K133695 · Gemss Medical Systems Co., Ltd. · KPR · Aug 7, 2014 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K133695
Device Name
TITAN 11
Applicant
Gemss Medical Systems Co., Ltd.
Product Code
KPR · Radiology
Decision Date
Aug 7, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1680
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system for generation of x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This device is not intended for mammography.
Device Story
TITAN 11 is a stationary high-frequency inverter radiographic system used in clinical settings by healthcare professionals. It captures X-ray images using an SSXI detector, X-ray generator, and collimator. The system includes a detector stand, tube stand, mobile table, and power supply. The X-view 4 software processes raw detector data to produce 16-bit grayscale TIFF images for diagnostic review. Operators use a PC-based interface to manage patient worklists, adjust exposure parameters (kVp, mA, mAs, time), and perform image corrections (window/level, marking, cropping). The system supports DICOM 3.0 for PACS integration. By providing high-resolution diagnostic images, the device assists clinicians in examining anatomical regions to support clinical decision-making and patient diagnosis.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical image review performed by a radiologist with credentials equivalent to US board certification. Images from the subject and predicate devices were compared in accordance with FDA guidance for solid-state imaging devices. The radiologist concluded that the TITAN 11 provides images of equivalent diagnostic capability to the predicate device.
Indicated for diagnostic x-ray imaging of various anatomical regions in patients. Not indicated for mammography.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
Predicate Devices
KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM, MODEL 8791345 (K051258)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
August 7, 2014
Gemss Medical Systems Co., Ltd. % Mr. Dave Kim Medical Device Regulatory Affairs Mtech Group 8310 Buffalo Speedway HOUSTON TX 77025
Re: K133695
Trade/Device Name: TITAN 11 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1680 Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KPR Dated: July 15, 2014 Received: July 22, 2014
Dear Mr. Kim:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,

for
Janine M. Morris Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
### Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: December 31, 2013 See PRA Statement on last page.
510(k) Number (if known) K133695
Device Name Stationary X-ray System / TITAN 11
Indications for Use (Describe)
TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system for generation of x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This device is not intended for mammography.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
[X] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
#### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
#### FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
Image /page/2/Picture/13 description: The image shows a signature in black ink. The signature appears to be cursive and somewhat stylized. The background is plain white, which makes the signature stand out. The signature is likely from a document or piece of artwork.
{3}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# SECTION 07
# 510(k) SUMMARY
{5}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) SUMMARY For TITAN 11
#### Submitted bv:
GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. Address - 61,Dunchon-daero 541(obaeksasibil), Jungwon-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Telephone -- +82-31-764-7321~3 Fax - +82-31-764-7324 Contact - Mr. Sangwoo Lee Internet – http://www.gemss-medical.com
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR Part 807.92.
Date: July, 17th, 2014
1. General Information:
Establishment: GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. 61, dunchon-daero 541 beon-gil jungwon-gu seongnam-si, KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 468-865 Registration Number: 3003384390
GMESS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. is the holder/owner for this 510(k).
US Agent: John W. Lee United Radiology Systems, Inc 151 s. pfingsten rd. unit t deerfield, IL 60015 Phone: 847 2910999 ext Fax: 847 2911090 Email: johnlee@united-radiology.com
2. Official Correspondent Contact:
Dave Kim Mtech Group 8310 Buffalo Speedway Houston, TX 77025 TEL : 713-467-2607
FAX : 713-583-8988
E-mail : davekim@mtech-inc.net
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### 3. Device name and Classification
| Trade Name | : TITAN 11 |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
| Classification Name | Stationary X-ray System |
| Classification Panel | : Radiology |
| Classification Regulation | : 21 CFR 892. 1680 |
| Device Classification | : Class II |
| Product Code | : KPR |
#### 4. Legally Marketed Predicated Device
| Trade Name | : KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM, MODEL 8791345 |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Clearance # | : K051258 |
| Clearance date | : 06/01/2005 |
| Classification Name | : Stationary X-ray System |
| Classification Panel | : Radiology |
| CFR Section | : 21CFR 892.1680 |
| Device Class | : Class II |
| Product Code | : KPR |
#### 5. Device Description
TITAN 11, the high frequency inverter type of Radiographic system is operated by the built-in operation program. TITAN 11 digital X-ray imaging system is to be used to take and store image for diagnosis of patients. It consists of the SSXI detector, X-ray Generator, X-ray Collimator, PC, Detector Stand, Tube Stand, Mobile Table, PU-30(Power Supply) and viewing software. Optional devices include AEC, DAP, Hand or Foot Exposure Switch.
#### 6. Indications for Use
The TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system for generation of x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This device is not intended for mammography.
#### 7. Substantial Equivalence
TITAN 11 and components are conforms to the FDA recognized standards as like the predicate device. Based on the recognized standard conformity evidences related to electro-, mechanical-, software-, clinical-, and risk management, it is confirmed that TITAN 11 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
| ITEM | Contents | GEMSS MEDICAL<br>(Model TITAN 11) | Predicate device<br>(K051258) | SE-# |
|---------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| Indications for use | | The TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system<br>for generation of x-rays<br>for examination of various anatomical<br>regions. This device is | The KODAK DirectView DR<br>7500 system is a<br>permanently installed<br>diagnostic X-ray system<br>for generation of X-ray for<br>examination of various | same |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| | | not intended for<br>mammography. | anatomical regions. | |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|------|
| Software | Name | X-view 4 | KODAK direct view<br>EVP software | SE-1 |
| DICOM<br>compatibility | DICOM 3.0 | DICOM 3.0 compliance | DICOM 3.0 compliance | Same |
| TFT Detector | Detector type | CsI | CsI | Same |
| | Pixels | 3008 (v) x 3072 (v) | 3000 x 3000 | |
| | Output data | 16 bit gray scales tiff | 16,384 capture; 4,096<br>gray levels output | SE-2 |
| | Spatial resolution<br>(DIGITAL<br>SYSTEM) | 3.4 lp/mm | 3.5 lp/mm | |
| X-ray Generator | Application | DR-Digital radiography | DR-Digital radiography | same |
| | Description | 40kW | 80kW | SE-3 |
| | AEC | Yes | Yes | same |
| X-ray Tube | Anode Heat<br>Content<br>(Heating Unit) | 140kHU | 400kHU | SE-4 |
| PC | General purpose<br>PC | YES | YES | same |
| Detector STAND | U-D movements<br>(At center) | 350~1,800mm(1450m<br>m, 40mm/sec) :<br>1400mm more than. | 47 (18.5) table; 152.4<br>(60) wall | |
| Mobile Table | Table top<br>dimensions<br>(L x W) | 2000X700mm | 2200X868mm | SE-5 |
| | Table lock | wheel lock | Mechanical lock | |
| | Maximum patient<br>weight | 300kg | 342kg | |
### 8. Difference Discussion
| SE-# | SE discussion |
|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SE-1 | TITAN 11 software (X-view 4.1) receives patient information from work-list, and<br>corrects images, and transfers the information to PACS same as the predicate<br>device. A series of process for communication is same as well. TITAN 11 software<br>has all functions that predicate device has, including patient information editing,<br>input value adjustment (ex. kVp, mA, mAs, Time), and image correction such as<br>W/L, Marking, Crops and so on. Therefore the software programs used in the new<br>and predicated device are substantially equivalent. |
| SE-2 | Image pixels size and spatial resolution are similar with the predicate device. The<br>differences are not significant in terms of the overall quality of patient image<br>acquisition. TITAN 11 has more number of pixels than the predicate. The<br>performance specification, specifically spatial resolution, of Titan 11 is better than<br>the predicate, and this does not raise any new concern for safety and effectiveness. |
{8}------------------------------------------------
| SE-3 | The generation capacity of proposed device is lower than the predicate device.<br>Even though the capacity is lower, the conclusion of the radiologist's review<br>demonstrates compatible image quality using short/long scale contrast control<br>processing method. While the X-ray generation capacity is lower than the predicate<br>device, the exposure time for the subject device may be set longer than predicate<br>device for compatible image quality compared to the predicate device. |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SE-4 | The anode heating unit of the subject device is lower than the predicate device.<br>This issue is related to the overheating problem. The proposed device is able to<br>shoot successively240 times per minute without over heating which is lower than<br>that of predicate device. However, it is deemed sufficient and acceptable within the<br>hospital / clinic operating parameter. Therefore this does not raise new safety. |
| SE-5 | The predicate device table is available for "Ceiling, Wall Stand, up/down", TITAN 11<br>is composed of tube stand, detector stand, mobile table. TITAN 11 has less<br>restriction than the predicate in terms of spacing. Both TITAN 11 and the predicate<br>provide various patient positions for radiographic exposure, such as standing, lying,<br>and sitting. |
9. Summary of the technological characteristics of the device compared to the predicate device:
The indications for use, mechanical components, performances and safety characteristics of Titan 11 described in this 510(k) are similar to those of the predicate device.
The primary differences are the specifications of X-ray tube, and X-ray generator of the subject device. The pixel matrix for the subject device is higher than that of the predicate device while the X-ray generator and X-ray tube anode heat content (Heating Unit) for the new device are smaller than those of the predicate device. However, as demonstrated by the clinical image review by an expert, both devices are capable of generating quality radiographs sufficient for patient diagnosis.
The image quality of radiographs depends on various factors including the pixel size of the detector, KVp, mA and X-ray exposure time. As demonstrated in the clinical image review report, the technological characteristics of the subject device as well as its superior pixel matrix are more than adequate to obtain radiographs with compatible image quality compared to the predicate device.
These differences do not have an effect on safety and effectiveness compared to the predicate device.
#### 10. Performance Testing/Data
Testing for verification and validation of the device was found acceptable to support the claims of substantial equivalence. Safety compliance checking (including EMC, and so on) was evaluated according to the IEC Standards. GMESS MEDICAL SYSTEMS Co., Ltd certifies conformance to Voluntary Standards covering electrical and Mechanical safety. In conclusion, the identified risk of electrical hazards was mitigated and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in terms of safety and effectiveness.
#### 10.1 Description of non-clinical tests.
The proposed device(TITAN11) has undergone electromagnetic compatibility testing, as well as software validation and risk analysis.
Compliance evidences were submitted for the following standards:
- A IEC 60601-1: Test Report issued by 300 party testing lab
{9}------------------------------------------------
- IEC 60601-1-2: Test Report issued by 3" party testing lab
IEC 60601-1-3: Test Report issued by 3" party testing lab A
- A
- IEC 60601-2-54: Test Report issued by 3rd party testing lab A
- A IEC 62304: Software development DHF package by GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, Co., Ltd.
- A EPRC Standard: 21 CFR 1020.30 and 31: In-house Test Report issued by GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS. Co., Ltd.
- > ISO 14971: Risk management file by GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS. Co., Ltd.
10.2 Description of clinical tests.
Clinical images from both the subject and the predicate devices were obtained in accordance with the FDA Guidance Document on Solid State Imaging Devices and the clinical images were evaluated by a radiologist with credentials equivalent to a US board certification. The evaluation of the qualified radiologist in the study shows that TITAN 11 provides images of equivalent diagnostic capability to the predicate device. It demonstrates that TITAN 11 is substantially equivalent with the predicate device.
- 11. Conclusion as to Substantial Equivalence
TITAN11 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM (K051258). These 2 devices are same or very similar in the intended use, the design principle, the performance and the applicable standards. Some characteristics, for example, their appearance, the user interfaces and the capacity of X-ray generator and X-ray tube are different. However the compliance reports, performance demonstrations and description of clinical review result in this submission STED provide demonstration that these differences do not raise any new questions of safety and effectiveness. Therefore, GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. concludes TITAN 11 is substantially equivalent with the predicate device KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM (K051258).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.