K122019 · Meridian Bioscience, Inc. · OYZ · Sep 13, 2012 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K122019
Device Name
STREPTOCOCCUS APP. SEROLOGICAL REAGENTS
Applicant
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
Product Code
OYZ · Microbiology
Decision Date
Sep 13, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3740
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Real-World Evidence, Pediatric
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K122019 · Sep 13, 2012
STREPTOCOCCUS APP. SEROLOGICAL REAGENTS
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
Leftover clinical throat swab specimens
The clinical performance of the illumigene Group A Strep assay was evaluated using 798 leftover clinical specimens collected from patients undergoing routine diagnostic testing for Group A Streptococcus at three clinical sites.
illumigene Group A Streptococcus Clinical Trial; Retrospective evaluation of leftover clinical specimens; Follow-up/Duration: April to June 2012; Study Period: April 2012 - June 2012
Patients presenting with symptoms of pharyngitis requiring Group A Streptococcus testing; Sample Size: 798; Number of Sites: 3
The illumigene® Group A Streptococcus (Group A Strep) assay, performed on the illumipro-10™, is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus) in throat swab specimens. The illumigene Group A Strep assay utilizes loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) technology to detect Streptococcus pyogenes by targeting a segment of the Streptococcus pyogenes genome. Results from the illumigene Group A Strep assay can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis. The assay is not intended to monitor treatment for Group A Streptococcus infections. illumigene Group A Strep is intended for use in hospital, reference or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use.
Device Story
System detects Streptococcus pyogenes in throat swab specimens using loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP). Process: sample preparation via heat treatment; isothermal amplification in illumigene Test Device; illumipro-10 instrument monitors light transmission changes caused by magnesium pyrophosphate precipitation. Instrument calculates ratio of final to initial light transmission (Sf:Si) and compares against fixed cut-off (82% for test, 90% for control). Used in hospital, reference, or state laboratories by professional staff. Output: qualitative Positive/Negative result. Benefits: rapid molecular detection (under 60 minutes) aiding diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study (n=798) compared illumigene assay to composite bacterial culture. Sensitivity: 98.0% (95% CI: 93.1-99.5%); Specificity: 97.7% (95% CI: 96.3-98.6%). Study included patients of all ages (infants to >21 years) and both genders. Discrepant analysis using alternate molecular method supported false-positive results as likely true positives.
Technological Characteristics
LAMP-based molecular amplification. Target: 206 bp sequence of S. pyogenes genome. Instrumentation: illumipro-10 (automated isothermal amplification and detection). Detection principle: turbidimetric measurement of magnesium pyrophosphate precipitate via light transmission. Connectivity: standalone. Sterilization: N/A (disposable test devices). Software: fixed cut-off algorithm.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the qualitative detection of Streptococcus pyogenes in throat swab specimens from symptomatic patients of all ages. Not intended for point-of-care use or monitoring treatment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Streptococcus spp. serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera (excluding streptococcal exoenzyme reagents made from enzymes secreted by streptococci) used in serological tests to identify Streptococcus spp. from cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Streptococcus and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Pathogenic streptococci are associated with infections, such as sore throat, impetigo (an infection characterized by small pustules on the skin), urinary tract infections, rheumatic fever, and kidney disease.
Predicate Devices
GEN-PROBE® Group A Streptococcus Direct Test (K924715)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K122019
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain substantial equivalence for the illumigene® Group A Streptococcus (Group A Strep) DNA Amplification Assay
C. Measurand:
A segment of *Streptococcus pyogenes* genome (206 base-pair sequence)
D. Type of Test
Qualitative in vitro diagnostic Loop-mediated DNA amplification (LAMP) technology
E. Applicant:
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
illumigene® Group A Streptococcus (GBS) DNA Amplification Assay
illumigene® Group A Strep External Control Kit
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| OYZ-Group A Streptococcus DNA Amplification System; OOI-Real Time Nucleic Acid Amplification System | Class I | 21 CFR 866.3740 – Streptococcus spp. Serological Reagents | Microbiology (83) |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use:
The illumigene® Group A Streptococcus (Group A Strep) assay, performed on the illumipro-10™, is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus) in throat swab specimens.
The illumigene Group A Strep assay utilizes loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) technology to detect Streptococcus pyogenes by targeting a segment of the Streptococcus pyogenes genome. Results from the illumigene Group A Strep assay can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis. The assay is not intended to monitor treatment for Group A Streptococcus infections. illumigene Group A Strep is intended for use in hospital, reference or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The illumigene® Group A Streptococcus (Group A Strep) assay, performed on the illumipro-10™, is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus) in throat swab specimens.
The illumigene Group A Strep assay utilizes loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) technology to detect Streptococcus pyogenes by targeting a segment of the Streptococcus pyogenes genome. Results from the illumigene Group A Strep assay can be used as an aid in the diagnosis of Group A Streptococcal pharyngitis. The assay is not intended to monitor treatment for Group A Streptococcus infections. illumigene Group A Strep is intended for use in hospital, reference or state laboratory settings. The device is not intended for point-of-care use.
3. Special conditions for use statement:
- For professional use
- The device is not intended for point-of-care use
4. Special instrument requirements:
illumipro-10™ Automated Isothermal Amplification and Detection System
I. Device Description:
The illumigene Molecular Diagnostic Test System is comprised of the illumigene® Group A Strep DNA Amplification Test Kit, the illumigene® Group A Strep External Control Kit and the illumipro-10™ Automated Isothermal Amplification and Detection System.
The illumigene Group A Strep assay utilizes loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technology to detect the presence of Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A beta-
{2}
hemolytic Streptococcus) in throat swab specimens. Each illumigene Group A Strep assay is completed using an illumigene Sample Preparation Apparatus II/Negative Control III containing Control material, an illumigene Group A Streptococcus Test Device and an illumigene Heat Treatment Tube. Samples are diluted in the illumigene Sample Preparation Apparatus II and dispensed into an illumigene Heat Treatment Tube. Target and Control DNA is made available for isothermal amplification via heat-treatment. DNA amplification occurs in the illumigene Test Device.
The illumipro-10 heats each illumigene Group A Strep Test Device containing prepared sample and Control material, facilitating amplification of target DNA. When S. pyogenes is present in the throat swab specimen, a 206 base pair sequence of the S. pyogenes genome is amplified and magnesium pyrophosphate is generated. Magnesium pyrophosphate forms a precipitate in the reaction mixture. The illumipro-10 monitors the absorbance characteristics of the reaction solutions at the assay Run Start (Signalinitial, Si) and at the assay Run End (Signalfinal, Sf). The illumipro-10 calculates the change in light transmission between Run End and Run Start (Sf:Si) and compares the ratio to a fixed cut-off value for disposition of results.
Fixed cut-off values for the TEST chamber are used to report sample results. TEST chamber Sf:Si ratios less than 82% are reported as 'POSITIVE'; TEST chamber Sf:Si ratios greater than or equal to 82% are reported as 'NEGATIVE'. Numerical values are not reported. Fixed cut-off values for the CONTROL chamber are used to determine validity. CONTROL chamber Sf:Si ratios less than 90% are considered valid and allow for reporting of TEST chamber results(POSITIVE, NEGATIVE). CONTROL chamber Sf:Si ratios greater than or equal to 90% are considered invalid and prevent reporting of TEST chamber results. Invalid CONTROL chamber reactions are reported as 'INVALID'. Numerical values are not reported. More stringent cut-off criteria are applied to the CONTROL chamber reaction to ensure amplification is not inhibited, reagents are performing as intended and that sample processing was performed appropriately.
The illumigene Group A Strep External Control Kit contains a Positive Control Reagent. The External Positive control Reagent is used in conjunction with the illumigene Sample Preparation Apparatus II/Negative Control III reagent included in the illumigene Group A Strep Kit as part of routine Quality Control testing. External Control reagents are provided to aid the user in detection of reagent deterioration, adverse environmental or test conditions, or variance in operator performance that may lead to test errors.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name:
GEN-PROBE® Group A Streptococcus Direct Test; Catalog 103890
2. Predicate 510(k) number:
K924715
{3}
3. Comparison with predicates:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | DEVICE (K122019)
illumigene® Group A
Streptococcus | PREDICATE (K924715)
GEN-PROBE® Group A
Streptococcus Direct |
| | | |
| Intended Use | Qualitative | Qualitative |
| Test Format | Molecular-based Amplification Assay | Molecular-based Direct Assay |
| Target | Streptococcus pyogenes | Streptococcus pyogenes |
| Specimen Types | Throat Swab | Throat Swab |
| Detection | Self-contained and automated | Self-contained and automated |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | DEVICE
illumigene® Group A
Streptococcus | PREDICATE
GEN-PROBE® Group A Streptococcus Direct
K924715 |
| Test Format | DNA Amplification Assay; Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) | Nucleic Acid Hybridization |
| Target Sequences Detected | 206 base pair (bp) sequence S. pyogenes genome, resident in the pyrogenic exotoxin B | Streptococcus pyogenes ribosomal RNA |
| Reagents/Components | illumigene Sample Preparation Apparatus II/Negative Control III
illumigene Group A Streptococcus Test Device
illumigene Heat Treatment Tubes | Lysis Reagent
Probe Reagent
Hybridization
Buffer Selection
Reagent Positive
Control Negative
Control Sealing
Cards |
| Amplification | Self-contained and automated | Not Applicable |
| Testing Time | Less than 60 minutes | Less than 90 minutes |
| Instrumentation | illumipro-10™ Automated Isothermal Amplification and Detection System | GEN-PROBE® LEADER® Luminometer |
| Reading Method | Visible Light Transmission | Chemiluminescent Emissions |
| Performance Characteristics | Sensitivity: 98.0% [95% CI: 93.1% - 99.5%]
Specificity: 97.7% [95% CI: 96.3% - 98.6%] | Sensitivity: 94.1%
Specificity: 98.3% |
{4}
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance; Approved Guideline- Second Edition (EP12-A)
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. User Verification of Performance for Precision and Trueness; Approved Guideline- Second Edition (EP15-A2)
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline- Second Edition (EP7-A2)
L. Test Principle:
The illumigene Group A Strep assay is based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification technology (LAMP). Loop-mediated amplification of DNA is accomplished by the use of specially designed primers that provide specific and continuous isothermal amplification. Magnesium-pyrophosphate is produced as a by-product of LAMP amplification. The magnesium-pyrophosphate forms a white precipitate in the reaction solution, giving the reaction solution a turbid appearance. Change in sample absorbance created by precipitation of magnesium pyrophosphate indicates the presence of target DNA and is considered a positive reaction. The absence of target DNA results in no detectable change in sample absorbance and is considered a negative reaction.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility
Blind-coded panels of 10 samples were supplied to three independent laboratories. Samples were randomly sorted within each panel to mask sample identities. The panels included contrived samples manufactured as low positive samples (i.e. limit of detection, n = 3) and high negative samples (n = 3). The panels also included contrived positive (n = 3) samples and natural negative samples (n = 1). Testing was performed by different operators at each site on the same day (intra-assay variability) for five days (inter-assay variability). Three lots of illumigene Group A Strep and five illumipro-10 instruments were used in this study. The results are given in the table below. The Reproducibility Studies are acceptable.
| | Site | | Site | | Site | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample Type | Percent | | Percent | | Percent | | Percent | |
| Negative | 10/10 | 100% | 10/10 | 100% | 10/10 | 100% | 30/30 | 100% |
| High Negative | 29/30 | 96.7 | 30/30 | 100% | 28/30 | 93.3% | 87/90 | 96.7% |
| Low Positive | 30/30 | 100% | 30/30 | 100% | 30/30 | 100% | 90/90 | 100% |
| Positive | 30/30 | 100% | 30/30 | 100% | 30/30 | 100% | 90/90 | 100% |
{5}
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
N/A
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
**Stability:**
Sample storage and hold time studies were performed to characterize *illumigene* Group A Strep assay ranges. Validation studies performed at Meridian were completed using rayon swabs in both Liquid Amies (without charcoal) and Liquid Stuart Transport Medium.
Study results demonstrated that throat swab samples can be held at $21^{\circ}$-$27^{\circ}$ C for up to 48 hours or at $2^{\circ}$-$8^{\circ}$ C for up to 7 days prior to testing. Samples diluted in the *illumigene* Sample Preparation Apparatus can be held at $2^{\circ}$-$29^{\circ}$ C for up to 2 hours prior to heat treatment. Heat-treated samples may be held at $21^{\circ}$-$29^{\circ}$ C for up to one hour prior to testing. Final testing demonstrated that rayon, polyester and flocked nylon swab types with either Liquid Amies (without charcoal) or Liquid Stuart Transport Medium perform acceptably with the *illumigene* Group A Strep assay. Swab and transport medium types with demonstrated performance in the *illumigene* Group A Strep assay appear in the Package Insert.
d. Detection limit
Studies were designed to determine the analytical limit of detection of *S. pyogenes* in throat swab specimens. Two common strains of *S. pyogenes*, ATCC 12344 and ATCC 19615, were evaluated with the *illumigene* Group A Strep assay. Each strain was spiked into sterile saline and diluted serially. Dilutions were combined with negative matrix (rayon swabs inoculated with normal throat flora screened negative for *S. pyogenes*, and Liquid Amies (without charcoal) Transport Media) prior to testing. A minimum of twenty replicates for each dilution were individually processed and tested to establish limit of detect. Testing was performed using three production lots of *illumigene* Group A Strep and six *illumipro-10* instruments. External Positive and Negative Controls were tested each day throughout the study. The Limit of Detection for the assay was reported as 400 CFU/Test for ATCC 12344 and 430 CFU/Test for ATCC 19615. The following *S. pyogenes* strains were tested and produced positive reactions at or below stated assay limit of detect of 400 CFU/Test with *illumigene* Group A Strep: ATCC 12384, NCIMB 13285, CCUG 33061, CCUG 33409, CCUG 39158, ATCC 49399, and CCUG 53553.
Limit of Detection studies are acceptable.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference Studies:
Potentially interfering substances were tested with negative and contrived positive (ATCC 12344, ATCC 19615) samples. Contrived positive samples were prepared near the reported
{6}
limit of detection for each strain tested. Negative samples and contrived positive samples were added to the illumigene Sample Preparation Apparatus II and inoculated with throat swab matrix (rayon swab inoculated with normal throat flora, screened negative for Streptococcus pyogenes, and Liquid Amies Transport Medium). Each inoculated sample was tested in triplicate.
The following biological substances, at the saturated solvent/diluent concentrations indicated, do not interfere with test results: Mucus (5.0mg/mL), Human saliva (10% v/v), and Whole Blood (2.5% v/v). Whole Blood at concentrations greater than 2.5% v/v may interfere with the illumigene Group A Strep Assay.
The following chemical substances, at the saturated solvent/diluents concentrations indicated, do not interfere with test results: Acetaminophen (19.5 mg/mL), Aspirin (12.3 mg/mL), Cepacol® Mouthwash, [Cetylopyridinium Chloride (0.005% v/v)], Cepacol® Sore Throat Lozenges [Benzocaine (0.09 mg/mL), Menthol (0.02 mg/mL)], Chloraseptic® Oral Anesthetic/Analgesic [Phenol (0.07% v/v)], Contac® Cold + Flu Tablets [Acetaminophen 16.2 mg/mL), Chlorpheniramine maleate (0.06 mg/mL), Phenylephrine HCl (0.16 mg/mL0], Crest® Complete Toothpaste [Sodium fluoride (0.1 mg/mL)], Diphenhydramine HCl (2.7 mg/mL), HALLS® Cough Drops [Menthol (0.08 mg/mL)], Ibuprofen (15.6 mg/mL), Listerine® Antiseptic Mouthwash [Eucalyptol (0.0092% v/v), Menthol (0.0042% v/v), Methyl salicylate (0.0060% v/v), Thymol (0.0064% v/v), Robitussin® Cough/Chest Congestion Cough Syrup [Dextromethorphan HBr (0.2 mg/mL), Guaifenesin (2.0 mg/mL). Zicam® Oral Mist [Zincum Aceticum 2X, Zincum Gluonicum 1X (0.625% v/v) produced invalid results in all replicates tested.
Interference studies are acceptable.
## Cross-Reactivity Studies:
Potentially cross-reacting microorganisms expected to be present in throat swab specimens were added to negative and contrived positive samples. The negative sample was prepared from S. pyogenes negative clinical throat swab sample in Liquid Amies (without charcoal) Transport Medium. The contrived positive sample was prepared by spiking sterile saline with Streptococcus pyogenes strain ATCC 12344 at approximately 400 CFU/Test, the reported limit of detection for the strain. Potentially cross-reactive microorganisms were added at concentrations of 1.2 × 10⁸ CFU/mL (bacteria and fungi); Human DNA was tested at 0.02 mg/mL. Dilution controls for each sample were prepared by adding sterile saline solution in place of the potentially cross-reactive microorganisms. Each sample was tested in triplicate. No microorganism tested met the definition of interferent or cross-reactive.
None of the following organisms reacted with illumigene Group A Strep:
Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter lwoffii, Aeromonas hydrophila, Arcanobacterium haemolyticum, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Bordetella holmesii, Bordetella parapertussis, Bordetella pertussis, Burkholderia cepacia, Campylobacter jejuni, Candida albicans, Citrobacter freundii, Corynebacterium diphtheria, Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenza, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Lactococcus lactis, Legionella jordanis, Legionella micdadei, Legionella pneumophila, Listeria monocytogenes, Moraxella
7
{7}
catarrhalis, Morganella morganii, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitides, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus bovis, Streptococcus canis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae (subspecies equisimilis), Streptococcus equines, Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus suis, Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus sp. Viridans type. Mycoplasma pneumoniae was tested at $1.5 \times 10^{6}$ CFU/mL with no reaction with the illumigene Group A Strep assay.
Cross-reactivity studies are acceptable.
f. Assay cut-off:
The illumigene Group A Strep assay has a fixed cut-off based on the measured change in light transmission at the assay endpoint. The illumipro-10 measures transmission of light through the Test and the Control reactions at the start of the Assay Run (Signal initial) and at the end of the Assay Run (Signal final). The illumipro-10 calculates that change in transmission between the Signal final: Signal initial and compares the result to a fixed cut-off value. Test results are reported as Positive or Negative based on comparison to the assay cut-off. Fixed cut-off values were based on well characterized clinical specimens.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not applicable
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Clinical trials for the illumigene Group A Streptococcus (Group A Strep) DNA Amplification Assay, including the illumipro-10 Automated Isothermal amplification and detection system, were conducted from April to June 2012. Performance characteristics of the assay were determined by comparison to composite bacterial culture method for Group A Streptococcus. A total of 798 qualified specimens were evaluated with the test; two specimens produced invalid results and were not included in performance calculations. Overall assay Sensitivity was reported as $98.0\%$ [95% CI: 93.1 – 99.5%]; overall assay Specificity was reported as $97.7\%$ [96.3 – 98.6%].
8
{8}
Compiled clinical study information is described below:
| Group A Streptococcus Composite Culture | illumigene Group A Strep | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 10 | 2 | 102 |
| Negative | 1 | 67 | 694 |
| Total | 11 | 68 | 796 |
| | | | 95% |
| Sensitivity | 100/102 | 98.0% | 93.1 – 99.5% |
| Specificity | 678/694 | 97.7% | 96.3 – 98.6% |
| Correlation | 778/796 | 97.7% | 96.5 – 98.6% |
Three independent clinical test sites located in the Midwestern and Southern regions of the United States participated in the device evaluation. All samples utilized in the study were leftover human specimens, not individually identifiable. All samples included in the study were submitted to the testing laboratory by an ordering physician for Group A Streptococcus testing and were presumed from symptomatic patients. No restrictions were placed on age, gender, medications or known pharmaceutical therapies.
Composite culture methods were employed to accommodate reports that Group A Streptococcus culture is considered $90 - 95\%$ sensitive when correct sampling and plating techniques are used. The Composite Culture Method consisted of the Clinical Site Culture Method as performed in standard of care testing and a Reference Culture Method performed by Meridian Bioscience. Site culture testing was performed by direct plating of the throat swab specimen while reference culture testing was performed by plating the swab transport media. Specimens producing positive Group A Streptococcus results from either the Site Culture Method or the Reference Culture Method was considered positive. Specimens that generated invalid or false-positive results were further evaluated. Data review for the two initial invalid samples revealed one Control Chamber failure and one suspect Test Chamber reaction. Repeat testing for both specimens produced valid, negative results; repeat testing data was not used in performance characteristic calculations. Discrepant specimens were further evaluated using a laboratory developed molecular assay with an alternate Streptococcus pyogenes DNA target. Thirteen of the 16 $(81.2\%)$ illumigene false-positive specimens were considered positive by the alternate molecular method. One of the two illumigene false-negative specimens was negative by the alternate molecular method; the remaining illumigene false-negative specimen was not tested. Site performance information was analyzed by Composite Culture Reference Testing and Site Culture Methods. Site performance as compared to Composite Culture Method, is summarized in the first table below.
{9}
Site performance as compared to Site Culture Methods is presented in the second table below:
illumigene Group A Strep Assay Performance by Site; Composite Culture Method
| Site Identification | Positive Specimens | | | Negative Specimens | | | Invalid Specimens | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | illumigene /Composite Culture | % Sensitivity | 95% CI | illumigene /Composite Culture | % Specificity | 95% CI | Invalid /Total | % Invalid |
| Site 1 | 47/47 | 100.0% | 92.4 - 100.0% | 287/291 | 98.6% | 96.5 - 99.5% | 0/338 | 0.0% |
| Site 2 | 28/30 | 93.3% | 78.7 - 98.2% | 203/211 | 96.2% | 92.7 - 98.1% | 1/242 | 0.4% |
| Site 3 | 25/25 | 100.0% | 86.7 - 100.0% | 188/192 | 97.9% | 94.8 - 99.2% | 1/218 | 0.5% |
| Total | 100/102 | 98.0% | 93.1 - 99.5% | 678/694 | 97.7% | 96.3 - 98.6% | 2/798 | 0.3% |
illumigene Group A Strep Assay Performance by Site; Clinical Site Culture Method
| Site Identification | Positive Specimens | | | Negative Specimens | | | Invalid Specimens | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | illumigene /Composite Culture | % Sensitivity | 95% CI | illumigene /Composite Culture | % Specificity | 95% CI | Invalid /Total | % Invalid |
| Site 1 | 40/40 | 100.0% | 91.2 - 100.0% | 287/298 | 96.3% | 93.5 - 97.9% | 0/338 | 0.0% |
| Site 2 | 18/18 | 100.0% | 82.4 - 100.0% | 205/223 | 91.9% | 87.6 - 94.8% | 1/242 | 0.4% |
| Site 3 | 16/16 | 100.0% | 80.6 - 100.0% | 188/201 | 93.5% | 89.3 - 96.2% | 1/218 | 0.5% |
| Total | 74/74 | 100.0% | 95.1 - 100.0% | 680/722 | 94.2% | 92.2 - 95.7% | 2/798 | 0.3% |
Seven of the 102 Composite Culture-positive specimens were positive by Site Culture methods only; 26 of the 102 Composite Culture-positive specimens were positive only by the Reference Culture method; the two illumigene false-negative results were positive only by the Reference Culture performed by Meridian Bioscience. Statistical analysis of Site performance data was performed with no significant difference among Sites identified. Clinical performance data was evaluated by patient age and gender. Seventy two (9.0%) patients tested were two years of age or younger; 385 (48.2%) patients were between two and 12 years of age; while 259 (32.5%) patients were greater than 12 and less than 21 years of age. The remaining 82 (10.3%) study patients were greater than 21 years old. Age information was known for all patients included in the performance analysis. No performance differences were noted based on chronological age. The study population included 410 (51.4%) female patients and 386 (48.4%) male patients. Gender was unknown for two (0.2%) of the study participants. No performance differences were noted based on gender.
b. Clinical specificity:
See 3(a) above
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
{10}
N/A
4. Clinical cut-off:
N/A
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Overall incidence of *Streptococcus pyogenes* in patients tested during the 2012 clinical study was 14.6% (116/796).
N. Instrument Name:
The illumipro-10
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
The illumipro-10 is a menu driven laboratory instrument with two independent sample processing blocks: Block A and Block B. Each illumipro-10 Block is capable of batch processing up to five closed illumigene test devices.
The illumipro-10 operates in four basic modes: ASSAY, RESULTS, SERVICE, and SYSTEM. Assay Selection and Sample Amplification occur in the ASSAY mode; Test Results are managed in the RESULTS mode; Basic instrument set-up is performed in the SYSTEM mode; and Optical performance verification is completed in the SERVICE mode.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
Samples are identified by position. Default Sample Identification is based on Block and Well position (e.g. Block A, Well 1). The user may input Sample Identification information using the keypad, the barcode scanner or the optional external keyboard.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Specimen Sampling and Handling is performed external to the illumipro-10. Prepared Samples in closed illumigene Test Devices are placed in the illumipro-10 for amplification and detection. The illumipro-10 has no direct contact with samples. Closed illumigene Test Devices are discarded at the end of the assay to reduce the likelihood of contamination of the illumipro-10 or the workspace.
11
{11}
5. Calibration:
The illumipro-10 was designed to be a self-monitoring instrument. Calibration by the end user is not required.
6. Quality Control:
Quality Control requirements for the illumipro-10 are limited to verification of optical performance and routine surface cleaning/decontamination. Optics system verification is performed by the user at installation and at 30 day intervals thereafter. Optics Verification Standards consist of ten red acrylic pieces molded and polished to replicate the dimensions of each illumigene Test Device chamber. The verification standards act like a high pass optical filter with the pass wavelength of 650 nm extending into the infrared range. Light transmission through the verification standard is used to confirm proper performance of the optics system. Failed optics verification testing for an instrument block will disable the block until the error is resolved. The illumipro-10 completes a Power-On Self-Test (POST) at each power-on. POST testing confirms that the Hardware and Software elements of the system are performing as expected. The illumipro-10 reports an error if POST failures are obtained; the instrument is disabled until the error is resolved.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Not applicable
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.