K122367 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · OMZ · Nov 2, 2012 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K122367
Device Name
BARD PTV DILATATION CATHETER
Applicant
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
OMZ · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Nov 2, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1250
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Bard PTV Dilatation Catheters are recommended for Percutaneous Transluminal Valvuloplasty (PTV) of the pulmonary valve. - A patient with isolated pulmonary stenosis - A patient with valvular pulmonary stenosis with other minor congenital heart disease that does not require surgical intervention.
Device Story
Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter is an over-the-wire, high-performance balloon catheter for pulmonary valvuloplasty. Device features a proprietary noncompliant, low-profile balloon fixed at the distal tip, designed for consistent diameters/lengths at high pressures. Two radiopaque markers delineate working length for placement; coaxial catheter includes an atraumatic tip. Compatible with 0.035" guidewires; available in 75 and 100 cm lengths. Operated by physicians in clinical settings. Inflation/deflation via proximal luer lock hubs. Device facilitates valve dilation to treat pulmonary stenosis; benefits include improved valve function without surgical intervention.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated via in vitro testing including catheter shaft length, inflation/deflation times, trackability, tip tensile strength, joint tensile strength, balloon burst pressure, fatigue, and distensibility. Results demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Over-the-wire balloon catheter; noncompliant balloon; radiopaque markers; coaxial design; 0.035" guidewire compatibility. Materials and sterilization methods are equivalent to predicate Atlas® PTA catheter. Complies with ISO 10555-1 for tip tensile strength. Dimensions: 12-26mm diameter, 2-6cm length, 75-100cm shaft length.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with isolated pulmonary stenosis or valvular pulmonary stenosis with minor congenital heart disease not requiring surgery, undergoing Percutaneous Transluminal Valvuloplasty (PTV).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K122367
#### Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter 2 2012 NOV 510(k) Summary 21 CFR 807.92
As required by the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, coded under Section 513, Part (I)(3)(A) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, a 510(k) summary upon which substantial equivalence determination is based is as follows:
#### Submitter Information:
| Applicant: | Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc<br>1625 West 3rd Street<br>Tempe, Arizona 85281 |
|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Phone: 480-379-2841
Fax: 480-449-2546
Contact: Erin Fox, Regulatory Affairs Specialist II
August 1, 2012 Date
# Subject Device Name:
| Device Trade Name: | Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Pulmonary (Pulmonic) Valvuloplasty<br>Catheters/Percutaneous Valvuloplasty<br>Catheter (21 CFR 870.1250, Product Code<br>OMZ) |
| Classification: | Class II |
Classification Panel: Cardiovascular
#### Predicate Devices:
- Mullins-X PTV Catheter (K102473; cleared December 9, 2010) .
- Atlas® PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (K120971, cleared April 19, 2012) .
Image /page/0/Picture/18 description: The image shows the word "BARD" in a stylized, blocky font. The letters are outlined in black, giving them a bold and distinct appearance. The font style is geometric and somewhat angular, making the word visually striking.
{1}------------------------------------------------
### Device Description:
(T.tre Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter is a high performance balloon catheter consisting of an over the wire catheter with a balloon fixed at the distal tip. The proprietary noncompliant, low profile balloon is designed to provide consistent balloon diameters and lengths even at high pressures. Two radiopaque markers delineate the working length of the balloon and aid in balloon placement. The coaxial catheter includes an atraumatic tip to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the valve. The over the wire catheter is compatible with 0.035" guidewire and is available in 75 and 100 cm working lengths. The proximal portion of the catheter includes a female luer lock hub connected to the inflation lumen, and a female luer-lock hub connected to the guidewire lumen.
| Attribute | Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter<br>Product Offering |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Balloon Diameter<br>(mm) | 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 |
| Balloon Length<br>(cm) | 2, 4, 6 |
| Catheter Shaft<br>Lengths (cm) | 75, 100 |
| Introducer Sheath<br>Compatibility<br>(compatible<br>balloon sizes,<br>diameter (mm) x<br>length (cm)) | 7F: (12x 2,4,6; 14x 2,4)<br>8F: (14x 6; 16x 2,4,6; 18x 2,4)<br>9F: (18x 6; 20x 2,4)<br>10F: (22x 2,4; 24x 2,4)<br>12F: (26x 2,4) |
## Indications for Use of Device:
The Bard PTV Dilatation Catheters are recommended for Percutaneous Transluminal Valvuloplasty (PTV) of the pulmonary valve.
- . A patient with isolated pulmonary stenosis
- A patient with valvular pulmonary stenosis with other minor congenital heart . disease that does not require surgical intervention.
Image /page/1/Picture/10 description: The image shows the word "BARD" in a stylized, blocky font. The letters are outlined in black, giving them a bold and distinct appearance. The overall design is simple yet eye-catching, with a focus on readability and a modern aesthetic.
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### Comparison of Indications for Use to Predicate Devices:
The indication for use statement for the Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter does not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness as demonstrated through the risk analysis process based on the proposed indications for use statement as compared to the predicate devices. Therefore, the subject device, the Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter, is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
#### Technological Comparison to Predicate Devices:
The Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter has the following similarities to the predicate devices:
- Same intended use (Mullins-X PTV Catheter) .
- Same indications for use (Mullins-X PTV Catheter) .
- Same target population (Mullins-X PTV Catheter) .
- Same fundamental scientific technology (both predicates) .
- Same operating principle (both predicates) .
- . Same packaging materials and configuration (Atlas® PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter)
- . Same sterility assurance level and method of sterilization (Atlas® PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter)
#### Performance Data:
To demonstrate substantial equivalence of the subject device, the Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter, to the predicate devices, the technological characteristics and performance criterion were evaluated. Using FDA Guidance Documents on non-clinical testing of medical devices and internal Risk Assessment procedures, the following in vitro tests were performed on the subject device:
- . Catheter Shaft Length
- Inflation Time .
- Simulated Use Deflation Time .
- Removal Deflation Time .
- Trackability .
The following in vitro tests were leveraged from the predicate device, the Atlas® PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Image /page/2/Picture/22 description: The image shows the word "BARD" in a bold, sans-serif font. The letters are all capitalized and appear to be outlined. The font style gives the word a modern and somewhat geometric appearance.
{3}------------------------------------------------
- Tip Length .
Balloon Outer Diameter .
- Balloon Working Length .
- Catheter Shaft Outer Diameter .
- Catheter Shaft Inner Diameter .
- Tip Visibility .
- . Catheter Shaft Visibility
- . Marker Band Visibility
- Tip Morphology .
- Tip Tensile .
- Joint Tensile .
- Catheter Elongation .
- Nominal (Operating) Pressure .
- Rated Burst Pressure .
- Balloon Burst Mode .
- Fatigue .
- Catheter Shaft Leaks .
- Catheter Shaft Burst .
- Balloon Distensibility .
- Marker Band Alignment .
- Sheath Compatibility t
- Equipment Interface .
- Media Interaction .
- Pouch Tensile Strength .
The results from these tests demonstrate that the technological characteristics and performance criteria of the Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and that it can perform in a manner equivalent to devices currently on the market for the similar intended use. The following table provides a detailed summary of performance testing completed on the subject device, as compared to the corresponding performance testing completed on the predicate Mullins-X PTV Catheter.
Image /page/3/Picture/28 description: The image shows the word "BARD" in a stylized, outlined font. The letters are bold and connected, giving the word a solid, block-like appearance. The overall design is simple and eye-catching.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 97
Traditional 510(k)
Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter
Summary of Performance Testing
.
| Predicate<br>Mullins-X Test | Predicate Mullins-X<br>Acceptance Criteria | Test<br>Performed<br>on Subject<br>Device? | Subject Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter<br>Acceptance Criteria | Test<br>Result |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
| Visual<br>Inspection | The catheters shall be free from<br>contamination, discoloration, and any<br>form of damage that could impact the<br>proper functioning of the device. | YES | Inspection of the device for damage is completed prior to<br>any testing for informational purposes. Contamination of the<br>device is covered in biocompatibility section 15.<br><br>During testing no abnormalities were observed, which was<br>confirmed through functional testing of the device (described<br>below). | PASS |
| Balloon<br>Preparation Test | Each catheter shall be prepped per<br>the procedure without functional<br>difficulties or anomalies. | YES | Media Interaction (as stated in Table 7)<br><br>The specification for the subject device states that the<br>catheter's guidewire lumen must be flushable with saline<br>utilizing a 10mL syringe or equivalent. Though worded<br>differently, the specification of the subject device is similar to<br>the Mullins-X predicate device, as they both ensure no<br>anomalies are noted during simulated use.<br><br>All results showed the subject device passed the specified<br>criteria. | PASS |
| Diameter and<br>Profile Test | The balloon diameter at rated burst<br>pressure shall be within +/- 10% of the<br>labeled balloon diameter and the<br>samples should fit through the<br>selected introducer with no problems. | YES | Balloon Outer Diameter (as stated in Table 7)<br><br>The specification for the subject device is +.04/-.03mm<br>across all diameters. When calculated for the smallest<br>balloon size (12mm) a +/- 10% change in labeled diameter<br>equates to +/-1.2mm.<br><br>All results showed the subject device passed the specified<br>criteria, which is more robust than the Mullins-X predicate<br>device criteria. | PASS |
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc
: .
BARD
{5}------------------------------------------------
aditional 510(k)
ard PTV Dilatation Cathe
Page 98
PASS PASS PASS PASS sults showed the subject device passed the specif
a, and no breaks were seen.
I Burst Pressure (as stated in Table 7) All results showed the subject device passed the spec
criteria, which is more robust than the Mullins-X predic
device criteria, because the labeled rated burst pressu
are hi esults showed the subject device passed the spe The specification for the subject device is ≤ 5% acro
iameters. .Il results showed the subject device passed the s
riteria which is more robust than the Mullins-X pre
evice criteria. specification for the subject device states that that the the states that the states that the states that the states of the states of the be
sure is greater than the Mullinspecification for the subject device states th
ter must be capable of withstanding 20 cyc
on to ≥ labeled rated burst pressure. ation and Deflation (as stated in Tab oon Distensibility (as stated in Ta tigue (as stated in Table criteria ્ટર્ટ ES ES ES e results must show statistically
in at least 95% confidence, at least and the more of the bearth and the more of the more of burnst pressure. results must demonstrate that
on diameter is within + k & Mithin + K BP
abeled diameter is within + K BP
not be significantly increased by and bed
easingly higher pressuress. tion achieved
ss than 12 seconds and def
eved in less than 20 second o breaks allowe Balloon inflation
Deflation
Test Balloon Minimur
Burst Strength Repeated
Balloon Inflation
(Balloon Fatigu
Test) Balloon
Distensibilit
BARI
Peripheral Vascular
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 99
Traditional 510(k)
Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter
...
← ←
:
:
| Balloon<br>Inflatability Test, | There should be no interference with<br>balloon deflation | YES | Deflation (as stated in Table 7) | PASS |
|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| | The balloon's ability to deflate is evaluated during deflation<br>testing as mentioned above. Any abnormalities during<br>testing are documented. | | | |
| | During testing no abnormalities during deflation were<br>observed and all samples were able to be fully deflated. | | | |
| Tip Pull.and.<br>Torque Test, | Must withstand at least 10 turns<br>without breaking | YES | Tip Tensile (as stated in Table 7) | PASS |
| | The tip specification for the subject device is different than<br>the Mullins-X predicate device in that it follows ISO10555-1;<br>specifically, the tip is tested for tensile strength. The tip<br>tensile specification for the subject device states that the<br>catheter must withstand a minimum tensile force of 2<br>pounds-force. | | | |
| | All results showed the subject device passed the specified<br>criteria from the ISO standard. | | | |
| Bond-Strength<br>Test | All bonds must withstand at least 3 lbs<br>of pull strength. | YES | Joint Tensile (as stated in Table 7) | PASS |
| | The bond strength specification for the subject device states<br>that the catheter must withstand a minimum tensile force of<br>5 pounds-force. | | | |
| | All results showed the subject device passed the specified<br>criteria, which is more robust than the Mullins-X predicate<br>device criteria. | | | |
| Catheter Body<br>Maximum<br>Pressure Test | All samples must withstand 30 ATM<br>(400psi). | YES | Catheter Shaft Leak and Catheter Shaft Burst (as stated<br>in Table 7) | PASS |
| | | | The highest rated burst pressure for Atlas Gold is 18atm,<br>and as a safety factor the proposed specification was set to<br>+5atm above the highest rated burst pressure (23atm<br>minimum). Though the value is less than the Mullins-X<br>specification, it is adequate for the labeled burst pressure of<br>the subject device. | |
| | | | All results showed the subject device passed the specified<br>criteria. | |
.
.. :
.
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc
. '
BARID
{7}------------------------------------------------
Traditional 510(k) Traditional 510(k)
Bard Prv Dilatation Cathete
。 2017/07/14
..
:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
:
: 上一
Page 100 :
. . . · . 19 .
1000 :
.
30000
. : 11:4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
រៀង ក្រុងប្រជាជាងមួយម៉ែត្រីជួរប៉ុន្តែព្រឹមពីមួយ Vascular, Inc
ﺮ ﺗﻢ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ
.
-
-
—
-
.
. .
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### Conclusions:
The subject device, the Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter, met all predetermined acceptance criteria of design verification and validation as specified by applicable standards, guidance, test protocols and/or customer inputs. The Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate devices, the Mullins-X PTV Catheter and the Atlas® PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter.
Image /page/8/Picture/5 description: The image shows the word "BARD" in a bold, sans-serif font. The letters are outlined in black, giving them a distinct and prominent appearance. The overall design is simple and clean, focusing on the clarity and readability of the word.
{9}------------------------------------------------
# DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room-WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
NOV 2 2012
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. c/o Ms. Erin Fox Regulatory Affairs Specialist C. R. Bard 1625 West Third Street Tempe, AZ 85281
Re: K122367
Trade/Device Name: Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Pulmonary Valvuloplasty Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OMZ Dated: August 2, 2012 Received: August 5, 2012
Dear Ms. Fox:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
{10}------------------------------------------------
# Page 2 - Ms. Erin Fox
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Aus Hille
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{11}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: Bard PTV Dilatation Catheter
Indications for Use: The Bard PTV Dilatation Catheters are recommended for Percutaneous Transluminal Valvuloplasty (PTV) of the pulmonary valve.
- A patient with isolated pulmonary stenosis .
- A patient with valvular pulmonary stenosis with other minor congenital heart . disease that does not require surgical intervention.
Prescription Use_X (Part21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Mskiel
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Cardiovascular Devices
510(k) Number K122367
Image /page/11/Picture/16 description: The image shows the word "BARD" in a bold, sans-serif font. The letters are outlined in black, and the interior of the letters is white. The letters are evenly spaced and appear to be in a slightly condensed style. The overall impression is a clean and modern design.
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.