ACE DIRECT TOTAL IRON-BINDING CAPACITY (TIBC) REAGENT, ACE TOTAL IRON REAGENT, ACE LDH-L REAGENT
K131975 · Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. · CFJ · Oct 2, 2013 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K131975
Device Name
ACE DIRECT TOTAL IRON-BINDING CAPACITY (TIBC) REAGENT, ACE TOTAL IRON REAGENT, ACE LDH-L REAGENT
Applicant
Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, Inc.
Product Code
CFJ · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Oct 2, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1440
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The ACE Direct Total Iron-Binding Capacity (TIBC) Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total iron-binding capacity in serum using the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System. Iron-binding capacity measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of anemia. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories and physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The ACE Total Iron Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of iron in serum using the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System. Iron (non-heme) measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as iron deficiency anemia, hemochromatosis (a disease associated with widespread deposit in the tissues of two iron-containing pigments, hemosiderin and hemofuscin, and characterized by pigmentation of the skin), and chronic renal disease. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories and physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The ACE LDH-L Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of lactate dehydrogenase activity in serum using the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System. Lactate dehydrogenase measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases such as acute viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, and metastatic carcinoma of the liver, cardiac diseases such as myocardial infarction, and tumors of the lung or kidneys. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories and physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
Device Story
Reagents for ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System; perform quantitative photometric analysis of serum samples. TIBC assay: uses chromazurol B, cetrimide, and ferric chloride; measures absorbance decrease at 647 nm. Iron assay: uses ferrozine; measures violet complex at 554/692 nm. LDH-L assay: enzymatic conversion of L-lactate and NAD to pyruvate and NADH; measures NADH increase at 340 nm. Used in clinical/physician office labs by trained personnel. Output provides analyte concentration/activity levels to assist clinicians in diagnosing anemia, iron disorders, liver/cardiac diseases, and tumors. Benefits include rapid, automated diagnostic testing.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision/reproducibility evaluated per CLSI EP05-A2 (N=76 per level in-house; N=20 per level at 3 POL sites). Linearity evaluated per CLSI EP06-A (r^2 > 0.998). Method comparison to predicates performed per CLSI EP09-A2 (n=48-58 samples per analyte, r^2 > 0.996). Interference testing per CLSI EP07-A2. LoD/LoQ determined per CLSI EP17-A.
Indicated for quantitative determination of TIBC, iron, and LDH-L in serum for diagnosis/treatment of anemia, hemochromatosis, chronic renal disease, liver diseases (e.g., hepatitis, cirrhosis), and cardiac diseases (e.g., myocardial infarction). Intended for use in clinical and physician office laboratories.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A lactate dehydrogenase test system is a device intended to measure the activity of the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase in serum. Lactate dehydrogenase measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases such as acute viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, and metastatic carcinoma of the liver, cardiac diseases such as myocardial infarction, and tumors of the lung or kidneys.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k131975
B. Purpose for Submission:
New reagents (Total Iron-binding capacity, Iron, Lactate dehydrogenase) added onto ACE Alera instrument (k123018).
C. Measurand:
Total Iron-binding capacity
Iron
Lactate dehydrogenase
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, photometric methods, enzymatic activity
E. Applicant:
Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ACE Direct Total Iron-Binding Capacity (TIBC) Reagent
ACE Total Iron Reagent
ACE LDH-L Reagent
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JMO | Class I, reserved | 21 C.F.R. §862.1415
Iron-binding capacity test system | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| JIY | Class I, reserved | 21 C.F.R. §862.1410
Iron (non-heme) test system | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
{1}
2
| CFJ | Class II, exempt, meets limitations of exemption. 21 CFR 862.9 (c)(9) | 21 C.F.R. § 862.1440 Lactate dehydrogenase test system | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The ACE Direct Total Iron-Binding Capacity (TIBC) Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total iron-binding capacity in serum using the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System. Iron-binding capacity measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of anemia. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories and physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Total Iron Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of iron in serum using the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System. Iron (non-heme) measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as iron deficiency anemia, hemochromatosis (a disease associated with widespread deposit in the tissues of two iron-containing pigments, hemosiderin and hemofuscin, and characterized by pigmentation of the skin), and chronic renal disease. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories and physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE LDH-L Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of lactate dehydrogenase activity in serum using the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System. Lactate dehydrogenase measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases such as acute viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, and metastatic carcinoma of the liver, cardiac diseases such as myocardial infarction, and tumors of the lung or kidneys. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories and physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription and point-of-care use.
4. Special instrument requirements:
ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System
{2}
I. Device Description:
ACE Direct Total Iron-Binding capacity (TIBC) Reagent assay consists of the Direct TIBC Color Reagent (R1) and the Direct TIBC Buffer (R2). The Direct TIBC Color Reagent contains chromazurol B, cetrimide, ferric chloride and acetate buffer. The Direct TIBC Buffer contains sodium bicarbonate buffer. Both reagents are added to the serum sample. Calibrators are package separately and have been previously cleared in k052148.
ACE Serum Iron Reagent is composed of two reagent bottles, Buffer (R1) and Color Reagent (R2). The Buffer contains hydroxylamine hydrochloride, acetate buffer (pH 4.5) and surfactant. The Color Reagent contains ferrozine and hydroxylamine hydrochloride. Calibrators are provided with the iron reagents (Iron standard) and have been previously cleared in k944911.
ACE LDH-L Reagent is composed of two reagent bottles (Substrate and Coenzyme Reagent). The reagents contain L-lactic acid (112 mmol/L) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (11.8 mmol/L).
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s) and 510(k) numbers:
ACE Direct Total Iron-Binding Capacity (TIBC) Reagent: k930104
ACE Iron Reagent: k944911
ACE LDH-L Reagent: k931786
2. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate Device | Predicate Device (k930104; ACE Direct Total Iron-Binding capacity (TIBC) Reagent) |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of total iron-binding capacity in human serum. | Same |
| Method | Photometric | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Expected value | 250-425 μg/dL | 250-450 μg/dL |
| Measuring range | 52-700 μg/dL | Same |
| Instrument platform | ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
{3}
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate device | Predicate device (k944911; ACE Iron Reagent) |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of iron in human serum. | Same |
| Method | Photometric | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Expected value | Male: 65-175 μg/dL
Female: 50-170 μg/dL | Same |
| Measuring range | 12-600 μg/dL | 2-600 μg/dL |
| Instrument platform | ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Candidate device | Predicate device (k931786: ACE LDH-L Reagent) |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of lactate dehydrogenase activity in human serum. | Same |
| Method | Photometric | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum | Same |
| Expected value | 100-190 U/L | Same |
| Measuring range | 18-850 U/L | 17-850 U/L |
| Instrument platform | ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System | ACE Clinical Chemistry System |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI Guideline EP05-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods: Approved Guideline - Second Edition (2004).
CLSI Guideline EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Qualitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach (2003)
CLSI Guideline EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition (2005)
CLSI Guideline EP09-A2-IR: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline - Second Edition (2002)
{4}
CLSI Guideline EP17-A: Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation (2004)
L. Test Principle:
ACEDirectTotalIron-Bindingcapacity(TIBC)Reagent
The Direct TIBC Color reagent releases iron from transferrin, forming a color complex with the dye. Then the Direct TIBC Buffer is added, shifting the pH and resulting in a large affinity of transferrin for iron. The serum transferrin rapidly binds the iron by abstracting the iron from the dye-iron complex. The decrease in absorbance is directly proportional to the total iron binding capacity of the serum sample. The absorbance is measured at 647 nm.
ACESerumIronReagent
The transferring-bound iron in serum is released at a pH and reduced from ferric to ferrous iron. These ions react with ferrozine to form a violet color complex, which is measured bichromatically at 554 nm/692 nm. The intensity of color produced is directly proportional to the serum iron concentration.
ACE LDH-L Reagent
The ACE LDH-L Reagent for the Axcel Clinical Chemistry System is an enzymatic photometric test; LDH in serum catalyzes the conversion of the L-lactate and NAD substrates to pyruvate and NADH, and the NADH product which is measured at 340 nm. The rate of increase of absorbance from the formation of NADH is directly proportional to the amount of LDH activity in the serum sample.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision studies were conducted in house following CLSI guidance document EP05-A2. At least 3 serum-based samples of low, mid and high analyte were run on the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System in duplicate, for 2 runs per day, for a minimum of 19 days (N=76 per concentration level). Results are summarized below:
| ACE Alera | Precision (SD, %CV) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Mean | Within-Run | Total |
| TIBC μg/dL | Low | 217 | 4.1, 1.9% | 6.7, 3.1% |
| | Mid | 270 | 3.7, 1.4% | 7.1, 2.6% |
| | High | 310 | 5.0, 1.6% | 8.6, 2.8% |
| | Low | 62 | 3.2, 5.2% | 4.6, 7.3% |
{5}
| Iron μg/dL | Mid | 145 | 2.2, 1.5% | 4.2, 2.9% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | High | 226 | 4.1, 1.8% | 5.0, 2.2% |
| LDH-L U/L | 1 | 77 | 3.8, 4.9% | 4.2, 5.5% |
| | 2 | 119 | 5.1, 4.3% | 5.2, 4.3% |
| | 3 | 270 | 4.5, 1.7% | 5.8, 2.1% |
| | 4 | 651 | 12.6, 1.9% | 13.5, 2.1% |
Precision studies were conducted at 3 Physician Office Laboratories (POL) with trained operators typically found in these settings, following CLSI guidance document EP05-A2. Three serum samples each of low, mid and high analyte were analyzed on the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System in duplicate, for 5 days at 2 runs per day (N=20 per analyte level at each POL site). Results are summarized below.
TIBC:
| | | ACE Alera Result | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=20 | | μg/dL | SD, %CV | |
| Lab | Sample | Mean | Within-Run | Total |
| POL 1 | 1 | 284 | 8.3 | 9.6 |
| | | | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 259 | 5.6 | 8.5 |
| | | | 2.2% | 3.3% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 276 | 9.1 | 16.7 |
| | | | 3.3% | 6.0% |
| POL 1 | 2 | 464 | 6.3 | 6.6 |
| | | | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 444 | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| | | | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 453 | 3.2 | 15.5 |
| | | | 0.7% | 3.4% |
| POL 1 | 3 | 544 | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| | | | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 520 | 5.0 | 9.0 |
| | | | 1.0% | 1.7% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 533 | 12.6 | 20.2 |
| | | | 2.4% | 3.8% |
{6}
Iron:
| | | ACE Alera Result | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=20 | | μg/dL | SD, %CV | |
| Lab | Sample | Mean | Within-Run | Total |
| POL 1 | 1 | 119 | 2.7 | 3.2 |
| | | | 2.3% | 2.7% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 122 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| | | | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 116 | 3.2 | 3.4 |
| | | | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| | | | | |
| POL 1 | 2 | 229 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| | | | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 235 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| | | | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| POL 3 | 2 | 229 | 3.4 | 3.9 |
| | | | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| | | | | |
| POL 1 | 3 | 424 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| | | | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 435 | 2.4 | 5.3 |
| | | | 0.5% | 1.2% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 428 | 11.1 | 11.1 |
| | | | 2.6% | 2.6% |
LDH:
| | | ACE Alera Result | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n=20 | | μg/dL | SD, %CV | |
| Lab | Sample | Mean | Within-Run | Total |
| POL 1 | 1 | 116 | 1.7 | 4.9 |
| | | | 1.5% | 4.3% |
| POL 2 | 1 | 118 | 3.0 | 5.1 |
| | | | 2.5% | 4.3% |
| POL 3 | 1 | 124 | 3.4 | 4.7 |
| | | | 2.7% | 3.8% |
| | | | | |
| POL 1 | 2 | 437 | 2.9 | 5.8 |
| | | | 0.7% | 1.3% |
| POL 2 | 2 | 449 | 3.7 | 5.2 |
{7}
| | | | 0.8% | 1.2% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| POL 3 | 2 | 446 | 5.8 | 6.6 |
| | | | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| | | | | |
| POL 1 | 3 | 698 | 8.6 | 11.5 |
| | | | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| POL 2 | 3 | 726 | 5.4 | 10.0 |
| | | | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| POL 3 | 3 | 716 | 14.3 | 16.9 |
| | | | 2.0% | 2.4% |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
A linearity study was conducted following CLSI guidance document EP06-A. Serum samples were spiked with the appropriate analyte and a 10 sample dilution series was created by diluting with a low level analyte sample. The assigned values of the highest and lowest sample were set to their mean values. Each level was tested in triplicate on the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System. The linear regression correlation between the expected values and the measured values for each of the assays is summarized below:
| | Range Tested | Linear Regression fit | Correlation Coefficient |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TIBC | 34 - 740 μg/dL | y = 1.020x + 3.1 | 0.9981 |
| Iron | 6 - 666 μg/dL | y = 1.030x + 1.9 | 0.9986 |
| LDH-L | 8 - 895 U/L | y = 1.050x - 0.7 | 0.9981 |
The linearity data provided by the sponsor support the following reportable range claims:
| Analyte | Assay range |
| --- | --- |
| TIBC | 52-700 μg/dL |
| Iron | 12-600 μg/dL |
| LDH-L | 18-850 U/L |
Automatic dilution study: The ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System can perform automatic dilutions of samples that exceed the upper limit of the ACE Total Iron and ACE LDH-L assays (1:2 and 1:4 dilutions, respectively). To examine the accuracy of the auto-dilution function for these reagents, serum samples were spiked with high concentrations of analyte and were then either run directly on the ACE Alera system or they were manually diluted using system diluent (3 samples per instrument system, run in quintuplicate). The results from the auto-dilution and the manually diluted samples, run on the same ACE Alera system, were compared. All samples recovered within $10\%$
{8}
recovery. The auto-dilution function is not available for ACE Direct TIBC Reagent.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
**ACE LDH reagent**
No calibrator is needed. Calibration of the LDH-L assay is traceable to a frozen Master Pool of verification material utilized by the reagent supplier. Each lot of reagent is tested by running the Master Pool and verifying that results of the Master Pool levels are within an acceptable percentage of the assigned values of the Master Pool. For value assignment, each new verification Master Pool is made by gravimetrically adding quantities of lactate dehydrogenase to a serum pool to target concentrations. Five levels of Master Pool are prepared, aliquoted and stored at ≤-70°C. The final values of the Master Pool are assigned for each level by testing at least 3 replicates on multiple instruments. The activity levels of the new Master Pool are verified using a previously approved Master Pool lot as a control.
**ACE Direct Total Iron-Binding capacity (TIBC) Reagent**
Traceable to another commercially available FDA cleared assay by method comparison. The calibrator was previously cleared under k052148.
**ACE Serum Iron Reagent**
Traceable to NIST SRM 937. The calibrator was previously cleared under k944911.
d. Detection limit:
Limit of Blank (LoB) and Limit of Detection (LoD) studies were performed and were determined to be adequate. Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) was determined according to CLSI guidance document EP17-A, by evaluating five low level samples with eight replicates per day over five days, for a total of 40 measurements per sample. The sponsor defined LoQ as concentration with a %CV of < 20%. The results are as follows:
9
{9}
| ACE Alera | TIBC | Iron | LDH-L |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LoB | 11 μg/dL | 0 μg/dL | 11 U/L |
| LoD | 24 μg/dL | 1 μg/dL | 18 U/L |
| LoQ | 52 μg/dL | 9.15 μg/dL | 18 U/L |
The detection limit studies support the sponsors claimed measuring ranges for the ACE TIBC, ACE Iron and ACE LDH-L assays.
Claimed measuring range:
| Analyte | Assay range |
| --- | --- |
| TIBC | 52-700 μg/dL |
| Iron | 12-600 μg/dL |
| LDH-L | 18-850 U/L |
# e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were performed, according to CLSI guidance document EP07-A2, to determine the effects of potential interferents. Various concentrations of interferents were spiked into serum pools containing analytes at normal and abnormal concentrations. All samples were tested in triplicate on the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry system. Six interferent levels and the control samples were tested for each interferent. Bias greater than $+/-10\%$ defines significant interference by the sponsor. The results of the highest concentration tested without significant interference are as follows:
| | No Significant Interference at or below: | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | TIBC (250 and 550 μg/dL) | Iron (95 and 310 μg/dL) | LDH-L (150 and 530 U/L) |
| Bilirubin | 59 mg/dL | 59 mg/dL | 50 mg/dL |
| Hemolysis | 188 mg/dL | 125 mg/dL | < 31 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid | 3 mg/dL | 6 mg/dL | 6 mg/dL |
Intralipid concentration tested up to $1000\mathrm{mg / dL}$ did not interfere with the TIBC or LDH assays, however, intralipid concentration above $125\mathrm{mg / dL}$ will interfere with the iron assay, therefore, sponsor put a limitation in the labeling that states "Visibly lipemic samples will interfere with the Iron assay, therefore, lipemic samples should not be used." In addition, since hemolysis
{10}
interferes with all three assays, the package inserts for the ACE TIBC, ACE Total Iron and ACE LDH-L reagents contain the following statement: "Do not use hemolyzed samples."
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
An in-house method comparison study to the predicate device was performed with patient serum samples, in accordance with CLSI Guidance Document EP09-A2. Serum samples covering the assay range were tested in singlicate: 50 serum samples for TIBC (45 native, 3 diluted and 2 spiked), 48 serum samples for Iron (43 native, 0 diluted and 5 spiked), and 58 serum samples for LDH-L (46 native, 6 diluted and 6 spiked). Results of the candidate device were compared to the predicate device. The linear regression results are presented in the table below:
ACE results (x) vs. ACE Alera results (y):
| | TIBC | Iron | LDH-L |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| n | 50 | 48 | 58 |
| Range tested | 59 to 676 μg/dL | 13 to 549 μg/dL | 20 to 799 U/L |
| Slope | 0.987 | 0.993 | 0.997 |
| Intercept | 3.6 | 0.9 | -3.6 |
| Corr. Coef., r2 | 0.9960 | 0.9995 | 0.9982 |
Method comparison studies were completed at 3 POC sites following CLSI document EP09-A2. At least 48 determinations were made in singlicate for serum samples, having analyte levels covering each assay's dynamic range, at the each of 3 POC sites on the ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System (y) and on the ACE Clinical Chemistry System (x) in-house, with the following linear regression data:
| ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry System (y) | | In-House (x) vs. POL 1 (y) | In-House (x) vs. POL 2 (y) | In-House (x) vs. POL 3 (y) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TIBC | n Range Regression Correlation | 50 59 to 676 y = 0.994x + 12.4 0.9934 | 50 59 to 676 y = 0.973x + 0.1 0.9954 | 50 59 to 676 y = 1.005x + 9.0 0.9898 |
| Iron | n | 48 | 48 | 48 |
{11}
| | Range | 13 to 549 | 13 to 549 | 13 to 549 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Regression | y = 0.976x + 1.0 | y = 0.976x + 2.3 | y = 0.951x + 0.8 |
| | Correlation | 0.9986 | 0.9981 | 0.9966 |
| LDH-L | n | 51 | 51 | 51 |
| | Range | 74 to 799 | 74 to 799 | 74 to 799 |
| | Regression | y = 0.992x + 3.5 | y = 1.027x + 3.4 | y = 1.010x + 2.5 |
| | Correlation | 0.9986 | 0.9989 | 0.9984 |
b. Matrix comparison:
None, the device is being cleared for serum use only.
4. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The following expected values are provided in the product insert based on the literature for each analyte*. The sponsor stated that each laboratory should determine the expected values for its particular population.
TIBC expected values are 250-425 µg/dL.
Total Iron expected values are the following for males and females, respectively: 65-175 µg/dL and 50-170 µg/dL.
LDH-L expected values are 100-190 U/L
* Wu, A.H.B., ed. Tietz clinical guide to laboratory tests, 4th edition, p. 880. W.B. Saunders Company, St. Louis (2006).
{12}
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.