K123349 · Accutome, Inc. · IYO · Jan 29, 2013 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K123349
Device Name
A-SCAN PLUS CONNECT
Applicant
Accutome, Inc.
Product Code
IYO · Radiology
Decision Date
Jan 29, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K123349 · Jan 29, 2013
A-SCAN PLUS CONNECT
Accutome, Inc.
Clinical patient evaluations
The device was evaluated on 29 patients at 3 different clinical locations by experienced technicians and ophthalmologists to assess safety, functionality, and usability.
Usability; Clinical evaluation; Patient-use data
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
External Validation; Clinical evaluation/usability study
Patients undergoing ophthalmic biometry; Sample Size: 29 patients; Number of Sites: 3
Not applicable for this study
Safety, functionality, and usability (rated on a 1-5 scale)
Indications for Use
This instrument is used for measuring the axial length, anterior chamber depth and lens thickness of the eye. It also is used for calculating the optical power of the IOL to be implanted during cataract surgery.
Device Story
A-Scan Plus Connect is an ophthalmic biometer using pulsed echo ultrasound to measure ocular structures. Device consists of an eye-contact probe connected via a microprocessor-based interface to a personal computer (PC). Probe generates ultrasound pulses; system receives returning echoes, displaying them as a one-dimensional signal with positive peaks representing ocular structures. Clinicians use the PC interface to measure distances between peaks and calculate IOL power. Device is used in clinical settings by ophthalmologists or technicians. PC provides processing, data storage, display, and printing capabilities, replacing the dedicated hardware of the predicate. Benefits include improved usability and accurate biometric measurements for surgical planning.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Physical accuracy testing compared ultrasonic measurements against mechanical dial indicators, meeting 0.1mm acceptance criteria. Data comparison testing against the predicate confirmed ultrasound measurements within 0.05mm and IOL calculations within one decimal place. External validation involved 29 patients across 3 locations, evaluated by 3 experienced technicians/ophthalmologists; safety was ranked 5/5 by all users, with an average usability rating of 4.8/5.
Technological Characteristics
Ultrasonic pulsed echo biometer; 10 MHz transducer. Materials identical to predicate (ISO 10993 compliant). Energy source: USB power from PC. Connectivity: USB interface to PC. Software: Algorithms for ultrasound processing and IOL calculation identical to predicate. Compliance: EN 60601-1, EN 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-2-37.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing cataract surgery requiring measurement of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness for IOL power calculation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system is a device intended to project a pulsed sound beam into body tissue to determine the depth or location of the tissue interfaces and to measure the duration of an acoustic pulse from the transmitter to the tissue interface and back to the receiver. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A biopsy needle guide kit intended for use with an ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K123349
Page 1-1
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows a logo with the word "ACCUTOME" in bold, sans-serif font at the bottom. Above the word is a circular design with a stylized number "4" inside. The number is formed by geometric shapes, with a triangle at the top and a trapezoid at the bottom, creating a modern and abstract look.
## JAN 2 9 2013
l
# 510(k) SUMMARY: A-Scan Plus Connect
Applicant:
Address:
Contact Person:
Preparation Date:
Revision Date:
Trade Name:
Common Name:
Classification Name:
Telephone:
Accutome, Inc.
Note: Accutome Ultrasound, Inc. (listed as the manufacturer for the predicate device) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Accutome, Inc. and is located in the same facility. Accutome, Inc. is in the process of moving all device listings to the Accutome, Inc. name only.
3222 Phoenixville Pike Malvern, PA 19355
Adam Pickholtz Manager QA/QC
(610) 889-0200 (610) 889-3233 Fax
October 26, 2012 December 5, 2012
A-Scan Plus Connect
Biometer
System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic (21 CFR 892.1560, Product Code: IYO)
Diagnostic Ultrasound Transducer (21 CFR 892.1570, Product Code: ITX)
Legally Marketed Predicate Devices:
Accusonic A-Scan (K032956) *There have been no prior FDA submissions for the A-Scan Plus Connect.
Description of the Device:
The Accutome A-Scan Plus Connect device is designed as a biometer, which uses pulsed echo ultrasound to measure the
Accutome, Inc. Fax: 610-889-3233 Page 1 of 5
3222 Phoenixville Pike Malvern, PA 19355 Email: eyeopener@accutome.com
Phone: 610-889-0200 www.accutome.com
{1}------------------------------------------------
axial length, and the location of other structures of the eye. It utilizes an eye-contact probe to generate and receive the ultrasound pulses, and provides a one-dimensional display of returning pulse echoes, with positive peaks to indicate the location of ocular structures. The distance between peaks can be measured.
Indications for Use:
This instrument is used for measuring the axial length, anterior chamber depth and lens thickness of the eye. It also is used for calculating the optical power of the IOL to be implanted during cataract surgery.
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics to the predicate device:
All of the critical functions of the A-scan Plus Connect are calculated in exactly the same manner as in the predicate device Accusonic A-Scan. The probe used with the A-Scan Plus Connect is exactly the same as the probe used on the Accusonic A-Scan. The software algorithms for clinically critical functions, i.e. to process ultrasound measurements and calculate intraocular lens parameters remain exactly the same as in the predicate device.
The new A-Scan Plus Connect model uses the personal computer as the main computing vehicle and display instead of the dedicated computer/display of the predicate device. The software modifications in the Connect model are those necessary to interface the processing, data storage, display, and printing capabilities of the personal computer.
The A-Scan Plus connect control unit is an interface between the ultrasonic probe and a personal computer. It consists of a microprocessor based printed circuit board, with USB connections, enclosed in a plastic case.
The energy source for the A-Scan Plus Connect is USB power from the personal computer instead of the AC to DC adapter used to power the predicate device.
The chemical composition of patient contact materials is identical to that of the predicate device.
Accutome, Inc. Fax: 610-889-3233 Page 2 of 5
3222 Phoenixville Pike Malvern, PA 19355 Email: evenpenen@accutome.com
Phone: 610-889-0200 www.accutome.com
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### Standards Testing:
#### EN 60601-1 Medical Electronic Equipment Part 1: General Requirements for Safety
Both this device and the predicate were tested to, and found to be compliant with EN 60601-1.
#### EN 60601-1-2 Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and Tests
Both this device and the predicate were tested to, and found to be compliant with EN 60601-1-2.
#### IEC 60601-2-37 - Safety of Ultrasonic Medical Diagnostic and Monitoring Equipment
Acertara Acoustic Laboratories evaluated the device in May and June 2012 in accordance with IEC 60601-2-37:2007 and Section 1.6.1 of the September 2008 FDA Guidance Document. Sonora Medical Systems (now Acertara Acoustic Laboratories) evaluated the predicate device in March 2002 in accordance with Section 4.6.1 of the September 1997 FDA Guidance Document.
#### EN/ISO 10993 - Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices
Compliance per Toxikon Test Reports 03-1518-G1 dated 03 April 2003, 03-1518-G2 dated 16 May 2003, and 03-1518-G3 dated 18 April 2003. The same probe is used with this device as with the predicate device; the materials have not changed.
#### Verification Testing:
#### Physical Accuracy Test
This test compares the distance measured ultrasonically by the A-Scan Plus Connect and the physical distance measured by a mechanical dial indicator. The test results for both the A-Scan Plus Connect model and the predicate device were well within the 0.1mm acceptance criteria.
#### Results:
Both the A-scan Plus Connect model and the predicate device were well within the 0.1mm acceptance criteria.
#### Data Comparison Test: Accusonic A-Scan (predicate) vs. A-Scan Plus Connect
The objective of this test is to compare critical parameter results between the two devices under conditions of the same input test fixture and values.
Accutome, Inc. Fax: 610-889-3233 Page 3 of 5
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Results:
All of the data met the established acceptance criteria:
-Ultrasound measurements for all eye types shall be within 0.05mm
-IOL calculation results for all formulas shall be within one decimal place
#### Validation Testing:
#### Internal Validation Tests
A test plan was developed to evaluate proper operation and usability for all device modes/options. The plan consisted of 83(as of 12/5/12) specific evaluations of characteristics of the device, most of which required multiple actions or observations on the part of the user.
#### Results:
All operations and features were fully functional. There were no errors or deficiencies in the patient information. The usability was judged to be superior to the predicate device.
#### External Validation Tests
A checklist was developed which requests quantified critique regarding the safety, functionality and usability of the device via 11 specific questions. A Rating Scale from 1 to 5 was used with:
5 = best, very user friendly, no problems; and 1 = not acceptable, very unfriendly, significant problem that must be corrected.
#### Results:
The device was evaluated on 29 different patients at 3 different locations by 3 different experienced
technicians/ophthalmologists. One of the users had detailed experience with the predicate device and two with a competitive biometer.
Safety was ranked 5 by every user. The average rating for the 9 specific attributes enumerated was 4.8. The "Overall Rating" of the device was 5 by all users. There were no ratings of 1 or 2 in any of the tests.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Validation Tests Summary
The internal and external validation tests demonstrate that there are no known safety issues with the A-Scan Plus Connect device.
The tests further demonstrate that there are no significant functionality issues and that the usability of the device is superior to that of the predicate device.
#### Conclusion:
The positive results of the testing above, along with the risk analysis performed, demonstrate that the A-Scan Plus Connect is at least as safe and as effective, and has improved usability, when compared to the predicate device.
Accutome, Inc. Fax: 610-889-3233 Page 5 of 5
....
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle or bird-like symbol with three curved lines forming its body and wings. The logo is surrounded by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
February 13, 2013
Accutome, Inc c/o Adam Pickholtz Regulatory Manager 3222 Phoenixville Pike MALVERN PA 19355
Re: K123349
Trade/Device Name: A-Scan Plus Connect Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1560 Regulation Name: Ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: IYO and ITX Dated: January 17, 2013 Received: January 22, 2013
Dear Mr. Pickholtz:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of January 29, 2013.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
This determination of substantial equivalence applies to the following transducer intended for use with the A-Scan Plus Connect, as described in your premarket notification:
#### 10 mhz
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Pickholtz
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements. including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus permits your device to proceed to market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH0ffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter, please contact Robert Ochs at (301) 796-6661.
Sincerely yours,
Sean M. Boyd -\$_{for}\$
Janine M. Morris Director, Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
Page 1-1
510(k) Number (if known): K123349
Device Name: A-scan Plus Connect
Indications for Use:
This instrument is used for measuring the axial length, anterior chamber depth and lens thickness of the eye. It also is used for calculating the optical power of the IOL to be implanted during cataract surgery.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (OIR)
# Sean M. Boyd -S
(Division Sign Off) Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostic and Radiological Health
510(k)_ K123349
Page 1 of __1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
{8}------------------------------------------------
### Tab 2- IFU Tables
## System: Accutome A-Scan Plus Connect
| Clinical Application | | Mode of Operation | | | | | | |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|-------------------|---|-----|-----|------------------|-----------------------|---------------------|
| General<br>(Track 1 Only) | Specific<br>(Tracks 1 & 3) | A | M | PWD | CWD | Color<br>Doppler | Combined<br>(Specify) | Other*<br>(Specify) |
| Ophthalmic | Ophthalmic | P | | | | | | |
| Fetal Imaging &<br>Other | Fetal | | | | | | | |
| | Abdominal | | | | | | | |
| | Intra-operative (Specify) | | | | | | | |
| | Intra-operative (Neuro) | | | | | | | |
| | Laparoscopic | | | | | | | |
| | Pediatric | | | | | | | |
| | Small Organ (Specify) | | | | | | | |
| | Neonatal Cephalic | | | | | | | |
| | Adult Cephalic | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-rectal | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-vaginal | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-urethral | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-esoph. (non-Card.) | | | | | | | |
| | Musculo-skeletal<br>(Conventional) | | | | | | | |
| | Musculo-skeletal<br>(Superficial) | | | | | | | |
| | Intravascular | | | | | | | |
| | Other (Specify) | | | | | | | |
| Cardiac | Cardiac Adult | | | | | | | |
| | Cardiac Pediatric | | | | | | | |
| | Intravascular (Cardiac) | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-esoph. (Cardiac) | | | | | | | |
| | Intra-cardiac | | | | | | | |
| | Other (Specify) | | | | | | | |
| Peripheral | Peripheral vessel | | | | | | | |
| Vessel | Other (Specify) | | | | | | | |
N = new indication; P = previously cleared by FDA; E = added under this appendix
* Examples of other modes of operation may include: B-mode, Amplitude Doppler, 3-D Imaging, Harmonic Imaging, Tissue Motion Doppler, and Color Velocity Imaging
Image /page/8/Picture/5 description: The image shows the name "Sean M. Boyd" in bold, black font. Below the name, in smaller font, is the text "(Division Sign Off)". To the right of the name is the letter "S".
Division of Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health
K123349 510(k)
{9}------------------------------------------------
#### Transducer: 10 mhz
| Clinical Application | | Mode of Operation | | | | | | |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|-------------------|---|-----|-----|------------------|-----------------------|---------------------|
| General<br>(Track 1 Only) | Specific<br>(Tracks 1 & 3) | A | M | PWD | CWD | Color<br>Doppler | Combined<br>(Specify) | Other*<br>(Specify) |
| Ophthalmic | Ophthalmic | P | | | | | | |
| Fetal Imaging &<br>Other | Fetal | | | | | | | |
| | Abdominal | | | | | | | |
| | Intra-operative (Specify) | | | | | | | |
| | Intra-operative (Neuro) | | | | | | | |
| | Laparoscopic | | | | | | | |
| | Pediatric | | | | | | | |
| | Small Organ (Specify) | | | | | | | |
| | Neonatal Cephalic | | | | | | | |
| | Adult Cephalic | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-rectal | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-vaginal | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-urethral | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-esoph. (non-Card.) | | | | | | | |
| | Musculo-skeletal<br>(Conventional) | | | | | | | |
| | Musculo-skeletal<br>(Superficial) | | | | | | | |
| | Intravascular | | | | | | | |
| | Other (Specify) | | | | | | | |
| Cardiac | Cardiac Adult | | | | | | | |
| | Cardiac Pediatric | | | | | | | |
| | Intravascular (Cardiac) | | | | | | | |
| | Trans-esoph. (Cardiac) | | | | | | | |
| | Intra-cardiac | | | | | | | |
| | Other (Specify) | | | | | | | |
| Peripheral | Peripheral vessel | | | | | | | |
| Vessel | Other (Specify) | | | | | | | |
N = new indication; P = previously cleared by FDA; E = added under this appendix
* Examples of other modes of operation may include: B-mode, Amplitude Doppler, 3-D Imaging, Harmonic Imaging, Tissue Motion Doppler, and Color Velocity Imaging
# Sean M. Boyd -S
(Division Sign Off)
Division of Radiological Health
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Heattr
KI23349 510((4)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.