PIONEER POSTERIOR OCCIPITO-CERVICO-THORACIC (OCT) SYSTEM
K121725 · Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. · KWP · Nov 7, 2012 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K121725
Device Name
PIONEER POSTERIOR OCCIPITO-CERVICO-THORACIC (OCT) SYSTEM
Applicant
Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.
Product Code
KWP · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Nov 7, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
When intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput-T3), the Pioneer Posterior Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic (OCT) System is intended for: -Degenerative Disc Disease (as defined by neck or back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) -Spondylolisthesis -Spinal Stenosis -Fracture/ Dislocation -Atlanto/axial fracture with instability -Occipito-cervical dislocation -Deformities or Curvature -Tumors -Pseudoarthrosis -Revision of previous cervical and upper thoracic spine surgery. The occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only. The use of the pedicle screws (standard and high angle) is limited to placement in the upper thoracic spine (T1-T3) in treating thoracic conditions only. The pedicle screws are not intended for use in the cervical spine. The hooks, connectors, and rods are also intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion following reduction of fracture/ dislocation or trauma in the cervical/ upper thoracic (C1-T3) spine. The Pioneer Posterior OCT System can also be linked to FDA cleared pedicle screw systems (e.g., Quantum Spinal Fixation System or Streamline TL Spinal System) using connectors.
Device Story
The Pioneer Posterior OCT System is a spinal fixation construct consisting of rods, hooks, polyaxial/high-angle pedicle screws, locking caps, occipital bone screws, occipital plates, and connectors. It is used by surgeons in clinical settings to stabilize the occipito-cervico-thoracic spine (occiput-T3) to promote fusion. The system can be linked to other FDA-cleared pedicle screw systems via connectors. The device provides mechanical stabilization to the spine, aiding in the treatment of various pathologies including trauma, deformity, and degenerative conditions. It benefits patients by providing rigid fixation to support bone healing and spinal alignment.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Evidence consists of bench testing conducted in accordance with FDA guidance for spinal systems, including dynamic and static mechanical testing per ASTM F2706 and ASTM F1798, supplemented by cadaver studies and computer modeling.
Technological Characteristics
Constructed from medical grade ASTM F136 titanium alloy and ASTM F1537 cobalt chromium. Components include rods, hooks, polyaxial/high-angle pedicle screws, locking caps, occipital bone screws, and plates. Mechanical fixation principle. No energy source or software components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput-T3) due to degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, fracture/dislocation, atlanto/axial fracture with instability, occipito-cervical dislocation, deformities/curvature, tumors, pseudoarthrosis, or revision surgery. Pedicle screws limited to T1-T3; occipital screws limited to occipital fixation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis is a device intended to be implanted made of an alloy, such as stainless steel, that consists of various hooks and a posteriorly placed compression or distraction rod. The device is implanted, usually across three adjacent vertebrae, to straighten and immobilize the spine to allow bone grafts to unite and fuse the vertebrae together. The device is used primarily in the treatment of scoliosis (a lateral curvature of the spine), but it also may be used in the treatment of fracture or dislocation of the spine, grades 3 and 4 of spondylolisthesis (a dislocation of the spinal column), and lower back syndrome.
Predicate Devices
Pioneer Posterior Cervico-Thoracic System (K112757)
{0}------------------------------------------------
| | 510(k) Summary | K121725 | NOV | 7 2012 | |
|--|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|--|
| | Sponsor: | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.<br>375 River Park Circle<br>Marquette, MI 49855 | | | |
| | | Contact: Sarah McIntyre or Emily Downs (906) 225-5861<br>Prepared November 7, 2012 | | | |
| | Device Name: | Pioneer Posterior Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic System<br>(Trade name: Streamline OCT Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic System) | | | |
| | Classification: | Class II per Regulation Numbers §888.3050 Spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis<br>and §888.3070 Pedicle screw spinal system<br>Product Codes: KWP, MNH, MNI; Panel Code: 87 | | | |
| | Predicate Devices: | Pioneer Posterior Cervico-Thoracic System (K112757)<br>Biomet Spine Nextgen Altius OCT System (K113593)<br>DePuy Mountaineer OCT (K042508)<br>Aesculap Spine: S4 Cervical System (K100147) | | | |
| | Description: | The Pioneer Posterior Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic (OCT) System consists of a<br>variety of rods, hooks, polyaxial pedicle screws, high-angle pedicle screws, locking<br>caps, occipital bone screws, occipital plates and connecting components used to<br>build an occipito-cervico-thoracic spinal construct. The purpose of this submission<br>is to introduce occipital plate and connecting components to the previously cleared<br>Pioneer Posterior CT System to expand the indications for the system as a whole<br>and to build an OCT spinal construct. | | | |
| | | The Pioneer Posterior OCT System components are manufactured from medical<br>grade ASTM F136 titanium alloy and ASTM F1537 cobalt chromium. Medical<br>grade titanium alloy and cobalt chromium may be used together. | | | |
| | Indications for Use: | When intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-<br>thoracic junction (occiput-T3), the Pioneer Posterior Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic<br>(OCT) System is intended for:<br>-Degenerative Disc Disease (as defined by neck or back pain of discogenic<br>origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic<br>studies)<br>-Spondylolisthesis<br>-Spinal Stenosis<br>-Fracture/ Dislocation<br>-Atlanto/axial fracture with instability<br>-Occipito-cervical dislocation<br>-Deformities or Curvature<br>-Tumors<br>-Pseudoarthrosis<br>-Revision of previous cervical and upper thoracic spine surgery | | | |
| | | The occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only. The use of the<br>pedicle screws (standard and high angle) is limited to placement in the upper<br>thoracic spine (T1-T3) in treating thoracic conditions only. The pedicle screws are<br>not intended for use in the cervical spine. | | | |
| | | The hooks, connectors, and rods are also intended to provide stabilization to | | | |
The noons, commoners, and 102 and the more/ dislocation or trauma in the
promote fusion following reduction of fracture/ dislocation or trauma in the
cervical/ upper thoracic
ﺮ
,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{1}------------------------------------------------
The Pioneer Posterior OCT System can also be linked to FDA cleared pedicle screw Indications for Use systems (e.g., Quantum Spinal Fixation System or Streamline TL Spinal System) (continued) ... using connectors.
Mechanical testing was conducted in accordance with the FDA's Guidance for Performance Data: Industry and FDA Staff - Spinal System 510(k)s dated May 3, 2004. Per the guidance document, the following testing was conducted: dynamic axial compression, static axial compression dynamic torsion and torsion static testing. Testing was conducted in accordance with ASTM F2706 and ASTM F1798. The test results, along with cadaver studies, computer modeling and dimensional analysis, demonstrate that the Pioneer Posterior OCT System functioned as intended and performed in a manner substantially equivalent to that of predicate systems.
Equivalence for the Pioneer Posterior OCT System is based on similarities of Performance and SE intended use, design, and physical characteristics when compared to predicate Determination: devices. Therefore, Pioneer Surgical Technology believes that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the Pioneer Posterior OCT System is substantially equivalent to existing legally marketed devices.
{2}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines representing its wings or body. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the emblem.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
#### Letter Dated: November 7, 2012
Pioneeer Surical Technology, Incorporated % Ms. Sarah Molntyre Regulatory Affairs Associate 375 River Park Circle Marquette, Michigan 49855
Re: K121725
Trade/Device Name: Pioneer Posterior Occipito-Thoracic System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3050 Regulation Name: Spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KWP, MNI, MNH Dated: September 24, 2012 Received: September 26, 2012
#### Dear Ms. McIntyre:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Sarah McIntyre
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
# Mark N. Melkerson
Mark N. Melkerson Director
Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use Statement
K121725 510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name:
Pioneer Posterior Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic System
Indications:
When intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput-T3), the Pioneer Posterior Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic (OCT) System junetion (overperative disc disease (as defined by neck or back pain of 15 menocu for acgeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, fracture/ dislocation, atlanto/axial fracture with instability, occipito-cervical dislocation, deformities or curvature, tumors, pseudoarthrosis, and revision of previous cervical and upper thoracic spine surgery.
The occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only. The use of the pedicle screws (standard and high angle) is limited to placement in the upper thoracic spine (TI-T3) in treating thoracic conditions only. The pedicle screws are not intended for use in the cervical spine.
The hooks, connectors, and rods are also intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion following reduction of fracture/ dislocation or trauma in the cervical/ upper thoracic (C1-T3) spine.
The Pioneer Posterior OCT System can also be linked to FDA cleared pedicle screw systems (e.g., Quantum Spinal Fixation System or Streamline TL Spinal System) using connectors.
OR Prescription Use __ ブ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
Over-the-Counter Use
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K121725
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.