K121991 · Advandx, Inc. · OAH · Jan 7, 2013 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K121991
Device Name
ENTEROCOCCUS QUICKFISH BC
Applicant
Advandx, Inc.
Product Code
OAH · Microbiology
Decision Date
Jan 7, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3740
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
Enterococcus QuickFISH BC is a multicolor, qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay intended for the identification of Enterococcus faecalis and/or the detection of selected other enterococci on smears prepared from positive blood cultures containing grampositive cocci in pairs and chains observed on Gram stain. Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for susceptibility testing and/or differentiation of mixed growth. Enterococcus QuickFISH BC is indicated in an aid in the diagnosis of bacteremia caused by enterococci.
Device Story
Enterococcus QuickFISH BC is a qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay; utilizes fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technology. Input: smears prepared from positive blood culture bottles containing gram-positive cocci in pairs and chains. Process: hybridization of fluorescently labeled probes to target bacterial rRNA sequences; visualization via fluorescence microscopy. Output: qualitative identification of E. faecalis and/or other enterococci. Used in clinical microbiology laboratories by trained technicians. Results assist clinicians in rapid identification of enterococcal bacteremia, facilitating targeted antimicrobial therapy. Sub-culturing remains required for susceptibility testing and mixed growth differentiation.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study conducted at 5 U.S. sites with 244 blood culture samples (245 test results). Comparator: routine identification methods (BD Phoenix, Siemens Microscan, BioMérieux VITEK). Results: E. faecalis positive percent agreement 100% (70/70); other enterococci positive percent agreement 97.5% (39/40); negative percent agreement 100% (135/135). Study included various blood culture bottle types (BacT/ALERT, BACTEC).
Technological Characteristics
Nucleic acid hybridization assay using Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) probes. Employs fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) principle. Qualitative detection of rRNA targets. Form factor: reagent kit for slide-based microscopy. Requires fluorescence microscope for visualization. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with positive blood cultures containing gram-positive cocci in pairs and chains to aid in the diagnosis of bacteremia caused by Enterococcus faecalis or selected other enterococci.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Streptococcus spp. serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera (excluding streptococcal exoenzyme reagents made from enzymes secreted by streptococci) used in serological tests to identify Streptococcus spp. from cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Streptococcus and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Pathogenic streptococci are associated with infections, such as sore throat, impetigo (an infection characterized by small pustules on the skin), urinary tract infections, rheumatic fever, and kidney disease.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K121991
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain 510(k) SE determination for the Enterococcus QuickFISH BC Identification Kit for the identification of Enterococcus faecalis and other selected enterococci from positive blood cultures.
C. Measurand:
Enterococcus faecalis-specific ribosomal RNA sequences and ribosomal RNA sequences specific to other selected Enterococcus species
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative test using fluorescence *In Situ* nucleic acid hybridization (FISH) with peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes
E. Applicant:
AdvanDx Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Enterococcus QuickFISH BC
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| OAH | Class I | 866.3740
Streptococcus spp.
serological reagents | Microbiology (83) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
{1}
Enterococcus QuickFISH BC is a multicolor, qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay intended for the identification of Enterococcus faecalis and/or the detection of selected other enterococci on smears prepared from positive blood cultures containing gram positive cocci in pairs and chains observed on Gram stain.
Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for susceptibility testing and/or differentiation of mixed growth.
Enterococcus QuickFISH BC is indicated in an aid in the diagnosis of bacteremia caused by enterococci.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Enterococcus QuickFISH BC is a multicolor, qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay intended for the identification of Enterococcus faecalis and/or the detection of selected other enterococci on smears prepared from positive blood cultures containing gram positive cocci in pairs and chains observed on Gram stain.
Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for susceptibility testing and/or differentiation of mixed growth.
Enterococcus QuickFISH BC is indicated in an aid in the diagnosis of bacteremia caused by enterococci.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use.
4. Special instrument requirements:
QuickFISH slides with controls (AdvanDx CS012)
AdvanDx SlideStation 10 (AdvanDx AC028)
Dual Band Microscope Filter (AdvanDx AC007)
Additional equipment necessary for performance of the assay includes a fluorescent microscope equipped with a 60X or 100X-oil objective.
I. Device Description:
Enterococcus QuickFISH BC is a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay which uses a PNA probe to hybridize to E. faecalis-specific ribosomal RNA sequences, and a PNA probe to hybridize to ribosomal RNA of selected other Enterococcus species. The test provides rapid (20 minutes) identification of E. faecalis and other selected enterococci on smears made from positive blood cultures.
2
{2}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
E. faecalis/OE PNA FISH
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K083074
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | Enterococcus
QuickFISH BC | E. faecalis/OE PNA
FISH (K083074) |
| Intended Use | Enterococcus
QuickFISH BC is a
multicolor, qualitative
nucleic acid
hybridization assay
intended for the
identification of
Enterococcus faecalis
and/or the detection
of selected other
enterococci on smears
prepared from
positive blood
cultures containing
gram positive cocci in
pairs and chains
observed on Gram
stain.
Sub-culturing of
positive blood
cultures is necessary
to recover organisms
for susceptibility
testing and/or
differentiation of
mixed growth.
Enterococcus
QuickFISH BC is
indicated in an aid in
the diagnosis of
bacteremia caused by
enterococci. | E. faecalis/OE PNA
FISH is a multicolor,
qualitative nucleic
acid hybridization
assay intended for
the identification of
Enterococcus faecalis
and the detection of
selected other
enterococci (OE) on
smears made from
positive blood
cultures containing
gram-positive cocci
in pairs and chains
observed on Gram
stain.
Subculturing of
positive blood
cultures is necessary
for susceptibility
testing and/or
differentiation of
mixed growth. |
3
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | *Enterococcus* QuickFISH BC | *E. faecalis*/OE PNA FISH (K083074) |
| Indication for Use | *Enterococcus* QuickFISH BC is a multicolor, qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay intended for the identification of *Enterococcus faecalis* and/or the detection of selected other enterococci on smears prepared from positive blood cultures containing gram positive cocci in pairs and chains observed on Gram stain.
Sub-culturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for susceptibility testing and/or differentiation of mixed growth.
*Enterococcus* QuickFISH BC is indicated in an aid in the diagnosis of bacteremia caused by enterococci. | *E. faecalis*/OE PNA FISH is a multicolor, qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay intended for the identification of *Enterococcus faecalis* and the detection of selected other enterococci (OE) on smears made from positive blood cultures containing gram-positive cocci in pairs and chains observed on Gram stain.
Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary for susceptibility testing and/or differentiation of mixed growth. |
| Technology | Fluorescence *in situ* hybridization using PNA probes | same |
| Sample type | Positive blood cultures from standard automated blood culture device | same |
| Interpretation of | Qualitative | same |
4
{4}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | Enterococcus QuickFISH BC | E. faecalis/OE PNA FISH (K083074) |
| Results | fluorescence microscopy | |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Enterococcus QuickFISH BC | E. faecalis/OE PNA FISH (K083074) |
| Fixation Reagents | Fixation Two fixation solutions (QuickFix 1,2), at 55°C | One solution, at room temperature |
| Probe Reagents | PNA probes in 2 solutions: 1) Enterococcus PNA Blue contains 4 quenching probes 2) Enterococcus PNA Yellow contains 1 PNA probe for E. faecalis and 1 PNA probe for selected other enterococci | 2 PNA probes in a single solution: one PNA probe for E. faecalis and 2 PNA probes for selected other enterococci |
| Wash Reagent | No wash solution | Wash solution with Tris, NaCl and Triton X-100 |
| Mounting Reagent | Not needed | 3 mL photobleaching inhibitor in glycerol |
| Hybridization Time | 15-20 minutes | 30 minutes |
| Time To Result | 20 minutes | 1.5 hours |
| Assay Total Time | 20-25 minutes | 1.5 hours |
| Assay controls | Positive and negative controls included on each slide | Positive and negative controls prepared separately |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Not applicable
{5}
L. Test Principle:
The QuickFISH technology uses species-specific peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes in a fluorescence *in situ* hybridization format. The probes are specific to rRNA targets which are present in high numbers in bacterial cells. The assay is performed directly on smears prepared from blood cultures that have been shown by Gram stain to contain gram-positive cocci in pairs and chains. A mixture of a fluorescein-labeled *E. faecalis*-specific PNA probe and a Tamra-labeled PNA probe targeting selected other enterococci is added to the smear. The probe mixture also contains quencher-labeled PNA probes that serve to bind unreacted fluorescent labeled probes to suppress unwanted signal. Hybridization is performed at 55°C for 15-20 minutes; smear is then ready for examination by fluorescent microscopy. While maintaining their cell morphology, *E. faecalis* or selected other *Enterococcus* species cells become fluorescent by the specific binding of the fluorophore-labeled PNA probes. The fluorescence microscopy is performed using a dual band microscope filter at 60 to 100X magnification. Using fluorescent microscopy, *E. faecalis* will appear as green cells and other selected enterococci will appear as red cells.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A reproducibility study was performed using 14 isolates including *E. faecalis* (5 isolates – green positive), *E. faecium* (2 isolates – red positive), one isolate each of *E. gallinarum*, *E. casseliflavus*, and *E. raffinosus* (red positive), and one isolate each of *Staphylococcus epidermidis*, *Streptococcus pneumoniae*, *Streptococcus agalactiae*, and *Streptococcus pyogenes* (red and green negative). Reproducibility was >95%.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Controls
Each *Enterococcus* QuickFISH BC test slide contains both positive and negative controls ensuring that controls are run with each patient specimen. The slides are provided in individually sealed pouches with nitrogen and a dessicant. Slides are stored at 2-8°C and must be used immediately after breaking the pouch seal and prior to the expiration date. The controls of the *Enterococcus* QuickFISH BC assay slides contain the following mixtures of organisms specific for the *Enterococcus* test:
{6}
| Positive Controls | Expected Result |
| --- | --- |
| E. faecalis ATCC 29212 | Green Positive |
| E. faecium ATCC 27270 | Red Positive |
| | |
| Negative Controls | Expected Result |
| Micrococcus luteus ATCC 10240 | No fluorescence |
| Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC 204092 | No fluorescence |
| Klebsiella oxytoca ATCC43086 | No fluorescence |
| Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 12384 | No fluorescence |
## Fixed Smear Stability
The stability of the slides prepared for the Enterococcus QuickFISH BC assay were analyzed under a variety of conditions to support the labeling claim that fixed smears can be kept at room temperature for 1 hour prior to initiation of testing by the Enterococcus QuickFISH assay or stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}$ C for up to one day before initiation of testing. The evaluation included 6 strains of E. faecalis, 2 strains of E. faecium, 4 strains of other enterococcal species, 1 strain of Staphylococcus and 3 species of streptococci (not enterococci). Slides were prepared for each strain and read at time zero and 5 minutes at $55^{\circ}$ C; 5, 15 and 30 minutes at room temperature; and at 4, 18 and 24 hours at $2 - 8^{\circ}$ C. Controls were run with each test and gave the expected results.
The data demonstrated that fixed Enterococcus QuickFISH smears were stable at $55^{\circ}$ C for 5 minutes, at room temperature for 1 hour, and for 24 hours at $2 - 8^{\circ}$ C.
## d. Detection limit:
The detection limit for the Enterococcus QuickFISH was determined to be approximately $1 - 2 \times 10^{5}$ CFU/mL. Half-log serial dilutions of aliquots from positive blood cultures containing E. faecalis and E. faecium were prepared using blood/culture media. Aliquots of each dilution were plated in triplicate to determine the average concentration of organisms in each aliquot (CFU/mL); each aliquot was tested using the Enterococcus QuickFISH BC assay.
## Co-Infection Studies
Co-infection studies were performed for the Enterococcus QuickFISH BC assay using growth from BacT/ALERT SA blood culture bottles with sterile human blood added. The concentration of the target organism (E. faecalis) was tested at or near the LoD while the competing organisms were introduced at increasing 10-fold concentrations (E. faecium $2.0 \times 10^{3}$ to $2.0 \times 10^{10}$; Streptococcus mitis, $6.4 \times 10^{2}$ to $6.4 \times 10^{9}$; Escherichia coli, $8.0 \times 10^{3}$ to $8.0 \times 10^{10}$ and Candida albicans, $1.2 \times 10^{1}$ to $1.2 \times 10^{7}$). Results demonstrated that the target organism was detected in the presence of even high concentrations of competing organisms.
{7}
8
# Analytical Sensitivity
The sensitivity of the Enterococcus QuickFISH was tested with a variety of Enterococcus species. All 16 Enterococcus faecalis isolates tested gave the expected green positive result. Three species of Enterococcus gave false green positive results: Enterococcus caccae, Enterococcus haemoperoxidus and Enterococcus moraviensis. Fourteen species of Enterococcus gave red positive results and 7 species gave negative results with both the green and red probe. See tables below.
The following table lists the Enterococcus species that gave green positive results:
| Species | Strain ID | Enterococcus QuickFISH BC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 51299 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | NCTC 775 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 19433 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | NCIMB 13280 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | Clinical isolate | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | Clinical isolate | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 29212 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49533 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 14506 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 51188 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 7080 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49532 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49452 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 33186 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 13280 | Green |
| Enterococcus faecalis | NCTC 13379 | Green |
The following table lists the Enterococcus species that gave false green positive results:
| Species | Strain ID | Enterococcus QuickFISH BC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Enterococcus caccae | ATCC BAA-1240 | Green |
| Enterococcus haemoperoxidus | ATCC BAA-382 | Green |
| Enterococcus moraviensis | ATCC BAA-383 | Green |
{8}
The following table lists the Enterococcus species that gave red positive results:
| Species | Strain ID | Enterococcus QuickFISH BC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 27270 | Red |
| Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 35667 | Red |
| Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 51559 | Red |
| Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 19434 | Red |
| Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 49224 | Red |
| Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-472 | Red |
| Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 51858 | Red |
| Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 6569 | Red |
| Enterococcus flavescens | ATCC 49996 | Red |
| Enterococcus avium | ATCC 49463 | Red |
| Enterococcus casseliflavus | ATCC25788 | Red |
| Enterococcus durans | ATCC 6056 | Red |
| Enterococcus gallinarum | ATCC 49573 | Red |
| Enterococcus gilvus | ATCC BAA-350 | Red |
| Enterococcus hirae | ATCC 8043 | Red |
| Enterococcus hirae | ATCC 49135 | Red |
| Enterococcus malodoratus | ATCC 43197 | Red |
| Enterococcus mundtii | ATCC 43187 | Red |
| Enterococcus phoenicullicola | ATCC BAA-412 | Red |
| Enterococcus raffinosus | ATCC 49464 | Red |
| Enterococcus ratti | ATCC 700914 | Red |
| Enterococcus villorum | ATCC 700913 | Red |
The following table lists the Enterococcus species that gave negative results with both the green and red probes:
| Species | Strain ID | Enterococcus QuickFISH BC |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Enterococcus asini | ATCC700915 | Negative |
| Enterococcus cecorum | ATCC BAA-597 | Negative |
| Enterococcus columbae | ATCC 51263 | Negative |
| Enterococcus dispar | ATCC51266 | Negative |
| Enterococcus pallens | ATCC BAA-351 | Negative |
| Enterococcus saccharolyticus | ATCC 43076 | Negative |
| Enterococcus sulfureus | ATCC 49903 | Negative |
{9}
e. Analytical specificity:
The specificity of the Enterococcus QuickFISH BC assay was determined using a panel of 76 gram positive (non-enterococci) and gram negative organisms and 6 Candida species. All isolates tested negative with the assay with the exception of Granicatella adiacens which gave a fluorescent orange signal. In addition weak green signals were seen with Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis, Granicatella elegans and 2 strains of Streptococcus anginosus.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
g. Media Interference Studies
A media compatibility study was performed using the following blood culture bottle types: BacT/Alert (SA and SN), BACTEC (Lytic 10, Aerobic Plus, Anaerobic Plus, PEDS Plus, Standard 10 Aerobic, Standard Anaerobic) and VersaTREK REDOX-1 Aerobic. Organisms used included 6 strains of E. faecalis, 2 strains of E. faecium as well as 4 strains of additional Enterococcus species expected to give positive results, one strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis and 3 Streptococcus species. Results showed the Enterococcus QuickFISH to be compatible with all of the above mentioned blood culture bottle types.
The Enterococcus QuickFISH is not compatible with blood culture media containing charcoal or with VersaTREK REDOX 2 blood culture bottles.
h. Validation studies:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Not Applicable
3. Clinical studies:
The performance of the Enterococcus QuickFISH BC assay was compared to results obtained from routine identification methods for the identification of enterococci from blood cultures. The clinical studies were performed at 5 clinical laboratory sites in the U.S. A total of 244 blood culture bottles growing gram positive cocci in pairs and chains (as assessed by Gram stain) from 244 patients were included in the study. One blood culture contained a mixture of 2 species of Enterococcus (one red positive and one green positive) to provide a total of 245 test results. Blood cultures were performed using two commercially available, continuously monitoring blood
10
{10}
culture systems, BacT/ALERT (BioMérieux) and BACTEC (Becton Dickinson and Co). The identification comparator methods included BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (1 site), Siemens Microscan (1 site) and BioMérieux VITEK (3 sites). The positive agreement for $E$ faecalis was $100\%$ (70/70). For other enterococci the positive agreement was $97.5\%$ (39/40). Negative percent agreement was $100\%$ (135/135).
# Performance Data for Enterococcus QuickFISH BC vs. Reference Identification Methods on Blood Cultures Positive with Gram-Positive Cocci in Pairs and Chains (all sites)
| Enterococcus QuickFISH BC | Reference Method | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | E. faecalis | Other Enterococci | Other (non enterococci)3 |
| E. faecalis | 70 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Enterococci | 0 | 39 | 0 |
| Negative | 0 | 11 | 135 |
| Total | Positive Percent Agreement | Positive Percent Agreement | Negative Percent Agreement |
| | 100% (70/70)2 | 97.5% (39/40)2 | 100% (135/135) |
| | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI |
| | (94.8 – 100) | (87.5 – 99.6) | (97.2 – 100) |
1 One false negative sample (tested 1 hour and 15 minutes from the time of Gram stain) was a mixed culture comprised of E. faecium, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Repeat testing one week later was weak red positive.
2 Includes 1 mixed culture comprised of E. faecalis, E. gallinarum and Serratia marcescens
3 Other organisms included: Streptococcus species (unspecified Alpha hemolytic streptococci, unspecified Beta hemolytic streptococci, S. agalactiae, S. anginosus, S. constellatus, S. gallolyticus, S. gordonii, S. intermedius, S. mitis, S. mutans, S. oralis, S. parasanguinis, S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, S. salivarius, S. sanguinis, S. viridans), Staphylococcus species (S. aureus, S. capitis, S. epidermidis, S. hominis, and other unspecified coagulase negative staphylococci), Lactococcus lactis, Lactococcus raffinolactis, Leuconostoc spp, Granulicatella adiacens, unspecified anaerobic gram positive cocci, and gram negative rods in mixed culture with gram positive cocci in pairs and chains.
In the clinical studies, bottles were stored at room temperature after Gram stain
{11}
and before Enterococcus QuickFISH testing. The time between Gram stain and preparation of the Enterococcus QuickFISH slides varied from less than 2 hours to greater than 48 hours. There was only one test discrepancy in the study (1/244). This sample was from a mixed culture and was tested within 2 hours of Gram stain.
## Performance Data for Enterococcus QuickFISH BC vs. Reference Identification Methods by Blood Culture Bottle Types (all samples)
| Bottle Type | Positive Percent Agreement E. faecalis | Positive Percent Agreement other enterococci | Negative Percent Agreement |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Total BACTEC (BACTEC Plus Aerobic and BACTEC Lytic/10 Anaerobic) | 100% (42/42)
95% CI
(91.6 – 100) | 95.8% (23/24)
95% CI
(79.8 – 99.3) | 100% (74/74)
95% CI
(95.1 – 100) |
| Total BacT/ALERT (BacT/ALERT SA Aerobic and BacT/ALERT SN Anaerobic | 100% (23/23)
95% CI
(85.7 – 100) | 100% (13/13)
95% CI
(77.2 – 100) | 100% (45/45)
95% CI
(92.1 – 100) |
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
See table above
b. Clinical specificity:
See table above
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Enterococcus faecalis: multiple bright green fluorescent cocci in multiple fields of view.
Selected other enterococci: multiple bright red fluorescent cocci in multiple fields of view.
Non-enterococci and species of enterococci not identified by this assay appear non-fluorescent.
12
{12}
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.