LOQTEQ SMALL FRAGMENT SET LOQTEQ CORTICAL SCREW3.5, SMALL HEAD, T15, SELF TAPPING LOQTEQ CORTICAL SCREW 3.5, T15, SELF T
K113652 · Aap Implantate AG · HRS · Aug 30, 2012 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K113652
Device Name
LOQTEQ SMALL FRAGMENT SET LOQTEQ CORTICAL SCREW3.5, SMALL HEAD, T15, SELF TAPPING LOQTEQ CORTICAL SCREW 3.5, T15, SELF T
Applicant
Aap Implantate AG
Product Code
HRS · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Aug 30, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3030
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The aap LOQTEQ Small Fragment Set includes Straight Plates 3.5, Reconstruction Plates 3.5 and One Third Tubular Plates 3.5. The plates accept 3.5 mm locking screws and 3.5 mm cortical screws. They are intended for Fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, distal tibia, and fibula, particularly in osteopenic bone
Device Story
The LOQTEQ Small Fragment Set consists of bone plates (straight, reconstruction, 1/3 tubular) and cortical screws used for internal fixation of bone fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions. The system functions as an internal fixator when plates are used with locking screws. The device is intended for use by surgeons in clinical settings. The plates and screws provide mechanical stabilization of bone fragments to facilitate healing, with specific utility in osteopenic bone. The system includes a set of surgical instruments for implantation.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Effectiveness and safety were demonstrated through non-clinical bench testing, including implant fatigue tests with progressive loading and static/dynamic 4-point bending tests in accordance with ASTM F382.
Technological Characteristics
Plates: cp Titanium (ASTM F67 or ISO 5832-2). Screws: Ti6Al4V (ASTM F136 or ISO 5832-3). System includes straight, reconstruction, and 1/3 tubular plates with 3.5 mm locking and cortical screws. Mechanical fixation via bone screws. Non-sterile or sterile (implied by surgical use).
Indications for Use
Indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, distal tibia, and fibula, particularly in patients with osteopenic bone.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
Predicate Devices
Small Fragment Locking Compression Plate (LCP®) System, Synthes (USA) (K000684, K011335)
Zimmer® Small Fragment Universal Locking System (K082527)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
oop Implantate AG aap LOQTEQ Small Fragment Set
# ర్క్ ( ( ( ( ( ( ) ( ( ( ) ( ( ) ( ( ) ( )
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
KII 3.652
Page 1 of 2
| Sponsor: | aap Implantate AG<br>Lorenzweg 5<br>D-12099 Berlin<br>Germany | AUG 30 2012 |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| Company Contact: | Dipl.-Ing. Marc Seegers<br>Phone: +49-30-750-19 -192<br>Fax: +49-30-750-19 - 111 | |
| Date | December 5, 2011 | |
| Trade Name: | aap LOQTEQ Small Fragment Set | |
| Common Name: | Small Fragment Set | |
| Classification Name and<br>Reference: | 21 CFR 888.3030 Single/multiple component metallic<br>bone fixation appliances and accessories – Class II and<br>21 CFR 888.3040 Smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener -<br>Class II | |
| Device Product Code and<br>Panel Code: | Orthopedics/87/ HRS: Plate, Fixation, Bone<br>Orthopedics/87/ HWC: Screw, Fixation, Bone | |
| Predicate device: | Small Fragment Locking Compression Plate (LCP®) System,<br>Synthes (USA), K000684 (APR 28, 2000) and K011335 (JUL 27, 2001) and<br>Zimmer® Small Fragment Universal Locking System K082527 (DEC 18,<br>2008) | |
| Device Description: | Bone plates and screws are used for fixation of bone fragments, i.e., for<br>treatment of bone fractures and other bone injuries. Bone plates are<br>fixed with bone screws. Bone plates and bone screws are implants. If<br>the plates are used in conjunction with locking screws, a so called inter-<br>nal fixator will be realized (internal fixation). | |
| | The LOQTEQ® Small Fragment Set consists of:<br><ul><li>LOQTEQ® Straight Plate 3.5</li><li>LOQTEQ® Reconstruction Plate 3.5</li><li>LOQTEQ® 1/3 Tubular Plate 3.5</li><li>LOQTEQ® Cortical Screw 3.5, T15, self-tapping</li><li>LOQTEQ® Cortical Screw 3.5, small head T15, self-tapping</li><li>Cortical Screw 3.5, self-tapping</li><li>Cortical Screw 3.5, small head, self-tapping</li><li>Set of Instruments, Small Fragment Set</li></ul> | |
| Material: | Plates are made of cp Titanium (ASTM F67 or ISO 5832-2).<br>Screws are made of Ti6Al4V (ASTM F136 or ISO 5832-3). | |
{1}------------------------------------------------
aap Implantate AG aap LOQTEQ Small Fragment Set
Indications:
K113652
PAGE 2 of 2
Fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the so ranon, humerus, radius, ulna, distal tibia, and fibula, particularly in osteopenic bone
Substantial Equivalence
The Substantial Equivalence of the new device and the predicate device is based on similar intended use, design, functionality, components and materials in use.
Documentation including mechanical testing to show the substantial equivalence and safety and effectiveness has been provided with this submission.
Performance Data (Non-Clinical and / or Clinical):
Non-clinical tests have been performed and show the effectiveness and safety of the device.
#### Summary of Non-clinical tests:
Type of test:
Implant Fatigue tests with progressive loadings, representing worst case scenario with respect to clinical use and static and dynamic 4-Point bending tests acc. to ASTM F382
Assessment of test results:
Substantial equivalence with respect to the mechanical performance of the aap system could be stated due to the test results gained. The subject device is safe and effective, and whose performance meets the requirements of its pre-defined acceptance criteria and intended uses.
Documentation regarding the mechanical testing to show the substantial equivalence and safety and effectiveness has been provided with this submission.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
aap Implante AG % Mr. Marc Seegers, Dipl .- Ing., Director OA/RA Lorenzweig 5 D-12099 Berlin Germany
Re: K113652
Trade/Device Name: aap LOOTEO Small Fragment Set Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: HRS. HWC Dated: August 20, 2012 Received: August 22, 2012
Dear Mr. Seegers:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28. 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
AUG 30 2012
Image /page/2/Picture/11 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) of the United States. The seal features a stylized eagle with its wings spread, symbolizing protection and service. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle, indicating the department's name and national affiliation.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Marc Seegers
forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Einell Keith
As-Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use Statement
#### 510(k) Number (if known): K113652
## Device Name: LOQTEQ Small Fragment Set
#### Indications for Use:
The aap LOQTEQ Small Fragment Set includes Straight Plates 3.5, Reconstruction Plates 3.5 and One Third Tubular Plates 3.5. The plates accept 3.5 mm locking screws and 3.5 mm cortical screws. They are intended for
Fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, distal tibia, and fibula, particularly in osteopenic bone
Prescription Use ਮ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Aseb
(Division Sign-Oft) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K113652
Page _1_ of _1
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.