The DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. It is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples (from finger). This system is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. It should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes, or testing on neonates.
Device Story
System consists of meter, test strips, and control solutions; uses electrochemical biosensor technology with glucose oxidase enzyme. Capillary action draws blood into test strip chamber; meter measures electrical current generated by glucose reaction; displays result in 7 seconds. Intended for single-patient home use; operated by patient. Provides quantitative glucose measurement (20-600 mg/dL) to assist in diabetes management. Includes memory for 450 tests and multi-day averaging. Meter requires no coding. Performance validated against YSI reference method; includes disinfection validation for multi-use safety.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; substantial equivalence based on bench testing and comparison of technological characteristics to predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical biosensor with carbon electrodes; glucose oxidase enzyme. Dimensions: 90x52x15 mm; weight: 45.6 g. Sample volume: 0.7 μL. Measurement range: 20-600 mg/dL. Connectivity: None. Standards: ISO 15197:2003, ISO 14971:2007, CLSI EP6-A, CLSI EP7-A2, IEC/EN 61010-1/2-101.
Indications for Use
Indicated for people with diabetes for home monitoring of glucose levels in fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertip. Not for diagnosis or screening of diabetes; not for neonatal use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
URIGHT TD-4254 Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K082482)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k122307
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Capillary whole blood glucose from the finger
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, amperometric assay, glucose oxidase
E. Applicant:
BioCare Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1345, Glucose test system
21 CFR 862.1660, Quality Control Material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II, Class I (Reserved)
3. Product code:
NBW, System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter
CGA, Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
JJX, Quality Control Material
{1}
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System
The DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. It is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples (from finger). This system is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. It should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes, or testing on neonates.
DIAVUE Blood Glucose Test Strips
The DIAVUE Blood Glucose Test Strips are to be used with the DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Meter; it measures glucose in capillary whole blood taken from a fingertip. It is for use outside of body (in vitro diagnostic use). It is intended for lay use by people with diabetes and should only be used by a single patient. This system should not be shared. They are not indicated for the diagnosis or screening of diabetes or for neonatal use.
DIAVUE Control Solutions
The DIAVUE Control Solutions are used with the DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Meter and DIAVUE Blood Glucose Test Strips to indicate appropriate user technique and to indicate that the test strip and meter are functioning properly.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Over the Counter use
Not for use on neonates
Not for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus
Not to be used for patients who are dehydrated, hypotensive, in shock, critically ill or in a hyperosmolar state
4. Special instrument requirements:
DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Meter
I. Device Description:
The DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of the DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Meter, DIAVUE Blood Glucose Test Strips and DIAVUE Control Solutions
2
{2}
The DIAVUE Prudential Glucose Monitoring System is based on an electrochemical biosensor technology (electrochemical) and the principle of capillary action. Capillary action at the end of the test strip draws the blood into the action chamber and the blood glucose result is displayed in 7 seconds.
The Diavue Control Solutions are aqueous based control materials available in 3 levels that are used to test the performance of the device. The target ranges are as follows: Level 1 35-65 mg/dL, Level 2 112-168 mg/dL, Level 3 224-336 mg/dL.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s): URIGHT TD-4254 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s): K082482
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Item | Candidate Devices
DIAVUE Prudential Blood
Glucose Monitoring System | Predicate
URIGHT TD-4254
Blood Glucose
Monitoring System
(k082482) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for use | The DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. It is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose (sugar) in fresh capillary whole blood samples (from finger). This system is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. It should not be used for the diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes, or testing on neonates. | Same |
| Test Principle | Electrochemical biosensor with carbon electrodes that measures current produced by a chemical reaction | Same |
| Enzyme | Glucose oxidase | Same |
{3}
| Item | Candidate Devices DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System | Predicate URIGHT TD-4254 Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k082482) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sample Type | Fresh capillary whole blood | Same |
| Sample Site | Fingertip | Same |
| Memory feature | 450 tests | Same |
| Day average | 7-, 14-, 21-, 28-, 60- and 90- day average glucose result | 7-, 14-, 30- day average glucose result |
| Measuring time | 7 sec | Same |
| Measurement range | 20-600 mg/dL | Same |
| Sample Volume | 0.7 μL | Same |
| Meter dimensions (mm) | 90(L)x52(W)x15(H) mm | 90(L)x52.4(W)x15.5(H) mm |
| Weight (g) | 45.6 g | 48.4 |
| Test strip | DIAVUE Test Strip | U-RIGHT Blood Glucose Test Strip |
| Autocoding | Yes | No |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- ISO 15197:2003- In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus.
- ISO 14971:2007 - Medical devices - Applications of risk management to medical devices
- CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach
- CLSI EP7-A2: Interference testing in clinical chemistry; Approved Guideline - $2^{\text{nd}}$ Edition
# L. Test Principle:
The test is based on electrochemical biosensor technology and the principle of capillary action. The electrical current generated by the reaction of glucose with the reagent of the strip is measured by the meter and is displayed as the corresponding blood glucose level. The strength of the current produced by the reaction depends on the amount of glucose in the blood sample.
{4}
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Repeatability and intermediate precision studies were performed. For the repeatability studies, 10 replicates of each of 5 spiked venous whole blood glucose levels were analyzed using 10 meters and 3 lots of test strips. Repeatability results are summarized below.
| | Test Strip Lot 1 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Samples | Mean | SD | % CV |
| Interval 1
30-50 mg/dL | 38.8 | 1.64 | 4.23 |
| Interval 2
51-110 mg/dL | 78.5 | 2.33 | 2.97 |
| Interval 3
111-150 mg/dL | 117.6 | 2.66 | 2.26 |
| Interval 4
151-250 mg/dL | 201.3 | 6.08 | 3.02 |
| Interval 5
251-400 mg/dL | 303.9 | 8.70 | 2.86 |
| | Test Strip Lot 2 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Samples | Mean | SD | % CV |
| Interval 1
30-50 mg/dL | 38.8 | 1.52 | 3.91 |
| Interval 2
51-110 mg/dL | 79.4 | 2.22 | 2.80 |
| Interval 3
111-150 mg/dL | 118.3 | 2.97 | 2.51 |
| Interval 4
151-250 mg/dL | 208.6 | 5.59 | 2.68 |
| Interval 5
251-400 mg/dL | 302.7 | 9.00 | 2.97 |
{5}
| | Test Strip Lot 3 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Samples | Mean | SD | % CV |
| Interval 1
30-50 mg/dL | 39.1 | 1.58 | 4.06 |
| Interval 2
51-110 mg/dL | 80.1 | 2.02 | 2.53 |
| Interval 3
111-150 mg/dL | 120.2 | 3.10 | 2.58 |
| Interval 4
151-250 mg/dL | 204.4 | 6.85 | 3.35 |
| Interval 5
251-400 mg/dL | 299.9 | 7.23 | 2.41 |
An intermediate precision study was performed, consisting of 10 replicates per day, for 10 days using each of 3 levels of control solution. Each sample was tested using 10 meters and 3 lots of test strips. Results are summarized below.
| | Test Strip Lot 1 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Samples | Mean | SD | % CV |
| Control Level 1
30-50 mg/dL | 40.1 | 1.77 | 4.41 |
| Control Level 2
110-150 mg/dL | 129.6 | 3.62 | 2.80 |
| Control Level 3
264-357 mg/dL | 315.3 | 7.59 | 2.41 |
| | Test Strip Lot 2 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Samples | Mean | SD | % CV |
| Control Level 1
30-50 mg/dL | 39.6 | 1.51 | 4.18 |
| Control Level 2
110-150 mg/dL | 130.4 | 2.98 | 2.28 |
| Control Level 3
264-357 mg/dL | 312.9 | 6.81 | 2.18 |
{6}
| | Test Strip Lot 3 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Samples | Mean | SD | % CV |
| Control Level 1
30-50 mg/dL | 39.2 | 1.51 | 3.85 |
| Control Level 2
110-150 mg/dL | 128.9 | 3.50 | 2.71 |
| Control Level 3
264-357 mg/dL | 309.0 | 7.90 | 2.56 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity was evaluated using 3 lots of test strips, 5 meters, and 10 venous whole blood samples with glucose levels ranging from 10-700 mg/dL, obtained by spiking pooled venous blood with a glucose solution. Each glucose level was analyzed 5 times over 3 test strip lots. Linear regression analysis for each test strip lot compared to the YSI resulted in:
$$
y = 0.9898x + 1.282; R^2 = 0.9988 \text{ for Test Strip Lot 1}
$$
$$
y = 0.9996x + 2.998; R^2 = 0.9983 \text{ for Test Strip Lot 2}
$$
$$
y = 0.9979x - 1.936; R^2 = 0.9986 \text{ for Test Strip Lot 3}
$$
The claimed range of measurement for this device is 20 to 600 mg/dL. Data from bench studies and software verification studies were provided to demonstrate that if a sample is less than 20 mg/dL, the result is flagged by the meter as LO. If a sample result exceeds 600 mg/dL, the result is flagged by the meter as HI.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability:
The Diavue Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System is traceable to the NIST SRM 917b reference material. The method comparison study was performed using the candidate device and YSI as the reference method (see Section M.2.a.).
Control Stability:
Diavue Control Solutions Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 are available for use with this test system. The control solutions are not provided with the meter. The sponsor provided a protocol and acceptance criteria to verify the closed-vial stability (shelf life) and open vial stability of the control solutions. The stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found acceptable. The sponsor claims a closed-vial (shelf life) of 24 months and open-vial stability of 3 months when stored at 36-86°F (2-30° C).
{7}
8
# Control Value Assignment:
Values for each level of Diavue control solution are assigned by repeat analysis using 25 Diavue glucose test strips from one lot and 25 Diavue Prudential glucose meters. The mean, SD and CV are used to establish the ranges for each control solution level which are provided on the test strip vial label.
# Test Strip Stability:
The sponsor provided a protocol and acceptance criteria to verify the closed-vial stability (shelf life) and open vial stability of the test strips. The stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The sponsor claims a closed-vial (shelf life) of 24 months and open-vial stability of 6 months when stored at 39-104°F (4-40° C) and between 10% to 85% relative humidity.
## d. Detection limit:
The reportable range is 20 to 600 mg/dL based on linearity studies above (section M.1.b.).
## e. Analytical specificity:
The sponsor tested substances for interference using 1 lot of test strips (4-7 test strips per interferent level), 4 meters, and 2 levels of glucose (achieved by adjusting human venous blood glucose levels to 70 mg/dL and 150 mg/dL). Samples were then spiked with the following interfering substances. Each sample was analyzed 4 times. The labeling states that elevated concentration of acetaminophen (>6.25 mg/dL), ascorbic acid (>5 mg/dL), bilirubin (un-conjugated) (>20 mg/dL), dopamine (>1.25 mg/dL), glutathione reduced (>46 mg/dL), levo-dopa (>1.4 mg/dL), methyl-dopa (>1.25 mg/dL), tolazamide (>12.5 mg/dL), uric acid (>10 mg/dL), galactose (>250 mg/dL), mannose (>250 mg/dL), triglycerides (>3000 mg/dL), hemoglobin (>100 mg/dL), and pralidoxime iodine (>5 mg/dL) may affect test results. The following table lists the concentrations of each substance at which no significant interference (≤10%) was detected:
| Test Substance | Therapeutic/ Physiological Levels (mg/dL) | Test Levels (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | 2 to 10 | 50 |
| Acyclovir | 0.23 to 0.31 | 3.1 |
| Allopurinol | 0.5 | 5 |
| Amitriptyline | 0.012 to 0.025 | 0.25 |
| Amoxicillin | 0.55 to 1.1 | 11 |
{8}
| Ampicillin | 0.5 | 5 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Salicylic acid | 10-30 | 60 |
| Atenolol | 0.1 to 2.0 | 10 |
| Bicarbonate | 244 | 336 |
| Cholic acid | 0.7 | 6.0 |
| Caffeine | 0.3 to 1.5 | 10 |
| Calcium | 2.8 mM | 5 mM |
| Chloride | 108 mM | 140 mM |
| Cholesterol | 300 | 500 |
| Chlonidine | 0.0001 to 0.0002 | 2 |
| Creatinine | 1.7 | 30 |
| Digoxin | 0.0001 to 0.0002 | 0.16 |
| Diphenhydramine | 0.01 to 0.1 | 1.0 |
| Enalapril | 0.012 to 0.015 | 0.15 |
| Ephendrine HCl | 1.8 | 50 |
| Erythromycin | 0.2 to 2.0 | 20 |
| Estrone | 0.0011 | 0.1 |
| Famotidine | 0.008 to 0,013 | 0.13 |
| Fluoxetine | 0.08 | 0.8 |
| Fructose | 7.5 | 1000 |
| Furosemide | 0.1 to 0.3 | 2.0 |
| Gentisic Acid | 0.2 to 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Glyburide | 0.018 to 0.025 | 1.07 |
| Ibuprofen | 1 to 7 | 55 |
| Isomalt | N/A | 1000 |
| Lacitol | N/A | 1000 |
| Lactose | < 0.5 | 1000 |
| Lidocaine | 0.15 to 0.16 | 6 |
| Magnesium | 1.1 mM | 5 mM |
| Malitol | N/A | 1000 |
| Maltose | N/A | 1000 |
| Mannitol | 0.0128 | 1000 |
| Metaproterenol | 0.0002 to 0.0013 | 1.81 |
| Metformin HCl | 0.5 to 4.0 | 50 |
| Metoprolol | 0.005 to 0.027 | 0.3 |
| Naproxen | 3 to 12 | 100 |
| Nifedipine | 0.017 | 0.17 |
| Nortriptyline | 0.005 to | 0.15 |
9
{9}
| | 0.015 | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Penicillin | 1.2 | 12 |
| Phenytoin | 1 to 2 | 10 |
| Piroxicam | 0.3 to 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Potassium | 5.9 mM | 10 mM |
| Sodium | 135 to 145 mM | 200 mM |
| Sorbitol | 0.044 | 1000 |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 5 to 12 | 20 |
| Sulfate | 1 mM | 5 mM |
| Terfenadine | 0.00015 to 0.00045 | 0.45 |
| Tetracycline | 0.4 | 10 |
| Theophylline | 1.0 to 2.0 | 25 |
| Tolbutamide | 4.32 to 24 | 64 |
| Total Protein | 6000 to 8000 | 12000 |
| Urea | 38 | 600 |
| Vancomycin | 0.025 | 25 |
| Verapamil | 0.014 to 0.045 | 0.45 |
| Vitamin E | 0.5 to 2.0 | 20 |
| Warfarin | 0.1 to 1.0 | 2 |
| Xylitol | N/A | 1000 |
| Xylose | N/A | 1000 |
f. Assay cut-off: Not applicable.
## 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Reference Method Comparison:
The sponsor performed a system accuracy evaluation comparing the DIAVUE Prudential BGMS to YSI. Healthcare professionals tested 180 capillary samples ranging in glucose concentration from 32 to 551 mg/dL, using 6 meters and 3 lots of test strips using the DIAVUE Prudential meter and the YSI (the reference method). Eight of the samples tested were glycolyzed or spiked to achieve concentrations < 50 mg/dL and > 483 mg/dL. Results are summarized below.
For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 14/16 (87.5%) | 16/16 (100.0%) | 16/16 (100.0%) |
{10}
For glucose concentrations ≥ 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 76/164
(46.3%) | 160/164
(97.6%) | 164/164
(100.0%) | 164/164
(100.0%) |
Linear Regression Analysis:
| Comparison | N | Slope and y-intercept | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DIAVUE Prudential vs. YSI | 180 | Y = 0.9871x + 3.6338 | 0.9914 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. Capillary whole blood is the only indicated matrix.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Lay-User Study:
The sponsor performed a lay-user study where accuracy of the device was tested using 172 fingerstick samples obtained by the lay-user. Participants, who were able to read the User's Manual in English, were instructed to read the manual and perform testing on the finger. A technician collected capillary blood for measurements on YSI. Samples in the study contained glucose concentrations that ranged from 49 to 470 mg/dL. Results are summarized below.
For glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL
| within ± 5 mg/dL | within ± 10 mg/dL | within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 13/24 (54.2%) | 24/24 (100.0%) | 24/24 (100.0%) |
For glucose concentrations ≥ 75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | within ± 10 % | within ± 15 % | within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 67/148
(45.3%) | 142/148
(95.9%) | 148/148
(100.0%) | 148/148
(100.0%) |
Linear Regression Analysis:
| N | Slope and y-intercept | R² |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 172 | Y = 0.9899x - 2.069 | 0.9817 |
{11}
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
| Time of day | Range, Non-diabetes |
| --- | --- |
| Before meals | Less than 100 mg/dL |
| After meals | Less than 140 mg/dL |
The sponsor references: American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, Diabetes Care. 2012;33:S1-100.
N. Instrument Name:
DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Meter
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for additional readings.
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?:
Yes _____ or No ☐
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?:
Yes _____ or No ☐
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ or No ☑
The applicant has provided documentation that indicates the device was designed and developed under good software life-cycle processes.
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
12
{12}
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger. Since the whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
The meter is a non-coding meter, therefore no coding is required by the user.
6. Quality Control:
The sponsor manufactures three levels of glucose control solution, Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 to be used with the DIAVUE Prudential Blood Glucose Monitoring System. These DIAVUE Control Solutions must be purchased separately and are not provided with the device kits. Instructions for how to purchase the control solution are provided in the user manuals. To perform a control test the user is instructed to press the “M” button when the test strip and blood symbol appears on the screen. The “ctl” symbol will then appear on the display. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label. If the control values fall outside these ranges, the user is referred to the user manual and customer support for problems and more information
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
1. The device is intended for single-patient use. Disinfection studies were performed on the DIAVUE Prudential meter by outside commercial laboratory testing services to determine the disinfection efficacy of the meter to the recommended cleaning and disinfection protocol, and its effectiveness in preventing the spread of bloodborne pathogens, particularly hepatitis B virus (HBV). Micro-Kill Disinfecting wipes (EPA Reg. No: 59894-10-37549) were validated, demonstrating complete inactivation of live virus for use with the meter. The sponsor also conducted robustness studies and demonstrated that there was no change in performance or in the external materials of the meter after 5,000 cleaning and disinfection cycles to simulate 5 years of use by lay-users. Each robustness cycle tested consisted of one pre-clean wipe and one disinfecting wipe.
2. The effect of different hematocrit levels was evaluated with 3 lots of test strips using 10 test strips at each of 6 concentration ranges of glucose (20-30, 50-80, 100-150, 200-250, 350-400, 550-600 mg/dL). The glucose samples were prepared from venous blood samples at 5 hematocrit levels at approximately 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60%. Each of the results were compared to the value obtained from the same plasma glucose concentration obtained by YSI. The data vs. YSI was reviewed and was found to be acceptable to support the claimed hct range of 20-60%.
3. The effect of altitude was evaluated at five whole blood samples with glucose concentrations ranging from 60 to 568 mg/dL, testing at sea level to 15,000 feet (4500 meters) above sea level. Each glucose concentration was measured 4 times at each altitude. The bias was calculated relative to YSI at sea level up to 15,000 feet. The
13
{13}
results demonstrate that the system meets the acceptance criteria for testing at altitudes up to 11,500 feet (3,500 meters) above sea level.
4. The sponsor performed temperature and humidity studies at the combined extremes of 10°C/RH: 10%, 40°C/RH: 10%, 10°C/RH: 85%, and 40°C/RH: 85%, with venous blood samples (66-300 mg/dL) that demonstrated that the DIAVUE Prudential meter can be used at temperatures of 50 to 104°F (10 to 40°C) and 10% to 85% relative humidity.
5. Insufficient sample studies were performed at volumes of 0.4 to 1.5μL on five meters and one test strip lot. Three glucose concentrations were tested ranging from approximately 40-330 mg/dL, as determined by the YSI. Appropriate sample volume was determined if the meter testing could start properly and if the meter results matched the YSI results. A blood volume ≥ 0.7 μL, the stated minimum sample volume requirement, met the criteria.
6. The sponsor provided a readability study and obtained Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Scores of 7.3 for the test strip insert, 7.2 for the DIAVUE Prudential User's Manual, and 7.2 for the control solution package insert.
7. The sponsor stated that they conformed to the following guidelines and provided the appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance:
- IEC/EN 61010-1: General Requirements Part 1. Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and laboratory use, 2001.
- IEC/EN 61010-2-101: Particular Requirements for in vitro diagnostic medical equipment, 2002
- EMC testing was evaluated and certified by SGS Taiwain Ltd. and a letter of attestation was issued to BioCare Corporation.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
14
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.