K130224 · Imris, Inc. · JAK · Jul 18, 2013 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K130224
Device Name
ICT
Applicant
Imris, Inc.
Product Code
JAK · Radiology
Decision Date
Jul 18, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1750
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The iCT device with sliding gantry is intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from either the same axial plane taken at different angles or spiral planes* taken at different angles. (*spiral plane: the axial planes resulted from the continuous rotation of detectors and x-ray tube, and the simultaneous translation of the sliding gantry).
Device Story
iCT is a whole-body X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanner; utilizes a standard CT gantry with a ceiling-mounted suspension and drive mechanism. System allows horizontal gantry translation along ceiling rails during image acquisition while patient remains stationary on a table. Inputs: X-ray transmission data acquired via rotating tube-detector system. Transformation: Fan beam principle; computer reconstruction of data into cross-sectional images. Output: DICOM format CT images. Used in clinical settings; operated by trained personnel. Ceiling-mounted design enables sharing between multiple rooms or storage. Healthcare providers use images for diagnostic purposes. Benefits: Allows patient to remain stationary during scanning, facilitating integration with surgical tables and clinical workflows.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Verification and validation relied on laboratory studies using high-precision phantoms to confirm image quality, z-axis accuracy, and gantry stability. Conformance to IEC 60601 standards and NEMA XR-25 (Dose Check) was verified.
Technological Characteristics
Whole-body CT scanner; ceiling-mounted sliding gantry system. Components: SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ gantry, power supply, operator console. Imaging: Fan beam principle, continuous rotation. Connectivity: DICOM output. Standards: 21 CFR 1020.30/1020.33, IEC 60601 family, NEMA XR-25. Software: syngo platform.
Indications for Use
Indicated for producing cross-sectional body images via computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data in axial or spiral planes. No specific patient population, age, or gender restrictions stated.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A computed tomography x-ray system is a diagnostic x-ray system intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axial plane taken at different angles. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
SOMATON Computed Tomography X-Ray Systems Sliding Gantry Option (K032475)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows handwritten text that appears to be a combination of alphanumeric characters and words. The text includes "K130224", "page 1 of 3", and "iCT". The handwriting is cursive and somewhat stylized, with some characters connected and others distinct. The overall impression is that of a page number or identification code within a larger document.
510{k) Premarket Notification
## IMRIS O
### 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) summary is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 C.F.R. Part §807.92.
| Submitter: | IMRIS Inc.<br>1370 Sony Place<br>Winnipeg, MB R3T 1N5<br>Canada<br>Establishment Registration Number: 3003807210 | | | JUL 1 8 2013 |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--------------|
| Contact Person: | Daniel Biank, JD, MEng, PE, RAC<br>Director, Regulatory Affairs | | | |
| Telephone: | 763.203.6310 | | | |
| Fax: | 204.480.7071 | | | |
| Email: | dbiank@imris.com | | | |
| Alternate Contact Person: | Sanjay Shah, P.Eng<br>Manager, Regulatory Affairs | | | |
| Telephone: | 204.480.7054 | | | |
| Fax: | 204.480.7071 | | | |
| Email: | sshah@imris.com | | | |
| Date Prepared: | May 15, 2013 | | | |
| Device Name | | | | |
| Trade Name: | iCT | | | |
| Common Name: | System, X-ray, Tomography, Computed (JAK) | | | |
| Classification Name: | Computed Tomography X-ray System (21 CFR §892.1750) | | | |
#### Predicate Devices:
| 510(k) | Decision Date | Device Name | Manufacturer |
|---------|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| K081022 | Jun 2, 2008 | SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. |
| K032475 | Nov 10, 2003 | SOMATON Computed Tomography X-<br>Ray Systems Sliding Gantry Option | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. |
#### Device Description:
iCT is a whole body x-ray computed tomography (CT) scanner. It combines a standard CT gantry with a ceiling mounted suspension and drive mechanism to move the gantry horizontally during image acquisition. The standard CT gantry features a continuously rotating tub-detector system and functions according to the fan beam principle. The ceiling mounted suspension and drive mechanism allows iCT to be moved along rails for storage or to share the iCT between multiple rooms. The ceiling mounted system also provides precise horizontal movement that is integrated with the CT scan control. During image acquisition, the iCT drive mechanism translates the CT gantry while the patient table remains stationary. Moving the gantry allows the patient to remain stationary instead of translating the patient relative to the gantry as is required with fixed gantry systems. iCT may be used with commercially available patient tables, including surgical tables, that meet the appropriate size and x-ray transmission characteristic requirements.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image shows a handwritten note with the text "K130224 Page 2 of 3 iCT". The text is written in black ink on a white background. The handwriting is somewhat stylized, with the "K" and "P" being particularly prominent.
## IMBIS O
510(k) Premarket Notification
iCT leverages the previously cleared SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ (K081022) gantry, power supply and operator console components, including the syngo software platform and compatible syngo applications. iCT produces CT images in DICOM format. The syngo platform is able to run optional postprocessing applications.
#### Intended Use:
The iCT device with sliding gantry is intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from either the same axial plane taken at different angles or spiral planes* taken at different angles.
(*spiral plane: the axial planes resulted from the continuous rotation of detectors and x-ray tube, and the simultaneous translation of the sliding gantry).
#### Comparison with Predicate Devices:
iCT is substantially equivalent to the currently cleared and marketed SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ (K081022) when used with the optional sliding gantry package cleared earlier under SOMATON Computed Tomography X-Ray Systems Sliding Gantry Option (K032475) by Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. The predicate SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ is a standard CT system. As a SOMATOM family CT scanner it can be used with the SOMATON Computed Tomography X-Ray Systems Sliding Gantry Option.
The SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ with Sliding Gantry Option provides a fully functional CT scanner that moves the CT gantry along rails mounted in the floor. This allows the patient to remain stationary on a fixed table as the gantry moves horizontally during image acquisition.
iCT provides a fully functional CT scanner that moves the CT gantry suspended from rails mounted in the ceiling. It also uses the horizontal motion of the gantry while the patient remains stationary on a table during image acquisition.
iCT uses the SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ gantry, power supply and operator workspace components. Therefore, the x-ray characteristics and scan interfaces are the same. It acquires images using the same method for incorporating gantry translation into scan control movement as the cleared Sliding Gantry Option. The primary difference between the predicates and iCT is that iCT travels on ceiling rails instead of floor rails. These differences have been identified and assessed in risk management and are addressed by recognized standards and the included testing.
#### Summary of Studies:
iCT performance has been evaluated in verification and validation to ensure the ceiling railing system maintains the performance of the contained SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ system components. Risk Management has been applied to identify, mitigate and test the distinctions between iCT and the SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ with the sliding gantry package. Image quality testing based on high precision phantoms was provided in this submission to demonstrate substantial equivalence with the predicate. iCT has been tested to perform to the same image quality, z-axis accuracy and gantry stability specifications as the SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ with the sliding gantry package. iCT has also been tested to conform to applicable product safety standards. iCT meets the applicable
{2}------------------------------------------------
# IMBIS O
510(k) Premarket Notification
requirements of the Federal performance standards for ionizing radiation emitting products defined in 21 CFR §§1020.30 and 1020.33 for CT systems. It conforms to the applicable International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601 family of standards, including applicable collateral and particulars, for medical devices and CT systems. iCT complies with NEMA XR-25, Computed Tomography Dose Check.
The iCT system uses a previously cleared CT system with cleared moving gantry option as a base, and the major modification to the predicate is the integrate hardware that allow for the system to be mounted on the ceiling instead of the floor. Because the major software components in the imaging chain are unmodified from the predicate, sample clinical images are unnecessary to support substantial equivalence in this case and instead testing relied on laboratory studies.
iCT verification and validation results support a determination of substantial equivalence.
#### Additional Information:
Substantial equivalence was evaluated based on software documentation for a Moderate Level of Concern device.
#### Conclusion:
iCT is substantially equivalent to the currently cleared and marketed SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+ (K081022) when used with the optional sliding gantry package, SOMATON Computed Tomography X-Ray Systems Sliding Gantry Option (K032475). iCT has been successfully tested to operate within the same performance and image quality specifications as the currently cleared and marketed SOMATOM Definition, Model AS/AS+. iCT has been evaluated to conform to applicable product safety standards that have been recognized to address known CT risks. iCT is substantially equivalent to the predicate based on the included studies and analysis.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles a human figure embracing three smaller figures. The symbol is rendered in black, and the text is also in black.
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-Godge Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
July 18, 2013
IMRIS, Inc. % Mr. Daniel Biank Director. Regulatory Affairs 100-1370 Sony Place Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 1N5 CANADA
Re: K130224
Trade/Device Name: iCT Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750 Regulation Name: Computed tomography x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: JAK Dated: May 16, 2013 Received: May 20, 2013
Dear Mr. Biank:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Ilisting of devices. good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class 11 (Special Controls) or class 11) (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820): and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Biank
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resources/orYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safetv/RcportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
Smh.7)
for
Janine M. Morris Director, Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K130224
Device Name: iCT
Indications for Use:
The iCT device with sliding gantry is intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from either the same axial plane taken at different angles or spiral planes* taken at different angles.
(*spiral plane: the axial planes resulted from the continuous rotation of detectors and x-ray tube, and the simultaneous translation of the sliding gantry).
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (OIR)
Smh.7)
(Division Sign Off) Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health
510(k) K130224 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 1 of I
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.