The Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 chemistry analyzer is an automated clinical analyzer for in vitro diagnostic use only in clinical laboratories. It is intended to be used for a variety of assay methods. The analyzer provides in vitro quantitative determinations for glucose, sodium, potassium, and chloride in serum and plasma samples. The Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose Reagent is for use with the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer for the measurement of glucose in serum and plasma. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. The Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Kit is intended to be used with the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer for measurement of sodium, potassium, and chloride in serum and plasma. The ISE Kit consists of ISE Buffer, internal reference solution, and reference solution. Sodium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases involving electrolyte imbalance. Potassium measurements monitor electrolyte balance and in the diagnosis and treatment of disease conditions characterized by low or high blood potassium levels. Chloride measurements are used for the diagnosis and treatment of electrolyte and metabolic disorders. The Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Calibrator Kit consists of Calibrator 1, Calibrator 2, and Selectivity Check. It is used with the ISE Module on the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer for the calibration of the Sodium, Potassium and Chloride assays. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
Device Story
Automated clinical chemistry analyzer; processes serum/plasma samples; utilizes photometric and ion-selective electrode (ISE) modules. Input: patient samples; reagents. Operation: random access; sampling/dispensing arm; incubation; wash station. Glucose measured via hexokinase method (NADH production measured at 340 nm). Electrolytes measured via crown ether (Na+, K+) and PVC membrane (Cl-) electrodes; potential translated via Nernst Equation. Output: quantitative concentration values for glucose, Na+, K+, Cl-. Used in clinical laboratories; operated by laboratory personnel. Results used by clinicians for diagnosis/treatment of metabolic/electrolyte disorders. Benefits: high-throughput automated testing; standardized diagnostic monitoring.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; substantial equivalence established through bench testing and performance validation of assay accuracy, precision, and linearity compared to established clinical chemistry methods.
Technological Characteristics
Automated clinical chemistry analyzer; utilizes Ion Selective Electrode (ISE) technology for electrolyte measurement and enzymatic/colorimetric methods for glucose. System is a standalone laboratory instrument. Software manages automated sample handling, calibration, and data processing. No specific materials or connectivity standards provided.
Indications for Use
Indicated for in vitro quantitative determination of glucose, sodium, potassium, and chloride in serum and plasma samples in clinical laboratories. Used for diagnosis/treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders (diabetes, neonatal hypoglycemia, pancreatic islet cell carcinoma) and electrolyte/metabolic disorders.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A discrete photometric chemistry analyzer for clinical use is a device intended to duplicate manual analytical procedures by performing automatically various steps such as pipetting, preparing filtrates, heating, and measuring color intensity. This device is intended for use in conjunction with certain materials to measure a variety of analytes. Different models of the device incorporate various instrumentation such as micro analysis apparatus, double beam, single, or dual channel photometers, and bichromatic 2-wavelength photometers. Some models of the device may include reagent-containing components that may also serve as reaction units.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number: k133519
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, and Glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Photometric and Ion Selective Electrode
E. Applicant:
Carolina Liquid Chemistries, Corp.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer
Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose Reagent
Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Calibrator Kit
Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Kit
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JJE | I | 862.2160, analyzer, chemistry (photometric, discrete) for clinical use | 75-Chemistry |
| JGS | II | 862.1665, Sodium Test System | 75-Chemistry |
| CEM | II | 862.1600, Potassium Test System | 75-Chemistry |
| CGZ | II | 862.1170, Chloride Test System | 75-Chemistry |
| CFR | II | 862.1345, Glucose Test System | 75-Chemistry |
| JIX | II | 862.1150, Calibrators | 75- Chemistry |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer
The Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 chemistry analyzer is an automated clinical analyzer for in vitro diagnostic use only in clinical laboratories. It is intended to be used for a variety of assay methods. The analyzer provides in vitro quantitative determinations for glucose, sodium, potassium, and chloride in serum and plasma samples.
Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose Reagent
The Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose Reagent is for use with the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer for the measurement of glucose in serum and plasma. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Kit
The Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Kit is intended to be used with the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer for measurement of sodium, potassium, and chloride in serum and plasma. The ISE Kit consists of ISE Buffer, internal reference solution, and reference solution. Sodium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases involving electrolyte imbalance. Potassium measurements monitor electrolyte balance and in the diagnosis and treatment of disease conditions characterized by low or high blood potassium levels. Chloride measurements are used for the diagnosis and treatment of electrolyte and metabolic disorders.
Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Calibrator Kit
The Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Calibrator Kit consists of Calibrator 1, Calibrator 2, and Selectivity Check. It is used with the ISE Module on the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer for the calibration of the Sodium, Potassium and Chloride assays. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer
{2}
I. Device Description:
Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer
The Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 is an automated clinical analyzer for in vitro diagnostic use in clinical laboratories. It is designed for in vitro quantitative determination of general clinical chemistries in serum and plasma samples. The device consists of the software, a carousel system for both reagents and samples, an internal cooling unit, a sampling/dispensing arm assembly, an incubation assembly, and a wash station. The CLC 6410 also includes an ISE Module. The ISE module consists of ion selective electrodes for sodium, potassium, and chloride, a reference electrode, and accessory reagents available in the ISE Kit (ISE Buffer, ISE Internal Reference, and ISE Reference Solution).
Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose Reagent
The Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose reagent is ready to use. The composition of the Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose Hexokinase Reagent is as follows: G-6-PD (L. mesenteroides), 17000 U/L; Hexokinase (yeast), 850 U/L; ATP, 1.0 mmol/L: NAD, 1.5 mmol/L.
Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Kit
ISE kit contains the following ingredients:
ISE Buffer: Tris
ISE internal reference solution: Tris, Sodium Chloride, Potassium Chloride, and Calcium Chloride
ISE Reference solution: Tris, Sodium Chloride, Potassium Chloride, and Calcium Chloride
Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Calibrator Kit
The ISE Calibrator Kit consists of two calibrator levels (level 1 and 2) and a Selectivity Check (Quality Control for the Calibration) with the following ingredients, respectively:
Calibrator 1: Sodium Chloride, Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate, and Sodium Bicarbonate
Calibrator 2: Sodium Chloride, Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate, and Sodium Bicarbonate
Selectivity Check: Freeze-dried powder: Sodium Chloride, Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate, Sodium Bicarbonate; Dissolved liquid: Albumin.
Calibrator 1 and 2 are supplied ready for use. The Selectivity Check components require preparation.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Olympus AU 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
Derma Media Lab Glucose Reagent
Phoenix ISE Reagents for Olympus AU Series
{3}
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K981743
K970664
K020148
3. Comparison to predicate
Instrument comparison:
| Items | Candidate Device: Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 Chemistry Analyzer | Predicate Device: Olympus AU 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer (K981743) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarity/Difference | | |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative measurements of Glucose, Na+ (Sodium), K+ (Potassium), and Cl- (Chloride) in serum and plasma samples. | Same |
| Setting | Clinical laboratory use only | Same |
| Power | 220V 50 Hz | AC 208 V 50/60 Hz |
| Analytical Methods | Endpoint, fixed-time, kinetic | Same |
| Calibration Methods | Linear calibration and nonlinear calibration | Same |
| Throughput (Max) | 1600 photometric tests per hour; 1800 tests/hour with integrated ISE; 2200 or 2800 tests/hour with independent ISEs | Maximum 400 (800 including ISE) tests per hour; 200 samples/hour analyzing only ISE |
| Calibration / QC | Automatic and Manual calibration / QC | Same |
| Bar code | Yes | Optional |
| Photometer wave length | 340-800 (13 wavelengths) | Same |
| Linear Absorbance Range | 0-3.3 Absorbance | 0-3 Absorbance |
| Reaction Cuvettes | Reusable rigid optical plastic cuvette | Square, glass cuvette |
| Reaction Volume | 150-450 μl | 90-350 μl |
| Sample type | Serum and plasma | Serum |
{4}
ISE reagent kit comparison:
| Items | Candidate Device: Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Kit | Predicate Device: Phoenix ISE Reagents for Olympus AU Series (K020148) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarity/Difference | | |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative measurements of sodium, potassium and chloride in serum and plasma. | Same |
| Sample size | 45ul | 20ul |
| Measuring range | Na = 102 to 173
K = 3 to 10
Cl = 70 to 150 | Na = 100 to 180
K = 3 to 10
Cl = 70 to 150 |
| Reagent Stability | Unopened: Unopened ISE Buffer, ISE Internal Reference Solution and ISE Reference Solution are stable until expiry date when stored at 10-30°C. On board, the reagents are stable for 12 days. | Unopened: date of expiry at 2-25°C. Internal Reference is stored at 15-25°C. Buffer and Reference solutions are stable for 90 days when opened and stored in the ISE compartment of the analyzer. After opening, Internal Reference Solution may be stored at 15-25 °C for up to 90 days. |
ISE calibrator kit comparison:
| Items | Candidate Device: Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE Calibrator Kit | Predicate Device: Phoenix ISE Reagents for Olympus AU Series (K020148) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarity/Difference | | |
| Intended Use | For the calibration of sodium, potassium and chloride. | Same |
| Calibrator Stability | Unopened calibrators and selectivity check are stable until expiration date when stored at 2-8°C. Once opened, Calibrator 1 and Calibrator 2 are stable for 12 days when stored at 2-8°C. The Selectivity Check is stable for 5 days when stored at 2-8°C. | Unopened calibrators and selectivity check are stable until expiry date when stored at 2-25°C. After opening, the Low serum standard, High serum standard, and the Na+/K+ |
{5}
6
| | | Selectivity Check may be stored at 2-25°C for up to 90 days, provided the cap is replaced immediately after each use. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Calibrator levels | 2-point; Calibrator 1 (low), Calibrator 2 (high)
Selectivity Check (QC) | Same |
Glucose reagent comparison:
| Items | Candidate Device: Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose Reagent | Predicate Device: Derma Media Glucose Reagent (K970664) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarity/Difference | | |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative measurement of glucose in serum and plasma. | Same |
| Test Principle | Hexokinase | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum and Plasma | Serum |
| Measuring range | 13 to 700 mg/dL | Same |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP9-A2-IR: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-Second Edition
CLSI EP10-A2: Preliminary Evaluation of Quantitative Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures – Second Edition.
CLSI EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation; Approved Guideline
{6}
L. Test Principle:
Glucose measurement is based on the hexokinase method. Glucose is phosphorylated by hexokinase and excess adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in the presence of magnesium ions to glucose-6-phosphate. Glucose-6-phosphate is oxidized in the presence of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PDH) to 6-phosphogluconate and NADH which is measured at 340 nm and is proportional to the amount of glucose present in the sample.
Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, and chloride) are measured based on ion selective electrodes principles. The Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE module employs crown ether membrane electrodes for sodium and potassium and a molecular oriented PVC membrane for chloride that are specific for each ion of interest in the sample. An electrical potential is developed according the Nernst Equation for a specific ion. When compared to a reference, this electrical potential is translated into voltage and then into the ion concentration of the sample.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-run precision was evaluated using four levels of serum based controls (commercially available) and tested in one run with 20 replicates. Total precision was evaluated over a total of twenty days, 20 replicates per run and two separate runs per day for a total of 800 measurements.
Within-run and total precision results are summarized in the below tables.
Precision Performance: Glucose Serum Measurements (mg/dL)
| Analyte | | Within Run | | | Total Precision | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose | Sample | Mean | SD | %CV | Mean | SD | %CV |
| | Control 1 | 66.2 | 0.77 | 1.2 | 66.4 | 1.7 | 2.6 |
| | Control 2 | 99.4 | 1.02 | 1.0 | 102.7 | 3.46 | 3.4 |
| | Control 3 | 364.2 | 4.48 | 1.2 | 363.5 | 6.39 | 1.8 |
| | Control 4 | 563.2 | 5.88 | 1.0 | 561.3 | 9.08 | 1.6 |
Precision Performance: ISE-Serum Sodium (Na⁺, mmol/L)
| Analyte | | Within Run | | | Total Precision | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Na+ | Sample | Mean | SD | %CV | Mean | SD | %CV |
| | Control 1 | 146.6 | 0.70 | 0.5 | 145.9 | 1.04 | 0.7 |
{7}
8
| | Control 2 | 135.7 | 0.66 | 0.5 | 136.1 | 0.92 | 0.7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Control 3 | 119.5 | 2.84 | 2.4 | 123.7 | 1.85 | 1.5 |
| | Control 4 | 158.9 | 0.39 | 0.2 | 159.0 | 1.15 | 0.7 |
Precision Performance: ISE-Serum Potassium (K⁺, mmol/L)
| Analyte | | Within Run | | | Total Precision | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K+ | Sample | Mean | SD | %CV | Mean | SD | %CV |
| | Control 1 | 3.03 | 0.06 | 2.0 | 2.96 | 0.08 | 2.6 |
| | Control 2 | 4.68 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 4.60 | 0.06 | 1.2 |
| | Control 3 | 5.84 | 0.11 | 2.0 | 5.98 | 0.09 | 1.6 |
| | Control 4 | 6.63 | 0.05 | 0.7 | 6.71 | 0.12 | 1.7 |
Precision Performance: ISE-Serum Chloride (Cl⁻, mmol/L)
| Analyte | | Within Run | | | Total Precision | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cl⁻, | Sample | Mean | SD | %CV | Mean | SD | %CV |
| | Control 1 | 100.3 | 0.61 | 0.6 | 100.3 | 0.66 | 0.7 |
| | Control 2 | 94.7 | 058 | 0.6 | 94.2 | 0.65 | 0.7 |
| | Control 3 | 84.7 | 2.07 | 2.4 | 86.1 | 0.95 | 1.1 |
| | Control 4 | 118.0 | 0.35 | 0.3 | 118.2 | 1.37 | 1.2 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
**Glucose:**
A linearity range from 13 to 721 mg/dL (8 levels) was analyzed using commercially available linearity standards with five replicates of each level on the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410. Results were analyzed by the Least Squares Statistical Method using EP evaluator (see table below).
**Sodium:**
A linearity range from 102-173 mmol/L (5 levels) was analyzed using commercially available linearity standards with five replicates of each level on the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410. Results were analyzed by the Least Squares Statistical Method using EP evaluator (see table below).
**Chloride:**
A linearity range from 58 -167 mmol/L (5 levels) was analyzed using commercially available linearity standards with five replicates of each level on the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410. Results were analyzed by the Least Squares Statistical Method using EP evaluator (see table below).
**Potassium:**
A linearity range from 1.8 -12.6 mmol/L (5 levels) was analyzed using commercially available linearity standards with five replicates of each level on the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410. Results were analyzed by the Least Squares Statistical Method using EP evaluator (see table below).
{8}
Linearity Results:
| Measurand | Slope | Intercept | R² | Sample Range Tested | Claimed Measuring Range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 1.010 | 1.26 | 1.000 | 13 to 721 | 13-700 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 0.976 | 2.67 | 0.987 | 102-173 | 102-173 |
| Chloride (mmol/L) | 0.997 | 0.15 | 1.000 | 58 -167 | 70-150 |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | 0.990 | 0.043 | 0.994 | 1.8 -12.6 | 3-10 |
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
# ISE Calibrators and Selectivity Check
Traceability: Carolina Liquid Chemistries ISE calibrators and Selectivity Check are traceable to NIST SRM 956C.
Stability: Real time stability studies were performed. The study protocol and acceptance criteria were found acceptable. Results of the study support the shelf life of 12 months at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Once opened, Calibrator 1 and 2 are stable for 12 days when stored on-board at $2^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . The Selectivity Check is stable for 5 days when stored on-board at $2^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ .
Value assignment for the ISE calibrators: Each calibrator is value assigned using the average of 10 measurements following internal protocols.
Target values and ranges:
| | Target Value | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Calibrator 1 | Calibrator 2 | Selectivity Check |
| Na+ (mmol/L) | 120 | 160 | 138 ± 1 |
| K+ (mmol/L) | 3 | 7 | 4.1 ± 0.1 |
| Cl- (mmol/L) | 80 | 120 | 102 ± 1 |
# Glucose
Traceability: Carolina Liquid Chemistries Glucose assay is traceable to NIST 917b.
The sponsor recommends the use of Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 720 serum calibrator (previously cleared under in k053153) for the calibration of the glucose assay.
{9}
# d. Detection limit:
Refer to the linearity study data above in M. 2.b. for the linearity results used to support the measuring range of all analytes. In addition, the sponsor conducted a Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) for Glucose assay according to the CLSI EP-17A guideline. Results are summarized in the table below.
| Measurand | LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glucose (Serum) (mg/dL) | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
The sponsor claims the following measuring ranges:
| Measurand | Measuring range |
| --- | --- |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 13-700 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 102-173 |
| Chloride (mmol/L) | 70-150 |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | 3-10 |
# e. Analytical specificity:
Effects of common endogenous substances including bilirubin, hemoglobin and triglycerides were evaluated by spiking serum pools with increasing amounts of interferents at two analyte levels. In addition, chemical additives, including Ascorbic acid and lithium heparin was evaluated for potential interference. The effect of drugs were not tested and has been referenced in the product insert to the "Young, D.S., Effects of Drugs on Clinical Laboratory Tests, 3rd ed. AACC Press, Washington, D.C., 1990, p.3 168, p. 3-180."
The sponsor defined significant interference as a bias of $>10\%$ between the spiked and unspiked sample. The tested results are summarized below:
# Glucose
No significant interference was observed with Triglycerides up to $425\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , Bilirubin levels at $25\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , Hemoglobin levels at $500\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and Ascorbic Acid levels at $30\mathrm{mg / L}$ for either the normal glucose level or abnormal glucose level. No significant interference was observed with Lithium Heparin levels or EDTA levels up to $80\mathrm{U / mL}$ for either the normal or abnormal glucose level.
# Sodium
No significant interference was observed with Triglycerides up to $537.8\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , Bilirubin levels at $25\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , Hemoglobin levels at $500\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , and Ascorbic Acid levels at $30\mathrm{mg / dL}$ for either the normal or abnormal sodium levels. No significant
{10}
interference was observed with Lithium Heparin levels up to 80 U/mL for either the normal or abnormal sodium level.
## Chloride
No significant interference was observed with Triglycerides up to 537.8 mg/dL, Bilirubin levels at 25 mg/dL, Hemoglobin levels at 500 mg/dL, and Ascorbic Acid levels at 30 mg/dL for either the normal or abnormal chloride levels. No significant interference was observed with Lithium Heparin levels up to 80 U/mL for either the normal or abnormal chloride level.
## Potassium
No significant interference was observed with Triglycerides up to 537.8 mg/dL, Bilirubin levels at 25 mg/dL, and Ascorbic Acid levels at 30 mg/dL for either the normal or abnormal potassium levels. No significant interference was observed with Lithium Heparin levels up to 80 U/mL for either the normal or abnormal potassium level.
Because of the known interference of hemolysis on potassium, sponsor has the following limitation stated in the labeling: "Hemolyzed samples should not be used with this assay." In addition, sponsor also states that grossly lipemic samples should not be used with this assay.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
## 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Method comparison studies were conducted following CLSI EP9- A2. Separate comparison studies were performed for both serum and li-heparin plasma samples. Samples were analyzed on the Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC 6410 versus the Olympus AU 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer. Some samples were altered (spiked or diluted) in order to span the entire claimed measuring range. The study result are summarized in the below table.
| Test | Sample type | Total # samples | Sample Range tested | Claimed measuring range | Slope | Intercept | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Glu mg/dL | Serum | 66 | 14-638 | 13-700 | 0.977 | 3.50 | 0.9989 |
| | Plasma | 60 | 17-675 | 13-700 | 0.996 | -0.09 | 0.9998 |
| Na+ | Serum | 60 | 109-171 | 102-173 | 0.992 | 1.04 | 0.9963 |
{11}
| mmol/L | Plasma | 60 | 106-170 | 102-173 | 0.988 | 1.88 | 0.9896 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K+ mmol/L | Serum | 60 | 3.0-9.5 | 3-10 | 1.008 | -0.025 | 0.9990 |
| | Plasma | 60 | 3.0-9.9 | 3-10 | 0.987 | 0.032 | 0.9995 |
| Cl- mmol/L | Serum | 66 | 73-140 | 70-150 | 0.941 | 5.69 | 0.9917 |
| | Plasma | 60 | 73-147 | 70-150 | 0.988 | 0.83 | 0.9945 |
b. Matrix Comparison:
Matrix effect has been evaluated through separate method comparison studies using both serum and Li-heparin plasma samples. Please see item above in M. 2.a. The sponsor concluded that Lithium heparin plasma is acceptable to be used with the ISE and glucose assays.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor has provided the following Expected Values in the labeling:
Glucose: Serum/Plasma 74-106 mg/dL
Sodium: Serum/Plasma 136.0-145.0 mmol/L
Chloride: Serum/Plasma 98.0-107 mmol/L
Potassium: Serum 3.5-5.1 mmol/L; Plasma- (Male):3.5-4.5 mmol/L, (Female): 3.4-4.4 mmol/L
References:
Tietz NW, editor: Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, 6th ed., WB Saunders Co., PA, 2008.
{12}
N. Instrument Name:
Carolina Liquid Chemistries CLC6410 Chemistry Analyzer
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Random access instrument with ISE Module.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ x ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
Bar code identification
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Random access and stat mode operation. Samples are loaded on sample disk.
5. Calibration:
Glucose
An on-board calibration stability was performed on the Glucose Assay. The result supports 30 days without recalibration or adding new reagent.
ISE
Calibration should be performed every day and with each new lot of reagent.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor recommends on their labeling that “The validity of the reaction should be monitored by use of control samples with known normal and abnormal values. These controls should be run after each calibration and with every working shift in which assays are performed. It is recommended that each laboratory establish their own frequency of control. Each user should follow the state and local guidelines regarding the quality control procedures”.
13
{13}
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
A carry-over study has been performed and found to be acceptable.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10, and 21 CFR 801.109(b)(1).
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
14
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.