HEVYLITE HUMAN IGM KAPPA AND HEVYLITE IGM LAMBDA KIT
K113823 · The Binding Site Group , Ltd. · CFN · Mar 27, 2013 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K113823
Device Name
HEVYLITE HUMAN IGM KAPPA AND HEVYLITE IGM LAMBDA KIT
Applicant
The Binding Site Group , Ltd.
Product Code
CFN · Immunology
Decision Date
Mar 27, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5510
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Hevylite Human IgM Lambda Kit for use on Siemens BN™II is intended for the in vitro quantification of IgM Lambda (combined μ heavy and λ light chain) concentration in human serum on the Siemens Behring Nephelometer™ II (BN™ II). The test result is to be used with previously diagnosed Waldenstom’s macroglobulinemia in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. This assay has not been established for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. Hevylite Human IgM Kappa Kit for use on Siemens BN™II is intended for the in vitro quantification of IgM Kappa (combined μ heavy and κ light chain) concentration in human serum on the Siemens Behring Nephelometer™ II (BN™ II). The test result is to be used with previously diagnosed Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. This assay has not been established for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia.
Device Story
In vitro diagnostic kits for quantitative measurement of IgM Kappa and IgM Lambda concentrations in human serum. Uses nephelometry on Siemens BN II systems. Input: patient serum sample; Reagents: polystyrene latex particles coated with polyclonal monospecific sheep anti-human IgM (anti-kappa or anti-lambda). Principle: light scattering by antigen-antibody immune complexes; intensity proportional to antigen concentration. Output: quantitative concentration values (g/L). Used in clinical laboratories by technicians. Results assist clinicians in assessing patients with previously diagnosed Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia by providing specific immunoglobulin light chain quantification.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP05-A2 (total CV 5.7-10.6%). Linearity (r² > 0.99) and LoD/LoQ established per CLSI EP-17A. Interference testing showed no significant impact from hemoglobin, bilirubin, or chyle. Method comparison performed on 186 samples (110 normal, 78 Waldenstrom’s) against Total IgM (r=0.94), SPE (97.9% overall agreement), and IFE (100% agreement on 60 samples).
Technological Characteristics
Nephelometric immunoassay; utilizes Siemens BN II system for measurement; quantifies IgM heavy chain combined with Kappa or Lambda light chains in human serum.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in patients with previously diagnosed Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia to aid in clinical assessment in conjunction with other findings. Not for diagnosis, monitoring, or prognosis of the disease.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, an E (serum antibodies) in serum. Measurement of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k113823
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Immunoglobulin IgM Kappa (combined μ heavy and κ light chain) and
Immunoglobulin IgM Lambda (combined μ heavy and λ light chain)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative and Semi-Quantitative, Nephelometry
E. Applicant:
The Binding Site Group, Ltd.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Hevylite™ Human IgM Kappa Kit for use on Siemens BN™ II Systems
Hevylite™ Human IgM Lambda Kit for use on Siemens BN™ II Systems
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 866.5510, Immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E Immunological Test System
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product codes:
CFN - Method, Nephelometric, Immunoglobulins (G, A, M)
PDE – Immunoglobulin M kappa heavy and light chain combined
PDF – Immunoglobulin M lambda heavy and light chain combined
4. Panel:
Immunology 82
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Hevylite Human IgM Lambda Kit for use on Siemens BN™II is intended for the in vitro quantification of IgM Lambda (combined μ heavy and λ light chain) concentration in human serum on the Siemens Behring Nephelometer™ II (BN™ II). The test result is to be used with previously diagnosed Waldenstom’s macroglobulinemia in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings.
1
{1}
This assay has not been established for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia.
Hevylite Human IgM Kappa Kit for use on Siemens BN™II is intended for the in vitro quantification of IgM Kappa (combined μ heavy and κ light chain) concentration in human serum on the Siemens Behring Nephelometer™ II (BN™ II). The test result is to be used with previously diagnosed Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings.
This assay has not been established for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as intended use.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Siemens Behring Nephelometer™ II (BN™ II) (k943997)
I. Device Description:
The Hevylite™ Human IgM Kappa Kit and IgM Lambda Kit contain polystyrene latex coated with polyclonal monospecific sheep anti-human IgM antibody against combined μ heavy and κ light chain or combined μ heavy and λ light chain, a single level calibrator, two controls (low and high) and supplementary reagent in liquid form. The reagents contain 0.099% sodium azide as preservative.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s) and 510(k) number(s)
Sebia’s Hydrasys Agrarose Gel Electrophoresis Apparatus/Hydragel 15, 30 Protein Kit, SPE (k960029)
Sebia’s Hydragel Immunofixation, 6 IF, 12 IF PENTA Kits/ Hydragel IF, Double IF, 2 IF, & 4 IF Kits (k960669)
Hevylite™ Human IgA Kappa Kit for use on Siemens BN™ II Systems and Hevylite™ Human IgA Lambda Kit for use on Siemens BN™ II Systems (k082823)
Siemens N Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) and N/T Protein Control LC (k083445)
2. Comparison with predicate:
{2}
| Similarities/Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicates |
| | Heavylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lambda kit | Hevylite IgA Kappa kit and IgA Lambda kit (k082823) |
| Intended Use | Quantification of IgM κ (combined μ heavy and λ light chain) or IgM λ (combined μ heavy and λ light chain) concentration in human serum on the Siemens BN™ II | Quantification of IgA κ (combined α heavy and κ light chain) or IgA λ (combined α heavy and λ light chain) in human serum on the Siemens BN II |
| Indications for Use | Used with previously diagnosed Waldenstom’s macroglobulinemia and in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. | Used in previously diagnosed IgA multiple myeloma |
| Sample Matrix | Serum | Same |
| Detection Method | Nephelometric | Same |
| Instrument | BN™II | Same |
| Measuring range | IgM κ: 0.2 – 6.4 g/L
IgM λ: 0.175 – 5.60 g/L
(at standard 1/100 dilution)
Extended Range for IgM κ:
1/5 dilution: 0.01 – 0.32 g/L
1/20 dilution: 0.04 – 1.28 g/L
1/100 dilution: 0.2 – 6.4 g/L
1/400 dilution: 0.8 – 25.6 g/L
1/2000 dilution: 4 – 128 g/L
Extended Range for IgM λ:
1/5 dilution: 0.009 – 0.280 g/L
1/20 dilution: 0.035 – 1.12 g/L
1/100 dilution: 0.175 – 5.60 g/L
1/400 dilution: 0.7 – 22.4 g/L
1/2000 dilution: 3.5 – 112 g/L | IgA κ: 0.35 – 11.2 g/L
IgA λ: 0.33 – 10.4 g/L
(at standard 1/100 dilution) |
| Reference Range | IgM κ: 0.29 - 1.82 g/L
IgM λ: 0.17 - 0.94 g/L
IgM κ/λ ratio: 0.96 - 2.3 | IgA κ: 0.48 – 2.82 g/L
IgA λ: 0.36 – 1.98 g/L
IgA κ/λ Ratio: 0.80 – 2.04 |
| Controls | One low and one high control (serum, ready to use) | Same |
| Calibrator | Binding Site Hevylite Calibrator™ | Binding Site Hevylite Calibrator™ |
| Antisera specificity | polyclonal monospecific sheep antibody (anti-human IgM combined μ heavy and κ light chain or combined μ heavy and λ light chain antiserum) coated onto polystyrene latex | Sheep anti-human IgA combined α heavy and κ light chain or combined α heavy and λ light chain antiserum |
| Result | Quantitative measurement by nephelometry | Same |
{3}
| Similarities/Differences | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate | | |
| | Heavylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lamda kit | Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPE) (k960029) | Siemens Total Ig (k083445) | Immunofixation Electrophoresis (IFE) (k960669) |
| Intended Use | Quantification of IgM κ (combined μ heavy and λ light chain) or IgM λ (combined μ heavy and λ light chain) concentration in human serum on the Siemens BN™ II | Protein separation to assess for protein pattern abnormalities in serum and urine | Quantitative determination of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA and IgM) in human serum, heparinized and EDTA plasma, human urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by means of immunonephelometry on the BN systems. | Identification of monoclonal immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, or IgM Heavy Chain) and light chains (Kappa or Lambda Light Chain) in human serum and urine using the Hydrasys system |
| Indications for Use | Used with previously diagnosed Waldenstom's macroglobulinemia and in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. | | | Aid in the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies |
| Sample Matrix | Serum | Serum and urine | Serum, heparinized or EDTA plasma, urine and CSF | Serum and urine |
| Detection Method | Nephelometric | Electrophoresis | Nephelometric | Immunofixation electrophoresis |
| Instrument | BN™II | Sebia Hydrasys System | BN ProSpec® | Sebia Hydrasys System |
| Measuring range | IgM κ: 0.2 -6.4 g/L IgM λ: 0.175 - 5.60 g/L (at standard 1/100 dilution) | Minimum detection ~ 21-44 mg/dL monoclonal protein | IgM: 0.168 - 5.37 g/L (at standard 1/20 dilution) | Not applicable; Qualitative |
| Reference Range | IgM κ: 0.29 - 1.82 g/L IgM λ: 0.17 - 0.94 g/L IgM κ/λ ratio: 0.96 - 2.3 | Absence of monoclonal proteins | 0.4 - 2.3 g/L | Absence of monoclonal immunoglobulins |
| Controls | One low and one high control (serum, ready to use) | Sebia (PN4785) Control Serum | Protein Controls N Protein (serum) | Not applicable |
| Calibrator | Binding Site Hevylite Calibrator™ | Not applicable | N Protein Standard (serum) | Not applicable |
| Antisera specificity | polyclonal monospecific sheep antibody (anti-human IgM combined μ heavy and κ light chain) | No antisera required | Rabbit anti-human immunoglobulins | Mammalian immunoglobulins anti-human alpha, gamma, and mu heavy chains, anti- |
{4}
| Similarities/Differences | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Item | New Device | Predicate | | |
| | Heavylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lamda kit | Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPE) (k960029) | Siemens Total Ig (k083445) | Immunofixation Electrophoresis (IFE) (k960669) |
| | chain or combined μ heavy and λ light chain antiserum) coated onto polystyrene latex | | | human κ light chains and anti-human λ light chains |
| Result | Quantitative measurement by nephelometry | Semi-quantitative results are calculated from Total Protein for each of five protein fractions (albumin, α-1 AT, α-2 beta globulin, γ globulin)Qualitative results are visual interpretation of densitometric scan of each five protein fractions according to pattern symmetry by pathologist | Quantitative measurement by nephelometry | Qualitative visual interpretation of each of 6 electrophoretic mobility bands: (Total Protein, IgG IgA, IgM, κ and λ bands) by pathologist whether it is restricted monoclonal band or homogeneous polyclonal band |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP-5A: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry.
CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP-17A: Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation.
C28-A3: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory
EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
# L. Test Principle:
Evaluating the concentration of a soluble antigen by nephelometry involves the addition of the test sample (with either IgM Kappa $(\mathrm{IgM}\kappa)$ or IgM Lambda $(\mathrm{IgM}\lambda)$ ) to a solution containing the appropriate antibody (anti-IgM $\kappa$ or anti-IgM $\lambda$ ) in a reaction vessel or cuvette. A beam of light is passed through the cuvette and as the antigen-antibody reaction proceeds,
{5}
the light passing through the cuvette is scattered increasingly as insoluble immune complexes are formed. The antibody in the cuvette is in excess so the amount of immune complex formed is proportional to the antigen concentration. In nephelometry, the light scatter is monitored by measuring the light intensity at an angle away from incident light. A series of calibrators of known antigen concentration are assayed initially to produce a calibration curve of measured light scatter versus antigen concentration. Samples of unknown antigen concentration can then be assayed and the results read from the calibration curve.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A precision study was conducted in accordance with CLSI document EP05-A2. The study was carried out by testing three serum sample pools with different concentrations of IgMκ or IgMλ that span the measuring range of the assays at the recommended 1/100 dilution (0.2–6.4 g/L and 1.75–5.60 g/L respectively). An additional study was performed to evaluate the five instrument dilutions. All samples were analyzed using three different reagent lots on one analyzer. The study was performed over 21 working days, with 2 runs per day and each sample run in duplicate. A total of 84 measurements per sample were tested. Results are summarized below:
Hevylite™ Human IgM Kappa Kit for use on Siemens BN™ II Systems
| IgMK Sample | Mean g/L | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Low | 0.352 | 0.0191 | 5.6% | 0.0114 | 3.3% | 0.145 | 4.2% | 0.015 | 4.25% | 0.0266 | 7.7% |
| Medium | 1.162 | 0.0359 | 3.2% | 0.0324 | 2.9% | 0.534 | 4.8% | 0.044 | 3.77% | 0.0721 | 6.5% |
| High | 4.854 | 0.1456 | 2.8% | 0.1388 | 2.7% | 0.2183 | 4.2% | 0.126 | 2.6% | 0.2969 | 5.7% |
Hevylite™ Human IgM Lambda Kit for use on Siemens BN™ II Systems
| IgML Sample | Mean g/L | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-lot | | Total Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Low | 0.303 | 0.0098 | 3.5% | 0.0070 | 2.5% | 0.0150 | 5.4% | 0.015 | 4.99% | 0.0193 | 6.9% |
| Medium | 0.767 | 0.0115 | 1.7% | 0.0075 | 1.1% | 0.0563 | 8.5% | 0.066 | 8.59% | 0.0579 | 8.7% |
| High | 4.240 | 0.1694 | 4.2% | 0.1140 | 2.8% | 0.3743 | 9.3% | 0.344 | 8.1% | 0.4264 | 10.6% |
#### b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
A linearity study based on CLSI document EP-6-A, was carried out. Linearity across the assay ranges of IgMκ (0.2 – 6.4 g/L) and IgMλ (0.175 – 5.6 g/L) at the recommended 1/100 dilution was evaluated by testing each with a high and low dilution pool series. The high pools were prepared from serum spiked with polyclonal IgM protein and the low pools were prepared from serum diluted with instrument diluent. The pooled IgMκ sera had a high concentration of 6.437 g/L and a low concentration of 0.183 g/L. The pooled IgMλ sera had a high concentration of 5.683 g/L and a low concentration of 0.171 g/L. A dilution series of 11 analyte levels was prepared by blending the high pool and the low pool. All testing was done in triplicate. The % recovery was calculated as the differences of expected values and
{6}
the observed values. The % recovery ranged from 80 to 120% at each concentration. The observed values were graphed against the calculated values and a linear regression was performed. The regression plot equations where y is the measured level of IgMκ or λ concentration and x the theoretical concentration were:
$$
y = 1.035x - 0.075 (g/L), \quad r^2 = 0.9939 \text{ for IgMK}
$$
$$
y = 1.065x - 0.2175 (g/L), \quad r^2 = 0.9941 \text{ for IgML}
$$
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
**Traceability:**
The calibrator, the internal reference standard (IR) and controls are traceable to ERM-DA470k International Reference Material. The IR is prepared from pooled human sera and is used to control calibration between lots.
**Device Stability:**
Real-time stability studies were performed to support the following stability claims of the Hevylite IgM Kappa and Hevylite IgM Lambda kits:
- Shelf-life stability of the opened kits are stable up to 2 months after opening when stored at 2–8°C.
- Shelf-life stability for unopened kits when stored at 2–8°C is 12 months.
**Sample Stability:**
Sample stability studies were conducted. Fresh serum samples can be used when stored at 2–8°C for up to 21 days. Frozen serum samples can be used when stored at -20°C for up to a year.
d. Detection limit:
The limit of blank (LoB) and limit of detection (LoD) studies were performed following the protocol in CLSI EP-17A. The detection limit was determined by testing a blank sample (instrument diluent; LoB), the lowest calibrator (LoQ), and a sample with value close to the blank (LoD) sample at a neat sample dilution (1/1).
The LoB was determined by running diluent alone. The assigned concentrations were equivalent to 0.006 g/L for IgMκ and 0.000 g/L for IgMλ at minimum sample dilution (1/5). Samples were tested 60 times for LoB.
The LoQ samples were the bottom calibrator diluted in instrument diluent. The assigned concentrations were equivalent to 0.011 g/L for IgMκ and 0.008 g/L for IgMλ at minimum sample dilution (1/5). Samples were tested 40 times for LoQ.
The LoD is the lowest measurable concentration of the analyte that can be distinguished from zero; it has been calculated as 0.0095 g/L for IgMκ and 0.003 for IgMλ for the minimum sample dilution for the assay (1/5). Samples were tested 60 times for LoD.
e. Analytical specificity:
**Interfering Substances:**
7
{7}
Interference by endogenous substances were evaluated by addition of hemoglobin (5g/L), bilirubin (200 mg/L) and chyle (1500 FTU) to test serum samples representing analyte concentrations at the lower end of the reference range, the upper end of the reference range, as well as a pathological concentration. The negative control pools were prepared by spiking commercially obtained blank into the sera base pools. Samples were tested a minimum of three times each. No significant interference was observed with the interferents tested. Rheumatoid factor was not evaluated.
Hevylite™ Human IgM Kappa Kit for use on Siemens BN™ II Systems
| IgMκ Sample | Analyte Level (g/L) | Hemoglobin | | Bilirubin | | Chyle | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Spiked Concentration (g/L) | No. of Replicates | Spiked Concentration (mg/L) | No. of Replicates | Spiked Concentration (FTU) | No. of Replicates |
| bottom of normal range | 0.29 | 5 | 3 | 200 | 3 | 1500 | 3 |
| top of normal range | 1.82 | 5 | 4 | 200 | 4 | 1500 | 4 |
| pathological | 5.88 | 5 | 4 | 200 | 4 | 1500 | 4 |
Hevylite™ Human IgM Lambda Kit for use on Siemens BN™ II Systems
| IgMλ Sample | Analyte Level (g/L) | Hemoglobin | | Bilirubin | | Chyle | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Spiked Concentration (g/L) | No. of Replicates | Spiked Concentration (mg/L) | No. of Replicates | Spiked Concentration (FTU) | No. of Replicates |
| bottom of normal range | 0.17 | 5 | 3 | 200 | 3 | 1500 | 3 |
| top of normal range | 0.94 | 5 | 4 | 200 | 4 | 1500 | 4 |
| pathological | 5.12 | 5 | 4 | 200 | 4 | 1500 | 4 |
An additional endogenous interferant study was performed with a known IgMκ (0.74 g/L at a minimum 1/5 sample dilution) and a known IgMλ (0.052 g/L at a minimum 1/5 sample dilution) processed serum sample prepared from diluted calibrators and tested in triplicate with the following interferents: 4.56 g/L hemoglobin, 199.6 mg/L bilirubin, 1309 FTU of chyle. Minimal interference by these substances were observed (-2.2%; 4.8%; -8.3% on IgMκ and 4.5%; 1.9%; -9.88% on IgMλ respectively).
The package insert states in the Limitations section that "Nephelometric assays are not suitable for measurement of highly lipemic or hemolyzed samples, or samples containing high levels of circulating immune complexes due to the unpredictable degree of non-specific scatter these sample types might generate. Unexpected results should be confirmed using alternative assay method".
## Cross reactivity:
Cross reactivity studies were carried out by testing Hevylite IgM Kappa and Hevylite IgM Lambda assays in the presence of high concentrations of potentially cross-reacting monoclonal proteins in samples from IgAκ, IgAλ, IgGκ, IgGλ, κ light chain and λ light chain multiple myeloma patient sera. No significant cross reactivity was observed.
{8}
The potential cross reacting substances were tested at the following levels:
| Substance | Highest Level Tested (g/L) |
| --- | --- |
| IgAκ | 39.6 |
| IgAλ | 47.1 |
| IgGκ | 58.5 |
| IgGλ | 45.5 |
| κ Light chain | 6.5 |
| λ Light chain | 8.4 |
The samples were all tested for total IgG, total IgA, total IgM and also with the Hevylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lambda assays. The results for total IgM were compared with the results obtained by the Hevylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lambda assays.
In addition IgMκ Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia patient samples (highest 41.5 g/L) were tested on Hevylite IgM lambda kits to investigate potential cross-reactivity, and similarly IgMλ Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia patient samples (highest 48.5 g/L) were tested on IgM kappa kits.
**Antigen excess effect:**
The possibility of antigen excess occurring when using the devices on BN II Nephelometer was evaluated with three batches of patient serum samples containing high levels of IgMκ and IgMλ monoclonal protein concentrations above the assay range. No antigen excess effect up to 100 g/L of IgMκ and 100 g/L IgMλ were observed at the standard 1/100 sample dilution.
**f. Assay cut-off:**
The cut off values are the reference ranges for the normal population which have been established from the reference range study.
**2. Comparison studies:**
**a. Method comparison with predicate device:**
Analyses of the method comparisons were performed with each of the three predicate devices: Total IgM, SPE and IFE.
**Comparison with Total IgM quantitative measurement (k083445):**
Testing was performed on 110 normal adult sera and 78 IgM Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (48 IgMκ and 30 IgMλ) samples.
The table below shows the comparison of 186 sera tested by Dade Behring Total IgM and Hevylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lambda with exclusion of two outlier samples.
A limitation of the Hevylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lambda device is that samples from patients with hyperviscosity syndrome or cryoglobulinemia may not report accurately.
Regression analysis (Passing Bablok) of these samples is summarized below:
{9}
| Regression equation | n | 95% CI of Slope | 95% CI of Intercept | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Y = 1.16x - 0.32g/L | 186 | 1.10 to 1.22 | -0.40 to -0.23 | 0.94 |
Comparison with SPE semi-quantitative measurement (k960029):
110 normal and 78 IgM Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia presenting samples were compared by Sebia SPE semi-quantitative measurement and Binding Site Hevylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lambda quantitative devices.
Samples outside the 95% reference ranges for IgMκ, IgMλ or IgMκ/IgMλ ratio for the Hevylite were classified as abnormal/positive and samples within the reference range were considered normal/negative. For the SPE assay, samples with quantifiable monoclonal protein were considered abnormal/positive and samples without detectable monoclonal protein were classified as normal/negative. Results are shown in table below:
| | Sebia SPE | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive/ Abnormal | Negative/ Normal | Total |
| Hevylite Assay | Positive/Abnormal | 74 | 4 | 78 |
| | Negative/Normal | 0 | 110 | 110 |
| | Total | 74 | 114 | 188 |
Positive Percent Agreement: 100% (74/74) (95% CI: 100% - 100%)
Negative Percent Agreement: 96.5% (110/114) (95% CI: 93.1% - 99.9%)
Overall Percent Agreement: 97.9% (184/188) (95% CI: 95.9% - 100%)
Comparison by IFE (k960669):
Only 60 of the 78 IgM Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia samples had IFE analysis. A positive IFE result and an abnormal Hevylite result were obtained for all of the 60 clinical samples tested.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity and specificity:
Not applicable.
b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. is not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Adult normal range was assessed on a total 120 sera samples from healthy UK adult blood donors. The assays were performed on the Dade Behring BN II™ analyser. A non-parametric analysis of specimens for the distribution of IgMκ and IgMλ was performed.
{10}
| Normal Adult Serum | Mean | Median | 95th percentile range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| IgMκ (g/L) | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.29 – 1.82 g/L |
| IgMλ (g/L) | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.17 – 0.94 g/L |
| IgMκ/IgMλ ratio | 1.59 | 1.59 | 0.96 – 2.30 g/L |
The upper and lower limits of the reference range for IgMκ (0.29 – 1.82 g/L), IgMλ (0.17 – 0.94 g/L) and the IgMκ/λ ratio (0.96 – 2.30) are defined as the "cut-offs". Samples with a Hevylite result above any of these reference ranges are classified as positive i.e. abnormal.
The cut-offs have been validated by comparing percentage agreement in detection of monoclonal protein by SPE vs. Hevylite IgM Kappa and IgM Lambda and kappa/lambda ratio abnormal results
# N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
# O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.