LIAISON(R) TOXO IGG II, LIAISON(R) CONTROL TOXO IGG II
K132234 · DiaSorin, Inc. · LGD · Aug 28, 2013 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K132234
Device Name
LIAISON(R) TOXO IGG II, LIAISON(R) CONTROL TOXO IGG II
Applicant
DiaSorin, Inc.
Product Code
LGD · Microbiology
Decision Date
Aug 28, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3780
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K132234 · Aug 28, 2013
LIAISON(R) TOXO IGG II, LIAISON(R) CONTROL TOXO IGG II
DiaSorin, Inc.
Prospective clinical samples from individuals sent to the laboratory for routine Toxoplasma gondii testing; Prospective clinical samples from pregnant women
Real-world clinical samples were used to validate the assay cut-off and demonstrate clinical performance (agreement) against a predicate device in a routine clinical testing population.
The LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer for the qualitative determination of specific IgG antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in human serum. The results of this assay can be used as an aid in the assessment of the patient's serological status to infection with Toxoplasma gondii and in the determination of immune status of individuals including pregnant women. This assay has not been cleared/approved by the FDA for blood/plasma donor screening. U.S. Federal Law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician. Assay performance characteristics have not been established for immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients, cord blood, neonatal specimens, or infants. The LIAISON® Control Toxo IgG II (negative and positive) is intended for use as assayed quality control samples to monitor the performance of the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer.
Device Story
The LIAISON® Toxo IgG II is an indirect chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) performed on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer. It uses magnetic particles coated with Toxoplasma gondii antigen and a mouse monoclonal anti-human IgG conjugate linked to an isoluminol derivative. The analyzer performs all incubation and wash steps. During the first incubation, patient IgG antibodies bind to the solid phase; during the second, the conjugate binds to the captured IgG. Starter reagents induce a flash chemiluminescence reaction, measured as relative light units (RLU) by a photomultiplier. The system provides qualitative results (IU/mL) to aid clinicians in assessing Toxoplasma gondii infection and immune status. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Benefits include automated processing and rapid turnaround compared to manual ELISA methods.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance evaluated via prospective study (804 samples: 204 US, 600 European) and 202 pregnant women, plus retrospective study (42 positive samples). CDC serum panel (100 samples) showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Prospective US population agreement: 100% negative, 100% positive. European population: 94.3% negative, 98.8% positive. Pregnant population: 100% negative, 85.7% positive.
Technological Characteristics
Indirect CLIA; magnetic particles coated with inactivated T. gondii (RH strain); mouse monoclonal anti-human IgG-isoluminol conjugate. Automated on LIAISON® XL Analyzer. Flash chemiluminescence detection via photomultiplier. Standardized to WHO 2nd International Standard (1980) via E6 National Standard Serum. Reagents include BSA, phosphate buffer, ProClin® 300. Connectivity via RFID tag for master curve storage.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative determination of Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies in human serum to assess serological status and immune status, including in pregnant women. Not for blood/plasma donor screening. Not established for immunocompromised/immunosuppressed patients, cord blood, neonates, or infants.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Toxoplasma gondii serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in serum. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents) used to identify Toxoplasma gondii from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis caused by the parasitic protozoan Toxoplasma gondii and provides epidemiological information on this disease. Congenital toxoplasmosis is characterized by lesions of the central nervous system, which if undetected and untreated may lead to brain defects, blindness, and death of an unborn fetus. The disease is characterized in children by inflammation of the brain and spinal cord.
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K132234
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain substantial equivalence for the DiaSorin LIAISON® IgG II and LIAISON® Control IgG II
C. Measurand:
Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies in human serum
D. Type of Test:
Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
E. Applicant:
DiaSorin Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
DiaSorin LIAISON® IgG II and LIAISON® Control IgG II
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.3780 - Toxoplasma gondii Serological Reagents
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
LGD; Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Toxoplasma gondii
{1}
4. Panel:
83 Microbiology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
**DiaSorin LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay**
The DiaSorin LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer® for the qualitative determination of specific IgG antibodies to *Toxoplasma gondii* in human serum. The results of this assay can be used as an aid in the assessment of the patient’s serological status to infection with *Toxoplasma gondii* and in the determination of immune status of individuals including pregnant women. This assay has not been cleared/approved by the FDA for blood/plasma donor screening. US Federal law restricts the device to sale by or on the order of a physician. Assay performance characteristics have not been established for immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients, cord blood, neonatal specimens or infants.
**LIAISON® Control Toxo IgG II**
The LIAISON® Control Toxo IgG II (negative and positive) is intended for use as assayed quality control samples to monitor the performance of the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer.
2. Indication(s) for use:
**DiaSorin LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay**
The DiaSorin LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay uses chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) technology on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer® for the qualitative determination of specific IgG antibodies to *Toxoplasma gondii* in human serum. The results of this assay can be used as an aid in the assessment of the patient’s serological status to infection with *Toxoplasma gondii* and in the determination of immune status of individuals including pregnant women. This assay has not been cleared/approved by the FDA for blood/plasma donor screening. US Federal law restricts the device to sale by or on the order of a physician. Assay performance characteristics have not been established for immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients, cord blood, neonatal specimens or infants.
**LIAISON® Control Toxo IgG II**
The LIAISON® Control Toxo IgG II (negative and positive) is intended for use as assayed quality control samples to monitor the performance of the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay on the LIAISON® XL Analyzer.
{2}
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
LIAISON® XL Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The method for qualitative determination of IgG antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii (anti-Toxo IgG) is an indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). All assay steps (with the exception of magnetic particle resuspension) and incubations are performed by the LIAISON® XL Analyzer. The principal components of the test are magnetic particles (solid phase) coated with Toxoplasma gondii and a conjugate of mouse monoclonal antibodies to human IgG linked to an isoluminol derivative (isoluminol-antibody conjugate). During the first incubation, Toxoplasma gondii antibodies present in diluted calibrators, samples or controls bind to the solid phase. During the second incubation, the monoclonal antibody conjugate reacts with anti-Toxo IgG that is already bound to the solid phase. After each incubation, the unbound material is removed with a wash cycle. Subsequently, the starter reagents are added and a flash chemiluminescence reaction is thus induced. The light signal, and therefore, the amount of isoluminol-antibody conjugate, is measured by a photomultiplier as relative light units (RLU) and is indicative of the presence of anti-Toxo IgG in calibrators, samples or controls.
Reagent Integral
| Magnetic Particles (2.5 mL) | [SORB] | Magnetic particles coated with inactivated Toxoplasma gondii (RH strain) obtained from sonicated and detergent-extracted trophozoites, BSA, phosphate buffer, < 0.1% sodium azide. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Calibrator 1 (2.7 mL) | [CAL|1] | Human serum/defibrinated plasma containing low Toxoplasma gondii IgG levels, BSA, PBS buffer, 0.2% ProClin® 300*, an inert yellow dye. The calibrator concentrations (IU/mL) are referenced to the National Standard Serum for Toxoplasmosis E6 (National Health Laboratory, France, 1987), standardized against WHO 2nd International Standard (1980). |
| Calibrator 2 (2.7 mL) | [CAL|2] | Human serum/plasma containing high Toxoplasma gondii IgG levels, BSA, PBS buffer, 0.2% ProClin® 300, an inert blue dye. The calibrator concentrations (IU/mL) are referenced to the National Standard Serum for Toxoplasmosis E6 (National Health Laboratory, France, 1987), standardized against WHO 2nd International Standard (1980). |
| Specimen Diluent (2 x 28 mL) | [DIL|SPE] | BSA, phosphate buffer, 0.2% ProClin® 300, an inert yellow dye. |
| Conjugate (28 mL) | [CONJ] | Mouse monoclonal antibodies to human IgG conjugated to an isoluminol derivative, BSA, phosphate buffer, 0.2% ProClin® 300, preservatives. |
{3}
*ProClin® is a registered trademark of Rohm and Haas Co. All reagents are supplied ready to use. The order of the reagents reflects the layout of the containers in the reagent integral.
## Materials required but not provided
- LIAISON® XL Cuvettes ([REF] X0016)
- LIAISON® XL Disposable Tips ([REF] X0015)
- LIAISON® XL Starter Kit ([REF] 319200)
- LIAISON® Wash/System Liquid ([REF] 319100)
- LIAISON® XL Waste Bags ([REF] X0025)
## Additional required materials
LIAISON® Control Toxo IgG II ([REF] 310706)
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Diamedix Is-Toxoplasma IgG ELISA
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K981498
{4}
# 3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device (K132234) | Predicate (K981498) |
| Intended Use | The LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay is an immunoassay for the qualitative determination of specific IgG antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in human serum specimens. The results of this assay can be used as an aid in the assessment of the patient's serological status to infection with Toxoplasma gondii and in the determination of immune status of individuals including pregnant women. The assay has not been cleared/approved by the FDA for blood/plasma donor screening. | The Diamedix Is Toxoplasma IgG Test Kit is an immunoassay. For the qualitative, and quantitative, detection of IgG to Toxoplasma gondii in human serum. The results of this assay can be used as an aid in the assessment of the patient's immunological response to infection with T. gondii, and in the determination of immune status of individuals, including females of child-bearing years. This product has not been cleared/approved by the FDA for blood/plasma donor screening. |
| Measured Analyte | IgG antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii | IgG antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii |
| Reagent Storage | On-board or in refrigerator @ 2-8°C | In refrigerator @ 2-8°C |
| Calibrators | Included in kit | Included in kit |
| Controls | 2 levels (negative and positive) | 2 levels (negative and positive) |
| Sample Matrix | Human serum | Human Serum |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device (K132234) | Predicate (K981498) |
| Assay Type | Chemiluminescent Immunoassay | Enzyme Assay |
| Calibration Standardization | E6 (National Health Laboratory, France 1987) standardized against WHO 2ndInternational Standard | WHO 3rdInternational Standard |
| Calculation of results | Qualitative Assay | Qualitative or Quantitative Assay |
| Unit of Measure | IU/mL | Index Value (Qualitative) IU/mL (Quantitative) |
| Cut-Off | ≥ 8.8 IU/mL | 1.10 Index Value (Qualitative) 50 IU/mL. (Quantitative) |
| Equivocal Zone | 7.2 – 8.8 IU/mL | 0.90 – 1.09 Index Value |
| Sample Size | 20 μL | Minimum of 2 μL |
| Sample Handling/Processing | Automated | Manual or Automated |
| Assay Time | 35 minutes | 140 minutes |
| Controls | Provided separately | Included with kit |
| Conjugate | Mouse monoclonal antibodies to human IgG conjugated to an isoluminol derivative | Goat anti-human IgG labeled with horseradish peroxidase |
| Measurement System | Photomultiplier (flash chemiluminescence reader) | Spectrophotometer (EIA microtiter plate reader) |
{5}
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- EP05-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quality Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline - Second Edition 2004
- EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry – Approved Guideline – Second Edition 2005
- CSLI: M36-A: Clinical Use and Interpretation of Serological Tests for Toxoplasma gondii, Approved Guideline Vol. 24, No. 6
L. Test Principle:
This test is a Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) – Immunoassay technology based on the emission of light as a result of a chemical reaction. During the first incubation, Toxoplasma gondii antibodies present in diluted calibrators, samples or controls bind to the solid phase. During the second incubation, the monoclonal antibody conjugate reacts with anti-Toxo IgG that is already bound to the solid phase. After each of the incubations, unbound material is removed with a wash cycle. Subsequently, the starter reagents are added and a flash chemiluminescence reaction is thus induced. The light signal, and therefore, the amount of isoluminol-antibody conjugate, is measured by a photomultiplier as RLUs and is indicative of the presence of anti-Toxo IgG in calibrators, samples or controls.
M. Performance Characteristics:
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision was assessed by measuring repeatability at one site using two kit controls and six serum samples prepared to span the measuring range of the assay. Mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated using multiple sources of variability that include within-run, within-day, between-day, and total variability. The following results were obtained from one site with one kit lot assayed in duplicate in two assays per day over 20 operating days.
Precision
| Sample ID | Sample N | Mean IU/mL | Within-Run | | Within-Day | | Between-Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Neg Control* | 80 | <3.0 | 90.36* | 5.6%* | 89.13* | 5.5%* | 155.58* | 9.6%* | 200.8* | 12.4%* |
| Pos Control | 80 | 22.8 | 1.19 | 5.2% | 0.68 | 3.0% | 0.48 | 2.1% | 1.45 | 6.4% |
| Sample #1* | 80 | <3.0 | 151.7* | 6.3%* | 48.72* | 2.0%* | 262.18* | 10.9%* | 306.8* | 12.8%* |
| Sample #2 | 80 | 7.5 | 0.53 | 7.2% | 0.54 | 7.2% | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.75 | 10.0% |
{6}
Reproducibility was assessed across all three testing sites using two kit controls and 7 serum samples prepared to span the measuring range of the assay. Mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated using multiple sources of variability that include within-run, within-day, between-day, site to site and total variability. The following results were obtained from three sites with two kit lots assayed in duplicate in two assays per day over 20 operating days.
Reproducibility
| Sample ID | Sample N | Mean IU/mL | Within-Run | | Within-Day | | Between-Day | | Between Site | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Neg Control* | 480 | <3.00 | 100.82* | 6.4%* | 87.89* | 5.5%* | 147.49 | 9.3%* | 208.12* | 13.1%* | 320.20* | 20.2%* |
| Pos Control | 480 | 22.8 | 1.4 | 6.1% | 0.74 | 3.3% | 1.6 | 7.0% | 0.7 | 3.1% | 2.69 | 11.8% |
| Sample #1* | 480 | <3.00 | 136.38* | 5.5%* | 94.22* | 3.8%* | 215.71* | 8.7%* | 375.14* | 15.2%* | 603.16* | 24.4%* |
| Sample #2 | 480 | 7.4 | 0.48 | 6.5% | 0.33 | 4.5% | 0.42 | 5.8% | 0.21 | 2.8% | 0.88 | 12.0% |
| Sample #3 | 480 | 15.3 | 0.79 | 5.2% | 0.61 | 4.0% | 0.8 | 5.2% | 0.38 | 2.5% | 1.72 | 11.2% |
| Sample #4 | 480 | 13.6 | 0.68 | 5.0% | 0.6 | 4.4% | 0.89 | 6.6% | 0.44 | 3.2% | 1.43 | 10.5% |
| Sample #5 | 480 | 26.9 | 1.23 | 4.6% | 1.12 | 4.2% | 1.43 | 5.3% | 0.92 | 3.4% | 2.81 | 10.5% |
| Sample #6 | 480 | 77.3 | 3.92 | 5.1% | 4.42 | 5.7% | 5.95 | 7.7% | 2.77 | 3.6% | 9.44 | 12.2% |
* Dose and corresponding RLUs were below the reading range of the assay.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable - This assay is qualitative.
{7}
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
The calibrator concentration (IU/mL) is referenced to National Standard Serum for Toxoplasmosis E6 (National Health Laboratory, France, 1987), standardized against WHO 2nd International Standard (1980).
Stability:
Reagent Integral:
Open use stability at 2-8°C was performed on one Reagent Integral Lot. At specified intervals, the stored opened kit was evaluated in parallel with a freshly opened kit. All testing was acceptable to 5 weeks. An open use stability of 4 weeks at 2-8°C is claimed. Open use stability on board the LIAISON® Analyzer was performed on one Reagent Integral Lot. At specified intervals, the opened kit was evaluated in parallel with a freshly opened kit. All testing was acceptable to 5 weeks. An open use stability of 4 weeks onboard the LIAISON® Analyzer is claimed.
| Unopened stored @ 2-8°C | Up to the stated expiration date |
| --- | --- |
| Opened stored @ 2-8°C | 8 weeks |
| Opened stored on analyzer | 8 weeks |
Controls:
| Unopened stored @ 2-8°C | Up to the stated expiration date |
| --- | --- |
| Opened stored @ 2-8°C | 8 weeks |
Samples:
| Storage @ 2-8°C | 7 days |
| --- | --- |
| Freeze/thaw | Up to 5 freeze/thaw cycles |
Expected Values:
Calibrator 1 is manufactured to have a concentration between 10 - 20 IU/mL. Calibrator 2 is manufactured to have a concentration between 200 - 400 IU/mL. The Negative Control is manufactured to a target value less than 3.0 IU/mL. The Positive Control is manufactured to have a target value of 22.0 IU/mL.
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable - This assay is qualitative.
{8}
e. Analytical specificity:
Cross-reactivity:
The cross-reactivity study for the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay was designed to evaluate potential interference from the presence of potentially cross-reactive antibodies or substances and other viruses that may cause symptoms similar to or that may mimic toxoplasmosis infection. Only samples that were sero-positive for the cross reactant and sero-negative for Toxoplasma gondii IgG by a commercially available Toxoplasma IgG assay were used to test for potentially cross-reactive organisms.
| Cross-reactive organism or condition | Number of samples tested | Reference Toxo IgG Result | LIAISON® Toxo IgG II | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | POS | EQV | NEG |
| Anti-HAV | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Anti-HBc | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Anti-VZV IgG | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Anti-Rubella IgG | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Anti-CMV IgG | 10 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Anti-EBV EBNA IgG | 10 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Anti-EBV VCA | 10 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Anti-HSV 1 IgG | 10 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Anti-HSV 2 IgG | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Anti-ANA IgG | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Anti-ds DNA IgG | 2 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Anti-Measles IgG | 10 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Anti-Mumps IgG | 10 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Treponema total antibodies | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Anti-Parvo IgG | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| anti-HIV | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| anti-HCV | 5 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| HAMA | 10 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 3 | Negative | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 125 | | 0 | 0 | 125 |
High Dose Hook Effect (false negative):
Analysis of high-dose hook effect was evaluated by testing three samples with Toxoplasma gondii IgG levels out-of-range $>400\mathrm{IU / mL}$ . The samples resulted in calculated concentration values above the measuring range with no sample misclassification, indicating no hook effect was observed.
{9}
Interference:
Testing was performed to determine whether the presence of endogenous or exogenous substances may interfere with assay results. Three matched sample pools containing antibodies to Toxoplasma IgG near the clinical decision point were tested neat and spiked with the respective interferent. Acceptance criteria were defined as the % change in signal must not be more than +/- 10% and not change the qualitative result.
No interference was found at the concentration for each substance listed below in the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay. The testing was based on CLSI-EP07-A2.
| Substance | Tested Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Triglycerides | 3000 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 1000 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated bilirubin | 20 mg/dL |
| Conjugated bilirubin | 20 mg/dL |
| Albumin | 6000 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 510 mg/dL |
f. Assay cut-off:
The cutoff for the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay was set at an International Unit value of 8.8 IU/mL based on European studies by testing 1000 subjects from different populations. The samples were tested in parallel with the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay and CE marked comparison methods. Consensus between the methods as well as the available clinical and serological data was applied to define the expected results. The assay cut-off was validated in the United States during clinical studies by testing a prospective population of 804 samples from individuals sent to the laboratory for Toxoplasma gondii testing and 202 pregnant women. Ten samples resulted in an equivocal interpretation on the comparator test and therefore, were not used in analysis. Based on the comparison studies this cutoff is appropriate for the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay. In the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay, a sample is defined as positive if the International Unit value is greater than or equal to 8.8 IU/mL, and defined as negative if the International Unit value is less than 7.2 IU/mL. Samples with results greater than or equal to 7.2 IU/mL and less than 8.8 IU/mL are classified as equivocal.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not applicable
{10}
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
# Comparative testing
Prospective and retrospective studies were performed to compare the performance of the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay to an FDA-cleared predicate device.
The prospective study consisted of 804 samples (204 samples from US subjects, 600 samples from European subjects) from individuals who were sent to the laboratory for Toxoplasma gondii testing and 202 pregnant women.
The retrospective study consisted of 42 samples selected from individuals who had a positive Toxoplasma gondii IgG result by the predicate device.
Interpretation of Results:
| Index | Results | Interpretation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| < 7.2 IU/mL | Negative | Absence of detectable Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies. A negative result does not always rule out acute infection. The test usually scores negative in infected people during the incubation period and the early stages of infection. If exposure to toxoplasma gondii is suspected despite a negative finding, a second sample should be collected and tested one or two weeks later. |
| | | |
| ≥ 7.2 IU/mL - < 8.8 IU/mL | Equivocal | The equivocal sample should be repeat tested. If the result remains in this range after repeat testing, a second sample should be collected and tested no less than one or two weeks later.. |
| | | |
| ≥ 8.8 IU/mL | Positive | Presence of detectable Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies. A positive result generally indicates either recent or past exposure to the pathogen. If IgG test scores positive in the presence of IgM antibodies, recent infection may be postulated. If IgG test scored positive in the absence of IgM antibodies, past infection my be postulated. |
| | | |
{11}
# Prospective study
The prospective US population consisting of 204 individuals were $96.1\%$ female $(n = 196)$ age and $3.9\%$ male $(n = 8)$ ranging in age from 18 to 42 years. There were 147 samples from subjects where the age was unknown. The prospective European population consisted of 600 individuals. Age and gender for these samples are unknown. The prospective population of pregnant women consists of 202 females with ages ranging from 14 years to 44 years. There were 71 samples from subjects in the $1^{\text{st}}$ trimester, 50 samples form subjects in the second trimester and 81 samples from subjects in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy.
The agreement with $95\%$ Confidence intervals for each prospective population is shown in the tables below:
Toxoplasma IgG Prospective US Population Comparison
| LIAISON® Toxo IgG II | Comparator Assay | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | |
| Positive | 21 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| Equivocal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Negative | 0 | 0 | 183 | 183 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 183 | 204 |
Percent Agreement
Exact $95\%$ Confidence Interval
| Negative | 183/183 | 100.0% | 98.0 – 100.0% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 21/21 | 100.0% | 84.5 – 100.0% |
Toxoplasma IgG Prospective European Population Comparison
| LIAISON® Toxo IgG II | Comparator Assay | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | |
| Positive | 329 | 7 | 6 | 342 |
| Equivocal | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Negative | 2 | 2 | 252 | 256 |
| Total | 331 | 9 | 260 | 600 |
Percent Agreement
Exact $95\%$ Confidence Interval
| Negative | 252/267 | 94.3% | 90.9 – 96.6 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 329/333 | 98.8 % | 96.6– 99.5% |
{12}
Toxoplasma IgG Pregnant Population Comparison
| LIAISON® Toxo IgG II | Comparator Assay | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | |
| Positive | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Equivocal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Negative | 1 | 1 | 188 | 190 |
| Total | 13 | 1 | 188 | 202 |
| | | Percent Agreement | Exact 95% Confidence Interval |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Negative | 188/188 | 100.0 % | 98.0 – 100.0% |
| Positive | 12/14 | 85.7 % | 60.1 – 96.0 % |
Retrospective study
The retrospective population consisted of 42 samples from individuals who had a positive Toxoplasma IgG result by the Diamedix Is-Toxoplasma IgG ELISA. There were 95.2% females (n=40) and 4.8% males (n=2) ranging in age from 0 years to 47 years.
The agreement with 95% Confidence intervals for the pre-selected population is shown in the table below:
Toxoplasma Retrospective Population Comparison
| LIAISON® Toxo IgG II | Comparator Assay | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Equivocal | Negative | |
| Positive | 42 | 0 | 0 | 42 |
| Equivocal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Negative | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 0 | 0 | 42 |
| | | Percent Agreement | Exact 95% Confidence Interval |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 42/42 | 100.0% | 91.6 – 100.0% |
CDC Study Panel:
The CDC Toxoplasma 1998 Human Serum Panel panel is comprised of 100 frozen blind specimens (70 Toxoplasma IgG true positive samples, and 30 Toxoplasma IgG true negative samples). The panel was tested by LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay. The results were submitted
{13}
to the CDC (Reference Immunodiagnostic Lab, Biology and Diagnostic Branch Division of Parasitic Diseases) for data analysis. As communicated by CDC, the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay correctly detected the 70 Toxoplasma IgG true positive samples (100% Sensitivity) and the 30 Toxoplasma IgG true negative samples (100% Specificity).
## 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
## 5. Expected values:
The observed prevalence of the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay was calculated from the prospective sample populations collected from US, European, and pregnant subjects. The samples from US subjects (n=204) consisted of 8 males (3.9%) and 196 females (96.1%). Known ages ranged from 18 years to 42 years. There were 147 samples where age was unknown. Gender and ages for samples from the European subjects (n=600) are unknown. The pregnancy samples consisted of 202 females with ages ranging from 14 to 44 years. There were 71 samples from subjects in the 1st trimester, 50 samples from subjects in the 2nd trimester, and 81 samples from subjects in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. The prevalence may vary depending upon geographical location, age, gender, type of test employed, specimen collection and handling procedures as well as clinical history of the patient.
The observed prevalence of the LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay for each prospective population is as follows:
- US Population 10.3%
- European Population 57.0%
- Pregnant Women 5.9%
## N. Instrument Name:
LIAISON® XL Analyzer
## O. System Descriptions:
### 1. Modes of Operation:
The method for qualitative determination of IgG antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii (anti-Toxo IgG) is an indirect chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). The principal components of the test are magnetic particles (solid phase) coated with Toxoplasma gondii and a conjugate of mouse monoclonal antibodies to human IgG linked to an isoluminol derivative (isoluminol-antibody conjugate). During the first incubation, Toxoplasma gondii antibodies present in diluted calibrators, samples or controls bind to the solid phase. During the second incubation, the monoclonal antibody
{14}
conjugate reacts with anti-Toxo IgG that is already bound to the solid phase. After each incubation, unbound material is removed with a wash cycle. Subsequently, the starter reagents are added and a flash chemiluminescence reaction is thus induced. The light signal, and therefore, the amount of isoluminol-antibody conjugate, is measured by a photomultiplier as relative light units (RLU) and is indicative of the presence of anti-Toxo IgG in calibrators, samples or controls.
All assay steps and incubations are performed by the LIAISON® XL Analyzer.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☑ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification: Not Applicable
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling: Not Applicable
5. Calibration:
DiaSorin's LIAISON® Toxo IgG II assay generates a continuous response (relative light units, RLU) which is used in sample grading to provide a qualitative (positive, negative, or equivocal) reportable result. The sample grading is based on a calibration curve referenced to National Standard Serum for Toxoplasmosis E6 (National Health Laboratory, France, 1987), standardized against WHO 2nd International Standard (1980) Reference preparation. Typical dose-response curve of any assay kit lot is described by a dedicated master curve.
The two calibrators in the kit are assayed by the user to transform the kit lot specific Master Curve into a Working Curve, describing the testing conditions specific for the given testing session. From the working curve, doses for the unknown samples are calculated. For each lot, the Master Curve is stored in the Radio Frequency Identification transponder (RFID Tag) of the Reagent Integral. Master curve is defined for each lot during the quality control of the batch. In the same process, calibrators are checked for compliance with expected concentration and adjusted if not compliant. In the same testing session actual titer is assessed. A final trimming of the titer is then achieved targeting established reference doses of the Quality Control Panel. Calibrator 1 is manufactured targeting a concentration between 10-20 IU/mL. Calibrator 2 is manufactured targeting a concentration between 200-400 IU/mL. Calibrators are manufactured from serum or defibrinated plasma units at a proper concentration of IgG anti-Toxoplasma, and then diluted in buffer to reach desired titer.
{15}
In five different experiments, a calibration panel, batch calibrators and a quality control panel are assayed in order to define the master curve and titration of the calibrators:
1. Calibration panel determines the working curve of each of the five experiments and allows the calculation of the doses associated to the batch calibrators;
2. Doses of the batch calibrators are assessed in respect to the target range. Calibrators are corrected by dilution or concentration as needed;
3. From the five working curve a master curve for the specific batch is calculated;
4. Doses of the calibrators are used to calculate results for the quality control panel from the defined master curve: a fine trimming of the calibrator's dose is possible in order to optimize response on the quality control panel in respect to reference established ranges.
The calibration panel is made of two major components:
1. A Full Standardization Curve: Full Standardization Curve is obtained as an Internal Standard Curve from a pool of human serum and/or defibrinated plasma at high titer, serially diluted in a negative and/or defibrinated plasma pool. It is calibrated versus an Internal Primary Standard Curve, in turn referenced to the National Standard Serum for Toxoplasmosis E6 (National Health Laboratory, France, 1987) Primary Curve. This is obtained by direct reconstitution and dilution of the E6 Standard;
2. An accuracy panel: a set of samples at various doses along the assay range. Reference established doses of members of the accuracy panel are defined in a specific qualification session.
The Calibration panel is used to determine the typical dose-response curve of the assay accounting for the behavior of both the reference standard and true specimens.
The analyzer is calibrated in triplicate whenever one of the following conditions occurs (see LIAISON® XL Analyzer Operator's manual):
- A new lot of Reagent Integral or a new lot of Starter Kit is used.
- The previous calibration was performed more than four weeks before
- The analyzer has been serviced.
- Control values fall outside the expected ranges.
Calibrators and controls are manufactured separately. Raw material segregation is also maintained by the use of different part numbers for the stock solutions intended to manufacture the calibrators and controls.
6. Quality Control:
The LIAISON® Control Toxo IgG II ([REF] 310706) is recommended for the determination of quality control requirements for this assay and should be run in singleicate to monitor the assay performance. Quality control is recommended once per
{16}
day of use, or in accordance with local, state, and/or federal regulations or accreditation requirements and your laboratory's quality control procedures. It is recommended the user refer to CLSI document C24-A3 and 42 CFR 493.1256(c) for guidance on appropriate quality control practices.
The range of concentrations of each control is reported on the certificate of analysis and indicates the limits established by DiaSorin for control values that can be obtained in reliable assay runs. The performance of other controls should be evaluated for compatibility with this assay before they are used. Appropriate value ranges should be established for all quality control materials used. Quality control could be performed by running the LIAISON® Control Toxo IgG II sera or dedicated commercial controls:
- at least once per day of use,
- whenever the kit is calibrated,
- whenever a new lot of Starter Reagents is used,
Control values must be within the expected ranges: whenever one of the controls results fall outside the expected ranges, calibration should be repeated and controls retested. If control values obtained after successful calibration fall repeatedly outside the predefined ranges, the test should be repeated using an unopened control vial. If the control values fall outside the expected ranges, patient results must not be reported.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Not Applicable
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.