K133652 · Wallac Oy, A Subsidiary of Perkinelmer, Inc. · JIA · Apr 28, 2014 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K133652
Device Name
GSP NEONATAL TOTAL GALACTOSE KIT
Applicant
Wallac Oy, A Subsidiary of Perkinelmer, Inc.
Product Code
JIA · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Apr 28, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1310
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Real-World Evidence, Pediatric
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K133652 · Apr 28, 2014
GSP NEONATAL TOTAL GALACTOSE KIT
Wallac Oy, A Subsidiary of Perkinelmer, Inc.
Leftover routine newborn screening samples; Retrospective clinical samples from newborns diagnosed with Galactosemia
The sponsor evaluated the screening performance of the GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit by comparing results against a predicate device using a large cohort of routine clinical samples and confirmed positive retrospective cases.
Newborn screening; Routine clinical samples; Retrospective cohort; Public health laboratory
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Screening study at state public health laboratory; Retrospective performance evaluation using routine clinical samples
Newborns (routine screening samples and confirmed Galactosemia cases); Sample Size: 2165 (2159 routine samples + 6 confirmed Galactosemia samples); Number of Sites: 1
Predicate device (Neonatal Total Galactose kit)
Screening performance (percent agreement) and percentile-based cut-off evaluation
Indications for Use
The GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit is intended for the quantitative determination of total galactose (galactose and galactose-1-phosphate) concentrations in blood specimens dried on filter paper as an aid in screening newborns for galactosemia using the GSP® instrument.
Device Story
The GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit is an in vitro diagnostic assay for screening newborns for galactosemia. It utilizes a fluorescent galactose oxidase enzymatic method to measure total galactose (galactose and galactose-1-phosphate) in dried blood spot specimens. The device is designed for use with the automated GSP instrument. The assay involves extracting galactose from blood spots, which is then processed via enzymatic reaction to produce a fluorescent signal measured at 505 nm excitation and 580 nm emission. The GSP instrument automates the assay process, replacing manual fluorometric methods. Healthcare providers use the quantitative results to identify newborns requiring further diagnostic testing for galactosemia. The system provides a reportable range of 1.15–50 mg/dL, aiding in early clinical intervention for affected infants.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study conducted at a U.S. state public health laboratory using 2,314 samples (6 confirmed galactosemia, 2,308 routine). Compared GSP kit to predicate device across three cut-offs (99.5th, 99.0th, 95th percentiles). Overall percent agreement ranged from 96% to 99.3%. All 6 confirmed galactosemia cases were correctly identified as screen-positive by both devices.
Indicated for the quantitative determination of total galactose (galactose and galactose-1-phosphate) in dried blood spot specimens as an aid in screening newborns for galactosemia.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A galactose test system is a device intended to measure galactose in blood and urine. Galactose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of the hereditary disease galactosemia (a disorder of galactose metabolism) in infants.
Predicate Devices
Wallac Oy Neonatal Total Galactose Kit (k071649)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k133652
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Galactose and galactose-1-phosphate
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, fluorescent galactose oxidase method
E. Applicant:
Wallac Oy
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1310 - Galactose test system
2. Classification:
Class I, reserved
3. Product code:
JIA
4. Panel:
Chemistry
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit is intended for the quantitative determination of total galactose (galactose and galactose-1-phosphate) concentrations in blood specimens dried on filter paper as an aid in screening newborns for galactosemia using the GSP® instrument.
2. Indication(s) for use:
See intended use above.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only, presumptive positive screening results for Galactosemia require confirmatory diagnostic or follow-up testing.
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use on the GSP instrument only.
I. Device Description:
The GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit contains sufficient reagents to perform 1152 assays. The kit contains the following components:
- Calibrators have been prepared from human red blood cells enriched with galactose, and with ProClin 300 as preservative. The hematocrit value is 50 - 55 % to correspond to a hematocrit of a newborn. The calibrators have been calibrated against primary calibrators gravimetrically prepared using a U.S. Pharmacopeia Reference Standard Preparation for galactose. 6 levels of calibrators are included: A – 0.5 mg/dL, B – 2.5 mg/dL, C – 5.0 mg/dL, D – 10.0 mg/dL, E – 20 mg/dL, F – 50 mg/dL
- Controls have been prepared from human blood enriched with galactose and galactose-1 phosphate, and with ProClin 300 as preservative. Prior to dispensing the blood onto the filter paper, the hematocrit value of blood used in the controls preparation is adjusted to 50 - 55 % to correspond to a hematocrit of a newborn. The low control is approximately 4.0 mg/dL and the high control approximately 12 mg/dL.
- Neonatal Total Galactose Assay Reagent 1 (trehalose, N-(2-acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (ACES), 10-Acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, horseradish peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase from bovine erythrocytes) – 3 lyophilized vials
- Neonatal Total Galactose Assay Reagent 2 (cupric sulfate (< 0.02 %), trehalose, ACES, galactose oxidase from Dactylium dendroides, and alkaline phosphatase from bovine intestine.) – 3 lyophilized vials
- Neonatal Total Galactose Assay Buffer (ACES and ProClin® 300) – 3 bottles, 40 ml
{2}
- Neonatal Total Galactose Assay Reconstitution Solution (dimethyl sulfoxide and water)– 1 bottle, 20 ml
- Neonatal Extraction Solution (zinc sulfate (< 2 %) and 2-propanol (~40 %)) – 1 bottle, 60 ml
All human source materials used in the preparation of kit components were tested and found to be non-reactive for the presence of HBsAg, anti-HIV 1 and 2, and HCV by FDA approved methods.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Wallac Oy Neonatal Total Galactose Kit
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s): k071649
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate (k071649) |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | Is intended for the quantitative determination of total galactose (galactose and galactose-1-phosphate) concentrations in blood specimens dried on filter paper as an aid in screening newborns for galactosemia. | Same |
| Test Methodology | Enzymatic assay | Same |
| Detection Method | Fluorescence – measured at 505 nm and 580 nm wavelengths | Fluorescence – measured at 340 nm and 405 nm wavelengths |
| Instrument Platform | GSP instrument, automated (originally reviewed under k090846) | Fluorometer, manual |
| Sample Type | Dried blood spot | Same |
| Calibrators | A – 0.5 mg/dL
B – 2.5 mg/dL
C – 5.0 mg/dL
D – 10.0 mg/dL
E – 20 mg/dL
F – 50 mg/dL | A – 0 mg/dL
B – 1.5 mg/dL
C – 4.0 mg/dL
D – 9.0 mg/dL
E – 18 mg/dL
F – 40 mg/dL |
| Reportable Range | 1.15 – 50 mg/dL | 1.3 – 40 mg/dL |
{3}
4
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI document EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline
CLSI Guideline EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach
CLSI Protocol EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
CLSI Protocol EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation
CLSI Protocol EP9-A: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
L. Test Principle:
The Neonatal Total Galactose assay measures total galactose, i.e. both galactose and galactose-1-phosphate, using a fluorescent galactose oxidase method. The fluorescence is measured using an excitation wavelength of 505 nm and an emission wavelength of 580 nm. The following illustration summarizes the reactions that occur during the assay procedure:
| Gal-1-P + H₂O | AP | Gal + P |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Gal + O₂ | GAO | GHD + H₂O₂ |
| ADHP + H₂O₂ | HRP | Resorufin* + H₂O |
Gal-1-P = Galactose-1-phosphate
AP = Alkaline phosphatase
Gal = Galactose
P = Phosphate
GAO = Galactose oxidase
GHD = D-galacto-hexadialdose
ADHP = 10-Acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine
HRP = Horseradish peroxidase
* = Fluorescent
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
{4}
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The study was performed using three lots of the GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit, three operators, and three GSP instruments in 54 runs on 21 operating days using 7 dried blood spot samples. The samples PS2-PS7 were prepared by spiking galactose and galactose-1-phosphate with equimolar concentrations into heparinized whole blood. In PS1 washed human red blood cell concentrate was used to minimize endogenous total galactose. The hematocrit value of the blood used in the sample preparation was adjusted to $40 - 55\%$ and dried blood spots were prepared. The precision of GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit were calculated with a full calibration curve in duplicate for each plate. Two plates were used with 4 replicates of each sample tested. Precision results are summarized in the tables below:
| Sample | n | Mean TGAL (mg/dL) | Within run | | Within lot | | Between lot | | Total variation | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV % | SD | CV % | SD | CV % | SD | CV % |
| PS1 | 216 | 3.13 | 0.34 | 10.7 | 0.37 | 11.9 | 0.07 | 2.2 | 0.38 | 12.1 |
| PS2 | 216 | 5.15 | 0.43 | 8.3 | 0.48 | 9.2 | 0.06 | 1.1 | 0.48 | 9.3 |
| PS3 | 216 | 8.61 | 0.69 | 8.0 | 0.81 | 9.4 | 0.20 | 2.4 | 0.83 | 9.7 |
| PS4 | 216 | 11.8 | 0.98 | 8.3 | 1.16 | 9.8 | 0.39 | 3.3 | 1.22 | 10.3 |
| PS5 | 216 | 16.8 | 1.39 | 8.3 | 1.73 | 10.3 | 0.64 | 3.8 | 1.84 | 11.0 |
| PS6 | 216 | 32.2 | 2.70 | 8.4 | 3.35 | 10.4 | 1.59 | 4.9 | 3.70 | 11.5 |
| PS7 | 216 | 45.6 | 3.60 | 7.9 | 5.85 | 12.8 | 2.62 | 5.8 | 6.41 | 14.1 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The claimed measuring range for the GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit is 1.15 - 50 mg/dL based on the Limit of Quantitation (see d. below) and Linearity studies.
The linearity was assessed in this study following the principles described in CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline. The study used one kit lot and one GSP instrument. A full calibration curve in duplicate was included in the plate. Each sample and control were measured in four replicates, the samples were positioned in a random order on the plate.
The samples used were dried blood spot specimens prepared from heparinized whole blood. Blood drawn from one apparently healthy adult represented a "high activity" sample. The hematocrit value of the blood was adjusted to $40\% - 55\%$ to correspond to the hematocrit of neonates. This unspiked blood represented a "low concentration" sample. A part of the blood was separated and equimolar concentrations of galactose and galactose-1-phosphate were added to obtain a "high concentration" total galactose sample. Samples with intermediate concentrations were prepared by mixing the "low concentration" TGAL sample with the "high concentration" sample.
{5}
A polynomial evaluation of linearity was used for the data analysis.
The significance of the second and third order polynomials were evaluated by performing a t-test. The regression analysis results showed that the second order polynomial had statistically significant non-linear terms (β2). Thus, the second order model was compared with the linear model.
The measured TGAL concentrations are compared to the expected concentrations. A regression analysis was performed (measured vs. expected TGAL concentration), the fitted regression model is:
$$
y = 0.96x - 1.11 \left(R^{2} = 0.99\right)
$$
where $y$ = Measured TGAL concentration (mg/dL)
and $x$ = Expected TGAL concentration (mg/dL).
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability: There is no available internationally accepted reference material or a reference method for total galactose. The calibration of the GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit has been traceable to the in-house reference calibrator series (primary calibrators). The reference calibrator series include six levels, A-F, as dried blood spots on filter paper. The reference calibrators have been manufactured using adult human blood (endogenous biotinidase activity in serum) and washed red blood cells as blood matrices.
Value assignment: The in-house reference materials of the GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit include primary calibrators, secondary calibrators, level calibrators 1-4, QA controls Low and High "component" stage calibrators (Component Calibrators) and controls (Component QC) and, final "kit configuration" or combination assignment of the kit calibrators (Kit Cals) and kit controls (Kit QC). The primary calibrators are used to monitor the level of secondary calibrators and level calibrators. An initial primary calibrator lot is prepared adding gravimetrically determined amounts of Galactose to human red blood cell matrix (washed red blood cell concentrate in sucrose solution). The final concentrations of the manufactured GSP Neonatal Total Galactose primary calibrators are based on gravimetrically determined amounts of added galactose taking into account the endogenous level of the blood suspension. Kit calibrators and controls are value-assigned using an internal procedure, with testing using multiple replicates on multiple instruments
Kit calibrator contains 6 levels of calibrators: A - 0.5 mg/dL, B - 2.5 mg/dL, C - 5.0 mg/dL, D - 10.0 mg/dL, E - 20 mg/dL, and F - 50 mg/dL.
Kit control contains 2 levels of controls: Level 1 = 4.0 mg/dL, Level 2 = 12.0 mg/dL.
6
{6}
Stability: The results of the accelerated and real time stability studies support a shelf life of at least 12 months for all components of GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit, when stored at +2 to +8°C (Assay Reagent 1, Assay Reagent 2, Assay Buffer, Reconstitution Solution and Extraction Solution) or at -30 to -16°C (kit calibrators and controls). After opening, the Kit Calibrators and Controls should be stable at 2 to 8°C for 7 days. Neonatal Extraction Solution can be stored on-board in the reagent storage carousel of the GSP instrument for up to 14 days. Assay Reagent 1, Assay Reagent 2 and Assay Buffer can be stored on-board in the reagent storage carousel of the GSP instrument for up to 7 days. Microplates with punched calibrators and controls in wells can be stored on-board in the GSP instrument plate storage for 12 hours.
Stability testing protocols and acceptance criteria for stability testing has been reviewed and found to be acceptable.
Sample stability: The objective of this sample stability study was to determine the short term stability of dried blood spot specimens spiked with galactose and/or galactose-1-phosphate. The test was performed using different storage conditions.
The sample stability study was performed using one GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit lot and two GSP instruments. At the zero time point each sample was analyzed in 16 replicates (4 replicates per plate) and in the other 5 time points (1, 5, 7, 9, and 14 days) each sample was analyzed in 8 replicates (4 replicates per plate).
The nine samples were dried blood spot specimens prepared from heparinized human whole blood spiked with either a.) galactose b.) galactose-1-phosphate or c.) equal molar concentrations of galactose and galactose-1-phosphate. The zero time point samples were analyzed immediately after the overnight drying while the samples for the other 5 time points were stored after the overnight drying in various storage conditions. The sample stability is better at 2 to 8°C than 21°C and 35°C, if samples are protected from moisture.
d. Detection limit:
The objective of the study was to determine the Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) for the GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit. The analysis of the LoB, LoD and LoQ were performed in accordance with CLSI document EP17-A, Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline.
The LoB study was performed using two lots, the LoQ / LoD study was performed using three lots of the GSP TGAL kit and three GSP instruments.
Limit of the Blank (LoB): The samples for LoB study were dried blood spots specimens prepared from washed red blood cells in sodium chloride-sucrose solution. The samples were subjected to short term stressful environmental conditions to
7
{7}
decrease the endogenous total galactose concentrations of the samples and stored long term in -16°C – -30°C. The hematocrit value was adjusted to 40-55% and dried blood spots were prepared.
The samples were measured with two GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit lots using two GSP instruments. Each plate included a full calibration curve in duplicate and the results were analyzed using a plate specific calibration curve. LoB was calculated based on 150 repeated measurements of five blank samples per one kit lot. Specifically, repeated measurements (n = 60/sample) were carried out for the blank (analyte free) dried blood spot samples on filter paper. The Kit Controls Low and High, in quadruplicates (n = 4), were included in each plate and used for run acceptance. The five LoB samples were assayed with six replicates in ten separate runs performed over five operating days.
The LoB for total galactose is 0.34 mg/dL (19 μmol/L), defined as the 95th percentile of a distribution of blank samples.
**Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ):** The samples for the LoD/LoQ study were prepared from washed human red blood cells in sodium chloride-sucrose solution by spiking with equimolar galactose and galactose-1-phosphate. The hematocrit value was adjusted to 40-55% to correspond to the hematocrit of neonates. The LoD/LoQ samples were spotted on to Whatman 903 filter paper (75 μL/spot), dried overnight at room temperature in a fume hood and stored at -16°C – -30°C in sealed bags with desiccant. The LoD/LoQ samples were measured with three GSP Total Galactose kit lots using three GSP instruments. Repeated measurements (n = 216) were carried out using four low level DBS. Each plate included a full calibration curve in duplicate and the results were analyzed using a plate-specific calibration curve and a calibration curve for the batch of two plates. The Kit Controls Low and High in quadruplicate (n = 4) were included in each plate and used for run acceptance. Altogether 27 runs were assayed during 20 operating days using three GSP instruments and three GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit lots.
The LoQ is 1.15 mg/dL (64 μmol/L), defined as the lowest concentration with a total CV equal to or less than 20%.
The sponsor’s claimed measuring range of the device is 1.15 – 50 mg/dL.
e. Analytical specificity:
The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of potential interfering substances in dried blood spot samples on the measurement of GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit. The interference study was performed in accordance with the principles described in CLSI Guideline EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline. The study used one kit lot and one GSP instrument.
The samples were dried blood spot specimens prepared from heparinized whole blood
8
{8}
spiked with equimolar concentrations of galactose and galactose-1-phosphate. Three clinically relevant total galactose concentrations (5, 10 and 15 mg/dL) were used. The hematocrit level was adjusted to 40-55% to correspond to the hematocrit of neonates. The control pools were prepared adding equal volume of solvent (without the interfering substances) to the base pool as was added to create the test pools. A paired-difference test was performed for the potential interfering substances. Both test and control pools were analyzed within one analytical run with 12 replicates for all substances. A bias exceeding ±15% is considered a significant interference. The tested compounds are listed in the following table:
| Tested substance | Concentration with ≤15% interference |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 2.75 mg/dL |
| Ampicillin | 152 μmol/L |
| Ascorbate | 6 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (conjugated) | 16.6 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (unconjugated) | 20 mg/dL |
| D-fructose | 18 mg/dL |
| D-glucose | 1000 mg/dL |
| D-mannose | 100 mg/dL |
| Glutathione | 3 mmol/L |
| HSA | 30 mg/mL |
| Hemoglobin | 102 g/L |
| Intralipid | 250 mg/dL |
| NADH | 100 μmol/L |
The sponsor's packages insert states:
Intralipid was found not to interfere up to added concentrations of 250 mg/dL at 5 and 10 mg/dL total galactose; and up to 375 mg/dL at 15 mg/dL total galactose. When present above these amounts Intralipid may cause a false positive screening result for a specimen with measured total galactose concentration close to the cut-off value.
In addition, hemoglobin in combination with elevated bilirubin concentration of 15 mg/dL was found to interfere with the assay by increasing the measured total galactose concentration (see the table below). Therefore, hemoglobin level at 198 g/L and above in combination with elevated bilirubin level may cause a false positive screening result for a specimen with measured total galactose concentration close to the cut-off value.
Hematocrit levels from 30% to 66% (Hemoglobin levels 102–230 g/L) were found not to interfere at total galactose concentrations of 5, 10 and 15 mg/dL.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
{9}
10
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A method comparison study was performed to compare the candidate device (GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit) to the predicate device (Neonatal Total Galactose kit). A total of 141 dried blood spot specimens, including newborn patient routine sample and adult whole blood dried specimens spiked with galactose and galactose-1-phosphate were used in the study analysis. The weighted Deming regression of the data yields the following equation:
$$y = 1.16x - 0.49; 95\% \text{ CI: slope (1.07; 1.26), intercept (-0.73; -0.25), } N = 141$$
The slope showed an approximate bias of 16% between the candidate device and the predicate device; however, the purpose of this device modification was to adjust the calibration to better align with the CDC reference sample concentration target levels. Therefore, test results from the candidate device do not, and are not expected to, directly correlate with test results from the predicate device.
A clinical study (see Section M.3.c below) was conducted to evaluate the screening performance between the candidate device and the predicate device using their respective cut-offs values. The screening performance of both devices is similar (see tables below) and found to be acceptable. The clinical screening performance, not the method comparison results, was the basis of the substantial equivalence determination.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. This assay only uses neonatal dried blood spots on filter paper.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Screening study at state public health laboratory: A study to evaluate the screening performance of the GSP Neonatal Total Galactose kit compared to the predicate device was conducted at a U.S. state public health laboratory that routinely performs newborn screening. The sample results for six retrospective samples from newborns
{10}
diagnosed with Galactosemia and 2159 leftover routine newborn samples were included in the study. Two GSP instruments and one kit lot of the new device were used.
All the assayed specimens, i.e. the routine specimens and retrospective confirmed galactosemia positive specimens, were classified as screen positive or screen negative based on the measured galactose concentrations. The classification was performed using 99.5%, 99.0% and 95.0% percentile based cutoffs (see values in the table below).
| | N | Min | Max | Mean | Median | 99.5% | 99.0% | 95% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GSP | 2314 | 1.15 | 17.3 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 10.5 | 8.5 | 5.6 |
| Predicate | 2314 | 1.3 | 40 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 11.7 | 9.4 | 5.9 |
Screening results:
| Summary of accuracy – 99.5th percentile (All specimens) | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Predicate device | | | |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| GSP | Positive | 10* | 9 | 19 |
| | Negative | 8 | 2293 | 2301 |
| | total | 18 | 2302 | 2320 |
Overall percent agreement = (10+2293)/2320 x 100% = 99.3%
| Summary of accuracy – 99th percentile (All specimens) | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Predicate device | | | |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| GSP | Positive | 16* | 14 | 30 |
| | Negative | 14 | 2276 | 2290 |
| | total | 30 | 2290 | 2320 |
Overall percent agreement = 98.8%
| Summary of accuracy – 95th percentile (All specimens) | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Predicate device | | | |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| GSP | Positive | 82* | 45 | 127 |
| | Negative | 47 | 2146 | 2193 |
| | total | 129 | 2191 | 2320 |
Overall percent agreement = 96%
* The six samples from newborns confirmed to have Galactosemia were screen positive with both the predicate and the GSP Neonatal Galactose kit with all three cut-offs (see below). The remaining samples were from unaffected newborns (false positives).
{11}
12
Results for the neonatal samples from confirmed Galactosemia patients:
| Specimen no. | Predicate device (mg/dL) | GSP Neonatal Galactose (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 19.2 | 29 |
| 2 | 23.9 | 17 |
| 3 | 20.4 | 25.2 |
| 4 | 37.5 | >50 |
| 5 | 30.8 | 31.4 |
| 6 | >40 | >50 |
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Total galactose values by percentile from the testing of routine screening specimens completed with the GSP Neonatal Galactose kit at a state U.S. laboratory:
| | N | Min | Max | Mean | Median | 99.5% | 99.0% | 95% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GSP Neonatal Galactose (mg/dL) | 2314 | 1.15 | 17.3 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 10.5 | 8.5 | 5.6 |
In the labeling the manufacturer recommends that each laboratory should establish its own reference range and cut-off.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.