K120563 · Microphage, Inc. · OUS · Mar 30, 2012 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K120563
Device Name
KEYPATH MRSA/MSSA BLOOD CULTURE TEST-BT
Applicant
Microphage, Inc.
Product Code
OUS · Microbiology
Decision Date
Mar 30, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.2050
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the timely identification of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and determination of methicillin susceptibility (MSSA) or methicillin resistance (MRSA) directly from positive blood cultures. The Test uses bacteriophage amplification to identify the presence of S. aureus and assess the phenotypic response of the target organism to cefoxitin, an indicator of oxacillin (a methicillin analog) resistance. The assay is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens that are determined as Gram Positive Cocci in singles (GPC) or as Gram Positive Cocci in Clusters (GPCC) by Gram stain. The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens from BD BACTEC™ blood culture bottles (Plus Aerobic/F, Plus Anaerobic/F, Standard/10 Aerobic/F and Standard Anaerobic/F). The Test is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical data available to the physician as an aid in the detection of MRSA/MSSA from positive blood cultures. Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary for additional susceptibility test determinations, differentiation of mixed growth and for epidemiological typing.
Device Story
KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test-BT is an in vitro diagnostic assay using bacteriophage amplification to identify S. aureus and determine methicillin resistance directly from positive blood culture bottles. Input: positive blood culture specimen (GPC or GPCC by Gram stain). Process: sample added to two reaction tubes containing bacteriophage and growth-enhancing/suppressive reagents. Blue tube identifies S. aureus; Red tube assesses phenotypic response to cefoxitin. If S. aureus is present, bacteriophage replicates to detectable levels. Susceptible strains (MSSA) do not grow in cefoxitin, preventing phage amplification; resistant strains (MRSA) grow and support amplification. Output: visual pink-to-dark red/purple test line on a detector device. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians. Results assist physicians in rapid identification of MRSA/MSSA, potentially enabling earlier targeted therapy and improved patient management.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Validation study used a panel of 80 clinical isolates (22 MRSA, 23 MSSA, 35 non-S. aureus) inoculated into BACTEC Standard/10 Aerobic/F and Standard Anaerobic/F bottles. Results showed >95% positive and negative agreement for both identification and susceptibility compared to reference methods. No clinical prospective/retrospective studies performed.
Technological Characteristics
Bacteriophage amplification-enabled lateral flow immunoassay. Components: lytic bacteriophage, cefoxitin, proprietary growth-enhancing reagents. Manual visual interpretation. Standalone test. No electronic components or software algorithms. Sterilization method not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative identification of S. aureus and determination of methicillin susceptibility (MSSA) or resistance (MRSA) in patients with positive blood cultures containing Gram Positive Cocci in singles or clusters. Used as an aid in detection; requires subculturing for further susceptibility testing or epidemiological typing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A staphylococcal typing bacteriophage is a device consisting of a bacterial virus intended for medical purposes to identify pathogenic staphylococcal bacteria through use of the bacteria's susceptibility to destruction by the virus. Test results are used principally for the collection of epidemiological information.
Predicate Devices
KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test - BT (k102342)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K120563
B. Purpose for Submission:
To obtain 510(k) SE Determination for the KeyPath MRSA/SA Blood Culture Test – BT for use with BACTEC Standard/10 Aerobic/F (SA) and BACTEC Standard Anaerobic/F blood culture bottles (SN). This expands the intended use of this device beyond that of the previously cleared device (K102342).
C. Measurand:
Bacteriophage amplification to identify the presence of S. aureus and assess the phenotypic response of the target organism to cefoxitin, an indicator of oxacillin (a methicillin analog) resistance.
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative lateral flow identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test using bacteriophage amplification growth based detection.
E. Applicant:
MicroPhage, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
KeyPath MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test - BT
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| OUS | I | 866.2050
Staphylococcal typing
bacteriophage | Microbiology (83) |
{1}
Page 2 of 10
## H. Intended Use:
### 1. Intended use(s):
The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT is a qualitative *in vitro* diagnostic test for the timely identification of *Staphylococcus aureus* (S. aureus) and determination of methicillin susceptibility (MSSA) or methicillin resistance (MRSA) directly from positive blood cultures.
The Test uses bacteriophage amplification to identify the presence of *S. aureus* and assess the phenotypic response of the target organism to cefoxitin, an indicator of oxacillin (a methicillin analog) resistance.
The assay is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens that are determined as Gram Positive Cocci in singles (GPC) or as Gram Positive Cocci in Clusters (GPCC) by Gram stain.
The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens from BD BACTEC™ blood culture bottles (Plus Aerobic/F, Plus Anaerobic/F, Standard/10 Aerobic/F and Standard Anaerobic/F).
The Test is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical data available to the physician as an aid in the detection of MRSA/MSSA from positive blood cultures.
Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary for additional susceptibility test determinations, differentiation of mixed growth and for epidemiological typing.
### 2. Indication(s) for use:
The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT is a qualitative *in vitro* diagnostic test for the timely identification of *Staphylococcus aureus* (S. aureus) and determination of methicillin susceptibility (MSSA) or methicillin resistance (MRSA) directly from positive blood cultures.
The Test uses bacteriophage amplification to identify the presence of *S. aureus* and assess the phenotypic response of the target organism to cefoxitin, an indicator of oxacillin (a methicillin analog) resistance.
The assay is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens that are determined as Gram Positive Cocci in singles (GPC) or as Gram Positive Cocci in Clusters (GPCC) by Gram stain.
The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens from BD BACTEC™ blood culture bottles (Plus Aerobic/F, Plus Anaerobic/F, Standard/10 Aerobic/F and Standard Anaerobic/F).
The Test is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical data available to the physician as an aid in the detection of MRSA/MSSA from positive blood cultures.
{2}
Page 3 of 10
Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary for additional susceptibility test determinations, differentiation of mixed growth and for epidemiological typing.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Manual readings only.
I. Device Description:
The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT uses lytic bacteriophage, specific for Staphylococcus aureus, as an amplification technology for detection of S. aureus and determination of methicillin resistance or susceptibility in positive blood cultures. To detect S. aureus the blood culture sample is inoculated into a reaction tube (ID). The bacteriophage infect the S. aureus (if present), replicate within the host (culminating in bacterial lysis) and over the incubation period, produce several cycles of bacteriophage amplification. In a separate Reaction Tube (RS), the KeyPath™ Test uses cefoxitin (methicillin analogue) which inhibits bacteriophage amplification for susceptible organisms (MSSA) and fails to inhibit bacteriophage amplification when the organism is resistant to methicillin (MRSA). The KeyPath™ Test then uses a self-performing immunoassay (Detector) to detect the increase in concentration of bacteriophage using antibodies specific to the KeyPath™ Test bacteriophage, and calibrated such that at a known concentration, it will produce a visible signal.
To determine antibiotic susceptibility and/or resistance of the bacteria, the KeyPath™ Test uses a second sampling device and a second lane within the Detector, in parallel with the first. The only significant difference between the two sampling devices is the presence of the beta-lactam antibiotic, cefoxitin, used here to distinguish between methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA) similar to a breakpoint antimicrobial susceptibility test. Because bacteriophage amplification relies on a viable host, susceptible organisms do not support bacteriophage amplification, and no line on the Detector will be produced. Conversely, if the organism is resistant, bacteriophage amplification will occur and a visible line on the Detector will be produced. Although this test runs in parallel with the identification test, the results are interpreted serially, as the antibiotic test result is only applicable to S. aureus. This measure of antimicrobial susceptibility or resistance is referred to as phenotypic, like antimicrobial disks, as opposed to genotypic, which refers to the detection of a molecular marker.
{3}
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test - BT
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K102342
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | KeyPath™MRSA/MSSA BloodCulture Test - BT | KeyPath™MRSA/MSSA BloodCulture Test - BT(k102342) |
| Intended Use | The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test - BT is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the timely identification of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and determination of methicillin susceptibility (MSSA) or methicillin resistance (MRSA) directly from positive blood cultures.The Test uses bacteriophage amplification to identify the presence of S. aureus and assess the phenotypic response of the target organism to cefoxitin, an indicator of oxacillin (a methicillin analog) resistance.The assay is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens that are determined as gram positive cocci in singles (GPC) or as | The KeyPath™MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test - BT is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the timely identification of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and determination of methicillin susceptibility (MSSA) or methicillin resistance (MRSA) directly from positive blood cultures.The Test uses bacteriophage amplification to identify the presence of S. aureus and assess the phenotypic response of the target organism to cefoxitin, an indicator of oxacillin (a methicillin analog) resistance.The assay is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens that are determined as gram |
{4}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | KeyPath™MRSA/MSSA BloodCulture Test – BT | KeyPath™MRSA/MSSA BloodCulture Test – BT(k102342) |
| | gram positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) by Gram stain.The Test is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical data available to the physician as an aid in the detection of MRSA/MSSA from positive blood cultures.Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary for additional susceptibility test determinations,differentiation of mixed growth and for epidemiological typing | positive cocci in singles (GPC) or as gram positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) by Gram stain.The Test is indicated for use in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical data available to the physician as an aid in the detection of MRSA/MSSA from positive blood cultures.Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary for additional susceptibility test determinations,differentiation of mixed growth and for epidemiological typing. |
| Single Use | Yes | Yes |
| Indication for Use | Professional Use | Professional Use |
| Interpretation of results | Visual | Visual |
| Patient population | Clinical patients | Clinical patients |
| Specimen type | Positive blood culture | Positive blood culture |
| Assay controls | Pos Control 1: MRSAPos Control 2: MSSANeg Control: NSANternal positive procedural controls | Pos Control 1: MRSAPos Control 2: MSSANeg Control: NSANternal positive procedural controls |
{5}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | KeyPath™MRSA/MSSA BloodCulture Test – BT | KeyPath™MRSA/MSSA BloodCulture Test – BT (k102342) |
| Intended Use | The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSABlood Culture Test – BT isperformed directly onpositive blood culturespecimens from BDACTEC™ blood culturebottles (Plus Aerobic/F, PlusAnaerobic/F, Standard /10Aerobic/F and StandardAnaerobic/F). | The KeyPath™MRSA/MSSA BloodCulture Test – BT isperformed directly onpositive blood culturespecimens from BDACTEC™ blood culturebottles (Plus Aerobic/F,Plus Anaerobic/F). |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI M100-S21 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-First Informational Supplement
# L. Test Principle:
The KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT (KeyPath™ Test) is a bacteriophage amplification-enabled immunoassay to identify Staphylococcus aureus and determine its resistance or susceptibility to cefoxitin from positive blood cultures, which have been determined to have gram positive cocci in singles (GPC) or gram positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) by Gram stain. This method utilizes the specificity of bacteriophage/bacteria interactions and their natural amplification processes to produce a surrogate signal. In the presence of S. aureus, bacteriophage will replicate, increasing to a detectable concentration. In the absence of S. aureus or the presence of bacteria other than S. aureus, the KeyPath™ Test bacteriophage do not replicate and remain undetectable. In addition, susceptible strains of S. aureus do not grow in the presence of cefoxitin and therefore do not support bacteriophage amplification, while resistant strains will grow and support bacteriophage amplification.
To perform the KeyPath™ Test, a sample of the positive blood culture is added to each
{6}
Page 7 of 10
of the two provided reaction tubes, each comprised of KeyPath™ Test bacteriophage and proprietary reagents that enhance the growth of S. aureus and suppress other organisms. One Reaction Tube (Blue) is used for S. aureus identification. The second Reaction Tube (Red) is used for resistance/susceptibility testing. Following incubation, a small amount of the sample from each Tube is pipetted onto corresponding sample wells on the Detector. If the specimen contains S. aureus a pink-to-dark red/ purple Test Line (T) will appear in the Blue ID Read Window of the Detector.
If the sample is positive for S. aureus, Resistance/Susceptibility is then determined by reading the Red RS Read Window. Resistance (MRSA) is determined by the development of a visible pink-to-dark red/purple line at the Test Line (T) in the Red RS Read Window, while Susceptibility (MSSA) is determined by the absence of a visible colored line at the Test Line (T) in the Red RS Read Window.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Not applicable for the added intended use of this device.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Not applicable for the added intended use of this device.
d. Detection limit:
Not applicable for the added intended use of this device.
e. Analytical specificity:
Not applicable for the added intended use of this device.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
g. Media Interference Studies
{7}
A media interference study was performed using both $10~\mu \mathrm{L}$ (recommended test volume) and $20~\mu \mathrm{L}$ (twice the recommended volume) of blood culture matrix inoculum. No interference with the expected identification or susceptibility results with the Standard/10 Aerobic/F (SA) and Standard Anaerobic/F (SN) blood culture bottles was observed, therefore demonstrating that the SA and SN blood culture matrix does not act as an interferent in the KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT.
# Summary data for SA bottle interference
| | | KP Test Result | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Condition | Type | MRSA | MSSA | NSA |
| Negative Control | None | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Control | MRSA | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| | MSSA | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| | NSA | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| Test | MRSA | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| | MSSA | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| | NSA | 0 | 0 | 40 |
# Summary data for SN bottle interference
| | | KP Test Result | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Condition | Type | MRSA | MSSA | NSA |
| Negative Control | None | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Control | MRSA | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| | MSSA | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| | NSA | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| Test | MRSA | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| | MSSA | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| | NSA | 0 | 0 | 40 |
# h. Validation studies:
A panel of clinical isolates obtained during the BACTEC trial MP2009-B (K102342) was tested using the BACTEC Standard/10/Aerobic/F (SA) and Standard Anaerobic/F (SN) blood culture bottles and the KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT. The panel consisted of 22 methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 23 methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 35 non-S.aureus (NSA) isolates from unique patients. BACTEC™ SA and SN bottles were charged with blood from healthy volunteers per IRB-approved study protocol MP2007A. Bottles were inoculated with approximately 100 CFU of organism from fresh overnight cultures, and tests were performed as indicated in the package insert.
Results obtained in the validation studies substantiate the expanded use of the device. Results achieved performance criteria of at least $95\%$ positive percent agreement and $95\%$ negative percent agreement for both identification and susceptibility results for both the SA and SN bottles.
{8}
| S. aureus detection | Bottles tested in this study | | Bottles tested in K102342 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | SA | SN | Plus A | Plus N |
| Positive agreement N, %, (95% CI) | 45/45, 100% (92-100%) | 44/45, 98% (88-100%) | 232/255, 91% (87-94%) | 100/107, 93% (87-97%) |
| Negative agreement N, %, (95% CI) | 35/35, 100% (90-100%) | 30/30, 100% (88-100%) | 546/557, 98% (96-99%) | 189/189, 100% (96-100%) |
| Methicillin-resistance within S. aureus | Bottles tested in this study | | Bottles tested in K102342 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | SA | SN | Plus A | Plus N |
| Positive agreement N, %, (95% CI) | 21/22, 95% (77-100%) | 20/21, 95% (76-100%) | 122/123, 99% (96-100%) | 52/53, 98% (90-100%) |
| Negative agreement N, %, (95% CI) | 22/23, 96% (78-100%) | 22/23, 96% (78-100%) | 107/108, 99% (95-100%) | 46/46, 100% (92-100%) |
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Isolates used in the validation study were tested using the KeyPath™ MRSA/MSSA Blood Culture Test – BT in original studies for device clearance (K102342). Results obtained in the validation studies for the expanded use of the devise were identical to those previously obtained.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
{9}
Page 10 of 10
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.