The Triathlon Triathlon® All-Polyethylene Condylar Stabilizing (CS) and Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Tibial Implants are for cemented use in primary and revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Device Story
The Triathlon All-Polyethylene Tibial Implants are orthopedic prosthetic components for total knee arthroplasty. These all-polyethylene tibial inserts (CS and PS designs) function as part of a knee replacement system to restore joint function and stability. The device is implanted by an orthopedic surgeon in a clinical/hospital setting. It replaces damaged articular surfaces of the tibia, articulating with femoral components. The device provides mechanical support and stability to the knee joint, addressing pain and deformity. It is designed for cemented fixation to the bone. The device benefits patients by restoring mobility and reducing pain associated with degenerative or traumatic joint disease.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence was established through non-clinical bench testing, specifically deflection and micromotion testing, comparing the subject device to the Scorpio All-Poly Tibial Implant and existing Triathlon inserts.
Technological Characteristics
All-polyethylene tibial components for cemented total knee arthroplasty. Features CS and PS designs. Incorporates a line-to-line boss with a flat posterior section on the keel to ensure even cement mantle distribution. Materials and articular geometry are equivalent to existing Triathlon inserts. Designed for cemented use only.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with painful, disabling knee joint disease (osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis), post-traumatic loss of joint function, moderate varus/valgus/flexion deformity, revision of failed knee replacement, or distal femur/proximal tibia fractures. PS implants are additionally indicated for ligamentous instability, absent/non-functioning posterior cruciate ligament, or severe anteroposterior instability. Indicated for cemented use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
K123166
1/3
# 510(k) Summary
# FEB 1 4 2013
| Sponsor | Howmedica Osteonics Corp.<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430 |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person | Audrey Witko<br>Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist<br>Howmedica Osteonics Corp.<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430<br>Phone: 201-831-6717/Fax: 201-831-3717 |
| Date Prepared: | October 8, 2012, revised February 11, 2013 |
| Proprietary Name: | Triathlon® All-Polyethylene Condylar Stabilizing (CS) and Posterior<br>Stabilizing (PS) Tibial Implants |
| Common Name: | Total Knee Replacement |
| Classification Name: | Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-<br>constrained cemented prosthesis - 888.3560 |
| Product Code: | JWH - Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained,<br>cemented, polymer/metal/polymer |
Legally Marketed Device to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed: Triathlon® Condylar Stabilizing (CS) Lipped Insert: K063423 Triathlon® Posterior Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System: K050539, K042993 and K031729 Scorpio Posterior Cruciate Retaining (CR) Total Knee System All-Poly Tibia: K974556 Scorpio Posteriorly Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System All Poly Tibia: K962152 Triathlon® TS Knee System: K072221
Device Description: The subject devices are a line extension to the Triathlon® Total Knee System (K063423, K050539, K042993 and K031729), providing an all-polyethylene tibial component in CS and PS designs. The All-Poly CS and PS Tibial implants are similar in intended use, design, materials, mechanical testing and operational priniciples as the predicate devices. These components are designed for cemented use only.
There have been no prior submissions for these devices.
These implants are compatible for use with the Triathlon® PS, TS and CR Femoral Components (cemented and uncemented), Triathlon® PS and CR Femoral Components with PA (uncemented), Triathlon® Symmetrical Patellar Component [Conventional or X30 UHMWE] (cemented), Triathlon® Asymmetrical Patellar Component [Conventional or X3® UHMWPE]
{1}------------------------------------------------
(cemented), Triathlon® Metal-Backed Patellar Component with PA (uncemented), Duracon® Symmetric Patellar Component (cemented). Duracon Asymmetric Patellar Component (cemented), and Duracon® Inset Patellar Component (cemented).
Intended Use: The Triathlon Triathlon® All-Polyethylene Condylar Stabilizing (CS) and Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Tibial Implants are for cemented use in primary and revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
# Indications:
General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from: non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis.
- Post-traumatic loss of knee joint configuration and function.
- Moderate varus, valgus, or flexion deformity in which the ligamentous structures can be returned to adequate function and stability.
- Revision of previous unsuccessful knee replacement or other procedure.
- Fracture of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia that cannot be stabilized by standard fracture management techniques.
Additional General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications specific to the PS implant:
- Ligamentous instability requiring implant bearing surface geometries with increased constraint.
- Absent or non-functioning posterior cruciate ligament.
- Severe anteroposterior instability of the knee joint.
The Triathlon All Polyethylene tibial components are indicated for cemented use only.
Summary of Technologies: The Triathlon All-Poly Tibial Implant is designed to be substantially equivalent to the Scorpio All-Poly Tibial Implant and the Triathlon polyethylene inserts. The Triathlon All-Poly Tibial Implant articular surface and periphery is designed equivalently to the existing Triathlon inserts. The bottom side of the All-Poly Tibial Implant is designed with the Scorpio All-Poly Tibial Implant cement features to which was added a line to line boss with flat posterior section that ensures the cement mantle is even around the keel (the Scorpio design allows the keel to be shifted and have varying cement thicknesses).
Non-Clinical Testing: Deflection and Micromotion testing were performed to verify design and establish the basis for substantial equivalence. Micromotion testing was conducted to show the difference in force/motion that the cement and bone interface would see in response to the change of articulation and periphery when utilizing the Scorpio cement features. The deflection test was conducted to make sure that the stiffness (and strength) of the Triathlon All-Poly Tibial Implant component was equivalent or better then the Scorpio All-Poly Tibial Implant with change to the articulation and periphery. Device comparison showed that the proposed device is substantially equivalent in intended use, materials and performance characteristics to the predicate devices.
Clinical Testing: Clinical testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Conclusion: The Triathlon® All-Polyethylene Condylar Stabilizing (CS) and Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Tibial Implants are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices identified in this premarket notification.
.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare. The words "HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the symbol. The word "DEPART" is at the bottom of the logo.
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
February 14, 2013
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation % Ms. Audrey Witko Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 325 Corporate Drive Mahwah, New Jersey 07430
Re: K123166
Trade/Device Name: Triathlon® All-Polyethylene Condylar Stabilizing (CS) and Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Tibia Implants
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560
Regulation Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis
Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH Dated: January 8, 2013 Received: January 15, 2013
Dear Ms. Witko:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Ms. Audrey Witko
comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Erin Keith
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K123166
Device Name: Triathlon® All-Polyethylene Condylar Stabilizing (CS) & Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Tibia Implants
#### Indications for Use:
General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from: non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis
- Post-traumatic loss of knee joint configuration and function
- Moderate varus, valgus, or flexion deformity in which the ligamentous structures can be returned to adequate function and stability
- Revision of previous unsuccessful knee replacement or other procedure
- Fracture of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia that cannot be stabilized by standard fracture management techniques
Additional General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications specific to the PS implant:
- Ligamentous instability requiring implant bearing surface geometries with increased constraint
- Absent or non-functioning posterior cruciate ligament
- Severe anteroposterior instability of the knee joint
The Triathlon All Polyethylene tibial components are indicated for cemented use only.
Over-The-Counter Use Prescription Use AND/OR > (21 CFR 807 Subpart C) (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Anton E. Dmitriev, PhD 3.02.14 11:11:17 -05'00' Division of Orthopedic Devices
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.