K130253 · Beckman Coulter, Inc. · PER · Jul 15, 2013 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K130253
Device Name
TQ-PREP WORKSTATION, PREPPLUS 2 WORKSTATION
Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Product Code
PER · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jul 15, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.2750
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K130253 · Jul 15, 2013
TQ-PREP WORKSTATION, PREPPLUS 2 WORKSTATION
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Patient samples (clinical cohort)
Patient samples were used to evaluate the accuracy and method comparison of the TQ-Prep and PrepPlus 2 workstations against predicate devices, following CLSI EP09-A2 guidelines.
Accuracy / Method Comparison; Method comparison study using patient samples per CLSI EP09-A2
Clinical patient samples
Predicate device
Accuracy and bias estimation
Indications for Use
The COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation is intended to prepare leukocytes from whole blood for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use when used with the COULTER ImmunoPrep Reagent System and cleared Beckman Coulter IVD applications on cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers. Pipetting of ImmunoPrep Reagent System (lyse, stabilizer, and fixative reagents) to samples prepared either manually or with the COULTER PrepPlus 2 sample preparation device to achieve lysis of whole blood samples. Use of COULTER TQPrep with cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers is described in each application's Instructions for Use. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only. The COULTER PrepPlus 2 when used in combination with the COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation, is intended to prepare human whole blood for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use with cleared Beckman Coulter IVD applications on cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers. Pipetting blood, cleared Beckman Coulter IVD reagents and Flow-Count Fluorospheres to prepare samples for flow cytometric analysis. Use of PrepPlus 2 with cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers is described in each application's Instructions for Use. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only.
Device Story
The COULTER TQ-Prep and PrepPlus 2 are automated sample preparation workstations for flow cytometry. The PrepPlus 2 is a microprocessor-controlled pipetting/diluting system that aspirates and dispenses blood, reagents, and fluorospheres into test tubes. The TQ-Prep automates the addition of ImmunoPrep reagents (lyse, stabilizer, fixative) to samples. The TQ-Prep features a multi-tube carousel loader (32-tube capacity) and a tube lifter/vortex mixer (1400-1800 rpm). The system is operated via a touch screen on the TQ-Prep, which controls both units. The output is a prepared sample tube ready for analysis on a flow cytometer. These devices are used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel to standardize sample preparation, reduce manual handling, and improve consistency in flow cytometric assays, ultimately benefiting patients by providing reliable, reproducible diagnostic results.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study (n=130) across 3 sites compared manual preparation/Q-Prep vs. PrepPlus 2/TQ-Prep. Primary endpoints: absolute counts and percentages of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+, CD3-CD56+, and CD19+ cells. Results showed high correlation (r=0.981-0.998) and bias within ±40 cells/μL or ±13% for absolute counts. Precision study (CLSI EP5-A2) over 23 days (n=276) confirmed repeatability and reproducibility within specifications. Carryover studies (CLSI H26-A2) confirmed <1% carryover.
Technological Characteristics
Microprocessor-controlled robotic pipetting and lysing system. PrepPlus 2: 3-axis stepper motor system, Teflon-coated probe, 1.0 mL syringes. TQ-Prep: Reaction carousel, vortex mixer (1400-1800 rpm), reagent delivery head. Connectivity: Touch screen interface, disk drive for panel definition software. Sterilization: Not applicable (reagent-based processing). Materials: Polypropylene daughter tubes, Teflon-coated probes.
Indications for Use
Indicated for preparation of human whole blood samples for flow cytometric analysis. Used for pipetting blood, reagents, and fluorospheres (PrepPlus 2) and for lysing whole blood samples (TQ-Prep). Intended for use with cleared Beckman Coulter IVD applications and flow cytometers.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A pipetting and diluting system for clinical use is a device intended to provide an accurately measured volume of liquid at a specified temperature for use in certain test procedures. This generic type of device system includes serial, manual, automated, and semi-automated dilutors, pipettors, dispensers, and pipetting stations.
Predicate Devices
Q-Prep (k874188)
Manual Pipette
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY INSTRUMENT ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k130253
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Manufacturer and Instrument Name:
Beckman Coulter COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation
Beckman Coulter COULTER PrepPlus 2
D. Type of Test or Tests Performed:
Specimen Processors
E. System Descriptions:
1. Device Description:
COULTER PrepPlus 2
The COULTER PrepPlus 2 is an automated microprocessor-controlled pipetting and diluting system designed for automating sample preparation. It is capable of aspirating and dispensing whole blood samples, Beckman Coulter cleared flow cytometric IVD reagents and Flow-Count Fluorspheres. The PrepPlus 2 uses 12-tube specimen cassettes to hold patient samples. The PrepPlus 2 instrument can pierce the caps of specimen tubes and aliquot the specimens into daughter tubes.
COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation
The COULTER ImmunoPrep Reagent System is used with the COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation to prepare leukocytes from whole blood for measurements on cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers.
Prior to placement on the TQ-Prep Workstation, the user prepares the whole blood specimens according to the monoclonal antibody reagent IFU by adding the specified volume of specimen and monoclonal antibody reagent to 12 x 75 mm test tubes, vortex mixing, and incubating for the specified times (this can be done manually or with the PrepPlus2). Up to 32 samples containing the premixed sample of blood and antibody are presented to the TQ-Prep Workstation from a carousel capable of holding up to 32 test tubes. Then the TQ-Prep Workstation automatically adds, in this order:
- ImmunoPrep A Reagent – an erythrocytic lysing reagent which causes
{1}
simultaneous rapid destruction of the erythrocytes while leaving the leukocytes intact
- ImmunoPrep B Reagent – a leukocyte stabilizer which stops the action of the lysing reagent (ImmunoPrep A), and
- ImmunoPrep C Reagent – a cell membrane fixative which fixes the cell membranes preserving the form and structure of the leukocytes.
The TQ-Prep vortex mixes the sample with the addition of each reagent for specified times. Upon completion of specimen processing on the TQ-Prep Workstation, the samples are removed from the device and presented separately to a flow cytometer for analysis.
## 2. Principles of Operation:
### COULTER PrepPlus 2
The PrepPlus 2 is a robotic module which has three functional axes: X/Y/Z. These axes are driven by stepper motors which are controlled by microprocessors mounted on printed circuit boards. The PrepPlus 2 is designed to move its sample probe tip to specific locations, detect liquid, and aspirate or dispense liquid. The PrepPlus 2 uses 12-tube specimen cassettes to hold patient samples. Only one orientation is permitted with respect to cassette introduction to the instrument. Orientation of the cassette on the device is controlled by the shape of the cassette and the receiving cradle and locking handle on the PrepPlus 2. It is physically impossible to seat the cassette onto the cradle in any orientation except the correct one. Specimen loading order on the device is identified by the numbers on the top of the cassette receiver as shown in the image below. The front side cassette orders tubes from 1-12 in a left to right orientation. The back side cassette orders tubes from 13-24 from right to left. There are two software programs that come with the PrepPlus 2:
- Operating System: This is loaded into the TQ-Prep Workstation when the PrepPlus 2 is installed. The user runs both the PrepPlus 2 and the TQ-Prep Workstation from the TQ-Prep Workstation touch screen commands.
- Panel Definition software: This is provided on $3\frac{1}{2}$ in. disks. The user can load it into any computer that fits the requirements defined in the product labeling. This software allows user to define panels, reagent racks, and control/calibrator racks.
### COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation
The TQ-Prep Workstation has a system microprocessor located on the Control Interface card controls the motors, sensors, syringes, the cover/lid interlock switches, reagent level sense probes and an internal communication link to the system microprocessor assembly.
The TQ-Prep Workstation PREP I system is partitioned into the following modules:
- MQP Module: consists of assemblies which include electronics and mechanisms to rotate the reaction carousel, to move the reaction tube under the reagent delivery head, to move the reagent delivery head to the delivery position, to dispense lyse, fixative and stabilizing reagent to the reaction tube, to mix the
{2}
reaction tube, and to remove reagent prime fluid to waste. The chassis and door consists of mechanical elements which provide structural support and protection for the instrument components. The covers and skins provide cosmetic value. The hardware user interface consists of a touch screen display.
- Software Module: consists of program instructions and data to control the operation of the MQP and User Interface modules.
- Reagents Module: consists of the current ImmunoPrep reagents lysing agent, fixative and stabilizing reagents and the Option reagent (distilled water).
3. Modes of Operation:
Semi-Automated
4. Specimen Identification:
Manual, controlled by operator.
5. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Specimens are whole blood specimens collected into approved tubes
6. Calibration:
Not applicable.
7. Quality Control:
The accuracy of the COULTER TQ-Prep and PrepPlus 2 Systems depend on the laboratory following the quality control instructions for Beckman Coulter cleared flow cytometric IVD reagents, the ImmunoPrep Reagent system in context of the Beckman Coulter flow cytometer system
8. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and Software Development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No ☐
F. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.2750, Pipetting and Diluting System for Clinical Use
{3}
2. Classification:
Class I
3. Product code:
PER, Automated pipetting, diluting and specimen processing workstations for flow cytometric analysis
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
G. Intended Use:
1. Indication(s) for Use:
COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation
Intended Use:
The COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation is intended to prepare leukocytes from whole blood for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use when used with the COULTER ImmunoPrep Reagent System and cleared Beckman Coulter IVD applications on cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers.
Indications for Use:
Pipetting of ImmunoPrep Reagent System (lyse, stabilizer, and fixative reagents) to samples prepared either manually or with the COULTER PrepPlus 2 sample preparation device to achieve lysis of whole blood samples. Use of COULTER TQPrep with cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers is described in each application's Instructions for Use. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only.
COULTER PrepPlus 2
Intended Use:
The COULTER PrepPlus 2 when used in combination with the COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation, is intended to prepare human whole blood for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use with cleared Beckman Coulter IVD applications on cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers.
Indications for Use:
Pipetting blood, cleared Beckman Coulter IVD reagents and Flow-Count Fluorospheres to prepare samples for flow cytometric analysis. Use of PrepPlus 2 with cleared Beckman Coulter flow cytometers is described in each application's Instructions for Use. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only.
2. Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4
{4}
H. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate Device Name(s) and 510(k) numbers:
| New Device | Predicate | Manufacturer | 510(k) Number |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TQ-Prep | Q-Prep | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | k874188 |
| PrepPlus 2 | Manual Pipette | Various | Not applicable |
2. Comparison with Predicate Device:
COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation:
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate |
| | COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation | Q-Prep (k874188) |
| Intended Use | The COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation, when used with the COULTER ImmunoPrep Reagent System, is intended to prepare leukocytes from whole blood for flow cytometric analysis on the Beckman Coulter flow cytometers as described in the Indications for Use. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use | Q-PREP is used to prepare leukocytes for immunofluorescence measurements on optical flow cytometers. |
| Manufacturer | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Same |
| Controlling software | The system microprocessor (386) assembly controls the touch screen, disk drive, power indicator, beeping device, and an internal communication link to the Control Interface card.
A microcontroller, located on the Control Interface card, controls the motors, sensors, syringes, the cover/lid interlock switches, reagent level sense probes and an internal communication link to the system microprocessor assembly. | The timing electronics are on a single circuit board. They control the syringe delivery order, individual syringe priming cycles, continuous mix cycle, cycle reagent addition and mixing, and stop cycle. |
| Lyse Reagents | ImmunoPrep A: Erythrocyte Lysing Reagent
ImmunoPrep B: Stabilizing Reagent
ImmunoPrep C: Cell Membrane Fixative | Same |
{5}
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate |
| | COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation | Q-Prep (k874188) |
| Lyse Reagent Volume Range | ImmunoPrep A: 0.600 mL ± 5%
ImmunoPrep B: 0.265 mL ± 5%
ImmunoPrep C: 0.100 mL ± 5% | Same |
| Timing | Premix: 2 ± 1 sec
Lysing: 8 ± 1 sec
Stabilizing: 10 ± 1 sec
Fixative: 10 ± 1 sec | Same |
| Syringe Type | Stepper Motor Tri-Continent Syringes | CAM-driven displacement syringes |
| Mixing | The tube lifter/vortex mixer uniformly first lifts the tube up into the dispensing head, then mixes reagents in the sample.
The mixer rotates at 1400-1800 rpm. | The mixer has a rotating arm that turns the bottom of the 12 x 75 mm test tube while a clip holds the top of the test tube in a fixed position. A circular rubber grommet holds the test tube in the arm.
The arm rotates at a rate of 1400 to 1800 rpm. |
| Sample Introduction | Automated presentation to sample processing area with Multi-tube Carousel Loader (MCL) from 32 test tube (12 x 75 mm) capacity carousel | Manual presentation into a tube location on front of instrument via tube access door. Single 12 x 75 mm tube only. |
| Sample Identification | Manual, controlled by operator. | Same |
| Quality Control Techniques | Gravimetric calibration | Same |
COULTER PrepPlus 2:
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate |
| | COULTER PrepPlus 2 | Manual Pipette |
| Intended Use | The COULTER PrepPlus 2, when used in combination with the COULTER TQ-Prep, is intended to prepare human whole blood for flow cytometric analysis on Beckman Coulter flow cytometers as described in the Indications for Use. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. | Delivery of a specified volume of liquid.
In the tetraCHROME reagent application, it delivers whole blood, ImmunoTrol and ImmunoTrol Low Cells, tetraCHROME reagents, and Flow-Count Fluorospheres. |
{6}
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device
COULTER PrepPlus 2 | Predicate
Manual Pipette |
| Manufacturer | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Various |
| Controlling software | Operating System – Loaded into the COULTER TQ-Prep Workstation. The user runs both the PrepPlus 2 and the TQ-Prep Workstation from the TQ-Prep Workstation touch screen commands.
Panel Definition software – This software allows the definition of panels, reagent racks, and control/calibrator racks. Stand alone Panel Definition software also available. | Not applicable |
| Sample Identification | Manual, controlled by operator. | Same |
| Sample Introduction | Automated presentation with Multi-tube Carousel Loader (MCL) from 32 test tube (12 x 75 mm) capacity carousel | Manual presentation. |
| Sample Contact Material | Teflon-coated sample probe | Polypropylene disposable tip |
| Cleaning Cycle Between Samples | Executed with IsoFlow Sheath Fluid in wash station after each liquid-handling function. Once daily COULTER CLENZ cleaning agent cleans and rinses the sample probe to prevent protein build-up. | Pipette tip replaced between samples |
| Volume Range | 5 μL to 1,000 μL. (Volumes over 500 μL are delivered in multiple aliquots. Maximum aliquot volume is 500 μL.) | Manual, controlled by operator. |
| Syringe Size | 1.0 mL | Not applicable |
| Specimen Tube Size | Based on the specimen tube’s diameter:
• 13-mm specimen cassette
• 16-mm specimen cassette
With Adaptor:
• 75 mm specimen tubes
• 2 mL specimen tubes (with 2 mL tube adaptor) | Variable |
{7}
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device
COULTER PrepPlus 2 | Predicate
Manual Pipette |
| | • 3 mL specimen tubes (with 3 mL tube adaptor)
• IMMUNO-TROL control tubes | |
| Specimen Cassette Sizes | 12 specimens per cassette for 13-mm and 16-mm specimen tubes | Not applicable |
| Prepared Sample Tubes (Daughter Tubes) | 12 x 75 mm straight polypropylene test tube, round bottom. | Same |
I. Special Control/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP-5A: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry.
CLSI EP-9A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples.
CLSI H26-A2: Validation, Verification, and Quality Assurance of Automated Hematology Analyzers; Approved Standard -- Second Edition
J. Performance Characteristics:
1. Analytical Performance:
a. Accuracy:
Accuracy was assessed based on Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline, CLSI document EP9-A2. Two Method Comparison studies were performed:
1. TQ-Prep (new device/test method) vs. Q-Prep (comparator/reference method) using manual sample pipetting and preparation
2. PrepPlus 2 and TQ-Prep (new device/test) vs. Manual Pipette and Q-Prep (comparator/reference method).
Each study used the CYTO-STAT® tetraCHROME™ reagents (CD45-FITC/CD4-RD1/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5 and CD45-FITC/CD56-RD1/CD19-ECD/CD3-PC5), Flow-Count Fluorospheres and the FC 500 Flow Cytometer with tetraCXP software.
One hundred thirty (130) specimens were divided into three clinical sites (1 internal and 2 external). Each site analyzed 43 or 44 specimens. Specimens were collected from patients presenting for diagnosis and /or prognosis of HIV or immune dysfunction between the ages of 18-85 years. For this population, the medical decision points for CD3+CD4+ absolute counts were of interest. The same specimens prepared manually and lysed using a Q-Prep workstation were compared to the same specimens prepared manually and automated using a PrepPlus2 unit and lysed using a TQ-Prep workstation. ImmunoPrep reagents were used on both lytic
{8}
workstations.
For $\mathrm{CD3 + / CD4 + }$ $\mathrm{CD3 + / CD8 + }$ $\mathrm{CD3 - / CD56 + }$ $\mathrm{CD19 + }$ (percent and absolute values), and Total $\mathrm{CD3 + }$ upper $95\%$ confidence limits of the bias for the combined dataset $(n = 130)$ were compared to the manufacture's defined accuracy specifications. Data meet specifications if the mean bias for absolute counts is $\pm 40$ cells/ $\mu \mathrm{L}$ for $\leq 300$ cells or $\pm 13\%$ for $>300$ cells and the mean bias for percent is $\pm 1.5\%$ for $\leq 40\%$ or $\pm 2.5\%$ for $>40\%$ . Additionally, regression statistics were calculated by test site. Results for all individual sites showed a high correlation coefficient. The confidence intervals of the slopes and/or intercepts for all individual sites overlapped with the intervals of the same regression statistics of the combined data set. Regression analyses of the combined site results are summarized below:
| tetraCHROME CD45-FITC/CD4-RD1/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5 Reagent | | Total CD3+ | | CD3+CD4+ | | CD3+CD8+ | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Units | | cells/μL | % | cells/μL | % | cells/μL | % |
| N | | 130 | | 130 | | 130 | |
| Correlation | | 0.986 | 0.993 | 0.987 | 0.998 | 0.988 | 0.997 |
| Mean | Manual Pipette vs. Q-Prep | 1058 | 76.26 | 311 | 24.66 | 712 | 49.22 |
| | Manual Pipette vs. TQ-Prep | 1054 | 75.94 | 309 | 24.65 | 712 | 49.00 |
| Slope | | 0.998 | 1.022 | 0.995 | 1.001 | 0.998 | 1.012 |
| 95%CI | Lower limit | 0.976 | 0.997 | 0.972 | 0.985 | 0.978 | 1.00 |
| | Upper limit | 1.019 | 1.048 | 1.019 | 1.016 | 1.017 | 1.024 |
| Intercept | | -5.669 | -2.032 | 0.285 | -0.024 | -3.072 | -0.794 |
| 95%CI | Lower limit | -11.541 | -4.031 | -1.688 | -0.349 | -5.040 | -1.405 |
| | Upper limit | 0.204 | -0.032 | 2.258 | 0.301 | -1.103 | -0.184 |
| tetraCHROME CD45-FITC/CD56-RD1/CD19-ECD/CD3-PC5 Reagent | | Total CD3+ | | CD3-CD56+ | | CD19+ | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Units | | cells/μL | % | cells/μL | % | cells/μL | % |
| N | | 130 | | 130 | | 130 | |
| Correlation | | 0.992 | 0.995 | 0.993 | 0.995 | 0.989 | 0.997 |
| Mean | Manual Pipette vs. Q-Prep | 1102 | 76.24 | 123 | 9.29 | 166 | 11.36 |
| | Manual Pipette vs. TQ-Prep | 1080 | 76.03 | 122 | 9.36 | 164 | 11.35 |
| Slope | | 0.979 | 1.014 | 0.983 | 0.995 | 0.975 | 0.998 |
| 95%CI | Lower limit | 0.964 | 0.996 | 0.959 | 0.970 | 0.955 | 0.982 |
| | Upper limit | 0.993 | 1.032 | 1.006 | 1.020 | 0.996 | 1.013 |
| Intercept | | -3.108 | -1.268 | -0.118 | 0.115 | 0.153 | 0.011 |
| 95%CI | Lower limit | -7.908 | -2.649 | -0.690 | -0.100 | -0.377 | -0.125 |
| | Upper limit | 1.692 | 0.113 | 0.456 | 0.330 | 0.682 | 0.148 |
The PrepPlus 2 automated pipetting method used with the TQ-Prep workstation lytic system demonstrated equivalent performance to the manual pipetting method and Q-Prep lytic system using tetraCHROME reagents and FlowCount to enumerate the absolute count directly. The following two tables summarize combined site regression analysis results:
{9}
| tetraCHROME CD45-FITC/CD4-RD1/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5 Reagent | | Total CD3+ | | CD3+CD4+ | | CD3+CD8+ | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Units | | cells/μL | % | cells/μL | % | cells/μL | % |
| N | | 130 | | 130 | | 130 | |
| Correlation | | 0.981 | 0.994 | 0.990 | 0.997 | 0.983 | 0.998 |
| Mean | Manual Pipette vs. Q-Prep | 1058 | 76.26 | 311 | 24.66 | 712 | 49.22 |
| | PrepPlus1/TQ-Prep | 1129 | 76.08 | 325 | 24.50 | 768 | 49.27 |
| Slope | | 1.072 | 1.029 | 1.041 | 1.000 | 1.067 | 1.014 |
| 95%CI | Lower limit | 1.049 | 1.004 | 1.019 | 0.980 | 1.045 | 1.002 |
| | Upper limit | 1.096 | 1.053 | 1.064 | 1.021 | 1.090 | 1.027 |
| Intercept | | -9.812 | -20361 | 1.929 | -0.169 | -2.204 | -0.659 |
| 95%CI | Lower limit | -16.321 | -4.284 | -0.316 | -0.593 | -5.551 | -1.256 |
| | Upper limit | -3.304 | -0.439 | 4.174 | 0.256 | 1.143 | -0.062 |
| tetraCHROME CD45-FITC/CD56-RD1/CD19-ECD/CD3-PC5 Reagent | | Total CD3+ | | CD3-CD56+ | | CD19+ | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Units | | cells/μL | % | cells/μL | % | cells/μL | % |
| N | | 130 | | 130 | | 130 | |
| Correlation | | 0.984 | 0.995 | 0.988 | 0.994 | 0.987 | 0.997 |
| Mean | Manual Pipette vs. Q-Prep | 1102 | 76.24 | 123 | 9.29 | 166 | 11.36 |
| | PrepPlus1/TQ-Prep | 1114 | 76.14 | 126 | 9.41 | 169 | 11.34 |
| Slope | | 1.011 | 1.021 | 1.016 | 1.003 | 1.001 | 1.013 |
| 95%CI | Lower limit | 0.989 | 1.000 | 0.980 | 0.983 | 0.976 | 0.998 |
| | Upper limit | 1.034 | 1.042 | 1.051 | 1.024 | 1.026 | 1.028 |
| Intercept | | -3.932 | -1.681 | 0.339 | 0.089 | 0.146 | -0.166 |
| 95%CI | Lower limit | -11.260 | -3.327 | -1.065 | -0.083 | -0.401 | -0.305 |
| | Upper limit | 3.396 | -0.035 | 1.743 | 0.260 | 0.694 | -0.028 |
# b. Precision/Reproducibility:
A precision study was conducted according to CLSI EP5-A2, Evaluations of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods. Two levels of control materials (IMMUNO-TROLCells and IMMUNO-TROL Low Cells) and Flow-Count Fluorospheres were evaluated in this study. The IMMUNO-TROL and IMMUNO-TROL Low control cells were prepared 2 times per day, with at least a two-hour interval, stained with CYTO-STAT tetraCHROME reagents CD45-FITC/CD4-RD1/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5 and CD45-FITC/CD56-RD1/CD19-ECD/CD3-PC5, respectively, and acquired twice on a FC 500 flow cytometer, for a total of 23 days for a total of 276 measurements. Three complete systems comprised of a TQ-Prep, PrepPlus 2, and FC 500 flow cytometer with tetraCXP software were tested. Within-run, between-run, between-days, between-instrument and total reproducibility were calculated. Measurements for this study were the absolute counts and percentages of the following lymphocyte subsets: $\mathrm{CD3 + }$ , $\mathrm{CD3 + CD4 + }$ , $\mathrm{CD3 + CD8 + }$ , $\mathrm{CD3 - CD56 + }$ , $\mathrm{CD19 + }$ . The manufacturer's acceptance criteria were as follows:
{10}
| Analyte/Units of Measure | Total CD3+% CD3+ CD4+% CD3+ CD8+% CD3- CD56+% CD19+ CD4+% | | Total CD3+, cells/μL CD3+ CD4+, cells/μL CD3+ CD8+, cells/μL CD3- CD56+, cells/μL CD19+ CD4+, cells/μL | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Mean | ≤20% | >20% | <300 cells/ μL | ≥300 cells/ μL |
| Repeatability Specification (%CV) | ≤10% | ≤5% | ≤10% | ≤5% |
| Reproducibility Specification (%CV) | ≤15% | ≤10% | ≤15% | ≤10% |
Study results indicate that the device system performed according to the manufacturer's acceptance criteria.
A gravimetric study was also performed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the fluid handling elements in the TQ-Prep and PrepPlus 2 sample preparation devices. Three of each instrument were tested by dispensing at least 20 replicates of each of their respective fluids. The results were analyzed for precision of the specified dispensed volumes against their respective specifications. The gravimetric studies demonstrated that the TQ-Prep and PrepPlus 2 performance for pipetting patient samples, controls, and reagents was found to be within the manufacture's specifications that the TQ-Prep and PrepPlus 2 perform with adequate accuracy and precision for delivering patient samples, controls, and reagents.
c. Linearity:
Not applicable
d. Carryover:
Specimen and Reagent Carryover were carried out to test both the carryover of cells and antibody reagents. Carryover was assessed based on recommendations contained in CLSI Document: H26-A2, Validation, Verification, and Quality Assurance of Automated Hematology Analyzers; Approved Standard -- Second Edition. The studies were performed on three systems (each system composed of the TQ-Prep, PrepPlus 2 and FC 500 with textraCXP software) by running three high concentration samples analyzed consecutively three times (HTv1, HTv2, HTv3) followed immediately by testing a low concentration sample three times (LTv1, LTv2, LTv3). This run was repeated three times on each of the three systems, for both the specimen and reagent carryover studies. The percent carryover for specimen and reagent is calculated for absolute cell counts by formula referenced in H26-A2 (%Carryover = ((LTv1-LTv3)/(HTv3-LTv3))x100). These studies indicated that the complete systems, composed of the TQ-Prep, PrepPlus 2, and FC 500 with tetraCXP software,
{11}
performed within the manufactures specification that scatter and fluorescence carryover shall be <1% from one specimen to another in absolute number of counted cells.
e. Interfering Substances:
Not applicable
2. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Data Not Covered Above:
Not applicable
K. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
L. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.