The CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit is designed for separation and quantification of the glycated fraction of hemoglobin in human whole blood, by capillary HbA1c electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is effective in monitoring long-term glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. The CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit is designed for Professional Use Only.
Device Story
System uses capillary electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) to separate and quantify HbA1c glycated hemoglobin fraction from human whole blood. Input: whole blood samples (K3EDTA anticoagulant). Process: automated aspiration, high-voltage protein separation in silica capillaries, and direct detection at 415 nm. Output: relative quantification of HbA1c fraction, reported as %HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP) and mmol/mol (IFCC). Used in clinical laboratory settings; operated by trained professionals. Software automatically performs relative quantification; identifies hemoglobin variants based on migration order (A2/C, E, S/D, F, A0, A1c). High resolution allows quantification even in presence of labile HbA1c, carbamylated/acetylated hemoglobins, and variants. Benefits: provides standardized HbA1c measurement for diabetes management; automated variant detection improves accuracy.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance studies compared CAPILLARYS Hb A1c procedure to TOSOH G8 HPLC method. Studies confirmed concordance in qualitative and quantitative analysis of HbA1c. Standardization verified against NGSP and IFCC requirements. No clinical prospective/retrospective patient outcome studies reported.
Technological Characteristics
Capillary electrophoresis system using silica capillaries. Alkaline buffer (pH 9.4). Absorbance detection at 415 nm. Automated sample preparation (dilution/hemolysis). 8-capillary parallel analysis. PC-based interface using PHORESIS software. Standardized to NGSP/IFCC. ISO 9001/13485 certified manufacturing.
Indications for Use
Indicated for monitoring long-term glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus using human whole blood samples. Professional use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glycosylated hemoglobin assay is a device used to measure the glycosylated hemoglobins (A1a , A1b , and A1c ) in a patient's blood by a column chromatographic procedure. Measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin is used to assess the level of control of a patient's diabetes and to determine the proper insulin dosage for a patient. Elevated levels of glycosylated hemoglobin indicate uncontrolled diabetes in a patient.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k122101
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Whole blood hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
D. Type of Test:
Capillary Electrophoresis
E. Applicant:
Sebia Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit
Hb A1c CAPILLARY Calibrators
Hb A1c CAPILLARY Controls
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LCP | II | 21 CFR 864.7470 | Hematology (81) |
| JIS | II | 21 CFR 862.1150 | Chemistry (75) |
| JJX | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR 862.1660 | Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
{1}
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
The CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit is designed for separation and quantification of the HbA1c glycated fraction of hemoglobin in human whole blood, by capillary electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is effective in monitoring long-term glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. The CAPILLARYS HbA1c kit is designed for Professional Use Only.
The Hb A1c CAPILLARY Calibrators are designed for the calibration and migration control of human glycated hemoglobin A1c quantification with SEBIA CAPILLARYS HbA1c electrophoresis procedure performed with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING automated instrument for capillary electrophoresis. The Hb A1c CAPILLARY Calibrators are designed for Professional Use Only.
The Hb A1C CAPILLARY Controls are designed for the quality control of human glycated hemoglobin A1c quantification with CAPILLARTYS Hb A1c electrophoresis procedure performed with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING automated instrument for capillary electrophoresis. The Hb A1c CAPILLARY Controls are designed for Professional Use Only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription Use Only
4. Special instrument requirements:
CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument
I. Device Description:
The CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit, control and calibrators are to be used with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX- Piercing system.
The components are summarized as follows:
- CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit contains a ready to use buffer (2 vials, 700 ml each), a ready to use hemolysing solution (1 vial, 700 ml), Wash solution (1 vial, 75 ml), Green Dilution segments (1 pack of 90) and Filters (4 filters per kit)
- Hb A1c CAPILLARY Calibrators consist of a HbA1c CAPILLARYS Calibrator 1 (green cap) and a HbA1c CAPILLARYS Calibrator 2 (red cap), 1 vial of each, 600 µL each and bar code labels for each level of calibrator.
2
{2}
- Hb A1c CAPILLARY Controls consist of HbA1c CAPILLARYS Control 1 (white cap) and HbA1c CAPILLARYS Control 2 (black cap), 1 vial of each, 600 µL each. White and Grey Dilution segments (4 each) and Barcode labels for each level of control.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
TOSOH G8 Automated Glycohemoglobin Analyzer HLC-723G8
TOSOH A1C Calibrator Set
TOSOH Hemoglobin A1c Controls
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k071132, k021484
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences: Reagent | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device
CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit | Predicate Device
TOSOH G8 Automated
Glycohemoglobin
Analyzer HLC-723G8
k071132 |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | The CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit is designed for separation and quantification of the HbA1c glycated fraction of hemoglobin in human whole blood, by capillary electrophoresis in alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c is effective in monitoring long-term glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus. The CAPILLARYS HbA1c kit is designed for Professional Use Only. | The Tosoh G8 Automated Glycohemoglobin Analyzer HLC-723G8 is intended for In Vitro diagnostic Use for the measurement of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in whole blood specimens. |
| Method | Free solution capillary electrophoresis | Ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) |
| Sample Type | Whole blood | Whole blood |
{3}
| Similarities and Differences: Reagent | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device
CAPILLARYS Hb A1c kit | Predicate Device
TOSOH G8 Automated
Glycohemoglobin
Analyzer HLC-723G8
k071132 |
| Measuring Range | 4.0-14.7% HbA1c | 4.0-16.9% HbA1c |
| Collection tubes | K3EDTA anticoagulant | EDTA anticoagulant |
| Absorbance wave length | 410 and 510 nm | 415 nm |
| Similarities and Differences: Calibrators | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device
Hb A1c CAPILLARY
Calibrators | Predicate
TOSOH A1c Calibrator
Set
k071132 |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | The HbA1c CAPILLARY Calibrators are designed for the calibration and migration control of human glycated hemoglobin A1c quantification with SEBIA CAPILLARYS HbA1c electrophoresis procedure performed with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING automated instrument for capillary electrophoresis. The HbA1c CAPILLARY Calibrators are designed for Professional Use Only. | The A1c Calibrator Set is a reference agent designed for calibrating the Tosoh Automated Glycohemoglobin Analyzer |
| Format | 2 levels | Same |
| Storage Temperature | 3 years at-30°C/-18°C (-22°F/0°F). When reconstituted the in use storage stability is 1 week at 2-8°C (36-46°F), 6 months at -22°C / -18°C (-8°F/0°F). Do not freeze and that more than 3 times | Unopened: between -30°C and -18°C until expiration date printed on vial. Opened and reconstituted: -18°C and -22°C for 6 months. Do not freeze and thaw more than 3 times. |
{4}
| Similarities and Differences: Controls | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device
Hb A1c CAPILLARY Controls | Predicate
TOSOH Hemoglobin A1C control
k021484 |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | The HbA1C CAPILLARY Controls are designed for the quality control of human glycated hemoglobin A1c quantification with CAPILLARTYS HbA1c electrophoresis procedure performed with the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING automated instrument for capillary electrophoresis. The HbA1c CAPILLARY Controls are designed for Professional Use Only. | The TOSOH Hemoglobin A1c Controls are intended for use as quality control materials to monitor the precision of laboratory testing procedures for HbA1c quantitation. The controls are designed for use with Tosoh Bioscience, Inc G7 and G8 analyzers. |
| Format | 2 levels; 1vial (0.6mL) per level | 2 levels; 4 vials (0.25mL) per level |
| Storage Temperature | 3 years at 2-8°C (36-46°F). When reconstituted the controls are stable for 1 day at 2-8°C (36-46°F), 6 months at -22°C/-18°C (-8°F/0°F). When hemolyzed the controls are stable for 1 month at -22°C/-18°C (-8°F/0°F). Do not freeze and thaw more than 3 times. | Hemoglobin A1c controls are stable until the last day of the expiration date shown on the vial when stored unopened at 2-8°C |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI Guideline, EP9-A2: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline Second edition
CLSI Guideline, EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Methods; Approved Guideline
CLSI Guideline, EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices; Approved Guideline Second edition
CLSI Guideline, EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline-Second edition
{5}
6
L. Test Principle:
The CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX Piercing HbA1c assay employs the principle of capillary electrophoresis in free solution. With this technique, charged molecules are separated by their electrophoretic mobility in an alkaline buffer with a specific pH. Separation also occurs according to the electrolyte pH and electroosmotic flow.
The assay has silica capillaries functioning in parallel allowing 8 simultaneous analyses for HbA1c quantification from a whole blood sample. A sample dilution with hemolysing solution is prepared and injected by aspiration at the anodic end of the capillary. A high voltage protein separation is them performed and direct detection of the hemoglobins is made at the cathodic end of the capillary at 415 nm, which is the absorbance wavelength specific to hemoglobins. Before each run, the capillaries are washed with a wash solution and prepared for the next analysis with buffer.
Direct detection provided accurate relative quantification of individual hemoglobin A1c fraction. In addition, the high resolution of CAPILLARYS HbA1c procedure allows the quantification of HbA1c, and particularly, even in the presence of labile HbA1c, carbamylated and acetylated hemoglobins, and major hemoglobin variants.
By using alkaline pH buffer, normal and abnormal (or variant) hemoglobins are detected in the following order, from cathode to anode: A2/C, E, S/D, F, A0, other Hb (including minor HbA1) and then A1c.
At the end of analysis, relative quantification of individual HbA1c fraction is performed automatically. The HbA1c concentrations are standardized and indicated in %HbA1c (DCCT/NGSP) and in mmol/mol (IFCC) units.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
**Precision within the same capillary**
Eight different blood samples were analyzed using the CAPILLARYS A1c procedure in 8 capillaries of the same CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. The analyzed blood samples included 3 samples with normal HbA1c levels (~5.1-5.5%) (samples 1,2 and 3), 1 sample with HbA1c level close to the cut-off value (6% HbA1c) (sample 4) and 4 samples with elevated HbA1c levels (~7.9, 8.4, 9.8 and 10.0%), (samples 5, 6, 7 and 8). Each blood sample was analyzed on the same capillary, including 40 runs over 20 working days. Samples were analyzed in duplicate. The results are shown below:
{6}
7
| Sample | N | Mean (%A1c) | Within-run (%CV) | Between-run (%CV) | Between-day (%CV) | Total (%CV) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample No.1 | 80 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.8 |
| Sample No.2 | 80 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Sample No.3 | 80 | 5.5 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Sample No.4 | 80 | 6.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Sample No.5 | 80 | 7.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
| Sample No.6 | 80 | 8.4 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
| Sample No.7 | 80 | 9.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| Sample No.8 | 80 | 10.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
## Precision between capillaries from the same instrument
Eight different blood samples were analyzed using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay in 8 capillaries of the same CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. The analyzed blood samples included 3 samples with normal HbA1c levels (~5.1-5.5%) (samples 1, 2 and 3), 1 sample with a HbA1c value close to the cut-off value (6% HbA1c)(sample 4) and 4 samples with elevated HbA1c levels (~7.9, 8.4, 9.8 and 10.0%) (samples 5, 6, 7 and 8). Each sample was assayed on all capillaries from the same instrument to include 40 runs over 20 working days. Samples were analyzed in duplicate within each run. The results are shown below:
| Sample | N | Mean (%A1c) | Within-run (%CV) | Between-run (%CV) | Between-day (%CV) | Total (%CV) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample No.1 | 80 | 5.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.9 |
| Sample No.2 | 80 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Sample No.3 | 80 | 5.5 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 |
| Sample No.4 | 80 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| Sample No.5 | 80 | 8.0 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Sample No.6 | 80 | 8.4 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Sample No.7 | 80 | 9.9 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Sample No.8 | 80 | 10.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
## Precision between lots and instruments
Eight different blood samples were analyzed using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay in 8 capillaries of 3 different CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instruments and with 3 lots of CAPILLARYS HbA1c kits. The analyzed blood samples included 3 samples with normal HbA1c levels (~5.0-5.5%) (samples 1, 2 and 3, 1 sample with HbA1c level close to the cut-off value (6%); (sample 4) and 4 samples with elevated HbA1c levels (~7.9-10.0% HbA1c) (samples 5,6,7 and 8). Each blood sample was analyzed on all capillaries from each instrument, including 60 runs over 24 days. Samples were analyzed in duplicate. The results are shown below:
{7}
| Sample | Mean (%A1c) | Within-Run reproducibility | | Total reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | % CV min | % CV max | % CV min | % CV max |
| Sample No.1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 2.6 |
| Sample No.2 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 2.4 |
| Sample No.3 | 5.5 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
| Sample No.4 | 6.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.7 |
| Sample No.5 | 7.9 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.7 |
| Sample No.6 | 8.4 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| Sample No.7 | 9.8 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Sample No.8 | 10.0 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
An additional precision study was performed in order to demonstrate the precision of the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument for samples with elevated HbA1c levels. The analyzed blood samples included 4 samples with high HbA1c levels (~11.0, 12.0, 13.0 and 14.1%) Each blood sample was analyzed in duplicate using all capillaries from each of two instruments, and 2 lots of reagent. The results are shown below:
| Sample | Mean (%A1c) | Within-Run reproducibility | | Total reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | % CV min | % CV max | % CV min | % CV max |
| Sample No.1 | 11.0 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Sample No.2 | 12.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Sample No.3 | 13.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| Sample No.4 | 14.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The linearity of the CAPILLARYS HbA1c procedure was evaluated based on CLSI EP6-A guideline "Evaluation of the Linearity Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach". Two blood samples, including a normal sample with HbA1c concentration at $4.0\%$ and an elevated HbA1c level sample with HbA1c concentration at $14.7\%$ were mixed within different proportions and the dilutions were electrophoresed with the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit using the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument. Samples were analyzed in duplicate.
A polynomial regression analysis was performed and the sponsor determined that the $3^{\text{rd}}$ order regression provided the best fit. However, the $\%$ difference between $1^{\text{st}}$ order regression and the best fit $3^{\text{rd}}$ order regression is less than $0.3\%$ (A1c units) at all linearity levels tested as summarized in the table below.
{8}
Comparison of 1st Order and 3rd Order (best fit) regressions
| Expected value (%) | 1st Order value (%) | 3rd Order Value (%) | 1st – 3rd Difference (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.7 | 15.0 | 14.8 | 0.2 |
| 14.1 | 13.9 | 13.9 | 0.1 |
| 12.8 | 12.9 | 12.9 | 0.1 |
| 11.9 | 11.8 | 11.9 | 0.1 |
| 10.9 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 0.1 |
| 9.8 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 0.1 |
| 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 0.1 |
| 7.5 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 0.0 |
| 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 0.1 |
| 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 0.1 |
| 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 0.1 |
The 1st order linear regression generated is:
$$
Y = -0.108x + 15.027, r^2 = 0.997, r = 0.998
$$
The sponsor claims a linearity range of 4.0 – 14.7% HbA1c
In addition, 2 blood samples, including a normal sample with HbA1c concentration at 5.4% HbA1c and an elevated HbA1c level sample with HbA1c concentration at 7.8% HbA1c were both serially diluted in hemolysing solution and electrophoresed with the CAPILLARYS HbA1c procedure. According to the sponsor, the tests were determined to be linear within the entire ranges studied from 1.4 to 31.0 g/dL total hemoglobin concentration of the samples.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Traceability: The CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay is certified with the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP). The NGSP certification expires in one year. See NGSP website for current certification at http://www.ngsp.org.
Value Assignment: Calibrator and control values are assigned by multiple measurements using multiple CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instruments and IFCC traceable calibrators.
Stability: The stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and determined to be adequate.
The expiration date of the different components of the CAPILLARYS HbA1c kit are indicated as follows:
{9}
| Kit component | Shelf-Life | On Board Stability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| CAPILLARYS HbA1c buffer: | 2 years at 2-8°C (36-46°F) | 20 days at 15-30°C (59-86°F) |
| CAPILLARYS HbA1c hemolysing solution: | 2 years at 2-30°C (36-86°F) | 2 months at 37°C (99°F) |
| CAPILLARYS/MINICAP wash solution: | 3 years at 2-30°C (36-86°F) | 3 months at 37°C (99°F) |
The shelf life of the freeze dried Hb A1c CAPILLARY Calibrators is 3 years at $30^{\circ}\mathrm{C} / -18^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ $(-22^{\circ}\mathrm{F} / 0^{\circ}\mathrm{F})$ . When reconstituted the in use storage stability is 1 week at 2- $8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ $(36 - 46^{\circ}\mathrm{F})$ , 6 months at $-22^{\circ}\mathrm{C} / -18^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ $(-8^{\circ}\mathrm{F} / 0^{\circ}\mathrm{F})$ . The labeling states that the Hb A1c CAPILLARY Calibrators should not be frozen and thawed more than 3 times.
The shelf life of the Hb A1c CAPILLARYS controls are 3 years at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ $(36 - 46^{\circ}\mathrm{F})$ . When reconstituted the controls are stable for 1 day at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ $(36 - 46^{\circ}\mathrm{F})$ , 6 months at $-22^{\circ}\mathrm{C} / -18^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ $(-8^{\circ}\mathrm{F} / 0^{\circ}\mathrm{F})$ . When hemolyzed the controls are stable for 1 month at $-22^{\circ}\mathrm{C} / -18^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ $(-8^{\circ}\mathrm{F} / 0^{\circ}\mathrm{F})$ . The labeling states that the HbA1c CAPILLARYS controls should not be frozen and thawed more than 3 times.
# d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Blank (LoB) and Limit of Detection (LoD) were determined by assaying a zero sample (blank) and five low HbA1c samples according to CLSI guideline EP17-A. The results are as follows:
$\mathrm{LoB} = 0.3\%$ $\mathrm{LoD} = 1.2\%$
The claimed measuring range, $4.0 - 14.7\%$ , is based on linearity. See 1b. above
# e. Analytical specificity:
i.) Studies were performed to assess common or known substances that could interfere with the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit. The interfering substances were evaluated in whole blood K3EDTA samples that contained three different concentrations of A1c ( $\sim 5.3\%$ , $\sim 7.0\%$ and $\sim 10.3\%$ ). Samples containing various concentrations of potential interferents were tested and the results compared to those obtained from control samples containing no potential interfering substances. The sponsor's definition of non-significant interference is $\geq 0.3\%$ HbA1c between the tested and the control samples.
The results are as follows:
| Potential interfering substance | Concentration at which no significant interference (≤0.3%) was observed |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | ≤ 25.6 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | ≤ 1120 mg/dL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | ≤ 2178 IU/mL |
{10}
| Urea | ≤291 mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Ascorbic Acid | ≤60 mg/dL |
| Glybenclamide | ≤3 mg/dL |
ii.) To study interference from Carbamlyated hemoglobin, three K3EDTA whole blood patient samples with A1c concentrations at $\sim 5.1\%$ , $\sim 7.0\%$ and $\sim 10.1\%$ were split into two aliquots. One aliquot, at each A1c level, was spiked with $1\mathrm{mmol / L}$ of Potassium Cyanate and incubated for 3 hours at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Another aliquot, at each A1c level, was incubated for 3 hours at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Samples were then analyzed on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit. Samples were analyzed in triplicate. The sponsor's definition of non-significant interference is $\leq 0.3\mathrm{HbA1c}\%$ between the tested and the control samples.
The sponsor concluded that Carbamylated hemoglobin does not interfere with this assay.
iii.) To study interference from labile hemoglobin, three K3EDTA whole blood patient samples with A1c concentrations at $\sim 5.3\%$ , $\sim 7.7\%$ and $\sim 11.3\%$ were split into two aliquots. One aliquot, at each A1c level, was spiked with glucose (100 mmol/mol; glucose concentration= $1800~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ) and incubated for 90 minutes at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Another aliquot, at each A1c level, was incubated for 90 minutes at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Samples were then analyzed on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit. Samples were tested in triplicate. The sponsor's definition of non-significant interference is $\leq 0.3$ HbA1c%.
The sponsor concluded that labile A1c does not interfere with this assay.
iii.) To study interference from acetylated hemoglobin, two whole blood K3 EDTA samples with A1c concentrations at $\sim 4.9\%$ and $\sim 8.3\%$ were split into two aliquots. One aliquot, at each A1c level, was used as the control sample and the other aliquot was spiked with acetylated hemoglobin (180 mg/dL conc.) and incubated for 6 hours at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . All aliquots were tested on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit. Samples were tested in triplicate. The sponsor's definition of non-significant interference is $\leq 0.3$ HbA1c%.
The sponsor concluded that acetylated hemoglobin up to $180\mathrm{mg / dL}$ does not interfere with this assay.
iv.) To study interference from acetylsalicylic acid, two whole blood K3EDTA samples with A1c concentrations at $\sim 4.9\%$ and $\sim 8.3\%$ were split into two aliquots. One aliquot, at each A1c level, was used as the control sample and the other aliquot was incubated at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 6 hours with acetylsalicylic acid (180 mg/dL). The control samples which did not contain acetylsalicylic acid were incubated at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 6 hours. All aliquots were tested on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit. Samples were tested in triplicate. The sponsor's definition of non-significant interference is $\leq 0.3$ HbA1c%.
{11}
The sponsor concluded that acetylsalicylic acid up to 180 mg/dL does not interfere with this assay.
v) A hemoglobin variant interference study was carried out using samples known to contain Hemoglobin variants S, E, D and C. These variant samples were tested on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit. The sponsor’s definition of non-significant interference is ±10% difference between the candidate method and the comparative method.
The testing results show there is no significant interference for HbS (≤ 40%), HbE (≤ 32%), HbD (≤ 42%) and HbC (≤ 44%).
The sponsor includes the following limitation in their labeling: “due to the number of variants, the presence of another hemoglobin variant may be observed in the HbA1c migration zone; in the case of a shoulder on HbA1c, no result will be reported by the software.
vi) An additional variant interference study was carried out to study the variant interference from Hemoglobin F. Two whole blood samples with HbA1c concentrations of ~5.5% and ~8.3% contained varying concentrations of HbF and were tested on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit.
The testing results show there is no significant interference for HbF ≤ 15% therefore the sponsor has included the following limitation in their labeling: Samples that contain high amounts of HbF (>15%), usually found in some people with thalassemia, infants, and in some pregnant women, may yield a lower than expected HbA1c result with this assay.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not-applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
282 whole blood K2EDTA samples (119 normal and 163 with elevated HbA1c) with HbA1c ranging from 4.6% to 16.4% HbA1c were analyzed in singlicate using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument (candidate device) and the Tosoh G8 Automated Glycohemoglobin Analyzer HPLC 723 G8. Method comparison studies were performed according to CLSI EP9-A2 guideline. The linear regression correlation was calculated as follows:
12
{12}
| HbA1c | Correlation Coefficient | y-intercept | Slope | HbA1c range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Percentage (%) | 0.996 | 0.438 | 0.913 | 4.6 – 16.4 |
# b. Matrix comparison:
A total of 26 random matched sample pairs (K2 EDTA and K3 EDTA) were tested on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX-PIERCING instrument using the CAPILLARYS HbA1s assay kit. The linear regression is presented in the table below:
| Fraction | Number of Samples | Correlation Coefficient | y-intercept | Slope | Sample range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HbAc1% | 26 | 0.998 | 0.139 | 0.984 | 4.7-10.6 |
An additional matrix comparison study was performed to include samples in the higher range of the assay. A total of 44 random matched sample pairs (K2EDTA and K3EDTA) were tested on the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX PIERCING instrument using the CAPILLARYS HbA1c assay kit. The linear regression is presented in the table below:
| Fraction | Number of Samples | Correlation Coefficient | y-intercept | Slope | Sample range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HbAc1% | 44 | 0.999 | 0.013 | 1.001 | 4.7-14.2 |
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
# 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
# 5. Expected values/Reference range:
Reference Range
| | NGSP | IFCC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Increased risk for diabetes | ≥6.5% | ≥48mmol/mol |
{13}
14
1American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2012. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1:S11-63
## N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
## O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.