i-STAT Total beta-hCG Test, i-STAT Total beta-hCG Controls, i-STAT Total beta-hCG Calibration Verification Materials
K133002 · Abbott Point of Care, Inc. · DHA · Apr 16, 2015 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K133002
Device Name
i-STAT Total beta-hCG Test, i-STAT Total beta-hCG Controls, i-STAT Total beta-hCG Calibration Verification Materials
Applicant
Abbott Point of Care, Inc.
Product Code
DHA · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Apr 16, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1155
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The i-STAT® Total Beta-Human Chorionic (B-hCG) test is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative and qualitative determination of ß-hCG in venous whole blood or plasma samples using the i-STAT 1 Analyzer Systems. The test is intended to be used as an aid in the early detection of pregnancy and is for prescription use only. The i-STAT® Total B-hCG Controls are used to monitor performance of the i-STAT Total β-hCC test. The i-STAT® Total B-hCG Calibration Verification Materials are used to verify the calibration of the i-STAT Total BhCG test throughout the reportable range.
Device Story
The i-STAT Total ß-hCG test is a point-of-care diagnostic cartridge used with the i-STAT 1 Analyzer. It utilizes a two-site enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) with electrochemical detection. Monoclonal antibodies specific to the ß-hCG subunit are localized on an electrochemical sensor chip; a reference sensor is included for signal normalization. During operation, the sample is introduced to the cartridge, where simultaneous capture and labeling occur using an alkaline phosphatase-linked monoclonal antibody. The analyzer measures the electrochemical signal generated by the enzyme-substrate reaction. Results are displayed to the clinician to aid in pregnancy detection. The system provides rapid quantitative results from whole blood or plasma, facilitating immediate clinical decision-making at the point of care.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated via precision (CLSI EP05-A2), linearity (CLSI EP06-A), interference (CLSI EP07-A2), and method comparison (CLSI EP09-A2) against predicate. Precision studies (N=75 per level) showed CVs ranging from 4.3% to 18.7%. Method comparison (N=134) showed high correlation (r=0.99) with predicate. No clinical sensitivity/specificity studies performed.
Technological Characteristics
Two-site enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) on a disposable cartridge. Sensing principle: electrochemical detection of alkaline phosphatase-linked antibody signal. Sample: venous whole blood or plasma. Connectivity: i-STAT 1 Analyzer. Reportable range: 5.0–2000.0 IU/L. Controls/Calibration materials: assayed human serum.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative and qualitative determination of β-hCG in venous whole blood or plasma to aid in early pregnancy detection. For prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for the early detection of pregnancy is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine. A human chorionic goadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for any uses other than early detection of pregnancy (such as an aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of treatment of persons with certain tumors or carcinomas) is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k133002
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Total beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) in venous whole blood and plasma
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Abbott Point of Care, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
i-STAT® Total Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (β-hCG) Test
i-STAT® Total β-hCG Controls
i-STAT® Total β-hCG Calibration Verification Materials
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1155, Human chorionic gonadotropin test system
21 CFR 862.1660, Quality Control Material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II – Test System
Class I, Reserved – Quality Control material
3. Product code:
DHA – Test system
JJX – Control material
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
{1}
2
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The i-STAT® Total Beta human Chorionic Gonadotropin (β-hCG) test is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative and qualitative determination of β-hCG in venous whole blood or plasma samples using i-STAT 1 Analyzer Systems. The test is intended to be used as an aid in the early detection of pregnancy and is for prescription use only.
The i-STAT® Total β-hCG Controls are used to monitor performance of the i-STAT Total β-hCG test.
The i-STAT® Total β-hCG Calibration Verification materials are used to verify the calibration of the i-STAT Total β-hCG test throughout the reportable range.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
i-STAT 1 analyzers (models 300 and 300W)
I. Device Description:
Each i-STAT Total β-hCG assay cartridge includes a sample inlet, sensors to detect the total β-hCG (see test principle below), and the necessary reagents needed to perform the test (shown in the table below). The i-STAT Total β-hCG Controls and Calibration Verification Materials are designed for use with the assay system. The cartridge contains a buffer and preservatives.
| Component | Biological Source |
| --- | --- |
| Anti - hCG Antibody/ Alkaline Phosphatase Conjugate | Murine IgG : Bovine Intestine |
| IgG | Murine IgG |
| IgM | Murine IgM |
| Sodium Aminophenyl Phosphate | N/A |
| Heparin | Porcine Intestine |
{2}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Abbott ARCHITECT® Total β-hCG assay
Cliniqa Beta HCG Control Level 1, 2, 3
Cliniqa Beta HCG Calibration Verification Control Level 1, 2, 3
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k983424
k121237
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Characteristics | APOC i-STAT Total β-hCG test (Candidate k133002) | Abbott ARCHITECT Total β-hCG assay (Predicate k983424) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | The i-STAT® Total Beta human Chorionic Gonadotropin (β-hCG) test is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative and qualitative determination of β-hCG in venous whole blood or plasma samples using i-STAT 1 Analyzer Systems. The test is intended to be used as an aid in the early detection of pregnancy and is for prescription use only. | Same except intended for serum and plasma samples |
| Assay Methodology | Two site ELISA | Same |
| Enzyme Detection | Electrochemical | Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay |
| Reportable Range | 5.0-2000 IU/L undiluted | 1.2-15,000 IU/L undiluted |
| Samples | Sodium and Lithium Heparin whole blood and Sodium and Lithium Heparin plasma | Serum and Heparin or EDTA Plasma |
{3}
| Characteristic | i-STAT Total β-hCG Controls and i-STAT Total β-hCG Calibration Verification Material (Candidate k133002) | Cliniqa Beta HCG Control Level 1, 2, 3 and Cliniqa Beta HCG Calibration Verification Control Level 1, 2, 3 (Predicate k121237) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | The i-STAT® Total β-hCG Controls are used to monitor performance of the i-STAT Total β-hCG test.
The i-STAT® Total β-hCG Calibration Verification Materials are used to verify the calibration of the i-STAT Total β-hCG test throughout the reportable range. | Same |
| Matrix | Human serum with added buffer stabilizers, and purified human hormones | Same |
| Traceability | WHO 5^{th} International Reference Standard, 07/364 | WHO 4^{th} International Reference Standard, 75/589 |
| Form | Liquid | Same |
| Open Vial Stability | 30 days | Same |
| Values | Specific for each lot | Same |
| Stability | Opened: 30 days at 2-8 °C
Shelf Life: 3 years at 2-8 °C | Same |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI EP05-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods
- CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures
- CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
- CLSI EP09-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
- CLSI EP12-A2: User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance
- CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures
- CLSI C28-A3c: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory
- CLSI I/LA30-A: Immunoassay Interference by Endogenous Antibodies
L. Test Principle:
The i-STAT Total β-hCG assay test cartridge uses a two-site enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) method. Antibodies specific for hCG are located on an electrochemical sensor fabricated on a silicon chip. Also deposited in another location on the sensor silicon chip is an antibody/alkaline phosphatase enzyme conjugate specific to a separate portion of
{4}
the human chorionic gonadotropin molecule. The whole blood or plasma sample is brought into contact with the sensors allowing the enzyme conjugate to dissolve into the sample. The hCG within the sample becomes labeled with alkaline phosphatase and is captured onto the surface of the electrochemical sensor during an incubation period of approximately seven minutes. The sample, as well as excess enzyme conjugate, is washed off the sensors. Within the wash fluid is a substrate for the alkaline phosphatase enzyme. The enzyme bound to the antibody/antigen/antibody sandwich cleaves the substrate, releasing an electrochemically detectable product. The electrochemical (amperometric) sensor measures this enzyme product, which is proportional to the concentration of hCG within the sample. The default setting on the handheld is a display of the quantitative hCG value as well as a qualitative interpretation of the hCG test result. The handheld can be customized to disable or enable the qualitative hCG interpretation.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Two separate precision studies were performed at the point of care (POC). In the first study using spiked lithium heparinized whole blood, all target concentrations were evaluated at the same three POC sites. In the second study for lithium heparinized plasma samples, the 5 IU/L target concentration was evaluated at 3 different POC sites compared to the other evaluated plasma concentrations. Analyses were based on CLSI EP5-A2.
For plasma samples, precision studies were conducted over 5 days on five analyzers, yielding 25 replicates per sample/level across 3 sites for each concentration level (total N=75 per sample concentration level). Results are shown in the Table below:
Reproducibility at 3 POC sites for plasma samples:
| Target Concentration | N | Mean (IU/L) | Within-Day | | Within-Site | | Overall | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 5 IU/L | 75 | 5.5 | 0.75 | 13.61 | 0.88 | 16.05 | 1.03 | 18.7 |
| 25 IU/L | 75 | 24.3 | 1.26 | 5.16 | 1.26 | 5.16 | 1.26 | 5.18 |
| 1150 IU/L | 75 | 1155.7 | 49.76 | 4.31 | 50.77 | 4.39 | 53.08 | 4.59 |
| 1875 IU/L | 75 | 1874.5 | 104.95 | 5.60 | 104.95 | 5.60 | 111.11 | 5.93 |
For whole blood sample evaluations, at each POC site, 21 replicates were tested for each whole blood sample. The 21 replicates included 3 replicates for each of 7 analyzers at each POC site. Results are shown below:
Reproducibility for whole blood samples:
| Target Concentration | POC site #1, N=21 | | | POC site #2, N=21 | | | POC site #3, N=21 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | mean | SD | %CV | mean | SD | %CV | mean | SD | %CV |
| 5 IU/L | 75 | 5.5 | 0.75 | 13.61 | 0.88 | 16.05 | 1.03 | 18.7 | 1.03 |
| 25 IU/L | 75 | 24.3 | 1.26 | 5.16 | 1.26 | 5.16 | 1.26 | 5.18 | 1.26 |
| 1150 IU/L | 75 | 1155.7 | 49.76 | 4.31 | 50.77 | 4.39 | 53.08 | 4.59 | 53.08 |
| 1875 IU/L | 75 | 1874.5 | 104.95 | 5.60 | 104.95 | 5.60 | 111.11 | 5.93 | 111.11 |
{5}
All blood or plasma sample results with a measured hCG concentration $< 5$ IU/L will be reported as “ $< 5$ IU/L” by the test system.
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
# Linearity study:
A study was performed to demonstrate that the i-STAT Total $\beta$ -hCG assay is linear across the claimed measuring interval of 5.0 IU/L to 2000.0 IU/L. Lithium heparinized whole blood and plasma samples from 6 donors were spiked with a primary spiking solution prepared from WHO $5^{\text{th}}$ IS (07/364). Nine hCG levels/samples with concentrations well-distributed across the range (from 4.9 IU/L to $>2000$ IU/L) were prepared by admixing according to recommendations in CLSI EP06-A. Replicate samples $(N \geq 10)$ were tested on multiple i-STAT 1 Analyzers.
Analyses demonstrated linearity across the claimed measuring interval of 5.0 IU/L to 2000.0 IU/L. The linear regression analysis results are:
Whole blood: $y = 1.04x + 0.69$ , $r = 0.9901$
Plasma: $y = 0.92x - 0.35$ , $r = 0.9929$
# Recovery study
A dilution recovery study was performed using lithium heparinized whole blood and plasma samples from six donors. Each donor sample was then mixed with a primary spiking solution prepared from WHO $5^{\text{th}}$ IS (07/364) to prepare 9 levels of samples, which were then tested on at least ten assay cartridges. Percent recovery or absolute bias was calculated at each level as shown below:
| Level | Whole Blood | | | Plasma | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean (expected) | Mean (observed) | % recovery or absolute bias | Mean (expected) | Mean (observed) | % recovery or absolute bias |
| 1 | 1936.4 | 1974.6 | 102.0 % | 1972.6 | 1811.5 | 91.8 % |
| 2 | 972.7 | 989.3 | 101.7 % | 986.5 | 895.5 | 90.8 % |
| 3 | 644.8 | 677.4 | 105.1 % | 657.5 | 622.1 | 94.6 % |
| 4 | 484.2 | 509.5 | 105.2 % | 493.3 | 475.0 | 96.3 % |
| 5 | 242.2 | 261.4 | 107.9 % | 246.9 | 234.1 | 94.8 % |
| 6 | 121.3 | 128.2 | 105.7 % | 123.5 | 109.2 | 88.4 % |
| 7 | 60.6 | 62.9 | 103.8 % | 61.8 | 54.5 | 88.2 % |
| 8 | 24.3 | 26.6 | 109.5 % | 24.8 | 22.6 | 91.0 % |
| 9 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 0.7 IU/L | 5.3 | 4.5 | 0.8 IU/L |
{6}
For whole blood samples with hCG concentrations >5 IU/L, the individual % recovery ranged from 91.1% to 118.5%, and for plasma samples from 81.8% to 103.3% when compared to WHO hCG 5th IS. For whole blood samples with hCG at a concentration of ~5 IU/L, the individual bias ranged from 0.3 to 1.1 IU/L, and for plasma samples from -0.2 to -1.2 IU/L, when compared to WHO hCG 5th IS.
The sponsor has a limitation in their labeling that states "End-users may obtain individual results with >15% negative bias for plasma samples when hCG concentrations are >5 IU/L".
## Hook effect evaluation:
The assay was evaluated for high dose hook effect in lithium heparinized plasma and whole blood samples. Samples were spiked to high levels of hCG using commercially available hCG. Each sample was diluted into the measuring interval of the i-STAT Total β-hCG assay and results were multiplied by the dilution factor in order to assign the actual concentration of the sample being tested. Seven samples with hCG levels ranging from 100,000 to >600,000 IU/L were evaluated.
The Sponsor defines a sample unaffected by hook as a sample that produced a signal greater than the signal produced by a sample at 2000 IU/L (such that the i-STAT Analyzer would indicate a result of “>2000.0 IU/L”). Plasma samples with hCG concentrations up to 450,000 IU/L showed no hook effect. Whole blood samples with hCG concentrations up to 650,000 IU/L showed no hook effect.
## c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
### Traceability:
The measurands in the Controls and Calibration Verification Materials are traceable to the WHO 5th International Standard (NIBSC Code 07/364). The traceability process is based on EN ISO17511.
### Stability and Value Assignment:
Stability and value assignment of Controls and Calibration Verification Materials was previously reviewed under k121237. Control materials have target concentrations of 25, 1000, and 1500 IU/L. Calibration Verification Materials have target concentrations of 3, 1000, and 2000 IU/L.
## d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD), and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) were determined in accordance with CLSI document EP17-A2. The LoB study was performed by measuring 195 replicates of one blank lithium heparin plasma pool and 144 replicates of one blank lithium heparin whole blood sample pool over five days with 2 reagent lots. The LoD study was performed by measuring 192 replicates of 4 low concentration lithium heparin plasma samples and 182 replicates of 6 low concentration lithium heparin whole blood samples over 5 days with 2
7
{7}
reagent lots. The LoQ study was performed by measuring 155 replicates of 4 low concentration lithium heparin plasma samples and 92 replicates of 6 low concentration lithium heparin whole blood samples over 6 days with 2 reagent lots. The results demonstrated $\mathrm{LoB} < \mathrm{LoD} \leq \mathrm{LoQ} < 5.0$ IU/L. Recovery at the claimed lower assay limit of $5\mathrm{IU / L}$ is shown above in section M.1.b. and summarized below:
| Sample Type | Bias |
| --- | --- |
| Lithium Heparinized Plasma | -0.2 to -1.2 IU/L |
| Lithium Heparinized Whole Blood | 0.3 to 1.1 IU/L |
# e. Analytical specificity:
# Interference:
Following CLSI guideline EP07-A2, potential exogenous and endogenous interferents were spiked into both lithium heparinized whole blood and lithium heparinized plasma with various hCG concentrations including hCG concentrations near decision limits. Measured hCG concentrations in the presence of interferent were compared to measured hCG concentrations in control samples without interferent, and recoveries were determined. The following compounds were tested at the concentrations shown below. No interference was observed. All recoveries in the presence of the compounds shown below were within $+/- 10\%$ (the criterion defined by the Sponsor).
| Substance | Test Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 1660 uM |
| Acetyl Salicylic Acid | 3620 uM |
| Allopurinol | 294 uM |
| Ampicillin | 152 uM |
| Ascorbic Acid | 342 uM |
| Atenolol | 37.6 uM |
| Atropine | 20 mg/dL |
| Caffeine | 308 uM |
| Captopril | 23 uM |
| Chloramphenicol | 155 uM |
| Diclofenac | 169 uM |
| Digoxin | 6.53 uM |
| Dopamine | 5.87 uM |
| Enalaprilat | 0.86 uM |
| Erythromycin | 81.6 uM |
| Furosemide | 181 uM |
| Gentisic Acid | 117 uM |
| Ibuprofen | 2425 uM |
| Isosorbide dinitrate | 636 uM |
| Methyldopa | 71 uM |
| Nicotine | 6.2 uM |
{8}
| Nifedipine | 1156 uM |
| --- | --- |
| Phenytoin | 198 uM |
| Propanolol | 7.71 uM |
| Salicylic acid | 4340 uM |
| Sodium Heparin | 90 U/mL |
| Theophylline | 222 uM |
| Verapamil | 4.4 uM |
| Warfarin | 65.2 uM |
| Albumin | 60 g/L |
| Bilirubin | 342 uM |
| Cholesterol | 13 mM |
| Hemoglobin | 2 g/L |
| Triglyceride | 37 mM |
| Uric Acid | 1.4 mM |
**Specificity:**
Assay specificity was determined by testing hCG spiked lithium heparinized whole blood and heparinized plasma samples in the presence of LH (450 IU/L), FSH (300 IU/L), and TSH (100 mIU/L), and comparing test results to hCG samples in the absence of these additional hormones. Recoveries were all within +/- 10% (criteria defined by the Sponsor).
**Hematocrit (HCT):**
The effect of different hematocrit levels was evaluated using hCG levels in whole blood samples (20-30 IU/L and 1200-1500 IU/L) with hematocrit levels falling in one of four bins: Zero (plasma), Low (25% - 35%), Nominal (36% - 43%), and High (44% - 51%). The labeling indicates that imprecision (CV) and bias exceeding 10% have been observed in samples with HCT > 50%PCV (packed cell volume).
**f. Assay cut-off:**
See detection limit above (M.1.d.).
**2. Comparison studies:**
**a. Method comparison with predicate device:**
The method comparison study was done in accordance with the CLSI guideline EP09-A2. The measurements were obtained at four external POC sites, where whole blood samples were collected and immediately tested in duplicate with the candidate device. The collection tubes were then transferred to the hospital laboratory. The plasma portion was separated from the red cells and the plasma portion of each sample was tested in duplicate with both the candidate and the predicate devices. Testing was performed by 6-8 operators at each POC site. Each sample was tested with a minimum of two lots of i-STAT Total β-hCG cartridges and six i-STAT 1 Analyzers were used at each POC site.
The analyses of the first measurements of the whole blood (candidate device), plasma (candidate device) vs plasma (predicate) from all sites are shown below:
{9}
| | i-STAT (Whole Blood) vs. ARCHITECT (Fresh Plasma) | i-STAT (Fresh Plasma) vs. ARCHITECT (Fresh Plasma) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N | 134 | 134 |
| Slope | 0.95 (0.92 to 0.97) | 1.02 (1.00 to 1.04) |
| Intercept | 2.39 (1.14 to 3.64) | -0.22 (-1.17 to 0.73) |
| R | 0.99 (0.98 to 0.99) | 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) |
# b. Matrix comparison:
The matrix comparison study was done in accordance with the CLSI guideline EP09-A2. Forty samples spanning the measurement range of the i-STAT Total $\beta$ -hCG test were prepared from 40 donor samples by spiking with a stock solution containing commercially available hCG antigen. Results of each sample type listed below were analyzed against the control (Li-heparin plasma), as shown below.
| Parameter | Na-Heparin Whole Blood | Li-Heparin Whole Blood | Na-Heparin Plasma |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| N | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Deming Slope (95% CI) | 0.94 (0.91 – 0.98) | 0.98 (0.95 – 1.01) | 0.98 (0.95 – 1.00) |
| Deming Intercept (95% CI) | 0.5 (0.3 – 0.6) | 0.5 (0.2 – 0.7) | -0.5 (-1.9 – 0.8) |
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
# 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
# 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The reference range study was performed according to CLSI Guideline C28-A3c. Human plasma and whole blood samples from apparently healthy non-pregnant women were tested to determine the reference range for the i-STAT Total $\beta$ -hCG test. The results are listed below:
{10}
| Reference Population age (years) | N Subjects | N Whole blood results | N Plasma results | Median (IU/L) | Range (IU/L) | 95th Percentile (IU/L), [95% CI] |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ≥ 18 and < 40 | 123 | 122 | 120 | 0 | 0 – 3.9 | 0.7 [0.3, 1.6] |
| ≥ 40 | 125 | 125 | 124 | 0 | 0 – 9.6 | 4.5 [4.0, 5.4] |
| ≥ 40, pre-menopausal | 68 | 68 | 68 | 0 | 0 – 2.5 | -- |
| ≥ 40, post-menopausal | 57 | 57 | 56 | 1.5 | 0 – 9.6 | -- |
# N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
# O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.