IDS ISYS 1,25 DIHYDROXY VITAMIN D, IDS-ISYS, 1,25 DIHYDROXY VITAMIN D CONTROL SET, AND IDS ISYS 1,25 DIHYDROXY VITAMIN D
K123253 · Immunodiagnostic Systems , Ltd. · MRG · Jun 18, 2013 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K123253
Device Name
IDS ISYS 1,25 DIHYDROXY VITAMIN D, IDS-ISYS, 1,25 DIHYDROXY VITAMIN D CONTROL SET, AND IDS ISYS 1,25 DIHYDROXY VITAMIN D
Applicant
Immunodiagnostic Systems , Ltd.
Product Code
MRG · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jun 18, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1825
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay is intended for the quantitative determination of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D levels in serum and plasma on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. Results of the 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D are used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency. The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Control Set is used for quality control of the IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Calibration Verifier is a device intended for medical purposes for use in the quantitative verification of calibration of the IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay when performed on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated Analyzer.
Device Story
The IDS iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay is an in vitro diagnostic test performed on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. It measures 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D levels in serum and plasma samples. The system automates the assay process, providing quantitative results used by clinicians to assess a patient's vitamin D status. The device includes a control set for quality assurance and calibration verifiers to ensure the accuracy of the automated analyzer. It is intended for professional use in clinical laboratory settings.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; substantial equivalence is based on bench testing and performance characteristics of the assay on the IDS-iSYS platform.
Technological Characteristics
Competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay. Components: mouse monoclonal anti-1,25D antibody (immunopurification), biotinylated sheep anti-1,25D antibody, acridinium ester conjugate, streptavidin-coated magnetic particles. Automated on IDS-iSYS system. Reagents contain bovine serum albumin, sodium azide (<1.0%), and sheep proteins. Calibration: 2-point, user-initiated every 14 days. Sterilization: not specified. Connectivity: standalone automated analyzer.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in serum and plasma for the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency in adults. For prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vitamin D test system is a device intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) and other hydroxylated metabolites of vitamin D in serum or plasma to be used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Vitamin D test systems must comply with the following special controls:(1) Labeling in conformance with 21 CFR 809.10 and
(2) Compliance with existing standards of the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Predicate Devices
Immunodiagnostic Systems Gamma-B 1, 25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D and Control Set (k042519)
Immunodiagnostic Systems Gamma-B 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D Calibration Verifiers (k122141)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k123253
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Immunodiagnostic Systems Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
IDS iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D
IDS iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Control Set
IDS iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Calibration Verifier
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MRG | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1825
Vitamin D Test System | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| JJX | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR 862.1660
Quality Control Material | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay is intended for the quantitative determination of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D levels in serum and plasma on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. Results of the 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D are used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.
The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Control Set is used for quality control of the IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System
The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Calibration Verifier is a device intended for medical purposes for use in the quantitative verification of calibration of the IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay when performed on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated Analyzer.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use with the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System (IS-310400)
I. Device Description:
The IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D kit is an assay system intended for the purification of 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D in human serum or plasma by offline immunopurification followed by quantitative determination on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. The components of the assay kit are described below.
IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D kit
IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D kit contains the immunoextraction kit, reagent cartridge, two (2) calibrators (A&B) and a mini CD.
The Immunoextraction kit contains the following reagents: 100 immunocapsules containing mouse monoclonal antibody to 1,25D linked to solid phase particles in suspension with vitamin D binding protein inhibitor (SORB), a delipidation reagent (REAG1), a solution of dextran sulphate and magnesium chloride, an elution reagent (REAG2), ethanol, an assay buffer (BUF) with MOPS buffer containing bovine serum
{2}
albumin with 0.01% sodium azide.
The reagent cartridge contains magnetic particles (MP), coated with streptavidin in a phosphate buffer containing bovine serum albumin and <0.1% sodium azide as preservative, a conjugate 1,25D labeled with an acridinium ester derivative in a phosphate buffer containing bovine serum albumin with <0.1% sodium azide as preservative (CONJ),; Anti-1,25D polyclonal antibody labeled with biotin (Ab-BIOT), in a phosphate buffer containing sheep proteins with 0.01% sodium azide as preservative, and a wash buffer (BUFD).
Two calibrators are provided for use with the kit. IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Calibrator A (19.0 – 29.0 pg/mL) and Calibrator B (100.0 – 130.0 pg/mL) are provided lyophilized in MOPS buffer containing bovine serum albumin, 1,25Dihydroxy Vitamin D and <1.0% sodium azide as preservative.
## IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D kit Control kit
The IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D Control set contains control sets (CTL1 & CTL2), extraction control sets (CTL3 & CTL4) and a mini CD. The controls (CTL1 & CTL2) are lyophilized 1,25D in buffered matrix with >0.1% (w/w) sodium azide as a preservative. The extraction controls are used to verify the validity of the sample results and must be used in parallel to the patient sample in the pretreatment procedure (extraction). Extraction controls (CTL3 & CTL4) are lyophilized 1,25D in human serum buffered with >0.1% (w/w) sodium azide as a preservative.
## The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Calibration Verifier
The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Calibration Verifier set contains four levels of different concentrations of 1,25 D. Calibration verifiers are lyophilized MOPS buffer containing bovine serum albumin, 1,25D and sodium azide as preservative (<1.0%). 2 vials each of Cal. Ver. 0 – 3 (1.2mL per vial) are provided with the kit.
Human material used in the preparation of the product above has been tested by FDA recommended assays for the presence of antibody to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV I and II), Hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to Hepatitis C, and found negative.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Immunodiagnostic Systems Gamma-B 1, 25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D and Control Set
Immunodiagnostic Systems Gamma-B 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D Calibration Verifiers
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
{3}
k042519
k122141
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Parameter | Predicate Device (k042519) | Candidate device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25D) in human serum or plasma. | Same |
| Measurand | 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D | Same |
| Sample matrix | Serum or plasma | Same |
| Antibodies | Monoclonal mouse anti-1,25D antibody for the purification and polyclonal sheep anti-25D antibody for the assay | Same |
| Sample volume | 500 μL | 500 μL |
| Method of detection | Radioactivity using Anti-sheep IgG coupled to cellulose solid phase and 125I label | Chemiluminescence using magnetic-particle solid phase and acridinium label |
| Calibration | Full standard curve to be run with each assay run. | User -initiated 2 point calibration to adjust the batch related master curve. Performed every 14 days. The system stores the calibration for the interval specified in the kit IFU. |
| Quality Control | Requires two serum based extraction quality control samples. The QC samples are supplied with the Kits. | Requires two buffer based assay controls to validate the calibration and two serum based extraction quality control samples to verify the validity of the sample results. The IDS-iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D Control Set supplied |
| Measuring Range | 6 – 208 pg/mL | 7.5 – 210.0 pg/mL |
| Reference range | 20.2 – 63.0 pg/mL | 26.1 – 95.0 pg/mL |
| Assay Duration | >24 hrs | ~ 5.5 hrs |
{4}
| Controls | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Parameter | Predicate Device (k042519) | Candidate device |
| Intended Use | Used for the quality control of the 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay | Same |
| Format | Lyophilized | Same |
| Stability | Store at 2-8°C until expiration date | Same |
| Analyte | 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D | Same |
| Matrix | Serum based material | Assay controls are buffered matrix containing 1,25D. Extraction controls are buffered human serum matrix containing 1,25D |
| Calibration Verifiers | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Performance | Predicate Device(k122141) | New device |
| Intended Use | Used for the quantitative verification of calibration of the IDS-iSYS IGF-I assay. | Used for the quantitative verification of calibration of the IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay. |
| Format | Lyophilized | Same |
| Stability | Store at 2-8°C until expiration date | Same |
| Analyte | IGF-I | 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D |
| Matrix | Buffered protein | Bovine serum with sodium azide preservative |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI C28-A2 How to Define and Determine Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory
CLSI EP5-A2 Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods
CLSI EP6-A Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach
CLSI EP7-A2 Inference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
CLSI EP9-A Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
CLSI EP17-A Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantification
CEN 13640 Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents
{5}
L. Test Principle:
The IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D kit is a complete assay system for the purification of 1,25D in patient samples by immunopurification followed by quantitation by one-site chemiluminescent immunoassay on the automated IDS-iSYS instrument.
Patient samples are to be delipidated and 1,25D extracted from potential cross-reactants by incubation for 3 hours with a highly specific solid phase monoclonal anti-1,25D. 500 μL of the patient serum or plasma and the extraction controls (included in the The IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D Control kit) are individually mixed with delipidation reagent and vortex and centrifuged. The calibrators and controls (CTL1, CTL2) do not undergo this step. Next the delipidated sample (150μL) undergoes immunoextraction. 150μL of delipidated sample or extraction controls are individually added to an immunocapsule which contains a gel containing a monoclonal anti-1,25D antibody. Rotation of the immunocapsule allows the binding of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25D) to the monoclonal antibody. The gel is washed to remove potential cross-reactants and the 1,25D eluted with ethanol. Eluates are reconstituted. Immunopurified samples are placed into the IDS-iSYS sample rack; the sample rack is then loaded on the IDS-iSYS system. 120 μL of the reconstituted immunopurified samples are incubated with the biotinylated sheep anti-1,25D antibody. The 1,25D-acridinium conjugate is then added which competes for antibody binding sites. Streptavidin coated magnetic particles are then added and following a further incubation step, the particles are washed to remove unbound materials. Following the addition of trigger reagents, a flash chemiluminescent reaction is initiated. The light signal is measured by the photomultiplier as Relative Light Units (RLU) and is inversely proportional to the amount of 1,25D present in the samples.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
All performance evaluations were conducted with the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The sponsor evaluated the precision of the IDS iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay according to the CLSI EP5-A guideline. To assess reproducibility samples were assayed in duplicate, twice a day, for 20 days for an n=80. 4 controls (assay controls and extraction controls) and 4 patient samples were used in the precision study. All serum based samples underwent the imunoextraction process. Three IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated Systems were used (one per each reagent batch) and operated by a total of four personnel during the study. Precision results using one representative lot are summarized in the table below:
6
{6}
| ID | Mean (pg/mL) | n | Within-run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| Sample 1 | 17.0 | 80 | 2.1 | 12.2% | 3.1 | 18.0% |
| Sample 2 | 60.9 | 80 | 4.2 | 6.9% | 6.6 | 10.8% |
| Sample 3 | 127.8 | 80 | 6.5 | 5.1% | 13.6 | 10.6% |
| Sample 4 | 147.9 | 80 | 6.2 | 4.2% | 16.3 | 11.0% |
| CTL1 | 37.2 | 80 | 2.4 | 6.3% | 3.3 | 8.8% |
| CTL2 | 98.6 | 80 | 3.9 | 3.9% | 7.1 | 7.2% |
| Extraction CTL3 | 44.9 | 80 | 3.3 | 7.4% | 5.3 | 11.9% |
| Extraction CTL4 | 106.4 | 76 | 5.9 | 5.5% | 10.9 | 10.2% |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The sponsor evaluated linearity according to the CLSI EP6-A guideline. Spiked serum sample with high 1,25 Dihydroxy vitamin D was used in the study. The high sample was diluted with low charcoal stripped, lipid stripped serum to achieve nine dilutions for the linearity study. All samples (11 totals) were tested in duplicate, covering the entire claimed measuring range (4.5 pg/mL to 210 mg/dL) of the 1,25 D assay.
The linear regression generated was: $1.01\mathrm{x} + 1.67\mathrm{R}^2 = 1.00$
The results of the study support the sponsor's claim that the assay is linear across the measuring range of 7.5 to $210~\mathrm{pg / mL}$ .
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability
The ISD-iSYS 1,25D assay has been standardized against in-house reference standards. The calibrators and controls are manufactured using an internal in-house procedure and an internal reference standard.. The concentration of a $1^{\mathrm{st}}$ primary internal reference calibrator set was calculated by UV quantification using molar extinction coefficient 19000 at an absorbance of $264\mathrm{nm}$ .
Value assignments
The calibrators are value assigned by running duplicates in multiple assays on one instrument and must meet the internal specification. The assay controls are value assigned with the IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D reagent with an on-board 2 point calibration. The assay controls are run in triplicate in multiple assays on at least three analyzers. The extraction controls are run in triplicate in multiple assays on at
{7}
least three analyzers. The extraction controls undergo the immuno-extraction process in each run. The control ranges are then calculated as the mean ± 3 standard deviations with an internal specification for acceptance.
The value assignment of the calibration verifiers is performed the same way as the kit assay controls.
The 1,25D calibrators have the following target ranges:
- Calibrator A = 19.0 – 29.0 pg/mL
- Calibrator B = 100.0 – 130.0 pg/mL
The 1, 25D Calibration verifiers have the following target ranges:
- Calibration Verifiers 0 = below measuring range
- Calibration Verifiers 1 = 20.0 – 30.0 pg/mL
- Calibration Verifiers 2 = 85.0 – 115.0 pg/mL
- Calibration Verifiers 3 = 195.0 – 240.0 pg/mL
The 1,25 D controls have the following target ranges:
- CTL1 = 29.0 – 41.0 pg/mL
- CTL2 = 77.0 – 104.0 pg/mL
- CTL3 = 29.0 – 41.0 pg/mL
- CTL4 = 77.0 – 104.0 pg/mL
## Stability
Stability of IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay cartridges, IDS iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D calibrators, IDS iSYS 1,25 Dihydroxy Vitamin D controls, and calibration verifiers were assessed using real-time and accelerated stability studies. Protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable to support the cartridge open-vial stability claim of 28 days when stored at the recommended storage temperatures of 2 - 8 °C. For shelf-life stability, the sponsor claimed that the controls and calibration verifiers are stable for 28 days at -20 °C with a maximum of 2 freeze/thaw and the calibrators are stable for 28 days when stored at -20 °C. Once reconstituted, the on-board stability of the calibration verifiers are 3 hours at 2 - 8 °C and extraction controls are 90 minutes. The extraction controls may also be stored at either 2 - 8 °C or -20 °C for 2 days after reconstitution.
## c. Detection limit:
The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantitation (LoQ) were determined based on the CLSI EP17-A.
8
{8}
LoB: For the determination of LoB, 10 replicates of calibrator A were run together with 3 replicates of calibrator B-G. The assay measurements were performed over multiple assay runs with one run per day using 3 lots of reagents to collect a minimum number of 60 measurements as required by the guideline. Two lots of calibrator sets and 2 analyzers were used over the LoB study. One analyzer was used for one reagent batch. Sponsor determined that LoB = mean (blank) + [1.645 x SD (blank)] supporting the sponsor's claim of LoB = 2.8 pg/mL.
LoD: The LoD was tested using 6, low charcoal lipid stripped serum and diluted serum samples in 6.0 – 12.7 pg/mL concentration range with each reagent batch. A total of 3 reagent lots were used for the measurement. Each sample was run in duplicate over 6 assay runs. Each sample underwent the entire immunoextraction process prior to measuring on the iSYS Multi-Discipline automated system analyzer. Each sample was analyzed in replicates and the LoD was calculated as:
$$
\mathrm{LoD} = \mathrm{LoB} + 1.645 \times \text{pooled SD. Sponsor determined that the LoD} = 5.5 \mathrm{pg/mL}
$$
LoQ was calculated when the % CV of the measured concentration on the iSYS was plotted against the measured concentration. The LOQ is the concentration which yields an inter-assay precision of ≤20 %. Sponsor determined that the LoQ = 7.5 pg/mL
The measuring range of the 1,25 D assay is 7.5 to 210 pg/mL.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference study:
To determine potential interference in the specific detection of 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D, two base serum samples at two different clinically relevant concentrations of 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D (32 pg/mL and 165 pg/mL) were spiked with the potential interference substances. The interference materials were each spiked into both samples. One reagent batch was used for the interference testing. The differences observed between the mean spiked and control sample values were examined and assessed according to acceptance criteria. The sponsor defined significant interference as <10% difference between the spiked and the control samples.
Interference was calculated using:
$$
\frac{\% \text{Interference} = (\text{mean spiked value} - \text{mean control value})}{\text{mean control value}} \times 100
$$
The following are the highest concentration tested without significant interference:
{9}
| Triglycerides | 1000 mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | 200 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 20 mg/dL |
| Albumin | 9.1 g/dL |
| Red Blood Cells | 0.4% |
| Cholesterol | 300 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 300 nM |
| HAMA | 1000 ng/mL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 2079 IU/mL |
Since hemolyzed samples will affect the results, the sponsor has the following limitations in their labeling:
"Hemolyzed samples should not be used with this assay."
## Cross reactivity study:
To assess cross-reactivity, nine potential cross reactants were spiked into analyte free serum and tested on the candidate device. A reference preparation was performed side by side with the cross-reactant using the 1,25(OH)2D3 antigen. The %cross-reactivity was calculated from the ED50 results of the displacement curves of the serial dilutions using the formula below and the % cross reactivity results are summarized in the table below.
$$
(ED50_{1,25(OH)2D3}/ED50_{cross-reactant}) \times 100
$$
| Potential Cross-reactant | Cross-reactivity |
| --- | --- |
| 1,25(OH)2D3 | 97.6% |
| 1,25(OH)2D2 | 75% |
| 1,24,25,(OH)3D3 | 92% |
| 25(OH)D3 | 0.0015% |
| 25(OH)D2 | 0.0009% |
| 24,25(OH)2D3 | 0.006% |
| 24,25(OH)2D2 | 0.005% |
| Epi-25(OH)D3 | < 0.0015% |
| Alfacalcidol | 0.04% |
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
## 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
{10}
The sponsor performed a method comparison study according to the CLSI EP9-A2 guideline. Results from the candidate device were compared to those obtained using the predicate device. A total of 121 serum samples with concentrations across the reportable range of the assay were used for the method comparison study. Six normal samples were diluted to achieve more samples close to the bottom of the assay range. All samples were serum and the sample range tested was 10.7 to 197.5 pg/mL. The following are the results from the Passing Bablok regression analysis: y = 1.00x - 2.8; r = 0.95.
Slope = 1.00 (95% CI = 0.93 to 1.07)
Intercept = -2.8 pg/mL (95% CI = -6.3 pg/mL to 0.4 pg/mL).
Calculation of the correlation coefficient using linear regression was r = 0.95.
b. Matrix comparison:
To assess the effect of anticoagulants on the performance of the IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D assay the results obtained from plasma sample tube were compared to results obtained from samples drawn into the following tubes: serum (without additives), serum separator tubes (SST), potassium EDTA plasma, lithium heparin plasma and sodium heparin plasma. A total of 19 paired tubes were tested using 3 lots of reagents against the plain serum tube. Sample range tested between 12.6 to 210 pg/mL. The results from Passing-Bablok analysis are presented below:
Serum separator tubes: y = 1.00 x serum + 1.26 pg/mL R² = 0.99
K2 EDTA plasma tubes: y = 1.01 x serum + 0.57 pg/mL R² = 1.00
Li Heparin plasma tubes: y = 1.02 x serum + 0.23 pg/mL R² = 0.99,
Na Heparin plasma tubes: y = 1.01 x serum - 1.30 pg/mL R² = 0.99,
The sponsor concluded that the assay could be performed using serum (standard serum tubes or tubes containing serum separating gel) or plasma (lithium heparin, sodium heparin or potassium EDTA) samples. Samples should be separated as soon as possible after collection.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
11
{11}
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The reference interval was determined by using 119 serum samples from apparently healthy male and female (62 male, 59 female) subjects, aged 18-60, collected in standard serum sample tubes. Ethnicity was as follows: Caucasian 66 (54.5%) and Hispanic 55 (45.5%). The 95% reference interval for 1,25-Dihydroxy Vitamin D was calculated by a non-parametric method following the CLSI C28-A2 guideline.
Normal Adults: 26.1 – 95.0 pg/mL.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.