DIAZYME 25-HYDROXY VITAMIN D EIA KIT DIAZYME 25-HYDROXY VITAMIN D EIA CONTROL SET DIA
Applicant
Diazyme Laboratories
Product Code
MRG · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Nov 28, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1825
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K122420 · Nov 28, 2012
DIAZYME 25-HYDROXY VITAMIN D EIA KIT DIAZYME 25-HYDROXY VITAMIN D EIA CONTROL SET DIA
Diazyme Laboratories
Certified commercial donor samples; FDA Licensed Donor Center samples; IRB-approved clinical sample collections
The sponsor used a cohort of 157 healthy individuals from three U.S. geographical regions to establish the reference range for the 25-OH Vitamin D EIA assay.
Retrospective analysis of healthy donor samples; Study Period: October and November (fall season)
157 apparently healthy individuals (ages 21-80) from three U.S. regions (PA, TN, TX); Sample Size: 157; Number of Sites: 3
Not applicable for this study
Establishment of 25-OH Vitamin D reference range (2.5th to 97.5th percentile)
Indications for Use
The Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D EIA is designed for the quantification of total 25-OH Vitamin D in human serum and plasma. The assay results are to be used in parallel with other clinical data to assess the Vitamin D status of a patient. For in vitro diagnostic use only. The 25-OH Vitamin D EIA Control Kit is intended for use as quality controls for the Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D EIA Kit only. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
Device Story
The Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D EIA is an enzyme immunoassay for quantifying total 25-OH Vitamin D in human serum and plasma. The process involves extracting Vitamin D from samples using reagent EX, followed by a competitive immunoassay on a microplate coated with a 25-OH Vitamin D derivative. Patient samples compete with the coated derivative for binding to a sheep monoclonal antibody (Reagent 1). After incubation and washing, an HRP-labeled secondary antibody (Reagent 2) is added, followed by a TMB substrate (Reagent 3). The reaction is stopped with HCl, and absorbance is measured at 450 nm. The concentration of 25-OH Vitamin D is inversely proportional to the measured absorbance. The assay is performed in a laboratory setting by trained personnel using a microplate reader. Results assist clinicians in assessing a patient's Vitamin D status, aiding in the diagnosis and management of Vitamin D-related conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (n=80 per sample, total CV 4.9-17.6%). Linearity confirmed 8.3-143.6 ng/mL (y=1.005x + 1.1674). LoB 3.0 ng/mL, LoD 5.6 ng/mL, LoQ 8.3 ng/mL. Interference and cross-reactivity studies performed. Method comparison with predicate (n=58) showed good agreement. Reference range established using 157 healthy individuals (median 29.1 ng/mL).
Indicated for the quantification of total 25-OH Vitamin D in human serum and plasma to assess Vitamin D status in patients, used in conjunction with other clinical data. For in vitro diagnostic use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vitamin D test system is a device intended for use in clinical laboratories for the quantitative determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) and other hydroxylated metabolites of vitamin D in serum or plasma to be used in the assessment of vitamin D sufficiency.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Vitamin D test systems must comply with the following special controls:(1) Labeling in conformance with 21 CFR 809.10 and
(2) Compliance with existing standards of the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Predicate Devices
IDS 25-OH Vitamin D EIA (k021163)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k122420
B. Purpose for Submission:
New assay
C. Measurand:
25-Hydroxy-vitamin D
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, competitive enzyme immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Diazyme Laboratories
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
25-OH Vitamin D EIA Kit
25-OH Vitamin D EIA Control Kit
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MRG | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1825
Vitamin D Test System | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| JJX | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR 862.1660
Quality Control Material | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indication(s) for use below.
{1}
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D EIA is designed for the quantification of total 25-OH Vitamin D in human serum and plasma. The assay results are to be used in parallel with other clinical data to assess the Vitamin D status of a patient. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The 25-OH Vitamin D EIA Control Kit is intended for use as quality controls for the Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D EIA Kit only. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
96-well microplate reader that reads at 450 nm.
I. Device Description:
25-OH Vitamin D EIA Kit
The device is a ready-to-use, six-reagent kit. Including an Extraction Solution (EX), Wash buffer (Wash 20X), and STOP solution (HCl). Reagent 1 is PBS containing sheep monoclonal antibody to 25-OH Vitamin D, stabilizers and preservatives. Reagent 2 contains PBS containing anti-sheep IgG linked to HRP, stabilizers and preservatives. Reagent 3 contains a proprietary aqueous formulation of tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and hydrogen peroxide. A 96-well microplate strip coated with a 25 OH-D derivative is included in the kit. The kit contains six levels of ready-to-use calibrator material from human serum supplied in aliquots of 1.0 mL (6x1 mL vials are provided per kit).
25-OH Vitamin D EIA Control Kit
Two levels of ready-to-use control material (26.0 and 52.3 ng/mL) are provided in the kit. Controls are manufactured from human serum and contains sodium azide (<0.1%), supplied in aliquots of 1.0 mL (2x1 mL vials are provided with the kit).
Calibrators and controls contain human source material were tested by FDA-approved methods and found negative for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antibody (HIV I/II Ab), Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), and Hepatitis C Virus Antibody (HCV).
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
2
{2}
1. Predicate device name(s):
IDS 25-OH Vitamin D EIA
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k021163
3. Comparison with predicate:
Similarities and differences:
| | IDS 25-OH Vitamin D EIA Predicate (k021163) | Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D EIA |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) and other hydroxylated metabolites in human serum or plasma. | Same |
| Type of test | Quantitative | Same |
| Method | 96-well microplate | Same |
| Specimen type | Human serum or plasma. | Same |
| Measuring range | 2.4 – 144 ng/mL | 8.3 – 143.6 ng/mL |
| Calibrator | Serum based, liquid stable ready to use, 6 levels | Same |
| Control | Serum based, liquid stable ready to use, 2 levels | Same |
{3}
4
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2 Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Devices
CLSI EP6-A Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Methods
CLSI EP7-A2 Inference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
CLSI EP17-A Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantification; Approved Guideline
L. Test Principle:
Assay is based on the competition (for a 25-OH Vitamin D antibody) between a 25-OH Vitamin D conjugate coated on a microplate and the 25-OH Vitamin D content of a serum sample. Following kit instructions, Vitamin D is extracted using reagent EX and deep-well pre-dilution strips. The extracted Vitamin D samples are transferred to the coated microplate. Reagent R1 containing the 25-OH Vitamin d antibody is added to the microplate. After an incubation and a wash step, R2 containing the HRP-labeled secondary antibody is added to the microplate. Next is a second incubation followed by the addition of R3 containing the TMB substrate. After a final incubation the reaction is stopped using the STOP solution and the colorimetric signal is read. The 25-OH Vitamin D concentration of a patient sample is inversely proportional to the measured absorbance at 450 nm. Assay time is 2 hours.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
Performance was tested using a Dynex automated microplate reader.
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The sponsor performed precision studies in accordance with the CLSI EP5-A2 guideline. Over 20 days, 10 precision levels including 2 serum based control samples (26.0 ng/mL and 52.3 ng/mL vitamin D) and 8 serum samples from 10.5 ng/mL to 116.2 ng/mL vitamin D were measured daily. Each sample was run in replicates of 2 per run, 2 runs per day for a total of 80 results per sample. Precision results are summarized in the table below:
| Specimen | n | Concentration (ng/mL) | Within-run SD (ng/mL) | Within-run CV (%) | Total SD (ng/mL) | Total CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Control #1 | 80 | 26.0 | 0.97 | 3.7 | 1.55 | 6.0 |
| Control #2 | 80 | 52.3 | 1.43 | 2.7 | 3.93 | 7.5 |
| Low | 80 | 10.5 | 1.39 | 13.3 | 1.84 | 17.6 |
{4}
| sample #1 | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low sample #2 | 80 | 12.7 | 1.14 | 9.0 | 2.04 | 16.0 |
| Sample #1 | 80 | 23.3 | 1.65 | 7.1 | 1.89 | 8.1 |
| Sample #2 | 80 | 40.0 | 3.70 | 9.2 | 3.75 | 9.4 |
| Sample #3 | 80 | 52.8 | 1.18 | 2.2 | 4.03 | 7.6 |
| Sample #4 | 80 | 69.3 | 1.94 | 2.8 | 6.03 | 8.7 |
| Sample #5 | 80 | 84.1 | 4.69 | 5.6 | 6.33 | 7.5 |
| Sample #6 | 80 | 101.4 | 4.65 | 4.6 | 5.68 | 5.6 |
| Sample #7 | 80 | 116.8 | 4.89 | 4.2 | 5.77 | 4.9 |
| Sample #8 | 80 | 116.2 | 2.98 | 2.6 | 6.43 | 5.5 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The claimed linearity range of this device is 8.3 ng/mL to 143.6 ng/mL.
The sponsor performed a linearity study in accordance with the CLSI EP6-A guideline using one lot of calibrator and one lot of reagent. Eleven levels of serum based samples (5.0, 12.03, 19.06, 33.12, 47.18, 61.24, 75.3, 89.36, 103.42, 117.48, 145.6 ng/mL) were prepared by diluting a high serum sample containing 145.6 ng/mL of 25-OH Vitamin D. Samples were measured in triplicate. The assay was linear between 6.7 ng/mL and 143.6 ng/mL. The results between the expected concentrations and the measured concentrations yielded a linear regression of y=1.005x + 1.1674.
Based on the results of the LoQ and linearity studies, the sponsor’s claimed measuring range is 8.3 ng/mL to 143.6 ng/mL.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability
The master calibrator batch stock was prepared in house gravimetrically in DMSO. The alue assignment of the stock is made by UV absorbance spectrometry calibrated with NIST SRM 935a, based on NIST recommended molar extinction coefficients. The DMSO stock of 25-OH Vitamin D3 was used to make calibration levels by dilution into pooled human serum.
Value assignments
Normal (higher than 30 ng/mL) and Abnormal (lower than 29.9 ng/mL) 25-OH Vitamin D controls prepared in human serum were tested with released Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D kits in 120 replicates, obtained from 5 independent runs, on 2 automatic analyzers. The obtained mean values were assigned as control target values. The controls target ranges were assigned as mean ± 25% (ng/mL).
Calibrator value assignments are based on an internal procedure. The initial value
{5}
assignment for calibrators was performed using the predicate assay. Subsequent patient samples were tested against the predicate assay and the final calibrator values were adjusted and verified.
## Stability
Stability study was based on accelerated study and real-time stability study is ongoing. Stability study protocol and acceptance criteria has been provided and found to be adequate. The kit is stable until the expiration date if stored at 2-8 °C. Calibrators, controls, and the 25-D Biotin solution are stable for 8 weeks at 2-8 °C. If opened, the unused antibody coated microplate is stable for 8 weeks at 2-8 °C only if returned to the foil pouch and sealed. The 20X wash solution is stable at room temperature for 8 weeks and the 1X working wash solution is stable at room temperature for 4 weeks.
## d. Detection limit:
A detection limits study was performed by the sponsor based on the CLSI EP17-A guideline. To determine the LoB, serum containing undetectable levels of 25-OH Vitamin D from a commercial source was assayed in three independent runs with 20 replicates per run (N=60). The LoB was calculated as the mean 57th and 58th highest values for the blanks. LoB is determined to be 3.0 ng/mL
To determine the LoD five low Vitamin D serum samples were measured in three independent runs, with four replicates per run (N=60). The LoD is defined as LoD = LoB + (1.645 * STDEV of Low samples). LoD is determined to be 5.6 ng/mL.
The LoQ was measured using five samples (6.7, 12.4, 18.3, 22.3, 28.8 ng/mL). Each sample was assayed in 40 replicates obtained in five independent runs. LoQ is defined as the lowest concentration for which %CV is <20%. A curve fit was used to obtain an estimate of %CV as a function of mean. LoQ was determined to be 8.3 ng/mL.
The sponsor's claimed measuring range is 8.3 to 143.4 ng/mL.
## e. Analytical specificity:
Interference study:
An interference study was performed by the sponsor to evaluate different potential interference substances. Two unaltered serum samples (one deficient and one normal) were used for the testing. One aliquot of the samples were spiked with 5 concentrations of potential interfering substances and an aliquot of unspiked samples were used as a control. All samples were tested in duplicates. The sponsor defined non-significant interference as within ±10% difference between the spiked and unspiked samples.
6
{6}
The interference substances examined and their concentrations tested are listed in the following tables:
| Interference Substances | Concentration tested | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 |
| Ascorbic acid (mM) | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 |
| Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 |
| Bilirubin Conjugated (mg/dL) | 0.0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 |
| Hemoglobin (mg/dL) | 0.0 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 |
| Interference Substances | Concentration tested | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 0.0 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 |
| | | 450 | 500 | 750 | 1000 |
Following is the list of interference substances tested with the highest concentrations of interference substances that did not have a significant interference with the assay.
| Conjugated bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Free bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 500 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic acid | 10 mM |
| Triglycerides | 450 mg/dL |
The sponsor states the following in their labeling: "Do not use hemolysed samples."
## Cross-reactivity study:
To test for cross-reactivity with potential cross-reactants, six identical serum aliquots (10 mL) were each spiked with one of the cross-reactant listed below. Cross-reactants stock solutions were made with 100% DMSO. A seventh serum aliquot of 10 mL was spiked with 100% DMSO (devoid of Vitamin D) and served as a negative control. All 7 spiked sera were then quantified in quadruplicates. % Cross-reactivity was calculated using the following the equation:
$$
\% \text{Cross-reactivity} = \frac{\text{spiked sample} - \text{unspiked sample}}{\text{conc. of cross reactants spiked}} \times 100
$$
{7}
The following were tested and results were summarized in the table below:
| Cross-reactant | Unspiked Vitamin D (ng/mL) | Spiked Vitamin D (ng/mL) | % Cross-reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25-OH Vitamin D3 (tested at 63 ng/ml) | 24.4 | 87.4 | 100.0% |
| 25-OH Vitamin D2 (tested at 63 ng/ml) | 24.4 | 85.4 | 96.8% |
| Vitamin D3 (tested at 63 ng/ml) | 24.4 | 24.2 | -0.3% |
| Vitamin D2 (tested at 63 ng/ml) | 24.4 | 22.3 | -3.3% |
| 1,25-OH Vitamin D3 (tested at 63 ng/ml) | 24.4 | 84.1 | 94.8% |
| 1,25-OH Vitamin D2 (tested at 63 ng/ml) | 24.4 | 62.0 | 59.7% |
| 24R,25-OH Vitamin D3 (tested at 56 ng/mL) | 9.8 | 23.2 | 23.9% |
| 3-epi-25-OH Vitamin D3 (tested at 57 ng/ml) | 21.2 | 69.6 | 84.9% |
| 3-epi-25-OH Vitamin D2 (tested at 57 ng/ml) | 21.2 | 59.9 | 67.9% |
f. Assay cut-off:
N/A
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A method comparison study was performed using the candidate device (Diazyme 25-OH vitamin D EIA) and the predicate device. The obtained results from the candidate device were compared to those of the predicate device. 58 serum samples were tested with seven spiked samples to cover the high end measuring range. The samples range tested was from 11.9 to $131.5\mathrm{ng / mL}$ . Deming regression yielded the following results.
Slope $= 0.9341$ (CI: 0.906 to 1.045), y-intercept $= +1.448$ (CI: -3.83 to 3.7), $\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.930$ (CI: 0.940 to 0.979)
b. Matrix comparison:
{8}
The sponsor performed a matrix comparison study using 66 matched sets of serum (ng/mL), Li-heparin (ng/mL), and K₃-EDTA (ng/mL) to evaluate the effect of the anticoagulants on the Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D EIA kit results. The reported values for each sample and for each matrix were obtained from single measurements. The total number of matched sets tested was 66. Seven spiked patient samples were included in the study to cover the hard-to-find samples range. The linear regression results yielded the following comparisons results for each matrix.
- Li-Heparin vs. Serum: $y = 0.993x + 1.855$ (sample range tested was 10.9 to 130.2 ng/dL) and $r^2 = 0.961$.
- K₃-EDTA vs. Serum: $y = 1.006x + 2.901$ (sample range tested was 8.3 to 119.5 ng/dL) and $r^2 = 0.967$.
The sponsor demonstrated lithium heparin plasma and K3 EDTA plasma are acceptable anticoagulants to be used with their assay.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
N/A
b. Clinical specificity:
N/A
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
N/A
4. Clinical cut-off:
N/A
5. Expected values/Reference range:
To determine a reference range for the Diazyme 25-OH Vitamin D EIA, the 25-OH Vitamin D serum concentrations of a U.S. population of 157 apparently healthy individuals (age between 21 and 80 years old), were measured with the Diazyme method. These samples were collected from three different geographical locations, with 47 samples collected from Pennsylvania (Northern U.S.), 56 samples collected from Tennessee (Central US) and 54 samples collected from Texas (Southern US). The study population consisted of 72 light skin individuals (46%) and 85 dark skin individuals (54%). There was no family history of parathyroid or calcium regulatory disease. There was no participant history of kidney disease, GI disease, liver disease, calcium-levels related disease, thyroid disease, parathyroid disease, calcium related disease, seizures,
9
{9}
chronic disease, or bariatric surgery. No participants were taking medication known to affect absorption or catabolism of Vitamin D. All serum samples were collected during the fall season (October 2010-November 2010).
The following results were obtained:
Lowest 25-OH Vitamin D concentration: 8.4 ng/mL
Highest 25-OH Vitamin D concentration: 61.3 ng/mL
Median 25-OH Vitamin D concentration: 29.1 ng/mL
Observed range (2.5th to 97.5th percentile): 12.0 to 55.0 ng/mL
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.