K133851 · Alere Scarborough, Inc. · MYI · Sep 3, 2014 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K133851
Device Name
ALERE PBP2A SA/CONS CULTURE COLONY TEST
Applicant
Alere Scarborough, Inc.
Product Code
MYI · Microbiology
Decision Date
Sep 3, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.1640
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Alere™ PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test is a qualitative, in vitro immunochromatographic assay for the rapid detection of penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) in isolates identified as Staphylococcus aureus, as an aid in identifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
Device Story
Rapid immunochromatographic membrane assay; detects PBP2a protein in S. aureus isolates. Input: bacterial colonies sampled from culture plates (Tryptic Soy Agar, Columbia Agar, or Mueller-Hinton Agar). Process: isolates eluted into Reagent 1; Reagent 2 added; test strip inserted. Principle: recombinant monoclonal antibody fragments (rFabs) immobilized on nitrocellulose membrane bind PBP2a. Output: visual pink/purple line at 5 minutes. Used in clinical microbiology laboratories; operated by laboratory technicians. Results aid clinicians in identifying MRSA, facilitating appropriate antimicrobial therapy decisions.
Clinical Evidence
Multi-center clinical study (3 sites, 454 S. aureus isolates) compared the device to 30µg cefoxitin disk diffusion. Performance varied by plate type: Primary plates (100% sensitivity, 98.5% specificity), Tryptic Soy Agar (99.1% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity), Columbia Agar (98.6% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity), and Mueller Hinton (99.1% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity). Reproducibility study (3 sites, 6 operators) showed 100% agreement (600/600) across runs, sites, and operators.
Technological Characteristics
Immunochromatographic membrane assay. Components: nitrocellulose membrane, sample pad, conjugate pad, absorption pad. Reagents: rFabs and control antibody immobilized on membrane. Form factor: dipstick/test strip. Visual readout. No electronic components or connectivity. Sterilization: not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the qualitative detection of PBP2a in Staphylococcus aureus isolates to aid in the identification of MRSA. For prescription use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antimicrobial susceptibility test powder is a device that consists of an antimicrobial drug powder packaged in vials in specified amounts and intended for use in clinical laboratories for determining in vitro susceptibility of bacterial pathogens to these therapeutic agents. Test results are used to determine the antimicrobial agent of choice in the treatment of bacterial diseases.
Predicate Devices
Oxoid Penicillin-Binding Protein (PBP2a) Latex Agglutination Test (K011710)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K133851
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain substantial equivalence for the Alere™ PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test
C. Measurand:
Penicillin Binding Protein 2a (PBP2a) in isolates identified as *Staphylococcus aureus*
D. Type of Test:
The Alere PBP2a SA culture colony test is a rapid immunochromatographic membrane assay that uses monoclonal antibodies to detect the PBP2a protein directly from isolated colonies identified as *Staphylococcus aureus*
E. Applicant:
Alere Scarborough, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Alere™ PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test.
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
CFR 866.1640 – Antimicrobial susceptibility test powder
2. Classification:
II
3. Product code:
MYI - System, Test, Genotypic Detection, Resistant Markers, *Staphylococcus* Colonies
{1}
4. Panel:
83, Microbiology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The Alere™ PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test is a qualitative, *in vitro* immunochromatographic assay for the rapid detection of penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) in isolates identified as *Staphylococcus aureus*, as an aid in identifying methicillin-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* (MRSA).
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Alere™ PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test is a qualitative, *in vitro* immunochromatographic assay for the rapid detection of penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) in isolates identified as *Staphylococcus aureus*, as an aid in identifying methicillin-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* (MRSA).
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not applicable
I. Device Description:
The Alere™ PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test is a rapid immunochromatographic membrane assay intended for the detection of penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) in isolates identified as *Staphylococcus aureus* as an aid in the identification of MRSA. The test uses recombinant monoclonal antibody fragments (rFabs) to detect the PBP2a protein directly from bacterial isolates. The rFab and a control antibody are immobilized onto a nitrocellulose membrane as two distinct lines and combined with a sample pad, a pink/purple conjugate pad, and an absorption pad to form a test strip. Isolates are sampled directly from the culture plate and eluted into an assay tube containing Reagent 1. Reagent 2 is then added and the test strip is placed in the assay tube. Results are read visually at 5 minutes.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Oxoid Penicillin-Binding Protein (PBP2a) Latex Agglutination Test
{2}
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K011710
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | The Alere™ PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test is a qualitative, in vitro immunochromatographic assay for the rapid detection of penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) in isolates identified as Staphylococcus aureus, as an aid in identifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). | The test is a rapid latex agglutination assay, detecting PBP2' (also called PBP2a) in isolates of Staphylococcus, as an aid in identifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. |
| Analyte | PBP2a | Same |
| Specimen Type | Isolates identified as S. aureus | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Technology | A qualitative, in vitro immunochromatographic assay. | A rapid latex agglutination assay |
| Time to Results | 5 minute after sample preparation | Within 3 minutes after sample/test preparation |
| Performance | Compared to Cefoxitin (30 μg) Disk Diffusion (95% confidence intervals included in parenthesis) | Compared to NCCLS methods (95% confidence intervals included in parenthesis and estimated per performance values and known sample size in product insert) |
| | Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% Sheep Blood Plate: | |
| | S. aureus Isolates: Sensitivity: 99.1% (96.7%, 99.8%) Specificity: 99.2% (97.0%, 99.8%) | S. aureus Isolates: Sensitivity: 100% (94.7%, 100%) Specificity: 99.0% (95.8%, 99.9%) CoNS Isolates: Sensitivity: 96.5% (91.4%, 98.6%) Specificity: 100% (92.1%, 100%) |
| | Columbia Agar with 5% Sheep Blood Plate: | |
| | S. aureus Isolates: Sensitivity: 98.6% (96.0%, 99.5%) Specificity: 99.2% (97.0%, 99.8%) | S. aureus Isolates: Sensitivity: 100.0% (94.7%, 100.0%) Specificity: 100.0% (97.1%, 100%) |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | | CoNS Isolates:
Sensitivity: 99.5% (97.4%, 99.9%)
Specificity: 99.5% (97.3%, 99.9%) |
| | Mueller Hinton Plate: | |
| | *S. aureus* Isolates:
Sensitivity: 99.1% (96.7%, 99.8%)
Specificity: 99.6% (97.7%, 99.9%) | *S. aureus* Isolates:
Sensitivity: 100.0% (94.7%, 100.0%)
Specificity: 100% (97.1%, 100%)
**CoNS Isolates:**
Sensitivity: 95.6% (90.2%, 98.1%)
Specificity: 98.0% (88.4%, 99.6%) |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI M100-S24, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty Fourth Informational Supplement, 2014.
Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems; Guidance for Industry and FDA, 2009.
Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA: Establishing the Performance Characteristics of Nucleic Acid-Based In vitro Diagnostic Devices for the Detection and Differentiation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA), 2011.
## L. Test Principle:
Alere™ PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test is a rapid immunochromatographic membrane assay that uses recombinant monoclonal antibody fragments (rFabs) to detect the PBP2a protein directly from bacterial isolates. The rFab and a control antibody are immobilized onto a nitrocellulose membrane as two distinct lines and combined with a sample pad, a pink/purple conjugate pad, and an absorption pad to form a test strip.
Isolates are sampled directly from the culture plate and eluted into an assay tube containing Reagent 1. Reagent 2 is then added and the dipstick is placed in the assay tube. Results are read visually at 5 minutes based on the presence or absence of a pink/purple Sample Line. A pink/purple Control Line appears in the top half of the test strip in a valid assay.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
{4}
A reproducibility study was performed at three sites. Testing was done at three sites, using 18-24 hrs isolates that have been sub-cultured, by two operators in duplicates for five days. The reproducibility panel consists of six MRSA, and four MSSA; 10 isolates x 2 tests (duplicates) x 2 operators x 5 days x 3 sites = 600
Testing was done from each of the following media: Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood, and Mueller-Hinton Agar induced with a 30 µg Cefoxitin disk. There was 100% (600/600) agreement with expected test results.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
Not applicable.
Stability:
The following Product Stability Studies were performed to generate real time and accelerated stability data to support the expiration date of each lot under stated conditions.
The materials used in this study were as follows:
- Alere PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test Devices
- Alere PBP2a Culture Colony Test Reagent 1
- Alere PBP2a Culture Colony Test Reagent 2
Control Panel:
- S. aureus ATCC 43300 Positive Plate Control
- S. aureus ATCC 25923 Negative Plate Control
- S. epidermidis ATCC 35547 Positive Plate Control
- S. epidermidis ATCC 14990 Negative Plate Control
- Alere PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test QC Negative Control
- Alere PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test estimated Low Control
- Alere PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test estimated LOD Control
Stability conditions were set up as follows:
1. Accelerated – at 45°C and at 55°C
2. Real-Time at room temperature and at 30°C
{5}
Results are outlined in Table 1 below:
Transfer Lot 1 devices, Reagent 1 and Reagent 2 remained stable at 52 weeks of real time at 2-8°C and continued to hold after 40 weeks at 30°C, 20 weeks at 45°C and 10 weeks at 55°C. Transfer Lot 2 devices, Reagent 1, and Reagent 2 remained stable at 36 weeks at 2-8°C, 30°C, and continued to hold at 20 weeks at 45°C and 10 weeks at 55°C. See below Table 1 for Stability Summary.
Table 1: Stability Testing Summary
| Weeks of Stability at Various Temperatures | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot | 2-8°C | 30°C | 45°C | 55°C |
| Transfer lot 1 | 52 weeks | 40 weeks | 20 weeks | 10 weeks |
| Transfer lot 2 | 36 weeks* | 36 weeks* | 20 weeks | 10 weeks |
| Transfer lot 3 | 28 weeks* | 28 weeks* | 20 weeks | 10 weeks |
*Stability testing continues on these lots at the stated temperatures.
It is anticipated that the Alere PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test will have at least 12 months of stability.
Quality Control:
The Alere PBP2a SA culture colony test has built-in positive and negative procedural controls. The manufacturer recommends that these controls be included in each test run.
1. Procedural Controls
a. The appearance of a blue line at the "control line" position can be considered an internal positive procedural control. If capillary flow has occurred, this line will always appear.
b. In comparison to the color of the control line, the background color on the dipstick should be white within 5 minutes.
2. External Positive and Negative Controls:
The external controls tested during clinical and analytical testing are described in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Controls
| QC Organism | Expected Result | Result With Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| S. aureus ATCC 43300 | Positive | Positive |
| S. aureus ATCC 25923 | Negative | Negative |
During the clinical study, external positive and negative controls were used for each new lot and each day of testing.
{6}
A total of 130 positive and negative external controls were tested in the clinical study and demonstrated 100% concordance with the expected results.
In addition to the above QC organisms, the analytical study included additional supplemental positive and negative controls that were tested in triplicate on each day of testing with results interpreted by two operators. All positive and negative daily controls generated the expected results on each day of testing.
d. Detection limit:
A limit of detection study was conducted using Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC BAA44) and the detection limit was determined to be 7.3 x 10⁸ CFU/ml.
Table 3: Alere PBP2a SA Limit of Detection Results
| Staphylococcus species | Concentration (CFU/ml) | # Detected per Total Tests | % Detected |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S. aureus (ATCC BAA44) | 7.30 x 10⁸ | 19/20 | 95% |
e. Analytical reactivity and specificity:
A total of 162 strains of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 112 strains of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) were tested with the Alere PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test from each of the following media: Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood, and Mueller-Hinton Agar induced with a 30 μg Cefoxitin disk and all tests showed the expected results.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
A clinical study was conducted at three geographically diverse sites throughout the United States including Alere.
A total of 454 S. aureus fresh isolates were tested from each of the following media: Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood, Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood and Mueller-Hinton Agar induced with a 30 μg Cefoxitin disk. Results were compared to those of 30 μg Cefoxitin disk diffusion, according to Clinical and laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretation. Alere PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test performance, including 95% confidence intervals, versus Cefoxitin disk diffusion, stratified by plate type is provided in Table 4 below.
{7}
8
Table 4: Summary of Performance Characteristics by Plate Type:
| Plate Type | Sensitivity
(# positive/total) | 95% C. I. | Specificity
(# negative/total) | 95% C.I. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Primary Plate^{1} | 100% (129/123) | (97.1, 100.0) | 98.5% (134/136) | (94.8, 99.6) |
| Tryptic Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood | 99.1% (213/215) | (96.7%, 99.8%) | 99.2% (237/239) | (97.0%, 99.8%) |
| Columbia Agar with 5% sheep blood | 98.6% (212/215) | (96.0%, 99.5%) | 99.2% (237/239) | (97.0%, 99.8%) |
| Mueller Hinton with 30 μg Cefoxitin Induction | 99.1% (213/215) | (96.7, 99.8%) | 99.6% (238/239) | (97.7%, 99.9%) |
¹Alere test was performed from primary plates at 2 out of 3 clinical sites. Primary plates were either Tryptic Soy Agar or Columbia Agar, with the exception of two samples of unknown plate type.
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The sponsor conducted the Cefoxitin disk screen test as the reference method for detecting resistant strains of Staphylococci. Cefoxitin disk at concentration of 30 μg is a surrogate for oxacillin resistance and is used in the clinical studies. The CLSI recommendations are:
Table 5: Interpretive Criteria for 30μg Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Test
| Interpretive Criteria (zone diameter in mm) for 30 μg Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Test | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Oxacillin Susceptible | Oxacillin Resistant |
| S. aureus and S. lugdunensis | ≥22 mm | ≤21 mm |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Refer to Table 4 (above).
b. Clinical specificity:
Refer to Table 4 (above).
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
{8}
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.