The meters are automatically coded.
6. Quality Control:
Glucose control solutions at 3 different concentrations (Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 are available; Level 2 is included) can be run with this device. The meter automatically distinguishes control solution from blood and marks control solution tests with a check mark and excludes them from average calculations. Recommendations on when to test the control materials are provided in the labeling. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial labels. The user is cautioned not to use the meter if the control result falls outside these ranges.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
1. Sample volume study:
The sponsor performed a sample volume study to verify the minimum sample volume requirement for the EON L and EON LS systems using blood samples at 2 glucose concentrations (48 and 150 mg/dL) and samples volumes ranging from 0.2 – 0.9 μL (0.2 μL, 0.3 μL, 0.4 μL, 0.5 μL, 0.6 μL, 0.7 μL, 0.8 μL, 0.9 μL and 1.0 μL). Results support the claimed sample volume of 0.8 μL. Validation testing demonstrated that the sample detection feature functioned appropriately when the sample volume was <0.8μL.
{14}
2. Altitude Study:
To evaluate the effects of altitude, the Joinsson EON L blood glucose meters were evaluated with 3 Single Strip lots and 3 Snap Strip lots tested on 6 meters using 3 whole blood samples each spiked to 3 glucose concentrations (77, 168, 285 mg/dL). The samples were tested at 2256, 4118, 7951, 9500 and 10,745 feet above sea level. Results obtained were compared with those obtained by YSI. The results demonstrate acceptable bias to the reference to support the claims in the labeling that altitudes up to 10,745 feet have no significant effect on blood glucose measurements from the Joinsoon EON L and EON LS Glucose Monitoring Systems.
3. Hematocrit Study:
The effect of different hematocrit levels on the EON L and EON LS systems was evaluated using venous whole blood samples with hematocrit levels of 30 - 55% (30, 35, 40, 45, 50, and 55%) spiked with glucose to achieve target concentrations of 77, 167, and 286 mg/dL. Results of samples at each hematocrit level were compared to the corresponding YSI value as well as to 40% Hct levels. Three Single and three Snap Strip test strip lots were used in the study. The % bias of the Joinsoon EON L and EON LS system results relative to YSI demonstrated adequate performance to support the claimed hematocrit range of 30-55%.
4. Test System operating conditions:
Temperature and humidity operating conditions were evaluated on the EON L and EON LS systems for temperatures ranging from 50°F-104°F and relative humidity from 10% to 90%, including extreme combinations of temperature and humidity, e.g. lowest humidity with lowest and highest temperature and highest humidity with lowest and highest temperature. Protocol and acceptance criteria were provided and found to be acceptable. The results supported the Sponsor's claimed operating conditions of 50°F-104°F (10°C -40°C) and relative humidity range from 10% to 90%.
5. Readability Assessment:
The readability of the labeling (user guide, quick reference guide and test strip insert) using a Flesch-Kincaid analysis were found to be written on average at the 8th grade level.
6. EMC Testing:
The sponsor provided documentation certifying that acceptable electromagnetic testing (EMC) had been performed using IEC 60601-1-2; Medical electrical equipment- Part 1-2: General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements and tests.
{15}
7. Infection Control Studies:
The device system is intended for single-patient use only. Disinfection efficacy studies were performed on the materials comprising the meter by an outside commercial testing laboratory demonstrating complete inactivation of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) with the chosen disinfectant, Barbicide Wipes Disinfecting Towelettes (EPA Registration # 46781-8-954). Robustness studies were also performed by the sponsor demonstrating that there was no change in performance or external materials of the meter after 2000 cleanings and 2000 disinfection steps with the Barbicide Wipes Disinfecting Towelettes. The robustness studies were designed to simulate 3 years of single-patient use. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.