Retrospective clinical samples were used to determine clinical sensitivity, specificity, and to establish the assay cut-off values for the BioPlex 2200 APLS IgM kit.
199 patients diagnosed with primary or secondary APS and 346 non-APS disease control patients; Sample Size: 545
Not applicable for this study
Clinical sensitivity and specificity
Retrospective analysis of healthy donor samples
300 apparently healthy donors; Sample Size: 300
Not applicable for this study
99th percentile reference range
Indications for Use
The BioPlex® 2200 Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APLS) IgM kit is a multiplex flow immunoassay intended for the semi-quantitative detection of IgM antibodies to Cardiolipin (CL) and Beta-2 Glycoprotein I (B2GPI) in human serum and plasma (lithium heparin, sodium heparin, and sodium citrate). In conjunction with clinical findings, the test system is used as an aid in the diagnosis of primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) and those secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or SLE-like disorders. The BioPlex 2200 APLS IgM kit is intended for use with the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 System. The BioPlex 2200 Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APLS) IgM Calibrator Set is intended for the calibration of the corresponding BioPlex 2200 APLS IgM Reagent Pack. The BioPlex 2200 Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APLS) IgM Control Set is intended for use as an assayed quality control to monitor the overall performance of the BioPlex 2200 Instrument and the corresponding BioPlex 2200 APLS IgM Reagent Pack in the clinical laboratory. The performance of the BioPlex 2200 APLS IgM Control Set has not been established with any other Antiphospholipid assay.
Device Story
Multiplex flow immunoassay; uses dyed beads coated with Cardiolipin and Beta-2-Glycoprotein I antigens. Input: human serum or plasma samples. Process: sample, diluent, and bead reagent incubated at 37°C; wash cycle removes unbound antibody; phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-human IgM conjugate added; second incubation and wash; beads resuspended and passed through detector. Output: relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) converted to semi-quantitative units (MPL-U/mL or U/mL) via calibration curve. Used in clinical laboratories; operated by trained personnel. Includes Internal Standard, Serum Verification, and Reagent Blank beads for quality monitoring. Results aid clinicians in diagnosing APS; used alongside clinical findings.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated 545 specimens (199 APS patients, 346 non-APS disease controls). Sensitivity for aCL IgM was 33.7% (95% CI: 27.5-40.5%) and specificity 96.8% (95% CI: 94.4-98.2%). Sensitivity for aB2GPI IgM was 40.2% (95% CI: 33.6-47.1%) and specificity 96.0% (95% CI: 93.3-97.6%). Method comparison with predicate showed 94.3% total agreement for both analytes.
Indicated for the semi-quantitative detection of IgM antibodies to Cardiolipin and Beta-2 Glycoprotein I in human serum and plasma as an aid in the diagnosis of primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) and APS secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or SLE-like disorders.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A multiple autoantibodies immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoantibodies (antibodies produced against the body's own tissues) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of multiple autoantibodies aids in the diagnosis of autoimmune disorders (disease produced when the body's own tissues are injured by autoantibodies).
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k130528
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
IgM antibodies to Cardiolipin (CL)
IgM antibodies to Beta-2-Glycoprotein I (β2GPI)
D. Type of Test:
Semi-quantitative multiplex flow, bead-based immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit
BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Calibrator set
BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Control set
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR §866.5660 – Multiple autoantibodies immunological test system
21 CFR §862.1150 – Calibrator
21 CFR § 862.1660 – Quality Control Material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II (Assays, Calibrator)
Class I (Controls)
3. Product code:
MID, System Test, Anti-Cardiolipin Immunological
MSV, Antibodies, β2-Glycoprotein I (β2-GPI)
JIX, Calibrator, Mulit-Analyte Mixture
JJX, Single (specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed and Unassayed)
4. Panel:
Immunology (82) (Assays)
Chemistry (75) (Calibrators, Controls)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
{1}
The BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit is a multiplex flow immunoassay intended for the semi-quantitative detection of IgM antibodies to Cardiolipin (CL) and Beta-2 Glycoprotein I (β2GPI) in human serum and plasma (lithium heparin, sodium heparin, and sodium citrate). In conjunction with clinical findings, the test systems are used as an aid in the diagnosis of primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) and those secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or SLE-like disorders.
The BioPlex 2200 APLS IgM kit is intended for use with the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 System.
The BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Calibrator Set is intended for the calibration of the corresponding BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Reagent Pack.
The BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Control Set is intended for use as an assayed quality control to monitor the overall performance of the BioPlex® 2200 Instrument and BioPlex® APLS IgM Reagent Pack in the clinical laboratory. The performance of the BioPlex® APLS IgM Control Set has not been established with any other Antiphospholipid assay.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription Use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
BioRad BioPlex® 2200 Instrument and Software Version 4.0
I. Device Description:
BioPlex® 2200 Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APLS) IgM kit includes the following components:
- One (1) 100 mL vial of Bead Set containing two different populations of dyed beads coated with Cardiolipin (CL) and Beta-2-Glycopropatin I (β2GPI), an Internal Standard Bead (ISB), a Serum Verification Bead (SVB) and a Reagent Blank Bead (RBB) in a MOPS (3-[N-Morpholino] propanesulfonic acid) buffer supplemented with glycerol and protein stabilizers (bovine); ProClin 300 (≤ 0.3%), sodium benzoate (≤ 0.1%) and sodium azide (< 0.1%) as preservatives.
- One (1) 5 mL-vial of Conjugate containing phycoerythrin conjugated murine monoclonal anti-human IgM antibody and phycoerythrin conjugated murine monoclonal anti-human FXIII antibody in MOPS buffer supplemented with protein stabilizer (bovine), and ProClin 300 (≤ 0.3%), sodium benzoate (≤ 0.1%) and sodium azide (< 0.1%) as preservatives,
- One (1) 10-mL vial of Sample Diluent containing buffer with protein stabilizers (bovine and murine), and ProClin 300 (≤ 0.3%), sodium benzoate (≤ 0.1%) and sodium azide (< 0.1%) as preservatives.
BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Calibrator set contains seven vials of human antibodies to CL or β2GPI in a human serum matrix made from defibrinated plasma with ProClin 300 (≤ 0.3%) and sodium azide (< 0.1%) as preservatives.
{2}
BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Control set contains four 1.5-mL vials of Positive controls of human antibodies to CL or β2GPI and two vials of Negative Controls in a human serum matrix made from defibrinated plasma; and, in a human serum matrix made from defibrinated plasma with ProClin 300 (≤ 0.3%), sodium benzoate (≤ 0.1%) and sodium azide (< 0.1%) as preservatives.
Additional materials required but not supplied include BioPlex® 2200 Sheath Fluid containing Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) with ProClin® 300 (0.03%) and sodium azide (<0.1%) as preservatives; and BioPlex® 2200 Wash Solution containing Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and Tween 20 with ProClin® 300 (<0.03%) and sodium azide (<0.1%) as preservatives.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s) and 510(k) number(s):
HemosIL AcuStar anti-Cardiolipin IgM, k092181
HemosIL AcuStar anti-β2 Glycoprotein-I IgM, k091556
2. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device: BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Kit | Predicate: HemosIL AcuStar anti-Cardiolipin IgM | Predicate: HemosIL AcuStar anti-β2 Glycoprotein-I IgM |
| Intended Use | Semi-quantitative detection of IgM antibodies to Cardiolipin (CL) and Beta-2 Glycoprotein I (β2GPI) in human serum and plasma as an aid in the diagnosis of primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) and those secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or SLE-like disorders. | Semi-quantitative measurement of anti-Cardiolipin (aCL) IgM antibodies in human citrated plasma or serum on the ACL AcuStar, as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) | Semi-quantitative measurement of Anti-β2 Glycoprotein-I (Anti-β2GPI) IgM antibodies in human plasma or serum on the ACL AcuStar, as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders related to primary and secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) |
| Sample Type | Serum and plasma (lithium heparin, sodium heparin, and sodium citrate) | Serum or citrated plasma | Serum or citrated plasma |
| Capture Antigen | Purified Cardiolipin antigen (tetraoleoyl succinylcardiolipin (ammonium salt) | Bovine Cardiolipin | Not Applicable |
| | Purified human β2GPI | Same | Same |
{3}
| Similarities | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device: BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Kit | Predicate: HemosIL AcuStar anti-Cardiolipin IgM | Predicate: HemosIL AcuStar anti-β2 Glycoprotein-I IgM |
| Assay Type | Semi-Quantitative detection | Same | Same |
| Analyte Detected | Human IgM antibodies to Cardiolipin | Same | Not Applicable |
| | Human IgM antibodies to β2GPI | Not Applicable | Same |
| Cut-off | Anti-CL: 20 MPL U/mL | Anti-CL: Same – 20 U/mL | Anti-CL: Not Applicable |
| | Anti-β2GPI: 20 U/mL | Anti-β2GPI: Not Applicable | Anti-β2GPI: Same – 20 U/mL |
| Controls | Two levels, Sold separately | Same | Same |
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device: BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Kit | Predicate: HemosIL AcuStar anti-Cardiolipin IgM | Predicate: HemosIL AcuStar anti-β2 Glycoprotein-I IgM |
| Assay Technology | Automated multiplex flow immunoassay | Two-step chemiluminescent immunoassay | Two-step chemiluminescent immunoassay |
| Conjugate Antibody | Phycoerythrin conjugated murine monoclonal anti-human IgM | Isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgM antibody | Isoluminol-labeled anti-human IgM antibody |
| Specimen Type | Serum and plasma (citrated and heparin) | Serum and plasma (citrated only) | Serum and plasma (citrated only) |
| Signal Detection | Fluorescence | Chemiluminescent | Chemiluminescent |
| Solid Phase | Antigen-coated paramagnetic microbead reagent | Antigen-coated magnetic particles | Antigen-coated magnetic particles |
| Control | One Negative and one Positive Controls (sold separately) | One low and one high control (Sold separately) | One low and one high control (Sold separately) |
| Calibrator(s) | 4 levels of Calibrator (sold separately) | Two calibrator levels (included in test kit) | Two calibrator levels (included in test kit) |
{4}
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device: BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Kit | Predicate: HemosIL AcuStar anti-Cardiolipin IgM | Predicate: HemosIL AcuStar anti-β2 Glycoprotein-I IgM |
| Assay Range | Anti-CL: 0.2 – 112 MPL U/mL | Anti-CL: 1.0 – 15480 U/mL | Anti-CL: Not Applicable |
| | Anti-β2GPI: 0.6 – 112 U/mL | Anti-β2GPI: Not Applicable | Anti-β2GPI: 1.1 – 16820 U/mL |
| Quantitation | Results are determined from a standard calibration curve utilizing a point-to-point calculation. | Assay utilizes a stored Master 4 Parameter Logistic Curve (4PLC) fit adjusted with two lot dependent calibrator levels | Assay utilizes a stored Master 4 Parameter Logistic Curve (4PLC) fit adjusted with two lot dependent calibrator levels |
| Instrumentation | Bio-Rad BioPlex® 2200 System | HemosIL AcuStar | HemosIL AcuStar |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CEN 13640:2002, Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents
EP05-A2, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP06-A, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement, Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP07-A2, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, Approved Guideline, Second Edition
EP09-A2IR, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline, Second Edition (Interim Revision) (used for matrix comparison).
EP12-A2, User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative test Performance, Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP14-A2, Evaluation of Matrix Effects, Approved Guideline, Second Edition
EP15-A2, User Verification of Performance for Precision and Trueness, Approved Guideline, Second Edition.
EP17-A, Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantification, Approved Guideline.
## L. Test Principle:
The BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kits use multiplex flow immunoassay, a methodology similar to traditional EIA; however, this method permits simultaneous detection and identification of many antibodies in a single tube. In the BioPlex APLS assays, two different populations of dyed beads are coated with antigens. One bead population is coated with β2-glycoprotein I and a second population is coated with both cardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein I. Three additional populations of fluorescent beads function as assay controls. The system combines an aliquot of patient sample, sample diluent, and bead reagent into a reaction vessel and
{5}
incubates the mixture at 37°C. After a wash cycle to remove unbound antibody, the secondary conjugate containing either phycoerythrin conjugated murine monoclonal anti-human IgM and phycoerythrin conjugated murine monoclonal anti-human FXIII antibody (a control) is added and the mixture is incubated at 37°C. Excess conjugate is removed in another wash cycle and the beads are re-suspended in wash buffer. The bead mixture then passes through the detector. The identity of the dyed beads is determined by the fluorescence of the dyes, and the amount of antibody captured by the antigen is determined by the fluorescence of the attached phycoerythrin. Raw data are calculated in relative fluorescence intensity (RFI).
Three additional dyed beads, Internal Standard Bead (ISB), Serum Verification Bead (SVB), and a Reagent Blank Bead (RBB) are present in each reaction mixture to verify detector response, the addition of serum to the reaction vessel, and the absence of significant nonspecific binding in serum, respectively.
The anti-phospholipid assays are calibrated using a set of calibrators supplied separately by Bio-Rad Laboratories. Results are calculated for both of the antibodies and are compared against their own respective cut-off. For anti-β2-glycoprotein I, the results are provided in units/mL (U/mL). The anti-cardiolipin results are similar except that the units are MPL-U/mL. The negative/positive assay cutoff for the two analytes of the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit is 20 units.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision testing of the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit on the BioPlex® 2200 instrument was performed in accordance with CLSI EP5-A2. Two serum and heparinized plasma panels consisting of samples spanning the measuring range were assayed in replicate twice daily over 20 days (n=80) expect for the mid negative samples were run over 10 days (n=40). The data were analyzed at an internal Bio-Rad site for within-run, between-run, between-day, and total precision and the standard deviation and percent coefficient of variation are summarized below:
Anti-Cardiolipin: Serum Samples
| Precision Sample | N | Mean MPL-U/mL | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 6.1 | 0.2 | 3.0% | 0.1 | 1.6% | 0.1 | 1.5% | 0.2 | 3.7% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 6.9 | 0.2 | 2.8% | 0.1 | 1.6% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.2 | 3.2% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 9.1 | 0.3 | 2.8% | 0.2 | 2.1% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.3 | 3.5% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 10.7 | 0.4 | 3.3% | 0.1 | 1.1% | 0.1 | 1.0% | 0.4 | 3.6% |
{6}
7
| Precision Sample | N | Mean MPL-U/mL | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| Negative Near Cut-off | 80 | 14.5 | 0.8 | 5.3% | 0.5 | 3.6% | 0.6 | 3.8% | 1.1 | 7.4% |
| Negative Near Cut-off | 80 | 15.6 | 0.9 | 6.0% | 0.2 | 1.1% | 0.1 | 0.4% | 1.0 | 6.1% |
| Near Cut-off | 80 | 17.5 | 1.1 | 6.3% | 0.2 | 1.0% | 0.8 | 4.5% | 1.4 | 7.9% |
| Near Cut-off | 80 | 19.6 | 1.3 | 6.4% | 0.4 | 2.1% | 0.9 | 4.3% | 1.6 | 8.0% |
| Low Positive | 80 | 22.6 | 1.0 | 4.5% | 0.8 | 3.5% | 1.0 | 4.6% | 1.7 | 7.3% |
| Low Positive | 80 | 22.7 | 1.3 | 5.7% | 0.8 | 3.4% | 1.1 | 4.8% | 1.9 | 8.2% |
| High Positive | 80 | 73.6 | 5.5 | 7.5% | 1.5 | 2.1% | 1.8 | 2.4% | 6.0 | 8.1% |
| High Positive | 80 | 79.1 | 3.7 | 4.7% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 2.1 | 2.7% | 4.3 | 5.4% |
| Pos Control | 80 | 62.9 | 2.3 | 3.7% | 1.9 | 3.0% | 1.2 | 2.0% | 3.2 | 5.2% |
Anti-Cardiolipin: Heparin Samples
| Precision Sample | N | Mean MPL-U/mL | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 6.8 | 0.2 | 2.7% | 0.1 | 2.1% | 0.0 | 0.7% | 0.2 | 3.4% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 7.4 | 0.2 | 3.0% | 0.1 | 1.3% | 0.1 | 1.4% | 0.3 | 3.6% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 10.4 | 0.3 | 3.1% | 0.3 | 2.5% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.4 | 4.0% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 10.7 | 0.3 | 2.8% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.2 | 2.1% | 0.4 | 3.5% |
{7}
| Precision Sample | N | Mean MPL-U/mL | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| Negative Near Cut-off | 80 | 13.6 | 0.6 | 4.6% | 0.2 | 1.6% | 0.4 | 3.2% | 0.8 | 5.8% |
| Negative Near Cut-off | 80 | 14.0 | 0.8 | 5.4% | 0.2 | 1.3% | 0.6 | 4.4% | 1.0 | 7.1% |
| Near Cut-off | 80 | 18.2 | 1.0 | 5.3% | 0.7 | 3.9% | 0.2 | 1.1% | 1.2 | 6.7% |
| Near Cut-off | 80 | 19.0 | 1.3 | 6.9% | 0.3 | 1.3% | 0.6 | 3.0% | 1.4 | 7.6% |
| Low Positive | 80 | 21.5 | 1.3 | 6.1% | 0.4 | 1.8% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.4 | 6.3% |
| Low Positive | 80 | 23.4 | 0.8 | 3.4% | 0.7 | 2.8% | 0.9 | 3.9% | 1.4 | 5.9% |
| High Positive | 80 | 72.7 | 3.2 | 4.4% | 1.4 | 1.9% | 2.1 | 2.9% | 4.1 | 5.6% |
| High Positive | 80 | 72.8 | 2.8 | 3.8% | 2.2 | 3.1% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 3.6 | 4.9% |
Anti- $\beta 2\mathrm{GPI}$ : Serum Samples
| Precision Sample | N | Mean U/mL | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 8.8 | 0.3 | 3.0% | 0.1 | 0.7% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.3 | 3.1% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 9.0 | 0.3 | 3.1% | 0.3 | 2.8% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.4 | 4.2% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 12.8 | 0.5 | 3.5% | 0.4 | 2.9% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.6 | 4.6% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 15.4 | 0.6 | 4.1% | 0.2 | 1.2% | 0.3 | 1.7% | 0.7 | 4.6% |
{8}
| Precision Sample | N | Mean U/mL | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| Negative Near Cut-off | 80 | 17.4 | 0.6 | 3.3% | 0.2 | 1.3% | 0.1 | 0.7% | 0.6 | 3.7% |
| Negative Near Cut-off | 80 | 17.7 | 0.7 | 3.8% | 0.4 | 2.1% | 0.4 | 2.1% | 0.9 | 4.8% |
| Near Cut-off | 80 | 20.6 | 0.9 | 4.2% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.5 | 2.6% | 1.0 | 4.9% |
| Near Cut-off | 80 | 21.4 | 0.8 | 3.6% | 0.4 | 2.0% | 0.6 | 2.7% | 1.1 | 4.9% |
| Low Positive | 80 | 23.5 | 0.7 | 3.1% | 0.7 | 2.7% | 0.7 | 2.9% | 1.2 | 5.1% |
| Low Positive | 80 | 23.5 | 0.9 | 3.9% | 0.5 | 2.0% | 0.9 | 3.7% | 1.4 | 5.8% |
| High Positive | 80 | 79.5 | 5.7 | 7.2% | 2.5 | 3.2% | 1.1 | 1.4% | 6.3 | 8.0% |
| High Positive | 80 | 85.5 | 3.9 | 4.6% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 2.0 | 2.4% | 4.4 | 5.2% |
| Pos Control | 80 | 52.1 | 2.3 | 4.4% | 1.7 | 3.2% | 1.4 | 2.7% | 3.2 | 6.0% |
Anti- $\beta 2\mathrm{GPI}$ : Heparin Samples
| Precision Sample | N | Mean U/mL | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 8.4 | 0.3 | 3.1% | 0.2 | 1.8% | 0.0 | 0.3% | 0.3 | 3.7% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 8.6 | 0.3 | 3.3% | 0.1 | 1.5% | 0.1 | 1.0% | 0.3 | 3.8% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 12.2 | 0.5 | 3.7% | 0.3 | 2.7% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.6 | 4.6% |
| Mid Negative | 40 | 13.1 | 0.4 | 2.8% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.2 | 1.5% | 0.4 | 3.2% |
{9}
| Precision Sample | N | Mean U/mL | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV | SD | CV |
| Negative Near Cut-off | 80 | 16.8 | 0.5 | 3.0% | 0.2 | 1.4% | 0.4 | 2.5% | 0.7 | 4.2% |
| Negative Near Cut-off | 80 | 17.0 | 0.7 | 3.9% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.5 | 2.7% | 0.8 | 4.7% |
| Near Cut-off | 80 | 20.3 | 0.6 | 3.0% | 0.6 | 2.9% | 0.0 | 0.2% | 0.9 | 4.2% |
| Near Cut-off | 80 | 20.9 | 0.8 | 3.9% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.5 | 2.3% | 0.9 | 4.5% |
| Low Positive | 80 | 23.3 | 0.9 | 3.9% | 0.3 | 1.1% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 1.0 | 4.1% |
| Low Positive | 80 | 24.0 | 0.6 | 2.4% | 0.4 | 1.7% | 0.6 | 2.6% | 0.9 | 3.9% |
| High Positive | 80 | 78.6 | 2.9 | 3.7% | 2.3 | 2.9% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 3.7 | 4.7% |
| High Positive | 80 | 79.0 | 3.5 | 4.5% | 1.5 | 1.9% | 1.4 | 1.8% | 4.1 | 5.2% |
A second smaller repeatability study was performed following EP15-A2 recommendations using all four sample matrices (serum, lithium heparin, sodium heparin and sodium citrate) to determine the within-run, between run and total precision of the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit. Studies were conducted internally at Bio-Rad. Each matrix had a least two samples that were negative, 2 near the cut-off, 2 low positive and 2 high positive for a total of 8 samples per matrix. Samples were tested in quadruplicate over 5 days for a total of 20 measurements per sample. Precision results for all samples (both serum and plasma) are summarized below:
Anti- $\beta 2\mathrm{GPI}$ IgM: Serum and Plasma
| Precision Sample | N | Concentration Range U/mL | Within Run (% CV) | | Between Run (% CV) | | Total (% CV) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max |
| Negative | 20 | 12 – 17.5 | 2.9% | 4.9% | 1.0% | 5.9% | 3.2% | 7.6% |
| Near Cut-off | 20 | 18.5 – 22.4 | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.8% | 6.5% | 2.9% | 10.1% |
| Low Positive | 20 | 52.8 – 56.8 | 4.2% | 8.3% | 0.0% | 3.0% | 4.3% | 8.3% |
| High Positive | 20 | 92.9 – 101.5 | 2.7% | 7.3% | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.6% | 7.3% |
{10}
Anti- aCL: Serum and Plasma
| Precision Sample | N | Concentration Range MPL-U/mL | Within Run (% CV) | | Between Run (% CV) | | Total (% CV) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max |
| Negative | 20 | 12.2 – 18.3 | 3.2% | 5.9% | 1.9% | 6.9% | 3.7% | 9.1% |
| Near Cut-off | 20 | 7.8 – 21.3 | 4.0% | 8.0% | 0.0% | 7.1% | 4.0% | 10.7% |
| Low Positive | 20 | 35.0 – 43.5 | 3.7% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 3.5% | 4.5% | 8.6% |
| High Positive | 20 | 64.6 – 80.9 | 2.7% | 7.7% | 0.0% | 3.6% | 4.2% | 7.7% |
A reproducibility study was performed to estimate the reproducibility between instrument, within run, between run and total precision. Precision was evaluated using five patient samples spanning the measuring range of both the $\beta 2\mathrm{GPI}$ IgM kit and aCL IgM kit using 3 reagent lots in 2 runs with 10 replicates per run on three Bioplex 2200 instruments for total of 60 data points per sample.
Anti-B2GPI IgM Lot-to-Lot Reproducibility Data:
| Precision Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %SD | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| APSQSM03 | 60 | 16.5 | 0.51 | 3.1 | 0.38 | 2.3 | 0.92 | 5.6 | 1.12 | 6.8 |
| APSQSM04 | 60 | 18.6 | 0.65 | 3.5 | 0.74 | 4.0 | 2.44 | 13.1 | 2.63 | 14.1 |
| APSQSM06 | 60 | 22.9 | 0.72 | 3.2 | 0.56 | 2.5 | 1.40 | 6.1 | 1.67 | 7.3 |
| APSQSM07 | 60 | 26.6 | 0.92 | 3.5 | 0.69 | 2.6 | 2.11 | 7.9 | 2.41 | 9.1 |
| APSQSM14 | 60 | 98.0 | 3.88 | 4.0 | 3.03 | 3.1 | 10.01 | 10.2 | 11.16 | 11.4 |
Anti-CL IgM Lot-to-Lot Reproducibility Data:
| Precision Sample | N | Mean (MPL-U/mL) | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %SD | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| APSQSM03 | 60 | 15.0 | 0.42 | 2.8 | 0.42 | 2.8 | 0.59 | 3.9 | 0.84 | 5.6 |
| APSQSM04 | 60 | 14.6 | 0.46 | 3.1 | 0.59 | 4.0 | 1.55 | 10.6 | 1.72 | 11.8 |
{11}
| Precision Sample | N | Mean (MPL-U/mL) | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %SD | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| APSQSM06 | 60 | 23.6 | 0.73 | 3.1 | 0.78 | 3.3 | 1.31 | 5.6 | 1.69 | 7.2 |
| APSQSM07 | 60 | 26.2 | 0.86 | 3.3 | 0.60 | 2.3 | 1.50 | 5.7 | 1.83 | 7.0 |
| APSQSM14 | 60 | 91.9 | 3.40 | 3.7 | 2.63 | 2.9 | 2.73 | 3.0 | 5.09 | 5.5 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Six APLS aCL and six a $\beta$ 2GPI IgM positive patient samples (three high and three mid-range) were tested to demonstrate linearity. These samples were diluted with immunodepleted serum according to CLSI EP06-A. Each sample and dilution was evaluated in replicates of four using one APLS IgM lot on one instrument. Linear and polynomial regression analysis of APLS IgM recovery vs. sample dilution was performed to determine if the dilution curves exhibit statistically significant nonlinear regression based on the CLSI guideline EP06-A.
The regression parameters (slope, intercept and $\mathbf{r}^2$ ) of the observed values vs. predicted values are show below.
| APLS IgM Assays | Sample | Conc. | Dilution range | Slope | Intercept | r2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| aCL IgM (MPL-U/mL) | 1 | 49.5 | 0.6 – 49.5 | 1.0000 | -0.0010 | 0.9931 |
| | 2 | 57.4 | 0.1 – 57.4 | 1.0005 | -0.0117 | 0.9914 |
| | 3 | 54.1 | 0.1 – 54.1 | 0.9992 | 0.0184 | 0.9915 |
| | 4 | 93.9 | 0.1 – 93.9 | 0.9999 | 0.0174 | 0.9954 |
| | 5 | 92.3 | 0.1 – 92.3 | 0.9995 | 0.0203 | 0.9985 |
| | 6 | 100.0 | 0.6 – 100.0 | 0.9998 | 0.0226 | 0.9925 |
| aβ2GPI IgM (U/mL) | 1 | 54.2 | 0.6 – 54.2 | 0.9996 | 0.0099 | 0.9942 |
| | 2 | 49.9 | 01. – 49.9 | 1.0009 | -0.0319 | 0.9933 |
| | 3 | 53.1 | 0.1 – 53.1 | 0.9996 | 0.0089 | 0.9952 |
| | 4 | 92.5 | 0.6 – 92.5 | 0.9996 | 0.0167 | 0.9978 |
| | 5 | 111.1 | 0.1 – 111.1 | 0.9998 | 0.0258 | 0.9980 |
| | 6 | 100.3 | 0.2 – 100.3 | 1.0003 | -0.0275 | 0.9985 |
{12}
The assay measuring range reported by each APLS IgM assay is shown below.
| BioPlex® 2200 APLS Assay | Assay reportable range |
| --- | --- |
| aCL IgM | 0.2 to 112.0 MPL-U/mL |
| aβ2GPI IgM | 0.2 to 112.0 U/mL |
Over-Range (OR) results may be generated for values greater than the reportable measuring range and results are reported as > 112 MPL-U/mL for aCL and > 112 U/mL for aβ2GPI IgM.
High dose hook effect:
Not Applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
There is no international or certified reference material available for APLS aCL and aβ2GPI IgM. The calibrators are assigned relative arbitrary units (U/mL for aβ2GPI, and MPL-U/mL for aCL).
Value Assignment:
The calibrators are manufactured independently from the controls, and are stabilized with <0.3% ProClin® 300, <0.1% sodium benzoate, and <0.1% sodium azide. Calibrator assignment is established for matched lots of BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit and calibrators using a master set of calibrators as reference and replicate analyses on multiple BioPlex® 2200 instruments. The BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Reagent Kit is calibrated using a set of four distinct serum based calibrators for aCL and aβ2GPI IgM, which are used to establish points of reference for determining the presence of APLS IgM in human specimens.
The negative control has been tested to give results with values below the cut-off for each assay. The positive control is prepared by blending human disease state serum with negative serum matrix and is manufactured to give results with values above the assay cut-off. The value assignment of the Control Set is derived by testing each control on three BioPlex® 2200 Analyzers with at least two kit lots. For each control level, three vials are tested in replicates of five using each of the kit lots and each analyzer. This testing is performed on three analyzers for a total of 45 replicates per reagent lot. The total number of replicates for each control level is 90 when two reagent lots are used and 135 when three reagent lots are used. The mean value of the control is calculated using data from all reagent lots, and the acceptable range of is based on the inter-assay precision specification (i.e. 2x inter-assay precision).
The target values and ranges (in parenthesis) for the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Calibrator and Control sets are listed below.
13
{13}
| Calibrator Level | BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | aCL IgM MPL-U/mL | aβ2GPI IgM U/mL |
| 1 | ≤6 | ≤6 |
| 2 | 14 | 14 |
| 3 | 28 | 28 |
| 4 | 112 | 112 |
| Control Level | BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | aCL IgM MPL-U/mL | aβ2GPI IgM U/mL |
| Negative | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Positive | 56 | 56 |
Stability: Stability studies have been performed to support the following claims:
Calibrator and Control: BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Control and Calibrator Sets: Calibrator Open Vial Stability (2 to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ), 30 days from first opening; Control Open Vial Stability (2 to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ), 60 days from first opening; Calibration Curve Onboard Stability, 30 days; Calibrators and Controls Real Time Stability (2 to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ), 24 months; labeled as until expiration date; Calibrators and Controls Accelerated Stability (2 to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ), 2.5 years predicted; Calibrators and Controls Freeze-thaw (-20 or $-70^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ), 5-freeze thaw cycles.
Kit Stability: BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Kit: Real Time (unopened) Kit Stability, 24 months or until the date of expiration when stored unopened on the instrument or at 2 to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ; The Open kit claim is 60 days.
Sample Stability: Sample stability studies were also performed: Sample stability fresh (2 to $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ), 7 days; Sample stability frozen (-20 or $-70^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ), 24 months; Sample Freeze-thaw (-20 or $-70^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ), up to 3-freeze thaw cycles acceptable.
# d. Detection limit:
To determine detection limits for the BioPlex® 2200 IgM kit, three high titer negative serum samples (negative below cut-off) ranged from 14.53 to $16.91\mathrm{U / mL}$ for aB2GPI IgM and 8.73 to $14.48\mathrm{MPL - U / mL}$ for aCL IgM were diluted in various increments in analyte free serum. Each dilution plus analyte free serum was assayed daily in replicates of ten for a period of five days (50 data points total per dilution) on one BioPlex 2200 instrument.
All testing was conducted internally at Bio-Rad using equations from CLSI EP17-A to determine analytical sensitivity. LoD was calculated as “ $\mathrm{LoD} = \mathrm{LoB} + \mathrm{c}\beta \mathrm{SDs}$ ”. For this calculation, the LoB was calculated at the 95th percentile of negative samples. cβ is the 95th percentile of the standard Gaussian distribution with a correction factor applied to account for the biased estimate of the population standard deviation (1.645/(1-1/(4xf)), where f is the degrees of freedom of the estimated standard deviation SDs. LoQ = LoD if the %CV of LoD is less than or equal to 20%;
{14}
otherwise, LoQ was calculated from the regression line of the LoD standard deviation versus the analyte concentration. The results of LoQ, LoD and LoB are summarized in the table below:
| BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM Assay | LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| aCL (MPL-U/mL) | 0.0974 | 0.13 | 0.2 |
| aβ2GPI (U/mL) | 0.1044 | 0.13 | 0.2 |
e. Analytical specificity:
Interfering Substances:
An interfering substances study was conducted to evaluate the potential interference of specific endogenous and exogenous substances with the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM assay according to CLSI EP7-A2. Samples were prepared by blending a pool of negative human serum with samples positive for aCL IgM and aβ2GPI IgM to achieve approximate values of 10, 20, 60 and 100 MPL for aCL IgM and 10, 20, 60, 100 U/mL for aβ2GPI IgM with interferent or blank. Test and control samples were evaluated in alternating order in replicates of ten each. Substances are considered interfering if their presence in a sample results in more than ±20% deviation in quantitation relative to the value determined in the absence of the substance. No interference was observed with any of the substances tested. The substances and the maximum levels tested are shown in the table below:
| Substance | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | ≤ 500 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin, Unconjugated | ≤ 20 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin, Conjugated | ≤ 30 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | ≤ 500 mg/dL |
| Red Blood Cells | ≤ 0.4% (v/v) |
| Gamma Globulin | ≤ 6 g/dL |
| Triglycerides | ≤ 3300 mg/dL |
| Protein (total) | ≤ 12 g/dL |
| Beta-Carotene | ≤ 0.6 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid | ≤ 3 mg/dL |
| Lithium Heparin | ≤ 8000 units/dL |
| Sodium Heparin | ≤ 8000 units/dL |
| Sodium Citrate | ≤ 1000 mg/dL |
Cross-Reactivity:
A cross-reactivity study was performed to determine if samples from individuals with various disease states and other potentially cross-reactants interfere with test results from the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit. Samples from individual with known disease states for potential cross reactivity listed in the table below were evaluated with the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit. This cohort is different from samples used in
{15}
the method comparison and clinical studies. The table below shows the number (N) of samples containing potential cross reactants as disease state evaluated by the BioPlex® APLS IgM. The cross reactivity was obtained as the positivity rate from the ratio of the number of samples scored positive by the BioPlex® APLS IgM assays to the total number of cross reactant samples evaluated. A positivity rate must be ≤ 20% for a minimum of 10 samples for each non-APS disease state to be considered not cross reactive.
| Cross Reactive Disease State | N | aCL IgM | | aβ2GPI IgM | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | # Positive | % Positive | # Positive | % Positive |
| Systemic Lupus Erythematosus | 34 | 2 | 5.9% | 2 | 5.9% |
| Scleroderma | 20 | 3 | 15.0% | 3 | 15.0% |
| Sjogrens | 22 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Crohn's Disease | 21 | 2 | 9.5% | 2 | 9.5% |
| Ulcerative Colitis | 20 | 1 | 5.0% | 1 | 5.0% |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis | 12 | 1 | 8.3% | 1 | 8.3% |
| Syphilis | 15 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
f. Assay cut-off:
The cutoff value and assignment of the calibrators are determined by performing concordance testing and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis. The study to determine the APLS IgM assay cutoff is comprised of two sample groups – one clinical cohort has 103 samples from patients diagnosed as primary and secondary APS and 123 from non-APS disease control donors. It was later confirmed by testing 208 samples from apparently normal healthy donors.
The cut-off was established to achieve a clinical specificity of 99% while accepting the resultant clinical sensitivity. The criteria for choosing a cutoff at the 99th percentile of a normal healthy population is derived from the "International Consensus Statement on an Update of the Classification Criteria for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)", Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2006) 4, 295.
A cutoff of 20 MPL-U/mL for aCL IgM and 20 U/mL for aβ2GPI IgM was established.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The performance of the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit was evaluated including 199 patients diagnosed with primary or secondary APS, 346 patients with other rheumatic or non-APS disease. Results in the measuring range and 10% of diluted total samples of both the new and the predicate immunoassays are compared.
{16}
Results are summarized in the tables below:
| | Predicate IgM Kit (aCL: 1.0 – 15480 U/mL) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| aCL IgM (0.2–112 MPL-U/mL) | Positive | 77 | 1* | 78 |
| | Negative | 28** | 403 | 431 |
| | Total | 105 | 404 | 509 |
* 1 Scleredoma
** 2 Gout, 2 Scleroderma, 4 SLE, 3 UC 4 RA, 6 PAPS, 7 SAPS
aCL IgM Positive Agreement = 73.3% (77/105) (95% CI: 64.2–80.9%)
aCL IgM Negative Agreement = 99.5% (403/404) (95% CI: 98.6 – 100.0%)
aCL IgM Overall Agreement = 94.3% (480/509) (95% CI: 91.9 – 96%)
| | Predicate IgM Kit (aβ2GPI: 1.1 – 841 U/mL) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| aβ2GPI IgM (0.2–112 U/mL) | Positive | 79 | 15* | 94 |
| | Negative | 4** | 233 | 237 |
| | Total | 83 | 248 | 331 |
* 3 Scleroderma, 1 RA, 6 PAPS, 5 SAPS
** 1 Osteoarthritis, 1 Scleroderma, 1 PAPS, 1 SAPS
aβ2GPI IgM Positive Agreement = 95.2% (79/83) (95% CI: 88.3 – 98.1%)
aβ2GPI IgM Negative Agreement = 94.0% (233/248) (95% CI: 90.3 – 96.3%)
aβ2GPI IgM Overall Agreement = 94.3% (312/331) (95% CI: 91.2 – 96.3%)
b. Matrix comparison:
Testing for matrix effects was conducted using more than 38 matched sets of serum and sodium (Na) citrate, lithium (Li) heparin, and sodium heparin plasma samples drawn from the same donor in accordance with CLSI EP9-A2. The samples were spiked with aCL IgM or aβ2GPI IgM positive sera as necessary in order to assemble a panel of samples to cover the measuring range of the assay. All samples were evaluated in singlicate in separate runs on two different BioPlex 2200 instruments. Plasma values were compared to matched serum values. Anticoagulants were considered non-interfering if the plasma result was within 20% of the serum result which was equivalent to the linear regression of aβ2GPI IgM or aCL IgM values from matched serum versus plasma samples has a slope of 1.00 ± 0.2, a y-intercept of 0.0 ± 6.0 and a correlation coefficient between 0.980 and 1.000. The regression correlation parameters for the slopes, intercepts and correlation coefficient (r) are summarized below:
{17}
| Matrix Comparison | N | BioPlex® APLS Assay | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lithium Heparin vs. Serum | 38 | aCL IgM | 1.0106 (0.9808, 1.0405) | -0.3053 (-2.0421, 1.4315) | 0.9962 |
| | 38 | aβ2GPI IgM | 0.9991 (0.9682, 1.0301) | 0.3054 (-1.5299, 2.1405) | 0.9958 |
| Sodium Heparin vs. Serum | 38 | aCL IgM | 1.0369 (0.9786, 1.0953) | -0.6412 (-4.0349, 2.7525) | 0.9864 |
| | 38 | aβ2GPI IgM | 1.0271 (0.9750, 1.0779) | -0.2328 (-3.3212, 2.8555) | 0.9889 |
| Sodium Citrate vs. Serum | 38 | aCL IgM | 1.0494 (1.0190, 1.0779) | -0.9676 (-2.7381, 0.8029) | 0.9963 |
| | 38 | aβ2GPI IgM | 1.0354 (1.0082, 1.0627) | -0.4738 (-2.0890, 1.1414) | 0.9970 |
# 3. Clinical studies:
# a. Clinical Sensitivity and specificity:
The clinical studies involved testing 545 specimens including 199 from patients diagnosed with primary or secondary APS and 346 from non-APS disease control patients. The BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM sensitivity and specificity are shown below:
| | Clinical Diagnosis | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| BioPlex® 2200 APLS aCL IgM | Positive | 67 | 11 | 78 |
| | Negative | 132 | 335 | 467 |
| | Total | 199 | 346 | 545 |
aCL IgM Sensitivity $= 33.7\%$ (67/199) $(95\% \mathrm{CI}:27.5 - 40.5\%)$
aCL IgM Specificity $= 96.8\%$ (335/346) $(95\% \mathrm{CI}:94.4 - 98.2\%)$
| | Clinical Diagnosis | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| BioPlex® 2200 APLS aβ2GPI IgM | Positive | 80 | 14 | 94 |
| | Negative | 119 | 332 | 451 |
| | Total | 199 | 346 | 545 |
aβ2GPI IgM Sensitivity $= 40.2\%$ (80/199) $(95\% \mathrm{CI}:33.6 - 47.1\%)$
aβ2GPI IgM Specificity $= 96.0\%$ (332/346) $(95\% \mathrm{CI}:93.3 - 97.6\%)$
The results of the BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit in each of disease category are shown below.
{18}
| Disease Category | Number Enrolled | aCL IgM | | aβ2GPI IgM | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | # pos | % pos | # pos | % pos |
| Primary APS (PAPS) | 123 | 43 | 35.0% | 50 | 40.7% |
| Secondary APS (SAPS) | 76 | 24 | 31.6% | 30 | 39.5% |
| Total Diagnosed APS | 199 | 67 | 33.7% | 80 | 40.2% |
| | | | | | |
| Submitted for APS testing | 243 | 11 | 4.5% | 14 | 5.8% |
| Apparently Healthy Subject | 300 | 7 | 2.3% | 3 | 0.01% |
| | | | | | |
| Systemic Lupus Erythematosus | 101 | 4 | 3.96% | 5 | 4.95% |
| Scleroderma | 24 | 1 | 4.2% | 3 | 12.5% |
| Sjogrens | 21 | 1 | 4.8% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Crohn's Disease | 21 | 1 | 4.8% | 1 | 4.8% |
| Ulcerative Colitis | 18 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis | 90 | 3 | 3.33% | 4 | 4.44% |
| Syphilis | 15 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| CREST | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Fibromyalgia | 19 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gout | 14 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Inflammatory Arthritis | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Osteoarthritis | 11 | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 9.1% |
| Wegeners Granulomatosis | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. is not applicable):
Not applicable
{19}
4. Clinical cut-off:
See Assay Cutoff
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Three hundred samples from apparently healthy donors including 132 males ranging in age from 7 to 85 and 168 females ranging in age from 14 to 83 were tested with BioPlex® 2200 APLS IgM kit. The number of positive, mean value and 99th percentile of the BioPlex® APLS IgM results are shown below.
| APLS Assay | N (%Positive) | Mean | 99^{th} percentile |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| aCL IgM | 7 (2.3%) | 3.0 MPL-U/mL | 27.9 MPL-U/mL |
| aβ2GPI IgM | 3 (1.0%) | 2.5 U/mL | 19.4 U/mL |
Results of < 20.0 MPL-U/mL for aCL < 20.0 U/mL for aβ2GPI are reported as negative and results > 20.0 MPL-U/mL for aCL and > 20.0 U/mL for aβ2GPI are reported as positive.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
20
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.