K140201 · Arstasis, Inc. · DYB · Mar 28, 2014 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K140201
Device Name
AXERA 2 ACCESS SYSTEM
Applicant
Arstasis, Inc.
Product Code
DYB · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Mar 28, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1340
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K140201 · Mar 28, 2014
AXERA 2 ACCESS SYSTEM
Arstasis, Inc.
Retrospective patient cohort
A retrospective study of a smaller patient cohort was used to evaluate long-term safety and the ability to access and re-access the vasculature using the device.
The AXERA Access System is intended to provide access for the percutaneous introduction of devices into the peripheral vasculature and to promote hemostasis at the arteriotomy site as an adjunct to manual compression. AXERA is indicated for use in patients undergoing diagnostic femoral artery catheterization procedures using 5F or 6F introducer sheaths.
Device Story
AXERA 2 Access System facilitates percutaneous peripheral vascular access and promotes hemostasis at arteriotomy sites as adjunct to manual compression. Device components include Latchwire, anchor mechanism, shaft, and handle with control features. Operates by creating shallow access path through arterial wall for guidewire entry into vessel lumen. Used by physicians in clinical settings during diagnostic femoral artery catheterization. Output is physical access to arterial lumen; assists in device placement. Benefits include controlled access and hemostasis support.
Clinical Evidence
No new clinical data provided. Previous clinical performance established via prior clinical evaluations and cadaveric model simulated use testing. Safety and effectiveness supported by bench testing of device specifications related to IFU changes, including Latchwire attachment, tensile strength, and procedural sheath insertion.
Technological Characteristics
Catheter introducer system comprising Latchwire, anchor mechanism, shaft, and handle. Designed for shallow access path creation. Mechanical operation. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing diagnostic femoral artery catheterization procedures requiring 5F or 6F introducer sheaths.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A catheter introducer is a sheath used to facilitate placing a catheter through the skin into a vein or artery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows a black and white drawing of a series of lines. The lines are arranged in a seemingly random pattern, with some lines intersecting and overlapping each other. The lines vary in thickness, with some being thick and bold, while others are thin and faint. The overall effect is one of chaos and disorder.
## K140201 MAR 2 8 2014 p. 1 of 2 Arstasis
## SECTION 2. 510(k) SUMMARY
| Sponsor/Submitter: | Arstasis, Inc. |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | 740 Bay Road |
| Contact Person: | Grace Li |
| | Director of Quality |
| | Direct: (650) 261-8039 |
| | Email: gli@arstasis.com |
| Date of Submission: | January 24, 2014 |
| Device Trade Name: | AXERA 2 Access System |
| Common Name: | Catheter Introducer |
| Device Classification: | Class II |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 870.1340 |
| Classification Name: | Catheter Introducer |
| Product Code: | DYB |
| Predicate Device: | AXERA 2 Access System (K132263) |
| Device Description: | The AXERA 2 is a device that is comprised of a Latchwire, anchor<br>mechanism, shaft and handle with control features. |
| Indications for Use: | The AXERA Access System is intended to provide access for the<br>percutaneous introduction of devices into the peripheral vasculature<br>and to promote hemostasis at the arteriotomy site as an adjunct to<br>manual compression. AXERA is indicated for use in patients<br>undergoing diagnostic femoral artery catheterization procedures<br>using SF or 6F introducer sheaths. |
| Technological<br>Characteristics | The AXERA 2 Access Device is designed to create a shallow<br>access path through the arterial wall for the guidewire to enter the<br>vessel lumen. |
| Performance Data | The AXERA 2 Access System met all bench testing (i.e., Latchwire<br>attachment, tensile strength of Latchwire/anchor joint, and<br>procedural sheath insertion) acceptance criteria related to the<br>proposed changes to the Instructions for Use (IFU). Device is<br>unchanged for the predicate device. The predicate device met all |
- 5
{1}------------------------------------------------
performance testing acceptance criteria.
There are no changes to the Indications for Use. A note in the IFU Summary of was updated to provide alternate instructions for discontinuing the Substantial AXERA Access procedure. Equivalence: Bench testing of the AXERA 2 Access System was performed for device specifications related to the proposed changes to the IFU, following sterilization of test units. The following tests were performed: Latchwire attachment, tensile strength of Latchwire/anchor joint, and procedural sheath insertion. There are no changes to the AXERA 2 Access System device. Bench Testing performed for the predicate device is applicable and was not repeated for the subject AXERA 2 device. All acceptance criteria for bench testing performed for the predicate device were met and test results demonstrated that the predicate device met performance requirements for its intended use. No new issues of safety or effectiveness have been raised when compared to the predicate device. Prior bench testing of the AXERA 2 device included device/accessory functionality, deployment forces (heel, needle, plunger), release forces (heel), corrosion resistance testing (Latchwire/guidewire), guidewire resistance to fracture, Latchwire/guidewire resistance to flexing, flex conditioning (Latchwire), tensile strength of multiple joints (Latchwire, guidewire, anchor, heel, plunger, plunger tube, access needle, dilator adapter), compressive strength (handle/anchor, plunger lockout), access needle integrity, torque loading (handle/anchor), biocompatibility testing, preliminary animal studies (non-GLP) and cadaver assessments, as well as clinical investigations. Prior simulated use testing was performed on a cadaveric model and multiple clinical evaluations were conducted. The short term safety and clinical performance of the device were established. The long term safety, as well as the ability to access and re-access, was retrospectively studied in a smaller cohort of patients. In summary, the data provided herein demonstrate that the AXERA 2 Access System is substantially equivalent to its predicate in providing access to the arterial lumen and facilitating the introduction and placement of devices into the peripheral vasculature and promoting hemostasis as an adjunct to manual compression.
<sup>1</sup> The preliminary Animal Studies and Cadaver Assessments were conducted using prototypes of a similar design and configuration.
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized symbol resembling a bird or abstract human figure with outstretched arms, accompanied by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol. The logo is presented in black and white.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 28, 2014
Arstasis, Inc. Ms. Grace Li Director of Quality 740 Bay Road Redwood City, CA 94063
Re: K140201
Trade/Device Name: AXERA 2 Access System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1340 Regulation Name: Catheter Introducer Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DYB Dated: January 24, 2014 Received: January 27, 2014
Dear Ms. Li:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must or any I with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Grace Li
forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Image /page/3/Picture/7 description: The image shows the name "Kenneth J. Cavanaugh -S" in a bold, sans-serif font. The text is black against a white background. There is a logo in the background that is difficult to make out.
for
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{4}------------------------------------------------
Arsteris
## SECTION 1. INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known): Trade Name: AXERA 2 Access System Catheter Introducer Common Name: Indications For Use: The AXERA Access System is intended to provide access for the percutaneous introduction of devices into the peripheral vasculature and to promote hemostasis at the arteriotomy site as an adjunct to manual compression. AXERA is indicated for use in patients undergoing diagnostic femoral artery catheterization procedures using 5F or 6F introducer sheaths.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)
Kenneth J. Cavanaugh -S
Page of of
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.