K130427 · Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. · KWQ · Jun 5, 2013 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K130427
Device Name
PIONEER ASPECT ANTERIOR CERVICAL PLATE SYSTEM
Applicant
Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.
Product Code
KWQ · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 5, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3060
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System is intended for anterior cervical fixation (C2-C7) for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (DDD) (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, deformities or curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, and failed previous fusion.
Device Story
The Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System is a spinal fixation device consisting of static plates (10-105mm) and fixed/variable self-tapping and self-drilling screws (04.0-04.5mm diameter; 10-20mm length). Used by surgeons in an operating room setting to stabilize the cervical spine (C2-C7) via an anterior approach. Plates feature an integrated Nitinol 'retaining clip' screw retention mechanism. The system provides mechanical stabilization to the vertebral bodies to facilitate fusion. Clinical benefit is derived from the structural support provided to the spine during the healing process.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical testing included ASTM F1717 dynamic and static compression bending and torsion testing, ASTM F543 screw pull-out testing, and internal protocols for screw pull-through and retention characteristics. Results demonstrated mechanical strength equivalent to or better than predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Plates and screws manufactured from ASTM F136 titanium alloy; screw retention clips manufactured from ASTM F2063 Nitinol. System utilizes static plates and fixed/variable self-tapping/self-drilling screws. Mechanical fixation principle. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for anterior cervical fixation (C2-C7) in patients with degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, trauma (fracture/dislocation), spinal stenosis, deformities (scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, or failed previous fusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A spinal intervertebral body fixation orthosis is a device intended to be implanted made of titanium. It consists of various vertebral plates that are punched into each of a series of vertebral bodies. An eye-type screw is inserted in a hole in the center of each of the plates. A braided cable is threaded through each eye-type screw. The cable is tightened with a tension device and it is fastened or crimped at each eye-type screw. The device is used to apply force to a series of vertebrae to correct “sway back,” scoliosis (lateral curvature of the spine), or other conditions.
Predicate Devices
Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System (K111528)
Synthes Spine Small Stature Anterior Cervical Plate System (K971883)
DePuy Spine, Inc. SKYLINE Anterior Cervical Plate System (K103491/K052552)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) SUMMARY (as required by 21 CFR 807.92(c))
#### Sponsor: Manufacturer: Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. 375 River Park Circle Marquette, MI 49855 Official Contact: Sarah McIntyre, Regulatory Affairs Associate II Phone: (906) 225-5861 Fax: (906) 226-4459 Date prepared: May 20, 2013 Name: Trade/Device Name: Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System Common Name: Anterior Cervical Plate System Classification: Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3060 Regulation Name: Spinal intervertebral body fixation orthosis Product Code: KWO Regulatory Class: Class II Description: The Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System consists of an assortment of plates and screws. The screws are used to secure the plates to the vertebral bodies of the cervical spine through an anterior approach. The system consists of static plates in lengths that range from 10-105mm and include one, two, three, four, and five level designs. The plates have an integrated screw retention mechanism. The system includes fixed/variable self-tapping and self-drilling screws in 04.0 or 04.5mm, ranging from 10-20mm in length. The purpose of this submission is to communicate the next generation Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System to the Agency. Intended Use: The Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System is intended for anterior cervical fixation (C2-C7) for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (DDD) (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, deformities or curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, and failed previous fusion. The plates and screws are manufactured from ASTM F 136 titanium alloy. The screw Material: retention mechanism ("retaining clip") of the plate is manufactured from ASTM F2063 Nitinol. Performance For a determination of substantial equivalence, non-clinical mechanical tests including ASTM Data: F1717 dynamic and static compression bending and torsion static testing were completed. In addition, ASTM F543 screw pull-out testing and testing per internal protocols to assess screw pull through and retention characteristics were performed. Performance testing showed that the mechanical strength of the subject system is equivalent to or better than predicate devices
### K 130427 Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System
Page 1 of 2
and is therefore sufficient for the intended use.
JUN 5 2013
{1}------------------------------------------------
| Comparison to<br>Predicate Devices | The Sponsor is claiming substantial equivalence to the following legally marketed predicate<br>devices: |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | K111528 Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System (24-series, SE 8/24/11)<br>K 100708 Pioneer Anterior Cervical Plate System (SE 6/4/10)<br>K083663 Pioneer PACP (SE 2/25/09)<br>K971883 Synthes Spine Small Stature Anterior Cervical Plate System (SE 10/16/97)<br>�<br>K 103491/K052552 DePuy Spine, Inc. SKYLINE Anterior Cervical Plate System<br>(SE 2/14/11) |
| | The subject Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System (27-series) has indications for use<br>identical to those of the predicate Pioneer Anterior Cervical Plate Systems and employs the<br>same principles of operation. Identical materials are used in predicate systems. A vailable<br>screw lengths, screw diameters, plate prominence and width, and plate types (one, two, three,<br>four and five-level; static) fall within the range of predicate devices. The differences between<br>the subject and predicate device do not affect the substantial equivalence of the device, as<br>demonstrated by a full battery of performance testing. |
| Performance and<br>SE .<br>Determination: | Based on the supporting documentation within this premarket notification, the subject system<br>demonstrates substantial equivalence to the listed predicate devices and is expected to be as<br>safe, as effective, and perform as well as or better than the predicate devices. |
.
:
. .
.
.
.
:
: : :
.
. . . . .
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three stripes forming its body and wings. The eagle is facing right. Encircling the eagle is the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
June 5, 2013
Pioneer Surgical Technology, Incorporated % Ms. Sarah MoIntyre Regulatory Affairs Associate II 375 River Park Circle Marquette, Michigan, 49855
Re: K130427
Trade/Device Name: Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3060 Regulation Name: Spinal intervertebral body fixation orthosis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KWQ Dated: March 5, 2013 Received: March 7, 2013
Dear Ms. McIntyre:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). "You may; therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Ms. Sarah McIntyre
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
For
Sincerely yours,
# rin Keith
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use Statement
510(k) Number (if known): K130427
Device Name: Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System
Indications:
The Pioneer Aspect Anterior Cervical Plate System is intended for anterior cervical fixation (C2-C7) for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (DDD) (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, deformities or curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, and failed previous fusion.
> V Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
Over-the-Counter Use
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
OR
#### Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Anton-E-Dmitriev, PhD-Division of Orthopedic Devices
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.