The Sofia Strep A FIA employs immunofluorescence technology to detect Group A Streptococcal antigens from throat swabs of symptomatic patients. All negative test results should be confirmed by bacterial culture because negative results do not preclude Group A Strep infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment. The test is intended for professional and laboratory use as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal infection.
Device Story
Sofia Strep A FIA is a qualitative immunofluorescence lateral flow assay for detecting Group A Streptococcus pyogenes antigens in throat swabs. The device uses a sandwich assay design with europium chelate-impregnated polystyrene microbeads coated with anti-Strep A polyclonal antibodies. Input consists of an extracted clinical sample applied to a test cassette. The Sofia Analyzer performs automated scanning, data collection, and analysis of fluorescence signals at the analyte and procedural control zones. The analyzer eliminates visual interpretation subjectivity, providing objective results (Positive, Negative, or Invalid) on a screen or via printer/LIS. Used in professional/laboratory settings, the device supports 'Walk Away' (automated timing) or 'Read Now' (manual timing) modes. The system includes fail-safe features, such as procedural control zone monitoring, to ensure adequate specimen flow and prevent reporting of incorrect results. By providing rapid, objective detection, the device aids clinicians in timely diagnosis and management of pharyngitis.
Clinical Evidence
Multi-center clinical study evaluated sensitivity and specificity using throat swab specimens. Reproducibility study assessed intra-/inter-operator and intra-/inter-laboratory performance across various Strep A concentrations. Analytical studies included Limit of Detection, inclusivity, cross-reactivity, interfering substances, operating temperature, transport stability, inter-analyzer precision, and calibration cycle.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral-flow immunoassay using polyclonal rabbit antibodies specific to Group A Strep antigens. Detection utilizes polystyrene microparticles dyed with Europium chelate. Instrument-based fluorescence measurement. Includes calibration cassette and QC card. Operates at room temperature. Software-based automated analysis.
Indications for Use
Indicated for symptomatic patients requiring diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal infection via throat swab specimens. Intended for professional and laboratory use. Negative results require confirmation by bacterial culture.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Streptococcus spp. serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera (excluding streptococcal exoenzyme reagents made from enzymes secreted by streptococci) used in serological tests to identify Streptococcus spp. from cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Streptococcus and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Pathogenic streptococci are associated with infections, such as sore throat, impetigo (an infection characterized by small pustules on the skin), urinary tract infections, rheumatic fever, and kidney disease.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K123793
B. Purpose for Submission:
Premarket notification seeking 510(k) clearance of the Sophia® Strep A FIA assay for use with the Sophia™ Analyzer.
C. Measurand:
Group A Streptococcal antigens in throat swab specimen.
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative immunofluorescence based lateral flow assay
E. Applicant:
Quidel Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Sofia® Strep A FIA and Sofia™ Analyzer
Strep A immunological test system and Fluorometer
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.3740, 21 CFR 866.2560
2. Classification:
Class 1
3. Product code:
GTY, KHO
{1}
4. Panel:
Microbiology (83)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The Sofia Strep A FIA employs immunofluorescence technology to detect Group A Streptococcal antigens from throat swabs of symptomatic patients. All negative test results should be confirmed by bacterial culture because negative results do not preclude Group A Strep infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment. The test is intended for professional and laboratory use as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal infection.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Sofia Strep A FIA employs immunofluorescence technology to detect Group A Streptococcal antigens from throat swabs of symptomatic patients. All negative test results should be confirmed by bacterial culture because negative results do not preclude Group A Strep infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment. The test is intended for professional and laboratory use as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal infection.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
To be used only with the Sophia™ Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The Sofia Strep A FIA is an immunofluorescence-based, lateral flow assay that uses a sandwich design to detect Group A Streptococcus pyogenes in patient specimens. As shown in the schematic below, the design of the test strip is typical for lateral flow assays. For example, the test strip contains the following elements commonly seen in non-fluorescence-based lateral flow devices:
- A sample pad that receives the specimen;
- A label pad that contains detection particles or micro-beads coated with polyclonal antibodies that are specific for the antigens of Group A Streptococcus pyogenes;
- A nitrocellulose test strip to which are bound capture polyclonal antibodies for Group A Strep antigens at a specific location or stripe on the nitrocellulose strip;
2
{2}
- A procedural control located after the analyte-specific test line on the nitrocellulose;
- An absorbent pad to facilitate wicking of the fluid across the nitrocellulose into the absorbent pad; and
- A desiccant that does not participate in the assay, but serves as a stabilizing agent during storage.
Elements in the Sofia Strep A FIA that are different from other lateral flow assay devices include the following:
- The fluorescent assay replaces antibody-tagged colored microparticles with antibody-tagged microparticles dyed with a highly fluorescent europium compound;
- The procedural control zone, designated at the location of the striped Reference Line, is a region located between the analyte line and the absorbent pad. The Sofia Analyzer scans this zone at the end of the assay to determine whether adequate flow of the specimen has occurred. A minimum fluorescent signal specification for this procedural control zone is an important fail-safe feature incorporated into the assay.
- No colored test or procedural control lines will be visible in the test window of the fluorescent assay cassette. The Sofia Analyzer automatically scans the test strip, collects and analyzes the fluorescence data, and then calculates and reports the result. These features eliminate the subjectivity required to interpret results in visual lateral flow assays. The operator must use the Sofia Analyzer to obtain a test result.
- The Sofia Analyzer has a number of fail-safe and failure alert procedures to help prevent the reporting of incorrect test results.
The sensitivity of the assay is derived from the use of a unique polystyrene microbead that has been dyed with a chelate of europium. The europium compound (more than $1 \times 10^{6}$ fluorescent molecules per bead) that is encased within the microbeads is temperature stable, resistant to bleaching in room light, and yields a very efficient conversion of the ultraviolet (UV) energy from $365 \mathrm{~nm}$ to a wavelength of $618 \mathrm{~nm}$. This large Stokes shift protects against many naturally occurring fluorescent compounds that may be present in the test materials and/or clinical specimens.

Schematic of the Sofia Strep A FIA Test Strip
{3}
Analyte detection with the lateral flow device begins with the pipetting of an extracted clinical sample into the test cassette's sample port and onto the sample pad, after which the sample is drawn by capillary action into and through the label pad, through the nitrocellulose strip and into the absorbent pad. The specimen interacts with distinct chemical environments as the fluid migrates along the course of the lateral flow device. Within the label pad, the specimen comes into contact with antibodies that have been coupled to the europium chelate-impregnated microbeads. During this interaction, the beads coated with anti-Strep A polyclonal antibodies bind corresponding Strep A antigens that are present in the specimen. The bead-coupled antigen-antibody complexes then begin to flow through the test strip. As they migrate on, if Strep A antigens are present in the sample, they and the fluorescent beads to which they are bound will be subsequently captured on the surface of the nitrocellulose by the respective location-fixed, anti-Strep A-specific capture antibodies. The flow and capture of the fluorescent microbeads coated with Strep A antigens allows the accumulation of a fluorescent signal at the specific analyte line location on the test strip. Upon completion of the test, the Sofia Analyzer scans the test strip and objectively interprets the assay result. There are three possible results: (1) positive for Strep A; (2) negative for Strep A; and (3) invalid. It is important to point out that the fluorescence signals obtained with this assay are invisible to the unaided eye. The test results can only be obtained with the proper use of the Sofia Analyzer. This ensures fully objective interpretation of the test result.
Results are presented on a screen and can be printed on an integrated printer (optional).
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
QuickVue® Dipstick Strep A Test, Sofia Analyzer
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K011097, K112177
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate | |
| Features | Sofia Analyzer and Strep A FIA (K123793) | QuickVue Dipstick Strep A Test (K011097) | Sofia Analyzer and Influenza A+B FIA (K112177) |
| Qualitative | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | Room Temperature | Room Temperature | Room Temperature |
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate | |
| Features | Sofia Analyzer and Strep A FIA | QuickVue Dipstick Strep A Test | Sofia Analyzer and Influenza A+B FIA |
{4}
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate | |
| Indented Use | The Sofia Strep A FIA employs immunofluorescence technology to detect Group A Streptococcal antigens from throat swabs of symptomatic patients. All negative test results should be confirmed by bacterial culture because negative results do not preclude Group A Strep infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment. The test is intended for professional and laboratory use as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal infection. | The QuickVue Dipstick Strep A is a sensitive immunoassay for the qualitative detection of Group A Streptococcal antigen from throat swab specimens or confirmation of presumptive Group A Streptococcal colonies from culture. This test is to be used to aid in the diagnosis of disease caused by Group A Streptococcus. | The Sofia Influenza A+B FIA employs immunofluorescence to detect influenza A and influenza B viral nucleoprotein antigens in nasal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, and nasopharyngeal aspirate/wash specimens taken directly from symptomatic patients. This qualitative test is intended for use as an aid in the rapid differential diagnosis of acute influenza A and influenza B viral infections. The test is not intended to detect influenza C antigens. A negative test is presumptive and it is recommended these results be confirmed by virus culture or an FDA-cleared influenza A and B molecular assay. Negative results do not preclude influenza virus infections and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other management decisions. The test is intended for professional and laboratory use.
Performance characteristics for influenza A and B were established during February through March 2011 when influenza viruses A/California/7/2009 (2009 H1N1), A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2), and B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Victoria-Like) were the predominant influenza viruses in circulation according to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report from the CDC entitled “Update: Influenza Activity--United States, 2010-2011 Season, and Composition of the 2011-2012 Influenza Vaccine”. Performance characteristics may vary against other emerging influenza viruses.
If infection with a novel influenza virus is suspected |
{5}
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate | |
| | | | based on current clinical and epidemiological screening criteria recommended by public health authorities, specimens should be collected with appropriate infection control precautions for novel virulent influenza viruses and sent to state or local health department for testing. Virus culture should not be attempted in these cases unless a BSL 3+ facility is available to receive and culture specimens. |
| Instrument | Sofia Analyzer | None | Sofia Analyzer |
| Analyte | Group A Streptococcal | Group A Streptococcal | Influenza A and Influenza B |
| Automated Analysis | Yes | No | Yes |
| Read Results | Read results on instrument screen or print with optional printer | Visual read for presence or absence of control and test lines | Read results on instrument screen or print with optional printer |
| Calibrator | Yes – Calibration Cassette and QC Card provided | Not Applicable | Yes – Calibration Cassette and QC Card provided |
| Read Result Time | 5 Minutes | 5 Minutes | 15 Minutes |
| Specimen Types | Throat swab | Throat swab or culture colonies | Nasal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, and nasopharyngeal aspirate/wash |
| Test Principle | Immunofluorescence Device | Immunoassay | Immunofluorescence Device |
| Format | Lateral-flow Test Cassette | Lateral-flow dipstick | Lateral-flow Test Cassette |
| Antibodies Used | Polyclonal rabbit antibodies that are specific to Group A Streptococcus | Polyclonal rabbit antibodies that are specific to Group A Streptococcus | Monoclonal antibodies to influenza A nucleoprotein and monoclonal antibodies to influenza B nucleoprotein |
| Detection Particle | Polystyrene microparticles dyed with Europium chelate | Polystyrene microparticles dyed with red colorant | Polystyrene microparticles dyed with Europium chelate |
| Reagent | One reagent bottle containing sodium nitrite and acetic acid in glass ampoule | Two reagent bottles: one containing sodium nitrite and one containing acetic acid | Lyophilized buffer containing detergents |
| Transfer Device | Fixed volume pipette used to transfer patient sample mixed with reagent into Test Cassette | Directly add dipstick to test tube containing patient sample mixed with reagent | Fixed volume pipette used to transfer patient sample mixed with reagent into Test Cassette |
| External Controls | Test kit contains Positive and Negative Control Swabs | Test kit contains Positive and Negative Liquid Controls | Test kit contains Positive and Negative Control Swabs |
{6}
| Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate | |
| Quality Control Features | Built-in features include:
• Built-in procedural control zone scanned by the analyzer to determine whether adequate flow occurred
• Analyzer prevents used or expired cartridge from being read by the reader
• Cassette properly inserted | Built-in procedural control line interpreted by the operator to determine whether adequate flow occurred and clearing of background | Built-in features include:
• Built-in procedural control zone scanned by the analyzer to determine whether adequate flow occurred
• Analyzer prevents used or expired cartridge from being read by the reader
• Cassette properly inserted
• Built-in negative control line scanned by the analyzer to measure degree of non-specific binding |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Standards recognized by FDA:
- CLSI LIS01-A2 (13-29)
- CLSI LIS2-A2 (13-17)
- EP5-A2 (7-110)
- EP12-A2 (7-152)
- IEC 62304:2006 (13-32)
- ISO 14971:2007 (5-40)
- ISO 15223-1:2007 (5-73)
Other Standards:
- EN 61326-1
- EN61326-2-6
- EP17-A
- IEC 61010-1
- IEC 61010-2-081
- IEC 61010-2-101
L. Test Principle:
The Sofia Strep A FIA employs immunofluorescence technology that is used with the Sofia Analyzer to detect Group A Streptococcal antigen. The Sofia Strep A FIA involves the extraction of the antigenic components of the Group A Streptococcus (GAS) bacteria. The
{7}
patient's swab specimen is placed in the Reagent Tube containing the Reagent Solution, during which time the bacterial antigens are extracted, making them more accessible to the specific antibodies. An aliquot of the extracted specimen is dispensed into the Cassette sample well. From the sample well, the specimen migrates through a test strip containing various unique chemical environments. If Group A Streptococcal antigens are present, they will be bound by antibodies coupled to fluorescent microparticles that migrate through the test strip. The fluorescent microparticles containing bound antigen will be captured by antibodies at a defined location on the test strip where they are detected by the Sofia Analyzer. If antigens are not present, the fluorescent microparticles will not be trapped by the capture antibodies nor detected by the Analyzer.
Depending upon the user's choice, the Cassette, now containing the specimen, is either placed directly inside the Sofia Analyzer for automatically timed development (Walk Away Mode) or placed on the counter or bench top for a manually timed development and then placed into the Sofia Analyzer (Read Now Mode).
The Sofia Analyzer scans, measures, and interprets the immune-fluorescent signal, using onboard method-specific algorithms. The Sofia Analyzer will then report the test results to the user (Positive, Negative, or Invalid) on its display screen and it can print out the results via an on-board printer or transmit the results via an LIS connection.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The reproducibility of the Sofia Strep A FIA was evaluated at three (3) different laboratories. Two (2) different operators at each site tested a series of coded, contrived samples, prepared in negative throat swab clinical matrix, ranging from low negative to moderate positive Group A Streptococcus. Reproducibility studies were done in the Read Now mode.
Spiked Throat Swab Panel Members
| Low Negative | The low negative specimen consisted of the negative matrix containing no spiked bacteria. |
| --- | --- |
| High Negative | Analyte concentration below the LoD, such that results of repeated tests are negative approximately 95% of the time. |
| Low Positive | Analyte concentration at the LoD such that results of repeated tests are positive approximately 95% of the time |
| Moderate Positive | Analyte concentration three times the LoD such that the results of repeated tests should be positive 100% of the time for Strep A. |
The inter-laboratory agreement for negative samples was 96.7-100% and 96.7-100% for positive samples. The intra-laboratory agreement for all samples ranged from 97.5-99.2%:
{8}
Sofia Strep A FIA Reproducibility Study Inter-laboratory Agreement
| Site | Low Neg (no bacteria) (0 cfu/test) | High Negative (C_{5}) (1.5x10^{3} cfu/test) | Low Positive (C_{95}) (3.0x10^{3} cfu/test) | Mod. Positive (C_{3X}) (2.8x10^{4} cfu/test) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 30/30 | 30/30 | 28/30 | 30/30 |
| 2 | 30/30 | 29/30 | 30/30 | 30/30 |
| 3 | 30/30 | 28/30 | 29/30 | 30/30 |
| Total | 90/90 | 87/90 | 87/90 | 90/90 |
| % Overall Agreement (95% CI) | 100% (90/90) (95.9 - 100%) | 96.7% (87/90) (90.7 - 98.9%) | 96.7% (87/90) (90.7 - 98.9%) | 100% (90/90) (95.9 - 100%) |
Sofia Strep A FIA Reproducibility Study Intra-laboratory Agreement
| Site | Low Neg (no bacteria) (0 cfu/test) | High Negative (C_{5}) (1.5x10^{3} cfu/test) | Low Positive (C_{95}) (3.0x10^{3} cfu/test) | Mod. Positive (C_{3X}) (2.8x10^{4} cfu/test) | % Overall Agreement (95% CI) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 30/30 | 30/30 | 28/30 | 30/30 | 98.3% (118/120) (94.1-99.5%) |
| 2 | 30/30 | 29/30 | 30/30 | 30/30 | 99.2% (119/120) (95.4-99.9%) |
| 3 | 30/30 | 28/30 | 29/30 | 30/30 | 97.5% (117/120) (92.9-99.1%) |
The study further established the reliability of performance of the Positive and Negative Controls, for which 100% correct results were obtained (60/60) as shown below:
Positive and Negative Control Results
| Site | Operator | Positive Control Passed | Negative Control Passed |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 2 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | Total | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| | | | |
| 2 | 1 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 2 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
{9}
| | Total | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3 | 1 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | 2 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| | Total | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Total ALL: | | 30/30 | 30/30 |
The reproducibility panel contained low negative, high negative, low positive and moderate positive samples for Strep A. The operators obtained accurate results 98.3% (354/360) of the time.
These results demonstrate that clinical laboratory personnel from different sites and with varying levels of experience can accurately follow the Package Insert and Quick Reference Instructions, and perform the FIA correctly. No significant differences in results were observed within-run (replicates), between-runs (10 runs on at least five different assay days), or between-sites.
Reproducibility studies are acceptable.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not Applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
## Culture Sample Stability
A stability study was conducted to determine the impact of different storage and/or shipping conditions on the culture viability of swabs spiked with Group A Streptococcus bacteria; as well as to evaluate the impact of the same conditions on the recovery or sustenance of antigenicity. For this study, Streptococcus pyogenes strain at a concentration approximating three times its pre-determined LoD or 5.58 x 104 CFU/test were selected. Swabs seeded with this amount of Streptococcus pyogenes were stored at different temperatures, from zero hours to up to more than 50 hours in some cases. At the end of each storage condition, all swabs were cultured on agar plates and subsequently interpreted for bacterial growth by examining the quadrants of each culture plate for growth. In addition, after streaking the blood agar plates, the same swabs were tested in the Sofia Strep A FIA per the draft package insert. Stability studies were done in the Read Now mode.
This study demonstrated that storage of swabs spiked with even low concentrations of bacteria (approximately 3 x LoD) can be stored, and by inference transported, at 2 to 8°C without a negative impact on recoverability in culture—even for storage periods extending up to 56 hours. The culture results, though not easily quantified, suggest that storage and transport at these temperatures is preferred over that at laboratory ambient temperature, although the differences are subtle. All samples stored at all of
{10}
the temperatures examined gave 100% accurate results in the Sofia Strep A FIA, supporting observations in other studies and attesting to the fact that the antigens measured in this assay are sufficiently stable to ensure detection. Freezing at -20°C or at -70°C, followed by culture and Sofia testing gave good results for both culture and rapid antigen detection.
## Kit Stability Dating
A combination of real-time and accelerated data was used to establish the current kit dating of shelf life dating in excess of 24 months when the product is stored at 25°C.
## Calibration Cassette Stability Dating
A combination of real-time and accelerated data was used to establish the current kit dating of shelf life dating in excess of 33 months when the product is stored at 25°C in a sealed protective foil pouch.
## d. Detection limit:
The limit of detection (LoD) for the Sofia Strep A FIA was determined using three strains of Group A Streptococcus pyogenes. The LoD ranged from 9×10³ – 2×10⁴ colony forming units (cfu)/test (see below).
Sofia Strep A FIA Limits of Detection for Three Streptococcus pyogenes Strains
| Strain | Minimum Detectable Level* |
| --- | --- |
| Bruno [CIP 104226] | 1.86×10⁴ cfu/test |
| CDC-SS-1402 | 9.24×10³ cfu/test |
| CDC-SS-1460 | 2.34×10⁴ cfu/test |
cfu/test = colony forming units/test
*The levels of bacteria were determined by limiting dilution, bacterial culture, and colony counting to give cfu/test.
Limit of Detection studies are acceptable.
## e. Analytical specificity:
Analytical Reactivity: Analytical reactivity for the Sofia Strep A FIA was determined using 15 strains of Streptococcus pyogenes. Each strain listed below produced positive results in the assay.
Analytical Reactivity
| Streptococcus pyogenes Strain | Test Quantity* |
| --- | --- |
| Strain #1 (ATCC 19615) | 6.5×10⁴ cfu/test |
| Strain #2 (ATCC 700942) | 7.4×10⁴ cfu/test |
{11}
12
| Streptococcus pyogenes Strain | Test Quantity* |
| --- | --- |
| Strain #3 (ATCC 700952) | 8.3x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #4 (Field Clinical Isolate) | 3.1x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #5 (Field Clinical Isolate) | 7.6x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #6 (Field Clinical Isolate) | 7.1x10^{5} cfu/test |
| Strain #7 (Field Clinical Isolate) | 6.3x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #8 (Field Clinical Isolate) | 6.3x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #9 (Field Clinical Isolate) | 5.3x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #10 (ATCC 700482) | 6.5x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #11 (ATCC BAA 1315) | 7.2x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #12 (ATCC 700459) | 5.4x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #13 (ATCC 12203) | 6.9x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #14 ATCC 700944) | 5.3x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Strain #15 (Field Clinical Isolate) | 7.0x10^{4} cfu/test |
cfu/test = colony forming units/test
*The levels of bacteria were determined by limiting dilution, bacterial culture, and colony counting to give cfu/test.
Analytical Reactivity studies are acceptable.
## Cross Reactivity
The cross reactivity of the Sofia Strep A FIA was evaluated with a total of 61 non-Group A Streptococcus bacterial and fungal microorganisms, and 26 viral isolates. None of the organisms or viruses listed below showed any sign of cross reactivity in the assay. When the same organisms were pre-mixed with Group A Strep and tested in the Sofia Strep A FIA, all results are positive also indicating that the potential cross-reactants did not interfere with the detection of Strep A.
Analytical Specificity and Cross Reactivity
| Organism/Virus | Test Quantity* |
| --- | --- |
| Arcanobacterium haemolyticum | 3x10^{5} cfu/test |
| Bacteroides fragilis | 3x10^{7} cfu/test |
| Bordetella pertussis | 3x10^{7} cfu/test |
| Candida albicans | 3x10^{4} cfu/test |
| Corynebacterium diphtheria | 3x10^{5} cfu/test |
| Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum | 3x10^{6} cfu/test |
| Enterococcus faecalis | 3x10^{6} cfu/test |
| Enterococcus faecium | 3x10^{6} cfu/test |
| Escherichia coli | 1.5x10^{7} cfu/test |
| Fusobacterium necrophorum | 3x10^{6} cfu/test |
{12}
| Organism/Virus | Test Quantity* |
| --- | --- |
| Haemophilus influenzae | 3x107cfu/test |
| Haemophilus parahaemolyticus | 3x106cfu/test |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 3x107cfu/test |
| Moraxella catarrhalis | 3x106cfu/test |
| Neisseria lactamica | 3x106cfu/test |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeae | 3x106cfu/test |
| Neisseria meningitidis | 3x106cfu/test |
| Neisseria sicca | 3x107cfu/test |
| Neisseria subflava | 3x107cfu/test |
| Proteus vulgaris | 3x107cfu/test |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 3x106cfu/test |
| Serratia marcescens | 3x107cfu/test |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 3x106cfu/test |
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | 3x106cfu/test |
| Staphylococcus haemolyticus | 3x105cfu/test |
| Staphylococcus intermedius | 3x105cfu/test |
| Staphylococcus saprophyticus | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus anginosus | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus gordonii | 3x104cfu/test |
| Streptococcus mitis | 3x104cfu/test |
| Streptococcus mutans | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus oralis | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus parasanguis | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus salivarius | 3x105cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sanguinis | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group B strain #1 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group B strain #2 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group B strain #3 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group B strain #4 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group B strain #5 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group C strain #1 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group C strain #2 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group C strain #3 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group C strain #4 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group D strain #5 | 3x103cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group D strain #1 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group D strain #2 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group D strain #3 | 3x106cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group D strain #4 | 3x106cfu/test |
{13}
| Organism/Virus | Test Quantity* |
| --- | --- |
| Streptococcus sp. Group D strain #5 | 3x10^6 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group F strain #1 | 3x10^3 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group F strain #2 | 3x10^6 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group F strain #3 | 3x10^6 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group F strain #4 | 3x10^3 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group F strain #5 | 3x10^3 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group G strain #1 | 3x10^7 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group G strain #2 | 3x10^6 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group G strain #3 | 3x10^6 cfu/test |
| Streptococcus sp. Group G strain #4 | 3x10^6 cfu/test |
| Yersinia enterocolitica | 3x10^6 cfu/test |
| Adenovirus Type 1 | 3x10^11 TCID50/test |
| Adenovirus Type 3 | 3x10^5 TCID50/test |
| Adenovirus Type 4 | 1.5x10^2 TCID50/test |
| Adenovirus Type 5 | 3x10^5 TCID50/test |
| Adenovirus Type 11 | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Coronavirus 229E | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Coronavirus OC43 | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Coxsackievirus B5 (Faulkner) | 3x10^6 TCID50/test |
| Cytomegalovirus | 3x10^3 TCID50/test |
| Echovirus Type 3 | 1.5x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Epstein Barr virus | 3x10^7 TCID50/test |
| Herpes Simplex virus 1 | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Herpes Simplex virus 2 | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Influenza A H1N1 | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Influenza A H3N2 | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Influenza B Hong Kong | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Influenza B Panama | 1.5x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Influenza C Taylor | 1.5x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Measles (Edmonston) | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Mumps (Enders) | 3x10^3 TCID50/test |
| Parainfluenza virus 1 | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Parainfluenza virus 2 | 1.2 TCID50/test |
| Parainfluenza virus 3 | 3x10^6 TCID50/test |
| Parainfluenza virus 4A | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Rhinovirus Type 15 | 3x10^4 TCID50/test |
| Rhinovirus Type 1B | 3x10^3 TCID50/test |
cfu/test = colony forming units/test $\mathrm{TCID}_{50}$ /test = 50% tissue culture infectious dose
*The levels of bacteria were determined by limiting dilution, bacterial culture, and colony counting to give cfu/test. Virus concentrations were determined by standard
{14}
virology methods, Reed-Muench.
Cross-reactivity studies are acceptable.
## Interfering Substances
Several over-the-counter (OTC) products, whole blood, and blood agar were evaluated and did not interfere with the Sofia Strep A FIA at the levels tested below.
Non-interfering Substances
| Substance | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Crest Pro-Health Night Mint (Cetylpyridinium chloride) | 25% v/v |
| Listerine Antiseptic (Eucalyptol, Menthol, Methyl salicylate, and Thymol) | 25% v/v |
| Listerine Cool Mint (Eucalyptol, Menthol, Methyl salicylate, and Thymol) | 25% v/v |
| Cepacol Dual Relief Spray (Benzocaine and Menthol) | 25% v/v |
| Chloraseptic Max: Sore Throat Relief (Phenol and Glycerin) | 25% v/v |
| Children’s Dimetapp DM Cold & Cough Elixir (Brompheniramine maleate, Dextromethorphan HBr, and Phenylephrine HCl) | 25% v/v |
| Children’s Wal-Tap Elixir Cold & Allergy (Brompheniramine maleate and Phenylephrine HCl) | 25% v/v |
| Children’s Wal-Tap DM Elixir Cold & Cough (Brompheniramine maleate, Dextromethorphan HBr, and Phenylephrine HCl) | 25% v/v |
| Rite Aid Tussin CF (Dextromethorphan HBr, Guaifenesin, and Phenylephrine HCl) | 25% v/v |
| Robitussin Cough & Cold-CF Max (Dextromethorphan HBr, Guaifenesin, and Phenylephrine HCl) | 25% v/v |
| Robitussin Nighttime Cough, Cold, & Flu (Acetaminophen, Diphenhydramine HCl, and Phenylephrine HCl) | 25% v/v |
| Cepacol Sore Throat: Cherry Flavor (Benzocaine and Menthol) | 25% w/v |
| Halls Cherry Mentholyptus (Menthol) | 25% w/v |
| Halls Mentholyptus (Menthol) | 25% w/v |
| Ricola Mountain Herb Throat Drops-Sugar Free (Menthol) | 25% w/v |
| Sucrets Complete-Vapor Cherry (Dyclonine Hydrochloride and Menthol) | 25% w/v |
| Sucrets Complete-Cool Citrus (Dyclonine Hydrochloride and Menthol) | 25% w/v |
| Chlorasceptic Throat Drops-Cherry (Phenol and Glycerin) | 25% w/v |
| BreathSavers 3 Hour Mint-Spearmint (Cetylpyridinium chloride) | 25% w/v |
| Tic Tac Freshmints (Eucalyptol, Menthol, Methylsalicylate, and Thymol) | 25% w/v |
| Whole Blood | 5% v/v |
| Sheep Blood Agar (5% Sheep Blood) | 2.16 mg/mL |
| Horse Blood Agar (5% Horse Blood) | 1.67 mg/mL |
{15}
f. Assay cut-off:
A positive result for the analyte is determined by detection and analysis of the fluorescent signal at the test and reference lines, which are processed by an assay-specific algorithm. The algorithm employs a smoothing algorithm to the data, identifies peak maxima, minima and width, then calculates the RFU value based on peak height for the Strep A test line. When the test line value is $\geq 2,102$ RFU, the test result is positive; when $\leq 2,102$ RFU, the test result is negative. The LoB is 2,102 RFU. The procedural control zone cutoff for a valid versus invalid result is 9,500 RFU. If controls fail at any point, the result is invalid and an error code is presented.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not Applicable
b. Matrix comparison:
Not Applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
The performance of the Sofia Strep A FIA was compared to standard bacterial culture and identification in a multi-center clinical field study. This study was conducted by health care personnel during 2011 and 2012 at eight (8) distinct sites in various geographical regions within the United States and two (2) sites in Australia. In this multi-center, point-of-care (POC) field trial, two (2) throat swabs were collected from 736 patients with symptoms suggestive of bacterial pharyngitis.
One throat swab was transported on cold ice packs to a central Reference Laboratory, streaked on a sheep blood agar plate (SBA) and cultured for up to 48 hours. Immediately after streaking, this same swab was tested in the rapid Sofia Strep A FIA. The performance of the Sofia Strep A FIA was determined by comparison of the rapid test result to the corresponding culture result.
The results from these analyses are presented below:
{16}
# Sofia Strep A FIA Results: Read Now + Walk Away
| | Culture | | | Sens. = 90.6% (116/128)
(95% CI: 84.3 - 94.6%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Pos* | Neg | Total: | |
| Sofia Pos | 116 | 24 | 140 | Spec. = 96.1% (584/608)
(95% CI: 94.2 - 97.3%) |
| Sofia Neg | 12 | 584 | 596 | |
| Total: | 128 | 608 | 736 | PPV = 82.9% (116/140)
NPV = 98.0% (584/596)
Prev. = 17.4% (128/736) |
# Sofia Strep A FIA Results: Read Now Mode
| | Culture | | | Sens. = 89.3% (100/112)
(95% CI: 82.2 - 93.8%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Pos | Neg | Total: | |
| Sofia Pos | 100 | 23 | 123 | Spec. = 96.0% (549/572)
(95% CI: 94.0 - 97.3%) |
| Sofia Neg | 12 | 549 | 561 | |
| Total: | 112 | 572 | 684 | PPV = 81.3% (100/123)
NPV = 97.9% (549/561)
Prev. = 16.4% (112/684) |
# Sofia Strep A FIA Results: Walk Away Mode
| | Culture | | | Sens. = 100% (16/16)
(95% CI: 80.6 - 100%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Pos | Neg | Total: | |
| Sofia Pos | 16 | 1 | 17 | Spec. = 97.2% (35/36)
(95% CI: 85.8 - 99.5%) |
| Sofia Neg | 0 | 35 | 35 | |
| Total: | 16 | 36 | 52 | PPV = 94.1% (16/17)
NPV = 100% (35/35)
Prev. = 30.8% (16/52) |
b. Clinical specificity:
See M 3(a) above.
{17}
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not Applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Group A Streptococcus bacteria are responsible for about 19% of all upper respiratory tract infections (Lauer B.A., Reller L.D., and Mirrett S., Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 17:338-340, 1983). Infection is most prevalent in winter and early spring, with most cases arising in patients living in highly populated areas. Consistent with these figures, in the multi-center clinical study conducted by Quidel during 2011 and 2012, 17.4% (128/736) of the patients presenting with pharyngitis were found to be culture positive for Strep A. Nearly half of these subjects, 46%, were female. The subjects' ages ranged from 3 to 72 years and eighty-eight percent (647/736) were children (3 to 17 years of age).
N. Instrument Name:
Sophia™ Analyzer
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
The Sofia® Strep A FIA can be operated on the Sofia Analyzer in Walk Away Mode (for single use) and in a Read Now Mode (for batch testing in ≥1 minute increments), accommodating different workload operating environments. These are operated-selected modes that allow either the device or the operator to be responsible for the time the sample resides on the strip.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant's Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
Not Applicable
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
18
{18}
Specimen Handling:
The antigen extraction reagent is prepared, added to a tube (up to a predetermined volume line) before the specimen swab is added, agitated and incubated in the reagent. The swab is squeezed dry upon removal and 100 µl of sample is applied to the test strip using an included fixed-volume pipette. The specimen is allowed to sit in the cartridge at room temperature for 5 minutes either in the analyzer or on the bench dependent on the mode of operation selected. User ID and patient ID is then entered either manually or using the external barcode scanner. In Read Now Mode, the cartridge is then inserted and the user presses start. Test results are provided within one minute.
5. Calibration:
The sponsor recommends that the Calibration Check Procedure should be performed every thirty (30) days. The Sofia Analyzer is set to remind the user to complete the Calibration Check Procedure.
The Calibration Check is a required function that checks the Sofia Analyzer optics and calculation systems using a specific Calibration Cassette. This Calibration Cassette is shipped with the Sofia Installation Pack. The Calibration Cassette should be stored in the provided storage pouch between uses to protect it from exposure to light. The Sofia Analyzer User Manual details the Calibration Check Procedure.
6. Quality Control:
QC is performed every 30 days. There are three types of Quality Control for the Sofia Analyzer and Strep A FIA: Sofia Analyzer Calibration Check Procedure (See O 5 above), built-in procedural control features, and External Controls.
External Controls: Each 25-test kit will contain one Positive and one Negative Control swab—each provided separately in a foil pouch with desiccant. The Positive Control swab is spiked with Group A Streptococcus pyogenes cells. The Negative Control swab is spiked with Group C Streptococcus antigens.
The sponsor recommends that External Positive and Negative Controls be run:
- Once for each untrained operator to the Analyzer, and to the specific type of test.
- Once for each new shipment of kits provided that each different lot received in the shipment is tested.
- In accordance with local, state and federal regulations or accreditation requirements.
In-Test Assay Controls: The test strip also has several other chemically built-in control features to ensure that each test run is performed properly. These include the Negative Control (NC) line and the Procedural Control zone.
19
{19}
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Not Applicable
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
20
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.