K121936 · Blue Belt Technologies, Inc. · OLO · Nov 30, 2012 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K121936
Device Name
NAVIOPFS
Applicant
Blue Belt Technologies, Inc.
Product Code
OLO · Neurology
Decision Date
Nov 30, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The NavioPFS™ System is intended to assist the surgeon in providing software defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during orthopedic procedures. The NavioPFS™ System is indicated for use in surgical knee procedures, in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to rigid anatomical bony structures can be determined. These procedures include unicondylar knee replacement.
Device Story
NavioPFS is a computer-assisted orthopedic surgical navigation and burring system. Input: passive infrared tracking of bone surface landmarks via Polaris camera. Operation: system creates intraoperative non-CT bone model; surgeon plans implant location; software defines spatial boundaries. Execution: system controls standard surgical drill motor/bur (Anspach/Synthes eMax2 plus) via tracking; bur motion restricted by guard retraction or speed control as target surface is reached. Output: real-time navigation display, bone surface model, and trial range-of-motion data. Used in OR by surgeons to guide bone preparation for unicondylar knee replacement. Benefits: provides software-defined spatial boundaries to limit bone removal and improve implant fit accuracy. System logs patient/procedure data for archival.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical tests were conducted. Evidence consists of bench verification testing (software code/unit/integration, biocompatibility, drawing inspections) and clinical simulation (usability testing) in simulated knees (sawbones) and cadaver labs. Users included surgeons, physician's assistants, and technical support personnel.
Technological Characteristics
Components: IR image system (Northern Digital Polaris), reflective trackers, computer, display, probes, surgical bur, sterile bur guards, bone screws/clamps. Sensing: passive infrared optical tracking. Energy: electrical (surgical drill motor). Connectivity: standalone system with CD data archival. Sterilization: radiation (ISO 11137-2). Software: navigation and boundary control algorithm.
Indications for Use
Indicated for surgical knee procedures, including unicondylar knee replacement, where stereotactic surgery is appropriate and reference to rigid anatomical bony structures can be determined.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
Predicate Devices
MAKO Surgical Tactile Guidance System v2.0 ("MAKO RIO") (K081867)
The Zimmer (ORTHOsoft) Navitrack® System - OS Unicondylar Knee Universal (K071714)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Traditional 510(k)
Tab 6 – 510(k) Summary_
NOV-3-0-2012-
Navio™ PFS
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
| TAB 6 | | |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| 510(K) SUMMARY | | |
| | K121936 | |
| Official Contact | Richard G. Confer<br>Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance<br>Blue Belt Technologies<br>2828 Liberty Ave.<br>Pittsburgh, PA 15222<br>Email: rconfer@bluebelttech.com<br>412-683-3844 X 106<br>412-683-6447 | |
| Date of Submission | June 29, 2012 | |
| Classification Reference | 21 CFR 882.4560 | |
| Product Code | OLO | |
| Common/Usual Name | Orthopedic Sterotaxic Instrument | |
| Proprietary Name | NavioPFSTM | |
| Predicate Device(s) | MAKO Surgical Tactile Guidance System v2.0 ("MAKO RIO")<br>(K081867)<br>The Zimmer (ORTHOsoft) Navitrack® System - OS Unicondylar<br>Knee Universal (K071714) | |
Reason for submission
.
New Device
.
・
{1}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
The NavioPFS™ System is intended to assist the surgeon in providing software defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during orthopedic procedures.
The NavioPFS™ System is indicated for use in surgical knee procedures, in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to rigid anatomical bony structures can be determined. These procedures include unicondylar knee replacement.
#### Device Description
The NavioPFS™ System is a computer-assisted orthopedic surgical navigation and surgical burring system. The system uses established technologies of navigation via a passive infrared tracking camera to aid the surgeon in establishing a bone surface model for the targery and to plan the surgical implant location based on predefined bone landmarks and known configuration of the surgical implant. The NavioPFS™ System then aids the surgeon in executing the surgical plan by using a standard off-theshelf surgical drill motor and bur (Anspach/Synthes eMax2 plus (K080802) which has been adapted using a tracking system. The surgical bur is located in a handpiece which allows the bur to move within the handbiece. In the NavioPFSM System the software controls the position of the surgical bur relative to the end of a guard attached to the handpiece and prohibits the bur from cutting bone as it approaches the planned target surface. As the planned surface is reached the tip of the bur is fully retracted within the guard.
An alternate mode of operation is the speed control mode. In this mode the speed of the bur is controlled and the bur stops as the planned surface is reached. In this mode of operation the bur does not retract into the guard. This mode of operation is useful in shaping posterior surfaces of the condyle as well as placing post holes.
After the bone is prepared the surgeon is prompted to do a trial range of motion (ROM) test. Data collected using the tibial and femoral trackers is displayed as the knee and limb through a series of flexion, extension and rotational movements. Data is collected from the trackers and displayed in graphical formation is for use by the surgeon in determining fit of the implant (either the trial implant or the final implants after cementing) prior to finalization of the procedure.
The NavioPFS™ Computer system maintains a log of the patient data and procedure data. Each entry is date and time stamped. Data log entries include date and for data line entry, patient and procedure ID. implant ID. step in process and error messages. This data can be archived to a CD upon demand at the end of the procedure.
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Summary of technological similarities with predicates
| Summary of Similarities and Differences<br>NavioPFS™, MAKO RIO and Navitrack System - OS Unicondylar Knee Universal | | | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Devices | Blue Belt Technologies<br>NavioPFS™ | Predicate A.<br>MAKO Surgical Tactile<br>Guidance System v2.0<br>("MAKO RIO") (K081867) | Predicate B.<br>The Zimmer (Orthosoft)<br>Navitrack® System -<br>OS Unicondylar Knee<br>Universal (K071714) |
| Technological<br>Characteristics | The NavioPFS™ System<br>uses a combination of two<br>established technologies<br>to prepare bone for<br>attachment of implant<br>components. The<br>NavioPFS™ uses<br>intraoperative data<br>collection (image free or<br>non-CT data generation)<br>to create a model of the<br>patient's femur and tibia<br>and allows the surgeon to<br>prepare a surgical plan.<br>This is equivalent to the<br>methodology used by the<br>Navitrack system.<br>The NavioPFS™ uses<br>predefined boundaries<br>generated during the<br>planning process to<br>control the motion of the<br>surgical bur and limit the<br>amount of bone removed<br>in order to shape the<br>condyles and tibial plateau<br>in preparation for<br>placement of the surgical<br>implant.<br>Bur motion is controlled<br>either by retracting the<br>bur in a guard, or by<br>controlling the speed of<br>the bur. | The MAKO RIO uses<br>preoperative CT imaging<br>to create a model of the<br>patient's femur and tibia<br>which allows the surgeon<br>to prepare a surgical plan.<br>The plan is then verified<br>intra-operatively during<br>the procedure.<br>The MAKO RIO uses<br>predefined boundaries<br>generated during the<br>above described planning<br>process to control the<br>motion of the surgical bur<br>and limit the amount of<br>bone removed in order to<br>shape the condyles and<br>tibial plateau in<br>preparation for placement<br>of the surgical implant.<br>The motion is controlled<br>by a robotic arm which<br>provides resistance to<br>movement as the target<br>boundary is approached. | The Navitrack System -<br>OS Unicondylar Knee<br>Universal device<br>consists of software, a<br>computer workstation,<br>an optical tracking<br>system, surgical<br>instruments, and<br>tracking accessories,<br>designed to assist the<br>surgeon in the<br>placement of<br>unicondylar knee<br>replacement<br>components.<br>Tracking devices are<br>incorporated with given<br>surgical instruments, as<br>well as on fixation<br>bases that attach to<br>each of the femur and<br>tibia, such to allow the<br>ability to track and<br>display to the user their<br>respective positions<br>intra-operatively. The<br>femur and tibia are<br>displayed to the user in<br>the form of their main .<br>alignment axes. The<br>alignment axes are<br>determined and<br>recorded intra-<br>operatively by<br>identifying the key<br>anatomical references<br>that are used clinically<br>to align and position the<br>components. The<br>Navitrack system does<br>not require a<br>preoperative CT scan. |
| Summary of Similarities and Differences<br>NavioPFS™, MAKO RIO and Navitrack System - OS Unicondylar Knee Universal | | | |
| Devices | Blue Belt Technologies<br>NavioPFS™ | Predicate A.<br>MAKO Surgical Tactile<br>Guidance System v2.0<br>("MAKO RIO") (K081867) | Predicate B.<br>The Zimmer (Orthosoft)<br>Navitrack® System -<br>OS Unicondylar Knee<br>Universal (K071714) |
| Construction | Consists of an IR image<br>system (Northern Digital<br>Polaris), reflective<br>trackers, computer, user<br>interface display, various<br>probes, a surgical bur,<br>sterile bur guards, bone<br>screws and clamps. | Consists of an IR image<br>system (Northern Digital<br>Polaris), reflective<br>trackers, computer, user<br>interface display, various<br>probes, a surgical bur<br>bone screws and clamps. | Consists of an IR image<br>system (Northern Digital<br>Polaris), reflective<br>trackers, computer,<br>user interface display,<br>various probes, bone<br>screws and clamps. |
| Pre-Surgical<br>Planning Method | Uses data collected intra-<br>operatively by surgeon<br>during the initial surgical<br>procedure to generate a<br>real time plan of cut<br>surfaces. | Uses DICOM data<br>imported from pre-<br>operative CT scans. | Uses data collected<br>intra-operatively by<br>surgeon during initial<br>surgical procedure to<br>generate real time plan<br>of cut surfaces. Does<br>not require a pre-<br>operative CT scan. |
| Imaging<br>Requirements | None preoperative.<br>Possible post-operative to<br>verify implant placement<br>after surgeon finalizes<br>placement | CT Scans required<br>preoperatively.<br>Possible post-operative<br>scans to confirm implant<br>placement after surgeon<br>finalizes placement. | None preoperative.<br>Possible post-operative<br>to verify implant<br>placement after<br>surgeon finalizes<br>placement |
.
06/29/2012
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Nonclinical testing:
Design verification tests were performed on the Blue Belt Technologies NavioPFS™ as a result of the risk analysis and product requirements. Testing included software code reviews, software unit testing, software integration testing, bench verification testing, biocompatibility testing, user manual/labeling inspection, drawing inspections, and a clinical simulation (usability testing). Simulated use testing included testing in simulated knees (sawbones) and cadaver lab testing. Users included surgeons, physician's assistants, and technical support personnel who were able to successfully use the NavioPFS™ system, and place implants per Blue Belt Technologies' specifications after being adequately trained.
In addition to the bench and simulated use testing cited above, compliance testing to the following standards was completed.
- IEC 60601-1:2005 Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1: General Requirements for Safety .
- . IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 3:2007-03, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-2: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements and tests.
- AAMI/ANSI/ISO 11607-1:2006 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices Part 1: . Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems
- ISO 11607-2:2006 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices Part 2: Validation .
{4}------------------------------------------------
requirements for forming, sealing and assembly processes
- ISO 10993-1 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a . risk management system
- ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-2:2006 Sterilization of health care products Radiation Part 2: . Establishing the sterilization dose
#### Discussion of similarities and differences
The NavioPFS™ System uses a combination of two established technologies to prepare bone for
attachment of implant components. The NavioPFS™ uses intraoperative data collectio non-CT data generation) to create a model of the patient's femur and tibia and allows the surgeon to prepare a surgical plan. This is equivalent to the methodology used by the Navitrack system.
The NavioPFS™ uses predefined boundaries generated during the planning process to control the motion of the surgical bur and limit the amount of bone removed in order to shape the condyles and tibial plateau in preparation for placement of the surgical implant. This is similar to the methods used by the Mako TGS (RIO) system, although the Mako TGS (RIO) system uses a preoperative CT scan in addition to intraoperatively acquired data to plan the position of implant components.
#### Clinical testing
No human clinical tests were conducted to determine safety and effectiveness of the NavioPFS™ System.
#### Summary and Conclusions
In summary, based on the results of the clinical and non-clinical testing, the NavioPFS™ is as safe and effective and preforms as well as to the MAKO Surgical Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System ("MAKO RIO") (K081867) and The Zimmer (ORTHOsoft) Navitrack® System - OS Unicondylar Knee Universal (K071714).
{End of tab)
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with three stripes representing the three levels of government: federal, state, and local. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
Blue Belt Technologies, Incorporated % Mr. Richard G. Confer Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance 2828 Liberty Avenue, Suite 100 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222
Re: K121936
Trade/Device Name: NavioPFS™ Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: October 28, 2012 Received: November 01, 2012
November 30, 2012
Dear Mr. Confer:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device . referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 – Mr. Richard G. Confer
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Peter D. Rumm -S
Mark N. Melkerson Acting Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Traditional 510(k)
Tab 5 - Indication for Use Statement
## ISE
510(k) Number (if known): Device Name:
K121936 NavioPFs™
Indications for Use:
The NavioPFS™ System is intended to assist the surgeon in providing software defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during orthopedic procedures.
The NavioPFS™ System is indicated for use in surgical knee procedures, in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to rigid anatomical bony structures can be determined. These procedures include unicondylar knee replacement.
Prescription Use × (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Dwight Yen 2012.11.30 11:09:16 -05'00'
(Division Sign-off) Division of Surgical Devices 510(k) Number_ K121936
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.