K132633 · Ok Biotech Co., Ltd. · NBW · Aug 14, 2014 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K132633
Device Name
OKMETER DIRECT BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM
Applicant
Ok Biotech Co., Ltd.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2014
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upper-arm, calf, thigh, or palm. The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening of diabetes or for neonatal use. Alternative site testing should be done only during steady-state times (when glucose is not changing rapidly). The OKmeter Direct Test Strips are for use with the OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upperarm, calf, thigh, or palm.
Device Story
System measures capillary whole blood glucose via electrochemical amperometric biosensor technology. User applies 0.7 µL blood sample to test strip; glucose oxidase enzyme reacts with glucose to generate electrical current proportional to concentration. Meter converts current to glucose value (20–600 mg/dL). Used at home by patients for diabetes management; single-patient use only. Provides quantitative readout; aids in monitoring diabetes control effectiveness. Includes meter, test strips, lancing device, and control solutions. Validated for fingertip and alternative site testing (palm, forearm, upper-arm, calf, thigh).
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study with 135 patients compared OKmeter Direct system to YSI 2300 reference analyzer across finger, palm, forearm, upper-arm, and calf sites. Results demonstrated strong correlation (R² > 0.97) for all sites. Accuracy met requirements for glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL and ≥75 mg/dL, with 100% of results within ±20% of reference values for concentrations ≥75 mg/dL across all tested sites.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical biosensor with carbon electrodes. Measures glucose in capillary whole blood. Sample volume 0.7 µL; measuring time 6 seconds. Detecting range 20-600 mg/dL; HCT range 20-60%. Calibration via control solution. Handheld form factor (95x45x18.4 mm, 70g). Battery-powered. No connectivity specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative blood glucose monitoring in people with diabetes for home self-testing. Not for neonatal use, diabetes screening/diagnosis, or critically ill/shock/dehydrated/hyper-osmolar patients. Alternative site testing restricted to steady-state conditions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Okmeter Match Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K090609)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k132633
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Capillary whole blood glucose from the fingertip, forearm, upper-arm, calf, thigh, or palm
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, amperometric method, Glucose Oxidase
E. Applicant:
OK Biotech Co., Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
| Regulation Section | Classification | Product Code | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21 CFR § 862.1345 | Class II | CGA, glucose oxidase, glucose | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| 21 CFR § 862.1345 | Class II | NBW, system, test, blood glucose, over the counter | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indication(s) for use below.
{1}
2. Indication(s) for use:
OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System
The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upper-arm, calf, thigh, or palm. The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared.
The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening of diabetes or for neonatal use. Alternative site testing should be done only during steady-state times (when glucose is not changing rapidly).
The OKmeter Direct Test Strips are for use with the OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Meter to quantitatively measure glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upperarm, calf, thigh, or palm."
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- For in vitro diagnostic use
- Not for neonatal use or screening for or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Not for use on critically ill patients, patients in shock, dehydrated patients or hyper-osmolar patients.
- Alternative site testing (AST) should not be used to calibrate continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) or for use in insulin dose calculations
- AST should only be done during steady-state times (when glucose is not changing rapidly)
- For single patient use only and should not be shared
4. Special instrument requirements:
OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Meter
I. Device Description:
The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of the glucose meter, the Direct glucose test strips, lancing device, and the OKmeter Control Solutions (Level 1 and Level 2). The control solutions for use with the OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System were cleared under k090609. Test strips and one level of control material are included in the starter kit.
2
{2}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
OKmeter Match Blood Glucose Monitoring System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k090609
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate Device
OKmeter Match (k090609) | Candidate Device
OKmeter Direct Blood
Glucose Monitoring System |
| Intended Use | Quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood to be used as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control in people with diabetes. | Same |
| Test Principle | Electrochemical amperometric | Same |
| Enzyme | Glucose Oxidase | Same |
| Sample Type | Fresh Capillary Whole Blood | Same |
| Sample Volume | 0.7 μl | Same |
| Sample Site | Fingertip, palm, forearm, upper arm, calf, thigh | Same |
| Measuring time | 6 sec | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate Device
Okmeter Match (k090609) | Candidate Device
OKmeter Direct Blood
Glucose Monitoring System |
| Dimensions (length x width x height) | 105 mm x 55 mm x 18 mm | 95 mm x 45 mm x 18.35 mm |
| Weight (g) | 82 g | 70 g
83 g |
| Speaking Function | Yes | No |
| Memory Feature | 450 measurements with date and time | 180 measurements with date and time |
| Day Average | 7, 14, 21, 28, 60, and 90 day | 7, 14, 21, and 28 day |
| Measuring range | 25-580 mg/dL | 20-600 mg/dL |
| Hematocrit range | 20-55% | 20-60% |
| Humidity range | <85% | 10-85% |
{3}
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- IEC/EN 60601-1: Medical electrical equipment Part I. General requirements for safety, 1995.
- IEC/EN 60601-1: Medical electrical equipment Part 1. General requirements for safety, 2001.
- IEC 61010-2-101: Safety particular requirements for IVD equipment, 2002.
- IEC/EN 60601-1-2: Medical electrical equipment, Part 2, Electromagnetic compatibility – Requirements and tests, 2007.
- FCC 47 CFR, Part 18, 2004.
- ISO 15197: In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus, 2003.
- CLSI EP5-A: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline – 2nd edition, 1999.
- CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach, 2003.
- CLSI EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline – 2nd edition, 2005.
L. Test Principle:
The test is based on electrochemical biosensor technology and the principle of capillary action. The glucose oxidase and potassium ferricyanide in the strip react with the glucose in the sample to produce an electrical current which is proportional to the amount of glucose in the sample. The meter measures the current and converts it to the corresponding glucose concentration.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Repeatability and between-run precision studies were performed using CLSI EP5-A: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline – Second Edition.
The repeatability study was performed with venous whole blood samples at five glucose concentrations using three strip lots and ten meters. There were a total of twenty measurements per strip lot per glucose level per meter. These tests were performed in one day. Results are summarized below.
Test Strip Lot 1
| Glucose conc. (mg/dL) | 30-50 | 51-110 | 111-150 | 151-250 | 251-400 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 46.4 | 92.0 | 134.0 | 239.0 | 329.3 |
| Std Dev (mg/dL) | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 4.8 | 7.6 |
| CV (%) | 3.0 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 |
{4}
Test Strip Lot 2
| Glucose conc. (mg/dL) | 30-50 | 51-110 | 111-150 | 151-250 | 251-400 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 46.1 | 92.1 | 133.7 | 239.4 | 328.8 |
| Std Dev (mg/dL) | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 5.3 | 7.5 |
| CV (%) | 3.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
Test Strip Lot 3
| Glucose conc. (mg/dL) | 30-50 | 51-110 | 111-150 | 151-250 | 251-400 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 46.4 | 91.9 | 134.1 | 239.3 | 329.7 |
| Std Dev (mg/dL) | 1.5 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 5.2 | 7.2 |
| CV (%) | 3.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
The between-run precision study was performed with glucose control materials at three levels. Each level was analyzed twenty times per day over ten days on each strip lot. Results are summarized below.
Test Strip Lot 1
| Glucose conc. | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 51.0 | 99.1 | 292.0 |
| Std Dev (mg/dL) | 1.6 | 2.4 | 6.0 |
| CV (%) | 3.2 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
Test Strip Lot 2
| Glucose conc. (mg/dL) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 51.1 | 99.1 | 292.9 |
| Std Dev (mg/dL) | 1.7 | 2.3 | 6.1 |
| CV (%) | 3.2 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
Test Strip Lot 3
| Glucose conc. (mg/dL) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Mean (mg/dL) | 51.1 | 98.8 | 294.0 |
| Std Dev (mg/dL) | 1.6 | 2.3 | 5.8 |
| CV (%) | 3.1 | 2.3 | 2.0 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity was evaluated using two test strip lots and nine pools of venous blood samples with concentrations spanning the claimed measuring range (21, 51, 80, 149, 250, 349, 402, 497, and 604 mg/dL as measured by the reference method). Each level
{5}
was measured 10 times per test strip lot and the values from the OK Biotech BGMS were compared with those obtained from YSI-2300. The results from linear regression analysis are summarized below:
Test strip Lot 1:
y = 0.98x + 1.33; r = 0.9996
Test strip Lot 2:
y = 0.98x + 0.88; r = 0.9996
The results of the study support the sponsor’s claimed glucose measurement range of 20 – 600 mg/dL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
According to the sponsor, the OKmeter Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS) is traceable to the YSI 2747 Glucose Standard (NIST SRM #917c Clinical Dextrose). A method comparison was performed using the candidate device and a glucose oxidase method (YSI 2300) as the reference method (see Section M.2.a.)
Test Strip Stability
Closed vial (shelf life)
Test strip shelf life stability was assessed in real time studies. Testing protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The manufacturer claims shelf life stability of 24 months at the recommended storage temperatures of 4 – 40°C and 10-85% relative humidity.
Opened vial (in-use)
Test strip opened vial stability was assessed in real time studies. Testing protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The manufacturer claims an opened vial stability of six months at the recommended storage temperatures of 4 – 40°C and 10-85% relative humidity.
Two control solutions (Level 1 and Level 2) are available for use with the Okmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Value assignment and stability for the control solutions were evaluated in k090609. The shelf life and opened vial stability established in k090609 at 10–40°C were 18 months and 90 days, respectively.
d. Detection limit:
The measuring range of the device is 20 - 600 mg/dL. This range was validated by the linearity study (M.1.b).
e. Analytical specificity:
The sponsor tested substances for interference using three lots of test strips, five meters, and three glucose concentrations in the ranges of 50 – 100, 200 – 275, and 400 – 500 mg/dL.
{6}
Venous whole blood samples were spiked to toxic levels or ten times the highest recommended therapeutic or physiological level. Each test sample was then tested five times per strip lot for a total of 15 measurements per sample per interferent. The sponsor defined no significant interference as $\leq \pm 10\%$. According to this criterion no significant interference was seen at the following concentrations:
| Interferent | Level Tested |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 15 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid | 5 mg/dL |
| Aspirin | 60 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 90 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 500 mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 5 mg/dL |
| Dopamine | 2 mg/dL |
| Galactose | 900 mg/dL |
| Gentisic Acid | 5 mg/dL |
| Hydroxyurea | 3 mg/dL |
| L-dopa | 10 mg/dL |
| Maltose | 900 mg/dL |
| Methyldopa | 3 mg/dL |
| Tolbutamide | 400 mg/dL |
| Triglyceride | 2000 mg/dL |
| Uric acid | 8 mg/dL |
However, the sponsor stated in the labeling that elevated concentrations of reducing substances occurring in the blood naturally (uric acid) or from therapeutic treatments (ascorbic acid, acetaminophen) may affect test results.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Fingerstick and Alternate Site Testing Comparison Studies:
To assess the performance of the OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System in the intended use population the sponsor performed a study with 135 lay user participants. The health care professional collected capillary blood from each participant from each sampling site and analyzed it using an OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Performance was evaluated by comparing blood glucose results from the candidate BGMS obtained by the health care professional against the reference value (YSI). The glucose concentration of the samples ranged from 57.8 to $391\mathrm{mg/dL}$ as measured by the reference method. The results are summarized in the
{7}
tables below for three strip lots combined.
| For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site | Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| Finger | 17/21 (81%) | 21/21 (100%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Palm | 14/21 (67%) | 21/21 (100%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Forearm | 14/21 (67%) | 20/21 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Upper arm | 15/21 (71%) | 20/21 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Calf | 16/21 (76%) | 20/21 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Thigh | 14/21 (67%) | 20/21 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| For glucose concentrations ≥ 75 mg/dL | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site | Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| Finger | 84/114 (74%) | 100/114 (88%) | 111/114 (97%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Palm | 74/114 (68%) | 99/114 (87%) | 110/114 (96%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Forearm | 67/114 (59%) | 97/114 (85%) | 109/114 (96%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Upper arm | 69/114 (61%) | 100/114 (88%) | 109/114 (96%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Calf | 67/114 (59%) | 99/114 (87%) | 109/114 (96%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Thigh | 74/114 (65%) | 97/114 (85%) | 109/114 (96%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Linear Regression Analysis | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Site | Slope and y-intercept | r2 |
| Finger | y = 1.0001x - 0.6033 | r2=0.9884 |
| Palm | y = 0.99x + 1.7572 | r2=0.9859 |
| Forearm | y = 0.9962x - 0.9202 | r2=0.9843 |
| Upper arm | y = 1.0111x - 1.2414 | r2=0.9808 |
| Calf | y = 0.967x + 3.9017 | r2=0.9823 |
| Thigh | y = 1.0095x - 1.1861 | r2=0.9856 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
{8}
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
# Fingerstick and Alternate Site Testing Comparison Studies:
To assess the performance of the OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System in the intended use population the sponsor performed a study with 135 lay user participants who did not have any experience using an OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Training in this study consisted only of the participants reading the OKmeter Direct user guide written in English. For each sampling site, the participants collected and analyzed their own sample using the OKmeter Direct system. Performance was evaluated by comparing blood glucose results from the candidate BGMS obtained by the lay user against the reference value (YSI). The glucose concentration of the samples ranged from 57.8 to $391\mathrm{mg / dL}$ as measured by the reference method. The results are summarized in the tables below for three strip lots combined:
| For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site | Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| Finger | 15/21 (71%) | 21/21 (100%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Palm | 15/21 (71%) | 20/21 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Forearm | 15/21 (71%) | 20/21 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Upper arm | 14/21 (67%) | 20/21 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Calf | 14/21 (67%) | 20/21 (95%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| Thigh | 18/21 (86%) | 21/21 (100%) | 21/21 (100%) |
| For glucose concentrations ≥ 75 mg/dL | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Site | Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| Finger | 83/114 (73%) | 100/114 (88%) | 111/114 (97%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Palm | 74/114 (65%) | 102/114 (89%) | 111/114 (97%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Forearm | 64/114 (56%) | 99/114 (87%) | 113/114 (99%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Upper arm | 75/114 (66%) | 102/114 (89%) | 111/114 (97%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Calf | 66/114 (58%) | 98/114 (86%) | 112/114 (98%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Thigh | 72/114 (63%) | 96/114 (84%) | 110/114 (96%) | 114/114 (100%) |
| Linear Regression Analysis | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Site | Slope and y-intercept | r2 |
| Finger | y = 0.982 + 1.2484 | r2=0.9866 |
| Palm | y = 0.9972x - 0.4212 | r2=0.9874 |
| Forearm | y = 0.9778x + 1.6689 | r2=0.9817 |
| Upper arm | y = 1.0089x - 1.377 | r2=0.9805 |
| Calf | y = 0.9884x + 1.3662 | r2=0.9794 |
| Thigh | y = 1.0191x - 3.1886 | r2=0.986 |
{9}
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
| Time of day | Range, Non-diabetes |
| --- | --- |
| Fasting and before meals | Less than 100 mg/ml |
| Two hours after meals | Less than 140 mg/dl |
The sponsor references: Diabetes Care January 2013 vol. 36 no. Supplement 1 S4-S10
N. Instrument Name:
OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Meter
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and requires a sample volume of 0.7 µL.
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
☐ Yes ☐ No
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
☐ Yes ☐ No
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
☐ Yes ☐ No
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips, forearm, upper-arm, calf, thigh, or palm. The whole blood sample is applied
10
{10}
directly to the test strip by capillary action.
# 5. Calibration:
There is no coding required for the meter by the user. The meter is plasma calibrated.
# 6. Quality Control:
Two levels of OKmeter Control Solution are available and one level is provided in the starter kit. Recommendations on when to test the control materials are provided in the labeling. The control solution readings are not included in the average of the patients results. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the strip vial label. The user is cautioned not to use the meter if the control result falls outside these ranges.
# P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
# 1. Hematocrit Study
The effect of hematocrit levels was evaluated using venous whole blood samples with hematocrit levels of $15 - 65\%$ (15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 and $65\%$ ) spiked with glucose to achieve target concentrations of 80, 125, and $320~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . Twenty measurements were obtained for each combination of glucose target concentration and hematocrit and compared to the value obtained from the YSI. The results demonstrated that the OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System produces accurate results over the claimed hematocrit range of $20 - 60\%$ .
# 2. Sample Volume Study
The recommended minimum sample volume for the OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Monitoring System is $0.7\mu \mathrm{l}$ . The sponsor performed a study to determine the effect of sample volumes from 0.5 to $1.5\mu \mathrm{l}$ in comparison to YSI. The study supports the sponsor's claimed minimum sample volume of $0.7\mu \mathrm{l}$ .
# 3. Altitude Study
An altitude study was performed in venous whole blood using three meters and three lots of test strips at five glucose levels in the ranges of 30 - 50, 51 - 110, 111 - 150, 151 - 250, and 251 - 400 mg/dL. The meter results were compared to the reference YSI at various altitudes up to 10335 feet (3150 meters). The study supports the sponsor's claimed maximum altitude of 10335 feet.
# 4. Temperature and Humidity Studies
To evaluate the effect of temperature and humidity the sponsor compared the meter results vs. the reference method under the following environmental conditions:
| Temperature (°C) | Relative Humidity (%) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | 10 |
| 10 | 85 |
{11}
| 40 | 10 |
| --- | --- |
| 40 | 85 |
| 45 | 10 |
| 45 | 85 |
Three glucose concentrations (ranges 38 – 68, 132 – 188, and 280 – 420 mg/dL) were tested in venous whole blood at each combination of temperature and humidity above using three lots of strips. The study results support the claimed operating conditions of 10 – 40° C and 10 – 85% relative humidity.
5. Infection Control
The OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Meter is intended for single-patient use only. Virucide efficacy testing was performed by an outside commercial testing service using Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) demonstrating disinfection efficacy with DISPATCH Hospital Cleaner Disinfectant Towels with Bleach (EPA Reg No.56392-8) on the materials comprising the meter. The sponsor also conducted robustness studies and demonstrated that there was no change in the performance or the external materials for the meter after 520 cleaning and disinfection cycles to simulate 5 years of single-patient use by lay-users. Each robustness cycle consisted of one pre-clean wipe and one disinfecting wipe. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
6. Electromagnetic Compatibility
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing was performed on OKmeter Direct, Blood Glucose Meter. A signed technical compliance statement was provided to demonstrate that the EMC testing was performed according to the standards listed in the test report. The test report indicates that the OKmeter Direct Blood Glucose Meter is compliant with the requirements of the listed standards.
7. Readability Assessment
The strip labeling and User's Manual returned a Flesch-Kincaid reading level of 7.8 and 7.5 respectively.
8. Customer Service
Customer Support is available Monday - Friday from 9 am – 5 pm EST. The toll free phone number is 1-800-243-2636. Users are instructed to contact their healthcare provider when customer support is not available.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
{12}
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.