K122435 · Nova Biomedical Corporation · LFR · Dec 20, 2012 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K122435
Device Name
NOVA ONE BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITOR
Applicant
Nova Biomedical Corporation
Product Code
LFR · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 20, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in venous, arterial and fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and forearm. It is intended for testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) and is intended for multiple-patient use in a professional healthcare setting as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control program. This system should only be used with single-use, auto-disabling lancets. The Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes, and it is not intended for use on neonates. Alternative site testing on the forearm should be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions. Nova One Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the Nova One Blood Glucose Monitors for quantitatively measuring glucose in venous, arterial and fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and forearm. Nova Max Control Solutions are intended for use with the Nova Max, Nova Max One and Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results. There are three levels of controls, (Levels 1, 2, 3).
Device Story
Hand-held blood glucose monitor; uses Nova One test strips with GDH-FAD chemistry; electrochemical coulometric sensing. Input: whole blood sample (venous, arterial, capillary) via capillary action into test strip. Operation: user-prompted via three-button keypad; audible/visual feedback. Output: quantitative glucose concentration (mg/dL) displayed on screen; data stored in nonvolatile memory. Used in professional healthcare settings; operated by clinicians. Benefits: aids diabetes management; supports multiple-patient use; provides rapid results (4 seconds).
Clinical Evidence
Clinical and laboratory studies conducted with healthcare professionals and lay users. Results demonstrated that venous/arterial blood glucose measurements are substantially equivalent to capillary blood measurements and central laboratory methods. No new safety or effectiveness issues identified.
Technological Characteristics
Hand-held monitor; electrochemical coulometric sensor. Test strips utilize GDH-FAD enzyme and ferricyanide mediator. 3V coin cell battery power. 4-second analysis time. 20-600 mg/dL measuring range. 0.4 µL sample volume. Nonvolatile data storage for 400 tests. No user calibration coding required.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative glucose measurement in venous, arterial, and capillary whole blood (finger/forearm) to monitor diabetes control in professional healthcare settings. Contraindicated for neonates. Alternative site testing (forearm) restricted to steady-state glucose conditions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Nova Max One Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k112638)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k122435
B. Purpose for Submission:
Extension of indication for use to include more sample types (add venous, arterial whole blood) and multiple-patient use to a previously cleared single-patient use meter
C. Measurand:
Venous, arterial and capillary whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Amperometric method, Glucose dehydrogenase (FAD)
E. Applicant:
Nova Biomedical Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LFR – Glucose dehydrogenase, glucose | Class II | 21 CFR § 862.1345 | 75- Chemistry |
| NBW, Blood Glucose Test System, Over-the-Counter | Class II | 21 CFR § 862.1345 | 75- Chemistry |
| JJX – Quality Control material | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR § 862.16 | 75- Chemistry |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in venous, arterial and fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and forearm. It is intended for testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) and is intended for multiple-patient use in a professional healthcare setting as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control program. This system should only be used with single-use, auto-disabling lancets. The Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes, and it is not intended for use on neonates. Alternative site testing on the forearm should be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions.
Nova One Blood Glucose Test Strips are for use with the Nova One Blood Glucose Monitors for quantitatively measuring glucose in venous, arterial and fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and forearm.
Nova Max Control Solutions are intended for use with the Nova Max, Nova Max One and Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results. There are three levels of controls, (Levels 1, 2, 3).
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
- For prescription use and OTC use.
- Not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus.
- Not intended for use on neonates.
- For in vitro diagnostic use only.
- Not for use on patients who are dehydrated, hypotensive, in shock, or for individuals in hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state, with or without ketosis.
- The performance of this system has not been evaluated on the critically ill.
- Alternative site testing should not be used for calibrating continuous glucose monitors, nor for insulin dosing calculations
4. Special instrument requirements:
Nova One Blood Glucose Monitor
{2}
3
I. Device Description:
The Nova One Glucose Monitoring System Kit contains the following:
- Nova One Blood Glucose Monitor
- 10 Nova One Test Strips
- Battery (3V Cell)
- Nova One Blood Glucose Monitor Quick Reference Guide
- Nova One Blood Glucose Monitor Owner's Guide
- Nova One Log Book
- 5 Nova Safety Lancet, 28g (Single Use Disposable Lancing Device)
- Nova Max Glucose Control Solution, Level 2
- Warranty Card
- Day Case
Offered separately:
- Nova Max Glucose Control Solutions: Level 1, 2 and 3
- 50 Nova One Test Strips (2 vials of 25)
- Nova Safety Lancets, 28g, Qty 4000
- Nova Safety Lancets, 23g, Qty 4000
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Nova Max One Blood Glucose Monitoring System
2. Predicate K number(s):
k112638
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Item | Candidate device
Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring System | Predicate device
Nova Max One Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k112638) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | Same | For the measurement of glucose in whole blood. |
| | Prescription use | Over-the-counter use (OTC) |
{3}
| | Multiple patient professional use | Single patient home use |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Capillary whole blood samples from fingertip and forearm
Venous or arterial whole blood samples (lithium or sodium heparin tubes) | Capillary whole blood samples from fingertip and forearm |
| Meter | Identical meter under new trade name Nova One | Nova Max One |
| Strips | Identical strips under new trade name Nova One | Nova Max One |
| Control solutions | Same | Nova Max Glucose Control Solutions Level 1, 2 and 3 |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
IEC 60601: Medical electrical equipment-Part 1-2: general requirements for safety-collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility.
EN55011: Limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance characteristics of industrial, scientific, and medical RF equipment, 1, B
IEC61010: Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and laboratory use-part 1: General requirements
# L. Test Principle:
The Nova One Glucose Monitor measures glucose electrochemically. The glucose biosensor is capable of recognizing the glucose present in whole blood or control solutions by virtue of the glucose specificity of the enzyme glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) present on the glucose test strip. The electrons liberated by this reaction are transferred via a co-factor and mediator (FAD) to the meter where they are read as a small electrical current. The current is integrated over the analysis time to generate charge which is directly proportional to the level of the glucose in the applied sample.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
{4}
The meter, strips and control solutions are identical to those cleared under k112638. The sponsor uses the same analytical claim for the current test system and refers to the predicate 510 (k) for the respective studies.
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Same as established in k112638.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The measuring range of the device is 20-600 mg/dL based on studies conducted in k112638.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
Traceable to NIST SRM 91, dry D-glucose.
Value assignment:
The control solutions are previously cleared under k112638.
Stability:
As established in k112638. The sponsor claims a closed-vial (shelf life) of 24 months when strips are stored at 15 to 30 °C and open-vial stability of 90 days when strips are stored at 15 to 30 °C.
This information is provided in the labeling of the test strips and control materials.
d. Detection limit:
See Linearity/assay reportable range above in b.
e. Analytical specificity:
As established in k112638. The sponsor has provided the following statements in the labeling:
- Cholesterol up to 500 mg/dL or triglyceride up to 750 mg/dL do not significantly affect results.
- Therapeutic levels of n-acetylcysteine and elevated uric acid may affect results.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
{5}
6
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with reference method (YSI):
The system accuracy on finger stick samples was evaluated in the predicate k112638.
To evaluate system accuracy on venous and arterial samples, healthcare professionals tested three lots of Nova One test strips on a total of 160 venous and arterial samples collected in Lithium Heparin tubes. Among the samples tested, 10 of the 29 arterial samples and 6 of 23 venous samples were spiked to ensure adequate coverage of the high reportable range.
The distribution of the sample glucose concentrations is specified in the table below.
Sample description:
| Glucose Concentration (mg/dL) | Number of samples | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Arterial Blood | Venous Blood |
| < 50 | 11 | 6 |
| 50 - 80 | 33 | 26 |
| 81 - 120 | 36 | 50 |
| 121 - 200 | 37 | 39 |
| 201 - 300 | 14 | 16 |
| 301 - 400 | 13 | 13 |
| > 400 | 16 | 10 |
| Total | 160 | 160 |
ISO 15197 Acceptance Criteria:
95% of individual glucose results shall fall within ±15mg/dL of reference method at glucose concentrations < 75mg/dL and within ±20% at glucose concentrations ≥ 75mg/dL.
Result Summary:
Arterial Blood Glucose < 75 mg/dL (34 samples)
| Number of test results | Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 26/34 (76.5%) | 32/34(94.1%) | 34/34 (100.0%) |
| Lot 2 | 27/34 (79.4%) | 34/34 (100.0%) | 34/34 (100.0%) |
| Lot 3 | 23/34 (67.6%) | 34/34 (100.0%) | 34/34 (100.0%) |
Arterial Glucose ≥ 75 mg/dL (126 Samples)
{6}
7
| Number of test results | Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 76/126 (60.3%) | 116/126 (92.1%) | 122/126 (96.8%) | 125/126 (99.2%) |
| Lot 2 | 81/126 (64.3%) | 115/126 (91.3%) | 120 of 126 (95.2%) | 126/126 (100.0%) |
| Lot 3 | 80/126 (63.5%) | 114/126 (90.5%) | 121/126 (96.0%) | 125/126 (99.2%) |
Venous Blood Glucose < 75 mg/dL (24 samples)
| Number of test results | Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 19/24 (79.2%) | 23/24 (95.8) | 24/24 (100.0%) |
| Lot 2 | 21/24 (87.5%) | 24/24 (100.0%) | 24/24 (100.0%) |
| Lot 3 | 15/24 (62.5%) | 23/24 (95.8) | 24/24 (100.0%) |
Venous Glucose ≥ 75 mg/dL (136 Samples)
| Number of test results | Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 95/136 (69.9%) | 134/136 (98.5%) | 136/136 (100%) | 136/136 (100%) |
| Lot 2 | 91/136 (66.9%) | 126/136 (92.6%) | 135/136 (99.3%) | 136/136 (100%) |
| Lot 3 | 94/136 (69.1%) | 129/136 (94.9%) | 134/136 (98.5%) | 136/136 (100%) |
Regression analysis- Nova one versus YSI
| Venous Samples | Correlation | Slope | Intercept |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Strip Lot 1 | 0.9976 | 1.005 | 0.549 |
| Strip Lot 2 | 0.9969 | 0.990 | 2.484 |
| Strip Lot 3 | 0.9974 | 0.993 | 0.843 |
| Arterial Samples | | | |
| Strip Lot 1 | 0.9976 | 1.017 | -0.674 |
| Strip Lot 2 | 0.9966 | 1.015 | -0.932 |
| Strip Lot 3 | 0.9967 | 1.000 | 0.988 |
Conclusion:
The performance of the Nova One glucose meter with Nova One reagent strip on venous and arterial samples meets ISO 15197 accuracy requirement of more than 95% results within the acceptance limits of ±15mg/dL or ±20%.
{7}
b. Matrix comparison:
Venous blood samples (N=60) is drawn into Sodium Heparin tubes. Each sample was measured in singlet using 2 Nova One monitors and 3 lots of strips. To obtain samples in the extreme low and high glucose concentration range, 5 native samples were subjected to glycolysis to obtain low glucose results and 5 samples were spiked to obtain high glucose results. The reference glucose concentration was determined using the YSI method. The results are summarized below.
ISO 15197 - Sodium Heparin Sample Distribution Breakdown
| Glucose Concentration mg/dL | Recommended Percentage per ISO15197 | Blood Samples | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Number of samples in study | Percentage of samples in study |
| < 50 | 5% | 5 | 8.3 |
| 51 to 80 | 10% | 11 | 18.3 |
| 81 to 120 | 20% | 16 | 26.7 |
| 121 to 200 | 30% | 12 | 20.0 |
| 201 to 300 | 20% | 7 | 11.7 |
| 301 to 400 | 10% | 6 | 10.0 |
| > 400 | 5% | 3 | 5.0 |
ISO 15197 - Nova One versus YSI, Glucose less than 75 mg/dl
| Within ± 5 mg/dl | Within ± 10 mg/dl | Within ± 15 mg/dl |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70/78 (89.7%) | 78/78 (100%) | 78/78 (100%) |
ISO 15197 - Nova One versus YSI, Glucose greater than 75 mg/dl
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 230/282 (81.6%) | 279/282 (98.9%) | 282/282 (100%) | 282/282 (100%) |
Linear Regression, Nova One versus YSI
| Test Strip Lot # | N | Slope | Intercept | Correlation R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 120 | 0.988 | 1.006 | 0.997 |
| 2 | 120 | 0.998 | 0.255 | 0.996 |
| 3 | 120 | 0.991 | 0.672 | 0.996 |
| Pooled Data | 360 | 0.992 | 0.644 | 0.997 |
Conclusion:
Based on the result, the sponsor concluded that the sodium heparin blood glucose results met the ISO 15197 Acceptance Criteria, indicating that the
{8}
Nova One Blood Glucose Monitoring System can be utilized to measure blood glucose values accurately when blood samples are collected in sodium heparin anticoagulant blood collection tubes..
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable)
A lay user study on finger stick samples was evaluated in the predicate k112638.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
In the labeling the sponsor provides the following expected values and reference citation:
The normal fasting adult blood glucose value for a person without diabetes is <100 mg/dL. One to two hours after meals normal blood glucose levels should be less than 140 mg/dL.
Reference: American Diabetes Association, Clinical Practice Recommendations. (2012). Diabetes Care, Vol 35, Supplement 1, p S11-S63.
N. Instrument Name:
Nova One Blood Glucose Monitor
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for additional readings.
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer,
9
{9}
webserver, or mobile device?
Yes _______ or No ☐ X
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
Yes _______ or No ☐ X
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No _______
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The glucose test is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger and forearm, as well as venous and arterial whole blood collected in sodium or lithium heparin tubes. The whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip by capillary action.
5. Calibration:
Calibration is performed by the manufacturer and does not need to be performed by the end user. The meter does not require coding.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor has three levels of control solutions (level 2 control solution is included with the kit). When a test strip is inserted into the meter, each control can be measured by following the instructions for “Running Control Solution” provided in the user’s manual. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label. If the test results fall outside the range printed on the test strip vial, the user is instructed to contact Customer Service (available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week).
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The “Performance Characteristics” Section above:
- Infection control
10
{10}
The current meter is identical to the predicate meter previously cleared in k112638. Disinfection efficacy studies (viral efficacy studies) were performed and reviewed in the predicate 510(k). Specifically, Clorox Germicidal Wipes (EPA registration #67619-12) were validated demonstrating complete inactivation of live virus.
New robustness study was performed in this submission to support more extensive cleaning and disinfecting cycles in the professional multiple-patient use settings. The sponsor demonstrated that there was no change in the performance or the external materials of the meters after 10950 cleaning and disinfection cycles designed to simulate 70 cycles/week over 3 years professional multiple-patient use. Labeling has been reviewed for adequate instructions in validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
- Temperature and humidity operating conditions
The sponsor claims operating temperature from 57°F-104°F (14-40°C) and relative humidity range from 10% to 93% including extreme combinations of temperature and humidity as established in k112638.
- EMC testing
EMC testing was evaluated and certified by The Compliance Management Group. A test certificate was issued to Nova on June 28, 2012.
- Altitude Study
The sponsor claims that an altitude up to 10,000 feet does not affect the test results of the proposed device as established in k112638.
- Hematocrit study
The sponsor claims a hematocrit range of 25 to 65% as established in k112638.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.