POWDERFREE LATEX EXAMINATION GLOVES COATED WITH ALLOGEL
K130667 · Preventive Care, Inc. · LYY · Jul 24, 2013 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K130667
Device Name
POWDERFREE LATEX EXAMINATION GLOVES COATED WITH ALLOGEL
Applicant
Preventive Care, Inc.
Product Code
LYY · General Hospital
Decision Date
Jul 24, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.6250
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
An Examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger, to prevent contamination between the patient and examiner.
Device Story
Disposable, non-sterile, ambidextrous natural rubber examination glove; coated with Allogel® on the interior surface. Manufactured via continuous linked chain dip technology. Used by clinicians to provide a physical barrier between examiner and patient to prevent cross-contamination. Single-use; discarded after each examination. Provides protection during routine medical examinations. Benefits include barrier protection and enhanced physical properties (tensile strength, elongation) compared to standard requirements.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Compliance with ASTM D3578 (physical properties), ASTM D5712 (protein analysis), ASTM D6124 (residual powder), ASTM D412 (tension), ASTM D5151 (pinhole detection), and ISO 10993 (biocompatibility). Results showed tensile strength (18-31 MPa), elongation (500-600%), and pinhole AQL 1.5, all meeting or exceeding ASTM requirements.
Technological Characteristics
Natural rubber examination glove; dip-molded. Coated with Allogel®. Complies with ASTM D3578 (physical properties), ASTM D5712 (protein), ASTM D6124 (powder), ASTM D412 (tension), ASTM D5151 (pinholes), and ISO 10993 (biocompatibility). Thickness: 0.08-0.13 mm. Tensile strength: 18-31 MPa. Elongation: 500-600%. Non-sterile.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a disposable medical glove worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent cross-contamination between patient and examiner. Suitable for general patient examination settings.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A non-powdered patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. A non-powdered patient examination glove does not incorporate powder for purposes other than manufacturing. The final finished glove includes only residual powder from manufacturing.
Predicate Devices
Powderfree Nitrile Examination Gloves Coated with Allogel® (K110102)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# PREVENTIVE CARE, INC.
#### 510 (k) SUMMARY
DATE: June 10th, 2013
#### 1. Submitter
Preventive Care, Inc. 15215, Boulder Trail Rosemount, MN 55068 Tel: 651 322 9120 Fax: 651 322 9196 E Mail: anil@preventivecareinc.com JUL 2 4 2013
#### 2. Contact Person
Contact: Anil Segat Tel: 651 322 9120 Fax: 651 322 9196 E Mail: anil@preventivecareinc.com
#### 3. Name of device
Trade name: Exam Perfect Powderfree Latex Examination Gloves Coated with Allogel® Common Name: Exam Gloves Classification Name: Patient Examination Glove Classification Number: Class 1 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6250 Product code: LYY
#### 4. Legally Marketed Device to which equivalency is claimed: K110102
Powderfree Nitrile Examination Gloves Coated with Allogel®, LZA, Class 1, that meets or exceeds all the applicable requirements of ASTM standards and FDA water leak test.
#### 5. Device Description
The device is a glove with five fingers made from natural rubber that covers the hand on both sides up to the wrist, using a dip technology manufacturing process. The gloves are ambidextrous and therefore can be donned on either hand. The gloves are non sterile and for single use only, to be discarded after each examination is complete. The glove acts as a barrier between the examiner and the subject being examined in order to prevent contamination between the examiner and the subject. The physical properties of the glove are identified in paragraph 9 below, as compared to those required by ASTM D 3578 version 2010.
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### 6. Intended use of the Device
An Examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger, to prevent contamination between the patient and examiner.
### 7. Summary of the technological characteristics of the Device
The device meets all the applicable technical requirements of :
| ASTM D3578<br>Version 2010 | Standard specifications for rubber examination gloves. Data of an actual representative<br>shipment is detailed in Section 14 (original submission). | | ASTM D3578 -2010<br>STANDARD REQUIREMENT | POWDER FREE LATEX EXAM<br>GLOVES COATED WITH ALLOGEL®<br>RESULTS |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ASTM D5712<br>Version 2010 | Standard test method for analysis of aqueous extractable protein in natural rubber and<br>its products using the modified lowry method. Data of an actual representative<br>shipment is detailed in Section 14 (original submission). | 1. Watertight (1000ml)<br>In accordance with ASTM D5151 | Multiple Normal<br>In accordance with ISO 2859<br>Version 10-2006<br>GI AQL2.5 | Pass G1 AQL 2.5 |
| ASTM D6124<br>Version 2006 | Standard test method for residual powder on medical gloves. Data of an actual<br>representative shipment is detailed in Section 14 (original submission). | 2. Length (mm)<br>Size XS<br>S<br>M<br>L<br>XL | Min 220<br>Min 220<br>Min 230<br>Min 230<br>Min 230 | 240 mm minimum for all sizes |
| ASTM D412<br>Version 06ae2 | Test method for vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic rubbers and thermoplastic<br>elastomers-tension. Data of an actual representative shipment is detailed in Section 14<br>(original submission). | 3. Palm Width (mm)<br>Size XS<br>S<br>M<br>L<br>XL | 70 ± 10<br>80 ± 10<br>95 ± 10<br>110 ± 10<br>120 ± 10 | 75 - 80<br>83 - 84<br>94 - 96<br>107-109<br>113-114 |
| ASTM D5151<br>Version 2006 | Standard test method for detection of holes in medical gloves. Data of an actual<br>representative shipment is detailed in Section 14 (original submission). | 4. Thickness (mm)<br>(Single Layer)<br>Finger<br>Palm<br>Cuff | Min 0.05<br>Min 0.05<br>Min 0.05 | Min 0.12<br>Min 0.10<br>Min 0.08 |
| ISO 10993<br>Version 2010 | Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 10, tests for skin irritation and<br>sensitization. The test reports are detailed in section 8 & 9 (original submission). The<br>gloves have passed the biocompatibility test criteria for not being sensitizers or irritants. | 5. Physical Properties<br>In accordance with ASTM D 412<br><b>Before Aging</b><br>Tensile Strength(MPa)<br>Ultimate Elongation (%)<br><b>After Aging</b><br>Tensile Strength(MPa)<br>Ultimate Elongation (%) | Min 14<br>Min 500<br>Min 14<br>Min 400 | 18 - 31<br>530 - 600<br>18-29<br>500-550 |
| 6. Powder Content<br>In accordance with ASTM D6124 | Max 2.0mg/glove | Below 2.0mg/glove | | |
| 7. Residual Latex Proteins | Max 200 micro grams/dm2 | Max 200 micro grams/dm2 | | |
The above are the principal technical standards that the device needs to comply with. The device has substantially enhanced physical properties as compared to those required by ASTM and other relevant standards.
#### 8. Substantial Equivalence
The substantial equivalence to the predicate device is based on non clinical assessment data. A comparison was made of the physical properties and characteristics of both devices for the following attributes, which were found to be substantially similar:
- a. A glove made from natural or synthetic rubber
- b. Use and description
c. Physical properties such as, length, width, thickness, tensile strength, freedom from holes, and residual powder. Although the predicate device made from synthetic rubber has no residual natural rubber proteins, the applicant device made of natural rubber complies with the requirements of ASTM D3578 for the maximum allowable residual proteins. The tensile strength and elongation of the applicant device was found to be superior. The thickness of the applicant device was marginally more than the predicate device, but this is normal for latex examination gloves used for medical purposes and it is within the tolerance levels for such devices.
d. Inner coating made from Allogel®
{2}------------------------------------------------
## 9. Physical Performance data
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 10. Substantial equivalence comparison table
| | APPLICANT | PREDICATE (K110102) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| | PATIENT EXAMINATION<br>GLOVE | PATIENT EXAMINATION<br>GLOVE |
| INICATIONS OF USE | | |
| AMBIDEXTROUS | YES | YES |
| OVER THE COUNTER USE | YES | YES |
| SINGLE USE | YES | YES |
| NON STERILE | YES | YES |
| POWDERFREE | YES | YES |
| POSITIVE BIOCOMPATABILITY TEST RESULTS | NON IRRITANT<br>NON SENSITIZER | NON IRRITANT<br>NON SENSITIZER |
| PRIMARY RAW MATERIAL | NATURAL RUBBER | SYNTHETIC NITRILE RUBBER |
| COATED WITH ALLOGEL® | YES | YES |
| ALLOGEL® FORMULATION AND PROCESS,<br>CONTROLLED BY PREVENTIVE CARE, INC. | YES | YES |
| PRIMARY LABEL | ALLOGEL®POWDERFREE<br>LATEX EXAMINATION GLOVES | ALLOGEL®POWDERFREE<br>NITRILE EXAMINATION<br>GLOVES |
| SPECIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE | | |
| TENSILE STRENGTH BEFORE AGING MINIMUM | 18 MPA | 14 MPA |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 18 MPA | |
| AFTER AGING AT 70 DEG C 7 DAYS. MINIMUM | 14 MPA | 14 MPA |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 17 MPA | |
| ULTIMATE ELONGATION BEFORE AGING MIN. | 650% | 500% |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 797% | |
| AFTER AGING AT 70 DEG C 7 DAYS. MINIMUM | 500% | 400% |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 753% | |
| WIDTH AT PALM (MEDIUM) +/- 5 MM | 95 MM | 95 MM |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 98 MM | |
| LENGTH (MEDIUM) +/- 5 MM | 245 | 245 MM |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 241 MM | |
| THICKNESS AT PALM MINIMUM | 0.08 MM | 0.07 MM |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 0.11 MM | |
| THICKNESS AT FINGER MINIMUM | 0.08 MM | 0.07 MM |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 0.13 MM | |
| THICKNESS AT CUFF MINIMUM | 0.08 MM | 0.07 MM |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 0.08 MM | |
| DETECTION OF PIN HOLES (ASTM D5151) | AQL 2.5 MAX | AQL 2.5 MAX |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | AQL 1.5 | |
| RESIDUAL POWDER | 2 MG/GLOVE | 2 MG/GLOVE |
| APPLICANT PERFORMANCE (see VOL_014_001) | 0.58 MG/GLOVE (MEDIUM) | |
| MINIMUM SHELF LIFE | 3 YEARS | 3 YEARS |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| MANUFACTURING PROCESS | | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-----|
| CONTINUOUS LINKED CHAIN DIP TECHNOLOGY | YES | YES |
| ALLOGEL ® DIP PROCESS | YES | YES |
| PRINCIPAL MATERIALS USED IN THE DIP<br>PROCESS FOR CLEANING, COAGULATING,<br>HEATING AND DRYING ARE THE SAME | YES | YES |
#### 11. Substantial equivalence summary discussion & conclusion
The gloves covered by this application are deemed to be substantially equivalent to the predicate, K110102, Powderfree Nitrile Examination gloves coated with Allogel®. Comparisons between the applicant and this predicate device indicate substantial equivalence, in that both:
- 1. Have the same indication of use
- 2. Are Powderfree Patient Examination Gloves
- 3. Do not show any adverse results in bio compatibility tests
- 4. Are non sterile and are sold over the counter
- 5. Are coated with Allogel® on the inside
- 6. Have similar performance specifications and physical properties
- 7. Meet pin hole AQL requirements as per ASTM D5151 version 2006
- 8. Are ambidextrous
9. Are manufactured using a continuous linked chain dip technology with the usage of similar chemicals
- 10. Use a primary raw material that has properties of Rubber (natural/synthetic)
- 11. Have similar shelf life
The data and explanations provided above, both for the applicate device, illustrates that there are no substantial differences in the use, physical properties and characteristics of the devices. We can therefore conclude that the two devices are substantially equivalent. The applicant devise is therefore as safe, as effective and performs as well as, or better than the predicate device.
{5}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo features a stylized eagle or bird-like symbol with three curved lines representing its wings or body. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES-USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
July 24, 2013
Preventive Care, Incorporated Mr. Anil Segat President 15215 Boulder Trail ROSEMOUNT MN 55068
Re: K130667
Trade/Device Name: Powder- Free Latex Examination Glove Coated with AlloGel® Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6250 Regulation Name: Patient Examination Gloves Regulatory Class: 1 Product Code: LYY Dated: April 24, 2013 Received: April 25, 2013
Dear Mr. Segat:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Segat
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industrv/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safetw/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resources/orYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
DAGRID
Tejashri Purohit-Sheth, M.D. Clinical Deputy Director
FOR
Kwame Ulmer M.S. Acting Division Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use Form
510(k) Number (if known): K130667
Device Name: : Powder-Free Latex Examination Gloves Coated with AlloGel®
Indications for Use:
An Examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger, to prevent contamination between the patient and examiner.
Prescription Use _ _ _ _ _ _ AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
(21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Sreekanth Gutala -S 2013.07.22 14:24:51 =04'00'
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
Page 1 of ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
510(k) Number: ماما 30(k) Number
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.